How much energy do we need to ablate 1 mm3 of stone during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy? An in vitro study

Comparison of high and low pulse energy dusting protocols using holmium: YAG laser in flexible ureteroscopy for treatment of renal stones

Objectives

The management of renal stones, particularly those less than 2 cm in diameter, has changed with the development of endourological techniques, among which flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) using laser for lithotripsy has become a cornerstone. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of high pulse energy versus low pulse energy laser settings in renal stone dusting by Holmium YAG laser.

Patients and Methods

This prospective randomized study was conducted between September 2021 and November 2023 to compare the efficacy and safety of high energy versus low-energy pulse settings using a Holmium: YAG laser dusting of renal stones less than 2 cm in diameter. A total of 174 adult patients were included, divided equally into high- and low-pulse energy groups, based on the energy settings of the laser high energy (ranged from 1.2-2.5 Joules and frequency of 8 hz) and low energy (less than 0.5 Joules and frequency ≥ 15 hz) using the dusting ‎technique with non-touch non-stop approach. The study sought to evaluate the impact of these settings on stone fragmentation efficiency, operative time, laser energy consumption, and postoperative outcomes, including stone-free rates and complications.

Results

The study involved 174 patients who underwent renal stone lithotripsy and showed that using high pulse energy laser dusting settings significantly reduced operative times and more rapid dusting compared to low pulse energy settings, without affecting the stone-free rate. The study observed no significant differences in stone size or location between both groups. Minor postoperative complications were similar between both groups, indicating high pulse energy settings for lithotripsy dusting.

Conclusion

The efficacy of high pulse energy dusting in enhancing stone removal during surgery, potentially reducing operative time. Further validation through larger-scale studies is needed to solidify these findings. This technique presents a promising solution, particularly in regions with limited resources where acquiring expensive laser equipment is challenging.

Surgical Artificial Intelligence: Endourology

Endourology is ripe with information that includes patient factors, laboratory tests, outcomes, and visual data, which is becoming increasingly complex to assess. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to explore and define these relationships; however, humans might not be involved in the input, analysis, or even determining the methods of analysis. Herein, the authors present the current state of AI in endourology and highlight the need for urologists to share their proposed AI solutions for reproducibility outside of their institutions and prepare themselves to properly critique this new technology.

The optimal Holmium laser settings for disintegration of cystine and calcium oxalate monohydrate stones: In vitro study

Objective

Disintegrating cystine and calcium oxalate monohydrate stones present a formidable challenge owing to their hardness and distinct composition. This study aimed to establish optimal laser settings for these hard stones lithotripsy.

Patients and Methods

Cystine and calcium oxalate monohydrate stones were extracted from two patients. Two experiments were conducted in vitro by utilizing a 272 μm laser fiber with variable settings to disintegrate the cystine and calcium oxalate monohydrate stones. In the first experiment, energy was adjustable while frequency was constant, whereas the second experiment involved constant energy with adjustable frequency on each type of stone and each experiment was repeated three times to ensure robustness and reliability.

Results

Our findings indicated that for cystine stones, use of higher total power with high energy and low frequency proved to be effective. Conversely, for calcium oxalate monohydrate stones, settings involving higher total power with low energy and high frequency demonstrated superior efficacy and safety.

Conclusion

Holmium (Ho: YAG) laser settings with higher total power, high energy, and low frequency effectively disintegrate cystine stones despite increased heat, which was measured by a thermometer with a thermocouple. For calcium oxalate monohydrate stones, higher total power, high frequency, and low energy settings are recommended and safe.

Predicting stone composition via machine-learning models trained on intra-operative endoscopic digital images

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to use deep learning (DL) of intraoperative images of urinary stones to predict the composition of urinary stones. In this way, the laser frequency and intensity can be adjusted in real time to reduce operation time and surgical trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 490 patients who underwent holmium laser surgery during the two-year period from March 2021 to March 2023 and had stone analysis results were collected by the stone laboratory. A total of 1658 intraoperative stone images were obtained. The eight stone categories with the highest number of stones were selected by sorting. Single component stones include calcium oxalate monohydrate (W1), calcium oxalate dihydrate (W2), magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate, apatite carbonate (CH) and anhydrous uric acid (U). Mixed stones include W2 + U, W1 + W2 and W1 + CH. All stones have intraoperative videos. More than 20 intraoperative high-resolution images of the stones, including the surface and core of the stones, were available for each patient via FFmpeg command screenshots. The deep convolutional neural network (CNN) ResNet-101 (ResNet, Microsoft) was applied to each image as a multiclass classification model.

RESULTS

The composition prediction rates for each component were as follows: calcium oxalate monohydrate 99% (n = 142), calcium oxalate dihydrate 100% (n = 29), apatite carbonate 100% (n = 131), anhydrous uric acid 98% (n = 57), W1 + W2 100% (n = 82), W1 + CH 100% ( n = 20) and W2 + U 100% (n = 24). The overall weighted recall of the cellular neural network component analysis for the entire cohort was 99%.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study suggests that DL is a promising method for identifying urinary stone components from intraoperative endoscopic images. Compared to intraoperative identification of stone components by the human eye, DL can discriminate single and mixed stone components more accurately and quickly. At the same time, based on the training of stone images in vitro, it is closer to the clinical application of stone images in vivo. This technology can be used to identify the composition of stones in real time and to adjust the frequency and energy intensity of the holmium laser in time. The prediction of stone composition can significantly shorten the operation time, improve the efficiency of stone surgery and prevent the risk of postoperative infection.

How to estimate stone volume and its use in stone surgery: a comprehensive review

OBJECTIVE

Current interventional guidelines refer to the cumulative stone diameter to choose the appropriate surgical modality (ureteroscopy [URS], extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [ESWL] and percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL]). The stone volume (SV) has been introduced recently, to better estimate the stone burden. This review aimed to summarize the available methods to evaluate the SV and its use in urolithiasis treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed in December 2022 by searching Embase, Cochrane and Pubmed databases. Articles were considered eligible if they described SV measurement or the stone free rate after different treatment modalities (SWL, URS, PCNL) or spontaneous passage, based on SV measurement. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and the quality of the articles and performed the data extraction.

RESULTS

In total, 28 studies were included. All studies used different measurement techniques for stone volume. The automated volume measurement appeared to be more precise than the calculated volume. In vitro studies showed that the automated volume measurement was closer to actual stone volume, with a lower inter-observer variability. Regarding URS, stone volume was found to be more predictive of stone free rates as compared to maximum stone diameter or cumulative diameter for stones >20 mm. This was not the case for PCNL and SWL.

CONCLUSIONS

Stone volume estimation is feasible, manually or automatically and is likely a better representation of the actual stone burden. While for larger stones treated by retrograde intrarenal surgery, stone volume appears to be a better predictor of SFR, the superiority of stone volume throughout all stone burdens and for all stone treatments, remains to be proven. Automated volume acquisition is more precise and reproducible than calculated volume.

Pulsed Thulium:YAG laser - What is the lithotripsy ablation efficiency for stone dust from human urinary stones? Results from an in vitro PEARLS study

BACKGROUND

The novel pulsed thulium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (p-Tm:YAG) laser was recently introduced. Current studies present promising p-Tm:YAG ablation efficiency, although all are based on non-human stone models or with unknown stone composition. The present study aimed to evaluate p-Tm:YAG ablation efficiency for stone dust from human urinary stones of known compositions.

METHODS

Calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) and uric acid (UA) stones were subjected to lithotripsy in vitro using a p-Tm:YAG laser generator (Thulio®, Dornier MedTech GmbH, Germany). 200 J was applied at 0.1 J × 100 Hz, 0.4 J × 25 Hz or 2.0 J × 5 Hz (average 10W). Ablated stone dust mass was calculated from weight difference between pre-lithotripsy stone and post-lithotripsy fragments > 250 µm. Estimated ablated volume was calculated using prior known stone densities (COM: 2.04 mg/mm3, UA: 1.55 mg/mm3).

RESULTS

Mean ablation mass efficiency was 0.04, 0.06, 0.07 mg/J (COM) and 0.04, 0.05, 0.06 mg/J (UA) for each laser setting, respectively. This translated to 0.021, 0.029, 0.034 mm3/J (COM) and 0.026, 0.030, 0.039 mm3/J (UA). Mean energy consumption was 26, 18, 17 J/mg (COM) and 32, 23, 17 J/mg (UA). This translated to 53, 37, 34 J/mm3 (COM) and 50, 36, 26 J/mm3 (UA). There were no statistically significant differences for laser settings or stone types (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study showing ablation efficiency of the p-Tm:YAG laser for stone dust from human urinary stones of known compositions. The p-Tm:YAG seems to ablate COM and UA equally well, with no statistically significant differences between differing laser settings.

Laser Ablation Efficiency, Laser Ablation Speed, and Laser Energy Consumption During Lithotripsy: What Are They and How Are They Defined? A Systematic Review and Proposal for a Standardized Terminology

CONTEXT

Laser performance for lithotripsy is currently reported using units of measurement such as J/mm3, mm3/J, mm3/s, s/mm3, and mm3/min. However, there are no current standardized definitions or terminology for these metrics. This may lead to confusion when assessing and comparing different laser systems.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to summarize outcome values and corresponding terminology from studies on laser lithotripsy performance using stone volume in relation to time or energy. The secondary objective was to propose a standardized terminology for reporting laser performance metrics.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the search string ("j*/mm3" OR "mm3/j*" OR "mm3/s*" OR "s*/mm3" OR "mm3/min*" OR "min*/mm3" AND "lithotripsy") on Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed databases. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 28 studies were included, covering holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG), MOSES, and thulium fiber laser (TFL) technologies. Laser energy consumption values reported for the studies ranged from 2.0 - 43.5 J/mm3in vitro and from 2.7 - 47.8 J/mm3in vivo, translating to laser ablation efficiency of 0.023 - 0.500 mm3/J and 0.021 - 0.370 mm3/J, respectively. Laser ablation speeds ranged from 0.3 - 8.5 mm3/s in vivo, translating to lasing time consumption of 0.12 - 3.33 s/mm3. Laser efficacy ranged from 4.35 - 51.7 mm3/min in vivo. There was high heterogeneity for the terminology used to describe laser performance for the same metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

The range of laser performance metric values relating stone volume to energy or time is wide, with corresponding differing terminology. We propose a standardized terminology for future studies on laser lithotripsy, including laser ablation efficiency (mm3/J), laser ablation speed (mm3/s), and laser energy consumption (J/mm3). Laser efficacy (mm3/min) is proposed as a broader term that is based on the total operative time, encompassing the whole technique using the laser.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed studies to identify the units and terms used for laser performance when treating urinary stones. The review revealed a wide range of differing units, outcomes, and terms. Therefore, we propose a standardized terminology for future studies on laser stone treatment.

What to expect from the novel pulsed thulium:YAG laser? A systematic review of endourological applications

INTRODUCTION

Several preclinical studies about a novel pulsed-thulium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (p-Tm:YAG) device have been published, demonstrating its possible clinical relevance.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the reality and expectations for this new p-Tm:YAG technology. A PubMed, Scopus and Embase search were performed. All relevant studies and data identified in the bibliographic search were selected, categorized, and summarized.

RESULTS

Tm:YAG is a solid state diode-pumped laser that emits at a wavelength of 2013 nm, in the infrared spectrum. Despite being close to the Ho:YAG emission wavelength (2120 nm), Tm:YAG is much closer to the water absorption peak and has higher absorption coefficient in liquid water. At present, there very few evaluations of the commercially available p-Tm:YAG devices. There is a lack of information on how the technical aspects, functionality and pulse mechanism can be maximized for clinical utility. Available preclinical studies suggest that p-Tm:YAG laser may potentially increase the ablated stone weight as compared to Ho:YAG under specific condition and similar laser parameters, showing lower retropulsion as well. Regarding laser safety, a preclinical study observed similar absolute temperature and cumulative equivalent minutes at 43° C as compared to Ho:YAG. Finally, laser-associated soft-tissue damage was assessed at histological level, showing similar extent of alterations due to coagulation and necrosis when compared with the other clinically relevant lasers.

CONCLUSIONS

The p-Tm:YAG appears to be a potential alternative to the Ho:YAG and TFL according to these preliminary laboratory data. Due to its novelty, further studies are needed to broaden our understanding of its functioning and clinical applicability.

Ablation rates with Holmium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser: Influence of the stone phantom homogeneity. An in vitro study

OBJECTIVES

The lithotripsy efficiency (LE) in vitro study requires artificial or human stone samples (AS, HS). With the development of dusting lithotripsy, less ex vivo HS are available. We aimed to compare Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) and Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG)'s LE and define the most accurate LE parameter.

METHODS

Hard and soft homogenous- and heterogenous-AS (Ho-AS, He-AS) were made to reproduce calcium-oxalate monohydrate and uric acid stones, respectively by a rapid or slow brewing of BegostonePlus (Bego) and distilled water. One hundred and fifty and 272μm-laser fibers, connected to 50W-TFL and 30W-HoYAG generators, compared three settings for TFL (FD: 0.15J/100Hz; D: 0.5J/30Hz; Fr: 1J/15Hz) and two for Ho:YAG (D-Fr). An experimental setup consisted in immerged 10mm cubic stone phantoms with a 20 seconds' lasing spiral, in contact mode, repeated four times. Stones were dried, weighted and μ-scanned (ablation weight and volume [AW and AV]).

RESULTS

With He-AS, dusting AV were four- and three-fold higher with TFL compared to Ho:YAG against hard and soft (P<0.05). In fragmentation, AV were two-fold higher with TFL compared to Ho:YAG against hard (P<0.05) and soft (P<0.05). Experiments with Ho-AS were associated with non-significant differences when comparing TFL-150μm and TFL-272μm. The ablation weight-volume correlation coefficients was higher with Ho-AS than with He-AS (P<0.0001), and with hard than soft AS. If the LE can be estimated by the AW with hard AS, this approximation is not consistent for soft AS.

CONCLUSION

TFL presented higher ablation rates than Ho:YAG, significant with He-AS. If the AW is acceptable and less expensive for hard Ho-AS, AV are more accurate for He-AS, which are suggested to imitate closely HS.

Autofluorescence spectral analysis for detecting urinary stone composition in emulated intraoperative ambient

The prevalence and disease burden of urolithiasis has increased substantially worldwide in the last decade, and intraluminal holmium laser lithotripsy has become the primary treatment method. However, inappropriate laser energy settings increase the risk of perioperative complications, largely due to the lack of intraoperative information on the stone composition, which determines the stone melting point. To address this issue, we developed a fiber-based fluorescence spectrometry method that detects and classifies the autofluorescence spectral fingerprints of urinary stones into three categories: calcium oxalate, uric acid, and struvite. By applying the support vector machine (SVM), the prediction accuracy achieved 90.28 % and 96.70% for classifying calcium stones versus non-calcium stones and uric acid versus struvite, respectively. High accuracy and specificity were achieved for a wide range of working distances and angles between the fiber tip and stone surface in an emulated intraoperative ambient. Our work establishes the methodological basis for engineering a clinical device that achieves real-time, in situ classification of urinary stones for optimizing the laser ablation parameters and reducing perioperative complications in lithotripsy.

A Practical Guide for Intra-Renal Temperature and Pressure Management during Rirs: What Is the Evidence Telling Us

INTRODUCTION

One of the main limitations of Ho:YAG lithotripsy is represented by its advancement speed. The need for faster lithotripsy has led to the introduction of high-power laser equipment. This general trend in increasing Ho:YAG lithotripsy power has certain points that deserve to be considered and analyzed. The objective is to carry out a narrative review on intrarenal temperature and pressure during ureteroscopy.

METHODS

A literature search using PUBMED database from inception to December 2021 was performed. The analysis involved a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Using more power in the laser correlates with an increase in temperature that can be harmful to the kidney. This potential risk can be overcome by increasing either the irrigation inflow or outflow. Increasing irrigant flow can lead to high intrarenal temperature (IRP). The factors that allow the reduction of intrarenal pressure are a low irrigation flow, the use of a ureteral access sheath of adequate diameter according to the equipment used, and the occupation of the working channel by the laser or basket.

CONCLUSION

To maintain a safe temperature profile, it has been proposed to use chilled irrigation fluid, intermittent laser activation or to increase irrigation flow. This last recommendation can lead to increased IRP, which can be overcome by using a UAS. Another option is to use low power laser configurations in order to avoid temperature increases and not require high irrigation flows.

Comparison of low power and high power holmium YAG laser settings in flexible ureteroscopy

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of conventional low power and high power holmium: yttrium aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser lithotripsy settings during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).  METHODS: The prospective study was conducted in patients undergoing RIRS for renal stones less than 2 cm diameter. Pulsed Ho:YAG laser (Lumenis^® Pulse TM P120 H) was used for laser lithotripsy and the patients were randomized into low power (LP) and high power (HP) laser lithotripsy settings groups. The lasing duration, total laser energy used (Joules), laser energy used to ablate 1 mm³ of stone (Joules/mm³), operative duration, stone ablation speed (mm³/s) and stone free rate were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 120 underwent RIRS with 63 and 57 patients in LP and HP group, respectively. Median stone volume and stone density were comparable between the groups. The total energy used and laser energy used to ablate 1mm³ of stone (Joules/mm³) were significantly higher in the HP group than in LP group (27.9 (16.4-46.2) J/ mm³ vs 9.7 (5.3-17.7) J/ mm³) (p < 0.01). Median (IQR) ablation speed were 0.8 (0.5-1.3) mm³/s and 0.6 (0.4-1) mm³/s in the LP and HP groups, respectively. The median lasing time, operative time and stone free rate were similar in both the groups.

CONCLUSION

The total energy used and J/mm³ were lower in the LP group than in HP group with similar lasing duration, operative duration, ablation speed and stone free rate for renal stones less than 2 cm.

Role of low- versus high-power laser in the treatment of lower pole stones: prospective non-randomized outcomes from a university teaching hospital

Introduction:

Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation [flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURSL)] has risen over the last two decades. Laser technology has also evolved over the time, shifting from low- to high-power lasers with the addition of MOSES technology that allows for ‘dusting and pop-dusting’ of stones. The aim of the study was to look at the outcomes of FURSL in lower pole stones (LPS) using low- and high-power lasers.

Patient and Methods:

In this study, we compared the outcomes of low-power holmium laser (group A, 20 W) and high-power holmium laser (group B, including both 60 W MOSES integrated system and 100 W lasers) for all patients with LPS treated with laser lithotripsy. Data were collected for patient demographics, stone location, size, pre- and postoperative stent, length of stay, complications and stone free rate (SFR).

Results:

A total of 284 patients who underwent FURSL procedure for LPS were analysed (168 group A, 116 group B). Outcomes showed that compared with group A, group B had a higher SFR (91.6% versus 96.5%, p = 0.13) and shorter operative time (52 versus 38 min, p < 0.001). The median length of stay was <24 h in all groups (day-case procedures). The complication rate was comparable between the two groups but with more infectious complications (n = 7) noted in group A compared with group B (n = 3) (p = 0.53).

Conclusion:

Compared with low-power laser, the use of high-power laser for LPS significantly reduced the use of ureteral access sheath (UAS), postoperative stent and procedural time. Although non-statistically significant, the SFR was higher in the high-power group even for relatively larger stone sizes, which was also reflected in a reduction of sepsis-related complication rates with these lasers.

Cavitation Plays a Vital Role in Stone Dusting During Short Pulse Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotripsy

Objective: To investigate the mechanism of stone dusting in Holmium (Ho): YAG laser lithotripsy (LL). Materials and Methods: Cylindrical BegoStone samples (6 × 6 mm, H × D) were treated in water using a clinical Ho:YAG laser lithotripter in dusting mode (0.2-0.4 J with 70-78 μs in pulse duration, 20 Hz) at various fiber tip to stone standoff distances (SD = 0, 0.5, and 1 mm). Stone damage craters were quantified by optical coherence tomography and bubble dynamics were captured by high-speed video imaging. To differentiate the contribution of cavitation vs thermal ablation to stone damage, three additional experiments were performed. First, presoaked wet stones were treated in air to assess stone damage without cavitation. Second, the laser fiber was advanced at various offset distances (OSD = 0.25, 1, 2, 3, and 10 mm) from the tip of a flexible ureteroscope to alter the dynamics of bubble collapse. Third, stones were treated with parallel fiber to minimize photothermal damage while isolating the contribution of cavitation to stone damage. Results: Treatment in water resulted in 2.5- to 90-fold increase in stone damage compared with those produced in air where thermal ablation dominates. With the fiber tip placed at OSD = 0.25 mm, the collapse of the bubble was distracted away from the stone surface by the ureteroscope tip, leading to significantly reduced stone damage compared with treatment without the scope or with scope at large OSD of 3-10 mm. The average crater volume produced by parallel fiber orientation at 0.2 J after 100 pulses, where cavitation is the dominant mechanism of stone damage, was comparable with those produced by using perpendicular fiber orientation within SD = 0.25-1 mm. Conclusion: Cavitation plays a dominant role over photothermal ablation in stone dusting during short pulse Ho:YAG LL when 10 or more pulses are delivered to the same location.

Laser Fiber Displacement Velocity during Tm-Fiber and Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Introducing the Concept of Optimal Displacement Velocity

BACKGROUND

Endocorporeal laser lithotripsy (EL) during flexible ureteroscopy (URS-f) often uses "dusting" settings with "painting" technique. The displacement velocity of the laser fiber (LF) at the stone surface remains unknown and could improve EL's ablation rates. This in vitro study aimed to define the optimal displacement velocity (ODV) for both holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (Tm-Fiber).

METHODS

A 50W-TFL (IRE Polus^®, Moscow, Russia) and a 30W-MH1-Ho:YAG laser (Rocamed^®, Signes, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France), were used with 272 µm-Core-Diameter LF (Sureflex, Boston Scientific^©, San Jose, CA, USA), comparing three TFL modes, "fine dusting" (FD: 0.05-0.15 J/100-600 Hz); "dusting" (D: 0.5 J/30-60 Hz); "fragmentation" (Fr: 1 J/15-30 Hz) and two Ho:YAG modes (D: 0.5 J/20 Hz, Fr: 1 J/15 Hz). An experimental setup consisting of immerged cubes of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stone phantoms (Begostone Plus, Bego^©, Lincoln, RI, USA) was used with a 2 s' laser operation time. LF were in contact with the stones, static or with a displacement of 5, 10 or 20 mm. Experiments were repeated four times. Stones were dried and µ-scanned. Ablation volumes (mm³) were measured by 3D-segmentation.

RESULTS

ODV was higher in dusting compared to fragmentation mode during Ho:YAG lithotripsy (10 mm/s vs. 5 mm/s, respectively). With Tm-Fiber, dusting and fragmentation OVDs were similar (5 mm/s). Tm-Fiber ODV was lower than Ho:YAGs in dusting settings (5 mm/s vs. 10 mm/s, respectively). Without LF displacement, ablation volumes were at least two-fold higher with Tm-Fiber compared to Ho:YAG. Despite the LF-DV, we report a 1.5 to 5-fold higher ablation volume with Tm-Fiber compared to Ho:YAG.

CONCLUSIONS

In dusting mode, the ODV^Tm-Fiber is lower compared to ODV^Ho:YAG, translating to a potential easier Tm-Fiber utilization for "painting" dusting technique. The ODV determinants remain unknown. Dynamic ablation volumes are higher to static ones, regardless of the laser source, settings or LF displacement velocity.

Reply letter to: Majdalany SE, Levin BA, Ghani KR. The Efficiency of Moses Technology Holmium Laser for Treating Renal Stones

Reply letter.

Prediction models of low-power holmium laser effectiveness in renal stone lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery

The objectives of this study are to develop prediction models for total laser energy (TLE) in order to infer surgical time and assist operative planning of intrarenal low-power Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy, and to predict the fragmented volume as well as the stone-free status (SFS). A retrospective review was performed, comprising all single surgeon standardized retrograde intrarenal surgery and low-power Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy at a tertiary care centre between October 2014 and September 2019. Automated measurement of stone volume and stone density (MSD), measured in Hounsfield units (HU), was employed in both pre- and post-operative non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT), using a standardized technique on Osirix Lite® software. SFS was defined as complete absence of stone fragments, or fragments < 0.1 cm on meticulous inspection at the end of the procedure, and residual stone burden < 0.0005 cm³ on postoperative NCCT at 3 months. Statistical analysis was performed using the STATA® version 13.1 software for regression models. A p value < .05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 100 patients met the inclusion criteria, requiring a median of 22.3 kJ/cm³ (13.4-36.0) and resulting in a SFS of 41% at 3 months. In a multivariate analysis, according to stone composition, predicted TLE is equal: for uric acid (UA), 11.17 × volume(cm³) + 0.17 × MSD(HU) + 7.48 kJ; for mixed stones, 11.17 × volume(cm³) + 0.17 × MSD(HU) + 6.26 kJ; for calcium oxalate monohydrate (CaOM) stones, 11.17 × volume(cm³) + 0.17 × MSD(HU) + 1.14 kJ; and for calcium phosphate (CaPh) stones 11.17 × volume(cm³) + 0.17 × MSD(HU) - 1.94 kJ. Predicted fragmented volume is equal to 0.93 × volume(cm³) cm³. The significant predictors for SFS were UA stones, the presence of multiple stones, and lower TLE. In clinical practice, our models for intrarenal low-power Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy indicate that larger, denser, and UA stones are associated to higher TLE, and that single and UA stones are more commonly associated to SFS. Since higher TLE means longer operative time, when adjusting for laser parameters, our prediction models may help urologists plan surgeries more precisely based on stone characteristics, ultimately optimizing patients' treatment.

Evaluation of a free 3D software for kidney stones' surgical planning: "kidney stone calculator" a pilot study

Introduction

Kidney Stone Calculator (KSC) is a free, three-dimensional (3D) planning software for flexible ureteroscopy(fURS) with Holmium:YAG(Ho:YAG) endocorporeal lithotripsy (EL). KSC provides the stone volume (SV) and expected duration of lithotripsy (ExDL) estimations based on non-enhanced-CT scan (NECT) DICOM series. We aimed to provide a preclinical and clinical evaluation of KSC.

Patients and methods

A preclinical evaluation measured the SV by three operators (resident, endourology expert and research engineer) among 17 NECT cases. Between January and March 2020, a multicentric, prospective, observational double-blind clinical evaluation was conducted in patients presenting with renal stones treated with Ho:YAG-EL during fURS and preoperative NECT. Demographic and surgical data were collected. The primary endpoint was a significant median difference between ExDL and EffectiveDL (EfDL). Second, efficiency (J/mm³) and efficacy (mm³/min) ratios were calculated.

Results

The preclinical evaluation showed no significant difference in the SV measurements among operators (p > 0.05). Pearson and Kendall coefficients of 0.99 and 0.98, respectively, were found. Twenty-six patients were included in the clinical evaluation, with a median age of 55 years. In 66% of cases, there was a single stone located in the lower pole, with a density > 1000 Hounsfield Unit observed in 42% and 85% of cases. A 14% [Q1–Q3 (5.4–24.8); p = 0.36] median difference between ExDL and EfDL was noted, which was greater in the case of lower pole stones with no possible relocation (p = 0.008). Median values of 17.6 J/mm³ and 0.4 (0.32–0.56) mm³/s EL were also noted.

Conclusions

Kidney Stone Calculator is a reproducible and accurate software that allows for an estimation of the stone burden and provides an ExDL for URSf. Defining the influencing factors of EL will improve its ExDL.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03671-z.

Superpulsed Thulium Fiber Laser for Stone Dusting: In Search of a Perfect Ablation Regimen-A Prospective Single-Center Study

Objective: To compare the efficacy of the standard and higher frequency regimens for superpulsed thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and Methods: A prospective study of patients with renal calculi of 10-30 mm was performed. For RIRS, we used the SP TFL (NTO IRE-Polus, Russia) and a 9.5F flexible ureteroscope with 270° deflection and 3.6F working channel. Retropulsion and visibility were assessed based on the surgeon's feedback using three-point Likert scales. The stone-free rate was assessed at 3 months with CT. Results: A total of 40 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 56 years, mean stone density of 880 ± 381 HU, mean stone size of 16.5 ± 6.8 mm, and median stone volume of 883 (interquartile range 606-1664) mm³. Both ablation efficacy and speed were higher in the 200-Hz mode (2.7 J/mm³ vs 3.8 J/mm³ and 5.5 mm³/second vs 8.0 mm³/second, respectively); moreover, the higher frequency correlated with increased ablation speed (r = -0.21, p = 0.019). However, both increased energy and frequency did not lead to increase of laser-on time or intraoperative complication rates. Conclusions: SP TFL is able to effectively disintegrate stones during RIRS with minimal complication rates. The use of higher frequency regimens showed higher efficacy and ablation speed and was not associated with increased complication rates.