1
|
Gao B, Gorgen ARH, Bhatt R, Tano ZE, Morgan KL, Vo K, Zarandi SS, Ali SN, Jiang P, Patel RM, Clayman RV, Landman J. Avoiding "Needless" nephrectomy: What is the role of small renal mass biopsy in 2024? Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00422-8. [PMID: 38643022 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Current guidelines do not mandate routine preoperative renal mass biopsy (RMB) for small renal masses (SRMs), which results in a considerable rate (18%-26%) of needless nephrectomy/partial nephrectomy for benign renal tumors. In light of this ongoing practice, a narrative review was conducted to examine the role of routine RMB for SRM. First, arguments justifying the current non-biopsy approach to SRM are critically reviewed and contested. Second, as a standalone procedure, RMB is critically assessed; RMB was found to have higher sensitivity, specificity, and an equal or lower complication rate when compared with other commonly preoperatively biopsied solid organ tumors (e.g., breast, prostate, lung, pancreas, thyroid, and liver). Based on the foregoing information, we propose a paradigm shift in SRM management, advocating for an updated policy in which partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy for SRM invariably occurs only after a preoperative biopsy confirms that a SRM is indeed malignant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Gao
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA.
| | | | - Rohit Bhatt
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Zachary E Tano
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Kalon L Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Kelvin Vo
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | | | - Sohrab N Ali
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Pengbo Jiang
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Roshan M Patel
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Ralph V Clayman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Jaime Landman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lavasani SAM, Rojhani A, Cumpanas AD, Osann K, Morgan KL, Hernandez MC, McCormac A, Piedras P, Vo K, Gorgen ARH, Sharifi SHH, Gao BM, Tano ZE, Patel RM, Landman J, Clayman RV. Surgical Force: Initial Study and Clinical Implications in the Assessment of Ureteral Access Sheath Induced Injury. J Endourol 2024; 38:316-322. [PMID: 38243836 DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) pose the risk of severe ureteral injury. Our prior studies revealed forces ≤6 Newtons (N) prevent ureteral injury. Accordingly, we sought to define the force urologists and residents in training typically use when placing a UAS. Materials and Methods: Among urologists and urology residents attending two annual urological conferences in 2022, 121 individuals were recruited for the study. Participants inserted 12F, 14F, and 16F UAS into a male genitourinary model containing a concealed force sensor; they also provided demographic information. Analysis was completed using t-tests and Chi-square tests to identify group differences when passing a 16F sheath UAS. Participant traits associated with surpassing or remaining below a minimal force threshold were also explored through polychotomous logistic regression. Results: Participant force distributions were as follows: ≤4N (29%), >6N (45%), and >8N (32%). More years of practice were significantly associated with exerting >6N relative to forces between 4N and 6N; results for >8N relative to 4N and 8N were similar. Compared to high-volume ureteroscopists (those performing >20 ureteroscopies/month), physicians performing ≤20 ureteroscopies/month were significantly less likely to exert forces ≤4N (p = 0.017 and p = 0.041). Of those surpassing 6N and 8N, 15% and 18%, respectively, were high-volume ureteroscopists. Conclusions: Despite years of practice or volume of monthly ureteroscopic cases performed, most urologists failed to pass 16F access sheaths within the ideal range of 4N to 6N (74% of participants) or within a predefined safe range of 4N to 8N (61% of participants).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allen Rojhani
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Andrei D Cumpanas
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Kathryn Osann
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Kalon L Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Mariah C Hernandez
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Amanda McCormac
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Paul Piedras
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Kelvin Vo
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Antonio R H Gorgen
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | | | - Bruce M Gao
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Zachary E Tano
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Roshan M Patel
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Jaime Landman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Ralph V Clayman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tano ZE, Cumpanas AD, Gorgen ARH, Rojhani A, Altamirano-Villarroel J, Landman J. Surgical Artificial Intelligence: Endourology. Urol Clin North Am 2024; 51:77-89. [PMID: 37945104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Endourology is ripe with information that includes patient factors, laboratory tests, outcomes, and visual data, which is becoming increasingly complex to assess. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to explore and define these relationships; however, humans might not be involved in the input, analysis, or even determining the methods of analysis. Herein, the authors present the current state of AI in endourology and highlight the need for urologists to share their proposed AI solutions for reproducibility outside of their institutions and prepare themselves to properly critique this new technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary E Tano
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, 3800 West Chapman Avenue, Suite 7200, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
| | - Andrei D Cumpanas
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, 3800 West Chapman Avenue, Suite 7200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Antonio R H Gorgen
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, 3800 West Chapman Avenue, Suite 7200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Allen Rojhani
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, 3800 West Chapman Avenue, Suite 7200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Jaime Altamirano-Villarroel
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, 3800 West Chapman Avenue, Suite 7200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Jaime Landman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, 3800 West Chapman Avenue, Suite 7200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cumpanas AD, Chantaduly C, Morgan KL, Shao W, Gorgen ARH, Tran CM, Wu YX, McCormac A, Tano ZE, Patel RM, Chang P, Landman J, Clayman RV. Efficient and Accurate Computed Tomography-Based Stone Volume Determination: Development of an Automated Artificial Intelligence Algorithm. J Urol 2024; 211:256-265. [PMID: 37889957 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Given the shortcomings of current stone burden characterization (maximum diameter or ellipsoid formulas), we sought to investigate the diagnostic accuracy and precision of a University of California, Irvine-developed artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for determining stone volume determination. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 322 noncontrast CT scans were retrospectively obtained from patients with a diagnosis of urolithiasis. The largest stone in each noncontrast CT scan was designated the "index stone." The 3D volume of the index stone using 3D Slicer technology was determined by a validated reviewer; this was considered the "ground truth" volume. The AI-calculated index stone volume was subsequently compared with ground truth volume as well with the scalene, prolate, and oblate ellipsoid formulas estimated volumes. RESULTS There was a nearly perfect correlation between the AI-determined volume and the ground truth (R=0.98). While the AI algorithm was efficient for determining the stone volume for all sizes, its accuracy improved with larger stone size. Moreover, the AI stone volume produced an excellent 3D pixel overlap with the ground truth (Dice score=0.90). In comparison, the ellipsoid formula-based volumes performed less well (R range: 0.79-0.82) than the AI algorithm; for the ellipsoid formulas, the accuracy decreased as the stone size increased (mean overestimation: 27%-89%). Lastly, for all stone sizes, the maximum linear stone measurement had the poorest correlation with the ground truth (R range: 0.41-0.82). CONCLUSIONS The University of California, Irvine AI algorithm is an accurate, precise, and time-efficient tool for determining stone volume. Expanding the clinical availability of this program could enable urologists to establish better guidelines for both the metabolic and surgical management of their urolithiasis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei D Cumpanas
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Chanon Chantaduly
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Kalon L Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Wei Shao
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Antonio R H Gorgen
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Candices Minh Tran
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Yi Xi Wu
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Amanda McCormac
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Zachary E Tano
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Roshan M Patel
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Peter Chang
- Center for Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Jaime Landman
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Ralph V Clayman
- Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Piedras P, Cumpanas AD, McCormac A, Lavasani SAM, Gorgen ARH, Rojhani A, Vu MC, Bhatt R, Asplin J, Tano ZE, Landman J, Clayman RV, Patel RM. Alkaline Water: Help or Hype for Uric Acid and Cystine Urolithiasis? J Urol 2024; 211:276-284. [PMID: 38193415 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The consumption of alkaline water, water with an average pH of 8 to 10, has been steadily increasing globally as proponents claim it to be a healthier alternative to regular water. Urinary alkalinization therapy is frequently prescribed in patients with uric acid and cystine urolithiasis, and as such we analyzed commercially available alkaline waters to assess their potential to increase urinary pH. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five commercially available alkaline water brands (Essentia, Smart Water Alkaline, Great Value Hydrate Alkaline Water, Body Armor SportWater, and Perfect Hydration) underwent anion chromatography and direct chemical measurements to determine the mineral contents of each product. The alkaline content of each bottle of water was then compared to that of potassium citrate (the gold standard for urinary alkalinization) as well as to other beverages and supplements used to augment urinary citrate and/or the urine pH. RESULTS The pH levels of the bottled alkaline water ranged from 9.69 to 10.15. Electrolyte content was minimal, and the physiologic alkali content was below 1 mEq/L for all brands of alkaline water. The alkali content of alkaline water is minimal when compared to common stone treatment alternatives such as potassium citrate. In addition, several organic beverages, synthetic beverages, and other supplements contain more alkali content than alkaline water, and can achieve the AUA and European Association of Urology alkali recommendation of 30 to 60 mEq per day with ≤ 3 servings/d. CONCLUSIONS Commercially available alkaline water has negligible alkali content and thus provides no added benefit over tap water for patients with uric acid and cystine urolithiasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Piedras
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Andrei D Cumpanas
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Amanda McCormac
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | | | - Antonio R H Gorgen
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Allen Rojhani
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Minh-Chau Vu
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Rohit Bhatt
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - John Asplin
- Litholink Corporation, Labcorp, Ithasca, Illinois
| | - Zachary E Tano
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Jaime Landman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Ralph V Clayman
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Roshan M Patel
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gorgen ARH, Araldi M, de Oliveira Paludo A, da Silva AGT, Ghissi AJ, Fernandes AS, Tavares P, Rosito TE, Cabral RD. Laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty using the Flexdex® articulating needle driver: step-by-step video. J Pediatr Urol 2019; 15:421-422. [PMID: 31431350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Revised: 12/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stenosis is the most common cause of pathological neonatal hydronephrosis. UPJ obstruction may be treated conservatively in some cases, but surgery is indicated if symptoms occur or renal function deteriorates. Pyeloplasty is the procedure of choice for UPJ stenosis. Pyeloplasty can be performed by open laparoscopic or robotic technique. The laparoscopic technique is safe and may be associated with shorter length of hospital stay and reduced complications. Lately, robotic pyeloplasty has been performed with similar results, adding the benefits of easier suturing maneuverability, but with increased costs. Flexdex® is a laparoscopic articulating needle driver that improves maneuverability and ergonomics. In this video, a laparoscopic pyeloplasty with the Flexdex® needle drive is described. The case was treated without any intraoperative complications and with no significant blood loss, and the patient was discharged the day after the procedure. After 90 days of follow-up, there were no complications reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R H Gorgen
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
| | - M Araldi
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - A de Oliveira Paludo
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - A G T da Silva
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - A J Ghissi
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - A S Fernandes
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - P Tavares
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - T E Rosito
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Paulo Gama, 110, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - R D Cabral
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Grupo de Urologia Reconstrutiva e Infantil (GURI), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|