Robotic RPLND for stage IIA/B nonseminoma: the Princess Margaret Experience

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage 2a/b non-seminomatous germ cell tumour

OBJECTIVES

To reassess the role of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with marker-negative non-seminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT) clinical stage (CS) 2a, to explore results in patients with CS 2b and to evaluate surgical methods, recurrence, and adjuvant chemotherapy indications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 17 institutions were collected, comprising 305 men who underwent primary RPLND for CS 2 NSGCT. Regression analyses were conducted to predict histology in the RPLND specimen and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A larger retroperitoneal lymph node diameter was associated with pure teratoma in the RPLND specimen (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07; P = 0.03), but no association was observed with DFS. The 5-year DFS rates in marker negative CS 2a and 2b were 79% and 76%. In men with non-teratomatous viable cancer in the RPLND specimen, the 5-year DFS rates for CS 2a and 2b were 95% and 87% with adjuvant chemotherapy, and 67% and 74% without adjuvant chemotherapy. We did not identify an association between the number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests considering primary RPLND not only in marker-negative CS 2a but also in CS 2b. Further research should determine the efficacy of primary RPLND in men with CS 2c and marker-positive CS 2, as well as which patients may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and the optimal cycle number.

Propensity-matched Analysis of Open Versus Robotic Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II Testicular Cancer

BACKGROUND

Open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) is the accepted standard surgical approach to treat retroperitoneal nodal disease in testis cancer. Increasingly, robotic RPLND (R-RPLND) is being performed due to the potential for lower blood loss, shorter length of stay, and accelerated recovery.

OBJECTIVE

We have performed a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis comparing the survival and perioperative outcomes of O- and R-RPLND.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Analyzing the data from all patients who underwent primary RPLND at our center between 1990 and 2022, we used PSM to create a 2:1 (O-RPLND:R-RPLND) matched cohort.

INTERVENTION

Primary O-RPLND versus R-RPLND.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was time to relapse. The secondary endpoints included operating time, length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical complications. Relapse-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used to compare perioperative outcomes of O-RPLND versus R-RPLND.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 178 patients underwent primary RPLND: 137 O-RPLND and 41 R-RPLND. After PSM, 26 patients in the R-RPLND group were matched with 38 in the O-RPLND group. After matching, no significant baseline differences were noted. After a median follow-up of 23.5 mo (interquartile range 4.4-59.2), one (3.8%) relapse was noted in the R-RPLND group versus three (7.8%) in the O-RPLND group; however, this was not significant (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.07-6.31, p = 0.7097). No in-field relapses occurred in either cohort. R-RPLND was associated with a shorter length of stay (1 vs 5 d, p < 0.0001) and lower EBL (200 vs 300 ml, p = 0.032), but longer operative time (8.8 vs 4.3 h, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

R-RPLND offers low morbidity and improved perioperative outcomes, while maintaining oncologic efficacy of the open approach.

PATIENT SUMMARY

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare open and robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) using a propensity score-matched system. We encourage the discussion and inclusion of primary R-RPLND into the standard of care algorithm for patients with de novo clinical stage (CS) II and relapsed CS I with CS II equivalent disease.

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IIA/B Metastatic Seminoma: Results of the COlogne Trial of Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy In Metastatic Seminoma (COTRIMS)

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy are recommended treatment options in marker-negative clinical stage (CS) IIA/B seminoma. Despite high cure rates of 82-94%, both therapeutic options are associated with significant long-term toxicities.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility, oncological efficacy, and treatment-associated morbidity of primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) in CS IIA/B seminoma.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective, single-arm, clinical phase 2 trial including CS IIA/B seminoma patients was conducted.

INTERVENTION

Primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Relapse-free and overall survival, surgery-associated complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and Kaplan-Meier methods for survival calculation were assessed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Thirty patients at a mean age of 39.1 (34-52) yr with marker-negative CS IIA and IIB seminomas were recruited. The median follow-up was 22 (8-30) mo. Nineteen (63%) and 11 (36%) patients were diagnosed with stages IIA and B, respectively, at the time of primary diagnosis. Fourteen (47%) and 16 (53%) patients were diagnosed with CS IIA and IIB, respectively, at the time of nsRPLND. Twenty-seven and three patients underwent open and robot-assisted nsRPLND, respectively. The median operating room time was 125 (115-145) min, median blood loss was <150 ml, and median time of hospitalization was 4.5 (3-9) d. Four (13%) patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade 3a complications. Lymph node histology revealed seminoma in 25 (80%) patients; two and three patients demonstrated embryonal carcinoma and benign disease, respectively. Sixteen patients underwent a serum analysis of miR371 preoperatively, which predicted metastatic disease in 12/13 and benign histology in 3/3 patients. Three of 30 (10%) patients developed an outfield relapse 4, 6, and 9 mo postoperatively and were salvaged by systemic chemotherapy. Limitations are the low patient number and length of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The nsRPLND approach results in a high cure rate at midterm follow-up and is associated with a low frequency of treatment-associated morbidities, making this approach a feasible alternative to radiation therapy or systemic chemotherapy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The standard treatment of clinical stage IIA/B seminomas is radiation therapy or chemotherapy, which results in a significantly increased frequency of long-term toxicity and secondary neoplasms. In this trial, we demonstrate that nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is a feasible therapeutic approach with low morbidity and high oncological efficacy.

Comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for non-seminomatous germ cell tumor: a single-center retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To compare the perioperative outcomes of L-RPLND, R-RPLND and O-RPLND, and determine which one can be the mainstream option.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 47 patients undergoing primary RPLND by three different surgical techniques for stage I-II NSGCT between July 2011 and April 2022 at our center. Standard open and laparoscopic RPLND was performed with usual equipment, and robotic RPLND was operated with da Vinci Si system.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients underwent RPLND during 2011-2022, and 26 (55.3%) of them received L-RPLND, 14 (29.8%) were operated with robot, while 7 (14.9%) were performed O-RPLND. The median follow-up was 48.0 months, 48.0 months, and 60.0 months, respectively. The oncological outcomes were comparable among all groups. In L-RPLND group, there were 8 (30.8%) cases of low grade (Clavien I-II) complications, and 3 (11.5%) cases of high-grade (Clavien III-IV) complications. In R-RPLND group, one (7.1%) low-grade complication and four (28.6%) high-grade complications were observed. In O-RPLND group, there were 2 (28.5%) cases of low-grade complications and one case (14.2%) of high-grade one. The operation duration of L-RPLND was the shortest. In O-RPLND group, the number of positive lymph nodes were higher than other two groups. Patients undergoing open surgery had lower (p < 0.05) red blood cell count, hemoglobin level, and higher (p < 0.05) estimated blood loss, white blood cell count than those receiving either laparoscopic or robotic surgery.

CONCLUSION

All three surgical techniques are comparable in safety, oncological, andrological, and reproductive outcomes under the circumstance of not using primary chemotherapy. L-RPLND might be the most cost-effective option.

Postchemotherapy robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for non-seminomatous germ cell tumors in the lateral decubitus position: oncological and functional outcomes

PURPOSE

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is recommended for residual masses following chemotherapy for non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). Recently, aberrant recurrence patterns were reported in patients who underwent robotic RPLND. We aimed to evaluate perioperative safety in addition to functional and early oncological outcomes of postchemotherapy robotic RPLND (pcR-RPLND) for NSGCT.

METHODS

A total of 25 patients with NSGCT who underwent a pcR-RPLND between January 2011 and June 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were provided for demographics, clinical characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative parameters. Functional and oncological outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 28.9 years (IQR 21.5-32.4). The median retroperitoneal tumor size was 2.6 cm (IQR 1.5-3.5). Intraoperative complications occurred in only one case and the open conversion rate was 12%. There were seven cases with postoperative complications (Clavien grade II: 5 and IIIa: 2). Patients were followed for a median of 33.2 months (IQR 14.8-43.0). Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in 85.7% of the patients. Two patients (8%) relapsed and both had out-of-field recurrences at unusual sites (perinephric fat and omentum). Of those, one patient died (4%) of testicular cancer.

CONCLUSION

pcR-RPLND is a feasible and technically reproducible procedure with favorable perioperative morbidity, low rate of complications, and acceptable postoperative ejaculatory function. Although the recurrence rate was low (8%), recurrences were observed at unusual sites. Further studies are required to investigate any association between the robotic approach and aberrant recurrence patterns.