Brain natriuretic peptide as a potential novel marker of salt-sensitivity in chronic kidney disease patients without cardiac dysfunction

Association of Longitudinal B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Monitoring With Kidney Failure in Patients With CKD: A Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Both hypervolemia and hypovolemia are associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Although longitudinal monitoring of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) may aid physicians' decision making about the optimization of volume status, its clinical benefit remains uncertain in CKD. This study assessed the association between BNP monitoring and the risk of incident kidney replacement therapy (KRT).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2,998 outpatients with stages 3-5 of nondialyzed CKD referred to the department of nephrology at an academic hospital.

EXPOSURE

BNP monitoring.

OUTCOME

KRT, acute kidney injury (AKI), and heart failure hospitalization.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Marginal structural models, which create a balanced pseudo population at each time point, were applied to account for potential time-dependent confounders. Inverse probability weighted pooled logistic regression models were employed to estimate hazard ratios.

RESULTS

At baseline, the median age and estimated glomerular filtration rate were 66 years and 38.1mL/min/1.73m2, respectively. During the follow-up period (median, 5.9 [IQR, 2.8-9.9] years), 449 patients required KRT, 765 had AKI, and 236 were hospitalized for heart failure. After adjustment for time-updated clinical characteristics and physician-specific practice styles, BNP monitoring was associated with lower risks of KRT (HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.21-0.92]), AKI (HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.18-0.72]), and heart failure hospitalization (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14-0.95]). The association between BNP monitoring and KRT was attenuated after additional adjustment for AKI or heart failure hospitalization as a time-varying covariate.

LIMITATIONS

Residual confounding by measured and unmeasured variables or indications for BNP measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

BNP monitoring was associated with a lower risk of KRT among patients with CKD that did not require dialysis. This association is potentially mediated through a reduced risk of AKI or heart failure hospitalization.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Both volume overload and volume depletion are deleterious to kidney function. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a biomarker that reflects volume status not only in heart failure but also in nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although longitudinal BNP monitoring may aid physicians' decision making about the optimization of volume status, its clinical benefit remains uncertain in CKD. In this cohort study analyzing 2,998 patients with nondialyzed CKD, BNP monitoring was associated with a lower risk of kidney replacement therapy, acute kidney injury, and heart failure hospitalization over the follow-up period. The association with kidney replacement therapy may be mediated through a reduced risk of acute kidney injury or heart failure hospitalization. BNP monitoring may aid physicians in optimal fluid management, potentially conferring better kidney outcomes.

NT-proBNP as a Potential Marker of Cardiovascular Damage in Children with Chronic Kidney Disease

Assessing cardiovascular disease (CVD) in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is difficult. Great expectations have been associated with biomarkers, including the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). This study aimed to determine the correlation between NT-proBNP and cardiovascular complications in children with CKD. Serum NT-proBNP, arterial stiffness, common carotid artery intima-media thickness (cIMT), echocardiographic (ECHO) parameters (including tissue Doppler imaging), and biochemical and clinical data were analyzed in 38 pediatric patients with CKD (21 boys, 12.2 ± 4.2 years). Mean NT-proBNP in CKD patients was 1068.1 ± 4630 pg/mL. NT-proBNP above the norm (125 pg/mL) was found in 16 (42.1%) subjects. NT-proBNP correlated with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (r = -0.423, p = 0.008), and was significantly higher in CKD G5 (glomerular filtration rate grade) patients compared to CKD G2, G3, and G4 children (p = 0.010, p = 0.004, and p = 0.018, respectively). Moreover, NT-proBNP correlated positively with augmentation index (AP/PP: r = 0.451, p = 0.018, P2/P: r = 0.460, p = 0.016), cIMT (r = 0.504, p = 0.020), and E/E' in ECHO (r = 0.400, p = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, logNT-proBNP was the only significant predictor of cIMT Z-score (beta = 0.402, 95CI (0.082-0.721), p = 0.014) and P2/P1 (beta = 0.130, 95CI (0.082-0.721), p = 0.014). Conclusions: NT-proBNP may serve as a possible marker of thickening of the carotid artery wall in pediatric patients with CKD. The final role of NT-proBNP as a biomarker of arterial damage, left ventricular hypertrophy, or cardiac diastolic dysfunction in CKD children needs confirmation in prospective studies.