Real-world use of intravascular ultrasound in Japan: a report from contemporary multicenter PCI registry

Postdilatation after stent deployment during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The utilization of postdilatation in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is feared to induce suboptimal coronary blood flow and compromise the outcome of the patients. This meta-analysis sought to verify whether postdilatation during primary PCI is associated with worse angiographic or long-term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were conducted on PubMed, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, EBSCO, and Europe PMC on 10 March 2024. Eligible studies reporting the outcomes of postdilatation among ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were included. The primary outcome was no-reflow condition during primary PCI based on angiographic finding. The secondary clinical outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) comprising all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

Ten studies were finally included in this meta-analysis encompassing 3280 patients, which was predominantly male (76.6%). Postdilatation was performed in 40.7% cases. Postdilatation was associated with increased risk of no-reflow during primary PCI [Odd Ratio (OR) = 1.33, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.12-1.58; P = .001)]. Conversely, postdilatation had a tendency to reduce MACE (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.51-0.97; P = .03) specifically in terms of TVR (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74; P = .003). No significant differences between both groups in relation to mortality (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.32-1.05; P = .07) and myocardial infarction (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 0.78-2.89; P = .22).

CONCLUSIONS

Postdilatation after stent deployment during primary PCI appears to be associated with an increased risk of no-reflow phenomenon after the procedure. Nevertheless, postdilatation strategy has demonstrated a significant reduction in MACE over the course of long-term follow-up. Specifically, postdilatation significantly decreased the occurrence of TVR. Key messages: What is already known on this topic?  Optimizing stent deployment by performing postdilatation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is essential for long-term clinical outcomes. However, its application during primary PCI is controversial due to the fact that it may provoke distal embolization and worsen coronary blood flow. What this study adds?  In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 studies, we confirm that postdilatation during primary PCI is associated with worse coronary blood flow immediately following the procedure. On the contrary, this intervention proves advantageous in improving long-term clinical outcomes, particularly in reducing target vessel revascularization. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy?  Given the mixed impact of postdilatation during primary PCI, this strategy should only be applied selectively. Future research should focus on identifying patients who may benefit from such strategy.

Comparison of Intravascular Imaging, Functional, or Angiographically Guided Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it remains unclear whether intravascular imaging guidance or functional guidance is the best strategy to optimize outcomes and if the results are different in patients with vs without acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes with imaging-guided PCI or functionally guided PCI when compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI.

METHODS

We searched PUBMED and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials investigating outcomes with intravascular imaging-guided, functionally guided, or angiography-guided PCI. The primary outcome from this network meta-analysis was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)-a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). PCI strategies were ranked (best to worst) using P scores.

RESULTS

Our search identified 32 eligible randomized controlled trials and included a total of 22,684 patients. Compared with angiography-guided PCI, intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with reduced risk of MACE (relative risk [RR]: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.62-0.82), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.42-0.75), MI (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.66-0.99), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31-0.73), and TLR (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57-0.99). Similarly, when compared with angiography-guided PCI, functionally guided PCI was associated with reduced risk of MACE and MI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI ranked first for the outcomes of MACE, cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis, and TLR. The results were consistent in the ACS and non-ACS cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiography-guided PCI had consistently worse outcomes compared with intravascular imaging-guided and functionally guided PCI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was the best strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.

State-of-art review: intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary interventions

The history of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) reflects the relentless pursuit of innovation in interventional cardiology. These intravascular imaging technologies have played a pivotal role in our understanding of coronary atherosclerosis, vascular pathology, and the interaction of coronary stents with the vessel wall. Two decades of clinical investigations demonstrating the clinical efficacy and safety of intravascular imaging modalities have established these technologies as staples in the contemporary cardiac catheterization lab's toolbox and earning their place in revascularization clinical practice guidelines. In this comprehensive review, we will delve into the historical evolution, mechanisms, and technical aspects of IVUS and OCT. We will discuss the expanding evidence supporting their use in complex percutaneous coronary interventions, emphasizing their crucial roles in optimizing patient outcomes and ensuring procedural success. Furthermore, we will explore the substantial advances that have propelled these imaging modalities to the forefront of contemporary interventional cardiology. Finally, we will survey the latest developments in the field and explore the promising future directions that have the potential to further revolutionize coronary interventions.

Intracoronary Imaging Versus Coronary Angiography Guidance for Implantation of Second and Third Generation Drug Eluting Stents in a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Intracoronary imaging (ICI) facilitates stent implant by characterizing the lesion calcification, providing accurate vessel dimensions, and optimizing the stent results. We sought to investigate the outcomes of routine ICI versus coronary angiography (CA) to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second- and third-generation drug-eluting stents. A systematic search of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases was conducted from their inception to July 16, 2022 for randomized controlled trials comparing routine ICI with CA. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. The secondary outcomes of interest were target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and cardiac and all-cause mortality. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled incidence and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 9 randomized controlled trials with 5,879 patients (2,870 ICI-guided and 3,009 CA-guided PCI) met the inclusion criteria. The ICI and CA groups were similar in demographic characteristics and co-morbidity profiles. Compared with CA, patients in the routine ICI-guided PCI group had lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78, p <0.0001), target lesion revascularization (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.83, p = 0.002), target vessel revascularization (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.00, p = 0.05), and myocardial infarction (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.95, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in stent thrombosis or cardiac/all-cause mortality between the 2 strategies. In conclusion, routine ICI-guided PCI strategy, compared with CA guidance alone, is associated with improved clinical outcomes, largely driven by lower repeat revascularization.

Accuracy of IVUS-Based Machine Learning Segmentation Assessment of Coronary Artery Dimensions and Balloon Sizing

Background

Accurate intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements are important in IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization by choosing the appropriate device size and confirming stent expansion.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of machine learning (ML) automatic segmentation of coronary artery vessel and lumen dimensions and balloon sizing.

Methods

Using expert analysis as the gold standard, ML segmentation of 60 MHz IVUS images was developed using 8,076 IVUS cross-sectional images from 234 patients, which were randomly split into training (83%) and validation (17%) data sets. The performance of ML segmentation was then evaluated using an independent test data set (437 images from 92 patients). The endpoints were the agreement rate between ML vs experts' measurements for appropriate balloon size selection, and lumen and acute stent areas. Appropriate balloon size was determined by rounding down from the mean vessel diameter or rounding up from the mean lumen diameter to the next balloon size. The difference of lumen area ≥0.5 mm2 was considered as clinically significant.

Results

ML model segmentation correlated well with experts' segmentation for training data set with a correlation coefficient of 0.992 and 0.993 for lumen and vessel areas, respectively. The agreement rate in lumen and acute stent areas was 85.5% and 97.0%, respectively. The agreement rate for appropriate balloon size selection was 70.6% by vessel diameter only and 92.4% by adding lumen diameter.

Conclusions

ML model IVUS segmentation measurements were well-correlated with those of experts and selected an appropriate balloon size in more than 90% of images.

Assessment of Nonfatal Bleeding Events as a Surrogate for Mortality in Coronary Artery Disease

Background

Bleeding events are frequently applied as safety end points for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of antithrombotic agents in patients with coronary artery disease. However, whether a bleeding event is a valid surrogate for death remain uncertain.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the correlation between the treatment effect on bleeding events and mortality.

Methods

Multiple databases were searched to identify RCTs studying antithrombotic agents for patients with coronary artery disease through August 2022. Major and minor bleeding events were defined in included trials, mostly defined with BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) or TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) criteria. Trial-level correlations between nonfatal bleeding events and mortality were assessed. We performed subgroup analyses by the definitions of bleeding (BARC vs TIMI criteria), study year, and follow-up duration. We used a cutoff with a lower limit of 95% confidence interval of R2 >0.72 as a strong correlation and with an upper limit of 95% confidence interval of R2 <0.50 as a weak correlation.

Results

A total of 48 RCTs with 181,951 participants were analyzed. Overall, trial-level R2 for major and minor bleeding were 0.09 (95% CI: 0.00-0.26) and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.00-0.27) for all-cause or cardiovascular death, respectively. When confined to major bleeding, R2 were 0.03 (95% CI: 0.00-0.13) and 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.05), respectively. All of the subgroup analyses did not show any significant correlations.

Conclusions

We demonstrated a trial-defined bleeding event may not be a valid surrogate for mortality in RCTs investigating the effect of antithrombotic agents for coronary artery disease.

Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A report from multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention registry

BACKGROUND

High mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors [SMuRFs (e.g. diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and dyslipidemia)] has been reported. However, details regarding their acute presentation and reasons for the excess risk remain unclear.

METHOD

Patient-level data were extracted from a multicenter procedure-based registry (KiCS-PCI). We analyzed consecutive patients with ACS who underwent de novo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2009 and 2020. The primary outcome of interest was the in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among the 10,523 patients with ACS, 7775 met the inclusion criteria. Patients without SMuRFs who underwent PCI [n = 529 (6.8 %)] were older [median 71 (IQR: 63-79) vs. 68 (59-76) years, p < 0.001] and more often presented with cardiogenic shock or cardiopulmonary arrest (14.6 % vs. 8.6 %, p < 0.001; 12.7 % vs. 5.3 %, p < 0.001, respectively). In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), median door-to-balloon time was significantly longer in SMuRF-less patients (90 min vs 82 min). In-hospital death was significantly higher in SMuRF-less patients [10.2 % vs. 4.1 %, p < 0.001, adjusted odds ratio, 1.81 (95%CI, 1.26-2.59); p = 0.001], whereas the rate of procedural complications showed no significant difference. When stratified by the ACS presentation pattern, the findings were consistent, although the association between SMuRF-less and the increased risk of in-hospital mortality was not statistically significant in patients with non-ST-elevation- (NSTE)-ACS.

CONCLUSIONS

SMuRF-less ACS patients frequently presented with cardiopulmonary arrest and/or cardiogenic shock, leading to high in-hospital mortality. When stratified by the ACS presentation pattern, the association of SMuRF-less and the increased risk of mortality was more prominent in STEMI patients and it was not statistically significant in NSTE-ACS patients. Almost half of these patients had amendable left main trunk or left anterior descending artery disease and treating clinicians should be aware of this paradox to avoid the delay in treatment.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Stable Coronary Artery Disease Following the ISCHEMIA Trial

Until recently, coronary revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention has been regarded as the standard choice for stable coronary artery disease (CAD), particularly for patients with a significant burden of ischemia. However, in conjunction with remarkable advances in adjunctive medical therapy and a deeper understanding of its long-term prognosis from recent large-scale clinical trials, including ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches), the approach to stable CAD has changed drastically. Although the updated evidence from recent randomized clinical trials will likely modify the recommendations for future clinical practice guidelines, there are still unresolved and unmet issues in Asia, where prevalence and practice patterns are markedly different from those in Western countries. Herein, the authors discuss perspectives on: 1) assessing the diagnostic probability of patients with stable CAD; 2) application of noninvasive imaging tests; 3) initiation and titration of medical therapy; and 4) evolution of revascularization procedures in the modern era.

Impact of the adjunctive use criteria for intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and clinical outcomes

The impact of the adherence to the adjunctive use criteria (AUC) for intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and clinical outcomes in low IVUS volume countries are limited. The current study compared the procedural success and complication rates between used and not used IVUS catheter in the patients who were met (C +) and were not met (C-) the AUC for IVUS-guided PCI. From June 2018 through June 2019, a total of 21,066 patients were included in the Thai PCI registry. Among the study population, 15,966 patients (75.8%) have met the IVUS-AUC. The IVUS-guided PCI rates were 14.5% and 11.3% in the C + and C - groups, respectively. After adjusting for covariables by propensity model, IVUS-guided PCI was identified as an independent predictor of the procedural success rate regardless of whether the AUC were met with the relative risk [RR (95% confidence interval (CI)] of 1.033(1.026-1.040) and 1.012(1.002-1.021) in C + and C- groups, respectively. IVUS-guided PCI increased the procedural complication risks in both groups but were not significant with corresponding RRs of 1.171(0.915-1.426) and 1.693(0.959-2.426). Procedural success was achieved with IVUS-guided PCI regardless of whether the AUC were met. IVUS-guided PCI did not lead to an increase in procedural complications.

[Penetration of endocoronary imaging in France (data from France PCI): The French exception]

PURPOSE

Evaluate intravascular coronary imaging (ICI) utilization in France and compare it with other countries.

METHODOLOGY

We included in our study all PCI performed between 2014 and 2021 in all participating centers of France PCI registry.

RESULTS

The percentage of ICI use during PCI varied from 1.2% to 1% between 2014 and 2020 in the France PCI Registry. In 2021, among 45,227 PCI procedures performed at the 41 participating centers, 768 (1.7%) had an ICI, including 329 (0.7%) with OCT, 341 (0.8%) with IVUS, and 98 (0.2%) undetermined. In "all-comers" PCI, the rate of ICI use was 1.7% in France, 2.5% in the United States, 10% in Sweden, 16.2% in the United Kingdom, and 84.4% in Japan. In left main PCI, the rate was 5.8% in France, 62.3% in Sweden, 66.6% in the UK, and 96.6% in Japan. In the France PCI registry, the rate of ICI use ranged from 0% to 9.5% in all PCI and from 0% to 30% in left main PCI.

CONCLUSION

ICI techniques are exceptionally used in France in routine practice, in contrast to our European neighbors such as Swede or the United Kingdom. Obtaining reimbursement in certain recommended indications and participation in a national interventional cardiology registry with incentive practice indicators should improve this situation.

Rates of Intracoronary Imaging Optimization in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the BMC2 Registry

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary imaging (ICI) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes, yet hospital- and physician-level variabilities in ICI and its impact on ICI use in contemporary PCI remain unknown. This study was performed to evaluate hospital- and physician-level use of ICI to optimize PCI.

METHODS

Using data from a large statewide registry, patients undergoing PCI between July 2019 and March 2021 were studied. The primary measure of interest was ICI (intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography) optimization during PCI. A fitted hierarchical Bayesian model identified variables independently associated with ICI optimization. The performing hospital and physician were included as random effects in the model.

RESULTS

Among 48 872 PCIs, ICI optimization was performed in 8094 (16.6%). Median [interquartile range] hospital- and physician-level frequencies of ICI were 8.8% [3.1%, 16.0%] and 6.1% [1.1%, 25.0%], respectively. Bayesian modeling identified left main PCI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.41; 95% credible interval [3.82, 5.10]), proximal left anterior descending artery PCI (aOR, 2.28 [2.00, 2.59]), PCI for in-stent restenosis (aOR, 1.55 [1.40, 1.72]), and surgical consult prior to PCI (aOR, 1.21 [1.07, 1.37]) as independent predictors of ICI optimization. The hospital-level median odds ratio, an estimate of the contribution of inter-hospital variability in odds of ICI use, was 3.48 (2.64, 5.04). Physician-level median odds ratio was 3.81 (3.33, 4.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial hospital- and physician-level variation in ICI was observed. Except for performance of left main PCI, the hospital and physician performing the PCI were more strongly associated with ICI optimization than any patient or procedural factors.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With and Without Intravascular Ultrasound for Patients With Complex Lesions: Utilization, Mortality, and Target Vessel Revascularization

BACKGROUND

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has several benefits during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), including more accurate vessel sizing, improved stent expansion, and better strut apposition. Prior clinical trials have demonstrated a reduction in cardiac events when IVUS is used. However, there is limited information about the utilization of IVUS and the outcomes of IVUS-guided versus angiography-guided PCI in patients with complex lesions in a contemporary population-based setting.

METHODS

New York's PCI registry was used to identify 44 305 patients with complex lesions (lesions that complicate stenting or that require multiple stents) undergoing PCI with and without IVUS guidance and discharged between December 1, 2013 and November 30, 2018. Trends and inter-hospital variation in IVUS use were examined. Risk-adjusted mortality and target vessel revascularization were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 6174 (13.9%) PCI patients underwent IVUS-guided PCI. The median follow-up period was 2.5 years. The percent of patients with complex lesions who underwent IVUS-guided PCI rose from 13.4% in 2014 to 16.5% in 2018 (P<0.0001 for trend), with the main increases occurring in the last 2 years of the period. Only 31 of 66 hospitals in the study used IVUS for >5% of their study patients. IVUS-guided PCI patients experienced significantly lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio=0.89 [0.79-0.98] after adjustment using a Cox proportional hazards model, and HR=0.88 [0.78-0.99] for propensity-matched patients). We also found that IVUS-guided PCI patients had a lower rate of target vessel revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio=0.88 [0.80-0.97]) after adjusting using Cox proportional hazards with competing risk of mortality and after propensity matching (0.88 [0.79-0.99]).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of IVUS for complex lesions has increased but contemporary rates remain low, and there are large inter-hospital variations. The use of IVUS for complex lesions was associated with lower risk of medium-term mortality and target vessel revascularization.

Overview of in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with the revived directional coronary atherectomy

OBJECTIVES

We sought to provide clinical insights on the usage rate, indications, and in-hospital outcomes of the revived directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) catheter (Atherocut™) in a Japanese nationwide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry.

BACKGROUND

Debulking devices such as the revived DCA catheter have become increasingly important in the era of complex PCI. However, little is known about PCI outcomes using a novel DCA catheter in contemporary real-world practice.

METHODS

We analyzed 188,324 patients who underwent PCI in 1112 hospitals from January to December 2018. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease or unstable angina who underwent PCI with or without the DCA were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 1696 patients (0.9%) underwent PCI with the DCA during the study period, predominantly for left main trunk or proximal left anterior descending artery lesions under a transfemoral approach. Patients in the DCA group were younger and had fewer comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease than patients in the non-DCA group. Stentless PCI using the DCA with drug-coated balloon angioplasty was a preferred treatment strategy in the DCA group (50.0%). Predefined in-hospital adverse outcomes, including mortality (0.2% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.446) and periprocedural complications (1.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.697), were comparable between the two groups, whereas the fluoroscopy time was longer and the total contrast volume was higher in the DCA group.

CONCLUSIONS

In Japan, PCI using the revived DCA catheter is safely performed with low complication rates in patients with stable coronary artery disease or unstable angina.

Use of intravascular ultrasound and long-term cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients receiving current generation drug-eluting stents

Long-term follow-up data on differential effects of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) according to lesion complexity are limited in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The current study compared long-term clinical outcomes between IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI in patients with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). Between February 2008 and December 2015, 5488 patients undergoing PCI with second-generation DES were recruited from an institutional registry of Samsung Medical Center. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI) during 46 months of median follow-up (interquartile range: 32–102 months). IVUS-guided PCI was performed in 979 patients (17.8%). IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiac death or MI compared with angiography-guided PCI (5.7% vs. 12.9%, hazard ratio 0.408, 95% confidence interval 0.284–0.587, p < 0.001). Results were consistent after propensity score matching analysis with 801 matched pairs. In subgroup analysis, there was no significant interaction between lesion complexity (defined by complex procedures, P_interaction = 0.819, ACC/AHA lesion classification, P_interaction = 0.401 or SYNTAX score, P_interaction = 0.149) and use of IVUS for risk of cardiac death or MI. IVUS-guided second-generation DES implantation was associated with a significantly lower long-term risk of cardiac death or MI compared with angiography guidance, regardless of lesion complexity.

Machine learning prediction model of acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. The traditional risk model provided by the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) is useful for predicting the preprocedural risk of AKI, although the scoring system requires a number of clinical contents. We sought to examine whether machine learning (ML) techniques could predict AKI with fewer NCDR-AKI risk model variables within a comparable PCI database in Japan. We evaluated 19,222 consecutive patients undergoing PCI between 2008 and 2019 in a Japanese multicenter registry. AKI was defined as an absolute or a relative increase in serum creatinine of 0.3 mg/dL or 50%. The data were split into training (N = 16,644; 2008-2017) and testing datasets (N = 2578; 2017-2019). The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using the light gradient boosting model (GBM) with selected variables by Lasso and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) methods among 12 traditional variables, excluding the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, since its use was considered operator-dependent. The incidence of AKI was 9.4% in the cohort. Lasso and SHAP methods demonstrated that seven variables (age, eGFR, preprocedural hemoglobin, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction/unstable angina, heart failure symptoms, and cardiogenic shock) were pertinent. AUC calculated by the light GBM with seven variables had a performance similar to that of the conventional logistic regression prediction model that included 12 variables (light GBM, AUC [training/testing datasets]: 0.779/0.772; logistic regression, AUC [training/testing datasets]: 0.797/0.755). The AKI risk model after PCI using ML enabled adequate risk quantification with fewer variables. ML techniques may aid in enhancing the international use of validated risk models.

Clinical Outcomes and Prevalence of Intravascular Ultrasound Use at a Tertiary Care Hospital in a South Asian Country

Objectives:

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) plays a pivotal role in the current era of coronary interventions. We aimed to determine the prevalence of IVUS use and clinical outcomes of IVUS-guided percutaneous treatment of coronary arteries lesions in a South Asian country.

Material and Methods:

It is a retrospective observational study, a total of 134 consecutive patients having done IVUS, was enrolled from January 2013 to March 2020 at a single center.

Results:

Out of 134 patients, 97 (72.4%) were male with a mean age of 63.1 ± 12.9 years. The prevalence of IVUS in our center was 3.0%. The most frequent comorbidity observed was dyslipidemia, n = 111 (82.8%). Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, n = 50 (37.3%), was the common mode of presentation. On coronary angiogram, the left main (LM) disease was found in n = 46 (34.3%), however, single-vessel disease, n = 51 (38.1%), was most commonly noted. IVUS utilization was higher in the left anterior descending, n = 94 (70.1%), followed by LM, n = 46 (34.3%). The LM mean minimal luminal area was 6.0 ± 2.6 mm² and minimal luminal diameter was 4.53 mm ± 0.6 (mean). The coronary artery dissection was noted in n = 15 (11.2%). The mean duration of follow-up in our study was 40.3 ± 30.1 months. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were recorded in n = 13 (9.7%), which included heart failure, n = 4 (3%). Cardiovascular death and target vessel revascularization occurred in n = 3 (2.2%).

Conclusion:

IVUS results in a significant decrease in MACE. Our data might support the broader use of IVUS in both developed and in our part of the world.

Clinical outcomes for intracoronary imaging strategies at different medical facilities in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease: the SAKURA imaging PCI Registry

The relationships between intracoronary imaging modalities and outcomes among Japanese patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) based on the type of medical facility providing outpatient care remain unclear. In this multicenter prospective study (SAKURA PCI Registry), we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with CAD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between April 2015 and December 2018. In this registry, we investigated differences in patient characteristics, intracoronary imaging modalities, and clinical outcomes between two types of medical facilities. Of the 414 patients enrolled in this registry, 196 were treated at two university hospitals, and 218 were treated at five community hospitals (median follow-up 11.0 months). The primary endpoint was clinically relevant events (CREs), including a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding. Patients treated at university hospitals had higher rates of diabetes (50% vs. 38%, p = 0.015) and malignant tumors (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.015) and more frequent use of multiple intracoronary imaging modalities than patients treated at community hospitals (21% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier incidence of CREs at 1 year was comparable between university hospitals and community hospitals (8.8% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.527, log-rank test). Despite the relatively higher risk among patients in university hospitals with frequent use of multi-intracoronary imaging modalities, adverse clinical events appeared to be comparable between patients with CAD treated at university and community hospitals in Japan.

Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary Stenting With and Without Use of Intravascular Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to explore if intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use in real-world patients is associated with improved long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

The benefit of IVUS use with PCI in real world is uncertain.

METHODS

We identified Medicare patients who underwent PCI from 2009 to 2017 and evaluated the association of IVUS use with long-term risk of mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization. We used propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting to adjust for baseline characteristics. To account for hospital effects, patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI were matched to non-IVUS patients in the same hospital and year. Sensitivity analyses comparing outcomes with and without IVUS in stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome, PCI with bare-metal stents and drug-eluting stents, complex and noncomplex PCI, and facilities with 1% to 5%, 5% to 10%, and >10% IVUS use were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, IVUS was used in 5.6% of all PCI patients (105,787 out of 1,877,177 patients). Patients with IVUS-guided PCI had a higher prevalence of most comorbidities. In the propensity matched analysis, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with lower 1-year mortality (11.5% vs. 12.3%), MI (4.9% vs. 5.2%), and repeat revascularization (6.1% vs. 6.7%) (p < 0.001 for all). In inverse probability weighting analysis with a median follow-up of 3.7 years (interquartile range: 1.7 to 6.4 years), IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.903; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.885 to 0.922), MI (aHR: 0.899; 95% CI: 0.893 to 0.904), and repeat revascularization (aHR: 0.893; 95% CI: 0.887 to 0.898) (p < 0.001 for all). These findings were consistent in all subgroups in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this contemporary U.S. Medicare cohort, the use of IVUS guidance in PCI remains low. Use of IVUS is associated with lower long-term mortality, MI, and repeat revascularization.

Factors Influencing Stent Failure in Chronic Total Occlusion Coronary Intervention

Stent failure remains one of the greatest challenges for interventional cardiologists. Despite the evolution to superior second- and third-generation drug-eluting stent designs, increasing use of intracoronary imaging and the adoption of more potent antiplatelet regimens, registries continue to demonstrate a prevalence of stent failure or target lesion revascularisation of 15-20%. Predisposition to stent failure is consistent across both chronic total occlusion (CTO) and non-CTO populations and includes patient-, lesion- and procedure-related factors. However, histological and pathophysiological properties specific to CTOs, alongside complex strategies to treat these lesions, may potentially render percutaneous coronary interventions in this cohort more vulnerable to failure. Prevention requires recognition and mitigation of the precipitants of stent failure, optimisation of interventional techniques, including image-guided precision percutaneous coronary intervention, and aggressive modification of a patient's cardiovascular risk factors. Management of stent failure in the CTO population is technically challenging and itself begets recurrence. We aim to provide a comprehensive review of factors influencing stent failure in the CTO population and strategies to attenuate these.

Usefulness of ultrasound-guided intraluminal approach for long occlusive femoropopliteal lesion

To investigate the usefulness of ultrasound-guided (USG) intraluminal approach for femoropopliteal (FP) lesion. 64 patients (73 limbs) with de novo long occlusive (> 15 cm) FP lesions underwent USG intralumial approach from April 2012 to October 2016. Periprocedural intravascular ultrasound findings were collected. Clinical outcome and predictors of restenosis after USG intraluminal approach for de novo long occlusive FP lesion were investigated. Among the study participants, 34% were female, 50% had diabetes mellitus, and 10% received hemodialysis. Lesion and chronic total occlusion (CTO) lengths were 222 ± 55 mm and 201 ± 55 mm, respectively. Procedural success was achieved in 72 lesions (99%). Distal puncture was performed in 7 limbs (10%). The proportion of within-CTO intraplaque, subintimal, and medial routes were 87 ± 21%, 9 ± 15%, and 4 ± 11%, respectively. Primary patency was 71% and 69% at 1 and 2 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that within-CTO intraplaque route proportion [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.98, p = 0.0339] and lesion length (HR 1.11; CI 1.00-1.22; p = 0.0447) were independent predictors of restenosis.USG intraluminal approach facilitated acquisition of within-CTO intraplaque route in long occlusive FP lesions and could improve clinical outcome.

In-hospital outcomes of angiography versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

Background

We compared the in-hospital complications, outcomes, cost, and length of stay (LOS) between angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the USA.

Methods

A nationwide inpatient database was queried to identify patients >18 years with STEMI who underwent angiography-guided and IVUS-guided PCI from January 2016 to December 2016. We compared the in-hospital mortality, complications, cost, and LOS between the two groups.

Results

We identified 100,485 patients who underwent angiography-guided PCI and 5,460 patients who underwent IVUS-guided PCI. In-hospital mortality was not statistically different (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.46 − 1.22, P = 0.24). Patients who underwent PCI with IVUS were more likely to have coronary artery dissection (OR 4.26, 95% CI 2.34 − 7.7, p = <0.01), and both groups had a similar incidence of acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. The mean LOS was similar, but the mean total cost was higher in the group that underwent PCI under IVUS guidance.

Conclusions

The in-hospital mortality, hemodialysis, and the use of support devices did not reach a statistical difference between the two groups. However, we observed higher rates of coronary dissection with the use of IVUS in STEMI management.

Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves patient survival (mortality) after drug-eluting stent implantation: review and updated bibliography

Individual studies IVUS vs angiography-guided DES implantation studies, whether randomized clinical trials or registries are underpowered, to show a reduction in mortality, especially at 1 year of follow-up. However, either meta-analyses or the few studies with long-term (> 5 year) follow-up showed that IVUS guidance reduced mortality and improved patient survival, even with second-generation DES.