Association of renal resistance index and arterial stiffness on clinical outcomes in patients with mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction and presence or absence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Arterial Stiffness and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is prevalent and associated with a poor prognosis, imposing a significant burden on society. Arterial stiffness is increasingly recognized as a crucial factor in the pathophysiology of HFpEF, affecting diagnosis, management, and prognosis. As a hallmark of vascular aging, arterial stiffness contributes to increased afterload on the left ventricle (LV), leading to diastolic dysfunction, a key feature of HFpEF. Elevated arterial stiffness is linked with common cardiovascular risk factors in HFpEF, such as hypertension, diabetes and obesity, exacerbating the progression of disease. Studies have demonstrated that patients with HFpEF exhibit significantly higher levels of arterial stiffness compared to those without HFpEF, highlighting the value of arterial stiffness measurements as both diagnostic and prognostic tools. Moreover, interventions aimed at reducing arterial stiffness, whether through pharmacological therapies or lifestyle modifications, have shown potential in improving LV diastolic function and patient outcomes. Despite these advancements, the precise mechanisms by which arterial stiffness contributes to HFpEF are still not fully understood, necessitating the need for further research.

Estimated pulse wave velocity predicts mortality in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV), a newly established arterial stiffness (AS) parameter, predicts the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and death in the general population or in patients with CVD risk factors. However, whether ePWV is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients remains unknown. Our study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of ePWV on clinical outcomes in HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed HFpEF participants from the Americas in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial with available baseline data (n = 1764). Cox proportional hazard model was used to explore the prognostic value of ePWV on long-term clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and heart failure hospitalization). Each ePWV increase by 1 m/s increased the risk for all-cause death by 16% (HR:1.16; 95% CI:1.10-1.23; P < 0.001) and CVD mortality by 13% (HR:1.13; 95% CI:1.04-1.21; P = 0.002) after adjusting for confounders. Patients were then grouped into 4 quartiles of ePWV. Our study indicated that the highest ePWV quartile (ePWV ≥ 12.806 m/s) was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.43-2.69; P < 0.001) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.16-2.56; P = 0.008) after adjusting for potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

These results suggested ePWV is independently associated with increased all-cause mortality and CVD mortality in HFpEF patients, indicating ePWV is an appropriate predictor of prognosis in patients with HFpEF.

Reimagining the Value of Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity as a Biomarker of Cardiovascular Disease Risk-A Call to Action on Behalf of VascAgeNet

This review critiques the literature supporting clinical assessment and management of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular disease risk stratification with brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV). First, we outline what baPWV actually measures-arterial stiffness of both large central elastic arteries and medium-sized muscular peripheral arteries of the lower limb. Second, we argue that baPWV is not a surrogate for carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. While both measures are dependent on the properties of the aorta, baPWV is also strongly dependent on the muscular arteries of the lower extremities. Increased lower-extremity arterial stiffness amplifies and hastens wave reflections at the level of the aorta, widens pulse pressure, increases afterload, and reduces coronary perfusion. Third, we used an established evaluation framework to identify the value of baPWV as an independent vascular biomarker. There is sufficient evidence to support (1) proof of concept; (2) prospective validation; (3) incremental value; and (4) clinical utility. However, there is limited or no evidence to support (5) clinical outcomes; (6) cost-effectiveness; (8) methodological consensus; or (9) reference values. Fourth, we address future research requirements. The majority of the evaluation criteria, (1) proof of concept, (2) prospective validation, (3) incremental value, (4) clinical utility and (9) reference values, can be supported using existing cohort datasets, whereas the (5) clinical outcomes and (6) cost-effectiveness criteria require prospective investigation. The (8) methodological consensus criteria will require an expert consensus statement. Finally, we finish this review by providing an example of a future clinical practice model.

Current Insights into the Significance of the Renal Resistive Index in Kidney and Cardiovascular Disease

Initially, the renal resistive index (RRI) was investigated with the aim of improving diagnosis in kidney diseases, but this goal was not met. Recently, many papers have highlighted the prognostic significance of the RRI in chronic kidney disease: specifically, in estimating the revascularization success of renal artery stenoses or the evolution of the graft and the recipients in renal transplantation. Moreover, the RRI has become significant in the prediction of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Studies in renal pathology have revealed correlations of this index with parameters of systemic circulation. The theoretical and experimental premises of this connection were then reconsidered, and studies analyzing the link between RRI and arterial stiffness, central and peripheral pressure, and left ventricular flow were conducted with this purpose. Many data currently indicate that RRI is influenced more by pulse pressure and vascular compliance than by renal vascular resistance-assuming that RRI reflects the complex interplay between systemic circulation and renal microcirculation and should be considered a marker of systemic cardiovascular risk beyond its prognostic relevance for kidney disease. In this review, we overview the clinical research that reveals the implications of RRI in renal and cardiovascular disease.

Association Between Arterial Stiffness and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality in the world. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for about half of all heart failure. Unfortunately, the mechanisms of HFpEF are still unclear, leading to little progress of effective treatment of HFpEF. Arterial stiffness is the decrement of arterial compliance. The media of large arteries degenerate in both physiological and pathological conditions. Many studies have proven that arterial stiffness is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disorders including diastolic dysfunction. In this perspective, we discussed if arterial stiffness is related to HFpEF, and how does arterial stiffness contribute to HFpEF. Finally, we briefly summarized current treatment strategies on arterial stiffness and HFpEF. Though some new drugs were developed, the safety and effectiveness were not adequately assessed. New pharmacologic treatment for arterial stiffness and HFpEF are urgently needed.

Prognostic significance of diastolic blood pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Although systolic blood pressure (SBP) is routinely considered when treating acute heart failure (HF), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is hardly been assessed in the situation. There are no previous studies regarding the predictive value of DBP in elderly patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in Japan. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of DBP in patients with acute decompensated HFpEF. We analyzed data of all HFpEF patients admitted to Shinonoi General Hospital for HF treatment between July 2016 and December 2018. We excluded patients with acute coronary syndrome and severe valvular disease. Patients were divided into two groups according to their median DBP; the low DBP group (DBP ≤ 77 mmHg, n = 106) and the high DBP group (DBP > 77 mmHg, n = 100). The primary outcome was HF readmission. In 206 enrolled patients (median 86 years), during a median follow-up of 302 days, the primary outcome occurred in 48 patients. The incidence of HF readmission was significantly higher in the low DBP group (33.0% vs 18.5%, p = 0.024). In Kaplan–Meier analysis, low DBP predicted HF readmission (Log-rank test, p = 0.013). In Cox proportional hazard analysis, low DBP was an independent predictor of HF readmission after adjustment for age, sex, SBP, hemoglobin, serum albumin, serum creatinine, B-type natriuretic peptide, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary artery disease, and whether they live alone (hazard ratio, 2.229; 95% confidence interval, 1.021–4.867; p = 0.044). Low DBP predicted HF readmission in patients with HFpEF.