Effect of pulmonary vein isolation on rotor/multiple wavelet dynamics in persistent atrial fibrillation, association with vagal response and implications for adjunctive ablation

Distributions and number of drivers on real-time phase mapping associated with successful atrial fibrillation termination during catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Real-time phase mapping (ExTRa™) is useful in determining the strategy of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to investigate the features of drivers of AF associated with its termination during ablation.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients who underwent catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal AF using online real-time phase mapping (ExTRa™) were enrolled. A significant AF driver was defined as an area with a non-passively activated ratio of ≥ 50% on mapping analysis in the left atrium (LA). All drivers were simultaneously evaluated using a low-voltage area, complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE), and rotational activity by unipolar electrogram analysis. The electrical characteristics of drivers were compared between patients with and without AF termination during the procedure.

RESULTS

Twelve patients achieved AF termination during the procedure. The total number of drivers detected on the mapping was significantly lower (4.4 ± 1.6 vs. 7.4 ± 3.8, p = 0.007), and the drivers were more concentrated in limited LA regions (2.8 ± 0.9 vs. 3.9 ± 1.4, p = 0.009) in the termination group than in the non-termination group. The presence of drivers 2-6 with limited (≤ 3) LA regions showed a tenfold increase in the likelihood of AF termination, with 83% specificity and 67% sensitivity. Among 231 AF drivers, the drivers related to termination exhibited a greater overlap of CFAE (56.8 ± 34.1% vs. 39.5 ± 30.4%, p = 0.004) than the non-related drivers. The termination group showed a trend toward a lower recurrence rate after ablation (p = 0.163).

CONCLUSIONS

Rotors responsible for AF maintenance may be characterized in cases with concentrated regions and fewer drivers on mapping.

Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a novel substrate-based radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective, randomised, parallel-controlled, single-blinded study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, a single ablation strategy does not always achieve the desired therapeutic effect in all patients with persistent AF, and individualised strategies are required for different clinical characteristics.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study aimed to determine the optimal catheter ablation strategy for persistent AF by comparing the efficacy of PVI and BCXL (BC: big circles encircling pulmonary vein isolation; XL: unfixed number of lines based on the left atrial substrate). The BCXL-AF study (clinical trial no. ChiCTR2200067081) was designed as a prospective, randomised, parallel-controlled, single-blinded clinical trial. Overall, 400 patients with persistent AF were randomised in a 1:1 ratio into PVI-only and BCXL-individualised ablation groups. Patients randomised to the individualised ablation group will be further categorised into risk strata according to their clinical condition using the actual ablation method determined by the strata. Seven postoperative visits were conducted from discharge to 24 months of age. The primary observation endpoint will be the incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (including AF, atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia with a duration of ≥30 s) without using antiarrhythmic drugs after a blank period of 3 months following a single ablation procedure. The BCXL-AF study will assess an optimal approach for persistent AF RF ablation and evaluate the effectiveness of individualised RF ablation strategies in reducing the recurrence rate of AF.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was reviewed, and ethical approval was obtained from the Army Medical University Human Ethics Committee (approval number: 2022-484-01). All the participants provided written informed consent. This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. The results of this study will be disseminated through manuscript publication and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200067081.