Long term outcome of Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for the management of childhood spasticity-functional improvement and complications

Looking beyond Body Structure and Function: ICF Foci and Who Is Being Assessed in Research about Adolescents and Young Adults with Cerebral Palsy-A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to summarize the ICF foci, looking beyond body structures and function, and to analyze who has been assessed in research about adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with CP in the phase of transition to adulthood.

METHOD

Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases were searched using terms related to cerebral palsy, adolescents/young adults, health development, participation, and independence. Studies including youth with CP (13-30 years old) published in English from 2014 to 2021 were considered. The methods of assessment reported in the included studies were used to identify the ICF foci and who was assessed.

RESULTS

In this study, 86 studies were reviewed. The main ICF foci are activity and participation (51% of the studies), personal factors (23%), ICF not covered (14%), ICF not defined (9%), with environmental factors being the least focused ICF component (3%). Most studies assessed AYAs directly (49% of studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Activity- and participation-related constructs are the leading research focus of studies, and more attention is needed concerning environmental factors. AYAs are the main source of information, and the perspectives of other key figures are also being valued. To bridge the gap between child and adult health care, a broader view of health development and approaches to explore AYA developmental issues must be taken.

Neurosurgical management of elevated tone in childhood: interventions, indications and uncertainties

Elevated tone (hypertonia) is a common problem in children with physical disabilities. Medications intended to reduce tone often have limited efficacy, with use further limited by a significant side effect profile. Consequently, there has been growing interest in the application of Neurosurgical Interventions for the Management of Posture and Tone (NIMPTs). Three main procedures are now commonly used: selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR), intrathecal baclofen (ITB) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). This review compares these interventions, along with discussion on the potential role of lesioning surgery. These interventions variably target spasticity and dystonia, acting at different points in the distributed motor network. SDR, an intervention for reducing spasticity, is most widely used in carefully selected ambulant children with cerebral palsy. ITB is more commonly used for children with more severe disability, typically non-ambulant, and can improve both dystonia and spasticity. DBS is an intervention which may improve dystonia. In children with certain forms of genetic dystonia DBS may dramatically improve dystonia. For other causes of dystonia, and in particular dystonia due to acquired brain injury, improvements following surgery are more modest and variable. These three interventions vary in terms of their side-effect profile and reversibility. There are currently populations of children for who it is unclear which intervention should be considered (SDR vs ITB, or ITB vs DBS). Concerns have been raised as to the equity of access to NIMPTs for children across the UK, and whether the number of surgeries performed each year meets the clinical need.

The medium-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy on gait compared to a matched cerebral palsy non-SDR group: A follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) has been shown to improve gait in the short-term in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Further study is needed to look at the trajectory of outcomes over the longer-term.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the medium-term effects of SDR on gait compared to a matched CP non-SDR group?

METHODS

Participants underwent SDR at mean age 6.3 years and completed baseline, 1-year and 5-year follow-up gait analyses. Non-SDR participants were matched at baseline. Differences were assessed within and between groups. Kinematic variables were analysed using Statistical non-Parametric Mapping (SnPM). Other gait and clinical data were analysed using Friedman's one-way repeated measure analysis of variance and a Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

The initial SDR group consisted of 29 participants, reducing to 22 at 5-year follow-up. Of these, 15 (68 %) had orthopaedic surgeries either concurrent with or in the intervening period since the SDR, mean 3.3 procedures per participant. The initial non- SDR group had 18 participants, reducing to 17 at 5-year follow-up. Of these, 13 (76 %) had orthopaedic surgeries, mean 5.7 procedures. At 1-year follow-up the SDR group had significantly improved knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion, foot progression, Gait Deviation Index, and normalised step length compared to baseline, p < 0.05, and outcomes were maintained at 5-years. At 1-year follow-up the non-SDR group kinematic patterns were unchanged, but at 5-year follow-up this group demonstrated significantly improved knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion and foot progression. There were no significant kinematic differences between the SDR and the non-SDR group at medium-term follow-up.

SIGNIFICANCE

We have documented the trajectory of gait outcomes post-SDR over 3 assessments and found that short-term gait changes endured in the medium-term. However, kinematic changes were similar to a non-SDR group undergoing routine and orthopaedic care. These outcomes are important to guide surgical decision making and to manage treatment goals and expectations.

Efficacy of Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy and Intrathecal Baclofen Pump in the Management of Spasticity

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgical indications and interventions provided in the management of spasticity have evolved significantly over time. Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) and intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps have been used to improve mobility, reduce lower extremity spasticity, and increase quality of life in patients with various diagnoses.

METHODS

Studies describing ITB and SDR outcomes in adult and pediatric patients were identified from Medline and Embase databases. Only publications between January 1990 to January 2021 were included. Combinations of search terms 'Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy', 'Selective Posterior Rhizotomy', 'functional posterior rhizotomy', 'intrathecal baclofen pump', and 'spasticity' were used. Only studies in English language and those that included parameters for lower extremity outcome (i.e., spasticity, ambulation) were included. Only studies describing follow-up 12 months or greater were included. Case reports, reviews without primary data, or inaccessible publications were excluded.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety publications between January 1990 to January 2021 were identified. Of these, 62 fit inclusion and exclusion criteria for a total of 1291 adult and 2263 patients. Etiologies in adult and pediatric populations varied substantially with multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, and trauma comprising the majority of causes for spasticity in adult patients. In pediatric patients, cerebral palsy was the predominant etiology of spasticity. While outcomes after SDR and ITB varied, both are effective for long-term tone reduction. SDR appeared to have a greater effect on function compared to baseline when comparing relatively similar subgroups. The complication rates for either intervention were significant; ITB had a much greater incidence of wound and hardware adverse events, whereas SDR was associated with a not insignificant incidence of new bladder or sensory deficit.

CONCLUSION

ITB and SDR have demonstrated efficacy and utility for tone reduction in a variety of conditions. The selection of a specific intervention may have a variety of determining features including the etiology of spasticity, age of patient, as well as balancing benefit and complication profiles of each technique. Appropriate patient selection is essential for providing optimal patient outcomes.