Prognosis of congenital tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atresia on the basis of gap length

Critical Role of Pleural Wrap and Post-operative Neonatal Protocol in Long-gap Oesophageal Atresia: A Team Effort

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to bring out the results of application of pleural wrap in primary repair of tracheo - esophageal fistula (TEF) with long-gap oesophageal atresia (LGEA) and also define the role of neonatologists and paediatric intensivists in post-operative management in these patients by laying down standard neonatal management protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective descriptive observational study conducted between March 2011 and April 2019 on 23 cases of LGEA with TEF. The study was conducted at two tertiary care paediatric surgery centres in Northern part of India wherein these newborn babies were operated by two paediatric surgeons with variable experience of 8-12 years. It also describes the neonatal management protocol used in post-operative period.

RESULTS

Out of 23 patients, 15 were boys and 8 were girls, with a mean age of 32.25 weeks and a mean birth weight of 2.02 kg. The mean hospital stay was 23.5 ± 8 days. Eleven cases had gap between 3 and 3.5 cm, 8 cases between 3.5 and 4 cm and 4 cases had gap more than 4 cm. The incidence of associated anomalies was 52%. Anastomotic leak rate was 8.69%, and 3 (13.04%) patients died in the post-operative period. All the operated patients were managed postoperatively as per strict neonatal management protocol exclusively by the team of neonatologists and neonatal intensivists.

CONCLUSION

Application of pleural wrap over anastomosis following primary repair of LGEA with TEF significantly reduced the incidence of anastomotic leak in our study. Apart from the pleural wrap, the key to successful outcome also is contributed by the little prolonged, controlled ventilation and patience and perseverance in post-operative feeds. This post-operative management protocol that has been followed by us in our study is easily reproducible and can be adopted by paediatric surgeons working alongside neonatologists as a team.

Long-gap esophageal atresia: is native esophagus preservation always possible?

Introduction

Esophageal atresia (EA) is a congenital defect that causes esophageal discontinuity, often with an associated tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF) in 70%-90% of cases. When the distance between esophageal ends precludes primary anastomosis, it results in long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA), complicating the surgical management. This study retrospectively reviewed LGEA cases from the past decade, treated with the goal of preserving the native esophagus, comparing surgical techniques and outcomes with current literature.

Materials and methods

The data of patients treated for LGEA between 2013 and 2024 were collected from medical charts, focusing on patients treated with the preservation of their native esophagus.

Results

Ten patients were enrolled for this study. All of them had a gap between the esophageal ends equal to or greater than three vertebral bodies. Four patients (40%) underwent a delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) procedure, while the remaining six (60%) underwent a traction staged repair. All patients were treated with open surgery. The follow-up period extended from 3 months to 10 years.

Conclusion

Preserving the native esophagus in patients with LGEA is a challenging but feasible goal, with delayed primary anastomosis and traction techniques playing key roles. We advocate for the preservation of the native esophagus as the preferred approach for ensuring a high quality of life for patients, as it helps to avoid severe long-term complications associated with esophageal substitution.

Determining the Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture Development after Esophageal Atresia Repair: Results from the Turkish Esophageal Atresia Registry

INTRODUCTION

 Anastomotic stricture (AS) is the second most common complication after esophageal atresia (EA) repair. We aimed to evaluate the data in the Turkish Esophageal Atresia Registry to determine the risk factors for AS development after EA repair in a large national cohort of patients.

METHODS

 The data between 2015 and 2021 were evaluated. Patients were enrolled into two groups according to the occurrence of AS. Patients with AS (AS group) and without AS (non-AS group) were compared according to demographic and operative features, postoperative intubation status, and postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leaks, fistula recanalization, and the presence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to define the risk factors for the development of AS after EA repair.

RESULTS

 Among the 713 cases, 144 patients (20.19%) were enrolled into the AS group and 569 (79.81%) in the non-AS group. The multivariable logistic regression showed that, being a term baby (odds ratio [OR]: 1.706; p = 0.006), having a birth weight over 2,500 g (OR: 1.72; p = 0.006), presence of GER (OR: 5.267; p < 0.001), or having a recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF, OR: 4.363; p = 0.006) were the risk factors for the development of AS.

CONCLUSIONS

 The results of our national registry demonstrate that 20% of EA patients developed AS within their first year of life. In patients with early primary anastomosis, birth weight greater than 2,500 g and presence of GER were risk factors for developing AS. When patients with delayed anastomosis were included, in addition to the previous risk factors, being a term baby, and having recurrent TEF also became risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

 III.

Analysis of gap length as a predictor of surgical outcomes in esophageal atresia with distal fistula: a single center experience

PURPOSE

Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is still a challenge for pediatric surgery. No consensus exists as to what constitutes a long gap, and few studies have investigated the maximum gap length safely repairable by primary anastomosis. Based on surgical outcomes at a single institution, we aimed to determine the gap length in LGEA with a high risk of complications.

METHODS

The medical records of 51, consecutive patients with esophageal atresia (EA) with primary repair in the early neonatal period between 2001 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Three, major complications were found in the surgical outcomes: (1) anastomotic leakage, (2) esophageal stricture requiring dilatation, and (3) GERD requiring fundoplication. The predictive power of the postsurgical complications was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the area under the curve (AUC) and the cutoff value with a specificity of > 90% were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (31.4%) experienced a complication. The AUC of gap length was0.90 (p < 0.001), and the gap length cutoff value was ≥ 2.0 cm for predicting any complication (sensitivity: 62.5%, specificity: 91.4%).

CONCLUSION

A gap length ≥ 2.0 cm was considered as defining LGEA and was associated with an extremely high complication rate after primary repair.

Glycopyrrolate as an Adjunct in the Management of Anastomotic Leak Following Repair of Esophageal Atresia: A Clinicoradiological Perspective

Context

Anastomotic leak after primary repair of esophageal atresia (EA) with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is a well-known complication and can represent a challenging clinical scenario.

Aims

The present study aimed to evaluate the role of glycopyrrolate as an adjunct in the treatment of anastomotic leak after primary repair of EA Vogt type 3b.

Settings and Design

A retrospective study was carried out in our tertiary care teaching institute from January 2015 to December 2022.

Materials and Methods

Neonates with EA with distal TEF with primary repair who had developed anastomotic leak, managed by the author(s), were studied. The study included patients with major, minor, and radiological leaks. Glycopyrrolate was administered in the dose of 4 μg/kg 8 hourly. The outcomes of the study were either resolution or progression of the leak.

Results

There were 21 patients who were managed with glycopyrrolate in addition to the classical treatment of the anastomotic leak following repair of EA with distal TEF. The male: female ratio was 1:1.1. All the cases had anastomotic leaks with either clinically detectable in the chest tube (15) or radiological leak (6). The leaks were detected early in patients with major leak (mean = 3.2 ± 0.84 days) compared to minor leak (mean =4.9 ± 1.29 days). Radiological leaks were detected in all the neonates on postoperative day 7. In five patients with major leak, there was a negligible reduction in the amount of chest tube output, and were subjected to diversion procedures. There were a total of three deaths out of five in this group. In 10 patients with minor leak, there was complete resolution of anastomotic leak in eight patients (80%); there was one patient each with mortality and diversion procedure. The patients with a radiological leak (6) did not show any deterioration, and they were fed 1-5 days after the esophagogram.

Conclusions

Glycopyrrolate may be an advantageous postoperative adjunct in the management of minor and radiological leak after tracheoesophageal repair.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Evaluation of Anatomy and Outcome Prediction in Infants with Esophageal Atresia

INTRODUCTION

There is currently no validated diagnostic modality to characterize the anatomy and predict outcomes of tracheal esophageal defects, such as esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheal esophageal fistulas (TEFs). We hypothesized that ultra-short echo-time MRI would provide enhanced anatomic information allowing for evaluation of specific EA/TEF anatomy and identification of risk factors that predict outcome in infants with EA/TEF.

METHODS

In this observational study, 11 infants had pre-repair ultra-short echo-time MRI of the chest completed. Esophageal size was measured at the widest point distal to the epiglottis and proximal to the carina. Angle of tracheal deviation was measured by identifying the initial point of deviation and the farthest lateral point proximal to the carina.

RESULTS

Infants without a proximal TEF had a larger proximal esophageal diameter (13.5 ± 5.1 mm vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.07) when compared to infants with a proximal TEF. The angle of tracheal deviation in infants without a proximal TEF was larger than infants with a proximal TEF (16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.2 ± 5.4°, p = 0.09) and controls (16.1 ± 6.1° vs. 8.0 ± 3.1°, p = 0.005). An increase in the angle of tracheal deviation was positively correlated with duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation (Pearson r = 0.83, p < 0.002) and total duration of post-operative respiratory support (Pearson r = 0.80, p = 0.004).

DISCUSSION

These results demonstrate that infants without a proximal TEF have a larger proximal esophagus and a greater angle of tracheal deviation which is directly correlated with the need for longer post-operative respiratory support. Additionally, these results demonstrate that MRI is a useful tool to assess the anatomy of EA/TEF.

Pediatric esophageal stenoses: Challenges and new surgical device promoting tension-free esophageal anastomosis

Esophageal stenoses of childhood have a broad spectrum of underlying causes. Their treatment is usually minimally invasive by endoscopic means, but sometimes surgery is necessary in refractory cases. Techniques employed in the surgical treatment of esophageal strictures include resection of the stenotic esophageal segment or esophageal substitution procedures. Esophageal anastomosis has always been a challenge in pediatric surgery. Anastomosis complications are linked to anatomical, biological and technical aspects. Mechanical tension between esophageal ends is an important cause of complications including anastomotic leaks or dehiscence. Eleven cases of esophageal stenoses, surgically treated in the Pediatric Surgery Department of Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children 'Marie S. Curie' by a single team in 5 years, were included in the present study. The results showed that, the main causes of esophageal stenosis were represented by corrosive esophageal injury in five cases, complications of esophageal atresia repair in three cases, congenital esophageal stenosis in two cases and chemotherapy-induced esophageal necrosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment in one case. The authors also designed and presented a device facilitating esophageal anastomosis under tension. Its principle involved temporary absorption of tension at secure points of the two esophageal pouches and reallocating it in equal amounts following anastomosis while decreasing any stretch-related tissue trauma. In conclusion, this auxiliary tool is beneficial for esophageal anastomosis; however, the standard steps of the esophageal anastomosis procedure should still be considered when necessary.

Congenital Esophageal Atresia Long-Term Follow-Up-The Pediatric Surgeon's Duty to Focus on Quality of Life

Esophageal atresia (EA) is the most common congenital esophageal malformation. An improvement in survival led to a focus on functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL). We analyzed the long-term outcomes and QoL of patients submitted to surgery for EA. Perinatal characteristics, surgical procedures, gastrointestinal and respiratory current symptoms and QoL were investigated. Thirty-nine patients were included. Long Gap patients had a higher rate of prematurity and low birth weight. The prevalent surgical procedure was primary esophageal anastomosis, followed by gastric pull-up. Twenty-four patients had post-operative stenosis, while gastroesophageal reflux (GER) required fundoplication in eleven cases. Auxological parameters were lower in Long Gap patients. The lowest scores of QoL were in the Long Gap group, especially in younger patients, which was the group with the highest number of symptoms. In the long term, the QoL appeared to be more dependent on the type of esophageal atresia rather than on associated malformations. Surgical management of GER was indicated in all patients with Long Gap EA, supposedly due to the prevalence of gastric pull-up for this type of EA. The assessment of QoL is part of surgeon’s management and needs to be performed in each phase of a child’s development.

ERNICA Consensus Conference on the Management of Patients with Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia: Perioperative, Surgical, and Long-Term Management

INTRODUCTION

 Evidence supporting best practice for long-gap esophageal atresia is limited. The European Reference Network for Rare Inherited Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) organized a consensus conference on the management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia based on expert opinion referring to the latest literature aiming to provide clear and uniform statements in this respect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Twenty-four ERNICA representatives from nine European countries participated. The conference was prepared by item generation, item prioritization by online survey, formulation of a final list containing items on perioperative, surgical, and long-term management, and literature review. The 2-day conference was held in Berlin in November 2019. Anonymous voting was conducted via an internet-based system using a 1 to 9 scale. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of those voting scoring 6 to 9.

RESULTS

 Ninety-seven items were generated. Complete consensus (100%) was achieved on 56 items (58%), e.g., avoidance of a cervical esophagostomy, promotion of sham feeding, details of delayed anastomosis, thoracoscopic pouch mobilization and placement of traction sutures as novel technique, replacement techniques, and follow-up. Consensus ≥75% was achieved on 90 items (93%), e.g., definition of long gap, routine pyloroplasty in gastric transposition, and avoidance of preoperative bougienage to enable delayed anastomosis. Nineteen items (20%), e.g., methods of gap measurement were discussed controversially (range 1-9).

CONCLUSION

 This is the first consensus conference on the perioperative, surgical, and long-term management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia. Substantial statements regarding esophageal reconstruction or replacement and follow-up were formulated which may contribute to improve patient care.

Risk factors for digestive morbidities after esophageal atresia repair

Esophageal atresia with/without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) is a congenital digestive tract anomaly that represents a major therapeutic challenge. Postoperative digestive morbidities such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal stricture are common. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of and potential risk factors for digestive morbidities after EA/TEF repair. We retrospectively reviewed all EA/TEF patients who underwent repair at a single institution between January 1999 and December 2018, excluding patients who died prior to discharge. Patient demographics, perioperative management, and postoperative GERD and esophageal stricture rates were collected. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to examine risk factors associated with postoperative GERD and esophageal stricture. The study enrolled 58 infants (58.6% male, 17.2% with type A EA/TEF, 62.1% with associated anomalies). Postoperative GERD occurred in 67.2% of patients and was the most common digestive morbidity. Esophageal stricture occurred in 37.9% of patients after EA/TEF repair. Multivariate analysis showed that long-gap EA/TEF and postoperative GERD were independent risk factors for esophageal stricture after repair surgery.Conclusion: The incidence of postoperative GERD and esophageal stricture was 67.2% and 37.9%, respectively. The risk factors for postoperative esophageal stricture were long-gap EA/TEF and postoperative GERD. What is Known: • EA/TEF is a congenital digestive tract anomaly with a high postoperative survival rate but can be complicated by many long-term morbidities. What is New: • Long-gap EA/TEF and postoperative GERD are risk factors of anastomotic stricture after repair. • Surgeons and pediatricians should be highly experienced in managing anastomotic tension and the GERD.

Risk factors and management for anastomotic stricture after surgical reconstruction of esophageal atresia

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Anastomotic stricture (AS) is a major morbidity of patients with esophageal atresia (EA) after surgical reconstruction. Our study determined the risk factors of AS after EA reconstruction. The therapeutic efficacy and complications of esophageal dilatation for children with AS were also evaluated.

METHODS

Forty children treated for EA between January 2008 and December 2018 were included in this retrospective analysis. Esophageal dilatation was performed when AS was diagnosed. The therapeutic effect of esophageal dilatation was determined based on nutritional status, as assessed by the weight-for-age z-score.

RESULTS

Sixteen EA patients developed AS. A gap >1.5 cm between the esophageal pouches (P = 0.02) in patients with EA and type A EA was a risk factor for developing AS. A mean of 7.7 sessions of esophageal dilatation were performed per patient, and no complications occurred. The nutritional status of EA children with AS after dilatation was not inferior to that of the children without AS at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A gap >1.5 cm between the esophageal pouches and type A EA are risk factors for AS after esophageal reconstruction. Esophageal dilatation is both safe and effective for managing strictures and improves nutritional status in EA children with AS.

Conservative Management of Major Anastomotic Leaks Occurring after Primary Repair in Esophageal Atresia with Fistula: Role of Extrapleural Approach

Aims:

We are reporting single-institution's experience regarding the role of conservative management in 38 cases of minor and major anastomotic leaks [AL] occurring after primary surgery of esophageal atresia [EA] with tracheo-esophageal fistula [TEF] during last 17 years between 2000 and 2017. In this retrospective review, we are sharing our experience and protocol of management of AL with more emphasis to evaluate: (a) role of conservative treatment in major AL (b) role of extra-pleural approach in enhancing the success rate in conservative treatment in major AL (c) to define the criteria for major & minor leaks and (d) to evaluate the role of ventilation in primary EA surgery to control AL.

Methods:

All these cases were operated through extra-pleural approach and out of total 203 cases, 38[18.7%] developed anastomotic leaks. In 29 of the 38 cases [14.3%], leak was minor and in 9 cases [4.4%] the leak was a major one. All these cases of leaks were managed conservatively.

Results:

All cases of major and minor leaks showed spontaneous healing except one case of minor leak that died before healing due to major cardiac anomaly. For minor leaks, average healing time was 9.5 days while for major leaks it was 17.4 days. Overall mortality was 14.8% and there was no mortality directly attributable to major or minor leak. During follow up, the incidence of stricture was 40% in cases having anastomotic leaks, while in cases without a leak, the incidence of stricture was 23.3%. These all cases of stricture responded to regular dilatations.

Conclusion:

We believe in cases of major AL, where primary repair is done by EP approach, a conservative treatment should be the treatment of choice. With this conservative approach of management of major AL, we not only save the native esophagus, the best conduit, but there is also less morbidity and mortality.

First-Year follow-up of Newborns Operated for Esophageal Atresia in a Developing Country: Just Operating is not Enough!

Purpose:

To identify complications, their incidence and risk factors for their occurrence in patients of esophageal atresia (EA) in the 1^st year after discharge following surgery.

Materials and Methods:

Cases of EA discharged after surgical intervention in the period of July 2011–July 2013 were considered a cohort. All data regarding demographics, investigations, surgical procedure, outcome, and follow-up were recorded.

Results:

Seventy-six such patients were discharged in the study period, six of whom were lost to follow-up, and hence, seventy patients were included in the study. Of these 70, 48 (69%) had esophageal continuity restored (46 EA + tracheoesophageal fistula [TEF]; 2 pure EA), while 22 (31%) had been diverted (3 pure EA; 8 EA + TEF following major leak; 11 long gap EA + TEF). Risk of developing any complication (except death) was 48/70 (68%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 57.4–79.7). Twenty-six of 48 patients with esophageal continuity restored, demonstrated narrowing on contrast study (54%; 95% CI = 39.5–68.7) but only 18 of these 48 (37.5%) had dysphagia. Thirty-one of seventy had an episode of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) (44.2%; 95% CI = 32.3%–56.2%). Poor weight gain was observed in 27/70 (37%), and this was significantly common in diverted patients (63% vs. 25%; P = 0.009). Twenty-one of total 70 (30%) patients died within the 1^st year following discharge.

Conclusions:

Sixty-eight percent of cases developed some complication, while 30% succumbed within the 1^st year of life following discharge. The common complications were stricture, LRTI, and poor weight gain. All of these were common in diverted patients.

Prediction of Gap Length by Plain Radiograph of Chest with Nasogastric Tube in the Upper Esophagus in Patients with Esophageal Atresia and Distal Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Aim

This study was aimed at prediction of the gap length between the two esophageal ends in cases of esophageal atresia and distal tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF) by preoperative radiography with a nasogastric tube in the upper esophagus and its correlation with intraoperatively measured gap length.

Materials and Methods

All consecutive cases of EA-TEF were prospectively included in this study. Plain radiographs were taken with an 8 Fr nasogastric tube inserted in the upper esophageal pouch till its arrest. The patients were grouped into T1-T2; T2-T3; T3-T4; and T4 groups depending on the thoracic vertebral level of arrest of the NG tube on the radiograph. Intraoperative gap between the two esophageal ends was measured with Vernier caliper, and the patients were grouped into A, B, and C groups based on gap length (gap length >2.1 cm; >1-≤2 cm; and ≤1 cm). The operative gap groups were compared with the radiography groups.

Results

A total number of 118 cases were included over a period of 3 years. The arrest of nasogastric tube at T1-T2 and T2-T3 vertebral level corresponded to gap length Group A in 39/41 (95.12%) * patients. In gap length Group B, the arrest of tube at T2-T3 and T3-T4 vertebral level was seen in 44/44 (100%)* patients, in gap length Group C, the arrest of tube was noted at T3-T4 and T4 vertebral level in 31/33 (93.93%)* patients (*P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Prediction of gap length by vertebral level of arrest of the nasogastric tube in the upper pouch in a preoperative chest X-ray correlated well with intra operatively measured gap length in cases of EA-TEF.

Management of long gap esophageal atresia: A systematic review and evidence-based guidelines from the APSA Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee

BACKGROUND

Treatment of the neonate with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is one of the most challenging scenarios facing pediatric surgeons today. Contributing to this challenge is the variability in case definition, multiple approaches to management, and heterogeneity of the reported outcomes. This necessitates a clear summary of existing evidence and delineation of treatment controversies.

METHODS

The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee drafted four consensus-based questions regarding LGEA. These questions concerned the definition and determination of LGEA, the optimal method of surgical management, expected long-term outcomes, and novel therapeutic techniques. A comprehensive search strategy was crafted and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to identify, review and report salient articles.

RESULTS

More than 3000 publications were reviewed, with 178 influencing final recommendations. In total, 18 recommendations are provided, primarily based on level 4-5 evidence. These recommendations provide detailed descriptions of the definition of LGEA, treatment techniques, outcomes and future directions of research.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supporting best practices for LGEA is currently low quality. This review provides best recommendations based on a critical evaluation of the available literature. Based on the lack of strong evidence, prospective and comparative research is clearly needed.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study, prognosis study and study of diagnostic test.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-V.

Risk factors for refractory anastomotic strictures after oesophageal atresia repair: a multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of refractory anastomotic strictures after oesophageal atresia (OA) repair and to identify risk factors associated with refractory strictures.

METHODS

Retrospective national multicentre study in patients with OA born between 1999 and 2013. Exclusion criteria were isolated fistula, inability to obtain oesophageal continuity, death prior to discharge and follow-up <6 months. A refractory oesophageal stricture was defined as an anastomotic stricture requiring ≥5 dilations at maximally 4-week intervals. Risk factors for development of refractory anastomotic strictures after OA repair were identified with multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

We included 454 children (61% male, 7% isolated OA (Gross type A)). End-to-end anastomosis was performed in 436 (96%) children. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 13%. Fifty-eight per cent of children with an end-to-end anastomosis developed an anastomotic stricture, requiring a median of 3 (range 1-34) dilations. Refractory strictures were found in 32/436 (7%) children and required a median of 10 (range 5-34) dilations. Isolated OA (OR 5.7; p=0.012), anastomotic leakage (OR 5.0; p=0.001) and the need for oesophageal dilation ≤28 days after anastomosis (OR 15.9; p<0.001) were risk factors for development of a refractory stricture.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of refractory strictures of the end-to-end anastomosis in children treated for OA was 7%. Risk factors were isolated OA, anastomotic leakage and the need for oesophageal dilation less than 1 month after OA repair.

Location of TEF at the carina as an indicator of long-gap C-type esophageal atresia

We analyzed retrospectively the outcomes in long gap Gross type C esophageal atresia. We hypothesized that outcomes in type C (long gap) atresia differ from type C (normal gap) and be similar with outcomes in Gross type A and B esophageal atresia. Location of the distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) at the carina was chosen as the hallmark of type C atresia (long gap). We compared the type of esophageal repair, major reoperations for anastomotic complications and gastroesophageal reflux, and long-term mucosal changes between type C (normal gap), type C (long gap), and type A/B. We analyzed the hospital charts of 247 successive patients from 1984 to 2014 who either underwent repair of esophageal atresia in our institution (n = 232) or were referred from elsewhere because of anastomotic complications (n = 15). Among the 232 patients of our institution, 181 had type C and 21 type A or B esophageal atresia. Twenty-two (12%) of type C patients had TEF at the carina and were considered as type C (long gap). The referred patients included a disproportionately high number (42%) of patients with type C (long gap). We attempted primary anastomosis in 98% of patients with type C (normal gap), in 95% with type C (long gap), and 53% with type A/B underwent delayed primary anastomosis. Leakage after primary anastomosis occurred in 40% of patients with type A/B and in 23% with type C (long gap) compared with 6% in patients with type C (normal gap) (P < 0.05). Recalcitrant anastomotic stricture that eventually required esophageal resection occurred in 30% of patients with type A/B and in 18% with type C (long gap) compared with 3% in patients with type C (normal gap) (P < 0.05). The overall rate of major reoperations for anastomotic complications after primary anastomosis, type A/B (36%), type C (long gap) (27%), and antireflux surgery, type A/B (100%) and type C (long gap) (61%) were higher than in type C (normal gap), (9% and 24%), (P < 0.05 in both). Ten (47%) patients with type A/B esophageal atresia (primary anastomosis not possible n = 10), three (14%) with type C (long gap) (primary anastomosis not possible n = 1, significant loss of esophageal length after complications n = 2) and two (1%) with type C (normal gap) (significant loss of esophageal length after complications n = 2) underwent esophageal reconstruction. Endoscopic follow-up, median length 7.0 (IQR: 3.0-14) years, disclosed gastric metaplasia in 31% and 33% of patients with type A/B and type C (long gap) compared with 11% in type C (normal gap) (P < 0.05). Intestinal metaplasia was found in one patient type C (normal gap) (0.7%) and one with type C (long gap) (5.6%), (P = 0.21), only. The outcomes of type C (long gap) esophageal atresia are associated with more frequent complications, gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal mucosal changes than outcomes in type C (normal gap). Outcomes in type C (long gap) esophageal atresia resemble those in type A/B. The percentage of patients who remain with their native esophagus is, however, higher in type C (long gap) atresia (86%) than in type A/B (53%).

Respiratory Morbidity in Children with Repaired Congenital Esophageal Atresia with or without Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Congenital esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (CEA ± TEF) is a relatively common malformation that occurs in 1 of 2500–4500 live births. Despite the refinement of surgical techniques, a considerable proportion of children experience short- and long-term respiratory complications, which can significantly affect their health through adulthood. This review focuses on the underlying mechanisms and clinical presentation of respiratory morbidity in children with repaired CEA ± TEF. The reasons for the short-term pulmonary impairments are multifactorial and related to the surgical complications, such as anastomotic leaks, stenosis, and recurrence of fistula. Long-term respiratory morbidity is grouped into four categories according to the body section or function mainly involved: upper respiratory tract, lower respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, and aspiration and dysphagia. The reasons for the persistence of respiratory morbidity to adulthood are not univocal. The malformation itself, the acquired damage after the surgical repair, various co-morbidities, and the recurrence of lower respiratory tract infections at an early age can contribute to pulmonary impairment. Nevertheless, other conditions, including smoking habits and, in particular, atopy can play a role in the recurrence of infections. In conclusion, our manuscript shows that most children born with CEA ± TEF survive into adulthood, but many comorbidities, mainly esophageal and respiratory issues, may persist. The pulmonary impairment involves many underlying mechanisms, which begin in the first years of life. Therefore, early detection and management of pulmonary morbidity may be important to prevent impairment in pulmonary function and serious long-term complications. To obtain a successful outcome, it is fundamental to ensure a standardized follow-up that must continue until adulthood.

Esophageal Atresia with Tracheo-Esophageal Fistula Presenting Beyond 7 Days

Aim: To describe our experience of neonates with esophageal atresia with tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA with TEF) who presented after a week.

Design: Retrospective study of the patients of EA with TEF who presented after a week.

Study Setting: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Government Medical College Nagpur.

Study Duration: Eight years.

Materials and Methods: Demographic information, hematological, biochemical and radiological data were obtained from the patients' medical records. The gap between two ends of the esophagus, nature of upper pouch and lower esophagus were noted intra-operatively. Outcome in terms of mortality and surgical complications were noted. In operated group, babies who survived were compared with non-survivors with respect to various preoperative variables.

Results: Of 52 patients, 27 babies expired during initial stabilisation period before surgery. The causes of mortality were severe pneumonitis and septicemia. One baby had associated cyanotic heart disease. Twenty-five patients with mean age of 8.28±1.21 days underwent surgery. Nearly two-third of them were male. All of them were born at full-term with mean birth weight of 2.47±0. 12 kg. More than 80% were previously hospitalised and nearly 70% babies were given feeds before present hospitalization. Mean Downe’s score for respiratory distress was 5.8±1.49. All patients were positive for septic profile. Associated congenital anomalies were present in ten patients. Intra-operatively, two ends of esophagus were either approximating or have short gap in 24 patients. All patients had well developed, thick and muscular upper oesophageal pouch. Lower esophagus at fistula was thin but dilated in 18 patients while thin and narrowed in 7 patients. However, esophageal anastomosis was possible with ease without any tension in all except one patient. There were 15 deaths in our study (13 due to pneumonitis and 2 during follow up due to aspiration). Three survivors required anti-reflux surgery. Comparison of preoperative variables of survivors and non-survivors showed a significant difference with respect to the variables like feedings, abdominal girth, immature band cells to neutrophil ratio and nature of pharyngeal or endotracheal aspirate.

Conclusions: Late presentations in EA with TEF are associated with high mortality but less anastomotic complications after surgery. Preoperative factors like feedings, abdominal distension, immature band cells to neutrophil ratio and bilious pharyngeal or endotracheal aspirate are associated with high mortality.

A scoring system to predict mortality in infants with esophageal atresia: A case-control study

Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare anomaly that mandates surgical intervention. Patients with EA often have complicated medical courses due to both esophageal anomalies and related comorbidities. Although several prognostic classification systems have been developed to decrease the mortality rate in EA, most systems focus only on the influence of the major anomaly, and external risk factors that could be influenced by the neonatal caregivers to a certain extent are not included. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors for in-hospital mortality in neonates with EA and develop a scoring model to predict mortality.In total, 198 infants with EA who were treated with surgical intervention at the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between March 2004 and June 2016 were included. The demographic information, clinical manifestations, laboratory testing, and outcomes during hospitalization were analyzed retrospectively. A predictive scoring model was developed according to the regression coefficients of the risk factors.The mortality rate was 18.1% (36/198). In the univariate analysis, higher incidences of prematurity, low birth weight, long gap, anastomotic leak, respiratory failure, postoperative sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, pneumothorax, and septic shock were found in the nonsurvivor group than in the survivor group (P < .05). In the logistic regression analysis, anastomotic leak (OR: 10.75, 95% CI: 3.113-37.128), respiratory failure (OR: 4.104, 95% CI: 2.292-7.355), postoperative sepsis (OR: 3.564, 95% CI: 1.516-8.375), and low birth weight (OR: 8.379, 95% CI: 3.357-20.917) were associated with a high mortality rate. A scoring model for predicting death was developed with a sensitivity of 0.861, a specificity of 0.827, a positive predictive value of 0.524, and a negative predictive value of 0.963 at a cutoff of 2 points. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the score was 0.905 (95% CI, 0.863-0.948, P = .000) for death from EA. The mortality rate increased rapidly as the scores increased, and all patients with scores ≥5 died.Anastomotic leak, respiratory failure, postoperative sepsis, and low birth weight are independent risk factors for mortality in EA. Infants with a predictive score of 5 had a high risk of death.

Anastomotic Strictures after Esophageal Atresia Repair: Incidence, Investigations, and Management, Including Treatment of Refractory and Recurrent Strictures

Improved surgical techniques, as well as preoperative and postoperative care, have dramatically changed survival of children with esophageal atresia (EA) over the last decades. Nowadays, we are increasingly seeing EA patients experiencing significant short- and long-term gastrointestinal morbidities. Anastomotic stricture (AS) is the most common complication following operative repair. An esophageal stricture is defined as an intrinsic luminal narrowing in a clinically symptomatic patient, but no symptoms are sensitive or specific enough to diagnose an AS. This review aims to provide a comprehensive view of AS in EA children. Given the lack of evidence-based data, we critically analyzed significant studies on children and adults, including comments on benign strictures with other etiologies. Despite there is no consensus about the goal of the luminal diameter based on the patient's age, esophageal contrast study, and/or endoscopy are recommended to assess the degree of the narrowing. A high variability in incidence of ASs is reported in literature, depending on different definitions of AS and on a great number of pre-, intra-, and postoperative risk factor influencing the anastomosis outcome. The presence of a long gap between the two esophageal ends, with consequent anastomotic tension, is determinant for stricture formation and its response to treatment. The cornerstone of treatment is endoscopic dilation, whose primary aims are to achieve symptom relief, allow age-appropriate capacity for oral feeding, and reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. No clear advantage of either balloon or bougie dilator has been demonstrated; therefore, the choice is based on operator experience and comfort with the equipment. Retrospective evidences suggest that selective dilatations (performed only in symptomatic patients) results in significantly less number of dilatation sessions than routine dilations (performed to prevent symptoms) with equal long-term outcomes. The response to dilation treatment is variable, and some patients may experience recurrent and refractory ASs. Adjunctive treatments have been used, including local injection of steroids, topical application of mitomycin C, and esophageal stenting, but long-term studies are needed to prove their efficacy and safety. Stricture resection or esophageal replacement with an interposition graft remains options for AS refractory to conservative treatments.

Diagnosis and treatment of congenital esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula

Esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) is a congenital life-threatening malformation which requires surgical repair, but it is still a challenge for patients and surgeons because of EA itself, possible combined severe deformities, and surgical risk. Thanks to the development and improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic methods and techniques, especially the progress achieved in preoperative EA diagnosis, successful surgery for long-gap EA/TEF, and the application of thoracoscopic technology, the survival rate after surgery has reached 95%. However, the possible postoperative complications and its managements should not be ignored.

ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN Guidelines for the Evaluation and Treatment of Gastrointestinal and Nutritional Complications in Children With Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal Fistula

BACKGROUND

Esophageal atresia (EA) is one of the most common congenital digestive anomalies. With improvements in surgical techniques and intensive care treatments, the focus of care of these patients has shifted from mortality to morbidity and quality-of-life issues. These children face gastrointestinal (GI) problems not only in early childhood but also through adolescence and adulthood. There is, however, currently a lack of a systematic approach to the care of these patients. The GI working group of International Network on Esophageal Atresia comprises members from ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN and was charged with the task of developing uniform evidence-based guidelines for the management of GI complications in children with EA.

METHODS

Thirty-six clinical questions addressing the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the common GI complications in patients with EA were formulated. Questions on the diagnosis, and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux, management of "cyanotic spells," etiology, investigation and management of dysphagia, feeding difficulties, anastomotic strictures, congenital esophageal stenosis in EA patients were addressed. The importance of excluding eosinophilic esophagitis and associated GI anomalies in symptomatic patients with EA is discussed as is the quality of life of these patients and the importance of a systematic transition of care to adulthood. A systematic literature search was performed from inception to March 2014 using Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, and PsychInfo databases. The approach of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was applied to evaluate outcomes. During 2 consensus meetings, all recommendations were discussed and finalized. The group members voted on each recommendation, using the nominal voting technique. Expert opinion was used where no randomized controlled trials were available to support the recommendation.

Evaluation of risk factors affecting anastomotic leakage after repair of esophageal atresia

Background:

Anastomotic leak are reported among neonates who underwent esophageal atresia.

Aim:

To find risk factors of anastomotic leakage in patients underwent esophageal repair.

Methods:

All cases with esophageal atresia were included. In this case control study, patients were classified in two groups according to presence or absence of anastomotic leaks. Duration of study was 10 years.

Results:

Sixty-one cases were included. Mean±SD age at time of surgery in patients with leakage and without leakage was 9.50±7.25 and 8.83±6.93 respectively (p=.670). Blood transfusion and two layer anastomosis had significant correlation with anastomotic leakage.

Conclusion:

Blood transfusion and double layer anastomosis are associated with higher rate of anastomotic leakage.

Determinants of gap length in esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula and the impact of gap length on outcome

Aim:

This study was aimed at identifying factors which may affect the gap length in cases of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF) and whether gap length plays any role in determining the outcome.

Materials and Methods:

All consecutive cases of EA-TEF were included and different patient parameters were recorded. Plain radiographs with a nasogastric tube in the upper esophagus were taken. Patients were grouped into T1-T2; T2-T3; T3-T4; and T4 depending on the thoracic vertebral level of the arrest of the tube. During surgery, the gap length between the pouches was measured using a Vernier caliper and the patients were grouped into A, B, and C (gap length >2.1 cm; >1-≤2 cm and ≤1 cm). The operative gap groups were compared with the radiography groups and the other recorded parameters.

Results:

Total numbers of cases were 69. Birth weight was found to be significantly lower in Group A (mean = 2.14 kg) as compared to Group B (mean = 2.38 kg) and Group C patients (mean = 2.49 kg) (P = 0.016). The radiographic groups compared favorably with the intraoperative gap length groups (P < 0.001). The need for postoperative ventilation (70.83% in Group A vs. 36.84% in Group C, P = 0.032) and mortality (62.5%, 26.9% and 15.8% in Group A, B, and C, respectively, P = 0.003) co-related significantly with the gap length.

Conclusion:

Birth weight had a direct reciprocal relationship with the gap length. Radiographic assessment correlated with intraoperative gap length. Higher gap length was associated with increased need for postoperative ventilation and poor outcome.

Does continuous positive airway pressure for extubation in congenital tracheoesophageal fistula increase the risk of anastomotic leak? A retrospective cohort study

AIM

Immediate post-operative care of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) and oesophageal atresia (EA) requires mechanical ventilation. Early extubation is preferred, but subsequent respiratory distress may warrant re-intubation. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a well-established modality to prevent extubation failures in preterm infants. However, it is not favoured in TEF/EA, because of the theoretical risk of oesophageal anastomotic leak (AL). The aim of this study was to find out if post-extubation CPAP is associated with increased risk of AL.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study (2007-2014).

RESULTS

Fifty-one infants underwent primary repair in the newborn period. Median age at surgery was 24 h (interquartile range: 12, 24). In the post-extubation period, 10 received CPAP, whereas 41 did not. The median post-operative day at the commencement of CPAP was 2.5 days (interquartile range: 1, 6 days). Zero out of 10 in the CPAP group and 4/41 in the 'no CPAP' group developed AL on routine post-operative contrast studies (P = 0.57). Zero out of 10 in the CPAP group and 1/41 in the 'no CPAP group' developed recurrence of TEF necessitating re-surgery (P = 1.00). The neonate with recurrent fistula also had coarctation of aorta and needed protracted hospitalisation of 6 months, mainly because of the recurrence of TEF.

CONCLUSION

The use of CPAP in the immediate post-extubation period after corrective surgery for TEF/EA appears to be safe and may not be associated with increased risk of AL or recurrence of the fistula. Information from other centres, surveys and large databases is needed to define the benefits and risks of use of CPAP in these infants.

A comparison of surgical outcomes between in-hours and after-hours tracheoesophageal fistula repairs

BACKGROUND

Emerging literature has found increased complications for some patients undergoing nonemergent surgeries performed after-hours. For infants born with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF), no literature exists addressing the impact of the timing of surgery on outcomes.

METHODS

With IRB approval, EA/TEF repairs (2005-2010) performed at a tertiary children's hospital were reviewed retrospectively. All patients had an esophageal anastomosis. After-hours surgeries were defined as 1530-0800 Monday to Friday, weekends/holidays. Demographics, EA/TEF type, operative details, anastomotic tension, and complications were compared. Outcomes measured included intraoperative desaturations, esophageal complications (leak, stricture, recurrence), pneumothorax, and mortality.

RESULTS

There were 28 patients, of which 21 underwent the procedure in-hours and 7 after-hours. Patient age, gestational age, weight, EA/TEF type, cardiac anomalies, and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were not different between the groups. Operative time, intraoperative desaturations, anastomotic tension, blood loss, total ventilation days, or length of hospitalization were not significantly different. There was a significant increase in esophageal leaks in the after-hours group (n=3) vs. the in-hours (n=0) group (p=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, infants with an EA/TEF repaired after-hours had a significant increase in anastomotic leaks. The observed increase in leaks requires further evaluation to ensure more optimal outcomes for this fragile group of patients.

Measured gap length and outcomes in oesophageal atresia

AIMS

Oesophageal atresia (OA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TOF) is the most common congenital anomaly of the oesophagus. There is limited literature suggesting a linear relationship between increasing gap length and the incidence of all major complications. We sought to assess whether measured gap length at the time of surgery was related to outcomes in our patients.

METHODS

All patients with a diagnosis of OA +/- TOF who underwent repair under a single surgeon between 1983 and 2012 were included. The length between the oesophageal pouches was measured at the time of surgery. Patients were then divided into three groups; short ≤1cm, intermediate >1-≤2cm and long >2-≤5cm. Outcome measures were anastomotic leak, strictures requiring dilatation, gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and need for fundoplication.

RESULTS

122 patients were included in the study. The outcomes for patients with short (n=53), intermediate (n=51) and long gaps (n=18) were as follows: anastomotic leak - 1.9%, 2%, 5.5% (P=0.66), strictures requiring dilatation - 32%, 33%, 50% (P=0.67), GORD - 51%, 59%, 72% (P=0.58) and need for fundoplication - 11%, 20%, 44% (*P=0.02). There were no deaths related to the repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Measured gap length at the time of surgery did not have a linear relationship with leak or stricture rate. Our experience suggests that when primary repair is possible absolute gap length is irrelevant to the development of post-operative complications. There is however a significant increase in the need for fundoplication in those with a long gap.

Morbidity and mortality in patients with esophageal atresia

BACKGROUND

This study reports national estimates of population characteristics and outcomes for patients with esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) and evaluates the relationships between hospital volume and outcomes.

METHODS

Patients admitted within 30 days of life who had International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification diagnosis and procedure codes relevant to EA/TEF during 1999-2012 were identified with the Pediatric Health Information System database. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes, including predictors of in-hospital mortality, were examined up to 2 years after EA/TEF repair.

RESULTS

We identified 3,479 patients with EA/TEF treated at 43 children's hospitals; 37% were premature and 83.5% had ≥1 additional congenital anomaly, with cardiac anomalies (69.6%) being the most prevalent. Within 2 years of discharge, 54.7% were readmitted, 5.2% had a repeat TEF ligation, 11.4% had a repeat operation for their esophageal reconstruction, and 11.7% underwent fundoplication. In-hospital mortality was 5.4%. Independent predictors of mortality included lower birth weight, congenital heart disease, other congenital anomalies, and preoperative mechanical ventilation. There was no relationship between hospital volume and mortality or repeat TEF ligation.

CONCLUSION

This study describes population characteristics and outcomes, including predictors of in-hospital mortality, in EA/TEF patients treated at children's hospitals across the United States. Across these hospitals, rates of mortality or repeat TEF ligation were not dependent on hospital volume.

Retrospective cohort study of long-gap oesophageal atresia

AIM

Long-gap oesophageal atresia (LGOA) remains a rare variant of a relatively common congenital malformation. Objectives of this study were to review the short-term results including survival, length of stay and post-operative complications for infants with LGOA managed at a single centre in addition to their growth and neurodevelopmental assessment.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the case notes of all infants admitted with oesophageal atresia to our institution from January 2001 to May 2011. Infants with LGOA were selected based on pre-defined criteria. Demographic and clinical variables and details of follow-up visits including developmental assessments were extracted from their case notes.

RESULTS

Of 101 infants with oesophageal atresia, 15 fulfilled the criteria for LGOA. Overall survival was 80%. Median length of stay was 83 days. Additional congenital anomalies were present in nine (60%). A fall in weight centile during hospitalisation or outpatient follow-up signifying growth failure was seen in a majority with 11 of 13 patients showing this phenomenon. Follow-up at our institution ranged from 6 months to 9 years. Developmental assessments (Bayley-III) commenced in August 2006 were available in four patients (age 5-13 months) and were abnormal in all, with particular delay in the gross motor domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants with LGOA spend a long time in hospital. They remain at significant risk of growth failure during hospitalisation and following discharge. There appears to be a risk of developmental delay that warrants close monitoring.

Long-gap esophageal atresia: traction-growth and anastomosis - before and beyond

Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is still a major surgical challenge. Options for esophageal reconstruction include the use of native esophagus or esophageal replacement with stomach, colon, or small intestine. Nonetheless, there is a consensus among most pediatric surgeons that the preservation of the native esophagus is associated with better postoperative outcomes. Thus, every effort should be made to conserve the native esophagus. The present study is aimed at critically reporting our experience focused on a standardized protocol based on the preoperative assessment of the gap in all cases and reviewing the present literature because no consensus is available regarding many aspects of LGEA (from definition to treatment). All newborn infants treated since 1995 for esophageal atresia (EA), regardless of type, were included in the present study. Identification of LGEA patients (gap ≥3 vertebral bodies) was performed based on preoperative esophageal gap measurement. The selected patients were grouped based on EA type (A/B vs. C/D) and whether they were referred from an outside institution or not. Postoperative outcome was compared. Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test as appropriate, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Two hundred and nineteen patients have been consecutively treated between 1995 and 2012 with the following EA subtypes: type: A 25 (11.4%); B 6 (2.7%); C 182 (83.1%); D 3 (1.4%); E 3 (1.4%). Fifty-seven patients (26%) were classified as LGEA: type A-B, 31 (54.4%); type C-D, 26 (45.6%). Twenty seven (47%) of these patients were referred after at least one failed attempt at esophageal correction: type A-B, 15 (55%); type C-D, 12 (45%). Only one patient ultimately required esophageal substitution, with an overall survival rate of 94%. A standardized perioperative protocol enhances the possibility of preserving the native esophagus in cases of LGEA. Gap measurement can be accurately defined before surgery in all patients with EA. Esophageal anastomosis (either immediate or delayed repair) is almost always feasible; esophageal substitution should only be considered after a rigorous attempt at achieving end-to-end esophageal anastomosis.

[Malformations of the esophagus: diagnosis and therapy]

Esophageal malformations are rare and can occur sporadically or as a component of various syndromes. The variations and classifications are manifold. With the available modern operation techniques most malformations can be resolved with good results. However, esophageal malformations are often combined with further malformations which limit the prognosis. The separation of the trachea and esophagus after gastrulation is not yet completely researched. The results so far indicate that the localized expression of various homeodomain transcription factors is essential for normal development of the trachea and esophagus.

Role of preoperative 3D CT reconstruction for evaluation of patients with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula

OBJECTIVE

The role of preoperative contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) of chest with three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions was evaluated in neonates with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula.

METHODS

This was a prospective study which investigated 30 cases of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with contrast-enhanced spiral CT using a low-dose CT protocol. 3D CT reconstruction images were evaluated for the type of esophageal atresia, the distance between the upper and lower esophageal pouches, origin, level and position of the fistula, and the presence or absence of any other cardiac, pulmonary or mediastinal lesions and the findings were correlated with the findings at surgery. The radiation dose for each patient was calculated using the formula-Effective dose (E) = DLP × (E/DLP)age.

RESULTS

All the 30 cases had type-C esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula as per Gross classification. The exact site of the fistula could be identified only in 26 (80 %) cases. The mean gap between the upper pouch and lower fistula was 0.95 ± 0.57 cm (range 0.2-2.8 cm) on CT scan and 1.38 ± 0.61 cm (range 0.5-3.2 cm) at surgery. On statistical analysis, the correlation was found to be significant (p < 0.0001). In addition, lung pathology (consolidation), cardiac pathology and vertebral anomaly were also detected on CT scan in some cases. The mean radiation dose for the neonates who underwent CT chest was calculated to be 1.79 mSv which is significantly high.

CONCLUSION

Though preoperative CT scan of chest has many advantages, it involves significant exposure to ionizing radiation and risk of radiation-induced cancer in the future. Additionally in 20 % of cases, the fistula could not be located on CT scan. The most common variety of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula is Gross type C (86 %) that has low to intermediate gap (97 %) and can be anastomosed primarily. Thus, CT scan can provide good anatomical delineation, but may not help in surgical decision making. Hence, performing CT in these cases would unnecessarily expose the neonates to ionizing radiation. Therefore, there is no role for CT scan in the routine preoperative assessment of EA with distal TEF.

Esophageal atresia associated with anorectal malformation: Is the outcome better after surgery in two stages in a limited resources scenario?

Aims:

To analyze whether outcome of neonates having esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA±TEF) associated with anorectal malformation (ARM) can be improved by doing surgery in 2 stages.

Materials and Methods:

A prospective study of neonates having both EA±TEF and ARM from 2004 to 2011. The patients with favorable parameters were operated in a single stage, whereas others underwent first-stage decompression surgery for ARM. Thereafter, once septicemia was under control and ventilator care available, second-stage surgery for EA±TEF was performed.

Results:

Total 70 neonates (single stage = 20, 2 stages = 30, expired after colostomy = 9, only EA±TEF repair needed = 11) were enrolled. The admission rate for this association was 1 per 290. Forty-one percent (24/70) neonates had VACTERL association and 8.6% (6/70) neonates had multiple gastrointestinal atresias. Sepsis screen was positive in 71.4% (50/70). The survival was 45% (9/20) in neonates operated in a single stage and 53.3% (16/30) when operated in 2 stages (P = 0.04). Data analysis of 50 patients revealed that the survived neonates had significantly better birth weight, better gestational age, negative sepsis screen, no cardiac diseases, no pneumonia, and 2-stage surgery (P value 0.002, 0.003, 0.02, 0.02, 0.04, and 0.04, respectively). The day of presentation and abdominal distension had no significant effect (P value 0.06 and 0.06, respectively). This was further supported by stepwise logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions:

In a limited resources scenario, the survival rate of babies with this association can be improved by treating ARM first and then for EA±TEF in second stage, once mechanical ventilator care became available and sepsis was under control.

Current knowledge on esophageal atresia

Esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is the most common congenital anomaly of the esophagus. The improvement of survival observed over the previous two decades is multifactorial and largely attributable to advances in neonatal intensive care, neonatal anesthesia, ventilatory and nutritional support, antibiotics, early surgical intervention, surgical materials and techniques. Indeed, mortality is currently limited to those cases with coexisting severe life-threatening anomalies. The diagnosis of EA is most commonly made during the first 24 h of life but may occur either antenatally or may be delayed. The primary surgical correction for EA and TEF is the best option in the absence of severe malformations. There is no ideal replacement for the esophagus and the optimal surgical treatment for patients with long-gap EA is still controversial. The primary complications during the postoperative period are leak and stenosis of the anastomosis, gastro-esophageal reflux, esophageal dysmotility, fistula recurrence, respiratory disorders and deformities of the thoracic wall. Data regarding long-term outcomes and follow-ups are limited for patients following EA/TEF repair. The determination of the risk factors for the complicated evolution following EA/TEF repair may positively impact long-term prognoses. Much remains to be studied regarding this condition. This manuscript provides a literature review of the current knowledge regarding EA.

The outcome of conservative treatment for anastomotic leakage after surgical repair of esophageal atresia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of conservative management of anastomotic leakage (AL) after surgical repair for esophageal atresia.

METHODS

Data from 85 neonates with esophageal atresia who underwent surgical correction were retrospectively analyzed. Conservative treatment had been adopted for AL. The incidence and severity of postoperative AL as well as its effects were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 85 neonates, postoperative AL occurred in 21 (25%) cases, with major leaks in 15 cases and minor leaks in 6. The stricture index of the 21 neonates with AL (0.615 ± 0.032) was significantly different (P = .008) from that of the 64 neonates without leakage (0.509 ± 0.018). The overall incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was 36%. Esophageal dysmotility and clinically significant tracheomalacia were observed in 69 and 7 infants, respectively, of the 80 surviving patients. The incidence of GER, dysmotility, and tracheomalacia in patients with or without AL was similar. The severity of GER in patients with different numbers of sessions of dilation was significantly different (P = .0015).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative esophageal AL is effectively treatable by conservative methods in most neonates. The occurrence of AL may aggravate the severity of esophageal stricture but does not affect the incidence of GER, esophageal dysmotility, and tracheomalacia.

A new technique in primary repair of congenital esophageal atresia preventing anastomotic stricture formation and describing the opening condition of blind pouch: plus ("+") incision

Anastomotic strictures are common and important problems following repair procedures of esophageal atresia. We hereby defined an anastomosis technique that could efficiently prevent this complication in 11 patients with esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). The proximal end of the atretic esophagus was opened with a plus (“+”)-shaped incision providing sufficient anastomosis width. Longitudinal incisions of 2 mm length were made on the anterior and posterior parts of the distal end according to the patients. The two ends were anastomosed with a primary suture at a single plain. We performed this technique on 11 patients, and in the 4-year follow-up period no dilatation proved necessary in any of our patients due to anastomotic strictures or symptomatic dysphagia. This technique that we have described provides a large zigzag anastomosis line and in this way minimizes the incidence of stricture formation. Furthermore, this technique, which we believe to have provided a new opinion on the topic of how to open the proximal end of an atretic esophagus, is quite easy and effective.

Application of MPVR and TL-VR with 64-row MDCT in neonates with congenital EA and distal TEF

AIM: To assess the application of multiple planar volume reconstruction (MPVR) and three-dimensional (3D) transparency lung volume rendering (TL-VR) with 64-row multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in neonates with congenital esophageal atresia (EA) and distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF).

METHODS: Twenty neonates (17 boys, 3 girls) with EA and distal TEF at a mean age of 4.6 d (range 1-16 d) were enrolled in this study. A helical scan of 64-row MDCT was performed at the 64 mm × 0.625 mm collimation. EA and TEF were reconstructed with MPVR and TL-VR, respectively. Initial diagnosis of EA was made by chest radiography showing the inserted catheter in the proximal blind-ended esophageal pouch. Manifestations of MDCT images were compared with the findings at surgery.

RESULTS: MDCT showed the proximal and distal esophageal pouches in 20 cases. No significant difference was observed in gaps between the proximal and distal esophageal pouches detected by MPVR and TL-VR. The lengths of gaps between the proximal and distal esophageal pouches detected by MPVR and TL-VR correlated well with the findings at surgery (R = 0.87, P < 0.001). The images of MPVR revealed the orifice of TEF in 13 cases, while TL-VR images showed the orifice of TEF in 4 cases.

CONCLUSION: EA and distal TEF can be reconstructed using MPVR and TL-VR of 64-row MDCT, which is a noninvasive technique to demonstrate the distal esophageal pouches and inter-pouch distance in neonates with EA and distal TEF.

Novel use of glycopyrrolate (Robinul) in the treatment of anastomotic leak after repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula

Anastomotic leak after tracheoesophageal fistula repair is a well-known complication and can represent a challenging clinical scenario. We present the case of an infant girl with VACTERL syndrome who underwent repair of a type C esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula repair, which was complicated by an anastomotic leak. Glycopyrrolate (Robinul), an anticholinergic agent, was successfully used to decrease copious salivary secretion and promote spontaneous closure of the leak. This report represents the first description in the medical literature of the use of glycopyrrolate in the treatment of an esophageal anastomotic leak. Glycopyrrolate may be a useful adjunct in the management of anastomotic leak after tracheoesophageal repair.

Esophageal stenting in children: indications, application, effectiveness, and complications

BACKGROUND

Use of esophageal stents is uncommon in children, and there are few reports. We report the first experience in predominantly small children and infants with retrievable, flexible stents designed for tracheobronchial use.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of initial experience with placement of esophageal stents for benign esophageal disorders in children.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

A pediatric, academic, tertiary-referral center.

PATIENTS

This study involved 7 pediatric patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Covered tracheobronchial stents were endoscopically placed in pediatric patients with benign esophageal conditions. Removal involved using forceps to pull the purse-string suture into the endoscope channel and collapsing the top of the stent for easy removal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of performing endoscopic stent placement in children and to establish criteria for early stent removal.

RESULTS

Six of 7 patients benefitted from stenting. There were no complications of placement. Novel techniques were developed for difficult retrievals. One patient did not benefit from esophageal stent placement, because the stent migrated downward from the uppermost part of the esophagus. One patient had some gagging, which led to early removal of the stent. A stent was removed emergently in 1 patient for respiratory distress.

LIMITATION

Small number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrievable, covered stents are easily placed and removed from the esophagus in small children. They should be considered for severe unrelenting strictures, especially when associated with esophageal leaks. A need exists for development of esophageal stents designed for pediatric use.

Surgical outcomes of esophageal atresia without fistula for 24 years at a single institution

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the surgical outcome of esophageal atresia (EA) without fistula for 24 years at a single tertiary center for pediatric surgery.

METHODS

The study used a retrospective chart review of infants diagnosed with EA without fistula between 1981 and 2005.

RESULTS

Of 33 patients with EA without fistula, 31 charts were available. Mean birth weight was 2327 g (range, 905-3390 g), and 71% were male. Most common associated anomalies were cardiac (n = 6; 19%) and renal (n = 5; 16%), followed by vertebral (n = 4; 13%) and anorectal (n = 2; 7%). The median initial esophageal gap was 5 vertebral bodies. Six had a primary repair, and 25 patients had esophageal replacement at a median age of 7 months. This involved gastric transposition in 20 (1 followed failed jejunal interposition), colonic interposition in 5, jejunal interposition in 1 (after a failed colonic), and repair at another center in 1. With a median review of 9 years, 21 patients had long-term sequelae with the need for multiple further surgical procedures including an antireflux procedure in 5. One patient died.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of EA without fistula remains challenging. Most patients required staged treatment that included esophageal replacement. The frequency of late complications indicates the need for programmed long-term review.