Safety of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children: analysis of 2050 elective ACS NSQIP-pediatric cases

Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children at paediatric centres and adult centres: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Paediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is performed by both paediatric and adult surgeons. The aim of this review was to compare outcomes at paediatric centres (PCs) and adult centres (ACs).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted, in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, for papers published between January 2000 and December 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata® version 16 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, US).

RESULTS

A total of 92 studies involving 74,852 paediatric LCs met the inclusion criteria. Over half (59%) of the LCs were performed at ACs. No significant differences were noted in the male-to-female ratio, mean age or mean body mass index between PCs and ACs. The main indications were cholelithiasis (34.1% vs 34.4% respectively, p=0.83) and biliary dyskinesia (17.0% vs 23.5% respectively, p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the median inpatient stay (2.52 vs 2.44 days respectively, p=0.89). Bile duct injury was a major complication (0.80% vs 0.37% respectively, p<0.01). Reoperation rates (2.37% vs 0.74% respectively, p<0.01) and conversion to open surgery (1.97% vs 4.74% respectively, p<0.01) were also significantly different. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in overall complications (p=0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of LCs performed, intraoperative cholangiography use and conversion rates were higher at ACs whereas bile duct injury and reoperation rates were higher at PCs. Despite a higher incidence of bile duct injury at PCs, the incidence at both PCs and ACs was <1%. In complex cases, a joint operation by both paediatric and adult surgeons might be a better approach to further improve outcomes. Overall, LC was found to be a safe operation with comparable outcomes at PCs and ACs.

Short-Stay Left Colectomy for Colon Cancer: Is It Safe?

BACKGROUND

Advances in surgical practices have decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) after surgery. This study aimed to determine the safety of short-stay (≤24-hour) left colectomy for colon cancer patients in the US.

STUDY DESIGN

Adult colon cancer patients who underwent elective left colectomies were identified using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database (2012 to 2021). Patients were categorized into 4 LOS groups: LOS 1 day or less (≤24-hour short stay), 2 to 4, 5 to 6, and 7 or more. Primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative overall and serious morbidity. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and readmission. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to explore the association between LOS and overall and serious morbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 15,745 patients who underwent left colectomies for colon cancer were identified with 294 (1.87%) patients undergoing short stay. Short-stay patients were generally younger and healthier with lower 30-day overall morbidity rates (LOS ≤1 day: 3.74%, 2 to 4: 7.38%, 5 to 6: 16.12%, and ≥7: 37.64%, p < 0.001). Compared with patients with LOS 2 to 4 days, no differences in mortality and readmission rates were observed. On adjusted analysis, there was no statistical difference in the odds of overall (LOS 2 to 4 days: odds ratio 1.90, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.60, p = 0.049) and serious morbidity (LOS 2 to 4 days: odds ratio 0.86, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.76, p = 0.672) between the short-stay and LOS 2 to 4 days groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although currently performed at low rates in the US, short-stay left colectomy is safe for a select group of patients. Attention to patient selection, refinement of clinical pathways, and close follow-up may enable short-stay colectomies to become a more feasible reality.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Applied to Pediatric Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Simple Cholelithiasis: Feasibility and Teaching Insights

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge after a cholecystectomy is a common practice in the adult population and has been demonstrated as safe and viable for children as well. However, there is a lack of comprehensive teaching models for pediatric cholecystectomy. Drawing inspiration from standardized outpatient procedures, this study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and feasibility of teaching programs and an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol following ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pediatric patients.

METHODS

In 2015, an ERAS pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was implemented, focusing on admission procedures, surgery timing, anesthetic choices, analgesia, postoperative feeding, mobilization, and pain assessment. Day-case surgery was not applicable for acute cholecystitis, choledochal lithiasis, sickle cell disease, and hereditary spherocytosis cases. The protocol was employed for a group of attending surgeons and fellows, as well as a group of residents under the supervision of experienced surgeons. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of ambulatory cholecystectomy in children and its utilization in training pediatric surgical trainees.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2020, a total of 33 patients were included from a cohort of 162 children who underwent LC, with 15 children operated on by senior surgeons and 18 by young surgeons. The primary diagnoses were symptomatic gallbladder lithiasis (n = 32) and biliary dyskinesia (n = 1). The median age at the time of surgery was 11.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 4.9-18), and the median duration of surgery was 54 min (IQR 13-145). One intraoperative complication occurred, involving gallbladder rupture and the dissemination of lithiasis into the peritoneal cavity. Three patients (9%) required an overnight stay, while no postoperative complications or readmissions within 30 days were observed. ERAS was successfully implemented in 30 patients (91%). No significant differences in surgical outcomes were noted between senior and young surgeons. At an average follow-up of 55 months, no long-term sequelae were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings align with the current trend of increasing use of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underscore its feasibility in the pediatric population. The application of a structured ERAS protocol appears viable and practical for training the next generation of pediatric surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Nationwide outcomes of incidental appendectomy during cholecystectomy versus cholecystectomy alone in children: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The utility of incidental appendectomy, appendectomy during another index surgery in the absence of appendicitis, has not been evaluated in the pediatric population during cholecystectomy. This study sought to compare nationwide outcomes after cholecystectomy with incidental appendectomy in children.

METHODS

Patients ≤ 18 years old who underwent cholecystectomy from 2010-2014 were identified from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. A propensity score-matched analysis (PSMA) with > 40 covariates including demographics, comorbidities, and hospitalization factors was performed between those receiving cholecystectomy alone versus incidental appendectomy at the time of cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

34,390 patients underwent cholecystectomy (median age 15 [13-17] years). Laparoscopic (92%) approach was utilized most frequently, with 2% requiring conversion to open cholecystectomy. PSMA demonstrated a higher frequency of perforation or laceration of adjacent organs occurring in those receiving cholecystectomy alone during index admission. No significant differences in readmissions within 30 days or the calendar year were detected. Those undergoing cholecystectomy alone had higher overall readmission costs ($11,783 [$4942-$39,836] vs. $6,100 [$2358-$19,719] cholecystectomy with appendectomy; p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

This nationwide PSMA indicates that incidental appendectomy in pediatric cholecystectomies is not associated with higher postoperative complications, cost, or readmissions. This suggests that incidental appendectomy during cholecystectomy is safe, cost-effective, and worthy of future study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy Outcomes for Pediatric Cancer Patients with Leukopenia: A NSQIP-pediatric Study

BACKGROUND

Children with cancer often develop leukopenia which may impair wound healing and increase surgical complication rates. When leukopenic children with cancer develop an acute surgical condition, the optimal management strategy remains unclear. This study examined the effect of preoperative leukopenia on postoperative outcomes in children with cancer who underwent an appendectomy or cholecystectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified cancer patients undergoing an appendectomy or cholecystectomy from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database from 2012-2018. Demographics and perioperative characteristics were compared by leukopenia status (WBC <4 vs. ≥4 × 10^3/mL). Postoperative length of stay (LOS) and 30-day composite complications, including infections, reoperations, and readmissions, were analyzed for each procedure using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

There were 227 children who underwent an appendectomy and 101 children who underwent a cholecystectomy. Leukopenia was seen in 93 (41.0%) appendectomy and 57 (56.4%) cholecystectomy cases. Nineteen (8.4%) appendectomy patients and six (5.9%) cholecystectomy patients developed a postoperative complication. The median postoperative LOS was 2 days (IQR 1-6 days) for appendectomy and 1 day (IQR 1-2.5 days) for cholecystectomy cases. After multivariate analyses, leukopenia was not associated with increased postoperative complications after an appendectomy (OR 0.55, P = 0.36) or cholecystectomy (OR 0.39, P = 0.37). There was no significant difference in postoperative LOS based on leukopenia status for children who underwent an appendectomy (P = 0.82) or cholecystectomy (P = 0.37).

CONCLUSION

In pediatric cancer patients, leukopenia was not associated with increased short-term postoperative complications or longer postoperative LOS after either an appendectomy or cholecystectomy. These results support that operative management can be performed safely in pediatric appendicitis and cholecystitis in leukopenic cancer patients.

Association of hospital and surgeon operative volumes and surgeon pediatric subspecialization with pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Most pediatric cholecystectomies are performed by adult general surgeons, but it is unclear whether outcomes differ by surgeon pediatric subspecialization, hospital procedure volume, or surgeon procedure volume. We aimed to determine whether higher hospital or surgeon laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) volume or surgeon pediatric subspecialization is associated with better outcomes after LC in children.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using statewide hospital discharge databases from the states of Florida, Georgia, and Iowa. We included children aged 4-18 years who underwent inpatient or outpatient LC for acute or chronic gallbladder disease in January 2010-August 2015. Propensity score weighting was used to estimate relationships between operative volumes or surgeon pediatric subspecialization and rates of readmission or emergency department (ED) visit within 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 5391 children were included (mean age 15.9 years, 81.6% female). Children operated on by surgeons with high LC volumes in hospitals with high LC volumes were less likely to experience a readmission or ED visit within 30 days (10.8% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.04). Additionally, children operated on by adult general surgeons in hospitals with high LC volumes were less likely to experience a readmission or ED visit within 30 days (10.9% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Children are less likely to be readmitted to the hospital or present to the ED after laparoscopic cholecystectomy if they receive their care from adult general surgeons at hospitals that frequently perform this procedure in both adults and children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Emergency department use and hospital admission in children following ambulatory surgery: a retrospective population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Paediatric ambulatory surgery (same day surgery and planned same day discharge) is more frequently being performed more in Canada and around the world; however, after surgery children may return to hospital, either through the emergency department (ED) or through a hospital admission (HA). The aim of this study was to determine the patient characteristics associated with ED visits and HA in the 3 days following paediatric ambulatory surgery.

METHODS

This population-based retrospective cohort study used de-identified health administrative database housed at ICES and included residents of Ontario, younger than 18 years of age, who underwent ambulatory surgery between 2014 and 2018. Patients were not involved in the design of this study. The proportion of ED visit and HA were calculated for the total cohort, and the type of surgery. The ORs and 95% CIs were calculated for each outcome using logistic regression.

RESULTS

83 468 children underwent select ambulatory surgeries. 2588 (3.1%) had an ED visit and 608 (0.7%) had a HA in the 3 days following surgery. The most common reasons for ED visits included pain (17.2%) and haemorrhage (10.5%). Reasons for HA included haemorrhage (24.8%), dehydration (21.9%), and pain (9.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that pain, bleeding and dehydration symptoms are associated with a return visit to the hospital. Implementing approaches to prevent, identify and manage these symptoms may be helpful in reducing ED visits or hospital admissions.

Factors Associated With Outcomes and Costs After Pediatric Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Importance

The prevalence of pediatric cholelithiasis is increasing with the epidemic of childhood obesity. With this rise, the outcomes and costs of pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy become an important public health and economic concern.

Objective

To assess patient and health system factors associated with the outcomes and costs after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among Canadian children.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective, population-based study of children 17 years and younger undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy from April 1, 2008, until March 31, 2015. The data source was the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database includes data from all Canadian hospitals. The analysis was limited to inpatient cholecystectomies. All Canadian children undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included.

Exposure

The exposure in this study was laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was all-cause morbidity, a composite outcome of any complication that prolonged length of stay by 24 hours or required a second, unplanned procedure. The cost of the index admission was also calculated as a secondary outcome. These outcomes of interest were determined before data analysis. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using multilevel logistic regression models.

Results

During the study period, 3519 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed; of these, 79.1% (n = 2785) were in girls, and 98.0% (n = 3450) were for gallstone disease. The overall morbidity rate was 3.9% (n = 137). After adjustment, patients with comorbidities were more susceptible to morbidity (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.78-3.86; P < .001). Operations for gallstones were less morbid. High-volume general surgeons had lower morbidity rates compared with low-volume pediatric surgeons (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12-0.69; P = .005) independent of pediatric volumes. The mean (SD) unadjusted cost of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy was $4115 ($7273). Operative indication, complications, comorbidities, emergency admission, and surgeon volume were associated with cost.

Conclusions and Relevance

The high-volume nature of adult general surgery translated to lower morbidity and cost after pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy, suggesting that adult volume is associated with pediatric outcomes. As the rate of pediatric gallstone disease increases, surgeon volume, rather than specialty training, should be considered when pursuing operative management.

Pediatric Biliary Dyskinesia: Evaluating Predictive Factors for Successful Treatment of Biliary Dyskinesia with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Biliary dyskinesia (BD) is a motility disorder of the gallbladder that can result in right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Cholecystectomy is considered the standard of care for BD. Up to 23 per cent of pediatric patients who undergo surgery for BD have persistent symptoms postoperatively. We performed a retrospective review to identify preoperative factors significantly associated with symptom resolution after cholecystectomy. We retrospectively reviewed pediatric patients aged 10–17 years diagnosed with BD who underwent cholecystectomy between 2006 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on postoperative symptom resolution. Chi-squared and student t tests were used to compare patient groups. Two hundred and thirty-six patients were included in the study. The most common preoperative symptoms included RUQ pain (80.1%), nausea (54.2%), postprandial pain (44.5%), vomiting (32.6%), and epigastric pain (19.9%). The rate of postoperative symptom resolution was 68.6 per cent. Comparative analysis showed patients who presented with RUQ pain, nausea, postprandial pain, or constipation experienced significantly higher rates of symptom resolution postoperatively. In addition, patients with ejection fraction <35 per cent or pain reproducible with cholecystokinin were found to have significantly higher rates of symptom resolution as well. To date, it remains difficult to predict successful outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing cholecystectomy for BD. In our study, patient demographics and duration of symptoms did not affect postoperative outcomes. Pediatric patients who presented with RUQ pain, nausea, postprandial pain, constipation, an ejection fraction of <35 per cent on hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid, or pain reproducible with cholecystokinin injection, were found to have significantly higher rates of symptom resolution.

Minimally Invasive Cholecystolithotomy to Treat Cholecystolithiasis in Children: A Single-center Experience With 23 Cases

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy is recently popularized treatment that may offer advantages over laparoscopic cholecystectomy, especially in China. However, there are few reports concerning the use of this technique in the pediatric population. This report describes our initial experience with minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy using laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy to treat cholecystolithiasis in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 23 pediatric patients with cholecystolithiasis who underwent minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy using laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy from January 2009 to December 2015 was performed.

RESULTS

The operations were successful in all 23 cases. None required conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The average operative time was 68 minutes (range, 45 to 97 min). The average bleeding volume during surgery was 30 mL (range, 10 to 55 mL). The average length of hospital stay was 5.2 days (range, 3 to 7 d). There were no perioperative complications. All patients were followed for 9 to 12 months without any obvious gastrointestinal symptoms. None had a recurrence of stones in the gall bladder.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive cholecystolithotomy using laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy is a safe and viable technique that may be used successfully in pediatric surgery.

Clinical Indicators of Admission for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Procedures

OBJECTIVES

A minority of children undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) are admitted overnight postoperatively, but there are little data on prognostic indicators. Our goal is to review national data to identify variables associated with admission and identify effects on outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the 2012-2015 American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (ACS NSQIP-P) program use files. The CI patients were identified by CPT code. Demographics, comorbidities, anesthesia time, total operation time, 30-day complications, and 30-day readmission were compared between ambulatory and admitted patients.

RESULTS

A total of 2943 CI patients were included, with 17.2% of these admitted post implantation. Single variable analysis revealed multiple factors associated with admission post implantation. Multivariable analysis showed patients with asthma were 2.2 times ( P < .001; odds ratio [OR] = 1.484-3.227) and those with structural central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities 2.1 times ( P < .001; OR = 1.584-2.706) more likely to be admitted. Younger age ( P = .002; OR = 0.995-0.999) and longer operation time ( P < .001; OR = 1.003-1.006) were weak predictors. Two hundred sixteen patients lacked any factors but were still admitted. They had similar outcomes to ambulatory healthy patients.

CONCLUSION

We identified factors associated with admission post-CI and higher readmission rates. Asthma and CNS abnormalities are strong predictors of admission post implantation. Forty-two percent of admitted patients lack any of these factors and have comparable outcomes to corresponding ambulatory patients.

Discrepancies in the Definition of "Outpatient" Surgeries and Their Effect on Study Outcomes Related to ACDF and Lumbar Discectomy Procedures: A Retrospective Analysis of 45,204 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To study the differences in definition of "inpatient" and "outpatient" [stated status vs. actual length of stay (LOS)], and the effect of defining populations based on the different definitions, for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and lumbar discectomy procedures in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There has been an overall trend toward performing ACDF and lumbar discectomy in the outpatient setting. However, with the possibility of patients who underwent outpatient surgery staying overnight or longer at the hospital under "observation" status, the distinction of "inpatient" and "outpatient" is not clear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent ACDF or lumbar discectomy in the 2005-2014 ACS-NSQIP database were identified. Outpatient procedures were defined in 1 of 2 ways: either as being termed "outpatient" or hospital LOS=0. Differences in definitions were studied. Further, to evaluate the effect of the different definitions, 30-day outcomes were compared between "inpatient" and "outpatient" and between LOS>0 and LOS=0 for ACDF patients.

RESULTS

Of the 4123 "outpatient" ACDF patients, 919 had LOS=0, whereas 3204 had LOS>0. Of the 13,210 "inpatient" ACDF patients, 337 had LOS=0, whereas 12,873 had LOS>0. Of the 15,166 "outpatient" lumbar discectomy patients, 8968 had LOS=0, whereas 6198 had LOS>0. Of the 12,705 "inpatient" lumbar discectomy patients, 814 had LOS=0, whereas 11,891 had LOS>0. On multivariate analysis of ACDF patients, when comparing "inpatient" with "outpatient" and "LOS>0" with "LOS=0" there were differences in risks for adverse outcomes based on the definition of outpatient status.

CONCLUSIONS

When evaluating the ACS-NSQIP population, ACDF and lumbar discectomy procedures recorded as "outpatient" can be misleading and often did not correlate with same day discharge. These findings have significant impact on the interpretation of existing studies and define an area that needs clarification for future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Definitional Differences of 'Outpatient' Versus 'Inpatient' THA and TKA Can Affect Study Outcomes

BACKGROUND

There has been great interest in performing outpatient THA and TKA. Studies have compared such procedures done as outpatients versus inpatients. However, stated "outpatient" status as defined by large national databases such as the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) may not be a consistent entity, and the actual lengths of stay of those patients categorized as outpatients in NSQIP have not been specifically ascertained and may in fact include some patients who are "observed" for one or more nights. Current regulations in the United States allow these "observed" patients to stay more than one night at the hospital under observation status despite being coded as outpatients. Determining the degree to which this is the case, and what, exactly, "outpatient" means in the NSQIP, may influence the way clinicians read studies from that source and the way hospital systems and policymakers use those data.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were (1) to utilize the NSQIP database to characterize the differences in definition of "inpatient" and "outpatient" (stated status versus actual length of stay [LOS], measured in days) for THA and TKA; and (2) to study the effect of defining populations using different definitions.

METHODS

Patients who underwent THA and TKA in the 2005 to 2014 NSQIP database were identified. Outpatient procedures were defined as either hospital LOS = 0 days in NSQIP or being termed "outpatient" by the hospital. The actual hospital LOS of "outpatients" was characterized. "Outpatients" were considered to have stayed overnight if they had a LOS of 1 day or longer. The effects of the different definitions on 30-day outcomes were evaluated using multivariate analysis while controlling for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of 72,651 patients undergoing THA, 529 were identified as "outpatients" but only 63 of these (12%) had a LOS = 0. Of 117,454 patients undergoing TKA, 890 were identified as "outpatients" but only 95 of these (11%) had a LOS = 0. After controlling for potential confounding factors such as gender, body mass index, functional status before surgery, comorbidities, and smoking status, we found "inpatient" THA to be associated with increased risk of any adverse event (relative risk, 2.643, p = 0.002), serious adverse event (relative risk, 2.455, p = 0.011), and readmission (relative risk, 2.775, p = 0.010) compared with "outpatient" THA. However, for the same procedure and controlling for the same factors, patients who had LOS > 0 were not associated with any increased risk compared with patients who had LOS = 0. A similar trend was also found in the TKA cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Future THA, TKA, or other investigations on this topic should consistently quantify the term "outpatient" because different definitions, stated status or actual LOS, may lead to different assignments of risk factors for postoperative complications. Accurate data regarding risk factors for complications after total joint arthroplasty are crucial for efforts to reduce length of hospital stay and minimize complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Does timing of gastroschisis repair matter? A comparison using the ACS NSQIP pediatric database

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on optimal timing of gastroschisis repair. The 2012-2014 ACS NSQIP Pediatric Participant Use Data File was used to compare outcomes of primary versus staged gastroschisis repair.

METHODS

Cases were divided into primary repair (0-1day) and staged repair (4-14days). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared for primary versus staged closure using Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables. Length of stay was compared after controlling for prematurity.

RESULTS

There were 627 subjects included, with 364 neonates in the primary group and 263 in the staged group. The primary group demonstrated shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (5.1days; p<0.001) and had less surgical site infections (OR=0.27; p=0.003), but had longer ventilator days (1.9days; p<0.001). Neonates in the primary repair group were less likely to be discharged home versus transferred to another hospital (OR=0.24; p=0.006) and more likely to require nutritional support at discharge (OR=1.74; p=0.034). No significant differences were identified for mortality, readmissions, postoperative LOS, sepsis or other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Staged repair of gastroschisis has longer LOS attributed to preoperative timing, but less ventilator days. Outcomes for these closure techniques are equivocal and support surgeons performing the closure technique they are most experienced with.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (Treatment: retrospective comparative study).