1
|
Re AD, Tooza S, Diab J, Karam C, Sarofim M, Ooi K, Turner C, Kozman D, Blomberg D, Morgan M. Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life. Ann Coloproctol 2023; 39:395-401. [PMID: 35417955 PMCID: PMC10626330 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2022.00073.0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS A retrospective audit of all rectal resections performed at a colorectal unit and associated private hospitals over the past 10 years was performed. Relevant demographic, operative, and histopathological data were collected. A prospective survey was performed regarding patients' quality of life and fecal continence. These patients were matched with nonAL patients who completed the same survey. RESULTS One hundred patients (out of 1,394 resections) were included. AL was contained in 66.0%, not contained in 10.0%, and only anastomotic stricture in 24.0%. Management was antibiotics only in 39.0%, percutaneous drainage in 9.0%, operative abdominal drainage in 19.0%, transrectal drainage in 6.0%, combination of percutaneous drainage and transrectal drainage in 2.0%, and combination abdominal/transrectal drainage in 1.0%. The 1-year stoma rate was 15.0%. Overall, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Instrument scores were higher for AL patients than their matched counterparts (8.06±10.5 vs. 2.92±4.92, P=0.002). Patients with an AL had a mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of 76.23±19.85; this was lower than the matched mean EQ-VAS for non-AL patients of 81.64±18.07, although not statistically significant (P=0.180). CONCLUSION The majority of AL patients in this study were managed with antibiotics only. AL was associated with higher fecal incontinence scores in the long-term; however, this did not equate to lower quality of life scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelina Di Re
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Salam Tooza
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jason Diab
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
| | - Charbel Karam
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
| | - Mina Sarofim
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
| | - Kevin Ooi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
- Department of General Surgery, Fairfield Hospital, Prairiewood, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine Turner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel Kozman
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - David Blomberg
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew Morgan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
- Department of General Surgery, Fairfield Hospital, Prairiewood, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gao Z, Luo H, Ma L, Bai D, Qin X, Bautista M, Gong L, Peng Y, Hu J, Tian Y. Efficacy and safety of anastomotic leak testing in gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:5265-5273. [PMID: 36971816 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10025-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomosis-related complications such as bleeding, leakage, and strictures, continue to be serious complications of gastric cancer surgery. Presently, these complications have yet to be reliably prevented. Here we design a comprehensive leak testing procedure which combines gastroscopy, air, and methylene blue (GAM) leak testing. We aimed to evaluated the efficacy and safety of the GAM procedure in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS Patients aged 18-85 years without an unresectable factor as confirmed via CT were enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial at a tertiary referral teaching hospital and were randomly assigned to two groups: intraoperative leak testing group (IOLT) and no intraoperative leak testing group (NIOLT). The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative anastomosis-related complications in the two groups. RESULTS 148 patients were initially randomly assigned to the IOLT group (n = 74) and to the NIOLT group (n = 74) between September 2018 and September 2022. After exclusions, 70 remained in the IOLT group and 68 in the NIOLT group. In the IOLT group, 5 patients (7.1%) were found to have anastomotic defects intraoperatively, which included anastomotic discontinuity, bleeding, and strictures. The NIOLT group had a higher incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage compared to the IOLT group: 4 patients (5.8%) vs 0 patients (0%), respectively. No GAM-related complications were observed. CONCLUSION The GAM procedure is an intraoperative leak test that can be performed safely and efficiently after a laparoscopic total gastrectomy. GAM anastomotic leak testing may effectively prevent technical defect-related anastomotic complications in patients with gastric cancer who undergo a gastrectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT04292496.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenguo Gao
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China
| | - Heng Luo
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China
| | - Longyin Ma
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China
| | - Dan Bai
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiangzhi Qin
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China
| | - Matthew Bautista
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Lei Gong
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China
| | - Yong Peng
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiani Hu
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Yunhong Tian
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chiarello MM, Fransvea P, Cariati M, Adams NJ, Bianchi V, Brisinda G. Anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Oncol 2022; 40:101708. [PMID: 35092916 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The safety of colorectal surgery for oncological disease is steadily improving, but anastomotic leakage is still the most feared and devastating complication from both a surgical and oncological point of view. Anastomotic leakage affects the outcome of the surgery, increases the times and costs of hospitalization, and worsens the prognosis in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. Anastomotic leakage has a wide range of clinical features ranging from radiological only finding to peritonitis and sepsis with multi-organ failure. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have been identified as early predictors of anastomotic leakage starting from postoperative day 2-3, but abdominal-pelvic computed tomography scan is still the gold standard for the diagnosis. Several treatments can be adopted for anastomotic leakage. However, there is not a universally accepted flowchart for the management, which should be individualized based on patient's general condition, anastomotic defect size and location, indication for primary resection and presence of the proximal stoma. Non-operative management is usually preferred in patients who underwent proximal faecal diversion at the initial operation. Laparoscopy can be attempted after minimal invasive surgery and can reduce surgical stress in patients allowing a definitive treatment. Reoperation for sepsis control is rarely necessary in those patients who already have a diverting stoma at the time of the leak, especially in extraperitoneal anastomoses. In patients without a stoma who do not require abdominal reoperation for a contained pelvic leak, there are several treatment options, including laparoscopic diverting ileostomy combined with trans-anal anastomotic tube drainage, percutaneous drainage or recently developed endoscopic procedures, such as stent or clip placement or endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy. We describe the current approaches to treat this complication, as well as the clinical tests necessary to diagnose and provide an effective therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pietro Fransvea
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Cariati
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery Unit, "San Giovanni di Dio" Hospital, Crotone, Italy
| | - Neill James Adams
- Department of Health Sciences, Clinical Microbiology Unit, "Magna Grecia" University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Valentina Bianchi
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Brisinda
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Management and 1-year outcomes of anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:929-939. [PMID: 33118101 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03777-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze different types of management and one-year outcomes of anastomotic leakage (AL) after elective colorectal resection. METHODS All patients with anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis (76/1,546; 4.9%), with the exclusion of cases with proximal diverting stoma, were followed-up for at least one year. Primary endpoints were as follows: composite outcome of one-year mortality and/or unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission and additional morbidity rates. Secondary endpoints were as follows: length of stay (LOS), one-year persistent stoma rate, and rate of return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT). RESULTS One-year mortality rate was 10.5% and unplanned ICU admission rate was 30.3%. Risk factors of the composite outcome included age (aOR = 1.08 per 1-year increase, p = 0.002) and anastomotic breakdown with end stoma at reoperation (aOR = 2.77, p = 0.007). Additional morbidity rate was 52.6%: risk factors included open versus laparoscopic reoperation (aOR = 4.38, p = 0.03) and ICU admission (aOR = 3.63, p = 0.05). Median (IQR) overall LOS was 20 days (14-26), higher in the subgroup of patients reoperated without stoma. At 1 year, a stoma persisted in 32.0% of patients, higher in the open (41.2%) versus laparoscopic (12.5%) reoperation group (p = 0.04). Only 4 out of 18 patients (22.2%) were able to RIOT. CONCLUSION Mortality and/or unplanned ICU admission rates after AL are influenced by increasing age and by anastomotic breakdown at reoperation; additional morbidity rates are influenced by unplanned ICU admission and by laparoscopic approach to reoperation, the latter also reducing permanent stoma and failure to RIOT rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT03560180.
Collapse
|
5
|
Granero L, Cienfuegos JA, Baixauli J, Pastor C, Sánchez Justicia C, Valentí V, Rotellar F, Hernández Lizoáin JL. Predictive Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications and Its Impact on Survival in Laparoscopic Resection for Colon Cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021; 31:558-564. [PMID: 33840737 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic resection is the ideal treatment of colon cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze the predictive factors for postoperative complications and their impact on oncologic outcomes in laparoscopic resections in colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS In all patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery the number and degree of severity of postoperative complications were recorded and classified according to Clavien-Dindo. A univariate analysis was made of the demographic, surgical, and oncologic variables of patients with and without complications. The statistically significant variables were then entered into a multivariate model. In both groups overall and disease-free survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS Of 524 patients, 138 (26.3%) experienced some type of complication, 110 less severe (79.7%) and 28 (20.4%) severe. Twenty-nine conversions to open surgery occurred (5.5%) and hospital mortality was 0.2%.In the multivariate analysis, use of corticosteroids [odds ratio (OR): 3.619], oral anticoagulants (OR: 3.49), blood transfusions (OR: 4.30), and conversion to open surgery (OR: 3.93) were significantly associated with the development of complications. However, sigmoid resections were associated with fewer complications (OR: 0.45).Overall 5-year and 10-year survival in both groups, was 83.3%, 74.1%, 76.0%, and 67.1%, respectively (P=0.18). Disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years, excluding stage IV tumors, was 88.6% and 90.4%, respectively (P=0.881). CONCLUSIONS The use of corticosteroids, oral anticoagulants, blood transfusions, and conversion to open surgery are all independent predictive factors of postoperative complications. Sigmoid resections are associated with fewer complications. In laparoscopic resections of the colon, complications do not negatively affect long-term oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Granero
- Department of General Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra
| | - Javier A Cienfuegos
- Department of General Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA)
- CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jorge Baixauli
- Department of General Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra
| | - Carlos Pastor
- Department of General Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra
| | - Carlos Sánchez Justicia
- Department of General Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra
| | - Víctor Valentí
- Department of General Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA)
- CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Halkias C, Zoikas A, Garoufalia Z, Konstantinidis MK, Ioannidis A, Wexner S. Re-Operative Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10071447. [PMID: 33916216 PMCID: PMC8036625 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Re-operative laparoscopic colorectal surgery is becoming increasingly common. It can be a challenging procedure, but its benefits can outweigh the associated risks. Methods: A systematic review of the literature reporting re-operative laparoscopic surgery was carried out. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies and case series were included, with case reports being excluded. Results: Seventeen articles dated from 2007 to 2020 were included in the systematic review. In total, 1555 patients were identified. Five hundred and seventy-four of them had a laparoscopic procedure and 981 an open re-operation. One hundred and eighty-three women had a laparoscopic operation. The median age ranged from to 44.9 years to 68.7 years. In seven studies, the indication of the index operation was malignancy, one study regarded re-laparoscopy for excision of lateral pelvic lymph nodes, and one study looked at redo surgery of ileal J pouch anal anastomosis. There were 16 mortalities in the laparoscopic arm (2.78%) and 93 (9.4%) in the open surgery arm. One hundred and thirty-seven morbidities were recorded in the open arm and 102 in the laparoscopic arm. Thirty-nine conversions to open occurred. The median length of stay ranged from 5.8 days to 19 days in laparoscopy and 9.7 to 34 days in the open surgery arm. Conclusions: Re-operative laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe when performed by experienced hands. The management of complications, recurrence of malignancy, and lateral pelvic floor dissection can be safely performed. The complication rate is low, with conversion to open procedures being relatively uncommon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantine Halkias
- General Surgery Department, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Athanasios Zoikas
- The 2nd Department of Surgery, Sismanoglio General Hospital of Attica, 15126 Athens, Greece;
| | - Zoe Garoufalia
- The 2nd Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Michalis K. Konstantinidis
- Department of General, Laparoscopic, Oncologic and Robotic Surgery, Athens Medical Center, 15125 Athens, Greece; (M.K.K.); (A.I.)
| | - Argyrios Ioannidis
- Department of General, Laparoscopic, Oncologic and Robotic Surgery, Athens Medical Center, 15125 Athens, Greece; (M.K.K.); (A.I.)
| | - Steven Wexner
- Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Laparoscopic Versus Open Re-operations Within 30 Days After Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery: a Retrospective Comparative Study. World J Surg 2021; 45:1548-1560. [PMID: 33506293 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-05970-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Re-operations within 30 days after lower gastrointestinal tract surgery are associated to high morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic approach has been reported as feasible and safe in selected patients, but comparative data to laparotomy are scarce. The aim of this study was to review our experience in laparoscopic re-operations and compare it to laparotomy. METHODS From January 2012 to December 2016, patients undergoing a re-operation within one month after lower gastrointestinal tract surgery were included and divided into laparoscopy and laparotomy groups. The primary endpoint was successful re-operation, defined as recovery without any of the following: conversion to laparotomy, need of further invasive treatments or death. Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and 30-day morbidity and mortality. Demographic, clinical and surgical characteristics were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Out of 114 patients who underwent a re-operation, 71 met the inclusion criteria. Thirty (42%) patients underwent laparoscopy and 41 (58%) laparotomy. Thirty (42%) patients were male and median age was 72.0 years-old. The initial operation was elective in 24 (34%) patients, and 50% of the initial operations were colorectal resections in both groups. Multivariate analyses showed that type of approach did not affect the re-operation success rate. Laparotomy was an independent predictor of prolonged hospital stay (OR 3.582, 95%CI 1.191-10.776, p = 0.023) and mortality (OR 13.123, 95%CI 1.301-131.579, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS Re-operations within 30 days after lower gastrointestinal tract surgery may be safe in selected patients, as effective as laparotomy, and associated with shorter hospital stay and lower mortality rates.
Collapse
|
8
|
Fransvea P, Costa G, D'Agostino L, Sganga G, Serao A. Redo-laparoscopy in the management of complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 25:371-383. [PMID: 33230649 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02374-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The laparoscopic approach for colorectal surgery has gradually become widely accepted for the treatment of both benign and malignant diseases thanks to its several advantages over the open approach. However, it is associated with the same potential postoperative complications. Some recent studies have analyzed the potential role of laparoscopy in early diagnosis and management of complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the outcomes of redo-laparoscopy (RL) for the management of early postoperative complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery, focusing on length of stay, morbidity and mortality. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines through MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Google Scholar from January 1990 to December 2019. The main outcomes examined were conversion rate, length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. A meta-analysis of all eligible studies was then conducted and forest plots were generated. RESULTS A total of 19 studies involving 1394 patients who required reoperation after laparoscopic colorectal resection were included. In 539 (38.2%) of these patients, a laparoscopic approach was adopted. The most common indication for returning to the operating theater was anastomotic leakage (64.4% of all redo-surgeries, 67.7% of RL) and the most common type of intervention performed in RL was diverting stoma with or without anastomotic repair/redo (47.1%). Nine studies were included in the pooled analysis. The mean length of stay was significantly shorter in the RL group than in the redo-open one (WMD = - 0.90; 95% CI - 1.04 to - 0.76; Z = - 12,6; p < 0.001). A significantly lower risk of mortality was observed in the RL cohort (OR = - 0.91; 95% CI - 1.58 to - 0.23; Z = - 2.62; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopy is a valid and effective approach for the treatment of complications following laparoscopic primary colorectal surgery thanks to it is well-established advantages over the open approach, which remain noticeable even in redo-surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Fransvea
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - G Costa
- Department of Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - L D'Agostino
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - G Sganga
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - A Serao
- General Surgery Department, Ospedale Dei Castelli, ASL RM 6, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baré M, Mora L, Pera M, Collera P, Redondo M, Escobar A, Anula R, Quintana JM. Type and Consequences of Short-Term Complications in Colon Cancer Surgery, Focusing on the Oldest Old. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2019; 19:e18-e25. [PMID: 31874739 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the proportion of colon cancer occurring in older patients is expected to increase, these patients may have more complications that may lead to serious consequences. The aim of this study was assess postoperative complications and their short-term consequences in colon cancer surgery according to age. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients undergoing surgery for primary invasive colon cancer in 22 centers between June 2010 and December 2012 were included. Presurgical and surgical variables were analyzed, and in-hospital major postoperative complications and its most serious consequence (no relevant, transfusion, reintervention, admission to the intensive care unit, or death) were estimated according to age group. Chi-square tests were used to analyze the possible associations between variables and age groups. RESULTS Data from 1976 patients, mean (range) age 68 (24-97) years, 62% men, were analyzed; 52.2% were aged > 69 years and 17.7% were aged > 79 years. The complication rate was 25.3%, reaching 30.9% in those aged ≥ 80 years. Older age was associated with a higher rate of postoperative infections during the hospital stay. The most common surgical complication in patients aged > 85 years was dehiscence of the anastomosis (11.5%). About 5% of patients with major complications died in the hospital (11.1% of those aged 80-84 years and 14.3% aged > 85 years). Among patients aged > 85 years, 38.1% required transfusions. CONCLUSION Older patients should receive appropriate functional preparation before the intervention, and when the risks of the intervention outweigh the potential benefits, a nonsurgical approach may be preferable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisa Baré
- Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain; Health Services Research on Chronic Diseases Network (REDISSEC), Spain.
| | - Laura Mora
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Miguel Pera
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Collera
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Althaia-Xarxa Assistencial Universitaria, Manresa, Spain
| | - Maximino Redondo
- Research Unit, Hospital Costa del Sol, University of Málaga, Marbella, Spain; Health Services Research on Chronic Diseases Network (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Antonio Escobar
- Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Spain; Health Services Research on Chronic Diseases Network (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Rocío Anula
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - José María Quintana
- Research Unit, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Spain; Health Services Research on Chronic Diseases Network (REDISSEC), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bashir Mohamed K, Hansen CH, Krarup PM, Fransgård T, Madsen MT, Gögenur I. The impact of anastomotic leakage on recurrence and long-term survival in patients with colonic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 46:439-447. [PMID: 31727475 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most severe complications following colorectal cancer surgery and is associated with increased short and long term mortality. The literature is conflicting regarding increased risk of recurrence after AL. The aim of this study was to systematically review the impact of anastomotic leakage on the risk of local or distant recurrence and overall survival, cancer specific survival, and disease-free survival. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, CINHAL, and The Cochrane Library was performed and meta-analyses were performed on all outcomes including analysis based on time-to-event data. RESULTS A total of eighteen cohort studies, including 69,047 patients whereof 2,555 patients had anastomotic leakage, were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant effects of anastomotic leakage on local recurrence (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.84-1.59) or distant recurrence (RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.52-3.96). Anastomotic leakage decreased overall survival (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.94), disease free survival (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.89), and cancer specific survival (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97). A time-to-event analysis was conducted on available data and the results were congruent with the frequency analyses. CONCLUSION Anastomotic leakage following colonic resections is significantly associated with impaired overall survival, disease free survival and cancer specific survival. The study did not show any statistically significant association between anastomotic leakage and recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khadra Bashir Mohamed
- Center for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebaekvej 1, 4600, Koege, Denmark.
| | - Christine Haangard Hansen
- Center for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebaekvej 1, 4600, Koege, Denmark
| | - Peter-Martin Krarup
- Center for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebaekvej 1, 4600, Koege, Denmark
| | - Tina Fransgård
- Center for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebaekvej 1, 4600, Koege, Denmark
| | - Michael Tvilling Madsen
- Center for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebaekvej 1, 4600, Koege, Denmark
| | - Ismail Gögenur
- Center for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebaekvej 1, 4600, Koege, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|