1
|
Kuroyanagi H, Hida K, Ishii Y, Yamamoto S, Hasegawa S, Takahashi K, Saida Y, Inomata M, Nakamura M, Sakai Y. Practice guidelines on endoscopic surgery for qualified surgeons by the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system: Large intestine. Asian J Endosc Surg 2024; 17:e13364. [PMID: 39079698 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Koya Hida
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Ishii
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seiichiro Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Suguru Hasegawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kenichi Takahashi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Saida
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, OITA University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiharu Sakai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Red Cross Hospital Osaka, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fujita Y, Hida K, Hoshino N, Akagi T, Nakajima K, Inomata M, Yamamoto S, Sakai Y, Naitoh T, Obama K. Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for rectal cancer in patients with obesity: short-term outcomes and relapse-free survival across age groups. Surg Today 2024:10.1007/s00595-024-02901-2. [PMID: 39102009 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02901-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in obese and older patients, who are often characterized by a higher prevalence of comorbidities and physical decline. METHODS This large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort study included 524 patients with a body mass index of 25 or higher who underwent either open or laparoscopic surgery for stage II or III rectal cancer between 2009 and 2013. We assessed the short-term outcomes and relapse-free survival by comparing these surgical modalities. The patients were stratified into 404 non-elderly (< 70 years) and 120 elderly (≥ 70 years) patients. RESULTS In both patient groups, laparoscopic surgery was associated with a significantly reduced blood loss (non-elderly: 41 vs. 545 ml; elderly: 50 vs. 445 ml) and shorter hospital stays (non-elderly: 10 vs. 19 days; elderly: 15 vs. 20 days) than open surgery. The overall complications and relapse-free survival showed no significant differences between the two surgical techniques in either age group. Additionally, the impact of the laparoscopic procedure on the relapse-free survival remained consistent between the age groups. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery offers short-term benefits for patients with obesity and rectal cancer compared to open surgery, regardless of age, without influencing the long-term prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Fujita
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Koya Hida
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Nobuaki Hoshino
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Tomonori Akagi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| | | | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| | - Seiichiro Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | | | - Takeshi Naitoh
- Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Obama
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoshino N, Hida K, Fujita Y, Ohira M, Ozawa H, Bando H, Akagi T, Kono Y, Nakajima K, Kojima Y, Nakamura T, Inomata M, Yamamoto S, Sakai Y, Naitoh T, Watanabe M, Obama K. Impact of laparoscopic surgery on short-term and long-term outcomes in elderly obese patients with colon cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:757-764. [PMID: 37663960 PMCID: PMC10472405 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic surgery is reported to be useful in obese or elderly patients with colon cancer, who are at increased risk of postoperative complications because of comorbidities and physical decline. However, its usefulness is less clear in patients who are both elderly and obese and may be at high risk of complications. Methods Data for obese patients (body mass index ≥25) who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery for stage II or III colon cancer between January 2009 and December 2013 were collected by the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared between patients who underwent open surgery and those who underwent laparoscopic surgery according to whether they were elderly (≥70 y) or nonelderly (<70 y). Results Data of 1549 patients (elderly, n = 598; nonelderly, n = 951) satisfied the selection criteria for analysis. Length of stay was shorter and surgical wound infection was less common in elderly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery than in those underwent open surgery. There were no significant between-group differences in overall complications, anastomotic leakage, ileus/small bowel obstruction, or RFS. There were also no significant differences in RFS after laparoscopic surgery according to patient age. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is safe in elderly obese patients with colon cancer and does not worsen their prognosis. There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery between obese patients who were elderly and those who were nonelderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuaki Hoshino
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Koya Hida
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Yusuke Fujita
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | | | - Heita Ozawa
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryTochigi Cancer CenterUtsunomiyaJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Bando
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryIshikawa Prefectural Central HospitalKanazawaJapan
| | - Tomonori Akagi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric SurgeryOita University Faculty of MedicineYufuJapan
| | - Yohei Kono
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric SurgeryOita University Faculty of MedicineYufuJapan
| | | | - Yutaka Kojima
- Department of Coloproctological SurgeryJuntendo University Faculty of MedicineBunkyo‐kuJapan
| | - Takatoshi Nakamura
- Department of Surgical OncologyDokkyo Medical University Graduate School of MedicineShimotsuga‐gunJapan
| | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric SurgeryOita University Faculty of MedicineYufuJapan
| | - Seiichiro Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokai University School of MedicineShibuya CityJapan
| | | | - Takeshi Naitoh
- Department of Lower Gastrointestinal SurgeryKitasato University School of MedicineSagamiharaJapan
| | | | - Kazutaka Obama
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vilsan J, Maddineni SA, Ahsan N, Mathew M, Chilakuri N, Yadav N, Munoz EJ, Nadeem MA, Abbas K, Razzaq W, Abdin ZU, Ahmed M. Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches to Treat Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Literature. Cureus 2023; 15:e38956. [PMID: 37313091 PMCID: PMC10259746 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgery is usually required to treat colorectal cancer (CRC). Medical technology has advanced, providing various approaches to tackle this disease. Different surgeries are available, such as laparoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, and robotic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery has several benefits including reduced blood loss and shorter recovery time. It can also improve lung function and minimize complications. However, it requires more time to perform and has a higher risk of complications during the procedure. Robotic surgery provides a three-dimensional view of the surgical area allowing for greater precision in rectal surgeries and access to difficult-to-reach pelvic regions. This method utilizes robotics technology which reduces surgical time and speeds up recovery for patients. There are various surgical options available for treating CRC; however, laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery offer unique advantages despite their own drawbacks. As technology continues to evolve, medical techniques will continue improving existing methods while providing new options resulting in better outcomes for patients. Compared to laparoscopy, robotic surgery has a lower rate of operative conversions and a shorter learning curve. However, it also has some drawbacks, such as a longer docking time, lack of tactile sensation, and higher cost. Therefore, the choice of surgical method should depend on patient characteristics, surgeon preference and expertise, and available resources. Currently, specialized centers offer robotic surgeries which are more expensive and take longer compared to open and laparoscopic approaches. Nonetheless, they are considered safe and feasible when compared to traditional surgery. Short-term outcomes for robotic surgeries are better, while long-term postoperative complication rates remain similar. However, there is a need for additional well-defined randomized control trials conducted across multiple centers to validate the use of robotic surgery over open and laparoscopic approaches. Improving patient care and outcomes is the objective of this comprehensive literature overview on surgical approaches for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Vilsan
- Surgery, Dr Bhausaheb Sardesai Talegaon Rural Hospital, Pune, IND
| | - Sai Aditya Maddineni
- Surgery, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, CUW
- Surgery, UChicago Medicine AdventHealth GlenOaks, Glen Oaks, USA
| | - Nayab Ahsan
- Internal Medicine, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, PAK
| | - Midhun Mathew
- Internal Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | - Nilay Yadav
- General Physician, Rama Medical College, Kanpur, IND
| | | | | | - Kiran Abbas
- Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAK
| | - Waleed Razzaq
- Internal Medicine, Services Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK
| | - Zain U Abdin
- Medicine, District Headquarter Hospital, Faisalabad, PAK
| | - Moiz Ahmed
- Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shiraishi T, Ogawa H, Shioi I, Ozawa N, Osone K, Okada T, Sohda M, Shirabe K, Saeki H. Differences in prognosis and underuse of adjuvant chemotherapy between elderly and non-elderly patients in stage III colorectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:91-101. [PMID: 36643370 PMCID: PMC9831896 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim We aimed to clarify the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and the prognosis of elderly colorectal cancer patients compared with non-elderly patients, and the usefulness of sarcopenia as an indicator for the introduction and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods Between 2013 and 2021, 215 patients with pStage III disease were included. We investigated perioperative clinicopathological factors, adjuvant chemotherapy details, and prognosis. Preoperative sarcopenia status was evaluated using computed tomography images. Elderly patients were defined as those aged ≥70 years. Results We included 121 (56.3%) and 94 (43.7%) non-elderly and elderly patients, respectively. Among the elderly patients, 47 had sarcopenia. There were no significant differences in the incompletion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy between elderly and non-elderly patients (27.1%/16.2%, P = 0.119). The most common reason for the discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy was side effects, regardless of age. The respective 3-year-disease free survival of patients with no/completed/incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy were 65.5%, 80.2%, and 57.7% for non-elderly patients (P = 0.045) and 73.4%, 70.6%, and 71.6% for elderly patients (P = 0.924). The number of elderly patients with sarcopenia was significantly higher in patients without adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.004) and those with incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.004). The 3-year-disease free survival of elderly sarcopenic patients without and with adjuvant chemotherapy were 78.3% and 59.2%, respectively (P = 0.833). Conclusion Elderly patients did not show a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of whether they had completed adjuvant chemotherapy, unlike non-elderly patients. Moreover, the evaluation of preoperative sarcopenia in elderly colorectal cancer patients may be useful in determining the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Shiraishi
- Department of General Surgical ScienceGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
| | - Hiroomi Ogawa
- Department of General Surgical ScienceGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
| | - Ikuma Shioi
- Department of General Surgical ScienceGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
| | - Naoya Ozawa
- Department of General Surgical ScienceGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
| | - Katsuya Osone
- Department of General Surgical ScienceGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
| | - Takuhisa Okada
- Department of General Surgical ScienceGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
| | - Makoto Sohda
- Department of General Surgical ScienceGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
| | - Ken Shirabe
- Department of General Surgical ScienceGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
| | - Hiroshi Saeki
- Department of General Surgical ScienceGunma University Graduate School of MedicineMaebashiJapan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Habbous S, Alibhai SMH, Menjak IB, Forster K, Holloway CMB, Darling G. The effect of age on the opportunity to receive cancer treatment. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 81:102271. [PMID: 36209661 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older adults with cancer may not receive the same opportunities for treatment as younger patients. In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we explored whether age was an independent predictor of receiving specialist consultation and treatment. METHODS Patients age 45-99 were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry having a primary solid tumor diagnosed between 01/Jan/2010 and 31/Dec/2019. We used logistic regression adjusted sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to compare the likelihood of consultation or receipt of treatment using linear splines at critical ages of 65, 80, and 90 years. RESULTS A total 168,232 (42%), 165,205 (41%), 57,360 (14%), and 7810 (2%) patients were diagnosed age 45-64, 65-79, 80-89, and 90-99, respectively. The likelihood of surgical consultation decreased as patients reached 65 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86 (0.84-0.89)], which decreased further among octogenarians [aOR 0.63 (0.59-0.67)]. Similar results were observed for consultation with a medical oncologist and radiation oncologist. Receipt of surgery also decreased with age. Three-month post-operative mortality was higher among older patients [aRR 1.38 (1.26-1.50) per 10 years, p < 0.0001], an effect that remained similar as patients reached age 65 + years of age (p = 0.09 for change). For stage I patients, 3-month post-operative survival was high across all age groups, ranging from 99.8% in 45-64 year-olds, 99.4% in 65-79 year-olds, and 98.1% among octogenarians and nonagenarians (lung, colorectal, breast, cervical cancer patients). CONCLUSION Older patients were less likely to have specialist consultations. More comprehensive data collection on clinical factors and referral patterns is needed to improve care for elderly cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Habbous
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 525 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ines B Menjak
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katharina Forster
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 525 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire M B Holloway
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 525 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gail Darling
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 525 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moro-Valdezate D, Martín-Arévalo J, Ferro-Echevarría Ó, Pla-Martí V, García-Botello S, Pérez-Santiago L, Gadea-Mateo R, Tarazona N, Roda D, Roselló-Keränen S, Espí-Macías A. Short-term outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery in older patients: a novel nomogram predicting postoperative morbi-mortality. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:3587-3597. [PMID: 36129528 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02688-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze short-term outcomes of curative-intent cancer surgery in all adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer undergoing surgery from January 2010 to December 2019 and determine risk factors for postoperative complications and mortality. METHODS Retrospective study conducted at a single tertiary university institution. Patients were stratified by age into two groups: < 75 years and ≥ 75 years. Primary outcome was the influence of age on 30-day complications and mortality. Independent risk factors for postoperative adverse events or mortality were analyzed, and two novel nomograms were constructed. RESULTS Of the 1486 patients included, 580 were older (≥ 75 years). Older subjects presented more comorbidities and tumors were located mainly in right colon (45.7%). After matching, no between-group differences in surgical postoperative complications were observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.3% for the older and 0.8% for the non-older group (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the independent risk factors for postoperative complications were peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, severe liver disease, postoperative transfusion, and surgical approach. Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality were age ≥ 80 years, cerebrovascular disease, severe liver disease, and postoperative transfusion. The model was internally and externally validated, showing high accuracy. CONCLUSION Patients aged ≥ 75 years had similar postoperative complications but higher 30-day mortality than their younger counterparts. Patients with peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, or severe liver disease should be informed of higher postoperative complications. But patients aged ≥ 80 suffering cerebrovascular disease, severe liver disease, or needing postoperative transfusion should be warned of significantly increased risk of postoperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Moro-Valdezate
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain. .,Department of Surgery, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - José Martín-Arévalo
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Surgery, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Vicente Pla-Martí
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Surgery, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Stephanie García-Botello
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Surgery, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Leticia Pérez-Santiago
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ricardo Gadea-Mateo
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain
| | - Noelia Tarazona
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Desamparados Roda
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susana Roselló-Keränen
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alejandro Espí-Macías
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.,Department of Surgery, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Elfrink AKE, Alberga AJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Scheurs WH, van der Geest LGM, Verhagen HJM, Dekker JWT, Grünhagen DJ, Wouters MWJM, Klaase JM. Outcomes After Major Surgical Procedures in Octogenarians: A Nationwide Cohort Study. World J Surg 2022; 46:2399-2408. [PMID: 35927369 PMCID: PMC9436861 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06642-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Aging of the worldwide population has been observed, and postoperative outcomes could be worse in elderly patients. This nationwide study assessed trends in number of surgical resections in octogenarians regarding various major surgical procedures and associated postoperative outcomes. Methods All patients who underwent surgery between 2014 and 2018 were included from Dutch nationwide quality registries regarding esophageal, stomach, pancreas, colorectal liver metastases, colorectal cancer, lung cancer and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). For each quality registry, the number of patients who were 80 years or older (octogenarians) was calculated per year. Postoperative outcomes were length of stay (LOS), 30 day major morbidity and 30 day mortality between octogenarians and younger patients. Results No increase in absolute number and proportion of octogenarians that underwent surgery was observed. Median LOS was higher in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer, colorectal liver metastases, lung cancer, pancreatic disease and esophageal cancer. 30 day major morbidity was higher in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colon cancer, esophageal cancer and elective AAA-repair. 30 day mortality was higher in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer, lung cancer, stomach cancer, pancreatic disease, esophageal cancer and elective AAA-repair. Median LOS decreased between 2014 and 2018 in octogenarians who underwent surgery for stomach cancer and colorectal cancer. 30 day major morbidity decreased between 2014 and 2018 in octogenarians who underwent surgery for colon cancer. No trends were observed in octogenarians regarding 30 day mortality between 2014 and 2018. Conclusion No increase over time in absolute number and proportion of octogenarians that underwent major surgery was observed in the Netherlands. Postoperative outcomes were worse in octogenarians. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00268-022-06642-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur K E Elfrink
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, 2333 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Anna J Alberga
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, 2333 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Locatie AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Universiteit Van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, 2333 AA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cheong CM, Golder AM, Horgan PG, McMillan DC, Roxburgh CSD. Evaluation of clinical prognostic variables on short-term outcome for colorectal cancer surgery: An overview and minimum dataset. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022; 31:100544. [PMID: 35248885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgery for colorectal cancer is associated with post-operative morbidity and mortality. Multiple systematic reviews have reported on individual factors affecting short-term outcome following surgical resection. This umbrella review aims to synthesize the available evidence on host and other factors associated with short-term post-operative complications. METHODS A comprehensive search identified systematic reviews reporting on short-term outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery using PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Web of Science from inception to 8th September 2020. All reported clinicopathological variables were extracted from published systematic reviews. RESULTS The present overview identified multiple validated factors affecting short-term outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection. In particular, factors consistently associated with post-operative outcome differed with the type of complication; infective, non-infective or mortality. A minimum dataset was identified for future studies and included pre-operative age, sex, diabetes status, body mass index, body composition (sarcopenia, visceral obesity) and functional status (ASA, frailty). A recommended dataset included antibiotic prophylaxis, iron therapy, blood transfusion, erythropoietin, steroid use, enhance recovery programme and finally potential dataset included measures of the systemic inflammatory response CONCLUSION: A minimum dataset of mandatory, recommended, and potential baseline variables to be included in studies of patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection is proposed. This will maximise the benefit of such study datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chee Mei Cheong
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow United Kingdom.
| | - Allan M Golder
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow United Kingdom
| | - Paul G Horgan
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow United Kingdom
| | - Donald C McMillan
- Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hashimoto S, Tominaga T, Nonaka T, To K, Wada H, Takeshita H, Fukuoka H, Araki M, Tanaka K, Sawai T, Nagayasu T. Short- and mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients ≥ 85 years old: a multicenter study using a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Today 2022; 52:1292-1298. [DOI: 10.1007/s00595-022-02468-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
11
|
Kryzauskas M, Bausys A, Kuliavas J, Bickaite K, Dulskas A, Poskus E, Bausys R, Strupas K, Poskus T. Short and long-term outcomes of elderly patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection with primary anastomosis for cancer. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:682. [PMID: 34876049 PMCID: PMC8650566 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02648-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The proportion of elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients requiring surgery is increasing. Colorectal resection for left-sided cancers is the most controversial as the primary anastomosis or end-colostomy and open or minimally invasive approaches are available. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients after resection with primary anastomosis for left-sided CRC. METHODS The cohort study included left-sided colorectal cancer patients who underwent resection with primary anastomosis. The participants were divided into non-elderly (≤75 years) and elderly (> 75 years) groups. Short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were investigated. RESULTS In total 738 (82%) and 162 (18%) patients were allocated to non-elderly and elderly groups, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was less prevalent in the elderly (42.6% vs 52.7%, p = 0.024) and a higher proportion of these suffered severe or lethal complications (15.4% vs 9.8%, p = 0.040). MIS decreased the odds for postoperative complications (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.19-0.89, p = 0.038). The rate of anastomotic leakage was similar (8.5% vs 11.7%, p = 0.201), although, in the case of leakage 21.1% of elderly patients died within 90-days after surgery. Overall- and disease-free survival was impaired in the elderly. MIS increased the odds for long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients suffer more severe complications after resection with primary anastomosis for left-sided CRC. The risk of anastomotic leakage in the elderly and non-elderly is similar, although, leakages in the elderly seem to be associated with a higher 90-day mortality rate. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with decreased morbidity in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Kryzauskas
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
| | - Augustinas Bausys
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Centre for Visceral Medicine and Translational Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Justas Kuliavas
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | | | - Eligijus Poskus
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Rimantas Bausys
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kestutis Strupas
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Tomas Poskus
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Podda M, Sylla P, Baiocchi G, Adamina M, Agnoletti V, Agresta F, Ansaloni L, Arezzo A, Avenia N, Biffl W, Biondi A, Bui S, Campanile FC, Carcoforo P, Commisso C, Crucitti A, De'Angelis N, De'Angelis GL, De Filippo M, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Ercolani G, Fraga GP, Gabrielli F, Gaiani F, Guerrieri M, Guttadauro A, Kluger Y, Leppaniemi AK, Loffredo A, Meschi T, Moore EE, Ortenzi M, Pata F, Parini D, Pisanu A, Poggioli G, Polistena A, Puzziello A, Rondelli F, Sartelli M, Smart N, Sugrue ME, Tejedor P, Vacante M, Coccolini F, Davies J, Catena F. Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:35. [PMID: 34215310 PMCID: PMC8254305 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00378-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Although rectal cancer is predominantly a disease of older patients, current guidelines do not incorporate optimal treatment recommendations for the elderly and address only partially the associated specific challenges encountered in this population. This results in a wide variation and disparity in delivering a standard of care to this subset of patients. As the burden of rectal cancer in the elderly population continues to increase, it is crucial to assess whether current recommendations on treatment strategies for the general population can be adopted for the older adults, with the same beneficial oncological and functional outcomes. This multidisciplinary experts' consensus aims to refine current rectal cancer-specific guidelines for the elderly population in order to help to maximize rectal cancer therapeutic strategies while minimizing adverse impacts on functional outcomes and quality of life for these patients. METHODS The discussion among the steering group of clinical experts and methodologists from the societies' expert panel involved clinicians practicing in general surgery, colorectal surgery, surgical oncology, geriatric oncology, geriatrics, gastroenterologists, radiologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and endoscopists. Research topics and questions were formulated, revised, and unanimously approved by all experts in two subsequent modified Delphi rounds in December 2020-January 2021. The steering committee was divided into nine teams following the main research field of members. Each conducted their literature search and drafted statements and recommendations on their research question. Literature search has been updated up to 2020 and statements and recommendations have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. A modified Delphi methodology was implemented to reach agreement among the experts on all statements and recommendations. CONCLUSIONS The 2021 SICG-SIFIPAC-SICE-WSES consensus for the multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer aims to provide updated evidence-based statements and recommendations on each of the following topics: epidemiology, pre-intervention strategies, diagnosis and staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgery, watch and wait strategy, adjuvant chemotherapy, synchronous liver metastases, and emergency presentation of rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "D. Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gianluca Baiocchi
- ASST Cremona, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Winterthur - University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Ferdinando Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, AULSS2 Trevigiana del Veneto, Vittorio Veneto, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- 1st General Surgery Unit, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Nicola Avenia
- SC Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Biondi
- Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Simona Bui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabio C Campanile
- Department of Surgery, ASL VT - Ospedale "San Giovanni Decollato - Andosilla", Civita Castellana, Italy
| | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Claudia Commisso
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Antonio Crucitti
- General and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Cristo Re Hospital and Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola De'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, Regional General Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Gian Luigi De'Angelis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Poissy and Saint Germain en Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | | | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Federica Gaiani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | | | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ari K Leppaniemi
- Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrea Loffredo
- UOC Chirurgia Generale - AOU san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Tiziana Meschi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma Geriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, USA
| | | | | | - Dario Parini
- Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Adolfo Pisanu
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "D. Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gilberto Poggioli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Polistena
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Pietro Valdoni Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza Università degli Studi di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Puzziello
- UOC Chirurgia Generale - AOU san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- SC Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | - Michael E Sugrue
- Letterkenny University Hospital and CPM sEUBP Interreg Project, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | | | - Marco Vacante
- Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A good preoperative immune prognostic index is predictive of better long-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy compared with open gastrectomy for stage II gastric cancer in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:1814-1826. [PMID: 34076769 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08461-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains inconclusive whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has better long-term outcomes when compared with open gastrectomy (OG) for elderly gastric cancer (EGC). We attempted to explore the influence of the immune prognostic index (IPI) on the prognosis of EGCs treated by LG or OG to identify a population among EGC who may benefit from LG. METHODS We included 1539 EGCs treated with radical gastrectomy from January 2007 to December 2016. Propensity score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare the LG and OG groups. The IPI based on dNLR ≥ cut-off value (dNLR) and sLDH ≥ cut-off value (sLDH) was developed, characterizing two groups (IPI = 0, good, 0 factors; IPI = 1, poor, 1 or 2 factors). RESULTS Of the 528 EGCs (LG: 264 and OG: 264), 271 were in the IPI = 0 group, and 257 were in the IPI = 1 group. In the entire cohort, the IPI = 0 group was associated with good 5-year overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.003) compared to the IPI = 1 group; no significant differences in 5-year OS and PFS between the LG and OG groups were observed. In the IPI = 1 cohort, there was no significant difference in OS or PFS between the LG and OG groups across all tumor stages. However, in the IPI = 0 cohort, LG was associated with longer OS (p = 0.015) and PFS (p = 0.018) than OG in stage II EGC, but not in stage I or III EGC. Multivariate analysis showed that IPI = 0 was an independent protective factor for stage II EGC receiving LG, but not for those receiving OG. CONCLUSION The IPI is related to the long-term prognosis of EGC. Compared with OG, LG may improve the 5-year survival rate of stage II EGC with a good IPI score. This hypothesis needs to be further confirmed by prospective studies.
Collapse
|
14
|
The Trends in Adoption, Outcomes, and Costs of Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly Population. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:766-774. [PMID: 32424686 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04517-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The elderly constitute the majority of both colorectal cancer and surgical volume. Despite established safety and feasibility, laparoscopy may remain underutilized for colorectal cancer resections in the elderly. With proven benefits, increasing laparoscopy in elderly colorectal cancer patients could substantially improve outcomes. Our goal was to evaluate utilization and outcomes for laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. METHODS A national inpatient database was reviewed for elective inpatient resections for colorectal cancer from 2010 to 2015. Patients were stratified into elderly (≥ 65 years) and non-elderly cohorts (< 65 years), then grouped into open or laparoscopic procedures. The main outcomes were trends in utilization by approach and total costs, length of stay (LOS), readmission, and complications by approach in the elderly. Multivariable regression models were used to control for differences across platforms, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS Laparoscopic adoption for colorectal cancer in the elderly increased gradually until 2013, then declined, with simultaneously increasing rates of open surgery. Laparoscopy significantly improved all primary outcomes compared to open surgery (all p < 0.01). From the adjusted analysis, laparoscopy reduced complications by 30%, length of stay by 1.99 days, and total costs by $3276/admission. Laparoscopic patients were 34% less likely to be readmitted; when readmitted, the episodes were less expensive when index procedure was laparoscopic. CONCLUSION The adoption of laparoscopy for colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly is slow and even declining recently. In addition to the clinical benefits, there are reduced overall costs, creating a tremendous value proposition if use can be expanded. PRECIS This national contemporary study shows the slow uptake and recent decline in adaption of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly, despite the benefits in clinical outcomes and costs found. This data can be used to target education, regionalization, and quality improvement efforts in this expanding population.
Collapse
|
15
|
Peltrini R, Imperatore N, Carannante F, Cuccurullo D, Capolupo GT, Bracale U, Caricato M, Corcione F. Age and comorbidities do not affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in elderly patients. A multi-institutional cohort study in 287 patients. Updates Surg 2021; 73:527-537. [PMID: 33586089 PMCID: PMC8005386 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-00990-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative complications and mortality rates after rectal cancer surgery are higher in elderly than in non-elderly patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether, like in open surgery, age and comorbidities affect postoperative outcomes limiting the benefits of a laparoscopic approach. Between April 2011 and July 2020, data of 287 patients with rectal cancer submitted to laparoscopic rectal resection from different institutions were collected in an electronic database and were categorized into two groups: < 75 years and ≥ 75 years of age. Perioperative data and short-term outcomes were compared between these groups. Risk factors for postoperative complications were determined on multivariate analysis, including age groups and previous comorbidities as variables. Seventy-seven elderly patients had both higher ASA scores (p < 0.001) and cardiovascular disease rates (p = 0.02) compared with 210 non-elderly patients. There were no significative differences between groups in terms of overall postoperative complications (p = 0.3), number of patients with complications (p = 0.2), length of stay (p = 0.2) and death during hospitalization (p = 0.9). The only independent variables correlated with postoperative morbidity were male gender (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.53-3.68, p < 0.01) and low-medium localization of the tumor (OR 2.12; 75% CI 1.43-4.21, p < 0.01). Although older people are more frail patients, short-term postoperative outcomes in patients ≥ 75 years of age were similar to those of younger patients after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic rectal resection as well as non-elderly patient, despite advanced age and comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Peltrini
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Nicola Imperatore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.,Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AORN Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Filippo Carannante
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Campus BioMedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Umberto Bracale
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Caricato
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Campus BioMedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Corcione
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Evaluation of short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 80 years old: a propensity score-matched analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:365-375. [PMID: 33026476 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03770-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE It remains controversial whether the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) are beneficial in elderly patients (EP, age ≥ 80 years). The present study aimed to evaluate whether age itself is an independent risk factor for laparoscopic surgery by comparing short- and long-term outcomes between non-EP and EP groups. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 730 consecutive patients with stage I-III CRC who had undergone elective surgery between 2010 and 2017, using propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS Median follow-up was 49 months. After matching, we enrolled 228 patients. In the matched cohort, estimated operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node dissection ≥ D3, number of lymph nodes harvested < 12, conversion rate, multivisceral resection rate, postoperative complication rate, and length of postsurgical stay were similar between the two groups. Before matching, compared with the non-EP group, the EP group had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (p < 0.01), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.01), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.01), and higher frequency of local recurrence (LR) (p = 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in terms of incidence of LR or CSS between the two groups in the matched cohort. Prior to matching, multivariate analysis identified age ≥ 80 years as an independent prognostic factor for OS (p < 0.01), CSS (p < 0.01), and RFS (p = 0.01); however, after matching, age ≥ 80 years was not an independent poor prognostic factor for OS or CCS. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic surgery offers a safe, effective option for CRC in EP aged ≥ 80 years.
Collapse
|
17
|
Perioperative Management of Elderly patients (PriME): recommendations from an Italian intersociety consensus. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32:1647-1673. [PMID: 32651902 PMCID: PMC7508736 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01624-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical outcomes in geriatric patients may be complicated by factors such as multiple comorbidities, low functional performance, frailty, reduced homeostatic capacity, and cognitive impairment. An integrated multidisciplinary approach to management is, therefore, essential in this population, but at present, the use of such an approach is uncommon. The Perioperative Management of Elderly patients (PriME) project has been established to address this issue. AIMS To develop evidence-based recommendations for the integrated care of geriatric surgical patients. METHODS A 14-member Expert Task Force of surgeons, anesthetists, and geriatricians was established to develop evidence-based recommendations for the pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of hospitalized older patients (≥ 65 years) undergoing elective surgery. A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus, and the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence was rated using the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force criteria. RESULTS A total of 81 recommendations were proposed, covering preoperative evaluation and care (30 items), intraoperative management (19 items), and postoperative care and discharge (32 items). CONCLUSIONS These recommendations should facilitate the multidisciplinary management of older surgical patients, integrating the expertise of the surgeon, the anesthetist, the geriatrician, and other specialists and health care professionals (where available) as needed. These roles may vary according to the phase and setting of care and the patient's conditions.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kim HH, Ihn MH, Lee YH, Lee J, Yun S, Cho SW. Effect of Age on Laparoscopic Surgery and Postoperative Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer. Ann Coloproctol 2020; 36:229-242. [PMID: 32054245 PMCID: PMC7508477 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2019.10.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the postoperative complications of laparoscopic colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery and the adverse events of postoperative chemotherapy in elderly patients compared to younger patients and to identify the factors influencing the termination of postoperative chemotherapy. METHODS Between June 2015 and May 2018, 188 patients with CRC underwent laparoscopic surgery with curative intent. Patients aged ≥ 70 were defined as elderly. Postoperative complications and adverse events of chemotherapy were assessed by using the Clavien-Dindo classification and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, respectively. The clinicopathological factors were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were considered elderly with a mean age of 77.5 ± 5.5 years. Overall postoperative complications occurred in 68 patients (36.2%). Age and primary tumor location were independent predictors of overall postoperative complications. Smoking history was the only independent predictor of major postoperative complications. Of 113 patients who were recommended postoperative chemotherapy, 90 patients (79.6%) received postoperative chemotherapy. Overall adverse events occurred in 40 patients (44.4%). The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification and chemotherapy regimen were significantly associated with overall adverse events. The chemotherapy regimen was the only factor significantly associated with severe adverse events. Of 90 patients, postoperative chemotherapy could not be completed in 11 (12.2%). Age was the only factor significantly associated with stopping postoperative chemotherapy (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION This study shows that laparoscopic CRC surgery and postoperative chemotherapy were feasible in elderly patients. Further efforts are needed to ensure that elderly patients have the opportunity to make informed decisions regarding postoperative chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Hee Kim
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myong Hoon Ihn
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yun Hee Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jihyoun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sangchul Yun
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Woo Cho
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|