1
|
Xu YJ, Tao D, Qin SB, Xu XY, Yang KW, Xing ZX, Zhou JY, Jiao Y, Wang LL. Prediction of pathological complete response and prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:2508-2518. [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is currently the third most common malignant tumor and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Except for pathological examination after resection, it is not known exactly whether LARC patients have achieved pathological complete response (pCR) before surgery. To date, there are no clear clinical indicators that can predict the efficacy of nCRT and patient outcomes.
AIM To investigate the indicators that can predict pCR and long-term outcomes following nCRT in patients with LARC.
METHODS Clinical data of 128 LARC patients admitted to our hospital between September 2013 and November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into pCR and non-pCR groups. Univariate analysis (using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test) and logistic multivariate regression analysis were used to study clinical predictors affecting pCR. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and differences in survival curves were assessed with the log-rank test.
RESULTS Univariate analysis showed that pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), time interval between neoadjuvant therapy completion and total mesorectal excision, and tumor size were correlated with pCR. Multivariate results showed that CEA ≤ 5 ng/mL (P = 0.039), LMR > 2.73 (P = 0.023), and time interval > 10 wk (P = 0.039) were independent predictors for pCR. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients in the pCR group had significantly higher 5-year DFS rates (94.7% vs 59.7%, P = 0.002) and 5-year OS rates (95.8% vs 80.1%, P = 0.019) compared to the non-pCR group. Tumor deposits (TDs) were significantly correlated with shorter DFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION Pretreatment CEA, LMR, and time interval contribute to predicting nCRT efficacy in LARC patients. Achieving pCR demonstrates longer DFS and OS. TDs correlate with poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Jun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Dan Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Song-Bing Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Kai-Wen Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Zhong-Xu Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ju-Ying Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yang Jiao
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Li-Li Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu YJ, Tao D, Qin SB, Xu XY, Yang KW, Xing ZX, Zhou JY, Jiao Y, Wang LL. Prediction of pathological complete response and prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:2520-2530. [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is currently the third most common malignant tumor and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Except for pathological examination after resection, it is not known exactly whether LARC patients have achieved pathological complete response (pCR) before surgery. To date, there are no clear clinical indicators that can predict the efficacy of nCRT and patient outcomes.
AIM To investigate the indicators that can predict pCR and long-term outcomes following nCRT in patients with LARC.
METHODS Clinical data of 128 LARC patients admitted to our hospital between September 2013 and November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into pCR and non-pCR groups. Univariate analysis (using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test) and logistic multivariate regression analysis were used to study clinical predictors affecting pCR. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and differences in survival curves were assessed with the log-rank test.
RESULTS Univariate analysis showed that pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), time interval between neoadjuvant therapy completion and total mesorectal excision, and tumor size were correlated with pCR. Multivariate results showed that CEA ≤ 5 ng/mL (P = 0.039), LMR > 2.73 (P = 0.023), and time interval > 10 wk (P = 0.039) were independent predictors for pCR. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients in the pCR group had significantly higher 5-year DFS rates (94.7% vs 59.7%, P = 0.002) and 5-year OS rates (95.8% vs 80.1%, P = 0.019) compared to the non-pCR group. Tumor deposits (TDs) were significantly correlated with shorter DFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION Pretreatment CEA, LMR, and time interval contribute to predicting nCRT efficacy in LARC patients. Achieving pCR demonstrates longer DFS and OS. TDs correlate with poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Jun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Dan Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Song-Bing Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Kai-Wen Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Zhong-Xu Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ju-Ying Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yang Jiao
- School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Li-Li Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Owens PW, Saeed M, McCawley N, Loughlin P, Kearney DE, Burke JP, McNamara DA, Sahebally SM. Prolonged interval to surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgeon 2024; 22:166-173. [PMID: 38521683 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), followed by surgery after an interval of 6-8 weeks, represents standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Increasing this interval may improve rates of complete pathological response (pCR) and tumour downstaging. We performed a meta-analysis comparing standard (SI, within 8 weeks) versus longer (LI, after 8 weeks) interval from NCRT to surgery. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to 31 August 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SI with LI after NCRT for LARC were included. The primary endpoint was pCR rate. Secondary endpoints included rates of R0 resection, circumferential resection margin positivity (+CRM), TME completeness, lymph node yield (LNY), operative duration, tumour downstaging (TD), sphincter preservation, mortality, postoperative complications, surgical site infection (SSI) and anastomotic leak (AL). Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. RESULTS Four RCTs encompassing 867 patients were included. There were 539 males (62.1%). LI was associated with a higher pCR rate (OR 0.61, 95%CI = 0.39-0.95, p = 0.03), and more TD (OR 0.60, 95%CI = 0.37-0.97, p = 0.04) compared to SI. However, there was no difference in rates of R0 resection (p = 0.87), +CRM (p = 0.66), sphincter preservation (p = 0.26), incomplete TME (p = 0.49), LNY (p = 0.55), SSI (p = 0.33), AL (p = 0.20), operative duration (p = 0.07), mortality (p = 0.89) or any surgical complication (p = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS A LI to surgery after NCRT for LARC increases pCR and TD rates. Local recurrence or survival were not assessed due to unavailable data. We recommend deferring TME until after an interval of 8 weeks following completion of NCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P W Owens
- Dept of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - M Saeed
- Dept of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - N McCawley
- Dept of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - P Loughlin
- Dept of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - D E Kearney
- Dept of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - J P Burke
- Dept of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - D A McNamara
- Dept of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - S M Sahebally
- Dept of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kimura C, Crowder SE, Kin C. Is It Really Gone? Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:703-711. [PMID: 36417142 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00889-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Non-operative management of rectal cancer is a feasible and appealing treatment option for patients who develop a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. However, identifying patients who are complete responders is often a challenge. This review aims to present and discuss current evidence and recommendations regarding the assessment of treatment response in rectal cancer. METHODS A review of the current literature on rectal cancer restaging was performed. Studies included in this review explored the optimal interval between the end of neoadjuvant therapy and restaging, as well as modalities of assessment and their diagnostic performance. RESULTS The current standard for restaging rectal cancer is a multimodal assessment with the digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and T2-weighted MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging. Other diagnostic procedures under investigation are PET/MRI, radiomics, confocal laser endomicroscopy, artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy, cell-free DNA, and prediction models incorporating one or more of the above-mentioned exams. CONCLUSION Non-operative management of rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach. Understanding of the robustness and limitations of each exam is critical to inform patient selection for that treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cintia Kimura
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, H3680K94305, USA
| | - Sarah Elizabeth Crowder
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, H3680K94305, USA
- Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Cindy Kin
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, H3680K94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Andrikopoulou A, Theofanakis C, Markellos C, Kaparelou M, Koutsoukos K, Apostolidou K, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A, Dimopoulos MA, Zagouri F, Liontos M. Optimal Time Interval between Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Interval Debulking Surgery in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3519. [PMID: 37444629 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited data on the optimal time interval between the last dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC). METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC who received NACT followed by IDS during a 15-year period (January 2003-December 2018) in our Institution. RESULTS Overall, 115 patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC were included. The median age of diagnosis was 62.7 years (IQR: 14.0). A total of 76.5% (88/115) of patients were diagnosed with IIIC HGSC and 23.5% (27/115) with IV HGSC. Median PFS was 15.7 months (95% CI: 13.0-18.5), and median OS was 44.7 months (95% CI: 38.8-50.5). Patients were categorized in groups according to the time interval from NACT to IDS: <4 weeks (group A); 4-5 weeks (group B); 5-6 weeks (group C); >6 weeks (group D). Patients with a time interval IDS to NACT ≥4 weeks had significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.002). Median PFS was 26.6 months (95% CI: 24-29.2) for patients undergoing IDS <4 weeks after NACT vs. 14.4 months (95% CI: 12.6-16.2) for those undergoing IDS later (p = 0.004). Accordingly, median OS was 66.3 months (95% CI: 39.1-93.4) vs. 39.4 months (95% CI: 31.8-47.0) in the <4 week vs. >4 week time interval NACT to IDS groups (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, the short time interval (<4 weeks) from NACT to IDS was an independent factor of PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that performing IDS within four weeks after NACT may be associated with better survival outcomes. Multidisciplinary coordination among ovarian cancer patients is required to avoid any unnecessary delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeliki Andrikopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Charalampos Theofanakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Markellos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Kaparelou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Koutsoukos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Kleoniki Apostolidou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Michalis Liontos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aslanov K, Atici AE, Karaman D, Bozkurtlar E, Yegen ŞC. Optimal waiting period to surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectum cancer: a retrospective observational study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:210. [PMID: 37227524 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02930-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal waiting period after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancers is still controversial. The literature has different results regarding the effect of waiting periods on clinical and oncological outcomes. We aimed to investigate the effects of these different waiting periods on clinical, pathological, and oncological outcomes. METHODS Between January 2014 and December 2018, a total of 139 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, who were treated in the Department of General Surgery at the Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, were enrolled in the study. The patients were split into three groups according to waiting time for surgery after neoadjuvant treatment: group 1 (n = 51) included patients that have 7 weeks and less (≤ 7 weeks) time interval, group 2 (n = 45) 8 to 10 weeks (8-10 weeks), group 3 (n = 43) 11 weeks and above (11 weeks ≤). Their database records, which were entered prospectively, were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS There were 83 (59.7%) males and 56 (40.3%) females. The median age was 60 years, and there was no statistical difference between the groups regarding age, gender, BMI, ASA score, ECOG performance score, tumor location, and preoperative CEA values. Also, we found no significant differences regarding operation times, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. According to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification, severe early postoperative complications (CD 3 and above) were observed in 9 patients. The complete pathological response (pCR, ypT0N0) was observed in 21 (15.1%) patients. The groups had no significant difference regarding 3-year disease-free and 3-year overall survival (p = 0.3, p = 0.8, respectively). Local recurrence was observed in 12 of 139 (8.6%) patients and distant metastases occurred in 30 of 139 (21.5%) patients during the follow-up period. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of both local recurrence and distant metastasis (p = 0.98, p = 0.43, respectively). CONCLUSION The optimal time for postoperative complications and sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is 8-10 weeks. The different waiting periods do not affect disease-free and overall survival. While long-term waiting time does not make a difference in pathological complete response rates, it negatively affects the TME quality rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khayal Aslanov
- Department of General Surgery, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Emre Atici
- Department of General Surgery, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Damlanur Karaman
- Department of Pathology, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emine Bozkurtlar
- Department of Pathology, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Şevket Cumhur Yegen
- Department of General Surgery, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cerdan-Santacruz C, São Julião GP, Vailati BB, Corbi L, Habr-Gama A, Perez RO. Watch and Wait Approach for Rectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12082873. [PMID: 37109210 PMCID: PMC10143332 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The administration of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorrectal excision (TME) and selective use of adjuvant chemotherapy can still be considered the standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, avoiding sequelae of TME and entering a narrow follow-up program of watch and wait (W&W), in select cases that achieve a comparable clinical complete response (cCR) to nCRT, is now very attractive to both patients and clinicians. Many advances based on well-designed studies and long-term data coming from big multicenter cohorts have drawn some important conclusions and warnings regarding this strategy. In order to safely implement W&W, it is important consider proper selection of cases, best treatment options, surveillance strategy and the attitudes towards near complete responses or even tumor regrowth. The present review offers a comprehensive overview of W&W strategy from its origins to the most current literature, from a practical point of view focused on daily clinical practice, without losing sight of the most important future prospects in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Cerdan-Santacruz
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Coloproctology, Clínica Santa Elena, 28003 Madrid, Spain
| | - Guilherme Pagin São Julião
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo 01329-020, Brazil
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil
| | - Bruna Borba Vailati
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo 01329-020, Brazil
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil
| | - Leonardo Corbi
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo 01329-020, Brazil
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil
| | - Angelita Habr-Gama
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo 01329-020, Brazil
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Oliva Perez
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo 01329-020, Brazil
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu Z, Zhang Z, Liu H, Chen J. Time to surgery does not affect oncologic outcomes in locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Future Oncol 2023; 19:397-408. [PMID: 36919890 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: The authors conducted a meta-analysis to determine the association between time-to-surgery (TTS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patient outcomes in locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify potential studies, in which the authors compared patient outcomes between those with TTS within 4 (and 6) weeks of completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those after 4 (and 6) weeks. Results: Six studies, including 1238 patients, were eligible for inclusion. Pooled data showed no significant differences in rates of pathological complete response, major pathological response, ypN0, complications, R0 resection and operative time between groups of longer TTS and shorter TTS. Conclusion: There was no statistically advantageous impact of prolonged TTS on pathological and surgical outcomes. Large, population-based studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zining Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhening Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis & Translational Research, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis & Translational Research, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Junbing Chen
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis & Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kang MK. Implications of recent neoadjuvant clinical trials on the future practice of radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:1011-1025. [PMID: 36844136 PMCID: PMC9950859 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i6.1011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades, the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has been neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus total mesorectal excision followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) and immunotherapy are two major issues in the treatment of LARC. In the two latest phase III randomized controlled trials (RAPIDO and PRODIGE23), the TNT approach achieved higher rates of pathologic complete response and distant metastasis-free survival than conventional chemoradiotherapy. Phase I/II clinical trials have reported promising response rates to neoadjuvant (chemo)-radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Accordingly, the treatment paradigm for LARC is shifting toward methods that increase the oncologic outcomes and organ preservation rate. However, despite the progress of these combined modality treatment strategies for LARC, the radiotherapy details in clinical trials have not changed significantly. To guide future radiotherapy for LARC with clinical and radiobiological evidence, this study reviewed recent neoadjuvant clinical trials evaluating TNT and immunotherapy from a radiation oncologist’s perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Kyu Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 40414, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Roeder F, Gerum S, Hecht S, Huemer F, Jäger T, Kaufmann R, Klieser E, Koch OO, Neureiter D, Emmanuel K, Sedlmayer F, Greil R, Weiss L. How We Treat Localized Rectal Cancer-An Institutional Paradigm for Total Neoadjuvant Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225709. [PMID: 36428801 PMCID: PMC9688120 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)-the neoadjuvant employment of radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) as well as chemotherapy (CHT) before surgery-may lead to increased pathological complete response (pCR) rates as well as a reduction in the risk of distant metastases in locally advanced rectal cancer. Furthermore, increased response rates may allow organ-sparing strategies in a growing number of patients with low rectal cancer and upfront immunotherapy has shown very promising early results in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high/mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors. Despite the lack of a generally accepted treatment standard, we strongly believe that existing data is sufficient to adopt the concept of TNT and immunotherapy in clinical practice. The treatment algorithm presented in the following is based on our interpretation of the current data and should serve as a practical guide for treating physicians-without any claim to general validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Stefan Hecht
- Department of Radiology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Florian Huemer
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute—Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (CCCIT), Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tarkan Jäger
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Reinhard Kaufmann
- Department of Radiology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Eckhard Klieser
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Cancer Cluster Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Oliver Owen Koch
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Daniel Neureiter
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Cancer Cluster Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Felix Sedlmayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute—Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (CCCIT), Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lukas Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute—Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (CCCIT), Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-57255-25801
| |
Collapse
|