1
|
Pergialiotis V, Papageorgiou D, Douligeris A, Mortaki A, Vlachos DE, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. Awareness, knowledge and attitudes of human papillomavirus infection, screening and vaccination: a survey study in Greece. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 309:2031-2040. [PMID: 38459177 PMCID: PMC11018653 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07398-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the awareness and existing knowledge of a portion of the Greek population about prevention, screening, and HPV vaccination. METHODS A questionnaire designed in Google forms has been distributed through social media between June 2021 and December 2021 in men and women aged > 16 years old. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 20.0 program. Inferential analysis was performed to evaluate differences in responses among men and women. RESULTS We enrolled 2685 participants. Of those, 2285 were women, 386 were men, while 14 respondents chose not to respond to this question. Various age groups were detected with those aged between 26 and 30 years old being the predominant one. Participants with a higher education constituted 36.5% of the population. Most respondents were married (59.8%). In socioeconomic terms 75.5% of participants were employed whereas, monthly income ranged between 1000 and 1500 euros in the predominant group (36.8%). Only 40% of females and 3.9% of males were vaccinated against HPV. Adolescent immunization, acceptability rates reached 92.7% among female and 82.1% among male responders. Although, only a small proportion of the participants were not aware of the existence of HPV, 24.1% of males and 23.4% of females had the impression that condom use may provide absolute immunity to HPV and only 51.6% of males and 60.4% of females were aware about the high prevalence of HPV in the general population. Logistic regression analysis indicated that male participants as well as those aged > 50 years and those choosing to reject vaccination had decreased knowledge of the basic pathophysiology of HPV infection, as well as knowledge related to the existence and use of HPV DNA as a screening tool and the existence and efficacy of HPV vaccination. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that although awareness of the existence of HPV infection is high in Greek general population, the actual perception of the pathophysiology of transmission and importance of HPV testing and vaccination is low. Targeting specific population groups is essential to help increase HPV coverage and screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue 80, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Papageorgiou
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue 80, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Douligeris
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue 80, Athens, Greece.
| | - Anastasia Mortaki
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue 80, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Efthymios Vlachos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue 80, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue 80, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue 80, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue 80, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodolakis I, Liontos M, Pergialiotis V, Haidopoulos D, Kaparelou M, Efthimios Vlachos D, Dimopoulos MA, Loutradis D, Rodolakis A, Bamias A, Thomakos N. Chemotherapy response score as a predictor of survival in ovarian cancer patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 296:233-238. [PMID: 38479209 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The chemotherapy response score (CRS) has been widely adopted as a predictive tool for ovarian cancer survival. In the present study, we seek to define differences in survival rates among patients grouped in the traditionally established three-tiered system and those who have not been offered debulking surgery. STUDY DESIGN We designed a retrospective cohort study involving women treated with chemotherapy and offered interval or late debulking surgery for ovarian cancer. Twenty-eight women were not considered for a debulking procedure for various reasons. Of the 89 women who were finally offered interval debulking or late debulking surgery, 28 had a CRS 1 score, 34 had a CRS 2 score and 27 had a CRS 3 score. RESULTS Significant differences were noted in the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients based on the CRS stratification, although survival rates were considerably longer for all three groups compared to those of patients who were not offered surgery. Cox regression univariate analysis revealed that suboptimal debulking and CRS 1 or no surgery had a significant negative impact on PFS and OS rates. The binary stratification of CRS (CRS 1-2 vs CRS 3) revealed comparable differences in the PFS and OS to those in the groups that were stratified as platinum resistant and platinum sensitive. CONCLUSION The chemotherapy response score is a significant determinant of ovarian cancer survival that helps evaluate the risk of early disease relapse and death and may soon be useful in guiding patient-tailored treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Rodolakis
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
| | - Michalis Liontos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Vasilios Pergialiotis
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Kaparelou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Efthimios Vlachos
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | | | - Dimitrios Loutradis
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haidopoulos D, Pergialiotis V, Papageorgiou M, Halaska MJ, Maxova K, Ulrich E, Zapardiel I, Rodolakis A, Gultekin M, Fotopoulou C. Lower Limb Lymphedema Awareness among Gynecological Cancer Patients: An International Survey Supported by the European Network of Gynecological Cancer Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Group. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1544. [PMID: 38672626 PMCID: PMC11048365 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient awareness of postoperative lymphedema in the field of gynecologic oncology has been poorly documented in the international literature. We wished to capture and document the awareness among gynecological cancer survivors about postoperative lymphedema, including aspects such as the adequacy of perioperative counseling, management, and quality of life. METHODS A web-based survey comprising 25 multiple-choice questions was distributed to gynecological cancer advocacy groups within the European Network of Gynecological Cancer Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) group. The survey was validated in a pilot group of gynecological patients prior to distribution. RESULTS Overall, 386 women from 20 countries completed the questionnaire. Only half of the patients (n = 211) knew what lymphedema is, whereas 52% of the respondents stated that they were never informed at their pre-operative assessment about the potential risk of developing lymphedema. Fifty-three percent of those women who were informed about the risk and management of lymphedema received information through self-initiative, connecting mainly with patient groups or online. Approximately 84% of patients with lymphedema reported that they informed their doctor about their symptoms. Ninety-four patients (55.3%, which is not 55% of the 386) were treated for lymphedema. Forty-five women out of 136 reported that lymphedema significantly affected their everyday lives. DISCUSSION We report a large lack of awareness and a significant gap of knowledge about the risks and treatment options related to postoperative lymphedema among gynecological cancer survivors. Institutional practice routines and awareness among professionals need to be urgently recalled and adapted to adequately inform and support gynecological cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Lour Street, 11522 Athens, Greece; (D.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Vasilios Pergialiotis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Lour Street, 11522 Athens, Greece; (D.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Maria Papageorgiou
- "Erifyle" K.E.F.I. Gynecological Cancer Advocacy Group, 11526, Athens, Greece;
| | - Michael J. Halaska
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 11000 Prague, Czech Republic; (M.J.H.); (K.M.)
| | - Katerina Maxova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 11000 Prague, Czech Republic; (M.J.H.); (K.M.)
| | - Elena Ulrich
- N.N.Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, 197758 St. Petersburg, Russia;
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2 Lour Street, 11522 Athens, Greece; (D.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Murat Gultekin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara 06230, Turkey;
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London, London W12 0HS, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pergialiotis V, Thomakos N, Papalios T, Lygizos V, Vlachos DE, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Predictive Biomarker of Post-Operative Infectious Morbidity in Gynecological Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study. Nutr Cancer 2024; 76:364-371. [PMID: 38369888 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2024.2318827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Malnutrition significantly impacts the post-operative process of gynecological cancer patients. A prominent variable for determining perioperative morbidity is the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). To investigate PNI's predictive value on the risk of post-operative infections, we conducted a prospective cohort study involving women who underwent surgery for gynecological malignancies. Out of the 208 patients enrolled, 28 (13.5%) were malnourished and post-operative infections occurred in 43 patients. Notably, there was a significant difference in PNI between patients who developed infections and those who did not (p = 0.027), as well as between malnourished patients and those with normal nutritional status (p = 0.043). Univariate analysis showed that preoperative PNI predicts the risk of post-operative infections better than post-operative white blood cell count (AUC of 0.562 vs 0.375). However, the most accurate diagnostic results in the multivariate analysis were obtained from random forest and classification tree models (AUC of 0.987 and 0.977, respectively). Essentially, PNI and post-operative white blood cell count provided the best information gain according to rank probabilities. In conclusion, PNI appears to be a critical parameter that merits further investigation during the preoperative evaluation of gynecological malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Theodoros Papalios
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasilios Lygizos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Efthimios Vlachos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pergialiotis V, Zachariou E, Lygizos V, Vlachos DE, Stamatakis E, Angelou K, Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D. Splenectomy as Part of Maximal-Effort Cytoreductive Surgery in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:790. [PMID: 38398182 PMCID: PMC10887116 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A splenectomy is frequently performed during debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. Its impact on perioperative and survival outcomes remains questionable as current evidence is conflicting. In the present study, we sought to determine the factors that affect survival rates in ovarian cancer patients that undergo a splenectomy as part of maximal-effort cytoreduction. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted that included all epithelial ovarian cancer patients that had surgical cytoreduction for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Differences among splenectomized and non splenectomized patients were evaluated as well as the impact of known risk factors on survival outcomes of splenectomized patients. RESULTS Overall, 245 patients were identified and 223 were included in the present series, of whom 91 had a splenectomy. Recurrence rates as well as death rates were comparable among splenectomized and non-splenectomized patients; however, both the disease-free survival (log-rank = 0.001), as well as the overall survival of splenectomized patients (log-rank = 0.006), was shorter. Thrombotic events as well as rates of pulmonary embolism were comparable. Sepsis was more common among splenectomized patients. The site of splenic metastases did not influence patients' survival. Among splenectomized patients, those offered primary debulking had longer progression-free survival (log-rank = 0.042), although their overall survival did not differ compared to patients submitted to interval debulking. Complete debulking significantly improved the overall survival compared to optimal debulking (log-rank = 0.047). Splenectomized patients that developed sepsis had worse overall survival (log-rank = 0.005). DISCUSSION The findings of our study support the feasibility of splenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer; however, its impact on patients' survival is considerable. Therefore, every effort should be made to avoid splenic injury which will result in unintended splenectomy for non-oncological reasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, “Alexandra” General Hospital, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (V.L.); (D.E.V.); (E.S.); (K.A.); (G.D.); (N.T.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pandraklakis A, Haidopoulos D, Lappas T, Stamatakis E, Valsamidis D, Oikonomou MD, Loutradis D, Rodolakis A, Bisch SP, Nelson G, Thomakos N. Thoracic epidural analgesia as part of an enhanced recovery program in gynecologic oncology: a prospective cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1794-1799. [PMID: 37652530 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of thoracic epidural analgesia as part of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) multimodal analgesic protocol in patients with gynecologic oncology who have undergone laparotomy for suspected or confirmed malignancy. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study, following an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway, among patients who had undergone laparotomy for confirmed or suspected gynecological malignancy between January 2020 and September 2021. All patients who underwent laparotomy at the gynecologic oncology department for the aforementioned reason during that time were considered eligible. Patients (n=217) were divided into two groups: epidural (n=118) and non-epidural (n=99) group. Both groups were treated with the standard ERAS departmental analgesic protocol. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay, complications, and readmission rates. RESULTS Data from 217 patients (epidural group, n=118 vs non-epidural group, n=99) with median age of 61 years (IQR 53-68) were analyzed. The most common type of cancer was of ovarian origin (85/217, 39.2%, p=0.055) and median (Aletti) surgical complexity score was 3 (p=0.42). No differences were observed in the patients' demographics, clinical, and surgical characteristics. Primarily, median length of stay was 4 days in both groups with statistically significant lower IQR in the epidural group (3-5 vs 4-5, p=0.021). Complication rates were more common in the non-epidural group (38/99, 38.3% vs 36/118, 30.5%, p<0.001) with similar rates of grade III (p=0.51) and IV (0%) complications and readmission rates (p=0.51) between the two groups. Secondarily, the epidural group showed lower pain scores (p<0.001) on the day of surgery and in the first post-operative day (p<0.001), higher mobilization rates on the day of surgery (94.1% vs 57.6%, p<0.001), faster removal of urinary catheter (p<0.001), shorter time to flatus (p<0.001), and less nausea on the day of surgery (p<0.001). CONCLUSION In this study we showed that thoracic epidural analgesia, when used as part of an ERAS protocol, is safe and offers more favorable pain relief along with a number of additional benefits, improving the peri-operative experience of patients with gynecologic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasios Pandraklakis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Theodoros Lappas
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Stamatakis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Valsamidis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria D Oikonomou
- The Fertility Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Loutradis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Steven P Bisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Panagakis G, Papapanagiotou IK, Theofanakis C, Tsetsa P, Kontogeorgi A, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. Detection of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Women Diagnosed with Low-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Cytology. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2139. [PMID: 38004279 PMCID: PMC10672316 DOI: 10.3390/life13112139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The authors attempt to address the importance of timely detection and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to prevent cervical cancer. The study focused on the potential of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) as an adjunct to colposcopy, aiming to enhance the accuracy of identifying high-grade cervical lesions. Colposcopy, a widely used technique, exhibited variable sensitivity in detecting high-grade lesions, which relies on the expertise of the operator. The study's primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of combining colposcopy with EIS in detecting high-grade cervical lesions among patients initially diagnosed with low-grade CIN based on cytology. We employed a cross-sectional observational design, recruiting 101 women with abnormal cervical cytology results. The participants underwent colposcopy with acetic acid and subsequent EIS using the ZedScan device. The ZedScan results are categorized into color-coded probability levels, with red indicating the highest likelihood of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) occurrence. Results revealed that ZedScan exhibits a sensitivity rate of 89.5% and a specificity rate of 84% for detecting high-grade lesions. Colposcopy, on the other hand, recorded a sensitivity rate of 85.5% and a specificity rate of 92%. The agreement rate between ZedScan and biopsy is 79.2%, as indicated by a kappa coefficient of 0.71, while the agreement rate between colposcopy and biopsy is 74.3%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.71.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Panagakis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, 4-2 Lourou, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (G.P.); (I.K.P.); (C.T.); (P.T.); (N.T.); (A.R.); (D.H.)
| | - Ioannis K. Papapanagiotou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, 4-2 Lourou, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (G.P.); (I.K.P.); (C.T.); (P.T.); (N.T.); (A.R.); (D.H.)
| | - Charalampos Theofanakis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, 4-2 Lourou, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (G.P.); (I.K.P.); (C.T.); (P.T.); (N.T.); (A.R.); (D.H.)
| | - Paraskevi Tsetsa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, 4-2 Lourou, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (G.P.); (I.K.P.); (C.T.); (P.T.); (N.T.); (A.R.); (D.H.)
| | - Adamantia Kontogeorgi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon General Hospital, University of Athens, Rimini 1, 124 62 Haidari, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, 4-2 Lourou, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (G.P.); (I.K.P.); (C.T.); (P.T.); (N.T.); (A.R.); (D.H.)
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, 4-2 Lourou, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (G.P.); (I.K.P.); (C.T.); (P.T.); (N.T.); (A.R.); (D.H.)
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, 4-2 Lourou, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (G.P.); (I.K.P.); (C.T.); (P.T.); (N.T.); (A.R.); (D.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Andrikopoulou A, Theofanakis C, Markellos C, Kaparelou M, Koutsoukos K, Apostolidou K, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A, Dimopoulos MA, Zagouri F, Liontos M. Optimal Time Interval between Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Interval Debulking Surgery in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3519. [PMID: 37444629 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited data on the optimal time interval between the last dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC). METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC who received NACT followed by IDS during a 15-year period (January 2003-December 2018) in our Institution. RESULTS Overall, 115 patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC were included. The median age of diagnosis was 62.7 years (IQR: 14.0). A total of 76.5% (88/115) of patients were diagnosed with IIIC HGSC and 23.5% (27/115) with IV HGSC. Median PFS was 15.7 months (95% CI: 13.0-18.5), and median OS was 44.7 months (95% CI: 38.8-50.5). Patients were categorized in groups according to the time interval from NACT to IDS: <4 weeks (group A); 4-5 weeks (group B); 5-6 weeks (group C); >6 weeks (group D). Patients with a time interval IDS to NACT ≥4 weeks had significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.002). Median PFS was 26.6 months (95% CI: 24-29.2) for patients undergoing IDS <4 weeks after NACT vs. 14.4 months (95% CI: 12.6-16.2) for those undergoing IDS later (p = 0.004). Accordingly, median OS was 66.3 months (95% CI: 39.1-93.4) vs. 39.4 months (95% CI: 31.8-47.0) in the <4 week vs. >4 week time interval NACT to IDS groups (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, the short time interval (<4 weeks) from NACT to IDS was an independent factor of PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that performing IDS within four weeks after NACT may be associated with better survival outcomes. Multidisciplinary coordination among ovarian cancer patients is required to avoid any unnecessary delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeliki Andrikopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Charalampos Theofanakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Markellos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Kaparelou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Koutsoukos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Kleoniki Apostolidou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Michalis Liontos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Adisa A, Bahrami-Hessari M, Bhangu A, George C, Ghosh D, Glasbey J, Haque P, Ingabire JCA, Kamarajah SK, Kudrna L, Ledda V, Li E, Lillywhite R, Mittal R, Nepogodiev D, Ntirenganya F, Picciochi M, Simões JFF, Booth L, Elliot R, Kennerton AS, Pettigrove KL, Pinney L, Richard H, Tottman R, Wheatstone P, Wolfenden JWD, Smith A, Sayed AE, Goswami AG, Malik A, Mclean AL, Hassan A, Nazimi AJ, Aladna A, Abdelgawad A, Saed A, Abdelmageed A, Ghannam A, Mahmoud A, Alvi A, Ismail A, Adesunkanmi A, Ebrahim A, Al-Mallah A, Alqallaf A, Durrani A, Gabr A, Kirfi AM, Altaf A, Almutairi A, Sabbagh AJ, Ajiya A, Haddud A, Alnsour AAM, Singh A, Mittal A, Semple A, Adeniran A, Negussie A, Oladimeji A, Muhammad AB, Yassin A, Gungor A, Tarsitano A, Soibiharry A, Dyas A, Frankel A, Peckham-Cooper A, Truss A, Issaka A, Ads AM, Aderogba AA, Adeyeye A, Ademuyiwa A, Sleem A, Papa A, Cordova A, Appiah-Kubi A, Meead A, Nacion AJD, Michael A, Forneris AA, Duro A, Gonzalez AR, Altouny A, Ghazal A, Khalifa A, Ozair A, Quzli A, Haddad A, Othman AF, Yahaya AS, Elsherbiny A, Nazer A, Tarek A, Abu-Zaid A, Al-Nusairi A, Azab A, Elagili A, Elkazaz A, Kedwany A, Nuhu AM, Sakr A, Shehta A, Shirazi A, Mohamed AMI, Sherif AE, Awad AK, Abbas AM, Abdelrahman AS, Ammar AS, Azzam AY, Ciftci AB, Dural AC, Sanli AN, Rahy-Martín AC, Tantri AR, Khan A, Al-Touny A, Tariq A, Gmati A, Costas-Chavarri A, Auerkari A, Landaluce-Olavarria A, Puri A, Radhakrishnan A, Ubom AE, Pradhan A, Turna A, Adepiti A, Kuriyama A, Kassam AF, Hassouneh A, El-Hussuna A, Habeebullah A, Ads AM, Mousli A, Biloslavo A, Hoang A, Kirk A, Santini A, Melero AV, Calvache AJN, Baduell A, Chan A, Abrate A, Balduzzi A, Sánchez AC, Navarrete-Peón A, Porcu A, Brolese A, Barranquero AG, Saibene AM, Adam AA, Vagge A, Maquilón AJ, Leon-Andrino A, Sekulić A, Trifunovski A, Mako A, Bedada AG, Broglia A, Coppola A, Giani A, Grandi A, Iacomino A, Moro A, D’amico A, Malagnino A, Tang A, Doyle A, Alfieri A, Haynes A, Wilkins A, Baldwin A, Heriot A, Laird A, Lazarides A, O'connor A, Trulson A, Rokohl AC, Caziuc A, Triantafyllou A, Anesi A, Nikova A, Andrianakis A, Charalabopoulos A, Tsolakidis A, Chirca A, Arnaud AP, Narvaez-Rojas AR, Kavalakat A, Spina A, Recordare A, Annicchiarico A, Conti A, Mohammed AD, Kocataş A, Almhimid A, Arnaout A, Fahmy A, Mangi A, Modabber A, Ulas AB, Mohamedahmed AYY, Frontali A, Moynihan A, Yunus A, Ahmad A, Kent AJ, Khamees A, Ugwu AO, Turan A, Mohammed AAK, Navarro-Barrios A, Yebes A, De Sousa ÁFL, Moreno A, Sethi A, Dawson AC, Othman AAA, Kaur A, Wolde A, Antonelli A, Scifo A, Alhamad A, Davis A, Alderazi A, Harky A, Mohammed-Durosinlorun A, Seguya A, Okhakhu A, Chamakhi A, Sebai A, Souadka A, Asla A, Agrawal A, Persad A, Gupta A, Elgazar A, Kulkarni A, Coates A, Bellés AC, Hadzibegovic AD, Jotic A, Kowark A, Martins A, Pineda AM, Peral A, Gollarte AS, Senent-Boza A, Camarena AIA, Castaño-Leon AM, Bravo AMM, Moro AMG, Musina AM, Tapia-Herrero AM, Kothari A, Gupta A, Raja A, Aljaiuossi A, Taha A, Majbar AM, Prodromidou A, Kanatas A, Gupte A, Zakaria AD, Balla A, Barberis A, Bondurri A, Bottari A, Costantino A, Figus A, Lauretta A, Mingoli A, Romanzi A, Sagnotta A, Scacchi A, Picchetto A, Valadez AEC, Luzzi AP, Älgå A, Fontalis A, Hecker A, Demetriades AK, Serban AM, Văcărașu AB, Cokan A, Isaza-Restrepo A, Beamish A, Schache A, Stevenson A, Yiu A, Cockbain AJ, Litvin A, Abad-Motos A, Becerra A, Ramos ÁC, Chiaradia A, Dell A, Romano A, Pascale A, Marra AA, Dimas A, Kolias A, Cerovac A, Koneru A, Tidjane A, Agbeko AE, Bajaj A, Gosain A, Allan A, Carreras-Castañer A, D'amore A, Dare A, Maffioli A, Palepa A, Paspala A, Konney A, Gatta AND, Ezanno AC, Yiallourou A, Kinnair A, Rayner A, Scafa AK, Bowan AB, Veglia A, Russo A, Maniaci A, Castaldi A, Gil-Moreno A, Maffuz-Aziz A, Meola A, Nenna A, Ferrer AP, Bonilla AR, Ramos-De La Medina A, Infante AR, Santoro A, Laganà AS, Bateman A, Michael ALR, Abozid A, Seidu AS, Lowery A, Tantraworasin A, Rasheed A, Picciariello A, Isik A, Saif A, Anjum A, Ioannidis A, Abeldaño A, Hussain A, Nathan A, Bedzhanyan A, Perfecto A, De Virgilio A, Galvan A, Sablotzki A, Böttcher A, Pellacani A, Gatti A, Ibrahimli A, Menon A, Sahni A, Mwenda AS, Choudhry A, Jayawardane A, Gupta A, Ramasamy A, Mitul AR, Bawa A, Nugur A, Rammohan A, Sachdeva A, Mehraj A, Yildirim A, Alqaseer A, Radwan A, Sallam A, Syllaios A, Tampakis A, Alwael A, Samara A, Eroglu A, Rahman A, Ulkucu A, Zaránd A, Dulskas A, Tawiah A, Zani A, Vas A, Lukosiute-Urboniene A, Adamu A, Aujayeb A, Malik AA, İplikçi A, Mahmud A, Cil AP, Makanjuola A, Akwaisah A, Galandarova A, Saracoglu A, Regan A, Barlas AM, Alhassan BAB, Mostafa B, Hamida BB, Torun BC, Abdullah B, Balagobi B, Banky B, Singh B, Alegbeleye B, Yigit B, Hajjaj BN, Burgos-Blasco B, Seeliger B, Alayande B, Alhazmi B, Enodien B, Torre B, Pérez BG, Tamayo BV, De Andrés-Asenjo B, Quintana-Villamandos B, Girgin B, Barmayehvar B, Beisenov B, Creavin B, Dunne B, Marson B, Waterson B, Martin B, Zucker B, Wong BNX, Ozmen BB, Hammond B, Mbwele B, Núñez B, Dhondt B, Gafsi B, Mcleish B, Lieske B, Tailor B, La Pira B, Picardi B, Zampogna B, Casagranda B, Festa BM, Panda B, Kirmani B, Sulaiman B, Gurung B, Zacharia B, Bette B, Ayana B, Nikolovska B, Vilaró BC, De Vega Sánchez B, Hameed BZ, Diaconescu B, Kovacevic B, Bumber B, Sakakushev B, Tadic B, Malek B, Alrayes B, Thomas B, Gális B, Gallagher B, Knowles B, Cunningham B, Daley B, Mishra B, Ashford B, Pirozzi BM, Berselli B, Martinez-Leo B, Sensi B, Nardo B, Celik B, Giray B, Abud B, Almiqlash B, Pramesh CS, Taskiran C, De Campos Prado CA, Cipolla C, Kumar C, English C, Riccetti C, Vanni C, Brasset C, Downey C, Duffy C, Chwat C, Cutmore C, Sars C, Ratto C, Pacilio CA, De La Infiesta García C, Moreno CG, Magalhães C, Prada C, Zapata CS, Senni C, Flumignan CDQ, Martinez-Perez C, Duarte CL, Garcia CSR, Anderson C, Hing C, Cullinane C, Cina C, Zabkiewicz C, Sohrabi C, Guldogan CE, Ciubotaru C, Desai C, Raut C, Demetriou C, Handford C, Okpani C, Paranjape C, Koh C, Khatri C, Parmar C, Mok CW, Caricato C, Marafante C, Echieh CP, Tan CY, Ong CS, Conso C, Jardinez C, Konrads C, Warner C, Makwe CC, Henein C, Fleming C, Roland CL, Maurus C, Nitschke C, Mittermair C, Mallmann C, Andro C, Harmston C, Kuppler C, Lotz C, Nahm C, Rowe C, Ryalino C, Wallis C, Millward CP, Anthoulakis C, Apostolou C, Chouliaras C, Kalfountzos C, Kaselas C, Vosinakis C, Okereke C, Chean CS, Barlow C, Tatar C, Clancy C, Forde C, Sharpin C, Mccarthy C, Nestor C, Warden C, Ávila CC, Massaguer C, Fang CEH, Martins CP, Guerci C, Mauriello C, Holzmeister C, Miller C, Weber C, Wiesinger CG, Kenington C, Noel C, Sue-Chue-Lam C, Adumah C, Neary C, Sen C, Fitzgerald C, Ezeme C, Nastos C, Mesina C, Bombardini C, Torregrosa C, Valdespino CP, Don CP, Wickramasinghe D, Milanesi D, Armijos D, Asiimwe D, Beswick D, Clerc D, Cox D, Doherty D, Martínez DF, Lechuga DG, Gero D, Gil-Sala D, Lindegger D, Reim D, Shaerf D, Shmukler D, Branzan D, Filipescu D, Rega D, Bernardi D, Bissacco D, Fusario D, Morezzi D, Sabella D, Zimak DM, Vinci D, Sale D, Khan DZ, Thereska D, Andreotti D, Tartaglia D, Abdulai DR, Mukherjee D, Verdi D, Idowu D, John D, Johnson D, Moro-Valdezate D, Naumann D, Omar D, Proud D, Roberts D, Guzmán DS, Watson D, Bergkvist DJ, Lumenta DB, Ferrari D, Rizzo D, Degarege D, Castillo DFC, Douglas D, Wright D, Nanjiani D, Bratus D, Altun D, Sievers D, Vaysburg D, Katechia D, Ghosh D, Azize DA, Rodrigues D, Pachajoa DAP, Hayne D, Mutter D, Raimondo D, Eskinazi D, Sasia D, Corallino D, Muduly D, Grewal D, Hadzhiev D, Peristeri D, Pournaras D, Raptis DA, Angelou D, Haidopoulos D, Magouliotis D, Moris D, Schizas D, Symeonidis D, Tsironis D, Korkolis D, Tatsis D, Thekkinkattil D, Bulian DR, Pandey D, Vatansever D, Parker D, Wiedemann D, Borselle D, Pedini D, Schweitzer D, Venskutonis D, Otokwala J, Adamu KM, Pk P, Garod M, Ellafi AAD, Zivkovic D, Jelovac D, Wijeysundera D, Mcpherson D, Ryan É, Ugwu E, Baidoo EI, Shaddad E, Memişoğlu E, Naranjo EPL, Brodkin E, Segalini E, Viglietta E, Hendriks E, Bonci EA, Sá-Marta E, Ortega EN, Gomez EGL, Joviliano EE, Clune E, Horwell E, Mains E, Vasarhelyi E, Caruana EJ, Nevins EJ, Yenli EMTA, Baili E, Lostoridis E, Morgan E, Shiban E, Latif E, Tampaki EC, Ezenwa E, Irune E, Borg E, Eisa E, Gialamas E, Parvez E, Theophilidou E, Toma EA, Arnaoutoglou E, Samadov E, Kantor E, Ulman EA, Colak E, Cassinotti E, Bannone E, Sarjanoja E, Yates E, Vincent E, Lun EWY, Cerovac E, Dif ES, Alkhalifa E, Daketsey E, Fayad EA, Sheikh E, Pontecorvi E, Cammarata E, La Corte E, Rausa E, Odai ED, Guasch E, Cano-Trigueros E, Uldry E, Ros EP, Matthews E, Donmez EE, Giorgakis E, Kapetanakis E, Stamatakis E, Bua E, Schneck E, Nachelleh EA, Ofori EO, Akin E, Gönüllü E, Kirkan EF, Çelik E, Wong E, Capozzi E, Pinotti E, Colás-Ruiz E, González E, Fekaj E, Ohazurike E, Kebede E, Erginöz E, Duran EES, Scott E, Aytac E, Albanese E, Castro EJ, Albayadi E, Kriem E, Siddig E, Otify E, El Tayeb EEABH, Hong EH, Saguil E, Belzile E, Tuyishime E, Panieri E, Martínez EG, Myriokefalitaki E, Wong EG, Samara E, Agbeno EK, Drozdov E, Tokidis E, Shah FA, Barra F, Carbone F, Ferreli F, Marino F, Martinelli F, D'acapito F, Masciello F, Bàmbina F, Issa F, Salameh FT, Kethy F, Mahmood F, Gareb F, Idrees F, Karimian F, Ashraf F, Haji F, Inayat F, Begum F, Nabil F, Rosa F, Haider F, Parray F, Calculli F, Ferracci F, Saraceno F, Coppola F, Coccolini F, Fusini F, Migliorelli F, Pecoraro F, Alconchel F, Coimbra FJF, Trivik-Barrientos F, Naegele F, Almarshad F, Agresta F, Fleming F, Mendoza-Moreno F, Brzeszczyński F, Carannante F, Wu F, Aljanadi F, Hayati F, Campo F, Sorbi F, Milana F, Takeda FR, Shekleton F, Gessler F, Recker F, Grama F, Cherbanyk F, Faponle F, Angelis F, Calabretto F, Gaino F, Toia F, Bianco F, Bussu F, Cammarata F, Castagnini F, Colombo F, Ferrara F, Fleres F, Guerrera F, Litta F, Mongelli F, Pata F, Roscio F, Mulita F, Ardura F, Tejero-Pintor FJ, Calvo FJR, Escobedo FJB, Camacho FJB, Odicino F, Schmitt F, Bloemers F, Hölzle F, Gyamfi FE, Messner F, Koh F, Cáceres F, Smolle-Juettner FM, Herman F, Ayeni F, Djedovic G, De Oliveira GP, Rodrigues G, Wagner G, Bellio G, Giarratano G, Capolupo GT, Budd G, Marom G, Poillucci G, Thiruchandran G, Nicholson G, Groot G, Hoey G, Bass GA, Sachdev G, Agarwal G, Aggarwal G, Cormio G, Mazzarella G, Perrone G, Osterhoff G, Singer G, Dejeu G, Fowler G, Garas G, Gradinariu G, Theodoropoulos G, Tzimas G, Babis G, Wong GKC, Cross GWV, Micha G, Chrysovitsiotis G, Koukoulis G, Peros G, Tsoulfas G, Kapetanios G, Karagiannidis G, Verras GI, Ekwen G, Perrotta G, Petruzzi G, Bertelli G, Calini G, Fiacchini G, Pirola GM, Dolci G, Mendiola G, Baiocchi GL, Palini GM, Prucher GM, D'andrea G, Maggiore G, Cassese G, Franceschini G, Pellino G, Saponaro G, Pattacini GC, Pantuso G, Iannella G, Bonsaana GB, Lever G, Brachini G, Giraudo G, Lisi G, Russo GI, Aprea G, Pascale G, Tomasicchio G, Sandri GBL, Armatura G, Turri G, Zaccaria G, Barugola G, Lantone G, Gasparini G, Iacob G, Sozzi G, Zancana G, Mercante G, Bianco G, Brisinda G, Consorti G, Currò G, Giannaccare G, Palomba G, Pascarella G, Rotunno G, Spriano G, Vizzielli G, Cucinella G, Sica G, Campisi G, Baiocchi G, Guerra GR, Pacheco GMF, Atis G, Augustin G, Šantak G, Chauhan GS, Branagan G, Harris G, Stewart GD, Padmore G, Kocher GJ, Di Franco G, De Jesus Labrador Hernandez G, Christodoulidis G, Neal-Smith G, Yim G, Piozzi GN, Claret G, Yanowsky-Reyes G, Dhaity GD, Cakmak GK, Mohamed G, Kucuk GO, Ancans G, Banipal GS, De Bacco Marangon G, Laporte G, Martinez-Mier G, Recinos G, V GMM, Benshetrit G, Vijgen G, Pickett G, Rodriguez HA, Shiwani H, Derilo H, Awad H, El Assaad H, Raji HO, Hardgrave H, Karakullukcu HK, Abdussalam HO, Mustafa H, Parwaiz H, Khan H, Arbab H, Naga H, Salem H, Ulgur HS, Perez-Chrzanowska H, Greenlee H, Javanmard-Emamghissi H, Lederhuber H, Osman H, Adamou H, Majid HJ, Van Goor H, Spiers HVM, Manesh HF, Mushtaq H, Aljaaly H, Hasan HB, Ahmed HTA, Martinez-Said H, Aguado HJ, Consani H, Chaplin H, Mohan H, Van Vliet H, Lohse HAS, Shah H, Claireaux H, Lule H, Juara H, Abozied H, Bayo HL, Alibrahim H, Kroon HM, Ulman H, Khan H, Yonekura H, Abou-Taleb H, Wong HYF, Carpenter H, Majd HS, Zenha H, Mayer HF, Elghadban H, Abdou H, Elfeki H, Yusefi H, Gomez-Fernandez H, Horsfall HL, Meleiro H, Sungurtekin H, Junior HFL, Moloo H, Bayhan H, Şevi̇k H, Embarek H, Hamid HKS, Pradeep IHDS, Donkin I, Ateca IV, Jafarov I, Salisu I, Abdalaal I, Garzali IU, Sall I, Adebara I, Aghadi I, Ugwu I, Zapardiel I, Reis I, Nwafor I, Fakhradiyev I, Surya IU, Robo I, Njokanma I, Iannone I, Khan I, Correia I, Königsrainer I, Seiwerth I, Linero IB, Kadiri I, Florian IA, Tzima I, Akrida I, Baloyiannis I, Gerogiannis I, Katsaros I, Tsakiridis I, Valioulis I, Negoi I, Yadev I, De Haro Jorge I, Vázquez IO, Dajti I, Russo IS, Afzal I, Wasserman I, Chukwu I, Gracia I, Oliver IM, Hughes I, Mondi I, Ncogoza I, Bsisu I, Rashid I, Balasubramanian I, Omar I, Dominguez-Rosado I, Smati I, Vokshi I, Al-Badawi IA, Saleh IA, Pilkington I, Kirac I, Trostchansky I, Gawron IM, Trebol J, Martellucci J, Andreuccetti J, Abou-Khalil J, Shah J, Manickavasagam J, De Alarcón JR, Mihanovic J, O'riordan J, Archer J, Ashcroft J, Blair J, Hamill J, Munthali J, Park J, Parry J, Ryan J, Tomlinson J, Wheeler J, Wilkins J, Balogun JA, Hodgetts JM, Vatish J, Žatecký J, Dziakova J, Martin J, Beatty JW, Stijns J, Faiz J, Ripollés-Melchor J, Mata J, Vásquez JAG, Mitra JK, Tuech JJ, Mvukiyehe JP, Fallah JM, Díaz JT, Vishnoi JR, Van Den Eynde J, Rickard J, Rolinger J, Kaplowitz J, Meyer J, Reid J, Rossaak J, Smelt J, Thomas JJ, Reyes JAS, Davies J, Luc J, Alonso JAM, Hajiioannou J, Querney J, Van Acker J, Pu JJ, Cama J, Simoes J, Cozens J, Barbosa-Breda J, Ribeiro J, De Haro J, Nigh J, Bowen J, Pollok JM, Strotmann JJ, Doerner J, Edwards J, Green J, Massoud J, Mcgrath J, Squiers J, Street J, Windsor J, Santoshi JA, Meara JG, Abebrese JT, Reilly JJ, Zabaleta J, Phillips J, Herron J, Horsnell J, Dawson J, Sheen J, Kauppila JH, Konsten J, Raurich-Leandro J, Romera JS, Nuñez J, Gass JM, Blanco J, Calvache JA, Iturralde JLF, D’addino JL, Hermosa JMG, Guillen JRO, Beristain-Hernandez JL, Sole-Sedeno JM, Vives JMM, Attwood J, Furey J, Hadaya J, Mckay J, Meilak J, Natale J, Shalhoub J, Jung J, Arthur J, Kealey J, Wright J, Moreau J, Miskovic J, Juloski J, Bauset JCC, Segura-Sampedro JJ, Cisneros JRT, Gomez-Rosado JC, Arneja J, Heider J, Fernández JD, Plata-Bello J, Villanueva J, Olaogun J, Hing JX, Košir JA, Daruwalla J, Yeung J, Wormald J, Seyi-Olajide J, Rani J, Wong KY, Hristova K, Kajal K, Algarni K, Theivendran K, Futaba K, Elsayem K, Kapur K, Bailey K, El-Boghdadly K, Ataya K, Lacorbiniere K, Shah K, Tellez KSM, Szyluk K, Rangasamy K, Iyengar K, Szabómihályová K, Atkinson K, Camargo-Parra K, Galliard K, Dickson K, Singh K, Qader K, Hasan K, Spellar K, Feeney K, Ajenifuja K, Oh KE, Okunade K, Adanu K, Bateman K, Saracoglu K, Ho KW, Enwerem K, Mishra K, Verhoeff K, Bensoltane K, Larabi K, Hamdan KH, Nadi K, Fozo K, Abdelwahab K, Al-Sayaghi K, Dajani K, Algahtany K, Abdel-Galil K, Ahmed K, Bajunaid K, Bhatti K, Sofi K, Abdulsalam K, Tamoos K, Dzhumabaev K, Samo KA, Purich K, Madhvani K, Qin KR, Underwood K, Senanayake KJ, Augestad KM, Sigamoney K, Apostolou K, Bouchagier K, Bouliaris K, Bramis K, Gousias K, Lasithiotakis K, Paraskevopoulos K, Perivoliotis K, Roditis K, Stamatis K, Stroumpoulis K, Paraskevas KI, Govindarajan KK, Šimko K, Olson KA, Khobragade K, Seah KM, Kishore K, Ayad K, Papavasiliou K, Angelou K, Paniagua LC, Czako L, Ching LVK, Rai L, Gupta L, Ismail L, Mbodi L, Dasanayake L, Schröder L, Baiyewu LA, Fortuna L, Fernandez LG, Vivancos LG, Jack L, Keçi L, Lavalle L, Leonard L, Shelmerdine L, Vaassen L, Hasan L, Lazarou L, Tzelves L, Matos L, Siragusa L, Licari L, Lima LS, Solaini L, Lichman L, Moral LT, Cabeza L, Kaplan L, Valeanu L, Kaman L, Karout L, Pieteris L, Chan L, Grüßer L, Zamora L, Catarzi L, Rampersad L, Anyanwu LJ, Cheung LK, Rodríguez LV, Andreani L, Cobianchi L, Petagna L, Howse L, Gonzalez LE, Bains L, Vohra L, Ansaloni L, Bertolaccini L, Ferrario L, Orecchia L, Tirloni L, Zanin L, Morelli L, Scaravilli L, Locatello LG, García LD, Vida L, Carbone L, Heindl LM, Bonavina L, Conti L, Marano L, Verre L, Conte LE, Boccalatte L, Tellez LGS, Loureiro L, Sánchez-Guillén L, Tallon-Aguilar L, Nakano L, Alvarez-Lozada LA, Gonzalez LAS, Flórez LJG, Capitan-Morales LC, Kowalski LP, Widmer LW, Harper L, Render L, Wheldon L, Abdur-Rahman L, Doğan L, Prusty L, Katsiaras L, Gourbault L, Siddiqui MT, Saleh M, Karthigeyan M, Rodriguez M, Chowdhury M, Nagappa M, Sultania M, Bashir M, Alam M, Elshahawy MAM, Elfiky M, Loubani M, Marei M, Mewafy M, Alali M, Nassar MA, Alobied M, Bilfaqirah M, Ahmad M, Rius M, Manangi M, Dornseifer MD, Tripathi M, S M, Sokolov M, Pigeolet M, Alonso MD, Losada M, Carretero MM, Tousidonis M, Cotovio MD, Wijeyaratne M, Boira MA, Franza M, Albdour M, Alkhatieb M, Déserts MDD, Niewiera M, Vallve-Bernal M, Kavanagh MM, Migliore M, Calabrò M, Martino MD, Reicher M, Baia M, Caricato M, Clementi M, De Zuanni M, Fiore M, Giacometti M, Inama M, Maestri M, Materazzo M, Sparavigna M, Pascale MM, Nemeth M, Serra M, Fahim MMF, Soucheiron MC, Papadoliopoulou M, Wittmann M, Sotiropoulou M, García-Conde M, Ranucci MC, Amo MDAD, Boedo MJM, Velázquez MJM, Pissaridou MK, Petersen ML, Sacras ML, Modolo MM, Caubet MM, Di Nuzzo MM, Ntalouka MP, Menna MP, Aguilera-Arevalo ML, Rela M, Capuano M, Hollyman M, Olivos M, Sacdalan MD, Raphael MC, Takkenberg M, Bortul M, Cabrera M, Castaño M, D'oria M, Giuffrida M, Laborde MM, Rodriguez-Lopez M, Trejo-Avila M, Papa MV, Ghobrial M, Kryzauskas M, Anwer M, Cheetham M, Davies M, Higgins M, Siboe M, Tarle M, Velten M, Wurm M, Süleyman M, Bauer M, O’dwyer M, Caretto M, De La Rosa-Estadella M, Fragoso M, Serra ML, Merayo M, Golet MR, Martínez-Sánchez MI, Domingo MMA, Gosselink M, Batstone M, Reichert M, Salö M, Soljic M, Zambon M, Angeles MA, Abdulkhaleq M, Abdelkarim M, Alsefri M, Iwasaki M, Shiota M, Veroux M, Molina-Corbacho M, Frasson M, Serenari M, De Pastena M, Desio M, Risaliti M, Rottoli M, Bence M, Chan M, Watson M, Wiles M, Boisson M, Berselli M, Capobianco M, Di Bartolomeo M, Fehervari M, Pacilli M, Romano M, Zizzo M, Domanin M, Montuori M, Podda M, Zago M, Dzogbefia M, Frountzas M, Thaw MH, Al-Juaifari M, Gharat M, Mohamed M, Hannan MJ, Venketeswaran M, Chisthi M, Dessalegn M, Kaplan M, Çakıcı MÇ, Ulutaş ME, Hassan M, Elsadek M, Mengesha MG, Gómez ME, Elbadawy MA, Pitcher M, Tanal M, Tokocin M, Ergenç M, Çelik MN, Bareka M, Pekcici MR, Cappuccio M, Dasa M, Dewan M, El Boghdady M, Ezeanochie M, Greenhalgh M, Jenkinson M, Kelly M, Spartalis M, Zyskowski M, Racine M, De Cillia M, Chu MJJ, Mallmann MR, Zhu MZL, Klimovskij M, Vailas M, Kisielewski M, Adamina M, Campanelli M, Carvello M, Ammendola M, Manigrasso M, Scopelliti M, White M, Collins ML, Chevallay M, Borges MF, Mayo-Yáñez M, Melo MR, Ruiz-Marín M, Eiras MAF, Cunha MF, Pertea M, Slavchev M, Davidescu M, Prieto M, Agapov M, Gahwagi M, Prats MC, Rudic M, Verbic MS, Kostusiak M, Stoleriu MG, Lucas MA, Barone M, Ahmad M, Alemu MAA, Fatima M, Ida M, Sahu M, Muhaisen M, Salem M, Emara MM, Oludara M, Sotudeh M, Kassab MB, Abdelkhalek M, Alsori M, Anwar M, El-Kassas M, Elbahnasawy M, Eldabaa M, Rabie M, Hassanin MA, Thaha MA, Ali MSM, Alhamid M, Almoshantaf MB, Keramati MR, Bafaquh M, Abuzaid M, Al-Shehari M, Alharthi M, Alkahlan M, Alwash M, Alyousef M, Amir M, Basendowah M, Deputy M, Jibreel M, Alam MS, Alsharif M, Issahalq MD, Omer MEA, Abubakar MK, Draman MR, Elnour MAE, Eltayeb M, Castillo MN, Jawad M, Raut M, Ghalleb M, Katsura M, Lebe M, Abbas M, Abdelrahman M, Shalaby M, Farhan-Alanie M, Farooq M, Musadaq M, Arshad M, Anjum MA, Usman M, Chaudhary MA, Raza MA, Karim MFSA, Chaudhary MH, Janjua MH, Khokhar MI, Malik MIK, Pirzada MT, Younis MU, Elhadi M, Suer MS, Ergenç M, Binnawara M, Emmanuel M, Abbasi M, Naimzada MD, Kulimbet M, Kusunoki M, Eugene M, Chauhan M, Shokor MA, Aljiffry M, Kalın M, Kurawa M, Dincer MB, Tolani MA, Soytas M, Yakubu M, Usman MI, Aremu M, Paranyak M, Talat N, Kausar N, Dudi-Venkata N, Bazzi N, Hasan NB, Van Wyk NN, Shaban N, Almgla N, Kandevani NY, Alzerwi N, Alvarez N, Motas N, Rincón NAR, Blencowe N, Simon N, Aghtarafi N, Ghuman NK, Sharma N, Wijekoon N, Kumar N, Hassan N, Onyemaechi N, Prijović N, Özçay N, Goel N, Segaren N, Sharma N, Kalyva N, Palacios NM, Alonso NFP, Onyeagwara N, Petrucciani N, Daddi N, Lightfoot N, Power N, Segaren N, Starr N, Dreger NM, Cillara N, Colucci N, Eardley N, Tartaglia N, Zanini N, Bacalbasa N, Campuzano N, Mouawad N, Federico NSP, Tamini N, Mariani NM, Beasley N, Adu-Aryee NA, Burlov N, Dimitrokallis N, Gouvas N, Machairas N, Memos N, Thomakos N, Tsakiridis N, Schizas N, Börner N, Theochari N, Al-Saadi N, Glass N, Horesh N, R NE, Gahlot N, Ismail N, Aljirdabi N, Maria NUH, Trabulsi N, Akeel N, Borges N, Moda N, Redondo NV, Nyarko OO, Ginghina O, Enciu O, Okere O, Ekwunife OH, Quadri O, Ogundoyin O, Tucker O, Mateo-Sierra O, Azzis O, Ojewuyi O, Habeeb O, Idowu O, Elebute O, Agboola O, Ladipo-Ajayi O, Oyinloye O, Adebola O, Ekor O, Ogundoyin O, Salamanca O, Vergara-Fernandez O, Wafi O, Aladawi O, Bahassan OM, Tammo Ö, Ozkan OF, Williams OM, Salami O, Akinajo O, Sakhov O, Gallo O, Sole OM, Milella O, Alser O, Bettar OA, Alomar O, Osman OS, Aisuodionoe-Shadrach O, Basnayake O, Bozbiyik O, Hodges O, Ojo O, Yanık Ö, Mutlu ÖPZ, Kazan O, Calavia P, García PR, Urriza PV, Lopez PR, Christidis P, Dorovinis P, Kokoropoulos P, Mourmouris P, Papatheodorou P, Garg PK, Patel P, Vassiliu P, Campennì P, De Nardi P, Bernante P, Ubiali P, Baroffio P, Pizzini P, Sapienza P, Myrelid P, Chatzikomnitsa P, Tsiantoula P, Gada P, Avella P, Cianci P, Romero P, Méndez PS, Pazmiño PAF, Coughlin P, Kirchweger P, Pessaux P, Maguire PJ, Petrone P, Cullis P, Köglberger P, Marriott P, Nankivell P, Santos-Costa P, Martins PN, Panahi P, Botelho P, Teixeira P, Escobar P, Vázquez PJG, Gribnev P, Nolte P, Agbonrofo P, Bobak P, Choong P, Elbe P, Hutchinson P, Labib P, Paal P, Pockney P, Reemst P, Szatmary P, Vaughan-Shaw PG, Alexander P, Pucher P, Stather P, Foessleitner P, Winnand P, Zehnder P, Kruse P, Matos PAW, Lapolla P, Cicerchia PM, Solli P, Di Lascio P, Zarif P, Champagne PO, Anoldo P, Bertoglio P, Fransvea P, Familiari P, Lombardi PM, Stogowski PT, Bruzzaniti P, Tripathi P, D'sa P, Salunke P, Shah PA, Punjabi PPP, Christodoulou P, Hamdan Q, Tawalbeh R, Gadelkareem R, Awad R, Callcut R, Clegg R, Choron R, Payne R, Gefen R, Costea R, Drasovean R, Mirica RM, Ravindra R, Fajardo RT, Nunes RL, Aspide R, Lombardi R, Vidya R, Elboraei R, Saaid R, Ghodke R, Gupta R, Sharma RD, Lunevicius R, Kalayarasan R, Mohan R, Singh R, Sivaprakasam R, Seenivasagam RK, Rajendram R, Radulescu RB, Goicea R, Seshadri RA, Sarı R, Nataraja R, Aslam R, Abdelemam R, Shrestha R, Bharathan R, Pellini R, Guevara R, Agarwal R, Vissapragada R, Alharmi RA, Sayyed R, Browning R, Critchley R, Mallick R, Alarabi R, Beron RI, Függer R, Othman R, Saad R, Amores RR, Colombari RC, Radivojević RC, Patrone R, Novysedlák R, Palacios Huatuco RM, Baertschiger R, Liang R, Luckwell R, Escrevente R, Rezende RF, Cruz RP, Lenzi R, Rosati R, Donovan R, Egan R, Morris R, Page R, Seglenieks R, Unsworth R, Wilkin R, Skipworth RJ, Davies RJ, Bezirci R, Talwar R, Azami R, Bohmer R, Crichton R, Fruscio R, Hooker R, Jach R, Parker R, Pillerstorff R, Sinnerton R, Stabler R, O'connell RM, Ragozzino R, Tutino R, Angelico R, Cammarata R, Colasanti R, Macchiavello R, Peltrini R, Pirrello R, Vaschetti R, Pires RE, Papalia R, Arrangoiz R, Hompes R, Mittal R, Salah R, Pinto R, Flumignan R, Callan R, Cuthbert R, Dennis R, Scaramuzzo R, Macías RM, Sánchez R, Ogu R, Ramely R, Sgarzani R, Ramli R, Hillier R, Thumbadoo R, Ooi R, Abdus-Salam R, Masri R, Hodgson R, Mathew R, Wade R, D'archi S, Khan S, Ngaserin S, Kale S, Hassan S, Merghani S, Benamar S, Muhammad S, Badran S, Elsahli S, Heta S, Hammouche S, Baeesa S, Paiella S, Eldeen STEHT, Arkani S, Mittal S, Hirji S, Tebha S, Emile S, Dbouk S, Bandyopadhyay SK, Muhammad S, Olori S, Asirifi SA, Hailu S, Ling S, Newman S, Ross S, Wanjara S, Kumar S, Seneviratne S, Tamburello S, Suarez SB, Ingallinella S, Irshaidat S, Konswa S, Mambrilla S, Nasser S, Parini S, Pitoni S, Ornaghi S, Rodrigues SC, Abdelmohsen S, Aitken S, Tian S, Badiani S, Ahmad S, Swed S, Muthu S, Lakpriya S, Alzahrani S, Mikalauskas S, Lasrado S, Satoskar S, Bawa S, Altiner S, Garcia S, Stevens S, Demir S, Ken-Amoah S, Tranca S, Ziemann S, Awad S, Atici SD, Subramaniam S, Erel S, Jiang S, Efetov S, Efremov S, Katorkin S, Valladares SC, Contreras SM, Meriç S, Zenger S, Safi S, Leventoğlu S, Elsalhawy S, Shaikh S, Sheik S, Islam S, Shamim S, Waqar SH, Ahmad S, Farid S, Seraj SS, Sundarraju S, Karandikar S, Sambhwani S, Chopra S, Chowdhury S, Laura S, Ahmed S, Wason S, Tan SJH, Fraser S, Williams S, Ghozy S, Abdelmawgoud S, Shehata S, Sharma S, Ahmed S, Al-Touny SA, Ramzanali S, Nah SA, Jansen S, Rajan S, Dindyal S, Amin S, Ahmad S, Shoukrie SIM, Karar S, Patkar S, Abdulsalam S, Lin S, Hegde S, Fiorelli S, Quaresima S, Redondo SV, Palmisano S, Ruggiero S, Balogun S, Cais S, Cole S, Federer S, Le Roux S, Ippoliti S, Meneghini S, Viola S, Manfredelli S, Novello S, Gananadha S, Mesli SN, Kale S, Tani SI, Malik S, Anastasiadou S, Boligo S, Esposito S, Valanci S, Xenaki S, Pejkova S, Bandyopadhyay S, Trungu S, Basu S, Alkhatib S, Pérez-Bertólez S, Flores SL, Donoghue S, Lunca S, Orsoo S, Potamianos S, Devarakonda S, Suresh S, Croghan SM, Turi S, Capella S, Lucchini S, Magnone S, Salizzoni S, Scabini S, Scaringi S, Cioffi SPB, Seyfried S, Degener S, Potten S, Taha-Mehlitz S, Ali S, Angamuthu S, Mcaleer S, Knight SR, White S, Mantziari S, Kykalos S, Goh SK, Chowdhury SP, Ibrahim S, Elzwai S, Bansal S, Tripathy S, Amrayev S, Anwar SL, Banerjee S, Thakar S, Saeed S, Venkatappa SK, Das S, Techapongsatorn S, Dube SK, Lee S, González-Suárez S, Henriques S, Konjevoda S, Gisbertz S, Bravo SL, Mannan S, Bukhari SI, Zafar SN, Batista S, Chin SL, Arif T, Lawal TA, Aktokmakyan TV, Osborn T, Szakmany T, Sztipits T, Triantafyllou T, Valadez TAC, Singh T, Khaliq T, Patel T, Fadalla T, Jichi T, Sammour T, Al-Shaiji T, Naggs T, Barišić T, Nikolouzakis T, Bisgin T, Perra T, Uprak TK, Dagklis T, Liakakos T, Sidiropoulos T, Adjeso TJK, Dölker T, Oung T, Aherne T, Diehl T, Pinkney T, Raymond T, Rhomberg T, Schmitz-Rixen T, Madhuri TK, Lohmann TK, Yeoh T, Zaimis T, Bright T, Vilz TO, Glowka TR, Board T, Hardcastle T, Cohnert T, Mahečić TT, William TG, Klatte T, Abbott T, Watcyn-Jones T, Mendes T, Kulis T, Sečan T, Campagnaro T, Frisoni T, Simoncini T, Violante T, Safranovs TJ, Risteski T, Pang T, Akinyemi T, Yotsov T, Laeke T, Kochiyama T, Sholadoye TT, Alekberli T, Ezomike U, Giustizieri U, Grossi U, Köksoy ÜC, Bork U, Kisser U, Ronellenfitsch U, Saeed U, Bracale U, Jayarajah U, Rauf UHA, Bumbasirevic U, Ferrer UMJ, Ahmed U, Bello UM, Jogiat U, Sadia U, Galandarov V, Narayanan V, Calu V, Bianchi V, Ciniero V, Tonini V, Silvestri V, Vijay V, Dewan V, Lohsiriwat V, Thuduvage V, Mousafeiris V, Dragisic V, Sasireka V, Santric V, Kusuma VRM, Kolli VS, Alonso V, De Simone V, Picotti V, Martínez VM, Panduro-Correa V, Kakotkin V, Angulo VP, Turrado-Rodriguez V, Krishnamoorthy V, Ban VS, Shah V, Maiola V, Giordano V, La Vaccara V, Lizzi V, Papagni V, Schiavone V, Satchithanantham V, Garcia-Virto V, Jimenez V, Kumar V, Shelat V, Bhat V, Sodhai V, Graziadei V, Kutuzov V, Stoyanov V, Oktseloglou V, Flis V, Elhassan WAF, Yang W, Soon WC, Tashkandi W, Al-Khyatt W, Mabood W, Bijou W, Wijenayake W, D W, Krawczyk W, Atkins W, Bolton W, White W, Ceelen W, Vagena X, Gozal Y, Baba YI, Subramani Y, Jansen Y, Mittal Y, Kara Y, Zwain Y, Noureldin Y, Alawneh Y, Aydin Y, Lam YH, Tang Y, Lim Y, Dean Y, Tanas Y, Su YX, Fujimoto Y, Altinel Y, Frolova Y, Oshodi Y, Fadel ZT, Zahid Z, Elahi Z, Djama Z, Zaheen Z, Jawad Z, Demetrashvili Z, Gebremeskel Z, Gudisa Z, Alyami Z, Garoufalia Z, Li Z, Zimak Z, Radin Z, Balogh ZJ. Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries. Br J Surg 2023; 110:804-817. [PMID: 37079880 PMCID: PMC10364528 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. METHODS This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low-middle-income countries. RESULTS In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of 'single-use' consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low-middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high- and low-middle-income countries.
Collapse
|
10
|
Pandraklakis A, Haidopoulos D, Lappas T, Stamatakis E, Oikonomou MD, Valsamidis D, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Obese Gynecological Oncology Patients: A Single-Center Experience. Cureus 2023; 15:e40453. [PMID: 37456369 PMCID: PMC10349384 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to present our experience and evaluate the safety and outcomes of the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in obese patients who underwent surgery for suspected or confirmed gynecological malignancies. Method From January 2020 to September 2021, 217 patients underwent laparotomy for a confirmed or suspected gynecological malignancy following a 19-element ERAS pathway. The patients were divided into two groups: obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, n = 104) and non-obese (BMI < 30, n = 113). Both groups were treated with a 19-element ERAS protocol. Results After dividing the 217 patients into two groups, significantly more comorbidities were observed in the obese group (diabetes mellitus: 23% vs. 8%, p = 0.004; ASA score grade 3: 25.0% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001), as well as higher rates of endometrial cancer (51.9% vs. 17.7%, p < 0.001) compared to the non-obese group. The overall ERAS compliance rates when matched element by element were similar. Postoperatively, complication rates of all grades were significantly higher in the obese group (46.1% vs. 27.4%, p < 0.001) without differences in the length of stay, readmission, and reoperation rates. Conclusion In this retrospective study, we showed that obese gynecological oncology patients can be safely managed with ERAS protocols perioperatively while potentially minimizing the adverse outcomes in these otherwise high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasios Pandraklakis
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, GRC
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, GRC
| | - Theodoros Lappas
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, GRC
| | | | - Maria D Oikonomou
- The Fertility Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR
| | | | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, GRC
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, GRC
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pergialiotis V, Zachariou E, Vlachos DE, Vlachos A, Goula K, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. Tumor free distance from serosa and survival rates of endometrial cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 286:16-22. [PMID: 37167809 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Myometrial invasion and its extent have been directly associated with the risk of relapse as well as the overall survival of endometrial cancer patients. Tumor free distance from the serosal surface of the uterine wall has been investigated the last years by several studies, however, to date, its importance remains unknown. The present meta-analysis is based on a systematic search of the Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases and has been designed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Nine studies were included in the present systematic review that recruited pathology slides from 1,598 endometrial cancer patients and their meta-analysis indicated that TFD was significantly associated with the progression free survival of patients with endometrial cancer (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.65). The disease specific survival was not affected by the TFD (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09, 1.01). Sensitivity analyses revealed, however, that both the progression free and overall survival rates were associated with TFD. Significant discrepancies were observed in terms of histological subtypes and stage of the disease among included patients, hence, the actual importance of TFD in specific subgroups remains unknown. Future studies must evaluate the importance of this pathology marker particularly in patients with endometrioid subtypes and early-stage disease, as it is believed that in this group its importance will be more predictive as it will not be skewed by the presence of more important factors such as more aggressive histology and advanced stage disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
| | - Eleftherios Zachariou
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Efthymios Vlachos
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Vlachos
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | | | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1(st) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pergialiotis V, Papalios T, Haidopoulos D, Papapanagiotou A, Vlachos A, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Pre-Operative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Post-Operative Infectious Morbidity in Gynecologic Oncology Patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2023; 24:390-396. [PMID: 37040268 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2022.381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been described as a predictor of progression-free and overall survival, and in the field of peri-operative care it seems to be a factor that can help discriminate patients at risk of developing post-operative complications. In the present study we sought to determine whether NLR is useful as a biomarker in predictive models that aim to identify patients with gynecologic cancer undergoing surgery at risk of developing post-operative infectious morbidity. Patients and Methods: We designed a prospective cohort study that enrolled 208 patients with gynecologic cancer. Post-operative infectious morbidity was evaluated based on a 30-day follow-up interval from the procedure. Results: Forty-three patients (20.5%) developed post-operative infectious morbidity. Using an optimal cutoff value of 1.7 for the pre-operative NLR we observed that the sensitivity of the biomarker was 76.7% and the specificity 73.3% with a produced area under the curve of 0.760 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.680-0.839). Univariable logistic regression indicated that NLR is a predictor of post-operative morbidity. Cox regression analysis revealed that NLR was the only factor that was associated with the timing of infectious morbidity (hazard ratio [HR], 1.339; 95% CI, 1.180-1.519; p < 0.001). Using random forest analysis and decision trees we achieved a diagnostic accuracy of the predictive model that exceeded 90%. Conclusions: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be a factor that could potentially help evaluate the risk of post-operative morbidity in patients with gynecologic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Theodoros Papalios
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Angeliki Papapanagiotou
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrial University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Vlachos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, "Alexandra" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fotopoulou C, Haidopoulos D, Trappe RU. Peri-operative ovarian cancer guidelines: major intra-operative and post-operative bleeding and thromboembolic events. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:1621-1622. [PMID: 36191955 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ralf Ulrich Trappe
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pergialiotis V, Haidopoulos D, Christodoulou T, Rodolakis I, Prokopakis I, Liontos M, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Factors That Affect Survival Outcomes in Patients with Endometrial Clear Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11236931. [PMID: 36498506 PMCID: PMC9737404 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is a rare aggressive histologic subtype of endometrial cancer with a high relapse rate. In the present study, we sought to evaluate the prognostic factors of disease relapse and overall survival. Methods: We conducted retrospective cohort studies that included endometrial CCC patients treated at our institution. Predictive variables of survival outcomes were evaluated considering factors that determine the survival of patients with endometrioid carcinoma. Results: Fifty-five patients with a median age of 68 years and a median follow-up period of 31 months were included in the present study. Recurrence-free and overall survival rates did not differ among patients with early-stage and advanced-stage disease (RFS HR 1.51 (95% CI 0.63, 3.61), OS HR 1.36 (0.56, 3.31)). Patients with upper abdominal metastases had significantly shorter progression-free and overall survival intervals (log-rank < 0.001). The Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon analysis indicated worse survival rates for patients with advanced disease (p = 0.040); however, the log-rank test that gave equal weight to all time points did not reveal significant differences (log-rank = 0.576). Conclusion: Clear cell carcinoma is an aggressive histologic subtype of endometrial cancer that seems to be moderately affected by known predictors of survival rates in endometrioid carcinoma patients, except for the disease stage. Further research is needed to evaluate whether the molecular profiling of these patients may help predict survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, “Alexandra” General Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, “Alexandra” General Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Theano Christodoulou
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, “Alexandra” General Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Rodolakis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, “Alexandra” General Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Prokopakis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, “Alexandra” General Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Michalis Liontos
- First Department of Propedeutic Surgery, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippocration Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, “Alexandra” General Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, “Alexandra” General Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Boria F, Chiva L, Chacon E, Zanagnolo V, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Shamistan A, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Zusterzeel PLM, Aluloski I, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Demirkiran F, Vorgias G, Povolotskaya N, Coronado Martín PJ, Marina T, Zapardiel I, Bizzarri N, Gorostidi M, Gutierrez M, Manzour N, Berasaluce A, Martin-Calvo N. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:1236-1243. [PMID: 36583728 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether compliance with European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) surgery quality indicators impacts disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, 15 ESGO quality indicators were assessed in the SUCCOR database (patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 2009 IB1, FIGO 2018 IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2014), and the final score ranged between 0 and 16 points. Centers with more than 13 points were classified as high-quality indicator compliance centers. We constructed a weighted cohort using inverse probability weighting to adjust for the variables. We compared disease-free survival and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the weighted cohort. RESULTS A total of 838 patients were included in the study. The mean number of quality indicators compliance in this cohort was 13.6 (SD 1.45). A total of 479 (57.2%) patients were operated on at high compliance centers and 359 (42.8%) patients at low compliance centers. High compliance centers performed more open surgeries (58.4% vs 36.7%, p<0.01). Women who were operated on at centers with high compliance with quality indicators had a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR=0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.61; p<0.001). The association was reduced, but remained significant, after further adjustment for conization, surgical approach, and use of manipulator surgery (HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.75; p=0.001) and adjustment for adjuvant therapy (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74; p=0.001). Risk of death from disease was significantly lower in women operated on at centers with high adherence to quality indicators (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97; p=0.041). However, the association was not significant after adjustment for conization, surgical approach, use of manipulator surgery, and adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS Patients with early cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy in centers with high compliance with ESGO quality indicators had a lower risk of recurrence and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Boria
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Chiva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | | | - Anna Fagotti
- Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | - Constantijne Mom
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | | | - Octavio Arencibia
- Department of Gynecology, University Maternal Hospital Canary Islands, Las Palmas, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | - Tayfun Toptas
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dilyara Kaidarova
- Department of Oncogynecology, Kazahskij naucno-issledovatel'skij institut onkologii i radiologii, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Dmytro Golub
- Department of Surgery, LISOD - Israeli Oncological Hospital, Kyiv Region, Ukraine
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Robert Poka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology; Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | | | - Igor Aluloski
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopjeskopje, Macedonia
| | - Frederic Goffin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Robert Jach
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Margarida Bernardino
- Department of Gynecology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rasiah Bharathan
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Minna M Maenpaa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vladyslav Sukhin
- Department of Oncology, Radiology and Radiation Medicine, V N Karazin Kharkiv National University, Harkiv, Ukraine.,Department of Oncogynecology, Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology NAMS of Ukraine, Harkiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Kersti Kukk
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Jordi Ponce
- Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Fuat Demirkiran
- Istanbul University Cerrrahpasa Medical Faculty, istanbul, Turkey
| | - George Vorgias
- Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus, Attika, Greece
| | - Natalia Povolotskaya
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Pluvio J Coronado Martín
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tiermes Marina
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Monica Gutierrez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nabil Manzour
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Arantxa Berasaluce
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Nerea Martin-Calvo
- ,Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pandraklakis A, Prodromidou A, Haidopoulos D, Paspala A, Oikonomou MD, Machairiotis N, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Clinicopathological Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Endometriosis-Related Hemorrhagic Ascites: An Updated Systematic Review of the Literature. Cureus 2022; 14:e26222. [PMID: 35911338 PMCID: PMC9313015 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of ascites is a common clinical presentation in gynecologic oncology patients. Hemorrhagic ascites (HA) due to endometriosis is a rare presentation that can be easily misdiagnosed as ovarian malignancies. The present study aims to update the currently available knowledge on the characteristics of patients presenting with HA due to endometriosis. A systematic search was conducted for articles published from January 2000 to July 2020 using the Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases along with the references of the full-text articles retrieved. Papers describing cases of women over 18 years with or without previous history of endometriosis were assessed. Only cases with histologically proven hemorrhagic ascites of endometriosis origin were included. Twenty-nine studies (27 case reports and two case series) comprising 32 patients were evaluated. The mean patients’ age was 32 years, while six of the patients had a previous history of endometriosis. The mean amount of drained ascitic fluid was 4,200 mL, whereas three patients underwent thoracentesis due to pleural effusions. The treatment options included not only medical but also surgical therapies. Fertility preservation was achieved in 27 patients, while two of them achieved pregnancy with in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques. Endometriosis-related hemorrhagic ascites is a relatively rare expression of the disease. Endometriosis-related hemorrhagic ascites should be considered in the differential diagnosis (DD) of women with ascites and clinical suspicion of endometriosis. The available literature is limited to case reports and case series and thus indicates further research in the field to decode the pathophysiology of the disease and decide on the optimal treatment.
Collapse
|
17
|
Theodoulidis V, Prodromidou A, Stamatakis E, Alexakis N, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. Application of J‑Plasma in the excision of diaphragmatic lesions as part of complete cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 2022; 17:113. [DOI: 10.3892/mco.2022.2546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Theodoulidis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasia Prodromidou
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Stamatakis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, ‘Alexandra’ General Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Nicholas Alexakis
- First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippocratio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Theofanakis C, Koulakmanidis AM, Prodromidou A, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Young Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Dawn of a New Era. Front Surg 2022; 9:867993. [PMID: 35599800 PMCID: PMC9120767 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.867993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Charalampos Theofanakis
- School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: Charalampos Theofanakis
| | - Aristotelis-Marios Koulakmanidis
- School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasia Prodromidou
- School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pergialiotis V, Feroussis L, Rouvali A, Liatsou E, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Perineural invasion as a predictive biomarker of groin metastases and survival outcomes in vulvar cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Invest 2022; 40:733-741. [PMID: 35467488 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2022.2070918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
We searched international databases to identify evidence that refer to the impact of perineural invasion on survival outcomes of patients with squamous cell vulvar cancer. We identified six retrospective cohort studies that investigated 887 patients. Of those, 234 (26.4%) had perineural invasion in the pathology analysis. Women with perineural invasion were more likely to have inguinal lymph node metastases (HR 3.45, 95% CI 1.12, 10.67). The impact of perineural invasion on progression-free survival rates was significant (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.21, 2.15) as well as its impact on overall survival rates (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.94, 3.84).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- 1st department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Loukas Feroussis
- 1st department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Aggeliki Rouvali
- 1st department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Efstathia Liatsou
- 1st department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1st department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pergialiotis V, Sotiropoulou IM, Liatsou E, Liontos M, Frountzas M, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. Quality of life of ovarian cancer patients treated with combined platinum taxane chemotherapy: a systematic review of the literature. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:7147-7157. [PMID: 35459954 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07053-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of adjuvant therapy in ovarian cancer. Its impact on the quality of life (QoL) has been addressed in several studies; however, several misperceptions concerning this affect patient counseling and physicians' ability to overcome patient fears. In the present systematic review, we sought to accumulate current evidence in the field in order to help establish robust information that will help physicians answer patients' questions. METHODS The present systematic review is based on the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that evaluated patient QoL pre-, during, and post-chemotherapy with the use of the QLQC-30 were selected for inclusion. Their methodological quality was assessed with the before-after studies tool that is proposed by the National Institute of Health (NIH). RESULTS Ten studies that involved 5181 patients were included in the present systematic review. The risk of bias and methodological quality of included studies was of good and fair overall quality. Retrieved data suggest there is substantial evidence that points toward improved global QoL among ovarian cancer patients treated with taxanes-platinum combination therapy. Individual outcomes evaluated with the QLQ-C30 also provide positive results, although underreporting was noted. CONCLUSION Despite the significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting, the findings of this study reveal the significant benefit of combined platinum taxane chemotherapy on the QoL of ovarian cancer patients and can be used for patients counseling in order to reduce refusals that arise from fear of adverse effects that may negatively affect QoL. Graphical abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. .,Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 6, Danaidon Str., 15232, Halandri, Greece.
| | - Ioanna Myrto Sotiropoulou
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 6, Danaidon Str., 15232, Halandri, Greece
| | - Efstathia Liatsou
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 6, Danaidon Str., 15232, Halandri, Greece
| | - Michalis Liontos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Maximos Frountzas
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 6, Danaidon Str., 15232, Halandri, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Koutroumpa I, Diakosavvas M, Sotiropoulou M, Pergialiotis V, Angelou K, Liontos M, Haidopoulos D, Bamias A, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Identification and Biopsy of Sentinel Lymph Node in Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma: Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility. Cureus 2022; 14:e23838. [PMID: 35530888 PMCID: PMC9070105 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to the subsequent complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique has been increasingly employed. This study aimed to investigate the detectability of SLN using methylene blue and explore the diagnostic accuracy of SLN biopsy. Methodology A study was conducted from September 2015 to August 2018 and included 90 women with cervical cancer, FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics-2009) stage IA1-IIA1. Methylene blue was injected intracervically. Any detected dyed nodes were sent for frozen section biopsy, followed by bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. The predictive ability of SLN was evaluated in statistical terms after comparison of intraoperative biopsy and final histopathology. Results The sensitivity, specificity, false-negative rate, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) were 55.6%, 95.1%, 4.9%, 55.6%, and 95.1%, respectively. The SLN performance in patients with tumor size ≤2.2 cm, negative lymphovascular space involvement, and depth of stromal invasion ≤5 mm was superior (sensitivity 100%, specificity 93.5%, NPV 100%). Conclusions The SLN technique with blue dye alone is a feasible and adequate alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer in selected patients, given that a strict algorithm is applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioanna Koutroumpa
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Michail Diakosavvas
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Maria Sotiropoulou
- Department of Pathology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Vasilios Pergialiotis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Kyveli Angelou
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Michalis Liontos
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Prodromidou A, Koulakmanidis AM, Haidopoulos D, Nelson G, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Where Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols Meet the Three Major Current Pandemics: COVID-19, Obesity and Malignancy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071660. [PMID: 35406432 PMCID: PMC8996966 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly modified the medical services provided for patients that receive care either for COVID-19 or for those that need care for benign diseases, including obesity, or for malignant ones, such as gynecological cancer. We sought to investigate the association among three major worldwide health issues (COVID-19, obesity, and malignancy) and how ERAS protocols can potentially provide optimal management of patients with obesity and malignancy during the COVID-19 pandemic, with special attention to patients who required surgery for gynecologic oncology. We strongly believe that the application of ERAS protocols could play a key role during these unprecedented COVID-19 times. Abstract The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has transformed the provision of medical services for both patients that receive care for COVID-19 and for those that need care either for benign diseases, including obesity, or for malignancies, such as gynecological cancer. In this perspective article, we focus on the association among three major worldwide health issues and how ERAS protocols can potentially provide optimal management of patients with obesity and malignancy during the COVID-19 pandemic, with special attention to patients who required surgery for gynecologic oncology. A thorough search of the literature on the respective topics was performed. Patients with malignancy and obesity presented with increased vulnerability to COVID-19 infection. However, the management of their disease should not be withheld. Protective measures should be established to reduce exposure of patients with oncological diseases to SARS-CoV-2 while simultaneously enabling their access to vaccination. Since ERAS protocols have proved to be efficient in many surgical fields, including gynecologic oncology, general surgery, and orthopedics, we strongly believe that ERAS protocols may play a significant role in this effort. The end of the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be accurately predicted. Nevertheless, we have to ensure the appropriate and efficient management of certain groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Prodromidou
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.-M.K.); (D.H.); (A.R.); (N.T.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-6972751000
| | - Aristotelis-Marios Koulakmanidis
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.-M.K.); (D.H.); (A.R.); (N.T.)
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.-M.K.); (D.H.); (A.R.); (N.T.)
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.-M.K.); (D.H.); (A.R.); (N.T.)
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.-M.K.); (D.H.); (A.R.); (N.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Akgor U, Ayhan A, Shushkevich A, Ozdal B, Angelou K, Akbayır O, Kaidarova D, Ulrikh E, Stepanyan A, Ortac F, Aliyev S, Ozgul N, Taranenka S, Haberal A, Salman C, Seyhan A, Selcuk I, Haidopoulos D, Akıllı H, Bolatbekova R, Alaverdyan A, Taskin S, Murshudova S, Batur M, Berlev I, Gultekin M. OPEC study: An international multicenter study of ovarian preservation in endometrial cancers. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159:550-556. [PMID: 35323994 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility and oncological safety of ovarian preservation in early stage endometrial adenocarcinoma (EC) patients aged 40 and below. METHODS A total of 11 institutions from eight countries participated in the study. 169 of 5898 patients aged ≤40 years were eligible for the study. Patients with EC treated between March 2007 and January 2019 were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS The median duration of follow-up after EC diagnosis was 59 months (4-187). Among 169 participants, ovarian preservation surgery (OPS) was performed in 54 (31.9%), and BSO was performed in 115 (68.1%) patients. Although patients younger than 30 years of age were more likely to have OPS than patients aged 30 to 40 years (20.4% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.021), there was no significant difference by the mean age. There were no other relevant baseline differences between OPS and BSO groups. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in either the overall survival (P = 0.955) or recurrence-free survival (P = 0.068) among patients who underwent OPS, and BSO. CONCLUSION OPS appears to be safe without having any adverse impact on survival in women aged ≤40 years with FIGO Stage I EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utku Akgor
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Alexander Shushkevich
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, N.N. Alexandrov Cancer Center of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Bulent Ozdal
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kyveli Angelou
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ozgur Akbayır
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dilyara Kaidarova
- Oncogynecology Center, Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Elena Ulrikh
- North-Western State Medical University, N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Artem Stepanyan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, NAIRI Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Fırat Ortac
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Nejat Ozgul
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Siarhei Taranenka
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, N.N. Alexandrov Cancer Center of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Ali Haberal
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Coskun Salman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Alper Seyhan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ilker Selcuk
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Huseyin Akıllı
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Raikhan Bolatbekova
- Oncogynecology Center, Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Areg Alaverdyan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, NAIRI Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Salih Taskin
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Meltem Batur
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Igor Berlev
- North-Western State Medical University, N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Murat Gultekin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Diakosavvas M, Angelou K, Fasoulakis Z, Kathopoulis N, Zacharakis D, Blontzos N, Antsaklis P, Haidopoulos D, Daskalakis G, Rodolakis A, Theodora M. Myomectomy during pregnancy; diagnostical dilemmas: two case reports and a systematic review of the literature. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2022; 42:757-765. [PMID: 35264054 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2036976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Myomectomy in pregnancy, until this day, remains very controversial. We present two cases of successful antepartum myomectomies performed in the second trimester of gestation. In both cases, the initial suspected origin of these tumours was the ovaries. However, as it was shortly after confirmed, since both women underwent laparotomy, the diagnosis of these masses was uterine fibroids. Both cases resulted on the live birth of two healthy infants via caesarean section. Secondarily, we conducted a thorough review of current data of myomectomies performed during pregnancy, including the characteristics and diagnosis of the myomas of pregnant women, the surgical details and complications, along with the outcomes of these gestations. Overall, the analysis of cases published in international literature, suggests that the surgical removal of myomas during pregnancy can be considered safe, given certain indications and considerations. Our review comprises of 71 women undergoing excision of fibroids during pregnancy. Only three cases ended in a miscarriage while the remaining 68 resulted in a second or third trimester delivery. However, the data concerning the safety of the procedure are scarce and originate mostly from case reports. Thus, conclusions on the exact maternal and obstetrical complication rates cannot be drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Diakosavvas
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Kyveli Angelou
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Zacharias Fasoulakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kathopoulis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitris Zacharakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Blontzos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Panos Antsaklis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - George Daskalakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Marianna Theodora
- 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Alexandra" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Haidopoulos D, Pergialiotis V, Aggelou K, Thomakos N, Alexakis N, Stamatakis E, Rodolakis A. Pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: The experience of a tertiary center from Greece. Surg Oncol 2022; 40:101702. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
26
|
Theofanakis C, Thomakos N, Pergialiotis V, Theodoulidis V, Vlachos D, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A. 294. Abdominal radical trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage cervical cancer; a single institution experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
27
|
andraklakis A, Prodromidou A, Haidopoulos D, Lappas T, Stamatakis E, Valsamidis D, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. 303 Eras protocols in gynaecological oncology. Should we include epidural analgesia? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
28
|
Pergialiotis V, Angelou K, Vlachos D, Theofanakis C, Theodoulidis V, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. 355 Correlation of patient and tumor characteristics with recurrence patterns of patients undergoing pelvix exenteration for gynecologic malignancy: A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
29
|
Theodoulidis V, Vlachos D, Theofanakis C, Pergialiotis V, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. 405 The lockdown effect on gynaecological cancer surgeries during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022. [PMCID: PMC8941260 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
|
30
|
Theodoulidis V, Prodromidou A, Vlachos D, Theofanakis C, Pergialiotis V, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. 410 The application of j-plasma in the excision of diaphragmatic lesions as part of complete cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
31
|
Pergialiotis V, Angelou K, Vlachos D, Theofanakis C, Theodoulidis V, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. 356. Predictive Factors Of 2nd Degree+ Clavien-Dindo Complications In Pelvic Exenteration: a Retrospective Cohort Study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
32
|
Chacon E, Manzour N, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Núñez-Córdoba JM, Martin-Calvo N, Căpîlna ME, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Shamistan A, Gil Moreno A, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Tsolakidis D, Vujić G, Jedryka MA, Zusterzeel PLM, Beltman JJ, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Berlev I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Minguez JA, Vázquez-Vicente D, Castellanos T, Boria F, Alcazar JL, Chiva L. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:117-124. [PMID: 35039455 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate disease-free survival of cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009). METHODS A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted including patients from the Surgery in Cervical Cancer Comparing Different Surgical Aproaches in Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer (SUCCOR) database with FIGO 2009 IB1 cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. We used propensity score matching to minimize the potential allocation biases arising from the retrospective design. Patients who underwent conization but were similar for other measured characteristics were matched 1:1 to patients from the non-cone group using a caliper width ≤0.2 standard deviations of the logit odds of the estimated propensity score. RESULTS We obtained a weighted cohort of 374 patients (187 patients with prior conization and 187 non-conization patients). We found a 65% reduction in the risk of relapse for patients who had cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.75, p=0.007) and a 75% reduction in the risk of death for the same sample (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.90, p=0.033). In addition, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery without prior conization had a 5.63 times higher chance of relapse compared with those who had an open approach and previous conization (HR 5.63, 95% CI 1.64 to 19.3, p=0.006). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery with prior conization and those who underwent open surgery without prior conization showed no differences in relapse rates compared with those who underwent open surgery with prior cone biopsy (reference) (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 7.76, p=0.349 and HR 2.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 10.86, p=0.106 respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, patients undergoing cervical conization before radical hysterectomy had a significantly lower risk of relapse and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Chacon
- Gynecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Nabil Manzour
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra Departamento de Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Nerea Martin-Calvo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Anna Fagotti
- University Hospital Agostino Gemelli Gynaecological Oncology Complex Operative Unit, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | | | - Constantijne Mom
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Antonio Gil Moreno
- Gynecology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Sant Cugat Del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Tayfun Toptas
- Gynecologic Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dilyara Kaidarova
- Oncogynecology, Kazahskij Naucno-issledovatel'skij Institut Onkologii i Radiologii, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Dmytro Golub
- Department of Surgery, LISOD-Israeli Oncological Hospital, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico SantOrsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Robert Poka
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Dimitrios Tsolakidis
- General Hospital of Thessaloniki Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia, Greece
| | | | - Marcin A Jedryka
- Oncological Gynecology, Lower Silesian Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Frederic Goffin
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Robert Jach
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Igor Berlev
- North-Western State Medical University, NN Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Saint-Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Margarida Bernardino
- Gynecology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rasiah Bharathan
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Maximilian Lanner
- Kardinal Schwarzenberg'sches Krankenhaus, Schwarzach, Steiermark, Austria
| | - Minna M Maenpaa
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vladyslav Sukhin
- Oncogynecology, Grigorev Institute for Radiology, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.,Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Kersti Kukk
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Jordi Ponce
- Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Felix Boria
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra Departamento de Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Luis Alcazar
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Luis Chiva
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prodromidou A, Phelps DL, Pergialiotis V, Cunnea P, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Fotopoulou C, Haidopoulos D. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 270:212-220. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
34
|
Vlachos DE, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D, Pergialiotis V, Theodoulidis V, Protopapas A, Rodolakis A. Ocular metastasis of primary gynecological malignancies, a rare but not insignificant entity: A systematic review. Niger J Clin Pract 2022; 25:739-746. [DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_1763_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
35
|
Liontos M, Zografos E, Zoumpourlis P, Andrikopoulou A, Svarna A, Fiste O, Kunadis E, Papatheodoridi AM, Kaparelou M, Koutsoukos K, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A, Dimopoulos MA, Zagouri F. BRCA1/2 Mutation Types Do Not Affect Prognosis in Ovarian Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:4446-4456. [PMID: 34898566 PMCID: PMC8628789 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28060377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most lethal type of epithelial ovarian cancer, with a prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 mutations as high as 20%. Our objective is to determine whether the location of mutations in the different domains of the BRCA1/2 genes affects the clinical outcome of HGSOC patients. METHODS A total of 51 women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutated ovarian cancer were identified. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS In our study cohort, 35 patients were carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 and 16 in BRCA2. The median PFS time following completion of the primary therapy was 23.8 months (95% CI 20.1-27.5) and the median OS was 92.9 months (95% CI 69.8-116.1) in all BRCA carriers. After multivariate analysis, no significant association among the location or type of BRCA1/2 mutation with PFS or OS was identified. Notably, significant differences in PFS between carriers of identical mutations in the same BRCA gene were detected. CONCLUSIONS Among HGSOC patients, BRCA1/2 carriers with mutations in different locations of the genes show no significant difference in survival outcomes, in terms of PFS and OS, suggesting the potential effect of other genetic abnormalities and co-contributing risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michalis Liontos
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Eleni Zografos
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Panagiotis Zoumpourlis
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Angeliki Andrikopoulou
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Anna Svarna
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Oraianthi Fiste
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Elena Kunadis
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Alkistis Maria Papatheodoridi
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Maria Kaparelou
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Konstantinos Koutsoukos
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Nikoloas Thomakos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gyencology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (N.T.); (D.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gyencology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (N.T.); (D.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gyencology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (N.T.); (D.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| | - Flora Zagouri
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.Z.); (P.Z.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (O.F.); (E.K.); (A.M.P.); (M.K.); (K.K.); (M.-A.D.); (F.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Liontos M, Andrikopoulou A, Koutsoukos K, Markellos C, Skafida E, Fiste O, Kaparelou M, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A, Dimopoulos MA, Zagouri F. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Ovarian Res 2021; 14:148. [PMID: 34724958 PMCID: PMC8561989 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-021-00902-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) is the recommended approach in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, most patients eventually relapse despite the initial high response rate to chemotherapy. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a well-known biomarker that reflects severe inflammation, critical illness, and mortality in various diseases. Chemotherapy response score (CRS) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been identified as potential biomarkers of platinum resistance and disease prognosis. We retrospectively evaluated 132 patients with stage IIIc or IV ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer who had received NACT followed by IDS from 01/01/2003 to 31/12/2018. CRS was assessed on omental specimens collected from IDS according to ICCR guidelines. RESULTS Median age was 64.57 years (SD: 9.72; range 39.2-87.1). Most ovarian tumors were serous epithelial (90.9%; 120/132). An elevated NLR (defined as > 3) was observed in 72% (95/132) of patients in contrast with 28% (37/132) of patients characterized by low NLR status. Median PFS (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 13.05 months (95% CI: 11.42-14.67)) and 34.69 months (95% CI: 23.26-46.12) respectively. In univariate analysis, CRS3 score was significantly associated with prolonged mPFS (CRS1/2: 12.79 months vs CRS3: 17.7 months; P = 0.008). CRS score was not associated with mOS (P = 0.876). High NLR was not significantly associated with mPFS (P = 0.128), however it was significantly associated with poor mOS (P = 0.012). In multivariate analysis, only performance of surgery maintained its statistical significance with both PFS (P = 0.001) and OS (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION NLR could serve as a useful predictor of OS but not PFS in ovarian cancer patients receiving NACT. In accordance with our previous study, CRS score at omentum was found to be associated with PFS but not OS in ovarian cancer patients treated with NACT and IDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Liontos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - A Andrikopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - K Koutsoukos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - C Markellos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - E Skafida
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - O Fiste
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - M Kaparelou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - N Thomakos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - D Haidopoulos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Rodolakis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - M A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - F Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Douligeris A, Pergialiotis V, Fasoulakis Z, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. Is there a correlation of positive peritoneal washing cytology during interval debulking surgery on the survival outcomes of ovarian cancer patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021; 51:102256. [PMID: 34678477 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS We systematically searched Medline (1966-2020), Scopus (2004-2020), EMBASE (1980-2020), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL (1999-2020), Clinicaltrials.gov (2008-2020) and Google Scholar (2004-2020). All the studies that investigated the correlation of peritoneal washing cytology with survival outcomes of patients undergoing interval debulking for ovarian cancer, were finally included in the present meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 7 retrospective studies were included, comprising 907 patients, of whom 535 had positive peritoneal washing cytology on interval debulking surgery. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed as moderate, primarily due to the lack of data referring to the adequacy of the follow-up of patients and secondarily due the lack of comparability of patients. Progression - free survival was significantly better in the negative peritoneal cytology group (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.73, 2.48 respectively), however, overall survival did not reach a significant difference among the two groups (HR 1.90, 95% CI 0.99, 3,65, p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS Our data support a negative correlation between positive peritoneal washing cytology at interval debulking surgery and the survival of ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasios Douligeris
- Gynaecological Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, Greece.
| | - Vasilios Pergialiotis
- Gynaecological Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| | - Zacharias Fasoulakis
- Gynaecological Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- Gynaecological Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Gynaecological Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra General Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pergialiotis V, Bellos I, Douligeris A, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. The impact of adjuvant hysterectomy on survival outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A network meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:261-267. [PMID: 34548217 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Various articles have addressed the impact of hysterectomy on survival outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). This study was designed to evaluate whether treatment modalities that include hysterectomy as an option for the treatment of LACC patients are superior to standard chemo-radiotherapy. METHODS Literature search was performed using the Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov databases. Observational (prospective and retrospective) and randomized trials that included adjuvant hysterectomy in at least one treatment group. A network meta-analysis was carried out in R 3.4.3 using the pcnetmeta package, which uses a Bayesian hierarchical model. The credibility of evidence was appraised with the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool. RESULTS Overall, 14 studies were included in the present systematic review that involved 2302 patients with LACC. Every potential combination of external beam radiotherapy, intracavitary brachytherapy, chemotherapy and surgery was considered to be eligible for inclusion. The results of the network meta-analysis suggested that the various treatment alternatives did not differ in terms of survival outcomes. Furthermore, the qualitative analysis revealed that hysterectomy was accompanied by considerable perioperative morbidity; therefore, rendering its addition to the treatment scheme of LACC patients inappropriate. CONCLUSIONS Patients with LACC do not seem to benefit substantially by the addition of hysterectomy to standard chemo-radiotherapy. Moreover, the operation is accompanied by substantial perioperative morbidity, thus, its implementation in clinical practice should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
| | - Ioannis Bellos
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Douligeris
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fotopoulou C, Planchamp F, Aytulu T, Chiva L, Cina A, Ergönül Ö, Fagotti A, Haidopoulos D, Hasenburg A, Hughes C, Knapp P, Morice P, Schneider S, Sehouli J, Stamatakis E, Suria S, Taskiran C, Trappe RU, Campbell J. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology guidelines for the peri-operative management of advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing debulking surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1199-1206. [PMID: 34407962 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) developed and established for the first time in 2016, and updated in 2020, quality indicators for advanced ovarian cancer surgery to audit and improve clinical practice in Europe and beyond. As a sequela of the continuous effort to improve oncologic care in patients with ovarian cancer, ESGO issued in 2018 a consensus guidance jointly with the European Society of Medical Oncology addressing in a multidisciplinary fashion 20 selected key questions in the management of ovarian cancer, ranging from molecular pathology to palliation in primary and relapse disease. In order to complement the above achievements and consolidate the promoted systemic advances and surgical expertise with adequate peri-operative management, ESGO developed, as the next step, clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of peri-operative care and management of complications as part of its mission to improve the quality of care for women with advanced ovarian cancer and reduce iatrogenic morbidity. To do so, ESGO nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of ovarian cancer (18 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence based, the literature published since 2015, identified from a systematic search, was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 117 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | - Luis Chiva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alessandro Cina
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, Italy
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mainz University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Cathy Hughes
- Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pawel Knapp
- Uniwersytet Medyczny w Bialymstoku, Bialystok, Poland
| | | | | | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | | | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Jeremy Campbell
- Department of Anaesthetics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Boria F, Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Martin-Calvo N, Căpîlna ME, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Shamistan A, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Tsolakidis D, Vujić G, Jedryka MA, Zusterzeel PLM, Beltman JJ, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Berlev I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Alonso-Espías M, Minguez JA, Vázquez-Vicente D, Manzour N, Jurado M, Castellanos T, Chacon E, Alcazar JL. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1212-1219. [PMID: 34321289 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Comprehensive updated information on cervical cancer surgical treatment in Europe is scarce. OBJECTIVE To evaluate baseline characteristics of women with early cervical cancer and to analyze the outcomes of the ESGO quality indicators after radical hysterectomy in the SUCCOR database. METHODS The SUCCOR database consisted of 1272 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) between January 2013 and December 2014. After exclusion criteria, the final sample included 1156 patients. This study first described the clinical, surgical, pathological, and follow-up variables of this population and then analyzed the outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) after radical hysterectomy. Surgical-related ESGO quality indicators were assessed and the accomplishment of the stated recommendations was verified. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 47.1 years (SD 10.8), with a mean body mass index of 25.4 kg/m2 (SD 4.9). A total of 423 (36.6%) patients had a previous cone biopsy. Tumor size (clinical examination) <2 cm was observed in 667 (57.7%) patients. The most frequent histology type was squamous carcinoma (794 (68.7%) patients), and positive lymph nodes were found in 143 (12.4%) patients. A total of 633 (54.8%) patients were operated by open abdominal surgery. Intra-operative complications occurred in 108 (9.3%) patients, and post-operative complications during the first month occurred in 249 (21.5%) patients, with bladder dysfunction as the most frequent event (119 (10.3%) patients). Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication occurred in 56 (4.8%) patients. A total of 510 (44.1%) patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 58 months (range 0-84), the 5-year disease-free survival was 88.3%, and the overall survival was 94.9%. In our population, 10 of the 11 surgical-related quality indicators currently recommended by ESGO were fully fulfilled 5 years before its implementation. CONCLUSIONS In this European cohort, the rate of adjuvant therapy after radical hysterectomy is higher than for most similar patients reported in the literature. The majority of centers were already following the European recommendations even 5 years prior to the ESGO quality indicator implementations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Boria
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra Departamento de Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Chiva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nerea Martin-Calvo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman, Child, and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Constantijne Mom
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Tayfun Toptas
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dilyara Kaidarova
- Oncogynecology, Kazahskij Naucno-Issledovatel'skij Institut Onkologii i Radiologii, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mariana Tavares
- Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal
| | - Dmytro Golub
- Department of Surgery, LISOD - Israeli Oncological Hospital, Kyiv region, Ukraine
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico SantOrsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Robert Poka
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Dimitrios Tsolakidis
- General Hospital of Thessaloniki Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia, Greece
| | | | - Marcin A Jedryka
- Department of Oncological Gynecology, Uniwersytet Medyczny im Piastów Śląskich we Wrocławiu (Wroclaw Medical University), Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Frederic Goffin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Robert Jach
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Igor Berlev
- North-Western State Medical University. N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Saint-Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Margarida Bernardino
- Department of Gynecology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rasiah Bharathan
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Maximilian Lanner
- Kardinal Schwarzenberg'sches Krankenhaus, Schwarzach, Steiermark, Austria
| | - Minna M Maenpaa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vladyslav Sukhin
- Department of Oncology, Radiology and Radiation Medicine, V N Karazin Kharkiv National University, Harkiv, Ukraine.,Department of Oncogynecology, Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology NAMS of Ukraine, Harkiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.,Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Kersti Kukk
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Jordi Ponce
- Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain
| | - María Alonso-Espías
- Department of Gynecologíc Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Angel Minguez
- Department of Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | | | - Nabil Manzour
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra Departamento de Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Matias Jurado
- Department of Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Teresa Castellanos
- Department of Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Juan Luis Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine; University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Thomakos N, Prodromidou A, Haidopoulos D, Machairas N, Rodolakis A. Postoperative Admission in Critical Care Units Following Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: Outcomes Based on a Systematic Review and Authors' Recommendations. In Vivo 2021; 34:2201-2208. [PMID: 32871742 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The present study aimed to evaluate the predictors of admission to the Critical Care Units (CCUs) and factors predisposing to prolonged stay in CCUs after gynecological oncology surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Studies which addressed cases of women who underwent surgery for gynecological malignancies and required postoperative CCU admission were included. RESULTS Seven studies with 3820 patients were included. Among them, 1680 required admission to CCU. Advanced age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, longer operative times, protracted blood loss and intestinal resection were associated with higher probability of CCU admission. Patients' age, operative times, blood loos and intestinal resection were significant predictors of prolonged stay to CCUs. CONCLUSION Admission to CCU and length of stay following surgery for gynecologic malignancies is driven by specific patient characteristics as well as intraoperative values. Further studies are needed to validate high risk patients who will benefit from postoperative care to CCUs to ensure favorable postoperative outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasia Prodromidou
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Machairas
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Liontos M, Papatheodoridi A, Andrikopoulou A, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A, Zagouri F, Bamias A, Dimopoulos MA. Management of the Elderly Patients with High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer in the REAL-WORLD Setting. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1143-1152. [PMID: 33800101 PMCID: PMC8025751 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28020110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of elderly patients with neoplasia is challenging. Age is a known prognostic factor in ovarian cancer but the optimal treatment of elderly patients has not been determined. We undertook a retrospective analysis to determine clinical practice in advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients older than 70 years of age. Methods: Medical records of women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, stage III and IV were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 735 patients were identified with a median age of 61.5 years. 22.4% among them were older than 70 years of age at diagnosis. First-line Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were significantly worse in elderly patients in comparison to the younger ones [mPFS 11.3 months vs. 14.8 months, (p < 0.001) and mOS 30.2 months vs. 45.6 months (p < 0.001)]. However, elderly patients were characterized by worse ECOG-Performance Status and they were more frequently treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Interval Debulking Surgery, while often they were more frequently denied debulking surgery compared to patients under 70 years of age. Moreover, elderly patients received more frequently monotherapy with platinum as frontline treatment. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the outcome of the debulking surgery in comparison to the younger patients or the frequency that gBRCA test was performed. Age over 70 years did not retain its significance for either Progression-Free Survival or Overall Survival when adjusted for all other reported prognostic factors. Conclusions: Elderly ovarian cancer patients have a worse prognosis. Comprehensive geriatric assessment should be performed for the optimal treatment of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michalis Liontos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (A.A.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (M.-A.D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-2132162845; Fax: +30-2132162511
| | - Alkistis Papatheodoridi
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (A.A.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Angeliki Andrikopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (A.A.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (N.T.); (D.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (N.T.); (D.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (N.T.); (D.H.); (A.R.)
| | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (A.A.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (A.A.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (M.-A.D.)
| | - Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (A.P.); (A.A.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (M.-A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Prodromidou A, Theofanakis C, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A. Fertility sparing surgery for early-stage clear cell carcinoma of the ovary; A systematic review and analysis of obstetric outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1286-1291. [PMID: 33509613 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCOC), accounts for 5-25% of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases. A significant proportion of patients with CCOC are of reproductive age, wishing to preserve their fertility. The application of fertility sparing surgery (FSS) in those patients has been extensively criticized, due to the high reported recurrence rates and chemotherapy resistance. The aim of the present study was to accumulate the current knowledge on obstetric and fertility outcomes of patients with early stage CCOC who underwent fertility sparing surgery. A meticulous search of 3 electronic databases was conducted for articles published up to June 2020 relevant in the field using the terms "ovarian cancer", "clear cell", "fertility sparing", "conservative treatment". Studies that reported pregnancy and maternal outcomes after fertility sparing surgery for the management of early stage CCOC were considered eligible. A total of 5 studies which comprised of 60 patients with early stage CCOC, who underwent fertility-sparing surgery, were reviewed. Ten patients (16.6%) had disease recurrence. The total clinical pregnancy rate of 32% with a proportion of 24% of live birth rates in 12 of the included patients. The median interval from surgery to pregnancy was 41.5 months, while no evidence of disease was recorded among the patients who achieved pregnancy. No difference in survival and recurrence rates among patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery and those who had radical surgical procedures. Fertility-sparing treatment for International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IA/IC CCOC seems to be an acceptable treatment option for selected premenopausal women who strongly wish to preserve their childbearing potential. However, larger studies are needed to validate the safety of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Prodromidou
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| | - Charalampos Theofanakis
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Greece.
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Thomakos N, Dimopoulou S, Sotiropoulou M, Machairiotis N, Pandraklakis A, Haidopoulos D, Liontos M, Bamias A, Rodolakis A. How do different histologic components of mixed endometrial carcinomas affect prognosis? Does it really matter? Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2020; 42:105-111. [PMID: 33781006 DOI: 10.1515/hmbci-2020-0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare outcomes of patients with mixed and pure endometrial carcinomas (MEC). We reviewed data of patients with MEC, endometroid (EC), serous (SC), and clear cell (CC) carcinomas between 2002 and 2015. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DF) survival rates were evaluated, according to the percentage of histologic components. Clinicopathological variables and treatment strategies were assessed. Furthermore, χ 2 tests were used to compare proportions and Kaplan-Meier curves to compare recurrence and survival. Sample consisted of 302 cases with mean age 66.3 years. Early-stage disease was recorded in EC compared with CC and SC. Adnexal involvement was more frequent in MEC compared with EC (p=0.043). Extra uterine metastasis was more frequent in the SC compared to the EC group, while lymphovascular space involvement was more frequent in the MEC and CC compared to the SC (p=0.001). EC had less omentum involvement compared to CC (p=0.035) and SC (p<0.001). Furthermore, cervical involvement was more frequent in CC compared to EC (p=0.011). Recurrence (p=0.265) and OS (p=0.533) were found to be similar in MEC compared with CC, SC, and EC. Moreover, recurrence and OS were similar between EC-CC and EC-SC. There were no differences in recurrence and survival in MEC with a type II component larger than 10% or 20% (p>0.05).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Stefania Dimopoulou
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Sotiropoulou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Surrey,UK
| | | | - Anastasios Pandraklakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Michalis Liontos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Oncology Unit, National and Kapodistrian Unviersity of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Oncology Unit, National and Kapodistrian Unviersity of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gultekin M, Ak S, Ayhan A, Strojna A, Pletnev A, Fagotti A, Perrone AM, Erzeneoglu BE, Temiz BE, Lemley B, Soyak B, Hughes C, Cibula D, Haidopoulos D, Brennan D, Cola E, van der Steen-Banasik E, Urkmez E, Akilli H, Zapardiel I, Tóth I, Sehouli J, Zalewski K, Bahremand K, Chiva L, Mirza MR, Papageorgiou M, Zoltan N, Adámková P, Morice P, Garrido-Mallach S, Akgor U, Theodoulidis V, Arik Z, Steffensen KD, Fotopoulou C. Perspectives, fears and expectations of patients with gynaecological cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Pan-European study of the European Network of Gynaecological Cancer Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe). Cancer Med 2020; 10:208-219. [PMID: 33205595 PMCID: PMC7753798 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on European gynaecological cancer patients under active treatment or follow‐up has not been documented. We sought to capture the patient perceptions of the COVID‐19 implications and the worldwide imposed treatment modifications. Methods A patient survey was conducted in 16 European countries, using a new COVID‐19‐related questionnaire, developed by ENGAGe and the Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale questionnaire (HADS). The survey was promoted by national patient advocacy groups and charitable organisations. Findings We collected 1388 forms; 592 online and 796 hard‐copy (May, 2020). We excluded 137 due to missing data. Median patients’ age was 55 years (range: 18–89), 54.7% had ovarian cancer and 15.5% were preoperative. Even though 73.2% of patients named cancer as a risk factor for COVID‐19, only 17.5% were more afraid of COVID‐19 than their cancer condition, with advanced age (>70 years) as the only significant risk factor for that. Overall, 71% were concerned about cancer progression if their treatment/follow‐up was cancelled/postponed. Most patients (64%) had their care continued as planned, but 72.3% (n = 892) said that they received no information around overall COVID‐19 infection rates of patients and staff, testing or measures taken in their treating hospital. Mean HADS Anxiety and Depression Scores were 8.8 (range: 5.3–12) and 8.1 (range: 3.8–13.4), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified high HADS‐depression scores, having experienced modifications of care due to the pandemic and concern about not being able to visit their doctor as independent predictors of patients’ anxiety. Interpretation Gynaecological cancer patients expressed significant anxiety about progression of their disease due to modifications of care related to the COVID‐19 pandemic and wished to pursue their treatment as planned despite the associated risks. Healthcare professionals should take this into consideration when making decisions that impact patients care in times of crisis and to develop initiatives to improve patients’ communication and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Gultekin
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.,European Society of Gynaecological Oncoloy (ESGO, European Network of Gynaecological Cancers Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Executive Group, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Sertac Ak
- Stress Assesment and Research Center (STAR, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aleksandra Strojna
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Andrei Pletnev
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Center of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | | | - B Emre Erzeneoglu
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - B Esat Temiz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Birthe Lemley
- European Society of Gynaecological Oncoloy (ESGO, European Network of Gynaecological Cancers Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Executive Group, Prague, Czech Republic.,KIU - Patient Organisation for Women with Gynaecological Cancer, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Burcu Soyak
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cathy Hughes
- Ovacome - Ovarian Cancer Support Charity, London, UK.,Department of Gynecology, Imperial College London, NHS Trust London, London, UK
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Center, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Donal Brennan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University College Dublin (UCD) School of Medicine, Catherine McAuley Research Centre, Mater University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Edoardo Cola
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Esra Urkmez
- European Society of Gynaecological Oncoloy (ESGO, European Network of Gynaecological Cancers Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Executive Group, Prague, Czech Republic.,Dance With Cancer Society, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Akilli
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Icó Tóth
- European Society of Gynaecological Oncoloy (ESGO, European Network of Gynaecological Cancers Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Executive Group, Prague, Czech Republic.,Mallow Flower Foundation, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité-University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kamil Zalewski
- European Society of Gynaecological Oncoloy (ESGO, European Network of Gynaecological Cancers Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Executive Group, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Gynecological Oncology, Hollycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.,Department of Molecular and Translational Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kiarash Bahremand
- Department of Gynaecology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Luis Chiva
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, The Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Papageorgiou
- European Society of Gynaecological Oncoloy (ESGO, European Network of Gynaecological Cancers Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Executive Group, Prague, Czech Republic.,K.E.F.I. Cancer Society, Athens, Greece
| | - Novak Zoltan
- Department of Gynaecology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Petra Adámková
- European Society of Gynaecological Oncoloy (ESGO, European Network of Gynaecological Cancers Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Executive Group, Prague, Czech Republic.,Onko Unie Cancer Society, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Utku Akgor
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Vasilis Theodoulidis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Zafer Arik
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Karina D Steffensen
- European Society of Gynaecological Oncoloy (ESGO, European Network of Gynaecological Cancers Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Executive Group, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rountis A, Pergialiotis V, Tsetsa P, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D. Management options for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Clin Pract 2020; 74:e13598. [PMID: 32602195 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) is a rare disease of the lower genital tract, strongly associated with HPV infection, which may progress to vaginal carcinoma. PURPOSE The aim of this review is to summarise current treatment options, evaluate their efficacy and make provide recommendations on the optimal management of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive search of the literature was performed using the PubMed database for articles referring to the treatment of VaIN. We restricted our search only in articles written in English with publication dates within the last 10 years. RESULTS Surgical approach included local excision, CO2 laser ablation, CO2 laser skinning colpectomy and laparoscopic upper vaginectomy. Medical management was based on intravaginally administered topical agents such as 5% imiquimod cream, 5-fluorouracil cream and topical oestrogens. Intracavitary radiation therapy was reported in two forms: Low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy and high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. All treatment options were well tolerated, with satisfactory cure rates and acceptable recurrence rates. CONCLUSION The choice of treatment depends upon many factors. Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment and should be performed if invasion cannot be excluded. Topical agents are useful for persistent, multifocal lesions or for women that cannot undergo surgical treatment. Brachytherapy is associated with high morbidity rates and should be reserved for women who have multifocal disease, are poor surgical candidates and/or have failed other treatments. CO2 laser ablation achieves minimal scarring and sexual dysfunction; however, invasive disease should be ruled out with biopsies before the initiation of the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Argirios Rountis
- First department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasilios Pergialiotis
- First department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Paraskevi Tsetsa
- First department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- First department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- First department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pandraklakis A, Thomakos N, Prodromidou A, Oikonomou MD, Papanikolaou IG, Vlachos DEG, Haidopoulos D, Daskalakis G, Rodolakis A. The Conundrum of Prematurity and Pregnancy Outcomes after Fertility Sparing Treatment Modalities for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2020; 62:453-461. [DOI: 10.3897/folmed.62.e48736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in modern medicine have allowed patients with early stage cervical cancer (stages Ia - IIai) to preserve their fertility with oncologic efficacy comparable to previous radical treatments. A variety of conservative-fertility sparing procedures, also known as Fertility Sparing Surgeries (FSS) have been proposed. The present review aimed to provide the current evidence on obstetric outcomes and the prematurity rates as well as to discuss the management modalities of these high-risk pregnancies. Our review of the literature included 3042 women with early cervical cancer, of whom 2838 underwent FSS (204 excluded for oncologic reasons). Almost half of these patients attempted to become pregnant and about two thirds of them achieved at least one pregnancy either spontaneously or with the help of Assisted Reproduction Technologies. Data revealed that 63.9% of these pregnancies resulted in live births, whereas 37.6% of them were preterm. The main cause of preterm births in this subpopulation is the postoperative cervical length restriction that consequently leads to cervical incompetence and ascending infections that eventually lead to (clinical or subclinical) chorioamnionitis. Radical operations such as ART, VRT and MIRT presented with higher prematurity rates. The lack of standardized protocols for the management of pregnancies after FSS precluded reaching to firm results with regards to the efficacy of them in achieving favourable obstetrical outcomes. Further large volume studies are warranted with the intent to acquire standardized guidelines for pregnancies achieved after FSS for early stage cervical cancer.
Collapse
|
48
|
Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Martin-Calvo N, Arévalo-Serrano J, Căpîlna ME, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Aliyev S, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Tsolakidis D, Vujić G, Jedryka MA, Zusterzeel PLM, Beltman JJ, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Berlev I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Minguez JA, Vázquez-Vicente D, Castellanos T, Chacon E, Alcazar JL. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1269-1277. [PMID: 32788262 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer has demonstrated in recent publications worse outcomes than open surgery. The primary objective of the SUCCOR study, a European, multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study was to evaluate disease-free survival in patients with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009) cervical cancer undergoing open vs minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. As a secondary objective, we aimed to investigate the association between protective surgical maneuvers and the risk of relapse. METHODS We obtained data from 1272 patients that underwent a radical hysterectomy by open or minimally invasive surgery for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) from January 2013 to December 2014. After applying all the inclusion-exclusion criteria, we used an inverse probability weighting to construct a weighted cohort of 693 patients to compare outcomes (minimally invasive surgery vs open). The first endpoint compared disease-free survival at 4.5 years in both groups. Secondary endpoints compared overall survival among groups and the impact of the use of a uterine manipulator and protective closure of the colpotomy over the tumor in the minimally invasive surgery group. RESULTS Mean age was 48.3 years (range; 23-83) while the mean BMI was 25.7 kg/m2 (range; 15-49). The risk of recurrence for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery was twice as high as that in the open surgery group (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.15; P=0.001). Similarly, the risk of death was 2.42-times higher than in the open surgery group (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.60, P=0.005). Patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery using a uterine manipulator had a 2.76-times higher hazard of relapse (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.75 to 4.33; P<0.001) and those without the use of a uterine manipulator had similar disease-free-survival to the open surgery group (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.15; P=0.20). Moreover, patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery with protective vaginal closure had similar rates of relapse to those who underwent open surgery (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.15 to 2.59; P<0.52). CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer increased the risk of relapse and death compared with open surgery. In this study, avoiding the uterine manipulator and using maneuvers to avoid tumor spread at the time of colpotomy in minimally invasive surgery was associated with similar outcomes to open surgery. Further prospective studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Chiva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Nerea Martin-Calvo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mario Malzoni
- Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Tayfun Toptas
- Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dilyara Kaidarova
- Oncogynecology, Kazahskij Naucno-issledovatel'skij Institut Onkologii i Radiologii, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Dmytro Golub
- LISOD - Israeli Oncological Hospital, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico SantOrsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Robert Poka
- Obstetrics and Gynecology; Unit of Gynecologic Oncology; Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | | | | | - Marcin A Jedryka
- Oncological Gynecology, Lower Silesian Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Frederic Goffin
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Robert Jach
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Igor Berlev
- North-Western State Medical University. N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
| | | | | | | | - Minna M Maenpaa
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vladyslav Sukhin
- Oncogynecology, Grigorev Institute for Radiology, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.,Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Kersti Kukk
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Jordi Ponce
- Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Jose Angel Minguez
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Teresa Castellanos
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Juan Luis Alcazar
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine; University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Diakosavvas M, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D, Liontos M, Rodolakis A. Controversies in preoperative bowel preparation in gynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgery: a review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 302:1049-1061. [PMID: 32740871 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05704-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this review is to assess the impact of mechanical and oral antibiotics bowel preparation on surgical performance and to investigate their role before gynecologic surgical procedures regarding the infection rates. We also aim to study the updated evidence regarding the use of these different types of bowel preparation, as well as the current preoperative practice applied. METHODS An extensive search of the literature was conducted with Medline/PubMed, and the Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews being used for our primary search. RESULTS To date, due to the conflicting guidelines by the scientific societies, surgeons do not use a specific pattern of bowel preparation regimen. There are no strong evidence supporting mechanical bowel preparation, but instead, in many cases, patients' adverse effects, both physiological and psychological have been noted. On the other hand, the combined use of oral antibiotic and mechanical bowel preparation has been proven beneficial in colorectal surgery in reducing postoperative morbidities. CONCLUSION Based on current literature, in gynecologic surgeries with minimal probability of intraluminal entry, a regimen without any bowel preparation should be applied. The combined administration of both mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation, or even the use of the oral antibiotics alone, should be preserved for cases of increased complexity, where bowel involvement is highly anticipated, such as in gynecologic oncology, as stated in the ERAS protocols. Nonetheless, further research specific to gynecologic surgery is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Diakosavvas
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11528, Athens, Greece.
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11528, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11528, Athens, Greece
| | - Michael Liontos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11528, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, 11528, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pergialiotis V, Nikolaou C, Haidopoulos D, Frountzas M, Thomakos N, Bellos I, Papapanagiotou A, Rodolakis A. PIK3CA Mutations and Their Impact on Survival Outcomes of Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review. Acta Cytol 2020; 64:547-555. [PMID: 32683364 DOI: 10.1159/000509095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several studies have implicated the PIK3/AKT pathway in the pathophysiology of cancer progression as its activation seems to be aberrant in several forms of cancer. The purpose of the present systematic review is to evaluate the impact of PIK3CA mutations on survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer. METHODS We used the Medline (1966-2020), Scopus (2004-2020), ClinicalTrials.gov (2008-2020), EMBASE (1980-2020), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (1999-2020), and Google Scholar (2004-2020) databases in our primary search along with the reference lists of electronically retrieved full-text papers. Statistical meta-analysis was performed with the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS Overall, 12 articles were included in the present study that comprised 2,196 women with cervical cancer. Of those, 3 studies did not report significant differences in survival outcomes among patients with mutated versus wild-type PIK3CA tumors, 5 studies reported decreased survival outcomes, and 3 studies revealed increased survival rates. The meta-analysis revealed that patients with the mutated PIK3CA genotypes had worse overall survival compared to patients with wild-type PIK3CA (HR 2.31; 95% CI: 1.51, 3.55; 95% PI: 0.54, 9.96; data from 3 studies) and the same was observed in the case of DFS rates (HR 1.82; 95% CI: 1.47, 2.25; 95% PI: 1.29, 2.56; data from 4 studies). CONCLUSION Current evidence concerning the impact of PIK3CA mutations on survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer is inconclusive, although the majority of included studies support a potential negative effect, primarily among those with squamous cell carcinoma tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece,
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece,
| | - Christina Nikolaou
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Maximos Frountzas
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Bellos
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Angeliki Papapanagiotou
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|