ESGO/ESTRO quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) has previously defined and established a list of quality indicators for the surgical treatment of cervical cancer. As a continuation of this effort to improve overall quality of care for cervical cancer patients across all aspects, ESGO and the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) initiated the development of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a list of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice by giving to practitioners and administrators a quantitative basis to improve care and organizational processes, notably for recognition of the increased complexity of modern external radiotherapy and brachytherapy techniques.

METHODS

Quality indicators were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for identification of potential quality indicators and documentation of scientific evidence, consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians (n = 99).

RESULTS

Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are detailed to define how the quality indicators will be measured in practice. Targets were also defined for specifying the level which each unit or center should be aiming to achieve. Nineteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were defined. Quality indicators 1-6 are general requirements related to pretreatment workup, time to treatment, upfront radiation therapy, and overall management, including active participation in clinical research and the decision making process within a structured multidisciplinary team. Quality indicators 7-17 are related to treatment indicators. Quality indicators 18 and 19 are related to patient outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This set of quality indicators is a major instrument to standardize the quality of radiation therapy in cervical cancer. A scoring system combining surgical and radiotherapeutic quality indicators will be developed within an envisaged future ESGO accreditation process for the overall management of cervical cancer, in an effort to support institutional and governmental quality assurance programs.

ESGO/ESTRO quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) has previously defined and established a list of quality indicators for the surgical treatment of cervical cancer. As a continuation of this effort to improve overall quality of care for cervical cancer patients across all aspects, ESGO and the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) initiated the development of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a list of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice by giving to practitioners and administrators a quantitative basis to improve care and organizational processes, notably for recognition of the increased complexity of modern external radiotherapy and brachytherapy techniques.

METHODS

Quality indicators were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for identification of potential quality indicators and documentation of scientific evidence, consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians (n=99).

RESULTS

Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are detailed to define how the quality indicators will be measured in practice. Targets were also defined for specifying the level which each unit or center should be aiming to achieve. Nineteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were defined. Quality indicators 1-6 are general requirements related to pretreatment workup, time to treatment, upfront radiation therapy, and overall management, including active participation in clinical research and the decision making process within a structured multidisciplinary team. Quality indicators 7-17 are related to treatment indicators. Quality indicators 18 and 19 are related to patient outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This set of quality indicators is a major instrument to standardize the quality of radiation therapy in cervical cancer. A scoring system combining surgical and radiotherapeutic quality indicators will be developed within an envisaged future ESGO accreditation process for the overall management of cervical cancer, in an effort to support institutional and governmental quality assurance programs.

Association of persistent morbidity after radiotherapy with quality of life in locally advanced cervical cancer survivors

PURPOSE

To quantify the association of persistent morbidity with different aspects of quality of life (QOL) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) survivors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Longitudinal outcome from the EMBRACE-I study was evaluated. Patient-reported symptoms and QOL were prospectively scored (EORTC-C30/CX24) at baseline and regular follow-ups. Physician-assessed symptoms were also reported (CTCAEv.3). Persistent symptoms were defined if present in at least half of the follow-ups. QOL items were linearly transformed into a continuous scale. Linear mixed-effects models (LMM) were applied to evaluate and quantify the association of persistent symptoms with QOL. Overall QOL deterioration was evaluated by calculating the integral difference in QOL over time obtained with LMM for patients without and with persistent symptoms.

RESULTS

Out of 1416 patients enrolled, 741 with baseline and ≥ 3 late follow-ups were analyzed (median 59 months). Proportions of persistent EORTC symptoms ranged from 21.8 % to 64.9 % (bowel control and tiredness). For CTCAE the range was 11.3-28.6 % (limb edema and fatigue). Presence of any persistent symptom was associated with QOL, although with varying magnitude. Role functioning and Global health/QOL were the most impaired aspects. Fatigue and pain showed large differences, with reductions of around 20 % for most of the QOL aspects. Among organ-related symptoms, abdominal cramps showed the largest effect.

CONCLUSION

Persistent symptoms are associated with QOL reductions in LACC survivors. Organ-related symptoms showed smaller differences than general symptoms such as fatigue and pain. In addition to optimizing treatment to minimize organ-related morbidity, effort should be directed towards a more comprehensive and targeted morbidity management.

Overall Severe Morbidity After Chemo-Radiation Therapy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results From the EMBRACE-I Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate overall severe late morbidity (grade ≥3) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemo-radiation therapy and magnetic resonance image guided adaptive brachytherapy within the prospective EMBRACE-I study, and to compare the results with published literature after standard radiograph based brachytherapy (BT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2008 to 2015 the EMBRACE-I study enrolled 1416 patients. Morbidity was assessed (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0) every 3 months the 1st year, every 6 months the second and third year, and yearly thereafter and 1251 patients had available follow-up on late morbidity. Morbidity events (grade 3-5) were summarized as the maximum grade during follow-up (crude incidence rates) and actuarial estimates at 3 and 5 years. To compare with the published literature on standard radiograph based BT, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scores from the EMBRACE-I study were retrospectively converted into a corresponding score in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer system.

RESULTS

In total, 534 severe events occurred in 270 patients; 429 events were grade 3 and 105 were grade 4 events. Actuarial estimates for grade ≥3 gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), vaginal and fistula events at 5 years were 8.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9%-10.6%), 6.8% (95% CI, 5.4%-8.6%), 5.7% (95% CI, 4.3%-7.6%), and 3.2% (95% CI, 2.2%-4.5%), respectively. The 5-year actuarial estimate for organ-related events (GI, GU, vaginal, or fistula) was 18.4% (95% CI, 16.0%-21.2%). The 5-year actuarial estimate when aggregating all G≥3 endpoints (GI, GU, vaginal, fistulas, and non-GI/GU/vaginal) was 26.6% (95% CI, 23.8%-29.6%). Thirteen patients had a treatment-related death, 8 of which were associated with GI morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

This report assesses severe morbidity from the largest prospective study on chemo-radiation therapy and image guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer to date. Severe late morbidity was limited per endpoint and organ category, but considerable when aggregated across organs and all endpoints. The late morbidity results in the EMBRACE-I study compare favorably with published literature on standard radiograph based BT for GI morbidity, vaginal morbidity, and fistulas.

Risk Factors for Local Failure Following Chemoradiation and Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results From the EMBRACE-I Study

PURPOSE

To report clinical and treatment characteristics, remission and failure patterns, and risk factors for local failure (LF) from the EMBRACE-I study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EMBRACE-I was a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study on magnetic resonance imaging-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (MR-IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer. Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy, concurrent chemotherapy, and MR-IGABT. LF was defined as progressive or recurrent disease in the cervix, uterus, parametria, pelvic wall, or vagina. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate local tumor control (LC) and Cox proportional regression models for multivariable analysis and dose-response analysis.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred eighteen patients with a median follow-up of 52 months were available for this analysis. Eighty-one patients had persistent disease 3 months after end of treatment. Of those, 60 patients achieved LC at 6-9 months without further treatment, whereas 21 patients had progressive disease. In addition, 77 patients developed a local recurrence after complete remission comprising a total number of 98 LFs. LFs were located inside the MR-IGABT target volumes in 90% of patients with LF. In multivariable analysis, histology, minimal dose to 90% of high-risk clinical target volume (CTV_HR), maximum tumor dimension, CTV_HR > 45 cm³, overall treatment time, tumor necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis, uterine corpus infiltration at diagnosis and at MR-IGABT, and mesorectal infiltration at MR-IGABT had significant impact on LF. Dose-response analysis showed that a minimal dose to 90% of 85 Gy to the CTV_HR led to 95% (95% CI, 94 to 97) LC 3 years postintervention for squamous cell in comparison to 86% (95% CI, 81 to 90) for adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma histology.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates the safety and validity of the GYN GEC-ESTRO/ICRU-89 target concept and provides large-scale evidence for dose prescription and new risk factors for LF in MR-IGABT in locally advanced cervical cancer.

22nd meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO 2021) report

This is a report from the 22nd Meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, held October 23-25, 2021. The 3-day event offered an educational experience covering the major scientific and clinical advances in gynecological oncology. The Congress program included different session formats, including guidelines updates and state-of-the-art lectures. This article provides an overview of the main Congress activities as well as of the most important studies that were presented at the event for the first time.

Prognostic Implications of Uterine Cervical Cancer Regression During Chemoradiation Evaluated by the T-Score in the Multicenter EMBRACE I Study

PURPOSE

A simple scoring system (T-score, TS) for integrating findings from clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the primary tumor at diagnosis has shown strong prognostic capability for predicting local control and survival in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation and MRI-guided brachytherapy (BT). The aim was to validate the performance of TS using the multicenter EMBRACE I study and to evaluate the prognostic implications of TS regression obtained during initial chemoradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

EMBRACE I recruited 1416 patients, of whom 1318 were available for TS. Patients were treated with chemoradiation followed by MRI-guided BT. A ranked ordinal scale of 0 to 3 points was used to assess 8 anatomic locations typical for local invasion of cervical cancer. TS was calculated separately at diagnosis (TSD) and at BT (TSBT) by the sum of points obtained from the 8 locations at the 2 occasions.

RESULTS

Median TSD and TSBT was 5 and 4, respectively. TS regression was observed in 71% and was an explanatory variable for BT technique (intracavitary vs intracavitary/interstitial) and major dose-volume histogram parameters for BT, such as high-risk clinical target (CTVHR), CTVHR D90 (minimal dose to 90% of the target volume), D2cm3 bladder (minimal dose to the most exposed 2 cm3 of the bladder), and D2cm3 rectum. TS regression (TSBT≤5) was associated with improved local control and survival and with less morbidity compared with patients with TSBT remaining high (>5) despite initial chemoradiation. TS regression was significant in multivariate analysis for both local control and survival when analyzed in consort with already established prognostic parameters related to the patient, disease, and treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

TS was validated in a multicenter setting and proven to be a strong multidisciplinary platform for integration of clinical findings and imaging with the ability to quantitate local tumor regression and its prognostic implications regarding BT technique, dose-volume histogram parameters, local control, survival, and morbidity.

Role of Brachytherapy in the Postoperative Management of Endometrial Cancer: Decision-Making Analysis among Experienced European Radiation Oncologists

Simple Summary

There are various society-specific guidelines addressing adjuvant brachytherapy (BT) after surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). However, these recommendations are not uniform. Against this background, clinicians need to make decisions despite gaps between best scientific evidence and clinical practice. We analysed decision criteria influencing the selection for adjuvant radiotherapy among European radiation oncology experts. For this, GEC-ESTRO provided 19 European radiation oncology experts on gynaecological brachytherapy for decision-making analyses. The manuscript presents patterns in decision-making among these experts and demonstrates areas of consensus/discrepancies. We also analysed dose prescription and techniques of brachytherapy. This analysis is of special value as the objective approach enabled us to obtain an unbiased description of decision-making among the specialists (the study was not aimed to create or enforce a consensus). The manuscript provides valuable insight into clinical decision-making with a high impact on treatment selection, as expected differences between experts were observed. With this manuscript we are able to visualize and quantify these. This information is relevant for interdisciplinary discussions.

Abstract

Background: There are various society-specific guidelines addressing adjuvant brachytherapy (BT) after surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). However, these recommendations are not uniform. Against this background, clinicians need to make decisions despite gaps between best scientific evidence and clinical practice. We explored factors influencing decision-making for adjuvant BT in clinical routine among experienced European radiation oncologists in the field of gynaecological radiotherapy (RT). We also investigated the dose and technique of BT. Methods: Nineteen European experts for gynaecological BT selected by the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology provided their decision criteria and technique for postoperative RT in EC. The decision criteria were captured and converted into decision trees, and consensus and dissent were evaluated based on the objective consensus methodology. Results: The decision criteria used by the experts were tumour extension, grading, nodal status, lymphovascular invasion, and cervical stroma/vaginal invasion (yes/no). No expert recommended adjuvant BT for pT1a G1-2 EC without substantial LVSI. Eighty-four percent of experts recommended BT for pT1a G3 EC without substantial LVSI. Up to 74% of experts used adjuvant BT for pT1b LVSI-negative and pT2 G1–2 LVSI-negative disease. For 74–84% of experts, EBRT + BT was the treatment of choice for nodal-positive pT2 disease and for pT3 EC with cervical/vaginal invasion. For all other tumour stages, there was no clear consensus for adjuvant treatment. Four experts already used molecular markers for decision-making. Sixty-five percent of experts recommended fractionation regimens of 3 × 7 Gy or 4 × 5 Gy for BT as monotherapy and 2 × 5 Gy for combination with EBRT. The most commonly used applicator for BT was a vaginal cylinder; 82% recommended image-guided BT. Conclusions: There was a clear trend towards adjuvant BT for stage IA G3, stage IB, and stage II G1–2 LVSI-negative EC. Likewise, there was a non-uniform pattern for BT dose prescription but a clear trend towards 3D image-based BT. Finally, molecular characteristics were already used in daily decision-making by some experts under the pretext that upcoming trials will bring more clarity to this topic.

Risk factors for nodal failure after radiochemotherapy and image guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: An EMBRACE analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess risk factors for nodal failure (NF) after definitive (chemo)radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) for patients treated in the EMBRACE I study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for pelvic NF and para-aortic (PAO) NF (NF_PAO) were analysed. After multiple imputation, univariable and multivariable Cox-regression was performed for clinical and treatment-related variables. For patients with affected pelvic nodes but no PAO nodes at diagnosis, additional analyses were performed for two subgroups: 1. 'small pelvis' nodes in internal and external iliac, obturator, parametrial, presacral and/or common iliac (CI) region and 2. any CI nodes (subgroup of 1).

RESULTS

1338 patients with 152 NF and 104 NF_PAO events were analysed with a median follow-up of 34.2 months (IQR 16.4-52.7). For the entire group, larger tumour width, nodal risk groups (in particular any CI nodes without PAO nodes), local failure, and lower Hb-nadir increased the risk of NF. Elective PAO-irradiation was independently associated with a decreased risk of NF_PAO (HR 0.53, 95%-CI 0.28-1.00, p = 0.05). For subgroup 1, having 'any CI nodes without PAO nodes' and local failure significantly increased NF risk. Additionally, elective PAO-irradiation was associated with less risk of NF_PAO (HR 0.38, 95%-CI 0.17-0.86, p = 0.02). For subgroup 2 only local failure was associated with higher risk of NF.

CONCLUSION

In this patient cohort, nodal disease and tumour width at diagnosis, as well as local failure, are risk factors for NF after definitive treatment. Having either 'any PAO nodes' (with or without pelvic nodes) or 'any CI nodes' (without PAO nodes) are stronger risk factors than involvement of nodes in the small pelvis alone. Elective PAO-irradiation was associated with significantly less NF_PAO, particularly in patients with nodal disease in the 'small pelvis' and/or CI region at time of diagnosis.

MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The concept of the use of MRI for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer was introduced 20 years ago. Here, we report on EMBRACE-I, which aimed to evaluate local tumour control and morbidity after chemoradiotherapy and MRI-based IGABT.

METHODS

EMBRACE-I was a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study. Data from patients from 24 centres in Europe, Asia, and North America were prospectively collected. The inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years, with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix, The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB-IVA disease or FIGO stage IVB disease restricted to paraaortic lymph metastasis below the L1-L2 interspace, suitable for curative treatment. Treatment consisted of chemoradiotherapy (weekly intravenous cisplatin 40 mg/m2, 5-6 cycles, 1 day per cycle, plus 45-50 Gy external-beam radiotherapy delivered in 1·8-2 Gy fractions) followed by MRI-based IGABT. The MRI-based IGABT target volume definition and dose reporting was according to Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie European Society for Radiation Oncology recommendations. IGABT dose prescription was open according to institutional practice. Local control and late morbidity were selected as primary endpoints in all patients available for analysis. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00920920.

FINDINGS

Patient accrual began on July 30, 2008, and closed on Dec 29, 2015. A total of 1416 patients were registered in the database. After exclusion for not meeting patient selection criteria before treatment, being registered but not entered in the database, meeting the exclusion criteria, and being falsely excluded, data from 1341 patients were available for analysis of disease and data from 1251 patients were available for assessment of morbidity outcome. MRI-based IGABT including dose optimisation was done in 1317 (98·2%) of 1341 patients. Median high-risk clinical target volume was 28 cm3 (IQR 20-40) and median minimal dose to 90% of the clinical target volume (D90%) was 90 Gy (IQR 85-94) equi-effective dose in 2 Gy per fraction. At a median follow-up of 51 months (IQR 20-64), actuarial overall 5-year local control was 92% (95% CI 90-93). Actuarial cumulative 5-year incidence of grade 3-5 morbidity was 6·8% (95% CI 5·4-8·6) for genitourinary events, 8·5% (6·9-10·6) for gastrointestinal events, 5·7% (4·3-7·6) for vaginal events, and 3·2% (2·2-4·5) for fistulae.

INTERPRETATION

Chemoradiotherapy and MRI-based IGABT result in effective and stable long-term local control across all stages of locally advanced cervical cancer, with a limited severe morbidity per organ. These results represent a positive breakthrough in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, which might be used as a benchmark for clinical practice and all future studies.

FUNDING

Medical University of Vienna, Aarhus University Hospital, Elekta AB, and Varian Medical Systems.

Risk factors and dose-effects for bladder fistula, bleeding and cystitis after radiotherapy with imaged-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer: An EMBRACE analysis

PURPOSE

To identify patient- and treatment-related risk factors for fistula, bleeding, cystitis, pain and difficulty in voiding in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with radio(chemo)therapy and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Morbidity within the EMBRACE-I study was prospectively reported for physician-assessed (CTCAE) fistula, bleeding and cystitis and patient-reported (EORTC) pain and difficulty in voiding. Analysis of risk factors was performed in patients without bladder infiltration. Risk factors were tested with Cox regression for grade (G) ≥ 3 cystitis, for G ≥ 2 fistula, bleeding and cystitis, and for EORTC "very much" and "quite a bit" or worse.

RESULTS

Of 1416 patients enrolled, 1153 and 884 patients without bladder infiltration were evaluable for the analysis of CTCAE and EORTC items, respectively. Median follow-up was 48[3-120] months. Crude incidence rates for G ≥ 2 fistula, bleeding and cystitis were 0.7%, 2.7% and 8.8%, respectively, and 16% and 14% for "quite a bit" or worse pain and difficulty in voiding, respectively. Baseline urinary morbidity and overweight/obesity were significant risk factors for most endpoints. Bladder D_2cm3 correlated with G ≥ 2 fistula, bleeding and cystitis, while ICRU bladder point dose correlated with EORTC pain "quite a bit" or worse. An increase from 75 Gy to 80 Gy in bladder D_2cm3 resulted in an increase from 8% to 13% for 4-year actuarial estimate of G ≥ 2 cystitis.

CONCLUSION

Clinical and treatment-related risk factors for bladder fistula, bleeding and cystitis were identified within a prospective and multi-institutional setting. A dose-effect was established with bladder D_2cm3, reinforcing the importance of continued optimization during individualized IGABT planning.

Perspectives, fears and expectations of patients with gynaecological cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Pan-European study of the European Network of Gynaecological Cancer Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe)

Background

The impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on European gynaecological cancer patients under active treatment or follow‐up has not been documented. We sought to capture the patient perceptions of the COVID‐19 implications and the worldwide imposed treatment modifications.

Methods

A patient survey was conducted in 16 European countries, using a new COVID‐19‐related questionnaire, developed by ENGAGe and the Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale questionnaire (HADS). The survey was promoted by national patient advocacy groups and charitable organisations.

Findings

We collected 1388 forms; 592 online and 796 hard‐copy (May, 2020). We excluded 137 due to missing data. Median patients’ age was 55 years (range: 18–89), 54.7% had ovarian cancer and 15.5% were preoperative. Even though 73.2% of patients named cancer as a risk factor for COVID‐19, only 17.5% were more afraid of COVID‐19 than their cancer condition, with advanced age (>70 years) as the only significant risk factor for that. Overall, 71% were concerned about cancer progression if their treatment/follow‐up was cancelled/postponed. Most patients (64%) had their care continued as planned, but 72.3% (n = 892) said that they received no information around overall COVID‐19 infection rates of patients and staff, testing or measures taken in their treating hospital. Mean HADS Anxiety and Depression Scores were 8.8 (range: 5.3–12) and 8.1 (range: 3.8–13.4), respectively. Multivariate analysis identified high HADS‐depression scores, having experienced modifications of care due to the pandemic and concern about not being able to visit their doctor as independent predictors of patients’ anxiety.

Interpretation

Gynaecological cancer patients expressed significant anxiety about progression of their disease due to modifications of care related to the COVID‐19 pandemic and wished to pursue their treatment as planned despite the associated risks. Healthcare professionals should take this into consideration when making decisions that impact patients care in times of crisis and to develop initiatives to improve patients’ communication and education.

Importance of the ICRU bladder point dose on incidence and persistence of urinary frequency and incontinence in locally advanced cervical cancer: An EMBRACE analysis

PURPOSE

To identify patient- and treatment-related risk factors and dose-effects for urinary frequency and incontinence in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with radio(chemo)therapy and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Physician-assessed (CTCAE) and patient-reported (EORTC) frequency and incontinence recorded in the EMBRACE-I study were analysed. Risk factors analysis was performed in patients without bladder infiltration and with baseline morbidity available. Cox regression was used for CTCAE grade (G) ≥ 3 and G ≥ 2 and for EORTC "very much" and "quite a bit" or worse. Logistic regression was used for late persistent morbidity defined when CTCAE G ≥ 1 or EORTC ≥ "quite a bit" were scored in at least half of follow-ups.

RESULTS

Longitudinal data on 1153 and 884 patients were available for CTCAE and EORTC analysis, respectively. Median follow-up was 48[3-120] months. Crude incidence rates of G≥2 were 13% and 11% for frequency and incontinence, respectively. Baseline morbidity and overweight-obesity were risk factors for both symptoms. Elderly patients were at higher risk for incontinence. Patients receiving conformal-radiotherapy were at higher risk for frequency. ICRU bladder point (ICRU-BP) dose was a stronger predictor for incontinence than bladder D_2cm3. The 5-year actuarial estimate of G ≥ 2 incontinence increased from 11% to 20% with ICRU-BP doses > 75 Gy compared to ≤ 65 Gy. Frequency showed weaker associations with dose.

CONCLUSION

ICRU-BP dose, in addition to clinical parameters, is a risk factor for urinary incontinence and shows a dose-effect after radio(chemo)therapy and IGABT. ICRU-BP dose should be monitored during treatment planning alongside volumetric parameters. Frequency seems associated with larger irradiated volumes.

Brachytherapy versus cystectomy in solitary bladder cancer: a case control, multicentre, East-Netherlands study

PURPOSE

Comparing the outcome of surgery and brachytherapy-based radiotherapy in patients with solitary T1G3/T2 bladder tumour in, a retrospective case-control study, because efforts for a randomised clinical trial comparing these modalities have failed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cystectomy group. Patients were selected using the pathological registration system (PALGA). 289 cases of TURT followed by cystectomy, indicated by a muscle--invading bladder tumour were performed in three East-Netherlands medical centres between 1991 and 2001. Out of this group 179 patients with clinical T2N0M0 bladder tumour were selected. All the consecutive files were analysed by a urologist and a radiation oncologist and 65 of those patients (mean age 63.7 years) would have been eligible for brachytherapy, based on an initial analysis: cystoscopy estimated tumour size, post-TURT pathological report, completed by CT-scan and/or, MRI-scan. A final pathological report after radical cystectomy was not considered for patients' selection. Brachytherapy group. Patients were selected using a prospective registration study aiming at determination of our treatment results. 89 Patients (mean age 68.4 years) underwent TURT followed by a course of external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy from 1983 till 2005 in the Arnhem Radiotherapy Institute.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the brachytherapy group was 5.7 years (range 0.2-21.4 years), for the cystectomy group was 5.05 years (range: 0.04-16.8 years). No difference in disease-specific survival (DSS) could be detected with a 5- and 10-year DSS of 71% and 66% in the brachytherapy group and 60% and 57% in the cystectomy group, respectively. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 57% in the brachytherapy group and 52% in the cystectomy group, however, the 10-year OS was better in the cystectomy than in the brachytherapy group (42% and 33%, respectively). This is caused by the significant age difference in favour of the cystectomy group. Cystectomy-free survival in the brachytherapy group was 70%.

CONCLUSION

Radical cystectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. However, in a selected patient population a bladder sparing treatment, i.e. a combination of transurethral tumour resection (TURT), external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy, can be applied successfully. This concerns a solitary, T1G3 or T2 bladder tumour, with a diameter<5 cm.

Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the rates of local control and survival after relapse in patients with stage I endometrial cancer treated in the multicenter randomized PORTEC trial.

METHODS

The PORTEC trial included 715 patients with stage 1 endometrial cancer, either grade 1 or 2 with deep (>50%) myometrial invasion or grade 2 or 3 with <50% invasion. In all cases an abdominal hysterectomy was performed, without lymphadenectomy. After surgery, patients were randomized to receive pelvic RT (46 Gy) or no further treatment.

RESULTS

The analysis was done by intention-to-treat. A total of 714 patients were evaluated. At a median follow-up of 73 months, 8-year actuarial locoregional recurrence rates were 4% in the RT group and 15% in the control group (P < 0.0001). The 8-year actuarial overall survival rates were 71 (RT group) and 77% (control group, P = 0.18). Eight-year rates of distant metastases were 10 and 6% (P = 0.20). The majority of the locoregional relapses were located in the vagina, mainly in the vaginal vault. Of the 39 patients with isolated vaginal relapse, 35 (87%) were treated with curative intent, usually with external RT and brachytherapy, and surgery in some. A complete remission (CR) was obtained in 31 of the 35 patients (89%), and 24 patients (77%) were still in CR after further follow-up. Five patients subsequently developed distant metastases, and 2 had a second vaginal recurrence. The 3-year survival after first relapse was 51% for patients in the control group and 19% in the RT group (P = 0.004). The 3-year survival after vaginal relapse was 73%, in contrast to 8 and 14% after pelvic and distant relapse (P < 0.001). At 5 years, the survival after vaginal relapse was 65% in the control group compared to 43% in the RT group.

CONCLUSION

Survival after relapse was significantly better in the patient group without previous RT. Treatment for vaginal relapse was effective, with 89% CR and 65% 5-year survival in the control group, while there was no difference in survival between patients with pelvic relapse and those with distant metastases. As pelvic RT was shown to improve locoregional control significantly, but without a survival benefit, its use should be limited to those patients at sufficiently high risk (15% or over) for recurrence in order to maximize local control and relapse-free survival.