1
|
Franko J, Raman S, Patel S, Petree B, Lin M, Tee MC, Le VH, Frankova D. Survival and cancer recurrence after short-course perioperative probiotics in a randomized trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2024; 60:59-64. [PMID: 38479940 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The long-term impact of perioperative probiotics remains understudied while mounting evidence links microbiome and oncogenesis. Therefore, we analyzed overall survival and cancer recurrence among patients enrolled in a randomized trial of perioperative probiotics. METHODS 6-year follow-up of surgical patients participating in a randomized trial evaluating short-course perioperative oral probiotic VSL#3 (n = 57) or placebo (n = 63). RESULTS Study groups did not differ in age, preoperative hemoglobin, ASA status, and Charlson comorbidity index. There was a significant difference in preoperative serum albumin (placebo group 4.0 ± 0.1 vs. 3.7 ± 0.1 g/dL in the probiotic group, p = 0.030). Thirty-seven deaths (30.8 %) have occurred during a median follow-up of 6.2 years. Overall survival stratified on preoperative serum albumin and surgical specialty was similar between groups (p = 0.691). Age (aHR = 1.081, p = 0.001), serum albumin (aHR = 0.162, p = 0.001), and surgical specialty (aHR = 0.304, p < 0.001) were the only predictors of overall survival in the multivariate model, while the placebo/probiotic group (aHR = 0.808, p = 0.726) was not predictive. The progression rate among cancer patients was similar in the probiotic group (30.3 %, 10/33) compared to the placebo group (21.2 %, 7/33; p = 0.398). The progression-free survival was not significantly different (unstratified p = 0.270, stratified p = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative short-course use of VSL#3 probiotics does not influence overall or progression-free survival after complex surgery for visceral malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Franko
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA.
| | - Shankar Raman
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - Shiv Patel
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - Brandon Petree
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - Mayin Lin
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - May C Tee
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA; Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Viet H Le
- Department of Surgery, MercyOne Medical Center, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - Daniela Frankova
- Department of Internal Medicine, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu F, Zhang B, Xiang J, Zhuo G, Zhao Y, Zhou Y, Ding J. Does anastomotic leakage after intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer influence long-term outcomes? A retrospective observational study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:394. [PMID: 37816844 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03131-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether anastomotic leakage (AL) following intersphincteric resection (ISR) for ultralow rectal cancer (uLRC) is associated with long-term negative outcomes. METHODS Between June 2011 and January 2022, 236 consecutive patients who underwent ISR with diverting ileostomy for uLRC were included. The primary outcome was long-term clinical consequences of AL, including chronic stricture, stoma reversal, and oncological and functional results. RESULTS Forty-one (17.4%) patients developed symptomatic AL, whereas only two (0.8%) required re-laparotomy due to severe leakage. Patients with leaks had a significantly increased incidence of chronic stricture (29.3% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.001) and stoma non-reversal (34.1% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.0001) than controls. The severe consequences were particularly common in patients with anastomotic separation, resulting in 60% of those presenting with chronic stricture and 50% ending up with stoma non-reversal. After a median follow-up of 59 (range, 7-139) months, AL did not compromise long-term oncological outcomes, including tumor recurrence (9.8% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.3), 5-year disease-free, and overall survival (73.4% vs. 74.8% and 85.1% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.56 and P = 0.55). A total of 149 patients with bowel continuity who completed self-assessment questionnaires were enrolled for functional evaluation. The median follow-up was 24 (range, 12-94) months after ileostomy reversal, and functional results were comparable between patients with and without leaks. CONCLUSION AL is an unfortunate reality for patients who underwent ISR for uLRC, but the rate of severe leakage is limited. Leaks contribute to possible adverse impacts on chronic stricture and stoma non-reversal, especially for patients with anastomotic separation. However, long-term oncological and functional results may not be compromised. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chictr.org.cn identifier: ChiCTR-ONC-15007506 and ChiCTR2100051614.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feifan Liu
- Postgraduate Training Base of Jinzhou Medical University, the Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, 100088, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, 100088, China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, 100088, China
| | - Jianbin Xiang
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guangzuan Zhuo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, 100088, China
| | - Yujuan Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, 100088, China
| | - Yiming Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianhua Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, 100088, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prabhakaran S, Prabhakaran S, Lim WM, Guerra G, Heriot AG, Kong JC. Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: Predictive Factors and Survival. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2022; 95:56-64. [PMID: 38084042 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.1602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
<br><b>Introduction:</b> Anastomotic leak (AL) is a serious complication following colorectal surgery.</br> <br><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the development of AL and to analyze its impact on survival.</br> <br><b>Materials and methods:</b> All consecutive adult colorectal cancer resections performed between 2007 and 2020 with curative intent and anastomosis formation were included from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome measure was the rate of AL. The secondary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival (OS).</br> <br><b>Results:</b> There were 6837 eligible patients. The rate of AL was 2.2% and 4.0% in patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively. AL was a significant independent predictor of reduced 5-year OS in patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer (odds ratio 2.293, p = 0.009). Emergency surgery (p = 0.015), surgery at a public hospital (p = 0.002), and an open surgical approach (p = 0.021) were all associated with a significantly higher risk of AL in patients with colon cancer, with higher rates of AL noted in left colectomies as compared to right hemicolectomies (4.4% <i>vs.</i> 1.3%, p < 0.001). In rectal cancer patients, AL was associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.038) and male gender (p = 0.002). The anastomosis formation technique (hand-sewn <i>vs.</i> stapled) did not impact the rate of AL (p = 0.116 and p = 0.198 with colon and rectal cancer, respectively).</br> <br><b>Discussion:</b> Clinicians should be cognizant of the predictive factors for AL and should consider early intervention for at-risk patients.</br>.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sowmya Prabhakaran
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wei Mou Lim
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia The Sir Peter MacCallum Centre Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Glen Guerra
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia The Sir Peter MacCallum Centre Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joseph C Kong
- Division of Cancer Surgery Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bao QR, Crimì F, Valotto G, Chiminazzo V, Bergamo F, Prete AA, Galuppo S, El Khouzai B, Quaia E, Pucciarelli S, Urso EDL. Obesity may not be related to pathologic response in locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:994444. [PMID: 36249024 PMCID: PMC9556820 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.994444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between body mass index (BMI) and body fat composition (measured with radiological fat parameters (RFP)) and pathological response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients. The secondary aim of the study was to assess the role of BMI and RFP on major surgical complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Methods All patients who underwent surgical resection following nCRT between 2005 and 2017 for mid-low rectal cancer were retrospectively collected. Visceral fat area (VFA), superficial fat area (SFA), visceral/superficial fat area ratio (V/S), perinephric fat thickness (PNF), and waist circumference (WC) were estimated by baseline CT scan. Predictors of pathologic response and postoperative complications were investigated using logistic regression analysis. The correlations between BMI and radiologic fat parameters and survival were investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results Out of 144 patients included, a complete (TRG1) and major (TRG1+2) pathologic response was reported in 32 (22%) and 60 (45.5%) cases, respectively. A statistically significant correlation between BMI and all the RFP was found. At a median follow-up of 60 (35-103) months, no differences in terms of OS and DFS were found considering BMI and radiologic fat parameters. At univariable analysis, neither BMI nor radiologic fat parameters were predictors of complete or major pathologic response; nevertheless, VFA, V/S>1, and BMI were predictors of postoperative major complications. Conclusions We found no associations between BMI and body fat composition and pathological response to nCRT, although VFA, V/S, and BMI were predictors of major complications. BMI and RFP are not related to worse long-term OS and DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quoc Riccardo Bao
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical- Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy,*Correspondence: Quoc Riccardo Bao,
| | - Filippo Crimì
- Institute of Radiology - Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Giovanni Valotto
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical- Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Valentina Chiminazzo
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesca Bergamo
- Unit of Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Sara Galuppo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Badr El Khouzai
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Emilio Quaia
- Institute of Radiology - Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Salvatore Pucciarelli
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical- Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Emanuele Damiano Luca Urso
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical- Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|