[Family companions. New facets in accompanying relatives caring for people with dementia]

A Systematic Review of Home-Setting Psychoeducation Interventions for Behavioral Changes in Dementia: Some Lessons for the COVID-19 Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Assistance

BACKGROUND

Impacts of social isolation measures imposed by COVID-19 Pandemic on mental health and quality of life of older adults living with dementia and their caregivers remain unexplored. Studies have shown that psychoeducational and psychosocial interventions can manage behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) and reduce the emotional burden on family members when applied in home-setting scenarios.

METHOD

a comprehensive systematic review of useful interventions for easing the BPSD burden in patients with dementia (PwD) and their caregivers in the context of COVID-19 quarantine was performed from January 2010 to March 2020.

RESULTS

From a total of 187 articles retrieved from electronic databases (MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane and SCOPUS), 43 studies were eligible for this review. Most of the psychosocial and psychoeducational interventions described were person-centered strategies based on the cognitive-behavioral approach or informational tools to enhance care providers' knowledge of dementia. Most studies achieved successful results in handling BPSD and mood-anxiety symptoms of care providers, contributing to an overall improvement in dyad life quality.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from the last few years suggest that low-cost techniques, tailored to the dyad well-being, with increasing use of technology through friendly online platforms and application robots, can be an alternative to conventional assistance during COVID-19 Pandemic. Nevertheless, the world's current experience regarding the duration of the COVID-19 Pandemic and its effects on the cognition, behavior, and life quality of PwD will demand research on preventive and protective factors of dementia and the pursue of efficient interventions in different scenarios.

Overestimation of hours dedicated to family caregiving of persons with heart failure

AIMS

The aim of this study is to profile the family caregivers of people living with heart failure, to determine the perceived and real time devoted to daily care and to identify the factors associated with caregivers' overestimation of time dedicated to care.

BACKGROUND

The time spent by family caregivers on daily care is related to overload, but there are differences between real and perceived time spent. The reason for this difference is unknown, as is its impact on the caregiver.

DESIGN

Multicentre, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

This study forms part of a longitudinal, multicentre, ambispective cohort investigation. The study population was composed of 478 patient-family caregiver dyads and the data were collected over 2 years from 2014 - 2016.

RESULTS

The mean time perceived to be spent on daily care was 8.79 hr versus a real value of 4.41 hr. These values were positively correlated. A significant correlation was also found between the overestimation of hours spent and the age of the caregiver, the duration of the caregiving relationship and the number of people providing support and with the patient's level of dependence and self-care.

CONCLUSION

The overestimation of time dedicated to care seems to be related to patients' and caregivers' characteristics, such as functional status, caregiver burden, age and cohabitation. These patterns should be considered by nurses when carrying out assessment and care planning with these patients and their caregivers.

Supporting Families Living With Dementia in Rural Areas

BACKGROUND

Family members caring for persons with dementia are subject to multiple types of stress. Psychosocial help is recommended to lighten the emotional burden of care and can be of use in stabilizing the home-care situation. In this study conducted in rural areas in Germany, we tested whether volunteers with a special qualification for the assistance of families caring for dementia patients can support family members more effectively than conventional care companions.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled trial, 63 family members caring for persons with dementia were aided by specially qualified family companions (experimental intervention) or by conventional care companions (control intervention). The family members' quality of life was the primary endpoint and was evaluated at the end of the study in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis with t-tests. In an additional per-protocol (PP) analysis, differences that arose between groups at the outset of the study were accounted for. Secondary endpoints included reduced stress and better integration into the support system.

RESULTS

The ITT analysis revealed no differences between groups in healthrelated quality of life on either the emotional or the somatic scale. The PP analysis, however, showed that the experimental intervention improved the emotional health-related quality of life of the patients' family members compared to the control group. The effect strength was intermediate (d = 0.57; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

The difference between the findings of the PP and ITT analyses may be explained in part by the different distribution of severity of dementia in the two groups (experimental and control).