1
|
Meng G, McAiney C, McKillop I, Perlman CM, Tsao SF, Chen H. Factors That Influence Patient Satisfaction With the Service Quality of Home-Based Teleconsultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. JMIR Cardio 2024; 8:e51439. [PMID: 38363590 PMCID: PMC10907934 DOI: 10.2196/51439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ontario stroke prevention clinics primarily held in-person visits before the COVID-19 pandemic and then had to shift to a home-based teleconsultation delivery model using telephone or video to provide services during the pandemic. This change may have affected service quality and patient experiences. OBJECTIVE This study seeks to understand patient satisfaction with Ontario stroke prevention clinics' rapid shift to a home-based teleconsultation delivery model used during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research question explores explanatory factors affecting patient satisfaction. METHODS Using a cross-sectional service performance model, we surveyed patients who received telephone or video consultations at 2 Ontario stroke prevention clinics in 2021. This survey included closed- and open-ended questions. We used logistic regression and qualitative content analysis to understand factors affecting patient satisfaction with the quality of home-based teleconsultation services. RESULTS The overall response rate to the web survey was 37.2% (128/344). The quantitative analysis was based on 110 responses, whereas the qualitative analysis included 97 responses. Logistic regression results revealed that responsiveness (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.034, 95% CI 0.006-0.188; P<.001) and empathy (AOR 0.116, 95% CI 0.017-0.800; P=.03) were significant factors negatively associated with low satisfaction (scores of 1, 2, or 3 out of 5). The only characteristic positively associated with low satisfaction was when survey consent was provided by the substitute decision maker (AOR 6.592, 95% CI 1.452-29.927; P=.02). In the qualitative content analysis, patients with both low and high global satisfaction scores shared the same factors of service dissatisfaction (assurance, reliability, and empathy). The main subcategories associated with dissatisfaction were missing clinical activities, inadequate communication, administrative process issues, and absence of personal connection. Conversely, the high-satisfaction group offered more positive feedback on assurance, reliability, and empathy, as well as on having a competent clinician, appropriate patient selection, and excellent communication and empathy skills. CONCLUSIONS The insights gained from this study can be considered when designing home-based teleconsultation services to enhance patient experiences in stroke prevention care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangxia Meng
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Walterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Carrie McAiney
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Walterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Ian McKillop
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Walterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | | | - Shu-Feng Tsao
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Walterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Helen Chen
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Walterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Oppen JD, Conroy SP, Coats TJ, Mackintosh NJ, Valderas JM. Measuring health-related quality of life of older people with frailty receiving acute care: feasibility and psychometric performance of the EuroQol EQ-5D. BMC Emerg Med 2023; 23:137. [PMID: 37981703 PMCID: PMC10659073 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-023-00909-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although outcome goals for acute healthcare among older people living with frailty often include Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), current quality metrics usually focus on waiting times and survival. Lay and patient review have identified the EuroQol EQ-5D as a candidate measure for this setting. This research appraised the EQ-5D for feasibility, psychometric performance, and respondents' outcomes in the acute frailty setting. METHODS People aged 65 + with Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) 5-8 were recruited from eight UK hospitals' emergency care and acute admissions settings. They completed the five-level EQ-5D and the EQ-VAS. Feasibility was assessed with completion times and completeness. For reliability, response distributions and internal consistency were analysed. Finally, EQ-Index values were compared with demographic characteristics and service outcomes for construct validity. RESULTS The 232 participants were aged 65-102. 38% responded in emergency departments and 62% in admissions wards. Median completion time was 12 (IQR, 11) minutes. 98% responses were complete. EQ-5D had acceptable response distribution (SD 1.1-1.3) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.69). EQ-VAS demonstrated a midpoint response pattern. Median EQ-Index was 0.574 (IQR, 0.410) and was related positively with increasing age (p = 0.010) and negatively with CFS (p < 0.001). Participants with higher CFS had more frequent problems with mobility, self-care, and usual activities. CONCLUSIONS Administration of the EQ-5D was feasible in these emergency and acute frailty care settings. EQ-5D had acceptable properties, while EQ-VAS appeared problematic. Participants with more severe frailty had also poorer HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D van Oppen
- College of Life Sciences, George Davies Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
- Emergency and Specialist Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
| | - Simon P Conroy
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Timothy J Coats
- College of Life Sciences, George Davies Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Emergency and Specialist Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Nicola J Mackintosh
- College of Life Sciences, George Davies Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Jose M Valderas
- Department of Family Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Shaughnessy Í, Fitzgerald C, Whiston A, Harnett P, Whitty H, Mulligan D, Mullaney M, Devaney C, Lang D, Hardimann J, Condon B, Hayes C, Holmes A, Barry L, McCormack C, Bounds M, Robinson K, O'Connor M, Ryan D, Shchetkovsky D, Steed F, Carey L, Ahern E, Galvin R. Establishing the core elements of a frailty at the front door model of care using a modified real-time Delphi technique. BMC Emerg Med 2023; 23:123. [PMID: 37858041 PMCID: PMC10588204 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-023-00893-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in models of care for older adults living with frailty presenting to the emergency department (ED) have become a key priority for clinicians, researchers and policymakers due to the deleterious outcomes older adults experience due to prolonged exposure to such an environment. This study aimed to develop a set of expert consensus-based statements underpinning operational design, outcome measurement and evaluation of a Frailty at the Front Door (FFD) model of care for older adults within an Irish context. METHODS A modified real-time Delphi method was used. Facilitation of World Café focus groups with an expert panel of 86 members and seperate advisory groups with a Public and Patient Involvement panel of older adults and members of the Irish Association of Emergency Medicine generated a series of statements on the core elements of the FFD model of care. Statements were analysed thematically and incorporated into a real-time Delphi survey, which was emailed to members of the expert panel. Members were asked to rank 70 statements across nine domains using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus criteria were defined a priori and guided by previous research using 9-point rating scales. RESULTS Fifty members responded to the survey representing an overall response rate of 58%. Following analyses of the survey responses, the research team reviewed statements for content overlap and refined a final list of statements across the following domains: aims and objectives of the FFD model of care; target population; screening and assessment; interventions; technology; integration of care; evaluation and metrics; and research. CONCLUSION Development of a consensus derived FFD model of care represents an important step in generating national standards, implementation of a service model as intended and enhances opportunities for scientific impact. Future research should focus on the development of a core outcome set for studies involving older adults in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Íde O'Shaughnessy
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Christine Fitzgerald
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Aoife Whiston
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Patrick Harnett
- Clinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helen Whitty
- Clinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Des Mulligan
- Clinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marian Mullaney
- Clinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Catherine Devaney
- Clinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre Lang
- Clinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jennifer Hardimann
- Clinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brian Condon
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Christina Hayes
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Alison Holmes
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Louise Barry
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Claire McCormack
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Megan Bounds
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
| | - Katie Robinson
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Margaret O'Connor
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Department of Ageing and Therapeutics, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Damien Ryan
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Emergency Department, Limerick EM Education Research Training (ALERT), University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Denys Shchetkovsky
- Emergency Department, Limerick EM Education Research Training (ALERT), University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Fiona Steed
- Department of Health, Baggot Street, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Leonora Carey
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Emer Ahern
- Clinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rose Galvin
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Oppen J, Conroy S. Improving outcomes for older people with emergency care needs. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2023; 29:1-7. [PMID: 36989154 DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2022.0495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
This article describes work on emergency care for older people. It summarises patient experience in emergency care settings, the evidence base relating to improvement of outcomes and emerging interventions and describes tools that can support teams as they work on service improvement. Finally, it calls for the measurement of outcomes that matter to older people, as a mechanism to drive more person-centred approaches to emergency care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James van Oppen
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Simon Conroy
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pennestrì F, Banfi G. The Experience of Patients in Chronic Care Management: Applications in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Value for Public Health. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:9868. [PMID: 36011499 PMCID: PMC9408098 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19169868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Frail chronic patients consume the largest share of resources in advanced healthcare systems, with more hospitals waiting to receive them in the acute phase (awaiting paradigm) than there are effective public health interventions to keep them out of hospitals as much as possible. Effective chronic care management (CCM) requires organizational research as much as biomedical research (and, in some cases, perhaps more). Otherwise, excellent clinical care is wasted by poor coordination among professionals and institutions, with frail patients and their families paying the most expensive price. Comprehensive health technology assessment (HTA) procedures include organizational, social, and ethical dimensions to precisely capture the environmental factors that make medical interventions effective, accessible, and sustainable. Clinical outcomes and financial data are used extensively to evaluate care pathways from the providers' perspective, but much remains to be done to capture equally important indicators from the perspective of patients and society. The authors hypothesize that the ordinary use of patient-reported experience measurement (PREMs) in HTA can help reduce gaps and inequalities by identifying frail patients on time, curbing the risks of isolation and the burden on care givers, preventing complications and inappropriate emergency care use, improving adherence, health communication and behavior, supporting risk assessment, and relieving the frequency of the healthcare environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Pennestrì
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Banfi
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
- Scientific Direction, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A systematic review and recommendations for prom instruments for older people with frailty in emergency care. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:30. [PMID: 35362836 PMCID: PMC8975986 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00438-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The current service metrics used to evaluate quality in emergency care do not account for specific healthcare outcome goals for older people living with frailty. These have previously been classified under themes of ‘Autonomy’ and ‘Functioning’. There is no person-reported outcome measure (PROM) for older people with frailty and emergency care needs. This study aimed to identify and co-produce recommendations for instruments potentially suitable for use in this population.
Methods In this systematic review, we searched six databases for PROMs used between 2010 and 2021 by older people living with frailty receiving acute hospital care. Studies were reviewed against predefined eligibility criteria and appraised for quality using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Data were extracted to map instrument constructs against an existing framework of acute healthcare outcome goals. Instrument face and content validity were assessed by lay collaborators. Recommendations for instruments with potential emergency care suitability were formed through co-production. Results Of 9392 unique citations screened, we appraised the full texts of 158 studies. Nine studies were identified, evaluating nine PROMs. Quality of included studies ranged from ‘doubtful’ to ‘very good’. Most instruments had strong evidence for measurement properties. PROMs mainly assessed ‘Functioning’ constructs, with limited coverage of ‘Autonomy’. Five instruments were considered too burdensome for the emergency care setting or too specific for older people living with frailty. Conclusions Four PROMs were recommended as potentially suitable for further validation with older people with frailty and emergency care needs: COOP/WONCA charts, EuroQol, McGill Quality of Life (Expanded), and Palliative care Outcome Scale. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00438-x.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mooijaart SP, Carpenter CR, Conroy SP. Geriatric emergency medicine-a model for frailty friendly healthcare. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6550832. [PMID: 35307733 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
As the world's population continues to age over the decades ahead, medical educators and researchers in every adult medical and surgical specialty will need to 'geriatricise' their clinical science. Many have already engaged with geriatrics. Here we describe the progress that has been made and the opportunities ahead in the field of Geriatric Emergency Medicine (GEM), a field that has taken large steps in integrating holistic care. Future opportunities exist in the three domains of evidence-based medicine: including patient preferences and needs, generating scientific evidence, and improving physician knowledge and expertise. Implementation requires new innovations also in the organisation of care. Similar strategies may be useful in other fields of medicine, in making holistic care the standard for older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Christopher R Carpenter
- Emergency Care Research Core, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Simon P Conroy
- UCL MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL 5th Floor, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E7HB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Oppen JD, Coats TJ, Conroy SP, Lalseta J, Phelps K, Regen E, Riley P, Valderas JM, Mackintosh N. What matters most in acute care: an interview study with older people living with frailty. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:156. [PMID: 35216550 PMCID: PMC8880299 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-02798-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Healthcare outcome goals are central to person-centred acute care, however evidence among older people is scarce. Older people who are living with frailty have distinct requirements for healthcare delivery and have distinct risk for adverse outcomes from healthcare. There is insufficient evidence for whether those living with frailty also have distinct healthcare outcome goals. This study explored the nature of acute care outcome goals in people living with frailty. Methods Healthcare outcome goals were explored using semi-structured patient interviews. Participants aged over 65 with Clinical Frailty Score 5-8 (mild to very severe frailty) were recruited during their first 72 hours in a UK hospital. Purposive, maximum variation sampling was guided by lay partners from a Patient and Public Involvement Forum specialising in ageing-related research. Qualitative analysis used a blended approach based on framework and constant comparative methodologies for the identification of themes. Findings were validated through triangulation with participant, lay partner, and technical expert review. Results The 22 participants were aged 71 to 98 and had mild to very severe frailty. One quarter were living with dementia. Most participants had reflected on their situation and considered their outcome goals. Theme categories (and corresponding sub-categories) were ‘Autonomy’ (information, control, and security) and ‘Functioning’ (physical, psychosocial, and relief). A novel ‘security’ theme was identified, whereby participants sought to feel safe in their usual living place and with their health problems. Those living with milder frailty were concerned to maintain ability to support loved ones, while those living with most severe frailty were concerned about burdening others. Conclusions Outcome goals for acute care among older participants living with frailty were influenced by the insecurity of their situation and fear of deterioration. Patients may be supported to feel safe and in control through appropriate information provision and functional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James David van Oppen
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. .,Emergency & Specialist Medicine, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
| | - Timothy John Coats
- Emergency & Specialist Medicine, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.,Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Simon Paul Conroy
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jagruti Lalseta
- Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Older Persons Patient and Public Involvement Forum, Leicester, UK
| | - Kay Phelps
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Emma Regen
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Peter Riley
- Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Older Persons Patient and Public Involvement Forum, Leicester, UK
| | - Jose Maria Valderas
- Department of Family Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicola Mackintosh
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Busch JM, Arnold I, Kellett J, Brabrand M, Bingisser R, Nickel CH. Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency Patients. Int J Clin Pract 2022; 2022:7281693. [PMID: 36225535 PMCID: PMC9525775 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7281693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognostication is an important component of medical decision-making. A patients' general prognosis can be difficult to measure. The Simple Prognostic Score (SPS) was designed to include patients' age, mobility, aggregated vital signs, and the treating physician's decision to admit to aid prognostication. Study Aim. Our study aim is to validate the SPS, compare it with the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) regarding its prognostic performance, and test the interrater reliability of the subjective variable of the decision to admit. METHODS Over a period of 9 weeks all patients presenting to the ED were included, routinely interviewed, final disposition registered, and followed up for one year. The C-statistics of discrimination was used to compare SPS and ESI predictions of 7-day, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Youden J Statistics and Odds ratio, using logistical regression, were calculated for the Simple Prognostic Score. In a subset, a chart review was performed by senior physicians for a secondary assessment of the decision to admit. Interrater reliability was calculated using percentages and Cohens Kappa. RESULTS Out of 5648 patients, 3272 (57.9%) had a low SPS (i.e., ≤ 1); none of these patients died within 7 days, 2 (0.1%) died within 30 days after presentation and 19 (0.6%) died within a year. The area under the curve for 1-year mortality of the Simple Prognostic Score was 0.848. Secondary analysis of the interrater agreement for the decision to admit was 92%. CONCLUSION In a prospective study of unselected ED patients, the Simple Prognostic Score was validated as a reliable predictor of short- and long-term mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannette-Marie Busch
- Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Arnold
- Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - John Kellett
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of South West Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Brabrand
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Roland Bingisser
- Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian H. Nickel
- Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|