Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor-induced thrombocytopenia

Platelet Glycoprotein-Ib (GPIb) May Serve as a Bridge between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Atherosclerosis, Making It a Potential Target for Antiplatelet Agents in T2DM Patients

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a persistent metabolic condition that contributes to the development of cardiovascular diseases. Numerous studies have provided evidence that individuals with T2DM are at a greater risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, typically two to four times more likely than those without T2DM, mainly due to an increased risk of atherosclerosis. The rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque leading to pathological thrombosis is commonly recognized as a significant factor in advancing cardiovascular diseases caused by TD2M, with platelets inducing the impact of plaque rupture in established atherosclerosis and predisposing to the primary expansion of atherosclerosis. Studies suggest that individuals with T2DM have platelets that display higher baseline activation and reactivity than those without the condition. The expression enhancement of several platelet receptors is known to regulate platelet activation signaling, including platelet glycoprotein-Ib (GPIb). Furthermore, the high expression of platelet GP1b has been reported to increase the risk of platelet adhesion, platelet-leucocyte interaction, and thrombo-inflammatory pathology. However, the study exploring the role of GP1b in promoting platelet activation-induced cardiovascular diseases in T2DM patients is still limited. Therefore, we summarize the important findings regarding pathophysiological continuity between T2DM, platelet GPIb, and atherosclerosis and highlight the potential therapy targeting GPIb as a novel antiplatelet agent for preventing further cardiovascular incidents in TD2M patients.

Case report: reuse of tirofiban leads to very severe thrombocytopenia

Background

Telofiban is a class of small molecule non-peptide tyrosine derivatives containing RGD sequences. It is the only platelet surface glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist (GPI) currently marketed in China. In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) who receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a heavy thrombotic load, postoperative intravenous tirofiban can prevent complications of myocardial ischemia due to sudden coronary artery occlusion. With the increase in the clinical use of tirofiban, the number of adverse reactions related to thrombocytopenia induced by tirofiban has gradually increased. Still, most of them have thrombocytopenia after the first use. We report one case of very severe thrombocytopenia following the reuse of tirofiban.

Case summary

A 65-year-old man of Han nationality, 170 cm in height, 85 kg in weight, and 29.4 BMI, suffered from cerebral infarction 13 years ago and left with right limb movement disorder. Five days before this hospitalization, the patient underwent PCI, and three stents were implanted. After the operation, anti-platelet tirofiban and nadroparin calcium were given, and no thrombocytopenia was found. The patient still retains 80% stenosis due to anterior descending branches and plans to undergo PCI again half a month later. The patient with a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, and cerebral infarction usually took 100 mg of aspirin and 75 mg of clopidogrel, antiplatelet therapy, and had no history of food and drug allergy. One day after discharge, the patient suddenly felt chest tightness and wheezing. The laboratory showed hypersensitivity troponin 2.85 ng/ml (normal 0-0.0268 ng/ml), and the admission ECG showed ST-T changes in leads I, aVL, V5-V6. On the 6th day of hospitalization, PCI was performed, a stent was implanted in the proximal section of the anterior descending branch opening, and tirofiban(10 ug/kg, 3 min bolus, then 0.1 ug/kg/min) antiplatelet therapy was given after surgery. About 10 min after the tirofiban infusion, the patient suddenly shivered, accompanied by convulsions, accompanied by elevated body temperature (up to 39.4°C), accompanied by epistaxis and microscopic hematuria. An urgent blood test showed that the platelets dropped to 1 × 109/L, tirofiban and aspirin stopped immediately, and the antiplatelet therapy of clopidogrel was retained. After infusion of methylprednisolone sodium succinate and gamma globulin, the patient's platelets gradually recovered, and the patient was successfully discharged seven days later in stable condition.

Conclusion

This case is typical of severe thrombocytopenia caused by reusing tirofiban. This case may provide new insights into: 1. Patients who did not have thrombocytopenia after the first use of tirofiban may still have extremely severe thrombocytopenia after re-exposure to tirofiban. Routine platelet count monitoring and early identification of thrombocytopenia are the essential links. 2. Thrombocytopenia caused by re-exposure to tirofiban may have a faster onset, deeper degree, and slower recovery due to antibodies retained after the first exposure to tirofiban; 3. Platelet transfusions may not be necessary for patients with severe thrombocytopenia; 4. Immunosuppressants help suppress the body's immune response, promote platelet recovery, and can be reduced or discontinued when platelets rise and may be safe; 5. After tirofiban for PCI, continuing the maintenance dose of clopidogrel may be safe if the patient has no significant bleeding events.

Ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction in a patient with venous thromboembolism complicated by thrombocytopenia: A case report

A woman that suffered burns previously presented with leg swelling and was diagnosed with venous thromboembolism. Heparin was given until she suddenly developed myocardial infarction. Ventricular septal rupture was detected and managed by transcatheter closure. She developed massive bleeding and extensive thrombosis that made treatment paradoxical and eventually died.

Combined tumor necrosis factor-α (-308 G/A) and tumor necrosis factor-β (+ 252 A/G) nucleotide polymorphisms and chronicity in Egyptian children with immune thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a common autoimmune disorder. Secretion of TNF-α, TNF-β and IFN-γ plays a major role in the pathogenesis of ITP.

OBJECTIVE

This cross-sectional study aimed to detect TNF-α (-308 G/A) and TNF-β (+ 252 A/G) gene polymorphism in a cohort of Egyptian children with chronic ITP (cITP) to clarify their possible association with progression to chronic disease.

METHODS

The study included 80 Egyptian cITP patients and 100 unrelated age- and sex-matched controls. Genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP).

RESULTS

Patients with TNF-α homozygous (A/A) genotype had significantly higher mean age, longer disease duration and lower platelet counts (p values 0.005, 0.024 and 0.008, respectively). TNF-α wild (G/G) genotype was significantly more frequent among responders (p = 0.049). Complete response was more frequent among wild (A/A) TNF-β genotype patients (p = 0.011), and platelet count was significantly lower among homozygous (G/G) genotype (p = 0.018) patients. Combined polymorphisms were strongly associated with susceptibility to chronic ITP.

CONCLUSION

Homozygosity in either gene might contribute to a worse course of disease, increased severity and poor response to therapy. Patients expressing combined polymorphisms are more prone to progression to chronic disease, severe thrombocytopenia and longer disease duration.

Eptifibatide-induced acute profound thrombocytopenia: A case report

RATIONALE

Eptifibatide is an antiplatelet agent used in the medical management of acute coronary syndrome. Although multiple studies did not reveal a significant association between eptifibatide and the development of thrombocytopenia, recent case reports brought attention to this relatively rare side effect.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report a 61 years old male with acute coronary syndrome who underwent primary coronary intervention.

DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTION

The patient developed acute profound thrombocytopenia following eptifibatide administration. Following prompt offending drug discontinuation, the platelet counts recovered, without clinical sequelae or the need for platelet transfusion. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel was resumed after platelet count normalization.

OUTCOMES

The patient had a normal platelet count and no bleeding events on follow-up after three months upon discharge.

CONCLUSION

Eptifibatide, a glycoprotein IIa/IIIb inhibitor used in the management of acute coronary syndrome, can induce acute, profound thrombocytopenia that can have significant morbidity in patients. This case highlights this relatively rare side effect and the importance of monitoring blood counts and observing for any signs of bleeding or thrombosis that might occur in such patients.

Clinical pharmacology of antiplatelet drugs

INTRODUCTION

Platelets play a key role in arterial thrombosis and antiplatelet therapy is pivotal in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Current antiplatelet drugs target different pathways of platelet activation and show specific pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics, implicating clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the role of platelets in hemostasis and cardiovascular thrombosis, and discusses the key pharmacodynamics, drug-drug interactions and reversal strategies of clinically used antiplatelet drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Antiplatelet therapies target distinct pathways of platelet activation: thromboxane A₂ synthesis, adenosine diphosphate-mediated signaling, integrin α_IIbβ₃ (GPIIb/IIIa), thrombin-mediated platelet activation via the PAR1 receptor and phosphodiesterases. Key clinical drug-drug interactions of antiplatelet agents involve acetylsalicylic acid - ibuprofen, clopidogrel - omeprazole, and morphine - oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, all of which lead to an attenuated antiplatelet effect. Platelet function and genetic testing and the use of scores (ARC-HBR, PRECISE-DAPT, ESC ischemic risk definition) may contribute to a more tailored antiplatelet therapy. High on-treatment platelet reactivity presents a key problem in the acute management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A treatment strategy involving early initiation of an intravenous antiplatelet agent may be able to bridge the gap of insufficient platelet inhibition in high ischemic risk patients with STEMI.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for the neurointerventionalist

Antiplatelet therapies are commonly used in neurointerventional procedures. However, specific guidelines for their use in these settings is lacking and it can often be difficult to balance the potential risks and benefits of these medications. Considering the continued growth and adoption of neurointerventional procedures, it is crucial to understand the properties of these agents in order to use them safely. Large-scale clinical trials are still needed to clarify many of these aspects for this emerging field. However, the existing literature already provides insight into which antiplatelet drugs are of benefit to the neurointerventionalist as well as their associated risks of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. Hence, this review focuses on the applications of GPIIb/IIIA inhibitors to neurointerventional procedures.

Acute Profound Thrombocytopenia Induced by Eptifibatide Causing Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage

Background

Eptifibatide is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) receptor inhibitor which prevents platelet activation. The mechanism in which eptifibatide causes profound thrombocytopenia is poorly understood. One hypothesis suggests antibody-dependent pathways which cause thrombocytopenia upon subsequent reexposure to eptifibatide. This case reports acute profound thrombocytopenia (platelets < 20 × 10³/mm³) within 24 hours of administration. Alveolar hemorrhage occurred during a second eptifibatide infusion 5 days after initial asymptomatic eptifibatide treatment. Case Presentation. A 50-year-old male presenting with a STEMI was treated with eptifibatide during cardiac catheterization. Twelve hours posttreatment, the patient encountered profound thrombocytopenia and hemoptysis. The patient was briefly intubated for airway protection. The patient was stabilized after receiving platelet transfusion and fully recovered.

Conclusion

This is one of several cases reported on eptifibatide causing acute profound thrombocytopenia and subsequent alveolar hemorrhage. This case supports the theory in which antibodies contribute to eptifibatide-induced thrombocytopenia.

Novel antiplatelet targets in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are a global cause of mortality and morbidity that affect millions of lives worldwide. Following atherosclerotic plaque rupture, platelet activation and aggregation are the two major elements that initiate thrombus formation inside a coronary artery, which can obstruct blood flow and cause myocardial ischemia; ergo, antiplatelet therapy forms a major part of the treatment strategy for ACS. Patients with ACS routinely receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which consists of aspirin and a platelet P2Y₁₂ inhibitor to both treat and prevent atherothrombosis. Use of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors is now limited due to the risk of severe bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Thus, administration of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors is generally restricted to bail out thrombotic events associated with PCI. Furthermore, current antiplatelet medications mainly rely on thromboxane A₂ and P2Y₁₂ inhibition, which have broad-acting effects on platelets and are known to cause bleeding, which especially limits the long-term use of these agents. In addition, not all ACS patients treated with current antiplatelet treatments are protected from recurrence of arterial thrombosis, since many platelet mechanisms and activation pathways remain uninhibited by current antiplatelet therapy. Pharmacological antagonism of novel targets involved in platelet function could shape future antiplatelet therapies that could ultimately lead to more effective or safer therapeutic approaches. In this article, we focus on inhibitors of promising targets that have not yet been introduced into clinical practice, including inhibitors of GPVI, protease-activated receptor (PAR)-4, GPIb, 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtype 2A (5-HT_2A), protein disulfide isomerase, P-selectin and phosphoinositide 3-kinase β.

How I evaluate and treat thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit patient

Multiple causes (pseudothrombocytopenia, hemodilution, increased consumption, decreased production, increased sequestration, and immune-mediated destruction of platelets) alone or in combination make thrombocytopenia very common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Persisting thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients is associated with, but not causative of, increased mortality. Identification of the underlying cause is key for management decisions in individual patients. While platelet transfusion might be indicated in patients with impaired platelet production or increased platelet destruction, it could be deleterious in patients with increased intravascular platelet activation. Sepsis and trauma are the most common causes of thrombocytopenia in the ICU. In these patients, treatment of the underlying disease will also increase platelet counts. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requires alternative anticoagulation at a therapeutic dose and immune thrombocytopenia immunomodulatory treatment. Thrombocytopenia with symptomatic bleeding at or above World Health Organization grade 2 or planned invasive procedures are established indications for platelet transfusions, while the evidence for a benefit of prophylactic platelet transfusions is weak and controversial. If the platelet count does not increase after transfusion of 2 fresh ABO blood group-identical platelet concentrates (therapeutic units), ongoing platelet consumption and high-titer anti-HLA class I antibodies should be considered. The latter requires transfusion of HLA-compatible platelet concentrates.

The effect of in-hospital acquired thrombocytopenia on the outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In-hospital acquired thrombocytopenia (TP) is relatively common among patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, its effect on short-term and long-term outcomes has yet to be reviewed systematically.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies assessing the relationship between new-onset in-hospital TP and adverse outcomes among ACS patients. MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies published before March 20, 2016.

RESULTS

Ten studies reporting on a total of 142,161 ACS patients were identified. 8133 patients showed evidence of new-onset TP during the course of their hospitalization. Compared with patients with normal platelet counts, patients with new-onset TP had a prolonged in-hospital stay, significantly higher risk of both short-term mortality (<30days) (Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 5.58 [3.63-8.57]) and late death (6months to 1year) (OR [95% CI]: 3.45 [2.35-5.07]), as well as a significantly higher risk of major bleeding events in the first 30days (OR [95% CI]: 6.93 [5.13-9.38]). In addition, risk for other secondary cardiovascular endpoints, including recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, in-hospital heart failure, stent thrombosis and unplanned revascularization was also significantly higher in the TP versus the no TP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of TP during the in-hospital management of ACS patients is a significant predictor of both short- and long-term adverse events, including mortality. In the light of this evidence, clinicians should be cautious and closely monitor abnormal platelet counts that present early following an ACS.

Long-term outcomes associated with hospital acquired thrombocytopenia among patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acquired thrombocytopenia after a non-ST-segment-elevation-acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) has been associated with increased in-hospital mortality and hemorrhagic complications, but longer term outcomes are unclear. We examined the association between thrombocytopenia and long-term outcomes after accounting for thrombocytopenia severity and discharge medication use.

METHODS

Data from 7,435 NSTE-ACS patients enrolled in the SYNERGY trial were analyzed. Severe thrombocytopenia was defined as a nadir platelet count <100 × 10(9)/L or a ≥ 50% drop from baseline. Mild thrombocytopenia was defined as a nadir platelet count between 100 and 149 × 10(9)/L with a <50% drop from baseline. The primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital GUSTO moderate-severe bleeding and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 675 patients (9.1%) developed mild thrombocytopenia and 139 patients (1.9%) developed severe thrombocytopenia. In-hospital bleeding risks were higher in patients with mild (7.7%, adjusted HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.16-2.29) or severe (28.2%, adjusted HR 6.93, 95% CI 4.55-10.56) thrombocytopenia than in patients without thrombocytopenia (5.2%). One-year mortality rates were 6.5%, 8.1%, and 28.1% among patients with no, mild, and severe thrombocytopenia, respectively (log rank P < 0.001) but only severe thrombocytopenia remained significantly associated with increased mortality after adjustment: HR 4.07, 95% CI 2.86-5.78. Patients who developed severe thrombocytopenia were less likely to be discharged on guideline-recommended antiplatelet therapy. The relationship between severe thrombocytopenia and mortality was attenuated by but persisted after adjusting for discharge medication use (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.49-5.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombocytopenia occurs commonly during the course of NSTE-ACS care; even mild decreases are associated with clinically meaningful bleeding. Patients who developed severe thrombocytopenia were less likely to be discharged on guideline-recommended antiplatelet therapy; this may contribute to their higher associated long-term mortality.

Unexpected hematologic effects of biotherapeutics in nonclinical species and in humans

Biotherapeutics are expanding the arsenal of therapeutics available for treating and preventing disease. Although initially thought to have limited side effects due to the specificity of their binding, these drugs have now been shown to have potential for adverse drug reactions including effects on peripheral blood cell counts or function. Hematotoxicity caused by a biotherapeutic can be directly related to the activity of the biotherapeutic or can be indirect and due to autoimmunity, biological cascades, antidrug antibodies, or other immune system responses. Biotherapeutics can cause hematotoxicity primarily as a result of cellular activation, cytotoxicity, drug-dependent and independent immune responses, and sequelae from initiating cytokine and complement cascades.  The underlying pathogenesis of biotherapeutic-induced hematotoxicity often is poorly understood. Nonclinical studies have generally predicted clinical hematotoxicity for recombinant cytokines and growth factors.  However, most hematologic liabilities of biotherapeutics are not based on drug class but are species specific, immune-mediated, and of low incidence. Despite the potential for unexpected hematologic toxicity, the risk-benefit profile of most biotherapeutics is favorable; hematologic effects are readily monitorable and managed by dose modification, drug withdrawal, and/or therapeutic intervention.  This article reviews examples of biotherapeutics that have unexpected hematotoxicity in nonclinical or clinical studies. 

Review of Currently Available GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitors and Their Role in Peripheral Vascular Interventions

The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) antagonists are the most recent additions to the antiplatelet agents available to the interventional radiologist. The currently available GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban. These medications have demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy in the setting of coronary arterial interventions. The fundamental benefit of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists lies in their unique mechanism of action: the ability to prevent platelet aggregation, thrombus formation, and distal thromboembolism while preserving initial platelet binding to damaged vascular surfaces. A paucity of data exists regarding the role of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in peripheral vascular interventions. The GP IIb/IIIa antagonists would theoretically provide excellent antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing any of a variety of endovascular interventions during which thrombosis or thromboembolism may endanger distal perfusion in patients with peripheral vascular disease. The goal of this summary is to review the indications for use, pharmacology, and evidence for efficacy of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in hopes of translating these data for application in the peripheral arterial circulation. Further research is necessary to determine how these agents may be safely used in combination with other anticoagulants or with stents, efficacy compared with standard regimens, success at preventing distal thromboembolism, and cost effectiveness.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor associated severe thrombocytopenia in patients with coronary artery disease: Clinical course and outcomes

Thrombocytopenia, both at baseline and acquired throughout admission is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. It is not known whether severe thrombocytopenia in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) carries the same risk as thrombocytopenia from other aetiologies. We identified 50 consecutive patients referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who developed severe thrombocytopenia (<50  × 10(9) cells/l) and followed their clinical course to 30 days. Two groups were compared: (1) severe thrombocytopenia following GPI usage and (2) severe thrombocytopenia without exposure to GPI. Baseline platelet counts were higher in GPI group (201 ± 62 vs. 112 ± 83  × 10(9) cells/l, p < 0.05). Patients in GPI group had more profound thrombocytopenia yet quicker recovery of platelet counts. The GPI group received fewer blood product transfusions (red cells: 0.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.3 ± 2.0, p < 0.05, platelets: 0.22 ± 0.6 vs. 1.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.05) and had lower event rates for the primary end point of 30-day mortality (3.7% vs. 42.1%, p < 0.05), and for major bleeding (0% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.05). In conclusion, GPI associated severe thrombocytopenia follows a distinct clinical course when compared to severe thrombocytopenia due to other aetiologies. Our results suggest that patients who develop severe thrombocytopenia following GPI therapy may be managed conservatively with careful monitoring.

Thrombocytopenia following percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an underappreciated condition that is often clinically challenging. There are no guidelines on the management of patients with this condition.

OBJECTIVE

To review recent data in etiologies, risk factors, prevention, management, and prognostic implications of thrombocytopenia following PCI.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar using the term thrombocytopenia + PCI and other relevant keywords to identify systematic reviews, clinical trials, cohort studies, case series, and case reports. The review was limited to English-language articles published between January 1980 and June 2009. Articles on patients with baseline thrombocytopenia prior to PCI were excluded.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Thrombocytopenia is not infrequent following PCI. The typical patient with post-PCI thrombocytopenia is on multiple therapies that can potentially cause a decrease in the platelet count. Identification of the cause is critical because management of the condition varies significantly based on the etiology. The severity of the thrombocytopenia also determines the clinical management of the patient. Several observational studies have demonstrated the adverse prognostic impact of the complication on clinical outcomes and have identified risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Judicious use of therapies that can cause thrombocytopenia, efficient detection of the cause of the decrease in platelet count, and appropriate management of the condition can potentially improve the quality of care and outcomes following PCI. Further research into risk factors that predispose post-PCI patients to developing thrombocytopenia is warranted.

Drug-induced thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients

Thrombocytopenia occurs in 15% to 58% of intensive care unit patients. The incidence varies based upon patient population, timing and frequency of platelet monitoring, and definition of thrombocytopenia. Up to 25% of acutely ill patients develop drug-induced thrombocytopenia. When drug-induced thrombocytopenia is suspected, nondrug related causes must be evaluated and excluded. Establishing the diagnosis of drug-induced thrombocytopenia is challenging, as hundreds of medications have been implicated. Medications commonly associated with drug-induced thrombocytopenia include glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, cinchona alkaloids, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and heparin. Once the diagnosis is suspected, clinicians should identify the start date of medications to assess the timeline of development. The likelihood of each medication causing thrombocytopenia must be evaluated. The risk vs. benefit of discontinuing the suspected medication and availability of alternative medications must be assessed. The role of corticosteroids, immune globulin, and plasmapheresis is uncertain. Once the offending agent has been discontinued, the overall prognosis is excellent. In the case of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an alternative anticoagulant should be initiated. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia should be documented in the medical record and reported according to institutional and national standards. This review focuses on immune-mediated drug-induced thrombocytopenia from medications commonly utilized in the critically ill patient.

[A man in his sixties with myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and haemorrhage]

A man in his sixties had acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (treated with PCI [percutaneous coronary intervention] and antithrombotic medication) complicated by recurrent stent thrombosis. Excessive haematuria and discovery of a urinary bladder cancer complicated the antithrombotic treatment. Due to recurrent stent thrombosis the patient underwent a total of four PCIs and received the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-inhibitor abciximab on two occasions. After the last administration of abciximab he developed excessive bleeding within an hour; a blood sample revealed severe thrombocytopenia (2 x 10(9)/l). Severe thrombocytopenia is a rare, but well-known complication to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-inhibitor treatment and is most often seen after readministration of abciximab. The problem of recurrent coronary stent thrombosis was solved by aorto-coronary bypass surgery, which should always be considered in patients with recurrent stent thrombosis and complications to anti-thrombotic treatment. When bleeding occurs in connection with abciximab treatment, especially within the first month after previous treatment, severe thrombocytopenia should always be considered as a possible cause. Abciximab should be avoided in patients with a history of severe abciximab-related thrombocytopenia.

Use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in diabetics undergoing PCI for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: impact of clinical status and procedural characteristics

Background

The most recent ESC guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) recommend the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) in high risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), particularly in diabetics. Little is known about the adherence to these guidelines within Europe.

Methods and results

Between May 2005 and April 2008 a total of 47,407 consecutive patients undergoing PCI were prospectively enrolled into the PCI-Registry of the Euro Heart Survey Programme. In the present analysis we examined the use of GPI in 2,922 diabetics who underwent PCI for NSTE-ACS. In this high risk population only 22.2% received a GPI; 8.9% upstream and 13.4% during PCI. The strategy of the individual institution had a major impact on the usage of GPI. In the multiple regression analysis clinical instability and complex lesion characteristics were strong independent determinants for the use of GPI, whereas renal insufficiency was negatively associated with its use. After adjustment for confounding variables no significant differences in hospital mortality could be observed between the cohorts, but a significantly higher rate of non-fatal postprocedural myocardial infarction was observed among patients receiving GPI upstream.

Conclusions

Despite the recommendation for its use in the current ESC guidelines, only a minority of the diabetics in Europe undergoing PCI for NSTE-ACS received a GPI. The use of GPI was mainly triggered by high-risk interventional scenarios.

Cooperation between integrin alphavbeta3 and VEGFR2 in angiogenesis

The cross-talk between receptor tyrosine kinases and integrin receptors are known to be crucial for a number of cellular functions. On endothelial cells, an interaction between integrin alphavbeta3 and VEGFR2 seems to be particularly important process during vascularization. Importantly, the functional association between VEGFR2 and integrin alphavbeta3 is of reciprocal nature since each receptor is able to promote activation of its counterpart. This mutually beneficial relationship regulates a number of cellular activities involved in angiogenesis, including endothelial cell migration, survival and tube formation, and hematopoietic cell functions within vasculature. This article discusses several possible mechanisms reported by different labs which mediate formation of the complex between VEGFR-2 and alphavbeta3 on endothelial cells. The pathological consequences and regulatory events involved in this receptor cross-talk are also presented.

[Thrombocytopenia in a patient with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention]

Thrombocytopenia in patients with percutanous coronary intervention is a known complication of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. This can limit the application of these agents. Platelet count monitoring 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours after starting the treatment reveals most cases of acute thrombocytopenia. Side effects can be avoided by the early discontinuation of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist treatment. A selective diagnostic approach by laboratory measures should exclude any confusion with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and pseudo thrombocytopenia.

[Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia]

Hemorrhage is the most common and best-recognized complication of heparin treatment. However, a potentially more dangerous complication is the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). All patients exposed to heparin, irrespective of the dose and route of administration, are at risk of developing HIT. It is due to the formation of antibodies against the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex, which cause secondary activation of platelets, coagulation and, finally, increased thrombin production. The main symptom is the sudden onset of thrombocytopenia involving a drop in the platelet count to less than 50% of the basal level, with or without the appearance of thrombotic complications some 5 to 14 days after the start of heparin therapy. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can be detected early in patients receiving heparin by monitoring the platelet count. Demonstration of heparin-dependent platelet activation using an antigen or functional assay confirms the clinical diagnosis. Once the diagnosis of HIT has been confirmed serologically or there is a high level of suspicion of HIT, heparin must be suspended and treatment with an alternative anticoagulant should be considered. This review contains a discussion of the diagnosis and treatment of this syndrome.