Recent in vitro findings of negative inotropy of pantoprazole did not translate into clinically relevant effects on left ventricular function in healthy volunteers

Use of Proton-Pump Inhibitors Predicts Heart Failure and Death in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVES

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) seem to increase the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), mainly in those using clopidogrel. We analysed the impact of PPIs on the prognosis of patients with stable CAD.

METHODS

We followed 706 patients with CAD. Primary outcome was the combination of secondary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were 1) acute ischaemic events (any acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack) and 2) heart failure (HF) or death.

RESULTS

Patients on PPIs were older [62.0 (53.0-73.0) vs. 58.0 (50.0-70.0) years; p = 0.003] and had a more frequent history of stroke (4.9% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.004) than those from the non-PPI group, and presented no differences in any other clinical variable, including cardiovascular risk factors, ejection fraction, and therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Follow-up was 2.2±0.99 years. Seventy-eight patients met the primary outcome, 53 developed acute ischaemic events, and 33 HF or death. PPI use was an independent predictor of the primary outcome [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.281 (1.244-4.183); p = 0.008], along with hypertension, body-mass index, glomerular filtration rate, atrial fibrillation, and nitrate use. PPI use was also an independent predictor of HF/death [HR = 5.713 (1.628-20.043); p = 0.007], but not of acute ischaemic events. A propensity score showed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CAD, PPI use is independently associated with an increased incidence of HF and death but not with a high rate of acute ischaemic events. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Gastroduodenal Ulceration in Small Animals: Part 2. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists

In the first part of this review, we discussed the pathophysiology and epidemiology of gastric acid secretion and the epidemiology of gastroduodenal ulceration in dogs and cats. In this section, we discuss the pharmacology and evidence-based clinical use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors.

Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of adverse cardiac events

Background

Recent evidence suggests that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) might be linked with adverse cardiac events, but a causal relationship is unproven.

Methods

We applied the self-matched case series method to two studies using population-based health care data from Ontario, Canada between 1996 and 2008. The first included subjects aged 66 years or older hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction within 12 weeks following initiation of PPI, while the second included subjects hospitalized for heart failure. In both studies we designated the primary risk interval as the initial 4 weeks of therapy and the control interval as the final 4 weeks. To test the specificity of our findings we examined use of histamine H2 receptor antagonists and benzodiazepines, drugs with no plausible causal link to adverse cardiac events.

Results

During the 13-year study period, we identified 5550 hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction and 6003 admissions for heart failure within 12 weeks of commencing PPI therapy. In the main analyses, we found that initiation of a PPI was associated with a higher risk of acute myocardial infarction (odds ratio 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 1.9) and heart failure (odds ratio 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 1.9). However, secondary analyses revealed similar risk estimates histamine H2 receptor antagonists and benzodiazepines, drugs with no known or suspected association with adverse cardiac events.

Conclusion

PPIs are associated with a short-term risk of adverse cardiac events, but similar associations are seen with other drugs exhibiting no known cardiac toxicity. Collectively these observations suggest that the association between PPIs and adverse cardiac events does not represent reflect cause-and-effect.

Echocardiogram study to evaluate the effect of the novel hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor GSK2336805 on cardiac contractility in healthy subjects

GSK2336805 is a hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study in healthy adults to evaluate the effects of a single 150-mg dose of GSK2336805 on echocardiographic measures of contractility. GSK2336805 had no effect on ejection fraction, and there was no significant correlation between GSK2336805 plasma concentration and ejection fraction. (This study has been registered at Clinicaltrials.gov under registration no. NCT01424540.).

Use of oral proton pump inhibitors is not associated with harm in patients with chronic heart failure in an ambulatory setting

AIMS

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) produce negative inotropic effects on the human myocardium at clinically relevant plasma concentrations. We conducted this study to determine whether PPI use was associated with excess mortality in patients with both ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart failure (HF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The impact of PPIs on all-cause mortality was examined using a population-based cohort of Alberta residents over the age of 65 with a diagnosis of HF, logistic regression analysis, and a nested case-control study were used to examine the association between current medication use and mortality. Compared with non-PPI users (n= 15,676, 71% of the HF cohort), PPI users (n= 6431, 29% of the HF cohort) were more likely to be women and had more co-morbidities. Mortality in the first year after diagnosis of HF was 32% (n= 5659) in PPI non-users and 26% (n= 1153) in PPI users. Logistic regression modelling showed that PPI use was associated with a relative reduction in mortality rates compared with non-use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.93]. Nested case-control analysis of the 5815 patients who died matched to 9934 controls, revealed that current PPI use was not associated with excess mortality (aOR 0.88, 95%CI 0.77-1.01), while use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker s (aOR 0.70, 95%CI 0.62-0.79) or beta-blockers (aOR 0.57, 95%CI 0.50-0.66), was associated with a relative reduction in mortality.

CONCLUSION

The use of PPIs in patients with HF is common. Despite in vitro concerns about negative inotropic effects with PPIs, there is no association with increased risk of mortality in chronic HF patients who use PPIs in an ambulatory setting.

A comparative evaluation of electrical velocimetry and inert gas rebreathing for the non-invasive assessment of cardiac output

BACKGROUND

When assessing the function of the cardiovascular system, cardiac output (CO) is a substantial parameter. For its determination, numerous non-invasive techniques have been proposed in the recent years including inert gas rebreathing (IGR) and impedance cardiography (ICG). The aim of our study was to evaluate whether a novel ICG algorithm (electrical velocimetry) and IGR can be used interchangeably in the clinical setting.

METHODS

A total of 120 consecutive stable patients were included resulting in two pairs of repeated non-invasive cardiac output measurements.

RESULTS

The mean CO was 5.0 ± 1.2 l/min (range 2.6-8.6 l/min) using IGR and 4.4 ± 1.1 l/min (1.7-7.4 l/min) using ICG, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis revealed an acceptable agreement with a mean bias of 0.6 ± 1.2 l/min. We found a high reproducibility with a mean bias of 0.2 ± 0.7 l/min for IGR and 0.0 ± 0.3 l/min for ICG (p < 0.001), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference for unphysiological circulatory conditions represented by values of 2.6-4.1 l/min and 5.6-8.6 l/min.

CONCLUSIONS

Both non-invasive techniques are associated with low operating costs and require only a few expendable items for the rapid determination of cardiac function. We found an acceptable agreement between IGR and ICG as well as a high reproducibility, which was statistically significant higher for ICG. For cardiac output states exceeding the physiological range, we found a statistically significant difference. Consequently, values of cardiac function determined by either method should not be used interchangeably in the clinical setting.