Ivabradine in pulmonary arterial hypertension: can we delay the need for parenteral prostanoid therapy?

Heart Rate Reduction Improves Right Ventricular Function and Fibrosis in Pulmonary Hypertension

The potential benefit of heart rate reduction (HRR), independent of β-blockade, on right ventricular (RV) function in pulmonary hypertension (PH) remains undecided. We studied HRR effects on RV fibrosis and function in PH and RV pressure-loading models. Adult rats were randomized to 1) sham controls, 2) monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PH, 3) SU5416 + hypoxia (SUHX)-induced PH, or 4) pulmonary artery banding (PAB). Ivabradine (IVA) (10 mg/kg/d) was administered from 2 weeks after PH induction or PAB. Exercise tolerance, echocardiography, and pressure-volume hemodynamics were obtained at a terminal experiment 3 weeks later. RV myocardial samples were analyzed for putative mechanisms of HRR effects through fibrosis, profibrotic molecular signaling, and Ca⁺⁺ handling. The effects of IVA versus carvedilol on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes beat rate and relaxation properties were evaluated in vitro. Despite unabated severely elevated RV systolic pressures, IVA improved RV systolic and diastolic function, profibrotic signaling, and RV fibrosis in PH/PAB rats. RV systolic-elastance (control, 121 ± 116; MCT, 49 ± 36 vs. MCT+IVA, 120 ± 54; PAB, 70 ± 20 vs. PAB+IVA, 168 ± 76; SUHX, 86 ± 56 vs. SUHX +IVA, 218 ± 111; all P < 0.05), the time constant of RV relaxation, echo indices of RV function, and fibrosis (fibrosis: control, 4.6 ± 1%; MCT, 13.4 ± 6.5 vs. MCT+IVA, 6.7 ± 2.6%; PAB, 11.4 ± 4.5 vs. PAB+IVA, 6.4 ± 5.1%; SUHX, 10 ± 4.6 vs. SUHX+IVA, 3.9 ± 2.2%; all P < 0.001) were improved by IVA versus controls. IVA had a dose-response effect on induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes beat rate by delaying Ca⁺⁺ loss from the cytoplasm. In experimental PH or RV pressure loading, HRR improves RV fibrosis, function, and exercise endurance independent of β-blockade. The balance between adverse tachycardia and bradycardia requires further study, but judicious HRR may provide a promising strategy to improve RV function in clinical PH.

Ivabradine: Evidence and current role in cardiovascular diseases and other emerging indications

Increased heart rate (HR) is associated with deleterious effects on several disease conditions. Chronic heart failure (CHF) is one of the cardiovascular diseases with recurrent hospitalization burden and an ongoing drain on health-care expenditure. Despite advancement in medicine, management of CHF remains a challenge to health-care providers. Ivabradine selectively and specifically inhibits the pacemaker I(f) ionic current which reduces the cardiac pacemaker activity. The main effect of ivabradine therapy is the substantial lowering of HR. It does not influence intracardiac conduction, contractility, or ventricular repolarization. As shown in numerous clinical studies, ivabradine improves clinical outcomes and quality of life and reduces the risk of death from heart failure (HF) or other cardiovascular causes. Recently updated HF guidelines recommend ivabradine as a class II indication for reduction of HF hospitalizations. Based on the principle of benefits of reduced HR, the ivabradine in patients with ischemic heart disease, sepsis, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome has also been studied. It can also be a useful agent for HR reduction in patients with contraindications to use beta-blockers or those who cannot tolerate them. In this review, we provide an overview of efficacy and safety of ivabradine and its combination with currently recommended pharmacological therapy in different conditions.

Resting heart rate: risk indicator and emerging risk factor in cardiovascular disease

Resting heart rate is central to cardiac output and is influenced by changes occurring in numerous diseases. It predicts longevity and cardiovascular diseases, and current evidence suggests that it is also an important marker of outcome in cardiovascular disease, including heart failure. Beta-blockers improve outcomes in heart failure; however, they have effects outside reducing heart rate. Ivabradine has demonstrated efficacy in reducing rehospitalizations and mortality in heart failure and in improving exercise tolerance and reducing angina attacks in patients with coronary artery disease, whereas selective heart rate reduction may also prove to be beneficial in therapeutic areas outside those in which ivabradine has already demonstrated clinical efficacy. This review provides an update on the associations between heart rate and cardiovascular outcomes in various conditions, the experimental effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine, and the potential new indications in cardiovascular disease.