Impact of rapid ventricular pacing during TAVI on microvascular tissue perfusion

Temporary decrease in microvascular tissue saturation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

Data on the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on peripheral microcirculation are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate peripheral microvascular tissue saturation (StO2) before and after TAVI in relation to central and peripheral hemodynamics, cardiac and renal function.

METHODS

In this single-center prospective study, patients with severe aortic stenosis (sAS) scheduled for TAVI or cardiac catheterization (control) were assessed before and up to five days after the procedure. Cardiac function including cardiac output (CO) was assessed by echocardiography. Brachial (bBP) and central blood pressure (cBP), ankle brachial index (ABI), and parameters of arterial stiffness, including augmentation pressure (AP) and augmentation index adjusted for heart rate (AIx@HR75) were measured to assess hemodynamic changes. StO2 was measured in all extremities using a near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) camera. Renal function was measured by creatinine levels.

RESULTS

26 patients underwent TAVI and 11 patients served as control. Cardiac output was significantly increased, whereas hemodynamic parameters and peripheral StO2 were significantly decreased after TAVI. At follow-up, StO2 returned to baseline values. Changes in StO2 were negatively related to creatinine levels.

CONCLUSION

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation causes a temporary decrease in microvascular tissue saturation that is associated with renal function.

Effects of low versus high inspired oxygen fraction on myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Oxygen therapy is used in various clinical situation, but its clinical outcomes are inconsistent. The relationship between the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and clinical outcomes has not been well studied. We investigated the association of FIO2 (low vs. high) and myocardial injury in patients undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

Adults undergoing transfemoral TAVI under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive FIO2 0.3 or 0.8 during procedure. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) during the first 72 h following TAVI. Secondary outcomes included the AUC for postprocedural creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB), acute kidney injury and recovery, conduction abnormalities, pacemaker implantation, stroke, myocardial infarction, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Between October 2017 and April 2022, 72 patients were randomized and 62 were included in the final analysis (n = 31 per group). The median (IQR) AUC for hs-cTnI in the first 72 h was 42.66 (24.82-65.44) and 71.96 (35.38-116.34) h·ng/mL in the FIO2 0.3 and 0.8 groups, respectively (p = 0.066). The AUC for CK-MB in the first 72 h was 257.6 (155.6-322.0) and 342.2 (195.4-485.2) h·ng/mL in the FIO2 0.3 and 0.8 groups, respectively (p = 0.132). Acute kidney recovery, defined as an increase in the estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 25% of baseline in 48 h, was more common in the FIO2 0.3 group (65% vs. 39%, p = 0.042). Other clinical outcomes were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIO2 level did not have a significant effect on periprocedural myocardial injury following TAVI. However, considering the marginal results, a benefit of low FIO2 during TAVI could not be ruled out.

Caval Valve Implantation

Transcathetertherapy has expanded the treatment options for patients with heart valve disease. Interventional therapy for aortic, mitral, and pulmonic valve disease is well established; however, catheter-based approaches to tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are still in early stages of development. For some of the interventional concepts to TR, including the edge-to-edge-repair, transcatheter annuloplasty, the tricuspid spacer, and caval valves, procedural feasibility and favorable early clinical outcome have been demonstrated in small compassionate case series. This article reviews the pathophysiological background and current evidence for caval valve implantation and examines the potential role of this approach for the treatment of severe TR.

Coronary Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis

Aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently coexist, with up to two thirds of patients with AS having significant CAD. Given the challenges when both disease states are present, these patients require a tailored approach diagnostically and therapeutically. In this review the authors address the impact of AS and aortic valve replacement (AVR) on coronary hemodynamic status and discuss the assessment of CAD and the role of revascularization in patients with concomitant AS and CAD. Remodeling in AS increases the susceptibility of myocardial ischemia, which can be compounded by concomitant CAD. AVR can improve coronary hemodynamic status and reduce ischemia. Assessment of the significance of coexisting CAD can be done using noninvasive and invasive metrics. Revascularization in patients undergoing AVR can benefit certain patients in whom CAD is either prognostically or symptomatically important. Identifying this cohort of patients is challenging and as yet incomplete. Patients with dual pathology present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge; both AS and CAD affect coronary hemodynamic status, they provoke similar symptoms, and their respective treatments can have an impact on both diseases. Decisions regarding coronary revascularization should be based on understanding this complex relationship, using appropriate coronary assessment and consensus within a multidisciplinary team.

Intraoperative hypotension and delirium among older adults undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Background

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequently observed complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The effects of intraoperative hypotension (IOH) on POD occurrence are currently unclear.

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent TAVR was conducted. We predefined IOH as area under the threshold (AUT) of five mean arterial blood pressures (MBP), varying from <100 to <60 mmHg. The AUT consisted of the combination of duration and depth under the MBP thresholds, expressed in mmHg*min. All MBP AUTs were computed based on the complete procedure, independent of procedural phase or duration.

Results

This cohort included 675 patients who underwent TAVR under general anesthesia (n = 128, 19%) or procedural sedation (n = 547, 81%). Delirium occurred mostly during the first 2 days after TAVR, and was observed in n = 93 (14%) cases. Furthermore, 674, 672, 663, 630, and 518 patients had at least 1 min intraoperative MBP <100, <90, <80, <70, and <60 mmHg, respectively. Patients who developed POD had higher AUT based on all five MBP thresholds during TAVR. The penalized adjusted odds ratio varied between 1.08 (99% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–1.56) for the AUT based on MBP < 100 mmHg and OR 1.06 (99% CI 0.88–1.28) for the AUT based on MBP < 60 mmHg.

Conclusions

Intraoperative hypotension is frequently observed during TAVR, but not independently associated with POD after TAVR. Other potential factors than intraoperative hypotension may explain the occurrence of delirium after TAVR.

Safety and feasibility of retrograde INOUE-BALLOON for balloon aortic valvuloplasty without rapid ventricular pacing during transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) is commonly employed during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); however, frequent TAVR is associated with worse prognoses. The retrograde INOUE-BALLOON^® (IB) allows balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) without RVP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of retrograde IB for TAVR preparation. The study population included 178 consecutive patients (mean age, 84 ± 5 years; male, 47%) who underwent retrograde BAV before prosthetic valve replacement via the transfemoral approach. Patients were divided into a retrograde IB group without RVP (n = 74) and a conventional balloon (CB) group with RVP (n = 104). The primary endpoint was prolonged hypotension after BAV (reduced systolic pressure < 80 mmHg for over 1 min or vasopressor drug requirement). The incidence of prolonged hypotension after BAV was significantly lower in the IB group compared with the CB group (4% vs. 16%, p = 0.011). Balloons were able to penetrate and expand the aortic valve in both groups. RVP was used less for total TAVR in the IB group compared with the CB group. The aortic valve area-index after BAV was not significantly different between the two groups (0.72 ± 0.14 cm²/m² vs. 0.71 ± 0.12 cm²/m²; p = 0.856). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that IB use was associated with avoidance of prolonged hypotension (OR, 0.27 [0.059–0.952]; p = 0.041). In conclusion, BAV using retrograde IB without RVP is both safe and feasible. More stable hemodynamics were achieved using retrograde IB by avoiding RVP during TAVR.

Successful emergent transcatheter aortic valve implantation and left ventricular unloading by Impella in a patient with severe aortic stenosis who experienced cardiogenic shock after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a case report

Background

Determining the treatment strategy for cardiogenic shock following ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a patient with severe aortic stenosis remains challenging and is a matter of debate.

Case summary

An 84-year-old man with chest pain was transferred to our institute and subsequently diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and Killip class III heart failure. The patient was intubated, and urgent coronary angiography revealed severe tandem stenosis from the proximal to mid-left anterior descending coronary artery. We performed a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and deployed drug-eluting stents from the left main trunk to mid-left anterior descending coronary artery. Although the procedure was successful, the patient went into cardiogenic shock a few hours later. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed low cardiac function and severe aortic stenosis. We decided to perform transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a self-expandable valve, followed by the insertion of a left ventricular assist device. The combination of procedures achieved haemodynamic stability.

Discussion

It is difficult to treat cardiogenic shock that develops in patients with severe aortic stenosis and ST-elevation myocardial infarction. This case report demonstrates that combined transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding valve and left ventricular assist device placement can be safe and effective after a primary PCI.

Myocardial Injury After Balloon Predilatation Versus Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the DIRECTAVI Trial

Background Myocardial injury is associated with higher mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and might be increased by prior balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). We aimed to evaluate the impact of prior BAV versus direct prosthesis implantation on myocardial injury occurring after (TAVR) with balloon-expandable prostheses. Methods and Results The DIRECTAVI (Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial, an open-label randomized study, demonstrated noninferiority of TAVR without BAV (direct TAVR group) compared with systematic BAV (BAV group) with the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve. High-sensitivity troponin was assessed before and the day after the procedure. Incidence of myocardial injury after the procedure (high-sensitivity troponin elevation >15× the upper reference limit [14 ng/L]) was the main end point. Impact of myocardial injury on 1-month adverse events (all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding, major vascular complications, transfusion, acute kidney injury, heart failure, pacemaker implantation, and aortic regurgitation) was evaluated. Preprocedure and postprocedure high-sensitivity troponin levels were available in 211 patients. The mean age of patients was 83 years (78-87 years), with 129 men (61.1%). Mean postprocedure high-sensitivity troponin was 124.9±81.4 ng/L in the direct TAVR group versus 170.4±127.7 ng/L in the BAV group (P=0.007). Myocardial injury occurred in 42 patients (19.9%), including 13 patients (12.2%) in the direct TAVR group and 29 (27.9%) in the BAV group (P=0.004). BAV increased by 2.8-fold (95% CI, 1.4-5.8) myocardial injury probability. Myocardial injury was associated with 1-month adverse events (P=0.03). Conclusions BAV increased the incidence and magnitude of myocardial injury after TAVR with new-generation balloon-expandable valves. Myocardial injury was associated with 1-month adverse events. These results argue in favor of direct SAPIEN 3 valve implantation. Registration URL: https://www.Clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02729519.

Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Retinal Layer Thickness Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with clinically significant cerebral microembolism and cognitive status changes. There are no data on the impact of TAVR on retinal layers. We assessed the influence of TAVR on the retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell complex (GCC), and macular thickness (MT) measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Elderly patients (n = 50) with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR were included in this study (mean age: 78.5 ± 6.9 years). Retinal nerve fiber layer, GCC, and MT were measured with SD-OCT by an ophthalmologist before and on the first day and in the first month after TAVR. The average MT was significantly increased on the first day after TAVR compared with the basal value (P = .04). Ganglion cell complex thickness was significantly thinner on the first day after TAVR than the basal value in the inner inferior quadrant and outer temporal quadrant of the left eye (P = .03 and .04, respectively). Postoperative changes observed on the first day compared with the preoperative period returned to basal values in the first month. In conclusion, TAVR did not cause permanent changes in retinal layers.

What Is the Best Method to Achieve Safe and Precise Stent-Graft Deployment in Patients Undergoing TEVAR?

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic pathologies requires sufficient landing zone of ideally more than 25 mm for safe anchoring of the stent-graft and prevention of endoleaks. In the aortic arch and at the thoracoabdominal transition, landing zone length is usually limited by the offspring of the major aortic side-branches. Exact deployment of the stent-graft to effectively use the whole length of the landing zone and to prevent occlusion of one of the side-branches is key to successful TEVAR. There are numerous techniques described to lower blood pressure and to reduce or eliminate aortic impulse to facilitate exact deployment of stent-grafts including pharmacologic blood pressure lowering, adenosine-induced asystole, inflow occlusion, and rapid pacing. Aim of this review was to assess the current literature to identify which of the techniques is best suited to prevent displacement and allow for precise placement of the stent-graft and safe balloon-molding.

Contemporary balloon aortic valvuloplasty: Changing indications and refined technique

Even if un to improve long-term prognosis, balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) may be useful in selected patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis either as a bridge to surgical or transcatheter valve replacement (aortic valve replacement [AVR] or transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) or as a triage strategy for patients with uncertain indications. International guidelines recommend BAV as: a "bridge" to AVR/TAVI, a "trial" in patients with undetermined symptoms, or a "bridge-to-decision" in case of comorbidities. However, in clinical practice, BAV is also used as a palliative measure to improve hemodynamics and quality of life in many patients who are excluded from AVR/TAVI. Finally, BAV is often performed during TAVI to facilitate prosthesis delivery, optimize frame expansion, or for bioprosthetic valve fracture in selected valve-in-valve procedures. Technical innovations, which allow for a mini-invasive approach via transradial access and pacing delivered through the wire, have led to a decrease in complications over time. This review focuses on contemporary BAV with a specific emphasis on new indications, innovative techniques, and specific complex patient subgroups.

The Determinants and Outcomes of Myocardial Injury After Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation: SAPIEN 3 Study

BACKGROUND

The effect of myocardial injury (MI) post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on clinical outcomes is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of MI severity on clinical outcome and left ventricle function 30 days post-TAVI and determine MI post-TAVI predictors.

METHODS

Overall, 138 consecutive patients who underwent successful transfemoral TAVI using SAPIEN3 and diagnosed using echocardiography and computed tomography were analyzed. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (TnT) was evaluated at baseline, immediately, and at 24, 48, and 72 h post-TAVI. Echocardiography findings and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-pro BNP) levels were evaluated 30 days post-TAVI.

RESULTS

Mean age and STS score were 84.4 ± 3.5 years and 6.4 ± 3.2%, respectively. All cases showed severe aortic valve stenosis. Peri-procedural MI was observed in 48 of 100 patients (48.0%). Patients were grouped into MI (n = 48) and non-MI (n = 52), without significant difference in characteristics. Pre-balloon aortic valvuloplasty rate and total pacing time were significantly higher in MI vs non-MI. Total rapid pacing time (TRPT) was an independent predictor for MI (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.16; p = 0.04). Echocardiography and Nt-pro BNP changes 30 days post-TAVI were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Peri-procedural MI, assessed by TnT changes, was observed in 48% of patients. The MI was not associated with overt cardiac dysfunction, and the recovery of left ventricular function and Nt-pro BNP level occurred similarly by 30 day post-TAVI between both groups. In multivariate analysis, TRPT was associated with MI after SAPIEN3 implantation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000036669.

Impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation on transvalvular gradient and flow in severe aortic stenosis: a systematic ex vivo analysis of a subentity of low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis

AIMS

Evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) is based on echocardiographic measurement of mean pressure gradient (MPG), flow velocity (Vmax) and aortic valve area (AVA). The objective of the present study was to analyse the impact of systemic haemodynamic variables and concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) on aortic MPG, Vmax and AVA in severe AS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A pulsatile circulatory model was designed to study function and interdependence of stenotic aortic (AVA: 1.0 cm², 0.8 cm² and 0.6 cm²) and insufficient mitral prosthetic valves (n=8; effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA] <0.2 cm² vs. >0.4 cm²) using Doppler ultrasound. In the absence of severe MR, a stepwise increase of stroke volume (SV) and a decrease of AVA was associated with a proportional increase of aortic MPG. When MR with EROA <0.2 cm² vs. >0.4 cm² was introduced, forward SV decreased significantly (70.9±1.1 ml vs. 60.8±1.6 ml vs. 47.4±1.1 ml; p=0.02) while MR volume increased proportionally. This was associated with a subsequent reduction of aortic MPG (57.1±9.4 mmHg vs. 48.6±13.8 mmHg vs. 33.64±9.5 mmHg; p=0.035) and Vmax (5.09±0.4 m/s vs. 4.91±0.73 m/s vs. 3.75±0.57 m/s; p=0.007). Calculated AVA remained unchanged (without MR: AVA=0.53±0.04 cm² vs. with MR: AVA=0.52±0.05 cm²; p=ns). In the setting of severe AS without MR, changes of vascular resistance (SVR) and compliance (C) did not impact on aortic MPG (low SVR and C: 66±13.8 mmHg and 61.1±20 mmHg vs. high SVR and C: 60.9±9.2 mmHg and 71.5±13.5 mmHg; p=ns) In concomitant severe MR, aortic MPG and Vmax were not significantly reduced by increased SVR (36.6±2.2 mmHg vs. 34.9±5.6 mmHg, p=0.608; 3.89±0.18 m/s vs. 3.96±0.28 m/s; p=ns).

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic haemodynamic variables and concomitant MR may potentially affect diagnostic accuracy of echocardiographic AS evaluation. As demonstrated in the present study, MPG and Vmax are flow-dependent and significantly reduced by a reduction of forward SV from concomitant severe MR, resulting in another entity of low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis. In contrast, calculated AVA appears to be a robust parameter of AS evaluation if severe MR is present. Changes of SVR and C did not affect the diagnostic accuracy of AS evaluation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation utilizing a non-occlusive balloon for predilatation

BACKGROUND

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is routinely performed preceding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Among risks inherent in BAV is low cardiac output due to rapid ventricular pacing (RVP), especially in patients with severely impaired left ventricular function. We herein report early experience utilizing a non-occlusive balloon for BAV (TrueFlow™, BARD, Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, AZ, US), which does not require RVP.

METHODS

Between 11/2016 and 10/2017, 27 consecutive patients received TAVI using a non-occlusive balloon valvuloplasty catheter for predilatation and a self-expandable transcatheter heart valve (77.8% female, 81.7 ± 6.6 years, logEuroSCORE I 15.8 ± 10.3%, STS Prom Score 2.5 ± 0.5%). Hemodynamic measurements and acute outcome data were analyzed according to updated Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions.

RESULTS

Procedure time, fluoroscopy time and amount of contrast agent were 74.5 ± 17.4 min, 16.7 ± 6.9 min and 156.9 ± 92.7 ml. Device success and early combined safety were 100% and 92.6% (25/27). Effective BAV without RVP after the first inflation was achieved in 92.6% of the patients (25/27). Continuous recording of hemodynamics documented no relevant systemic pressure drop during BAV. Postdilatation with a regular balloon was required in 10/27 patients. No death was observed during 30-day follow-up. Resultant mean transvalvular gradient was 6.0 ± 3.5 mm Hg. In one patient a moderate paravalvular leakage was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of TAVI utilizing a novel non-occlusive balloon, safety and efficacy were demonstrated. Adequate predilatation was achieved in all cases without need for RVP and with stable hemodynamics. These results will have to be confirmed in larger patient cohorts.

Relationships Between Intraoperative Hemodynamic Parameters and Delayed Hemodynamic Recovery After Valve Deployment in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationships between intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and delayed hemodynamic recovery after valve deployment and identify the predictive factors of delayed hemodynamic recovery by focusing on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

A single university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-four patients who underwent elective TAVR between 2015 and 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

No intervention.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The 64 patients were divided into the following 2 groups according to the time for recovery: systolic arterial pressure exceeded 90 mmHg and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂) exceeded 65%-delayed recovery (DR) (n = 36) group, and early recovery (ER) (n = 28) group. ScvO₂ in the DR group was not lower than that in the ER group after induction of anesthesia. However, ScvO₂ in the DR group gradually decreased and was lower than that in the ER group before valve deployment, despite improvement in blood pressure through the administration of vasopressor agents.

CONCLUSION

ScvO₂ monitoring during TAVR is useful to predict delayed recovery greater than 60 seconds after valve deployment in TAVR.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation without prior balloon valvuloplasty is associated with less pronounced markers of myocardial injury

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valvulopathy in developed countries. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a therapeutic alternative in symptomatic patients at high or prohibitive perioperative risk. Predilatation by balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) under rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) has been a routine part of TAVI. However, both RVP and BAV carry substantial risks and an increasing number of interventional centers are performing TAVI without predilatation (direct TAVI). A transient decrease of left ventricular function and elevated markers of myocardial injury after TAVI with predilatation were observed in previous studies. In this study, we investigated whether direct TAVI was associated with a similar increase in cardiac biomarkers and decrease in ejection fraction in a cohort of our patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing TAVI without predilatation using a self-expanding system at a single center between April 2013 and December 2015 were followed up for one year and were retrospectively analyzed regarding mortality, safety and efficacy endpoints as well as common laboratory and echocardiographic parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients (83±6 years; 56% female) were included in the analysis. According to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) criteria the technical success rate was 96.3% and 89.1% of patients remained free of a combined safety endpoint at 30 days. Mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year were 3.0% (N.=5) and 10.4% (N.=17), respectively. TAVI without predilatation was highly effective in lowering aortic valve peak velocity from 4.4±0.6 m/s before to 1.7±0.5 m/s (P<0.01), and mean pressure gradient across the valve from 48.7±15.1 mmHg to 8.3±4.5 mmHg (<0.05). Left ventricular function remained unaltered after the intervention (51±10% prior to TAVI and 51±9% post TAVI), whereas high sensitive troponin T (hs-TnT), a well-established marker for myocardial injury, increased significantly from 26 ng/L (interquartile range=18.00-44.00) to 119 ng/L (interquartile range=73.25-166.00, P<0.001) during this time. Notably, an increase in the plasma levels of hs-TnT >15 times the upper limit of normal was associated with mortality both one month and one year after TAVI.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVI without predilatation is feasible, safe and effective for aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high perioperative risk. In contrast to a cohort of patients who underwent TAVI with predilatation previously published by another center, our patients did not suffer from transient impairment of left ventricular function. As a marker of myocardial injury, hs-TnT showed a less pronounced increase than reported previously. This might be a marker for a prognostic benefit as hs-TnT has been shown to be a strong predictor of outcome in patients undergoing TAVI. We conclude that direct TAVI is a less invasive option involving less myocardial stress.

Multi-biomarker analysis in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

BACKGROUND

In this study we sought to examine whether transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is followed by a change in the plasma levels of novel cardiovascular biomarkers.

METHODS

We collected blood samples of 79 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing TAVI before and at 7 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post TAVI and analyzed the plasma concentrations of GDF-15, H-FABP, fetuin-A, galectin 3, sST2 and suPAR by means of ELISA.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in the concentration of fetuin-A (median: 52.44 mg/ml to 113.2 mg/ml, p < 0.001) and a significant decrease of H-FABP after TAVI (median: 4.835 ng/ml to 2.534 ng/ml, p < 0.001). The concentrations of suPAR and sST2 showed an initial increase (suPAR median: 2755 pg/ml 3489 pg/ml, p < 0.001; sST2 median: 5832 pg/ml to 7137 pq/ml, p < 0.001) and subsequently decreased significantly.

CONCLUSION

We hypothesize that the decrease of H-FABP and the increase of fetuin-A could be due to a hemodynamic improvement after valve replacement. The initial increase of suPAR could indicate an inflammatory stimulus and the significant increase in sST2 could be due to the mechanical strain caused by implantation of the valve.

Meta-analysis of the Impact of Avoiding Balloon Predilation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Balloon predilation (BPD) has been an integral part of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) since inception. We sought to investigate the effect of avoiding BPD on outcomes of TAVI across different valve types. Articles were included if outcomes of TAVI without BPD were reported. Pooled meta-analysis used a random effects model and reported odds ratios (ORs). Twenty-one studies with 10,752 patients were pooled for analysis. Age and gender were well matched between NoBPD and BPD groups. There was no difference in mortality, stroke, bleeding, and acute kidney injury. NoBPD showed lower pacemaker rates (OR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 0.97), vascular complications (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95), and early safety at 30 days (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.99). For balloon-expandable valves, lower rates of aortic regurgitation (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.99) and early safety (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.85) were seen. Self-expanding valves showed lower pacemaker (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.97) and vascular complications (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.99), with a trend toward higher postdilation (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.67). TAVI without BPD is safe and effective. NoBPD is associated with fewer vascular complications, less aortic regurgitation, and fewer pacemaker requirements and composite early safety end points.

Impact of Rapid Ventricular Pacing on Outcome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background

Rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) is used commonly during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Little is known about the safety and clinical consequences of this step. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of RVP on immediate and long‐term clinical outcomes in a large cohort of non‐selected TAVR patients.

Method and Results

The study included 412 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with a mean age of 82±7 years, of which 47% were male. Patients were divided according to the number of RVPs during the TAVR procedure comparing patients undergoing no pacing (0), 1 to 2, and ≥3 pacing episodes (3+). Patients undergoing 3+ pacing episodes were significantly more likely to develop new atrial fibrillation (5.6% versus 7.3% versus 15%, respectively, for 0, 1–2, and 3+ groups, P=0.047), acute kidney injury (AKI) (18% versus 18% versus 28%, respectively, P<0.001), prolonged procedural hypotension (0%, 16%, and 25%, respectively; P<0.001), and suffered greater in‐hospital mortality (1.7%, 1.7%, and 6.5%, respectively, P=0.045), and 1‐year mortality (11.1%, 7.7%, and 18%, respectively, P=0.015). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that acute kidney injury (OR 3.27 [1.763–6.09], P<0.001), euroSCORE II (OR 1.06 per unit [1.01–1.12], P=0.03), and 3+ pacing episodes (OR 2.35 [1.18–4.7], P=0.02) were the only independent predictors for 1‐year mortality.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing TAVR, multiple RVP episodes and prolonged RVP duration are associated with adverse outcomes including short‐ and long‐term mortality. Thus, operators should attempt to minimize the use of RVP, especially in patients who are at risk for post‐procedural acute kidney injury.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation frequently coexists in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Patients with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation at the time of transcatheter aortic valve replacement are at increased risk of future adverse events. Whether concomitant mitral regurgitation is independently associated with worse outcomes after TAVR remains a matter of debate. The optimal therapeutic strategy in these patients-TAVR with evidence-based heart failure therapy, combined TAVR and transcatheter mitral valve intervention, or staged transcatheter therapies-is ill-defined, and guideline-based recommendations in patients at increased risk for open heart surgery are lacking. Hence, a thorough evaluation of the aortic and mitral valve anatomy and function, along with an in-depth assessment of the patients' baseline risk profile, provides the basis for an individualized treatment approach. The aim of this review is therefore to give an overview of the current literature on mitral regurgitation in TAVR, focusing on different diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and optimal clinical decision making.

Tricuspid Regurgitation - Medical Management and Evolving Interventional Concepts

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a complex condition of the right ventricle (RV) and tricuspid valve apparatus and is frequently associated with symptomatic heart failure and a significant morbidity and mortality. In these patients, left heart pathologies lead to chronic pressure overload of the RV, eventually causing progressive RV dilatation and functional TR. Therefore, TR cannot be considered as isolated heart valve disease pathology but has to be understood and treated as one component of a complex structural RV pathology and is frequently also a marker of an advanced stage of cardiac disease. In these patients, medical therapy restricted to diuretics and heart failure medication is frequently ineffective. Also, severe TR in the setting of advanced heart failure constitutes a high risk for cardiac surgery. Neither one of these treatment options has demonstrated a beneficial effect on long-term prognosis. The recent innovations in transcatheter technology led to efforts to develop interventional approaches to severe TR. Multiple innovative treatment concepts are currently under preclinical and clinical investigation to replace or repair TV function. However, up to date none of these approaches is established and there is still a lack of clinical data to support the efficacy of transcatheter TR treatment.

Caval Valve Implantation

Recently, transcatheter therapy has expanded the treatment options for patients with heart valve disease. With the growing understanding of tricuspid regurgitation and its natural history, it becomes increasingly obvious that this patient population is a heterogeneous cohort presenting for treatment in different stages of a continuous disease process. It is still unclear which interventional approach will result in functional and clinical success and in which subtype of patient population. This article reviews the pathophysiologic background and current evidence for caval valve implantation and examines the potential role of this approach for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation.

Stunning and Right Ventricular Dysfunction Is Induced by Coronary Balloon Occlusion and Rapid Pacing in Humans: Insights From Right Ventricular Conductance Catheter Studies

Background

We sought to determine whether right ventricular stunning could be detected after supply (during coronary balloon occlusion [BO]) and supply/demand ischemia (induced by rapid pacing [RP] during transcatheter aortic valve replacement) in humans.

Methods and Results

Ten subjects with single‐vessel right coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with normal ventricular function were studied in the BO group. Ten subjects undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement were studied in the RP group. In both, a conductance catheter was placed into the right ventricle, and pressure volume loops were recorded at baseline and for intervals over 15 minutes after a low‐pressure BO for 1 minute or a cumulative duration of RP for up to 1 minute. Ischemia‐induced diastolic dysfunction was seen 1 minute after RP (end‐diastolic pressure [mm Hg]: 8.1±4.2 versus 12.1±4.1, P<0.001) and BO (end‐diastolic pressure [mm Hg]: 8.1±4.0 versus 8.7±4.0, P=0.03). Impairment of systolic and diastolic function after BO remained at 15‐minutes recovery (ejection fraction [%]: 55.7±9.0 versus 47.8±6.3, P<0.01; end‐diastolic pressure [mm Hg]: 8.1±4.0 versus 9.2±3.9, P<0.01). Persistent diastolic dysfunction was also evident in the RP group at 15‐minutes recovery (end‐diastolic pressure [mm Hg]: 8.1±4.1 versus 9.9±4.4, P=0.03) and there was also sustained impairment of load‐independent indices of systolic function at 15 minutes after RP (end‐systolic elastance and ventriculo‐arterial coupling [mm Hg/mL]: 1.25±0.31 versus 0.85±0.43, P<0.01).

Conclusions

RP and right coronary artery balloon occlusion both cause ischemic right ventricular dysfunction with stunning observed later during the procedure. This may have intraoperative implications in patients without right ventricular functional reserve.

Transfemoral aortic valve implantation using a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve without pre-dilation

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether transfemoral implantation of the Acurate neo transcatheter heart valve without pre-dilation is feasible.

METHODS

Between December 2014 and December 2016, 294 patients were treated with the Acurate neo prosthesis at our center. Of these, 72 cases were performed without pre-dilation. The decision to omit pre-dilation was at the discretion of the operator, preferably in the case of mild to moderate aortic valve calcification (AVC). Propensity matching (1:1) resulted in 48 cases in each group. Main outcomes of interest were device success according to VARC-2 criteria, residual aortic regurgitation (AR) ≥ 2°, and rate of post-dilation.

RESULTS

Median [IQR] age in patients without pre-dilation was 82.7 years [78.6–85.6], STS score was 4.6% [3.4–6.1], and AVC-score was 1436 AU [1043–1682] with mild and moderate AVC in 63.9% and 36.1% of cases, respectively. Device success was achieved in 94.4% of cases, post-dilation was necessary in 26.4%, and one (1.4%) patient had moderate AR. In the matched population, there were no differences regarding device success, rate of AR ≥ 2°, need for post-dilation, and post-procedural mean gradient, but the group without pre-dilation had shorter procedure (34.0 min [27.0–38.8] vs. 43.0 min [34.3–52.0]; p < 0.001) and fluoroscopy times (7.4 min [5.7–9.0] vs. 9.9 min [7.9–13.5]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In select patients with mild to moderate AVC, transfemoral implantation of the Acurate neo without pre-dilation is feasible and safe. This allows for a straightforward procedure that may be performed without rapid pacing in the majority of cases.

A longer total duration of rapid ventricular pacing does not increase the risk of postprocedural myocardial injury in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) is used during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). RVP disturbs myocardial oxygen balance, and when prolonged, it may cause procedure-related myocardial injury (PMI). This study investigated whether a longer duration of RVP increased the occurrence of PMI or worsened long-term mortality after TAVI. We retrospectively analyzed data from 188 patients who underwent TAVI in our institute from January 2013 to July 2015. Myocardial injury was represented by the peak value of creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) within 72 h after the procedure; an increase greater than 5 times the upper reference limit was regarded as PMI. There was no difference in RVP time (RVPT) between patients with and without PMI (median [range]: 57 [9-189] s vs. 54 [0-159] s, p = 0.9). A higher peak CK-MB was significantly correlated with the apical approach for the procedure (p < 0.001) but not with total RVPT (p = 0.22). A subanalysis of 133 patients whose troponin I was tested within 72 h postprocedurally showed no correlation between the peak value and RVPT (p = 0.40). Shortening RVPT did not result in myocardial protection; thus, RVPT during TAVI should be sufficient to optimize valve placement.

Simplified Transapical Aortic Valve Implantation Using the SAPIEN 3 Valve Without Preballooning

OBJECTIVE

Preballooning (PB) of the stenotic aortic valve can be considered common standard during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (T-AVI). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation without preballooning (noPB) using the Edwards SAPIEN XT prosthesis has been described previously. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of next-generation SAPIEN 3 valve implantation without PB.

METHODS

Since January 2013, a total of 66 patients received SAPIEN 3 valve implantation at our center using the transapical approach. Patients were treated using the standard PB technique (n = 17 [25.8%]) or no PB (n = 49 [74.2%]).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of patient groups were comparable (38% women; mean age, 83 years; STS score, 8%, logistic EuroSCORE I and II, 30% and 8%, respectively). Patients in the PB group were exclusively treated in our earlier experience with this device. Overall 30-day mortality was 4.5% (6.1% for noPB vs. 0% PB; P = ns). Aortic regurgitation was grade 1 or less in 100% (PB) versus 93.9% (noPB); P = ns Median contrast use was 70 (60-95) mL (PB) versus 50 (40-50) mL (noPB); P < 0.001; and median radiation dose was 32.0 (17-57) Gy × cm (PB) versus 26.6 (16-36) Gy × cm (noPB); P < 0.001. Postdilatation was required in one patient only (noPB). The rate of new pacemaker implantations was 41.2% (PB) versus 12.2% (noPB); P = 0.03. Periprocedural stroke occurred in one patient in each group (6% PB vs 2.0% no-PB); P = ns.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct transapical SAPIEN 3 valve implantation without PB is feasible and safe. The no-PB technique leads to further simplification of the procedures.

Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on intraoperative left ventricular end-diastolic pressure

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for patients with aortic stenosis is a less invasive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement. Despite this, careful anesthetic management, especially strict control of blood pressure and fluid management, is necessary. During TAVI, normalization of left ventricular afterload due to aortic balloon valvuloplasty and prosthetic valve deployment is expected to result in rapid improvement of systolic function and consequent improvement in diastolic function. However, the early effect of TAVI on left ventricular diastolic function is less clear. We hypothesized that TAVI induces a rapid decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) after valve deployment. This retrospective observational study included 71 patients who had undergone TAVI using the transfemoral approach with a balloon-expandable valve under general anesthesia. Intraoperative LVEDP was measured using an intracardiac catheter. The severity of residual aortic regurgitation (AR) was assessed using the Sellers criteria. The mean (SD) LVEDP was 17.8 (5.3) mmHg just before TAVI and increased significantly to 27.3 (8.2) mmHg immediately after prosthetic valve deployment (p < 0.0001). The change in LVEDP was 8.7 (8.6) mmHg in patients with low residual AR (Sellers ≤1) and 11.0 (7.1) mmHg in those with high residual AR (Sellers ≥2); however, this difference was not significant. No correlation was found between the LVEDP change and intraoperative fluid balance. In conclusion, LVEDP increased significantly in the early period after valve deployment during TAVI, regardless of residual AR severity. It was suggested that the tolerability of fluid load could be reduced at that time.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: past, present and future

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is one of the most significant technological advances in cardiovascular medicine. It offers a safe alternative in high risk cardiac patients with proven durability, economical viability and survival advantage. Current trials may expand its application in intermediate or low risk groups.

Myocardial injury associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an important treatment option for elderly patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis whose risk is too high or prohibitive for conventional surgery. Despite notable progress during the past decade, continuous efforts directed at further improvement of procedural safety and performance are required, especially considering expanding indications for interventional treatment options among lower-risk populations. One issue that needs to be addressed is myocardial damage, which can frequently be observed after TAVI and has been linked to worse prognosis. Yet, knowledge concerning the underlying mechanisms and clinical impact remains scarce, and further investigation in this field is warranted. In this review, we provide a contemporary summary of the types of myocardial injury associated with TAVI, including access-related injury, mechanical trauma and ischemia, the role of myocardial biomarkers, and the impact on left ventricular function, with emphasis on potential mechanisms and clinical implications.

Safety, Feasibility, and Hemodynamic Effects of Mild Hypothermia in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The TAVR-CHILL Trial

The safety, feasibility, and hemodynamic effects of mild hypothermia (MH) induced by transnasal cooling were studied in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). MH is a common therapy following cardiac arrest and seems to have favorable effects in myocardial infarction and on hemodynamic stability. In TAVR, hemodynamic instability is common during rapid pacing. Twenty subjects undergoing TAVR were randomized 1:1 to hypothermia or normothermia. Hemodynamic endpoints were mean arterial blood pressure and required dosage of vasoactive and inotropic drugs. Patients were followed up at 6 months. All patients in the MH group (n=10) reached the target temperature of 34°C before first rapid pacing. Tympanic and urinary bladder temperature remained significantly lower in the MH group during the procedure. No adverse effects of cooling were observed. Mean arterial pressure was higher in the MH group (90±20 mm Hg) than in the control group (71±13 mm Hg) at the start of the procedure, at first rapid pacing (94±19 vs. 80±16 mm Hg), and at balloon aortic valvuloplasty (90±17 vs. 73±14 mm Hg). Less norepinephrine was administered to the hypothermia group. Transnasal cooling during TAVR was safe and well tolerated. We observed a more stable hemodynamic profile in the MH group, indicated by higher blood pressure and lower levels of vasoactive drugs required. A larger study of patients with severe ventricular dysfunction is required to more comprehensively investigate the hemodynamic effects of transnasal cooling in TAVR.

Predictors of Prolonged Hemodynamic Compromise After Valve Deployment During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk factors of prolonged hemodynamic compromise caused by rapid pacing for valve deployment during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-seven patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

INTERVENTIONS

The time after the end of rapid pacing until systolic arterial pressure and SvO2 recovery (systolic arterial pressure>90 mmHg and SvO2>65%) was defined as "the hemodynamic recovery time" and was measured from online anesthetic charts. The total study population was divided into 2 groups according to the recovery time (third quartile in all patients; 33 and 14 patients in the early and delayed recovery groups, respectively). Subsequently, the factors associated with prolonged hemodynamic compromise after rapid pacing for valve deployment were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Multivariate analysis identified left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (odds ratio, 0.774; 95% confidence interval, 0.608-0.915) and SvO2 (odds ratio, 0.748; 95% confidence interval, 0.590-0.868) as independent factors associated with prolonged hemodynamic compromise after rapid pacing for valve deployment.

CONCLUSIONS

SvO2 and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter were found to be significant independent predictors of prolonged hemodynamic compromise immediately after rapid pacing for valve deployment during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.