Successful support of biventricular heart failure patients by new EXCOR® Adult pumps with bileaflet valves: a prospective study

Current and future options for adult biventricular assistance: a review of literature

In cardiogenic shock various short-term mechanical assistances may be employed, including an Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenator and other non-dischargeable devices. Once hemodynamic stabilization is achieved and the patient evolves towards a persisting biventricular dysfunction or an underlying long-standing end-stage disease is present, aside from Orthotopic Heart Transplantation, a limited number of long-term therapeutic options may be offered. So far, only the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart and the Berlin Heart EXCOR (which is not approved for adult use in the United States unlike in Europe) are available for extensive implantation. In addition to this, the strategy providing two continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices is still off-label despite its widespread use. Nevertheless, every solution ensures at best a 70% survival rate (reflecting both the severity of the condition and the limits of mechanical support) with patients suffering from heavy complications and a poor quality of life. The aim of the present paper is to summarize the features, implantation techniques, and results of current devices used for adult Biventricular Mechanical Circulatory Support, as well as a glance to future options.

Wound Infections in Adult Patients after Berlin Heart® EXCOR Biventricular Assist Device Implantation

Simple Summary

Our study shows that the Berlin Heart^® EXCOR as a biventricular assist device in adult patients is an effective strategy in heart failure medicine. Our results may increase the use of the EXCOR with acceptable clinical outcomes despite long support times. With ongoing research to implement the EXCOR as a permanent right ventricular assist device, our results highlight possible arising complications.

Abstract

The Berlin Heart^® EXCOR is a paracorporeal, pulsatile ventricular assist device used in patients of all age groups. However, adolescent and adult patients on EXCOR support are scarcely explored. Herein, we present a detailed description of infectious complications in this patient cohort. From 2006 to 2020, 58 patients received a biventricular assist device (BiVAD) at our institution and were included in this study. Postoperative infections were assessed after BiVAD implantation and subsequent heart transplantation (HTx). A Berlin Heart^® EXCOR BiVAD was implanted as a bridge to transplantation in 58 patients (12–64 years). Most patients were INTERMACS I, and their median age was 49 years. Wound infections (WI) specific to the ventricular assist device (VAD) occurred in 31 (53.4%) patients with a mean time of 113 ± 155 days after BiVAD implantation. HTx was performed in 30 (51.7%) patients and thereof 10 (33.3%) patients developed at least one WI post-HTx. The mean time of WI after HTx was 17 ± 14 days. In four cases, WIs were caused by the same pathogen as before HTx. According to our institutional BiVAD wound classification, the mean wound score was 3. The VAD-specific wound infections were manageable and did not increase mortality nor precluded HTx in Berlin Heart^® EXCOR patients. No specific risk factors for VAD-specific wound infections could be identified.

Bridging patients in cardiogenic shock with a paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist device to heart transplantation-a single-centre experience

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the outcome of patients in cardiogenic shock receiving a paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-centre analysis of all patients who received a Berlin Heart Excor® at our institution between 2004 and 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients (90 adults, 7 paediatric) were analysed. Eighty-four patients were in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support level 1 (80 adults, 4 paediatric). Diagnoses were dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 41), ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n = 17) or myocardial infarction (n = 4), myocarditis (n = 15), restrictive cardiomyopathy (n = 2), graft failure after heart transplant (n = 7), postcardiotomy heart failure (n = 5), postpartum cardiomyopathy (n = 3), congenital heart disease (n = 1), valvular cardiomyopathy (n = 1) and toxic cardiomyopathy (n = 1). All patients were in biventricular heart failure and had secondary organ dysfunction. The mean duration of support was 63 days (0-487 days). There was a significant decrease in creatinine values after assist device implantation (from 1.83 ± 0.79 to 1.12 ± 0.67 mg/dl, P = 0.001) as well as a decrease in bilirubin values (from 3.94 ± 4.58 to 2.65 ± 3.61 mg/dl, P = 0.084). Cerebral stroke occurred in 16 patients, bleeding in 15 and infection in 13 patients. Forty-eight patients died on support, while 49 patients could be successfully bridged to transplantation. Thirty-day survival and 1-year survival were 70.1% and 41.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A pulsatile biventricular assist device is a reasonable therapeutic option in cardiogenic shock, when immediate high cardiac output is necessary to rescue the already impaired kidney and liver function of the patient.

The effect of paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist devices on allosensitization in adults: A comparison with left ventricular assist devices

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been associated with the development of anti-HLA antibodies ('allosensitization'), but data on devices providing biventricular support in adults are limited. We sought to characterize differences in anti-HLA antibody formation in adult patients receiving left- (LVAD) versus biventricular- (BiVAD) assist devices as bridge to transplantation (BTT) by retrospectively reviewing the records of adult patients who have undergone VAD implantation at our institution. We assessed 82 patients supported with a pulsatile-flow paracorporeal BiVAD and compared them with 40 patients receiving LVAD till 2018. Forty-eight (58.5%) of the BiVAD and 23 (57.5%) of the LVAD patients were eventually transplanted (p = 0.91) with an average time to transplantation 559 and 598 days, respectively (p = 0.73). Evidence of sensitization pre-VAD was found in 11.0% of the BiVAD patients and 15.0% of the LVAD ones (p = 0.53); these percentages rose to 43.9% (p < 0.001) and 40.0% (p = 0.01), respectively. The post-VAD sensitization status was not significantly different between the BiVAD and the LVAD group (p = 0.68). De novo sensitization was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.55). Post-transplantation outcomes regarding rejections and cardiac allograft vasculopathy were also similar. Conclusively, BiVAD- and LVAD- induced allosensitization do not appear to differ significantly.

COVID-19 among heart transplant recipients in Germany: a multicenter survey

Aims

Heart transplantation may represent a particular risk factor for severe coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to chronic immunosuppression and frequent comorbidities. We conducted a nation-wide survey of all heart transplant centers in Germany presenting the clinical characteristics of heart transplant recipients with COVID-19 during the first months of the pandemic in Germany.

Methods and results

A multicenter survey of all heart transplant centers in Germany evaluating the current status of COVID-19 among adult heart transplant recipients was performed. A total of 21 heart transplant patients with COVID-19 was reported to the transplant centers during the first months of the pandemic in Germany. Mean patient age was 58.6 ± 12.3 years and 81.0% were male. Comorbidities included arterial hypertension (71.4%), dyslipidemia (71.4%), diabetes mellitus (33.3%), chronic kidney failure requiring dialysis (28.6%) and chronic-obstructive lung disease/asthma (19.0%). Most patients received an immunosuppressive drug regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (71.4%), mycophenolate mofetil (85.7%) and steroids (71.4%). Eight of 21 patients (38.1%) displayed a severe course needing invasive mechanical ventilation. Those patients showed a high mortality (87.5%) which was associated with right ventricular dysfunction (62.5% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.014), arrhythmias (50.0% vs. none; p = 0.012), and thromboembolic events (50.0% vs. none; p = 0.012). Elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T- and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide were significantly associated with the severe form of COVID-19 (p = 0.017 and p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

Severe course of COVID-19 was frequent in heart transplanted patients. High mortality was associated with right ventricular dysfunction, arrhythmias, thromboembolic events, and markedly elevated cardiac biomarkers.

Durable circulatory support with a paracorporeal device as an option for pediatric and adult heart failure patients

OBJECTIVES

Not all patients in need of durable mechanical circulatory support are suitable for a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. We describe patient populations who were treated with the paracorporeal EXCOR, including children with small body sizes, adolescents with complex congenital heart diseases, and adults with biventricular failure.

METHODS

Information on clinical data, echocardiography, invasive hemodynamic measurements, and surgical procedures were collected retrospectively. Differences between various groups were compared.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2018, a total of 50 patients (21 children and 29 adults) received an EXCOR as bridge to heart transplantation or myocardial recovery. The majority of patients had heart failure compatible with Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1. At year 5, the overall survival probability for children was 90%, and for adults 75% (P = .3). After we pooled data from children and adults, the survival probability between patients supported by a biventricular assist device was similar to those treated with a left ventricular assist device/ right ventricular assist device (94% vs 75%, respectively, P = .2). Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy had a trend toward better survival than those with other heart failure etiologies (92% vs 70%, P = .05) and a greater survival free from stroke (92% vs 64%, P = .01). Pump house exchange was performed in nine patients due to chamber thrombosis (n = 7) and partial membrane rupture (n = 2). There were 14 cases of stroke in eleven patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite severe illness, patient survival on EXCOR was high, and the long-term overall survival probability following heart transplantation and recovery was advantageous. Treatment safety was satisfactory, although still hampered by thromboembolism, mechanical problems, and infections.

Permanent Implantable Cardiac Support Systems

BACKGROUND

Nearly 1000 permanent ventricular assist devices (VADs) are implanted in patients with severe congestive heart failure in Germany each year. VADs are miniaturized centrifugal pumps that generate continuous blood flow; they are powered and controlled through a cable that passes through the skin. Para- corporeal systems are only rarely implanted, usually in children.

METHODS

In this selective review of the literature, including guidelines and registry data, we discuss the indications, therapeutic effects, and complications of permanently implantable cardiac support systems.

RESULTS

The optimal time for VAD implantation cannot be precisely defined. A comparative assessment of the various available systems is not possible, as no randomized trials have been performed on this topic. Registry data indicate that 69% to 81% of patients survive one year after VAD implantation, which is signifi- cantly better than the natural course of (conservatively treated) severe congestive heart failure. The distance patients are able to walk is 129 to 220 m longer at six months, depending on the system implanted. Scores on the EQ-5D health status questionnaire are 28 to 37 points better at six months. The potential severe compli- cations include infection, right-heart failure, hemorrhage, pump thrombosis, stroke, and death.

CONCLUSION

A VAD system can be implanted as an alternative to cardiac transplan- tation or as a bridging treatment until the patient can be listed for transplantation and receive the transplant. Because of the organ s , only a minority of VAD patients ever receive a transplant.

2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support

Long-term mechanical circulatory support (LT-MCS) is an important treatment modality for patients with severe heart failure. Different devices are available, and many-sometimes contradictory-observations regarding patient selection, surgical techniques, perioperative management and follow-up have been published. With the growing expertise in this field, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) recognized a need for a structured multidisciplinary consensus about the approach to patients with LT-MCS. However, the evidence published so far is insufficient to allow for generation of meaningful guidelines complying with EACTS requirements. Instead, the EACTS presents an expert opinion in the LT-MCS field. This expert opinion addresses patient evaluation and preoperative optimization as well as management of cardiac and non-cardiac comorbidities. Further, extensive operative implantation techniques are summarized and evaluated by leading experts, depending on both patient characteristics and device selection. The faculty recognized that postoperative management is multidisciplinary and includes aspects of intensive care unit stay, rehabilitation, ambulatory care, myocardial recovery and end-of-life care and mirrored this fact in this paper. Additionally, the opinions of experts on diagnosis and management of adverse events including bleeding, cerebrovascular accidents and device malfunction are presented. In this expert consensus, the evidence for the complete management from patient selection to end-of-life care is carefully reviewed with the aim of guiding clinicians in optimizing management of patients considered for or supported by an LT-MCS device.

Short-term mechanical circulatory support as bridge to heart transplantation: paracorporeal ventricular assist device as alternative to extracorporeal life support

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is generally considered to be the treatment of choice for bridging to heart transplantation (HTx) patients with cardiogenic shock; however, alternative mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have been proposed with satisfactory results and, among those, paracorporeal systems have demonstrated to be safe and effective. This technology has been used for decades as bridge to transplant, especially in patients with advanced right ventricular dysfunction or evidence of multiorgan failure (MOF), which could be difficult to manage with an isolated left ventricular support. Paracorporeal systems are defined by having the pump located outside of the body, with inflow and outflow cannulas that traverse the skin connecting the pump with the heart and great vessels. They can be utilised in a uni- or bi-ventricular configuration and can provide pulsatile or continuous flow, depending on the device technology (pneumatic vs. centrifugal). In particular, pneumatic devices allow for patient mobilization and hospital discharge, improving rehabilitation and organ recovery while bridging to transplant. In our institution at the University Hospital of Udine, 34 pneumatic paracorporeal ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been implanted since 1998: in most cases (32 pts), as biventricular support for patients in INTERMACS class I-II. After a median support time of 34 (range, 0-385) days, with 19 patients (56%) supported for more than 1 month, 23 patients (68%) underwent HTx and 3 (9%) were successfully weaned to hospital discharge, resulting in an overall combined 76% survival to HTx or weaning. After transplant, the survival rate was similar to the one of the patients not bridged with MCS. In conclusion, pneumatic VADs can effectively assist patients with severe biventricular failure, especially those with contraindications to ECLS or expected long waiting times for HTx. Moreover, they can potentially result in hospital discharge, optimal organ and patient recovery and donor-recipient matching, resulting in a satisfactory transplant outcome.

Transfemoral aortic valve replacement for severe aortic valve regurgitation in a patient with a pulsatile-flow biventricular assist device

Severe aortic regurgitation (AR) is a rare but significant complication of ventricular assist device therapy. Experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in this setting of patients is very limited, while the scarcely reported cases exclusively refer to TAVR under continuous‐flow left ventricular assist devices. Here, we present the first successful TAVR while running a pulsatile‐flow biventricular assist device (PF‐BiVAD). Clinical data were collected based on the patient's electronic medical records after the patient's consent was obtained. We describe the case of a 57‐year‐old man in whom a PF‐BiVAD (EXCOR, Berlin Heart, Berlin, Germany) had been initially inserted after fulminant myocarditis with subsequent severe dilated cardiomyopathy as bridge‐to‐transplantation therapy. Over the following 2 years, the patient developed severe de novo AR under PF‐BiVAD therapy. This, along with progressive cardiac decompensation, led to the decision for TAVR by our heart team as a minimal invasive approach for severe AR. TAVR using two Edwards SAPIEN 3 bioprostheses as a valve‐in‐valve procedure resulted in a significant reduction of AR from severe to mild, with trace paravalvular leakage and without significant pressure gradients. The patient underwent total orthotopic heart transplantation afterwards. This is the first report of successful TAVR in a patient with severe de novo AR while running a PF‐BiVAD.

Long-term effects of device-guided slow breathing in stable heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction

Background

Slow breathing (SLOWB) alleviates symptoms of chronic heart failure (HF) but its long-term effects are unknown. We examined the acute and long-term impact of device-guided breathing on hemodynamics and prognostic parameters in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods and results

Twenty-one patients with HFrEF (23.9 ± 5.8%, SD ± mean) on optimal medical therapy underwent blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), HR variability, 6-min walk test (6MWT), cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and echocardiography measurements before and 3 months after SLOWB home training (30 min daily). After 3 months, all patients were assigned to continue SLOWB (Group 1) or no-SLOWB (Group 2). All tests were repeated after 6 months. Acute SLOWB (18 ± 5 vs 8 ± 2 breaths/min, P < 0.001) had no influence on BP and HR but improved saturation (97 ± 2 vs 98 ± 2%, P = 0.01). Long-term SLOWB reduced office systolic BP (P < 0.001) but not central or ambulatory systolic BP. SLOWB reduced SDNN/RMSSD ratio (P < 0.05) after 3 months. One-way repeated measures of ANOVA revealed a significant increase in 6MWT and peak RER (respiratory exchange ratio) from baseline to 6-month follow-up in group 1 (P < 0.05) but not group 2 (P = 0.85 for 6MWT, P = 0.69 for RER). No significant changes in echocardiography were noted at follow-up. No HF worsening, rehospitalisation or death occurred in group 1 out to 6-month follow-up. Two hospitalizations for HF decompensation and two deaths ensued in group 2 between 3- and 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions

SLOWB training improves cardiorespiratory capacity and appears to slow the progression of HFrEF. Further long-term outcome studies are required to confirm the benefits of paced breathing in HFrEF.