Risk of cardiac arrhythmias after electrical accident: a single-center study of 480 patients

Acute myocardial infarction due to accidental electrocution — A case report of a 26-year-old African male patient

We report a case of fatal myocardial infarction (MI) after electrocution in a 26-year-old male patient without cardiovascular risk factors. The patient was admitted to the Emergency Department of the University Clinics of Lubumbashi for management of accidental electrocution on a high-voltage power line. The admission ECG showed lesions consistent with myocardial infarction. Despite treatment, the patient died 30 minutes after admission.

[HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL INJURIES IN CHILDREN: A TUNISIAN SERIES]

Electrical burn injuries (EBI) affect both adults and children and are responsible for a very high number of major limb amputations. Their management is still a major challenge. This retrospective review concerns 42 children, admitted to an intensive burn care department in Tunisia for high electrical burns, from January 2016 to September 2022. The average age of our patients was 12 years, with a male predominance (90.5%). Electrotrauma was accidental in the majority of cases (93%) and secondary to a domestic accident in 54.8% of cases. Total body surface area was 19%. Burns were second degree in 2/3 of cases and third degree in 1/3 of cases. The most affected areas were distal extremities in 2/3 of the cases. Rhabdomyolysis was observed in 93% of cases and troponins were elevated in half of the patients. Escharotomy was required in 38% of cases. Amputation was performed in 18 children (43%): one limb (n=10); 2 limbs (n=6) and 3 limbs (n=2). The outcome was favorable in 9 children (21.4%); functional and cosmetic sequelae with an impact on schooling and psychology were reported in 25 cases. Mortality was 16.7%.

Reversibility of Sinus Bradycardia-Induced Syncope Resulting From Low-Voltage Electrical Injury: A Case Report

Electric shocks pose a serious threat to public health. The heart is among the organs that are most commonly impacted. Electrical harm can cause a number of potentially fatal heart conditions, including asystole, ventricular fibrillation, and myocardial rupture. Some patients had sinus bradycardia diagnosed at the time of admission. In this case report, we describe a 43-year-old male patient who had an electrical injury that resulted in syncope and sinus bradycardia. After 24 hours of cardiac monitoring, the patient was found to not require a pacemaker. This suggests that patients with symptomatic sinus bradycardia should have cardiac monitoring. If, after 24 hours, cardiac monitoring revealed no new episodes of sinus bradycardia and the patient remained asymptomatic, the patient is unlikely to require a pacemaker. There are differing guidelines and suggestions regarding the supervision of patients following electrical damage, and further study in this area is necessary to enable the unification of guidelines.

Arrhythmias and laboratory abnormalities after an electrical accident: a single-center, retrospective study of 333 cases

BACKGROUND

Even though electrical injuries are common in the emergency room, guidelines, consensus, and general recommendations for the management of these patients do not exist in Europe. Documented cases of delayed arrhythmias are rare and their connection with electrical injury has not been fully confirmed. We also use cardio-specific markers for the risk stratification of myocardial injury, but there is no significant study referring to their utility in this clinical situation. These reasons led us to retrospectively analyze all cases of electrical injuries over 23 years to determine the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias (mainly malignant arrhythmias and delayed arrhythmias).

METHODS

We retrospectively searched all patients admitted to the University Hospital in Pilsen, CZ, with a diagnosis of electric injury (ICD diagnostic code T754) from 1997 to 2020. The hospital´s information system was used to research the injury; data were drawn from patient medical records.

RESULTS

We identified 333 cases of electrical injury in our hospital. Men accounted for about two-thirds, and women one-third. Children accounted for about one-third of cases. Most were low-voltage injuries (< 1000 V, 91.6%). All participants had an initial ECG, and 77.5% of patients had continuous ECG monitoring, usually lasting 24 h. Cardiac arrhythmias were noticed in 39 patients (11.7%). The most frequent arrhythmias were: ventricular fibrillation, sinus tachycardia, bradycardia and arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, and supraventricular tachycardia. The ECG showed cardiac conduction abnormalities in 28 patients (8.1%), and ten patients (3%) had supraventricular or ventricular extrasystoles. In ten cases (3%), we found changes in ST segments and T waves on the initial ECG. Thirty-one patients (9.3%) suffered a loss of consciousness and 50 patients (15.02%) reported paresthesia. The most frequent ion disbalances were hypokalemia (18%) and hypocalcemia (3.3%). Patients with an ion disbalance had significantly more arrhythmias and newly diagnosed cardiac conduction abnormalities. Troponin levels (cTnI or hs-cTnT) were measured in 258 cases (77.48%) and found to be elevated above the 99th percentile in 19 cases (5.7%). Almost one-third of patients had burns of various degrees of seriousness, and 41 patients (12.3%) had concomitant traumatic injuries. Eleven patients underwent pre-hospital resuscitation, three died in the hospital, and another died as result of intracranial hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

All malignant arrhythmias occurred immediately after the electrical injury, delayed life-threatening arrhythmias were not observed, and no predictive factors of malignant arrhythmias were found. While elevations of cardiac troponins were observed sporadically, they did not appear helpful for risk stratification. In patients with arrhythmias, ion disbalance may be more critical. We concluded that asymptomatic, uninjured adult and pediatric patients with normal initial ECG findings do not need continuous ECG monitoring and may be discharged home. Recommendations for high-risk patients and patients with mild ECG abnormalities at admission are less obvious.

Low-voltage electrical injuries and the electrocardiogram: is a 'normal' electrocardiogram sufficient for safe discharge from care? A systematic review

Introduction

The current Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee guidelines in the United Kingdom provide clear national guidance for low-voltage electrical injury patients. While patients can be considered safe to discharge with an apparently 'normal' initial electrocardiogram (ECG), some evidence questions the safety profile of these patients with a risk of a 'delayed arrhythmia'. This review aims to examine this as well as identifying the frequency and common arrhythmias that require patients to be conveyed to hospital for further monitoring post electrical injury. It will also aim to improve the understanding of potentially clinically significant arrhythmias that may require clinical intervention or even admission within an in-hospital environment.

Methods

A systematic review using three electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, AMED) was conducted in January 2022. A preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) approach was used to identify relevant studies with a suitable quality to support a critical review of the topic. A modified Critical Appraisal Skills Programme quality assessment checklist was used across suitable studies and a descriptive statistics approach was adopted to present the findings.

Results

Seven studies, largely retrospective reviews, met the inclusion criteria. The findings showed 26% of patients had an arrhythmia on initial presentation (n = 364/1234) with incidences of sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia and premature ventricular contractions. However, making definitive statements is challenging due to the lack of access to individual patients' past ECGs. Within these arrhythmias' ST segment changes, atrial fibrillation and long QT syndrome could be considered potentially significant, however associated prognosis with these and electrical injuries is unknown. Only six (0.5%) patients required treatment by drug therapy, and a further three died from associated complications. Most patients with a normal ECG were discharged immediately with only a limited follow-up. No presentation of a 'delayed arrhythmia' was identified throughout the studies.

Conclusion

The data for low-voltage electrical injuries are limited, but the potential arrhythmias for this patient group seldom require intervention. The entity of the 'delayed arrhythmia' may not be a reason to admit or monitor patients for prolonged periods. Further studies should consider the safety profile of discharging a patient with a normal ECG.

Low-Dose Electrocution and Atrial Fibrillation

Emergency electrocution incidents present with various injuries, which can range from minor to severe injuries including death. Cardiac-related complications have a higher mortality incidence among patients with low-voltage injuries (M. R. Zemaitis et al., 2023). When managing electrical injury patients, the literature recommends managing them as both trauma and cardiac cases. However, the diagnostic approach is based on each individual case and patient presentation. Electrical injury complications include arrhythmias, myocardial tissue damage, and conduction disturbances (Pilecky et al., 2019). The purpose of this case study is to discuss a postelectrocution atrial fibrillation case and common related arrhythmias associated with electrical injuries.

Successful Management of an Occupational High-Voltage Electric Injury Associated With High-Risk Factors and a Clinically Significant Arrhythmia

Electric injuries are uncommon but can lead to numerous long-term complications as well as death. Occupational exposure is the most common cause of injury among the affected population. Both low-voltage and high-voltage electrocution are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with certain presentations are at a high risk of arrhythmia post-injury. Here, we discuss the presentation and management of high-voltage electrocution in a 35-year-old electrician.

A Review of Electrocardiography Changes in Electrical Burn Injury: Is It Time To Revise Protocol?

This descriptive cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate electrocardiography (ECG) changes in patients with electrical burn injury and determine their predictive extent during hospitalization. The study population consisted of all patients with electrical injury admitted to Velayat Hospital, Rasht, Iran, during 2007-2019. The ECG information of all patients assessed by a cardiologist in terms of dysrhythmic and ischemic changes at the time of admission, demographic information including age, gender, voltage, the severity and path of the current, and degree of burn were recorded in the relevant checklist. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 18 (IBM, USA). Out of 192 studied patients, 183 (95%) were male, and the mean age of patients was 32 years. The ECGs of 167 patients were normal (86%), 13 cases had arrhythmia (6.7%), and 12 individuals had ischemia (6.2%). Arrhythmic and ischemic abnormalities in the ECGs of patients had no predictive value during hospitalization (P<0.05). Heart injury caused by electrical injury may be deadly in some cases, and it can be complicated to save the patient. Moreover, the predictive value of ECG in predicting the consequences and duration of hospitalization is weak.

Low-voltage electrical accidents, immediate reactions and acute health care associated with self-reported general health 4 years later

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Electricians frequently experience low-voltage electrical accidents. Some such accidents involve long-term negative health consequences. Early identification of victims at risk for long-term injury may improve acute medical treatment and long-term follow-up. This study aimed to determine acute exposure, health effects and treatment associated with general health ≥ 2 years after low-voltage electrical accidents.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 89 male electricians who had experienced an electrical accident between 1994 and 2001 participated in a 2003 follow-up health examination. They were identified from a registry of low-voltage electrical accidents and included in the study. Based on exposure descriptions in the original accident reports, they were stratified into the following three groups: a current arc accident group (N = 34, mean age 38.8 years [standard deviation, SD = 12.2, range = 21-59]) and two groups with the passage of current through the body, either fixed to the current source ("no-let-go" group; N = 35, mean age 34.0 years [SD = 10.5, range = 21-57]) or not ("let-go" group; N = 20, mean age = 38.7 years [SD = 10.3, range = 21-63]). They retrospectively described acute reactions and assessed their current general health at the health examination. Multivariate linear regression, ordinal logistic regression and Fisher's exact test were used to compare acute reactions with health at follow-up in each exposure group.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis indicated that after accidents with the passage of current through the body, severe acute headache (β = - 0.56, p = 0.013), years since the accident (β = - 0.16, p = 0.017) and the accident being perceived as frightening (β = - 0.48, p = 0.040) were negatively associated with general health ≥ 2 years later (R² = 0.25, p = 0.002). If the exposure included a no-let-go experience, then acute severe body numbness (β = - 0.53, p = 0.029) was also negatively associated with general health (R² = 0.38, p = 0.002). Without such experience, only acute confusion (β = - 0.90, p = 0.029) was negatively associated with the health at follow-up (R² = 0.24, p = 0.029). In univariate analyses, after the passage of current through the body, acute dizziness (p = 0.029), apathy (p = 0.028), confusion (p = 0.007) and irregular heartbeat (p ≤ 0.05) were associated with poor long-term general health. The no-let-go group, more often than the let-go group, reported panic (p = 0.001), fear of death (p = 0.029), confusion (p = 0.014), exhaustion (p = 0.009), bodily numbness (p = 0.013) and immediate unconsciousness (p = 0.019). Acute symptoms beyond the first day after a current arc accident were associated with poor long-term general health (p = 0.015).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The acute reactions negatively associated with general health ≥ 2 years after low-voltage electrical accidents should alert the clinician in the acute phase after an electrical accident to the risk of developing negative long-term health effects. Future studies should specify long-term health beyond the concept of general health.

Clinical Evaluation of Nerve Function in Electrical Accident Survivors with Persisting Neurosensory Symptoms

Objective: Work related electrical accidents are prevalent and can cause persisting symptoms. We used clinical neurophysiological techniques to assess neurosensory function following electrical accidents and correlated test results with the patients’ symptoms. Methods: We studied 24 patients who reported persisting neurosensory symptoms following a workplace electrical accident. We assessed nerve function using quantitative sensory testing (QST), thermal roller testing, laser evoked potential (LEP), and electroneurography. The patients’ results were compared with previously established normative data. Results: Altogether, 67% of the patients showed at least one neurosensory impairment with a large heterogeneity in test results across patients. At a group level, we observed significant deviations in in QST, LEP, and sensory and motor neurography. Overall, we found a weak correlation between test results and self-reported symptoms. Conclusions: In a majority of patients with neurosensory symptoms after a workplace electrical accident, neurosensory testing confirmed the existence of an underlying impairment of the nervous system.

Use of troponin assay after electrical injuries: a 15-year multicentre retrospective cohort in emergency departments

Background

Patients with electrical injury are considered to be at risk of cardiac arrhythmia. Assessing the risk of developing a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) is the cornerstone of patient management. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of initial troponin and troponin rise to predict Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs) in all patients with electrical injuries admitted to the Emergency Department.

Methods

This is a multicentre retrospective study in which consecutive patients with electrical injuries admitted to the Emergency Departments (ED) (adult and paediatric) of five French Hospitals were included between 2005 and 2019. The threshold for troponin elevation is based on the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for patients presenting without persistent ST segment elevation. The primary endpoint was the rate of MACE.

Results

A total of 785 included patients were admitted to ED with a first diagnosis of electrical injury during the study period. Troponin assays were performed in 533 patients (67.9%), including 465 of 663 adults (70.1%) and 68 of 122 children (55.7%) and 17/533 (3.2%) of patients had an initial elevated troponin. If none of the clinical criteria for MACE were present (i.e., previous known heart disease, exposure to a high voltage of ≥ 1000 Volts, initial loss of consciousness, or an abnormal initial ECG), this defined a low-risk subgroup (n = 573, 76.0%) that could be safely discharged. The initial positive troponin assay had a sensitivity of 83.3 (95% CI 35.9–99.6%), a specificity of 97.7 (95% CI 96.1–98.8%), a positive likelihood ratio 36.6 (95% CI 18.8–71.1%) and a negative predictive value of 99.9 (95% CI 99.2–99.9%) in predicting a MACE.

Conclusions

Troponin assay appears to be a predictive marker of MACE risk and should be considered in high-risk patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-021-00955-6.

ECG monitoring in high voltage electric injury patients presenting with normal ECG: Time to revisit practice?

Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) recommends prolonged ECG monitoring of patients with high risk factors post electric injuries, for detecting and treating potentially life threatening arrhythmias. We hereby present our experience of high voltage electric injuries (HVEI) patients with high risk factors, managed at a level 1 Trauma Centre. Seven patients of high voltage electric injuries with significant burns (BSA > 10% of 2nd degree and above) were admitted over a year (Jan 1, 2019 to Dec 31, 2019), age ranging from 11 to 51 (median 25 yrs). Six out of seven patients (85.7%) were males. Mode of injury was recreational in one, workplace related in one and accidental in five (71.4%). Six patients had entry wounds in extremities, and three underwent emergency limb saving surgery (all escharotomies). Three patients underwent eventual amputation of injured extremity. Serum creatine kinase was monitored in all and multisystem involvement was seen in three patients; one patient (referred) required haemodialysis due to renal failure. There was no mortality. In all cases, 24 h continuous ECG monitoring was carried out as per ATLS and ERC (European Resuscitation Council) guidelines. There was no episode of paroxysmal or persistent rhythm disturbance in our patients during in-hospital stay or follow up. Review of pertinent literature suggests similar experiences of other authors. HVEI is a rare injury and most centres have reported on their experience with small number of patients as in our study. Currently, continuous ECG monitoring post HVEI seems to be the safe practice for patients with cardiac co-morbidities. Further studies are required to find other subsets of HVEI patients likely to benefit from ECG monitoring, and the clinical significance of 'delayed arrhythmias' post HVEI.

Patient outcomes after electrical injury - a retrospective study

Introduction

People exposed to electrical injuries are often admitted to hospital for observation. Current evidence suggests that patients who have a normal ECG on admission after a low-voltage injury, with no loss of consciousness or initial cardiac arrest may be discharged home after a short observation time. Currently, there are no established standards for the duration of monitoring after electric shock, but 24 h of observation is the most commonly adopted approach. We carried out a retrospective study of patients admitted after electrical injuries to determine the in-hospital outcomes and 30-day mortality in these patients.

Methods

We performed a chart review of all patients with electrical injuries admitted to Østfold Hospital, Norway between the years 2001 and 2019, to determine in-hospital and 30-day mortality and the frequency of various cardiac and non-cardiac complications.

Results

Mean age of 465 included patients (88% males) was 31 years. Of all injuries, 329 (71%) were work-related, 17 (3.7%) involved loss of consciousness. Furthermore, 29/437 (6.6%) were high voltage (> 1000 V), and 243/401 (60.6%) were transthoracic injuries.

369 (79.4%) were discharged same day. None of the admitted patients died in hospital nor did any die within 30 days of admission, yielding a 30-day mortality of 0% (95% CI 0–0.8). At admission troponin was elevated in three (0.6%) patients, creatinine kinase (CK) in 30 (6.5%) and creatinine in six (1.3%). Electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities were described in 85 (18%) patients. No serious arrhythmias were detected.

When comparing high- vs low-voltage or transthoracic vs other injuries, there were no significant differences between most of the outcomes, except for more ECG abnormalities in the transthoracic group, whereas more patients had elevated CK, and fewer discharged the same day in high-voltage injuries.

Conclusion

No in-hospital nor 30-day mortality or serious arrhythmias were encountered in those who were assessed, regardless of the type of injury. Troponin and creatinine were rarely elevated. It seems that conscious patients admitted with a normal ECG following a low-voltage injury may safely be discharged home after a quick clinical assessment including ECG.

An unusual case of high-voltage electrical injury involving fractal wood burning

A 26-year-old female was brought to the emergency department after an apparent electrocution. She was unresponsive, pulseless, and found to be in ventricular fibrillation upon arrival. The patient achieved return of spontaneous circulation after defibrillation. Further examination showed partial to full thickness burns to both hands, right chest wall, and buttocks. She was stabilized and then transferred to a regional burn center for additional care. Further history revealed the patient had learned how to create art with Lichtenberg figures using a high-voltage transformer extracted from a home microwave oven and a wooden canvas, a process called fractal wood burning. There are countless online video tutorials that describe how to replicate this process; however, the dangers of this practice are frequently omitted and have now become a growing public health concern. This article hopes to expand on the previous single publication, discuss the exceedingly high mortality rate, motivate emergency medicine providers and other clinicians to publish cases related to fractal wood burning-related injuries, and promote public awareness of this perilous practice.

International Multi-Center Analysis of In-hospital Morbidity and Mortality of Low-Voltage Electrical Injuries

Background : Patients with high- and low-voltage electrical injuries differ in their clinical presentation from minor symptoms to life-threatening conditions. For an adequate diagnosis and treatment strategy a multidisciplinary team is often needed, due to the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation. To minimize costs and medical resources, especially for patients with mild symptoms presenting after low-voltage electrical injuries, risk stratification for the development of further complications is needed.

Methods : During 2012–2019 two independent patient cohorts admitted with electrical injuries in two maximum care university hospitals in Germany and Austria were investigated to quantify risk factors for prolonged treatment, the need of surgery and death in low-voltage injuries. High-voltage injuries were used as reference in the analysis of the low-voltage electrical injury.

Results : We analyzed 239 admitted patients with low-voltage (75%; 276 ± 118 V), high-voltage (17%; 12.385 ± 28.896 V) or unclear voltage (8%). Overall mortality was 2% (N = 5) associated only with high-voltage injuries. Patients with low-voltage injuries presented with electrocution entry marks (63%), various neurological symptoms (31%), burn injuries (at least second degree) (23%), pain (27%), and cardiac symptoms (9%) including self-limiting thoracic pain and dysrhythmia without any therapeutic need. Seventy three percentage of patients with low-voltage injury were discharged within 24 h. The remaining patients stayed in the hospital (11 ± 10 days) for treatment of entry marks and burns, with an overall need for surgery of 12% in all low-voltage injuries.

Conclusions : The only identified risk factors for prolonged hospital stay in patients with low-voltage electrical injuries were the treatment of burns and electric marks. In this multi-center analysis of hospitalized patients, low-voltage electrical injuries were not associated with cardiac arrhythmia or mortality. Therefore, we suggest that asymptomatic patients, without preexisting conditions, with low-voltage injury can be discharged after an initial check-up without prolonged monitoring.

A Case Report: Low Voltage Electric Injuries Culminating in Cardiac Arrest and Direct Lung Injury

Serious electrical injuries are rare but may have life-threatening consequences. Voltage exposure injuries are divided into low voltage injury (LVI) or high voltage injury (HVI). An LVI current can result in severe injury, depending on the length of exposure, the size of the individual, the cross-sectional area in contact with the electrical source, and environmental humidity.

The authors present a 31-year-old male with accidental electrocution with low voltage current and cardiopulmonary arrest. A detailed revision by organs and systems is presented.

LVI is uncommon and can occur with a variety of clinical presentations, rarely presenting with direct lung injury. Early recognition and support are the cornerstones of treatment.

Machine learning-based risk prediction of intrahospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI

BACKGROUND

Currently, patient selection in TAVI is based upon a multidisciplinary heart team assessment of patient comorbidities and surgical risk stratification. In an era of increasing need for precision medicine and quickly expanding TAVI indications, machine learning has shown promise in making accurate predictions of clinical outcomes. This study aims to predict different intrahospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI using a machine learning-based approach. The main clinical outcomes include all-cause mortality, stroke, major vascular complications, paravalvular leakage, and new pacemaker implantations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The dataset consists of 451 consecutive patients undergoing elective TAVI between February 2014 and June 2016. The applied machine learning methods were neural networks, support vector machines, and random forests. Their performance was evaluated using five-fold nested cross-validation. Considering all 83 features, the performance of all machine learning models in predicting all-cause intrahospital mortality (AUC 0.94-0.97) was significantly higher than both the STS risk score (AUC 0.64), the STS/ACC TAVR score (AUC 0.65), and all machine learning models using baseline characteristics only (AUC 0.72-0.82). Using an extreme boosting gradient, baseline troponin T was found to be the most important feature among all input variables. Overall, after feature selection, there was a slightly inferior performance. Stroke, major vascular complications, paravalvular leakage, and new pacemaker implantations could not be accurately predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning has the potential to improve patient selection and risk management of interventional cardiovascular procedures, as it is capable of making superior predictions compared to current logistic risk scores.

The mystery of "missing" visits in an emergency cardiology department, in the era of COVID-19.; a time-series analysis in a tertiary Greek General Hospital

BACKGROUND

In the era of the current COVID-19 health crisis, the aim of the present study was to explore population behavior as regards the visits in the Εmergency Cardiology department (ECD) of a tertiary General Hospital that does not hospitalize SARS-CoV-2 infected patients METHODS AND RESULTS: Daily number of visits at the EDC and admissions to Cardiology Wards and Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary General Hospital, in Athens, Greece, were retrieved from hospital's database (January 1st-April 30th 2018, 2019 and 2020). A highly significant reduction in the visits at ECD of the hospital during March and April 2020 was observed as compared with January and February of the same year (p for linear trend < ·001); in particular the number of visits was 41.1% lower in March 2020 and 32.7% lower in April 2020, as compared to January 2020. As the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases throughout the country increased (i.e., from February 26th to April 2nd) the number of visits at ECD decreased (p = 0.01), whereas, the opposite was observed in the period afterwards (p = 0.01).The number of acute Myocardial infarctions (MI) cases in March 2020 was the lowest compared to the entire three year period (p < 0·001); however, the number of acute MI cases in April 2020 was doubled as compared to March 2020, but still was lower than the preceding years (p < 0·001).

CONCLUSIONS

It is hard to explain the mystery of the "missing" emergency hospital visits. However, if this decline in cardiovascular disease related hospital visits is "true", it is something that needs to be rigorously studied, to learn how to keep these rates down.

Evaluating the risks of arrhythmia following electrical injury: Two cases of electrical injuries in the upper limbs

Electrical injuries induce ventricular arrhythmias, which are lethal. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the risk of arrhythmias at initial presentation to the emergency department in cases of electrical injuries. Here, we report two cases with electrical injuries, where current flowed between the upper limbs, requiring 24-h hospitalization for arrhythmia monitoring. The patients were 57- and 30-year-old men, who sustained separate electrical injuries (6600 V, line voltage), with current flow from one hand to the other. They did not develop any ventricular arrhythmias during hospitalization and were discharged. The risk for ventricular arrhythmias is lower for electrical injuries occurring between the upper limbs than for those occurring between the upper and lower limbs. We conclude that 24-h hospitalization for monitoring of patients with electrical injuries of the upper limbs may be sufficient.