Long-term trends in rheumatology care : Achievements and deficits in 25 years of the German national rheumatology database

[Current patient care of systematic lupus erythematosus in Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland]

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a clinically heterogeneous autoimmune disease that is associated with great suffering for those affected, as well as high socioeconomic costs. Early diagnosis and adequate medical care are essential for a mild course of the disease. However, there is a lack of current figures and data on the care situation of patients in the area.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 1546 general practitioners, rheumatologists, neurologists, nephrologists and dermatologists in Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland were interviewed by fax or mail using a questionnaire regarding epidemiology, symptoms, therapy and therapy success. In addition, there was the possibility of making suggestions for improvement.

RESULTS

Five out of six of the 635 reported SLE patients were female. The most common main symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, myalgia, and skin changes. Of the patients, 68% received antimalarials (AMs), whereas 46% were treated with glucocorticoids (GCs) and 50% with an immunosuppressant (IS), mainly methotrexate. In terms of comorbidities, patients suffered mainly from cardiovascular disease, fibromyalgia syndrome and depression. Rheumatologists also frequently described anaemia, diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis.

DISCUSSION

Compared with guideline recommendations, the low rate of AMs in therapy was particularly striking in patients not treated by rheumatologists (35% on average compared with 81% for rheumatologists). Additionally, (sustained) high doses of GCs are not in line with literature recommendations. In the free text field, the main requests were for more rheumatologists in private practice and faster appointment scheduling, as well as better communication and networking. In addition, the desire for more training and education was frequently expressed..

Trends in health care of patients with vasculitides, including giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis and Behçet's disease: cross-sectional data of the German National Database 2007-2021

The aim of this study is to present the current care situation of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), Takayasu arteritis (TAK), ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and Behçet's disease (BD). Trends over the last 15 years will reflect improvements and remaining deficits in the management of vasculitides. Consecutive cross-sectional data from patients with vasculitides from the German National Database (NDB) of the Collaborative Arthritis Centres between 2007 and 2021 were included. Medication, physician- and patient-reported outcomes on disease activity and disease burden, inpatient stays and occupational participation are compared for different vasculitis entities and over time. Employment rates were compared to German population rates. Between 502 and 854 vasculitis patients were annually documented. GCA and AAV were the most common vasculitides. Median disease duration ranged from 2 to 16 years. Over the years, glucocorticoids decreased in proportion and dose, most markedly in GCA and TAK, while biologic therapies increased up to 27%. Physicians rated disease activity as low for the vast majority of patients, while patients-reported moderate outcomes in many dimensions. PROs remained largely unchanged. The proportion of employed patients (< 65 years) increased from 47 to 57%. In recent years, biologics are increasingly used in patients with vasculitides, while glucocorticoids decreased significantly. PRO's have not improved. Work participation increased but remains lower than that in the German population.

Time interval between the onset of connective tissue disease symptoms and first contact with a rheumatologist: results from the German National Database of collaborative arthritis centers

The long-term outcome of connective tissue diseases is associated with the time from symptom onset to diagnosis. To understand gaps in care, we determine whether the length of time between symptom onset and first presentation to a rheumatologist has changed in Germany in recent decades. We analyzed data on patients diagnosed with connective tissue diseases (n = 19,662) collected from the German National Database of the Regional Cooperative Rheumatology Centers. We reviewed the onset of relevant symptoms listed at first presentations from 1993 to 2018 and performed a quantitative analysis of the intervals until first presentation to a rheumatologist. We compared time intervals and performed a linear mixed regression model with random effects to identify associated factors. Although the interval between the onset of symptoms and first presentation to a rheumatologist has diminished since 1980 for all connective tissue diseases, there has been no relevant improvement during the past 2 decades. The interval between symptoms and presentation increases with patients age for all connective tissue diseases (e.g., Systemic sclerosis; for each 10-year-increment of patients age: β 0.41, CI 0.38; 0.44). Among those diagnosed with systemic sclerosis, the mean interval was 1.5 years (95% CI 1.1; 1.8) for male patients and 2.6 years (95% CI 2.4; 2.8) for females. Patients presenting with different degrees of disease severity on their first visits and with different educational levels had similar mean intervals between symptoms and first presentation regardless of their final diagnoses. Over the past 2 decades, the time to first consultation with a rheumatologist has not continued to improve in Germany, but has stagnated at the same level. Selected patient subgroups, such as older patients with suspected connective tissue diseases and female patients with suspected systemic sclerosis, are at risk to present late and may in particular benefit from an earlier referral to a rheumatologist.

[With RheMIT rheumatology centers can participate in the German national database-Expansion of the long-term rheumatological documentation]

The national database (NDB) of the German regional collaborative rheumatology centers was switched to the RheMIT documentation software last year. Rheumatology centers that already use RheMIT for care contracts or other research projects can therefore use the software to also participate in the NDB. Experiences from a hospital, a medical care center and a specialist practice show how the changeover to RheMIT from an existing documentation system or a new participation in the NDB with RheMIT can be implemented. The NDB team at the German Rheumatism Research Center in Berlin (DRFZ) welcomes new participating rheumatology centers.

Comparative Efficacy Randomized Controlled Trials in Rheumatology Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Comparative efficacy randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compare two active interventions in a head-to-head design. They are useful for informing clinical practice guidelines, but the degree to which such trials inform clinical practice guidelines in rheumatology is unknown.

METHODS

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) websites were searched from January 1, 2017, to June 12, 2021, for clinical practice guidelines. RCTs referenced by each guideline were identified, and information regarding design and outcomes were extracted. Clinical practice recommendations from each guideline were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen ACR- and nine EULAR-endorsed guidelines were included, which cited 609 RCTs and provided 481 recommendations. Referenced RCTs enrolled an average of 418 patients (SD 985), most commonly evaluated biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (70.1%), and infrequently used a head-to-head design (28%). A minority of recommendations received a high level of evidence (LOE) by the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology (2.9%) or an "A" grade by the Oxford Centre for Evidence based Medicine Standards (OCEBM) methodology (28.9%). LOE was higher for recommendations informed by RCTs (P < 0.001) or head-to-head RCTs (P = 0.008). Many recommendations received a strong recommendation despite low (8 [2.6%]) or very low (25 [8.3%]) LOE.

CONCLUSION

Less than one in six rheumatology guideline recommendations are informed by head-to-head RCTs. Recommendations that were informed by head-to-head RCTs were more likely to have a high LOE by both GRADE and OCEBM. Efforts to introduce more comparative efficacy RCTs should be undertaken.

Is the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score a meaningful instrument for other inflammatory rheumatic diseases? A cross-sectional analysis of data from the German National Database

To analyse the performance of the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) score in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, polymyalgia rheumatica, systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjögren’s syndrome, idiopathic inflammatory myositis and systemic sclerosis, as compared with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

A total of 12 398 patients from the German National Database were included. For each diagnosis, we calculated age-adjusted/sex-adjusted partial correlation coefficients between RAID and patient global (PtGl) health, PtGl disease activity, physician global (PhGl) disease activity, Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). As a measure of agreement, the mean differences between the RAID and other outcomes were compared with the respective differences for RA. The effect of each diagnosis on the difference between RAID and the other scores was assessed with linear regression, with RA as the reference.

Results

Across all diagnoses, RAID correlated strongly with PtGl health (0.71–0.83), moderately to strongly with PtGl disease activity (0.59–0.79), WHO-5 (0.65–0.81) and EQ-5D (0.68–0.73) and weakly with PhGl disease activity (0.23–0.38). Mean differences were calculated for RAID and PtGl disease activity (0 to −0.6), PtGl health (−0.4 to −0.9), WHO-5 (−0.7 to −1.3), EQ-5D (1.1 to 1.7) and PhGl disease activity (1.4 to 2.2). Discrepancies between other scores and RAID were comparable to RA. Linear regression revealed no clinically relevant effect of any of the diagnoses on the difference between RAID and the other outcomes.

Conclusion

The RAID score performs comparably across all diagnoses investigated. This supports the use of RAID for measuring the impact also of other rheumatic diseases.

[Celebrating 33 years of the DRFZ: Epidemiology and Health Services Research]

Der wissenschaftliche Fokus des Programmbereichs Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung des DRFZ liegt einerseits auf der Erforschung der Versorgungssituation rheumakranker Menschen in Deutschland einschließlich ihrer Defizite, Fortschritte und zeitlichen Trends. Andererseits ist ein wesentliches Ziel, durch die langfristige Beobachtung von Krankheitsverläufen in großen Kohorten Risikofaktoren für ungünstige Krankheitsverläufe, aber auch protektive Faktoren aufzudecken. Mit der Zulassung innovativer, zielgerichteter Therapien zu Beginn dieses Jahrtausends wurde die Thematik der Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit der verschiedenen antirheumatischen Therapien unter Alltagsbedingungen zu einer für Ärzte und Patienten vorrangigen Frage. Die Biologika-Register entwickelten sich zu zentralen Instrumenten des Programmbereichs, mit denen Fragen zur vergleichenden Therapiesicherheit, aber auch zur Therapiewirksamkeit und Reduktion von Risiken durch wirksame Therapie, belastbar beantwortet werden können.

Im vorliegenden Artikel werden ausgewählte Ergebnisse epidemiologischer Forschung am DRFZ dargestellt. Das übergreifende Ziel der Forschung war und ist es, zur Verbesserung der Lebensqualität rheumakranker Kinder und Erwachsener beizutragen. Dem dient die klinisch-evaluative Versorgungsforschung ebenso wie die Gewinnung von Erkenntnissen, die eine wirksame, individualisierte Therapie unterstützen. Als unverzichtbare Instrumente haben sich große, langfristige Patientenkohorten und ein stabiles Netzwerk mit den klinisch tätigen Rheumatologen und Betroffenen erwiesen.

[Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthritis with biologics]

Biologics are an integral part of modern strategies for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthritis (SpA), including psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Biologics are biotechnologically produced proteins that have inhibiting effects on humoral and cellular components of rheumatic inflammation. Substance classes used in rheumatology are tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1, IL‑6, IL-12, IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors effective against cytokines as well as the T lymphocyte activation inhibitor abatacept and the B lymphocyte-depleting rituximab. There are clear recommendations for the use of biologics for RA patients inadequately responding to one or more conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and nonradiographical axial SpA patients with an inadequate response to at least two nonsteroidal antirheumatic drugs. For PsA the recommended use depends on the most prominent manifestations in each case. Treatment with biologics should follow the treat to target principle, with a defined and validated treatment target. Treatment in cases of RA and SpA should target remission or at least a low or minimum disease activity. The safety of treatment with biologics has been intensively investigated. There are very specific contraindications for individual substance classes with a focus on an increased risk of infections. The standard procedure before starting treatment with biologics includes the exclusion of latent tuberculosis and hepatitis B. The TNF-alpha inhibitors have a protective effect with respect to myocardial infarction, stroke and venous thromboembolism.

Mobile Responsive App-A Useful Additional Tool for Data Collection in the German Pregnancy Register Rhekiss?

Background: The German pregnancy register Rhekiss is designed as a nationwide, web-based longitudinal observational cohort established in 2015. The register follows women with inflammatory rheumatic disease prospectively from child wish or early pregnancy until 2 years post-partum. Information on clinical and laboratory parameters, drug treatment, and (adverse) pregnancy outcomes are documented in pre-specified intervals. Physicians and patients report data for the same time periods via separated accounts and forms into a web-based application (app). As data entry on mobile devices might improve response rates of patients, a responsive app as a further convenient documentation option was developed.

Methods: The Rhekiss-app is available for self-reported data retrieval since August 2017 from the App stores. For the current analysis, Rhekiss register data were used from the start of the register until 30 September 2020. The analyses were performed for forms containing information on devices. Outcome parameters were compared for mobile and desktop users for the quantity and quality of filled forms.

Results: In total, 5,048 forms were received and submitted by 966 patients. About 57% of forms were sent from mobile devices with the highest numbers in patients with child wishes (63%). Users of mobile devices were slightly younger and often had less high-education level (62 vs. 79%) compared with desktop users. The proportion of forms submitted via mobile devices increased steadily from 48% in the fourth quarter of 2018 to 64% in the third quarter of 2020. The proportion of forms received before and after the Rhekiss-app implementation increased with the highest increase of 12% for forms filled at time point 12 months post-partum. Mobile users submitted significantly more forms than desktop users (2.9 vs. 2.1), data sent via desktops were more often complete (88 vs. 86%).

Conclusion: The responsive app is a valuable additional tool for data collection and is well-accepted by patients as indicated by its increasing use in Rhekiss. Apart from desktop/browser developments, the technological adoptions within observational cohorts and registries should take smartphone requirements and developments into account, especially when patient-reported data in young, mobile patients are collected, bearing in mind that data quality could be compromised and concepts for improving data quality should be implemented.

Comorbidity and healthcare utilisation in persons with incident systemic lupus erythematosus followed for 3 years after diagnosis: analysis of a claims data cohort

Objective

To analyse comorbidity and healthcare utilisation in individuals with SLE.

Methods

A cohort of individuals with incident SLE diagnosis in 2016 were investigated using claims data from a German statutory health insurance fund. Concomitant diagnoses, medical prescriptions, hospitalisation and sick leave were analysed in the year prior to diagnosis and during a 3-year follow-up in comparison with age-matched and sex-matched controls (1) without autoimmune diseases and (2) with incident diabetes mellitus. Sensitivity analyses were performed excluding cases with additional autoimmune diagnoses and without prescription of antimalarials.

Results

Among 571 individuals with SLE, hypertension (48%), depression (30%), hyperlipidaemia (25%), osteoarthritis (25%) and osteoporosis (20%) were the most frequent comorbidities in 2016. Cerebrovascular disease was documented in 9.6%. The number of drugs (mean 9.6, ∆+6.2), hospitalisation (40%, ∆+27%) and days on sick leave (median 46 days, ∆+27 days) increased significantly in the first year with SLE diagnosis. Individuals with SLE were more frequently hospitalised and had more medications compared with both control groups (all p<0.001). The increase in comorbidity diagnoses was low in controls without autoimmune diseases, while controls with diabetes showed a more pronounced increase in cardiovascular risk factors, but less in osteoporosis and cerebrovascular disease. Sensitivity analyses showed comparable results.

Conclusion

Comorbidities are frequently detected at the time of diagnosis of SLE. High numbers of drug prescriptions and hospitalisation following SLE diagnosis reflect the comprehensive disease burden. The comparison with incident diabetes shows that differences with controls without autoimmune disease are overestimated by detection bias.

Prescription of analgesics in patients with rheumatic diseases in Germany : A claims data analysis

Objective

To investigate the prescription frequency of analgesics in persons diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondylarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2019 using claims data.

Methods

Persons ≥ 18 years insured in 2019 with a diagnosis of RA (M05, M06), axSpA (M45), PsA (M07.0-3) or SLE (M32.1,8,9) were included. Analgesics were identified by the anatomic therapeutic classification (ATC) system. Reported is the percentage of individuals with ≥ 1 analgesics prescription for the respective rheumatic diagnosis in 2019 and for opioids age-standardized in each of the years 2005–2019. In addition, the proportion of long-term opioid use (prescriptions in ≥ 3 consecutive quarter years) in 2006 and 2019 is compared.

Results

Metamizole (29–33%) was the most commonly prescribed analgesic. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/coxibs were prescribed from 35% (SLE) to 50% (axSpA). Of the patients 11–13% were prescribed weak and 6–8% strong opioids. From 2005 to 2019, the proportion of persons with an opioid prescription remained stable, with similar or slightly decreasing proportions of weak opioids and more frequent prescriptions of strong opioids. The proportion of long-term opioid prescriptions increased from 2006 to 2019 from 8.9% to 11.0% (RA), from 6.9% to 9.1% (axSPA), from 7.8% to 9.5% (PsA), and from 7.5% to 8.8% (SLE), corresponding to a 17–24% increase.

Conclusion

The prescription of opioids for persons with inflammatory rheumatic diagnoses is not as high in Germany as in other countries; however, the proportion of long-term prescriptions has considerably increased. The frequent prescription of metamizole is conspicuous.

[Prescription of analgesics in patients with rheumatic diseases in Germany : A claims data analysis. German version]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prescription frequency of analgesics in persons diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondylarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2019 using claims data.

METHODS

Persons ≥ 18 years insured in 2019 with a diagnosis of RA (M05, M06), axSpA (M45), PsA (M07.0-3) or SLE (M32.1,8,9) were included. Analgesics were identified by the anatomic therapeutic classification (ATC) system. Reported is the percentage of individuals with ≥ 1 analgesics prescription for the respective rheumatic diagnosis in 2019 and for opioids age-standardized in each of the years 2005-2019. In addition, the proportion of long-term opioid use (prescriptions in ≥ 3 consecutive quarter years) in 2006 and 2019 is compared.

RESULTS

Metamizole (29-33%) was the most commonly prescribed analgesic. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/coxibs were prescribed from 35% (SLE) to 50% (axSpA). Of the patients 11-13% were prescribed weak and 6-8% strong opioids. From 2005 to 2019, the proportion of persons with an opioid prescription remained stable, with similar or slightly decreasing proportions of weak opioids and more frequent prescriptions of strong opioids. The proportion of long-term opioid prescriptions increased from 2006 to 2019 from 8.9% to 11.0% (RA), from 6.9% to 9.1% (axSPA), from 7.8% to 9.5% (PsA), and from 7.5% to 8.8% (SLE), corresponding to a 17-24% increase.

CONCLUSION

The prescription of opioids for persons with inflammatory rheumatic diagnoses is not as high in Germany as in other countries; however, the proportion of long-term prescriptions has considerably increased. The frequent prescription of metamizole is conspicuous.

[Translational healthcare research : Show what is-Angela Zink, the grande dame of public health research in rheumatology]

BACKGROUND

As director of the program area epidemiology and health care research at the German Rheumatism Research Center, Angela Zink established the German National Database, a national register for the care of people with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and other important registers for public health research in rheumatology.

OBJECTIVE

This publication summarizes Angela Zink's life work and sheds light on the national significance of this extraordinary achievement from the background of the research results achieved.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The available literature and personal memories of the author formed the basis of this summary.

RESULTS

The German National Database, which regularly collects data from more than 15,000 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases per year, shows that the prognosis has steadily improved in many areas, disease activity has decreased, the burden of illness due to pain or functional limitations has decreased, the incidence of incapacity for work and early retirement has decreased and those affected can nowadays participate to a much greater extent in social and working life; however, the data also revealed existing shortcomings, regional differences and differences between treatment by specialists or general practitioners. This made the database a central instrument of quality assurance. The biologics register RABBIT, in which side effects of biologics were registered and used for risk management, has also gained great importance.

CONCLUSION

The registers which were set up and systematically developed in the program area epidemiology under the leadership of Angela Zink, are a treasure trove of national importance. A continuation, even after the retirement of Angela Zink from active professional life, seems urgently necessary if the healthcare research of German rheumatology does not want to lose the international connection.

Acute anejaculation, hypogonadism, and fertility preservation in the setting of neurosarcoidosis: case report and literature review

Objective

To examine fertility preservation techniques in the setting of neurosarcoidosis, and to review the impact of corticosteroid and methotrexate therapy on fertility.

Design

Case report of a patient with infertility secondary to anejaculation associated with spinal neurosarcoidosis, treated with systemic corticosteroids and methotrexate.

Setting

Academic tertiary-care hospital.

Patient(s)

A 39-year-old man presented with neurosarcoidosis complicated by acute anejaculation, erectile dysfunction, and hypogonadism. He underwent fertility consultation and sperm cryopreservation before initiating methotrexate therapy. His pretreatment total testosterone was low, at 157 ng/dL.

Intervention(s)

Unsuccessful pharmacologic therapy and penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) were followed by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE). Clomiphene was administered for optimization of spermatogenesis before microTESE.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Vials of cryopreserved sperm, testis histopathology, and serum testosterone levels.

Result(s)

Eight vials of viable sperm were harvested by means of micro-TESE and cryopreserved. Despite intraoperative appearance of hypospermatogenesis, 90% of seminiferous tubules had active germ cell sloughing. Total testosterone increased to 278 ng/dL 2 months after initiating clomiphene.

Conclusion(s)

Conventional fertility preservation techniques may be effective in the setting of neurosarcoidosis-induced infertility owing to largely intact spermatogenesis. PVS, though not effective for this patient, should be considered along with electroejaculation, given high success rates in other patients with neurogenic anejaculation. Corticosteroid-mediated hypogonadism also must be considered in these patients, because it can negatively affect downstream spermatogenesis. In addition, evidence for the impact of paternal methotrexate exposure on fertility is limited and requires further investigation. As such, fertility consultation before initiating methotrexate is highly recommended.

Trends in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: cross-sectional data from the German National Database

Objective

To describe trends in outcomes among patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) over two decades.

Methods

From 1997 to 2017, a total of 1079 IIM patients were documented in the National Database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centers. Annual cross-sectional data on treatment, disease activity, patient-reported outcomes, hospitalization and employment were compared across the years. Information on phenotypes, organ manifestations and autoantibodies was collected for a subset to compare the assessment of global health, pain, fatigue and sleeping disorders.

Results

In 2017, significantly more IIM patients were assessed to be in low disease activity (94%) than in 1997 (59%), p < 0.01. Pain (p = 0.001), global health (p = 0.049), fatigue (p = 0.03) and sleeping disorders (p = 0.01) also improved since recording. Glucocorticoid use decreased from 84 to 58% (p < 0.01). Employment in patients < 65 years remained unchanged (53%), while early retirement (23–9%), hospitalization/year (34–18%) and sick leave (52–24%) decreased. A total of 186 patients with information on subtypes were classified as polymyositis (44%), dermatomyositis (33%), anti-synthetase syndrome (10%), overlapping-myositis (8%), inclusion body myositis (2%), necrotizing myositis (0.5%) and unspecific (3%). The most frequently reported symptoms were limitations in global health (60%), fatigue (57%) and sleeping disorders (51%), and all of them were most frequent in overlap-myositis. Pulmonary hypertension and cardiomyopathy were associated with poor outcomes regarding global health, daily activities and fatigue.

Conclusion

IIM patients report better outcomes than 20 years ago, along with good physician-reported disease control. Global health, fatigue and sleeping disorders are relevant patient-reported domains in IIM.