[Biologicals and small molecules for rheumatoid arthritis]

Effects of serial radon spa therapy on pain and peripheral immune status in patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders- results from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

In this randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial we aimed to investigate if radon spa therapy exerts more pain relief than exposure to warm water alone. In addition, immunological parameters were assessed in both treatment groups. In the RAD-ON02 trial, 116 patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) received either serial radon spa or solely warm water baths. Pain intensity was assessed by determination of different pain parameters on a visual analogue scale and by pressure point dolorimetry at baseline and at weeks 4, 12 and 24. The longitudinal immune status of the patients was analyzed by a flow cytometry-based assay from peripheral blood at the time points of pain assessments. There were no side effects attributable to radon exposure observed. However, radon spa was superior to warm water applications at week 4 in terms of pain reduction. Pain and morning stiffness at the time of assessment were significantly reduced after radon spa (p<0.001, p<0.01) but not after warm water baths. The dolorimetry resulted in a significantly higher exerted pressure strength in patients after radon spa (p<0.001), but not after warm water applications. During the long-term follow-up, both treatment modalities reduced pain to a similar degree and pain modulation was not distorted by the participants' intake of analgesics. No significant changes in the immune status attributable specifically to radon were found, even though the increase in regulatory T cell counts occurs earlier after radon baths than after sole warm water baths and a higher level of significance is reached after radon spa at week 24. Serial radon spa has additive pain-relieving effects. The immunological parameters assessed in our study appear not to be directly linked to the pain reduction caused by radon exposure, at least in MSD patients with predominantly degenerative diseases.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=rad-on02, identifier 2016-002085-31; https://drks.de/search/de/trial, identifier DRKS00016019.

[Drug therapy of rheumatoid arthritis: where do biologics and novel synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs stand today?]

Biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors play an important role in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. As new therapeutic developments have emerged in recent decades, the morbidity and mortality of rheumatoid arthritis have been significantly reduced. The characterization of the structure and function of immune cell receptors has led to the development of biologics that specifically inhibit cytokines and immune cell receptors. An important therapeutic addition was the approval of JAK inhibitors, which act directly on intracellular signaling by tyrosine kinases. This article provides an overview of the current therapeutic options for rheumatoid arthritis with a special focus on indication, mechanism of action and the place in the treatment algorithm of biologics and JAK inhibitors.

6-Shogaol inhibits the proliferation, apoptosis, and migration of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes via the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway

BACKGROUND

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) are essential for joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). 6-Shogaol, a phenolic extract isolated from ginger, has been found to have potential benefits in the treatment of diverse inflammatory and immune disorders. However, the role of 6-shogaol in RA has yet to be explored.

PURPOSE

To reveal the effect of 6-shogaol on RA FLSs and MH7A cells and to investigate the molecular mechanism of 6-shogao in RA.

METHODS

We performed MTT, EdU, cell apoptosis, cell migration and invasion, RT-qPCR, western blot analysis, and immunofluorescence to elucidate the effect of 6-shogaol on the proliferation, apoptosis, and migration of RA FLSs and MH7A cells and revealed its modulation of the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway. The in vivo therapeutic effect of 6-shogaol was verified in mice with collagen-induced arthritis (CIA).

RESULTS

6-Shogaol suppressed proliferation, migration, and invasion, and induced apoptosis in RA FLSs and MH7A cells. 6-Shogaol also reduced the production of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, MMP-2, and MMP-9. Molecular analysis revealed that 6-shogaol inhibited the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway by activating PPAR-γ. Treatment with 6-shogaol ameliorated joint destruction of mice with CIA.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that 6-shogaol inhibited proliferation, migration, invasion, cytokine, and MMPs production, and induced apoptosis in RA FLSs via the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway, providing a new natural potential drug for future RA treatments.

Organ Manifestation and Systematic Organ Screening at the Onset of Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) are often associated with the involvement of various organs. However, data regarding organ manifestation and organ spread are rare. To close this knowledge gap, this cross-sectional study was initiated to evaluate the extent of solid organ manifestations in newly diagnosed IRD patients, and to present a structured systematic organ screening algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 84 patients (63 women, 21 men) with newly diagnosed IRD. None of the patients received any rheumatic therapy. All patients underwent a standardised organ screening programme encompassing a basic screening (including lungs, heart, kidneys, and gastrointestinal tract) and an additional systematic screening (nose and throat, central and peripheral nervous system) on the basis of clinical, laboratory, and immunological findings.

RESULTS

Represented were patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD) (72.6%), small-vessel vasculitis (16.7%), and myositis (10.7%). In total, 39 participants (46.5%) had one or more organ manifestation(s) (one organ, 29.7%; two organs, 10.7%; ≥three organs, 6.0%). The most frequently involved organs were the lungs (34.5%), heart (11.9%), and kidneys (8.3%). Lastly, a diagnostic algorithm for organ manifestation was applied.

CONCLUSION

One-half of the patients presented with a solid organ involvement at initial diagnosis of IRD. Thus, in contrast to what has been described in the literature, organ manifestations were already present in a high proportion of patients at the time of diagnosis of IRD rather than after several years of disease. Therefore, in IRD patients, systematic organ screening is essential for treatment decisions.

Gene polymorphisms of SIRT1 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

AIM

Previous studies have shown that silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) expression is elevated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, whether gene polymorphisms in SIRT1 gene associated with RA in a Chinese Han population remains to be discussed.

METHOD

In this case-control study, 529 RA patients and 700 healthy controls were selected, and association of 11 SIRT1 gene polymorphisms (rs12415800, rs3740051, rs932658, rs3740053, rs7895833, rs10509291, rs33957861, rs7069102, rs2273773, rs3818292, rs1467568) with RA susceptibility was evaluated.

RESULTS

Frequency of GA+GG genotype of rs3740051 in RA patients was significantly lower than that in healthy controls (P = .037). Frequencies of GC and GC+GG genotypes of rs7069102 were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (P = .036, P = .047). Frequencies of GA and GA+GG genotypes of rs1467568 were lower in RA patients as compared to those in healthy controls (P = .011, P = .013). For rs2273773, RA patients who carried the T allele had higher number of tender joints than patients who carried the C allele (P = .033). Other polymorphisms did not associate with RA risk.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that rs3740051, rs7069102 and rs1467568 variants in SIRT1 gene are related to RA susceptibility in a Chinese Han population.

Going Further: Comprehensive Disease Control of Rheumatoid Arthritis, Targeting Cytokines and Chemokines

OBJECTIVES

Mechanism of action of biological and synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) includes the inhibition of specific proinflammatory cytokines. This study aimed to elucidate the cytokines and chemokines inhibited by different treatments (conventional synthetic DMARD [csDMARD], biological and targeted synthetic DMARD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Fifty-nine RA patients with low disease activity or remission included in a cross-sectional study were classified by treatment in groups: abatacept, certolizumab, rituximab (RTX), tocilizumab, tofacitinib (TOF), baricitinib (BAR), and csDMARD. Cytokine and chemokine serum levels were measured by LEGENDplex Human Inflammation panel. Quantitative variables were compared using Student t or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate, whereas qualitative variables were compared using χ2 or Fisher exact test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Certolizumab, RTX, tocilizumab, and TOF showed that most cytokine pathways inhibited: tumor necrosis factor α, interferon γ, interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-12, IL-18, and IL-23; in addition, csDMARDs showed a similar inhibition patron except for IL-23. Serum level of tumor necrosis factor α pathway was one of the most inhibited being undetectable in RTX, TOF, and BAR groups. Interleukin 6 was shown to be inhibited by abatacept, RTX, and TOF; however, higher levels were observed in 3 patients treated with tocilizumab. Abatacept, certolizumab, RTX, and TOF downregulated IL-10 in this group of patients but remained detectable in almost half of the subjects, with the highest levels in the BAR group. The active pathways that remained the most were CC chemokine ligand 2, IL-8, IL-17, and IL-33.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the cytokine chemokine pathways inhibition could help rheumatologists to prescribe a tailored therapy using the arsenal of DMARDs for individualized RA treatment in an evidence-based decision manner.