Technical difficulties of removal of locking screw after locking compression plating

Submuscular Plating Versus Elastic Intramedullary Nailing in Children with Femoral Shaft Fracture; a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is currently the technique of choice for pediatric femoral fractures. Submuscular plating (SMP) allows reliable healing associated with an early range of motion. The following systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to reveal the functional and surgical outcomes of SMP and ESIN for fixation of pediatric femoral fractures and to aid in the decision-making processes for those who perform these procedures.

Methods

An extensive systematic literature review was implemented from inception to 23 February 2022. All clinical studies included had patients that were younger than 18 years old with femoral shaft fractures that compared outcomes between SMP and ESIN. Studies including patients with pathological fractures, closed femoral physis, multiple fractures, or refractures were excluded.

Results

This meta-analysis included six articles encompassing 568 patients. Of them, 206 patients were treated with SMP, while 362 were subjected to ESIN procedure. There was significantly more blood loss among patients treated with SMP (MD -45.45; 95% -61.62, -29.27; p < 0.001). The risk of postoperative adverse surgical events was significantly higher among patients subjected to the ESIN (RR 2.97 19.5; 95% 1.27, 6.98; p = 0.01). The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter among patients subjected to ESIN (SMD -1.47; 95% -2.43, -0.51; p = 0.003). Patients subjected to SMP showed significantly more EFOs when comparing Flynn Scores (OR 0.24; 95% 0.09, 0.64; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between SMP and ESIN regarding the mean operation time, limb length discrepancy, and mean time to union.

Conclusions

Children with femoral shaft fractures can be managed effectively and safely with SMP. There was a similar surgical outcome between SMP and ESIN, but SMP had more EFOs. While SMP was associated with a low risk of postoperative adverse surgical events, it was associated with a more significant blood loss and prolonged hospital stays.

Evaluation of a novel semicircular locking external fixator for treating fractures of long bones: Biomechanical comparison with a circular external fixator

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical properties of a novel semicircular locking external fixator with locking screw mechanism, shape of trapezoidal corrugations, half- ring designed for greater stability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The novel external fixator had a half-ring with the shape of trapezoidal corrugations and locking screws fixing the bone at different angles in all three planes (sagittal, axial, and coronal). The biomechanical properties of the semicircular locking external fixator (group 1) were compared with those of a standard Ilizarov-type circular external fixator (group 2) (TST, İstanbul, Turkey) in an experimental study design. Five frames were used in each group. Standard PE 1000 (polyethylene) rod models (n = 10) simulating the tibia bone model were used. Both systems were compared biomechanically by applying axial and torsional loads simultaneously.

RESULT

Two samples in group 2 were damaged before the test ended during axial loading. All of the samples in group 1 completed the tests without damage after 150,000 cycles. The axial stiffness of the semicircular locking external fixator was found to be significantly higher than that of the Ilizarov-type circular external fixator (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the two fixators in torsional loading. The application time of semicircular locking external fixator was significantly shorter than Ilizarov-type circular external fixator (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The novel semicircular locking external fixator was biomechanically stronger than the Ilizarov-type external fixator for treating fractures of long bones. It can be used as a permanent external fixator for the definitive treatment of long bone fractures with soft tissue damage in terms of stability and application time.

Tronco-conical locking plate in distal radius fractures

INTRODUCTION

Volar locked plates represent the most popular fixation technique for distal radius fracture (DRF). However, threaded screw-hole angular stability mechanism has some issues. The purpose of our study is to evaluate clinical and radiological outcome of a tronco-conical locking mechanism for volar plating of DRF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty patients with DRF treated with tronco-conical locking volar plates between May 2013 to December 2017 in two institutions were collected. We analysed clinical and radiological outcomes and peri-operative complications, like loss of reduction, fragment displacement, deformation or implant-related problems and surgical and other general complications.

RESULTS

78 patients were available for at final follow-up. The average follow-up period was 11.4 months (range, 6-18 months). All fractures healed within three months. Five cases of final reductions were defined unsatisfying. According to Gartland and Werley's scoring system at final follow up, 36 patients had excellent results, 40 patients had good results, one patient had fair and one patient had poor results. Five complications were observed. No complications were observed during surgical plate removal.

CONCLUSION

Complications found in our study are not related to tronco-conical locking mechanism and are like those found in the literature. Further studies are needed to evaluate functional results or radiographic parameters of this new type of angular stability mechanism. Tronco-conical locking plate is an attractive alternative threaded screw-hole angular stability mechanism.

Screw stripping and its prevention in the hexagonal socket of 3.5-mm titanium locking screws

There have been several reports about the difficulties in removing 3.5-mm titanium locking screws from plates due to the stripping or rounding of the hexagonal screw socket. We investigated whether stripping the locking screw sockets can be prevented by using different screwdrivers or interposing materials into the socket during removal. We overtightened 120 3.5-mm titanium locking screws (Depuy Synthes, Paoli, PA) equally into locking plates on sawbone tibia models, applying a uniform torque of 4.5 Nm, exceeding the recommended torque of 1.5 Nm. Twenty screws each were removed using a straight-handle 2.5-mm screwdriver, T-handle screwdriver, hex key wrench, and straight-handle screwdriver with a non-dominant hand. In addition, 20 screws were removed using foil from a suture packet inserted into the screw socket or using parts of a latex glove inserted into the screw socket. The incidence rates of screw stripping using the straight-handle screwdriver, T-handle screwdriver, hex key wrench, non-dominant hand, foil interposition, and latex glove interposition were 75%, 40%, 35%, 90%, 60%, and 70%, respectively. When a T-handle screwdriver or hex key wrench was used, the probability of screw stripping was 4.50 times (odds ratio = 4.50, 95% confidence interval = 1.17 to 17.37, p = 0.03) and 5.57 times (odds ratio = 5.57, 95% confidence interval = 1.42 to 21.56, p = 0.01) lower than that with the straight-handle screwdriver, respectively. Foil or latex glove interpositions did not prevent screw stripping. Thus, in the current experimental study, T-handle screwdriver or hex key wrench usage decreased the incidence rate of screw stripping during removal compared to straight-handle screwdriver use.

Volar locking plate removal after distal radius fracture: a 10-year retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common upper extremity fracture. After the introduction of volar locking plate (VLP) fixation, treatment has shifted from conservative management to more operative management. The implant removal rate after VLP fixation in patients with DRF varies and the reasons for removal and associated patient characteristics have not been clearly defined. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of patients who underwent VLP with and without subsequent implant removal. Second, the rate of implant removal according to the implant position and type was investigated. Finally, we summarized clinical outcome with implant removal, the reasons for, and complications associated with implant removal.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patient data were collected between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. The study population was divided into two groups based on subsequent implant removal. Data on patient characteristics, such as age, sex, comorbidities, side of the fractured arm, the AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification of the DRF, plate position grade based on the Soong classification type, type of inserted plate, insurance coverage, and treatment costs were collected. Furthermore, we investigated the reason for implant removal, clinical outcomes, and post-removal complications.

RESULTS

After applying the exclusion criteria, 806 patients with a total of 814 DRFs were included in the study. Among the 806 patients who underwent VLP fixation for DRF, 252 (31.3%) patients underwent implant removal. Among the patients undergoing implant removal, the mean age was 50.8 ± 14.0 years, 94 (37.3%) were male. The average time to implant removal from the fracture fixation was 12.1 ± 9.2 months (range 1-170 months). When comparing groups, patients who underwent implant removal were significantly younger and had fewer cases of diabetes, hypertension, and cancer history. According to the Soong plate position grade, the most common position was G1 in both groups. Although there was no significant difference (p = 0.075), more G2 cases were found in the removal group (15.0%) than in the retention group (10.2%). About 66.5% of the patients with implant removal had other health insurance as well as the national service, compared with 47% of the patients with implant retention. In total, 186 patients (73.8%) underwent implant removal despite being asymptomatic after the bony union. The patient satisfaction scores improved from 4.1 to 4.4 after implant removal, and 93% of the patients answered that they would choose implant removal again. Only 10% of the patients who underwent removal reported minor complications. No major complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Although the implant removal was conducted without clinical symptoms in the majority of patients, overall patients presented improved functional outcomes with implant removal. The evidence is inconclusive regarding its necessity, however, implant removal after VLP fixation for DRF is not a challenging procedure and is not associated with major complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Operative Choice for Length-Unstable Femoral Shaft Fracture in School-Aged Children: Locking Plate vs. Monolateral External Fixator

BACKGROUND

Locking plate (LP) is a good choice in the treatment of length-unstable femoral shaft fracture in children. Monolateral external fixator (EF) has been reported for this condition for decades. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of school-aged children with length-unstable femoral shaft fracture treated with LP vs. EF.

METHODS

Patients aged 5-11 years old with length-unstable femoral shaft fractures treated at our institute from January 2014 to January 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and categorized into LP and EF groups. The preoperative data, including baseline information of the patients, radiographic parameters, and types of surgical procedure, were collected from the hospital database, and postoperative data, including complications, were collected during the follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Overall, 36 patients (average, 8.2 ± 2.1 years; male, 20; female, 16) in the LP group and 35 patients (average, 8.3 ± 2.3 years; male 20, female 15) in the EF group were included. There was significantly less operative time for EF (45.4 ± 7.8 min) compared with LP (67.8 ± 11.3 min) (P < 0.001). As for the frequency of fluoroscopy, there was a significant difference between the EF (13.9 ± 2.4) and LP (16.5 ± 3.2) groups (p < 0.001). The rate of major complications was not significantly different between these two groups. There was a significant difference between the EF group (11.2 ± 5.8 mm) and the LP group (7.5 ± 1.6 mm) group concerning limb length discrepancy (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both LP and EF produce satisfactory outcomes in school-aged children with length unstable femoral shaft fractures. External fixation remains a viable choice without the necessity of secondary surgery for hardware removal.

Conical coupling angular stable plate fixation: a retrospective study

Backgrounds.

Conical coupling represents an alternative to screw coupling on angular stable plate fixation. Aims of the present study was to evaluate clinical effectiveness and ease of plate removal of conical coupling locking plates into different scenario regarding quality of bone, type of fracture and operative technique.

Methods.

From May 2013 to December 2017, 198 patients with 206 fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation with conical locking plate. In most cases fixation involved wrist (38%) and clavicle (24%) fractures but a varied type of fractures and bone were included in the study.

Results.

Ten complications related to plate fixation were observed (5,1%). Two case of intra-articular positioning of screws of wrist plate. One case of loss of reduction and breakage of wrist plate due to an inappropriate proximal fracture fixation. Five cases of complications involved clavicle fixation: three cases of non-union, one case of peri-implant fracture, one screw loosening. One non-union of distal tibial fracture, one non-union in olecranon fracture were finally observed. Thirty-four patients that have symptoms that could be traceable to the implants in-situ underwent plate removal. No complications were observed during surgical plates removal. Conical coupling angular stability plate represents an actractive alternative to threaded angular stability plate. Bush titanium insert, eliminating the problems of cold welding and cross-threading, simplifies surgical screws and plate removal

"Turn the tail, not the head": a simple, quick and inexpensive technique for the safe removal of jammed/stripped locking screws

A jammed screw is a well-known complication of locking plates. Noncompliance to the standard techniques, nonusage of torque limiting screwdrivers and manufacturer-specific instrumentations are the common causes of jammed locking screw heads. Previously, various techniques have been described for the retrieval of jammed locking screws by damaging the screw head, using conical reverse threaded drill bits and often cutting off the plates at jammed screw sites that often generate metal debris and cause bone and soft tissue damage of unknown extent. We present a simple technique and a novel device that does not damage the screw head or the plate, and therefore, no metal debris is generated. The threads on the terminal part of the screw are used to disengage the jammed locking screw head from its locking hole.

An inexpensive and rapid method for removal of multiple stripped locking screws following locking plating: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Removal of stripped or jammed locking screws involves several difficulties. Especially when two or more screws are involved, their removal is a more challenging and time-consuming process because the various reported techniques have certain limitations.

CASE PRESENTATION

Herein, we report a case in which five stripped screws were removed using a novel technique.

DISCUSSION

Many techniques to remove damaged locking head screw were introduced, however in case with multiple screws were involved, they are limited to use. In the case, screw extractor, although it is not a medical device, is helpful in terms of time and cost.

CONCLUSION

In case with the failure of removal of multiple locking screws, our technique using non-medical screw extractor can be a good option.

Pitfalls and limits of locking plates

The use of locking plates relies on novel mechanical and biological concepts: the bone healing is endochondral because of the elasticity of the constructs. Preoperative planning is required to determine the fracture reduction strategy and select the implants. The type of plate and the type of screws and their position determine the mechanical properties of the construct. Failure of locking plate fixation is a new phenomenon that differs from conventional plate fixation. These are brought on by inadequate planning, which is made worse when minimally invasive surgery is performed. Often, the fracture is not reduced correctly (leading to malunion), the implant length is incorrect, or the screw type, number, location and implantation sequence are inappropriate. Together these can result in an overly rigid construct with poor healing and implant failure or the opposite, an overly flexible construct that can compromise healing. The return to weight bearing after fracture fixation must be adapted to the type of fracture and construct. While locking plates provide better bone purchase, especially in osteoporotic bone, "en bloc" pulling out of the implant is possible. Delayed fractures at the end of the plates are also possible but can be avoided by making the correct biomechanical choices during fixation. For epiphyseal fractures, there are risks of cut-out and impaction of locking screws in cancellous bone related to the fracture pathology. In the long-term, locking plates can be difficult to remove; however, specialized instrumentation can make this easier.

Locking design affects the jamming of screws in locking plates

The seizing of locking screws is a frequently encountered clinical problem during implant removal of locking compression plates (LCP) after completion of fracture healing. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two different locking mechanisms on the seizing of locking screws. Specifically, the removal torques before and after cyclic dynamic loading were assessed for screws inserted at the manufacturer-recommended torque or at an increased insertion torque. The seizing of 3.5-mm angular stable screws was assessed as a function of insertion torque for two different locking mechanisms (Thread & Conus and Thread Only). Locking screws (n=10 for each configuration) were inserted either according to the manufacturer-recommended torque or at an increased torque of 150% to simulate an over-insertion of the screw. Half of the screws were removed directly after insertion and the remaining half was removed after a dynamic load protocol of 100,000 cycles. The removal torques of locking screws exceeded the insertion torques for all tested conditions confirming the adequacy of the test setup in mimicking screw seizing in locked plating. Screw seizing was more pronounced for Thread Only design (+37%) compared to Thread & Conus design (+14%; P<0.0001). Cyclic loading of the locking construct consistently resulted in an increased seizing of the locking screws (P<0.0001). Clinical observations from patients treated with the Thread & Conus locking design confirm the biomechanical findings of reduction in seizing effect by using a Thread & Conus design. In conclusion, both over-tightening and cyclic loading are potential causes for screw seizing in locking plate implants. Both effects were found to be less pronounced in the Thread & Conus design as compared to the traditional Thread Only design.

Benefits of hardware removal after plating

Routine implant removal is frequently performed although evidence-based guidelines are lacking. But routinely planned implant removal has significant economic implications and shows considerable complication rates. In general, clinical outcome seems to improve but pain relief after operation is often unpredictable. Even in patients reporting implant-related pain, implant removal does not guarantee relief and may be associated with further complications. The intra- and postoperative complication rate remains very high. Implant removal demonstrates a significant learning curve and unsupervised junior surgeons tend to cause more complications. The need for implant removal may be questioned. Even with the implant in place, contact activities can be resumed. However, a new adequate trauma can create a new fracture independently if there is an implant in-situ or not. It is important to understand the complications and outcomes to be expected with hardware removal to carefully evaluate its indication.

Titanium Elastic Nailing with Temporary External Fixator versus Bridge Plating in Comminuted Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

High-velocity trauma, associated injuries, risk of iatrogenic devascularization of fragments and need for maintaining alignment upto union make comminuted fracture in pediatric femur a formidable fracture to treat. This comparative study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of two modes of management in such cases: titanium elastic nailing supplemented with external fixator and submuscular bridge plating (BP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty eight children (aged 6-12 years) with comminuted fracture shaft femur who were randomized into two groups underwent systematic evaluation. One group was operated with titanium nailing with temporary external stabilization by fixators (titanium nailing with external [TNE] group) for 4 weeks. The other underwent submuscular BP with locked plates (BP group). Clinical and radiological outcomes, operative time, blood loss, radiation exposure, difficulties in removal and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both groups achieved union (10.7 ± 1.9 weeks BP, 11 ± 1.6 weeks TNE), satisfactory knee flexion (138.2 ± 6.4° BP, 136 ± 7.3° TNE), and painless weight bearing (7.3 ± 0.9 weeks vs. 7.3 ± 1.4 weeks) in acceptable alignment. Functional outcomes were excellent in majority of both BP (15 of 19) and nail external fixator groups (15 of 18). Operating time and radiation exposure (69.5 ± 14.5 s vs. 50.9 ± 12.9 s) were more in TNE than in BP (P < 0.01). However, implant removal was more difficult in BP (56.4 ± 12.4 min in BP vs. 30.1 ± 8.8 min TNE). Pin-tract infections (n = 3) and hardware prominence (n = 2) in TNE group and deep infections (n = 2) in BP group were notable complications.

CONCLUSION

Two groups were similar in radiological and functional outcomes. Inserting elastic nails and external fixator was a more exacting surgery, while removal was more difficult in BP group. Both techniques had acceptable success and complication rates.

Treatment of pes varus using locking plate fixation in seven Dachshund dogs

Objectives: To describe the surgical treatment of pes varus in Dachshund dogs by medial opening wedge osteotomy of the distal tibia stabilized with a locking plate system and to retrospectively report the clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Materials and methods: Lameness in nine limbs of seven Dachshund dogs with pes varus deformity was treated with corrective osteotomy at or near the centre of rotation of angulation as defined by the intersection of the proximal and distal mechanical axes determined on caudo-cranial radiographs. Outcomes evaluated included comparison of preand postoperative radiographic measurements of frontal angulation and lameness assessment.

Results: Lameness resolved in eight limbs and improved in one limb. All osteotomies healed and no implant complications were detected. Mean preoperative radiographic measurements were: mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) = 91.1° (range 87.6°-95°), mechanical medial distal tibial angle (mMDTA) = 62.1° (range 51.9°-69.6°). Mean postoperative measurements were: mMPTA 92.4° (range 78°-97.5°), mMDTA 81.8° (range 76°-87°). Measurable undercorrection was common, though seldom visually or functionally evident.

Clinical significance: Pes varus deformity in Dachshunds can be treated by medial opening wedge osteotomy of the distal tibia stabilized with a locking plate system. Care to preserve the lateral cortex of the osteotomy may help avoid under-correction.

A Passive and Wireless Sensor for Bone Plate Strain Monitoring

This paper reports on a sensor for monitoring bone plate strain in real time. The detected bone plate strain could be used for judging the healing state of fractures in patients. The sensor consists of a magnetoelastic material, which can be wirelessly connected and passively embedded. In order to verify the effectiveness of the sensor, a tibia-bone plate-screw (TBS) model was established using the finite element analysis method. A variation of the bone plate strain was obtained via this model. A goat hindquarter tibia was selected as the bone fracture model in the experiment. The tibia was fixed on a high precision load platform and an external force was applied. Bone plate strain variation during the bone fracture healing process was acquired with sensing coils. Simulation results indicated that bone plate strain decreases as the bone gradually heals, which is consistent with the finite element analysis results. This validated the soundness of the sensor reported here. This sensor has wireless connections, no in vivo battery requirement, and long-term embedding. These results can be used not only for clinical practices of bone fracture healing, but also for bone fracture treatment and rehabilitation equipment design.

New Technique for Removal of Screws With Damaged Heads

Removal of orthopedic implants may sometimes be difficult because of ongrowth of new bone. Titanium screws can become encased or stripped during the process of initial open reduction and internal fixation or at the time of hardware removal. Difficulty in removing screws from a locking plate is particularly well-known. Two patients with tibial and femoral diaphyseal fractures were treated using a locking plate or an intramedullary nail. However, after fracture healing, it was difficult to remove the locking screw or reconstruction screws because of damage to the heads. The stripped reconstruction screw was successfully removed employing the authors' so-called parallel planes technique. In this method, a high-speed diamond-tipped burr is applied to opposite sides of the screw head to form 2 parallel faces located slightly away from the recess of the screw head. The 2 faces can then be grasped solidly with locking pliers, allowing removal of the implant by unscrewing it with a gentle upward pulling action. The locking plate was cut from the plate edge to the edge of the screw hole. While making these radial cuts in the plates, the authors were careful not to extend the blade into the screw head. After removal of the locking plate from the screw, the authors were able to extract the jammed screw uneventfully using this technique. This technique can be performed without difficulty and does not require a special device. It is a useful option for extraction of damaged screws. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):e911-e914.].

Water-based lubricant as an adjunct to wound toilet: Validation of a technique by experiment

INTRODUCTION

Metal debris can produce a foreign body inflammatory reaction or as third body wear in the situation of joint arthroplasty. We evaluate a simple method for reducing this debris using a sterile water-based lubricating gel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight experimental surgical models consisting of porcine muscle overlying a polyethylene tube with a titanium locking plate and screws secured were constructed. Four models had water based lubricating gel applied to the wound edges, four were left without as controls. Image were then captured before and after irrigation from which the amount of debris could be quantified.

RESULTS

The reduction of surface area covered by debris for models with water-based gel was greater (p=0.001). The average reduction in surface area was 27.2% for the control group and 94.1% for the models covered with lubricating gel.

CONCLUSION

We show that using a safe, inexpensive and easily available water-based lubricating gel reduces the amount of embedded debris when burring metal implants using a high-speed burr.

Easy and Inexpensive Technique for Removal of Round Headed, Jammed Locking Screws in Distal Tibial Interlocking Plate

Introduction:

The advent of locking plates has brought new problems in implant removal. Difficulty in removing screws from a locking plate is well-known. These difficulties include cold welding between the screw head and locking screw hole, stripping of the recess of the screw head for the screwdriver, and cross-threading between threads in the screw head and screw hole. However, there are cases in which removal is difficult. We describe a new technique for removing a round headed, jammed locking screws from a locking plate.

Case Report:

55 years old male patient received a locking distal tibial plate along with distal fibular plate 3years back from UAE. Now patient came with complaint of non-healing ulcer over medial aspect of lower 1/3rd of right leg from past 1 year. Non operative management did not improve the symptoms. The patient consented to implant removal, with the express understanding that implant removal might be impossible because already one failed attempt had been performed at some other hospital six months back. We then decided to proceed with the new technique. The rest of the proximal screws were removed using a technique not previously described. We used stainless steel metal cutting blades that are used to cut door locks or pad locks to cut the remaining stripped headed screws.

Conclusion:

This technique is very quick, easy to perform and inexpensive because the metal cutting blades which are used to cut the screws are very cheap. Yet it is very effective technique to remove the stripped headed or jammed locking screws. It is also very less destructive because of very less heat production during the procedure there is no problem of thermal necrosis to the bone or the surrounding soft tissue.

Possible predictors for difficult removal of locking plates: A case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Difficult removal of locking plates including less invasive stabilisation systems (LISSs) and locking compression plates (LCPs) sometimes occur. However, investigations of the mechanisms and correlated factors of complicated removal remain scant. This study aims to identify correlated factors for the difficult removal of locking plates and to propose suggestions for decision making regarding implant removal and the prevention of complicated removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 308 consecutive patients who underwent LCP/LISS removal from Sep. 2004 to Nov. 2013 were assessed. Using the Mann-Whitney U test, we analysed the correlation between difficult removal and the duration between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and implant removal as well as the correlation between difficult removal and the patients' age. Using Chi Square test, we assessed the correlations between complicated removal and the size, location, insertion technique and cortical purchase of the locking head screw (LHS). Correlated factors were separately determined in upper and lower extremities. Rates of difficult removal in different fracture locations were evaluated, and postoperative complications were documented.

RESULTS

Of the total 308 patients, thirty-seven had intra-operative difficulties, and six patients experienced postoperative complications. Six out of fifteen patients with peri-elbow fractures and five out of seventeen patients with femur fractures suffered difficult removal, while four out of one hundred patients with malleolar fractures had intra-operative difficulties. Difficulties were experienced with 30 of 338 LCPs, 7 of 32 LISSs, 67 of 1533 small-diameter (≤ 3.5-mm) LHSs, and 12 of 442 large-diameter (≥ 4.5-mm) LHSs. Three LCPs and seventeen small-diameter LHSs were retained. A longer interval between ORIF and removal, younger age and bicortical screws correlated with difficult removal in the upper extremities, and a longer duration before removal, small-diameter LHS and minimally invasive insertion of LHS were predictors in the lower extremities.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications occur with LCP/LISS removal, and it should not be a routine procedure. If removal is indicated, performing surgery as soon as radiographs show fracture healing is recommended. Different considerations should apply when making decisions and removing implants from patients with different fracture sites.

Complication with removal of a lumbar spinal locking plate

Introduction. The use of locking plate technology for anterior lumbar spinal fusion has increased stability of the vertebral fusion mass over traditional nonconstrained screw and plate systems. This case report outlines a complication due to the use of this construct. Case. A patient with a history of L2 corpectomy and anterior spinal fusion presented with discitis at the L4/5 level and underwent an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) supplemented with a locking plate placed anterolaterally for stability. Fifteen months after the ALIF procedure, he returned with a hardware infection. He underwent debridement of the infection site and removal of hardware. Results. Once hardware was exposed, removal of the locking plate screws was only successful in one out of four screws using a reverse thread screw removal device. Three of the reverse thread screw removal devices broke in attempt to remove the subsequent screws. A metal cutting drill was then used to break hoop stresses associated with the locking device and the plate was removed. Conclusion. Anterior locking plates add significant stability to an anterior spinal fusion mass. However, removal of this hardware can be complicated by the inherent properties of the design with significant risk of major vascular injury.

Micromotion in the fracture healing of closed distal metaphyseal tibial fractures: A multicentre prospective study

The dynamic locking screw (DLS) in association with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in a bridging construct for simple metadiaphyseal long bone fractures enables modulation of the rigidity of the system and facilitates the development of early and triplanar bone callus. Twenty patients affected by distal tibial fracture were treated with MIPO bridging technique and DLS at the proximal side of the fracture. Time of consolidation, quality of the reduction, complications and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were monitored and the results compared with those from a control group treated with only standard screws on both fracture sides. Student t-test for independent samples was used for the comparison of means between the two groups. Chi-square test was used for the comparison of proportions. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed to assess the possible confounding effects. Performance was considered significant for p<0.05. The mean healing time was 17.6 ± 2.8 weeks in the group treated with standard screws and 13.5 ± 1.8 weeks in the group treated with DLS (t=5.5, p<0.0001). The DLS was associated with early healing and triplanar bone callus.

Surgical treatment of extra-articular or simple intra-articular distal tibial fractures: MIPO versus supercutaneous plating

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has become a widely accepted technique to treat distal tibial fractures. Recently, the novel application of a locking plate used as an external fixator (supercutaneous plating) was introduced for the management of open fractures and infected nonunions and even as an adjunct in distraction osteogenesis, which is considered another less invasive method. The aim of this study was to compare the results of supercutaneous plating with closed reduction and minimally invasive plating in the treatment of distal tibial fractures. Forty-eight matched patients were divided according to age, sex, Injury Severity Score, and fracture pattern into the MIPO group and the supercutaneous plating group. Minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean, 18.5 months; range, 12-26 months). No patient had nonunion, hardware breakdown, or deep infection. Patients in the supercutaneous plating group had a significantly shorter mean operative time (65.6±13.2 vs 85.9±14.0 minutes; P=.000), hospital stay (7.5±2.0 vs 13.0±4.4 days; P=.000), and union time (15.2±2.4 vs 17.0±2.8 weeks; P=.000). In the MIPO group, 15 (62.5%) patients reported implant impingement or discomfort and there was 1 incidence of stripping of 15.6% at the time of locking screw removal, whereas in the supercutaneous plating group, no patient reported skin irritation, and removal of the supercutaneous plate was easily performed in clinic without anesthesia. Distal tibial fractures may be treated successfully with MIPO or supercutaneous plating. However, the supercutaneous plating technique may represent a superior surgical option because it offers advantages in terms of mean operative time, hospital stay, and union time; skin irritation; and implant removal.

Hollow mill for extraction of stripped titanium screws: an easy, quick, and safe technique

Removal of jammed titanium screws can be difficult due to the problem of stripping of the hexagonal heads of the screws. We present a technique of extraction of stripped screws with the use of a standard 4.5 mm stainless steel hollow mill in a patient of peri-implant fracture of the radius fixed with a titanium locking plate 2 years back. The technique is quick, safe, and cost effective.

Difficulty in locking head screw removal

BACKGROUND

Locking plates are an internal fixation material useful in the treatment of bone fractures, which provides effective stabilization between the plate and locking head screws (LHSs) via the locking mechanism. However, difficulty in removing LHSs is relatively common, and such cases can require long surgical procedures or use of special removal equipment. The purpose of this study was to report the incidence and risk factors for difficult removal of LHSs.

METHODS

During the 5-year-6-month period from April 2006 to September 2011, 83 locking plates containing a total of 482 LHSs were removed in 80 patients at our institution. Out of 482 LHSs, there were 118 LHSs with a 2.4-2.7 mm diameter, 308 LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter and 56 LHSs with a 5.0 mm diameter. The incidence of removal difficulty was examined on the basis of screw diameter. In addition, the risk factors were assessed in only LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter. LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter were divided into 2 groups, the difficult removal group and the easy removal group, and the data were examined based on age, sex, time between insertion and removal, and screw position. The incidence of removal difficulty in LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter was examined every 6 months between insertion and removal.

RESULTS

Difficulty in removal was encountered in none (0 %) of 118 LHSs with a 2.4-2.7 mm diameter, 15 (4.9 %) of 308 LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter, and none (0 %) of 56 LHSs with a 5.0 mm diameter. In only LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter, the mean ages of the patients in the difficult removal group and the easy removal group were 32.1 and 45.6 years, respectively. The average time between insertion and removal in the difficult removal group and the easy removal group was 529.2 and 389.2 days, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in age and time between insertion and removal. Removal was difficult in 15 (9.1 %) of 165 LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter in those with >1 year between insertion and removal.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that (1) the use of LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter is a necessary condition for difficulty in screw removal, and that (2) longer time from internal fixation to removal, and (3) younger age, are risk factors for it. When removing LHSs with a 3.5 mm diameter, appropriate instruments and sufficient training are necessary.

Technical complications during removal of locking screws from locking compression plates: a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

To assess the risk for technical complications in patients undergoing removal of locking compression plates (LCP) with head locking screws.

METHODS

A total of 205 patients who were scheduled for implant removal surgery after a healed fracture of the femur, tibia, humerus, distal radius, or clavicle in nine Austrian clinics were prospectively included in the study, all of whom had previously undergone fracture fixation by plates, with titanium implants used in 98 % of the patients. Intraoperative technical complications and the methods used to solve them were documented by the surgeon.

RESULTS

During the course of this study, a total of 1,462 locking screws were removed from 204 LCPs. While 95 % of these screws could be removed without difficulties, technical complications were reported for 41 patients with 78 screws which could not be removed with standard screwdrivers and required the use of additional instruments. The estimated risk for the occurrence of at least one technical complication during implant removal surgery was 20.1 %. The most frequently observed complications were screws that could not be loosened because they were jammed in the LCP, screws with a damaged recess in which the screwdriver turned freely, as well as a combination of both events. The majority of these screws could be removed with the use of a conical extraction screw or by drilling off the screw head. In one patient, an intraoperative refracture of the humerus occurred during plate removal. Even though there is a rate of 20 % for technical complications when removing the implants, only a few patients experience a clinical impact.

CONCLUSIONS

Titanium LCPs are prone to technical complications during implant removal, but the majority of the issues can be solved using special techniques.

Locking Compression Plates are more difficult to remove than conventional non-locking plates

PURPOSE

Locking Compression Plates (LCPs) have been introduced in the last decade. Clinicians have the impression that hardware removal of LCPs are more difficult and associated with more complications than conventional (non-locking) plates. Therefore, this study compares the complication rates of Locking Compression Plate (LCP) removal and conventional non-locking plate removal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation and subsequent hardware removal at the Department of Trauma Surgery at our Level 1 Trauma Centre between 1993 and 2007 were included through the hospital's information system. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of complications during implant removal.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients were included. The females were significantly older than the males [median age, 51.5 vs. 42.6 years (p < 0.001)]. The median operation time of LCP removal was significantly longer than the operation time of non-locking plate removal (72 vs. 54 min, p < 0.001). In the total study population, complications during implant removal occurred in 25 patients (11.9%). The complication rate of conventional non-locking plate removal was 2.5%. The complication rate of LCP removal was significantly higher (17.7%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LCP removal is associated with significantly more complications than conventional non-locking plate removal. The indication for removal of locking compression should be made cautiously, and surgical instruments for LCP removal should be optimized.

Clinical outcome of implant removal after fracture healing. Design of a prospective multicentre clinical cohort study

Background

The clinical results of removal of metal implants after fracture healing are unknown and the question whether to remove or to leave them in is part of discussion worldwide. We present the design of a prospective clinical multicentre cohort study to determine the main indications for and expectations of implant removal, the influence on complaints, the incidence of surgery related complications and the socio-economic consequences of implant removal.

Methods/Design

In a prospective multicentre clinical cohort study at least 200 patients with a healed fracture after osteosynthesis with a metal implant are included for analyzing the outcome after removal. Six hospitals in the Netherlands are participating. Special questionnaires are designed. The follow up after surgery will be at least six months. The primary endpoint is the incidence of surgery related complications. Secondary endpoints are the influence of removal on preoperative symptoms and complaints and the socio-economic consequences.

Discussion

By performing this study we hope to find profound arguments to remove or not to remove metal implants after fracture healing that can help to develop clear guidelines for daily practice.

Trial registration

NTR1297, http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=1297

Implant removal of osteosynthesis: the Dutch practice. Results of a survey

Background

The aim of this survey study was to evaluate the current opinion and practice of trauma and orthopaedic surgeons in the Netherlands in the removal of implants after fracture healing.

Methods

A web-based questionnaire consisting of 44 items was sent to all active members of the Dutch Trauma Society and Dutch Orthopaedic Trauma Society to determine their habits and opinions about implant removal.

Results

Though implant removal is not routinely done in the Netherlands, 89% of the Dutch surgeons agreed that implant removal is a good option in case of pain or functional deficits. Also infection of the implant or bone is one of the main reasons for removing the implant (> 90%), while making money was a motivation for only 1% of the respondents. In case of younger patients (< 40 years of age) only 34% of the surgeons agreed that metal implants should always be removed in this category. Orthopaedic surgeons are more conservative and differ in their opinion about this subject compared to general trauma surgeons (p = 0.002). Though the far majority removes elastic nails in children (95%).

Most of the participants (56%) did not agree that leaving implants in is associated with an increased risk of fractures, infections, allergy or malignancy. Yet in case of the risk of fractures, residents all agreed to this statement (100%) whereas staff specialists disagreed for 71% (p < 0.001). According to 62% of the surgeons titanium plates are more difficult to remove than stainless steel, but 47% did not consider them safer to leave in situ compared to stainless steel. The most mentioned postoperative complications were wound infection (37%), unpleasant scarring (24%) and postoperative hemorraghe (19%).

Conclusion

This survey indicates that there is no general opinion about implant removal after fracture healing with a lack of policy guidelines in the Netherlands. In case of symptomatic patients a majority of the surgeons removes the implant, but this is not standard practice for every surgeon.

In vitro biomechanical evaluation and comparison of a new prototype locking plate and a limited-contact self compression plate for equine fracture repair

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the mechanical properties (strength and stiffness) of a new prototype 4.5 mm broad locking plate (NP-LP) are comparable with those of a traditional 4.5 mm broad limited-contact self compression plate (LC-SCP), and to compare the bending and torsional properties of the NP-LP and LC-SCP when used in osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones (MC3).

METHODS

The plates alone were tested in four-point bending single cycle to failure. The MC3-plate constructs were created with mid-diaphyseal osteotomies with a 1 cm gap. Constructs were tested in four-point bending single cycle to failure, four-point bending cyclic fatigue, and torsion single cycle to failure.

RESULTS

There were not any significant differences in bending strength and stiffness found between the two implants. The MC3-NP-LP construct was significantly stiffer than the MC3-LC-SCP in bending. No other biomechanical differences were found in bending, yield load in torsion, or mean composite rigidity. Mean cycles to failure for bending fatigue testing were similar for both constructs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The NP-LP was comparable to the LC-SCP in intrinsic, as well as structural properties. The NP-LP construct was more rigid than the LC-SCP construct under four-point bending, and both constructs behaved similarly under four-point bending cyclic fatigue testing and torsion single cycle to failure. The new NP-LP implant fixation is biomechanically comparable to the LC-SCP in a simulated MC3 fracture.

A simple technique for removing a locking compression plate with a stripped locking screw

We use a straightforward technique to remove a locking compression plate and a screw with a stripped hexagonal recess. If the hexagonal recess of the screw had been stripped during attempts at screw removal using a conical extraction device, we perform the following procedure after loosening the contact surface between the bone and the plate. Using a larger drill bit, another hole is drilled immediately adjacent to the screw through the nonlocking portion of the combination hole. The plate is struck along the line connecting the screw to the newly formed hole. Using an elevator, leverage force is then applied to the plate, which can be removed with the stripped screw attached. This technique can be used to remove plates with several stripped screws and does not require any special tools.

Intramedullary nailing versus submuscular plating in adolescent femoral fracture

BACKGROUND

Femoral fractures in adolescents usually need operative treatment, but the optimal method is unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare intramedullary nailing (IN) and submuscular plating (SP) in adolescent femoral fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed the prospective, comparison study of IN and SP in adolescent femoral shaft fractures at a mean age of 13.9 years (11-17.4). Twenty-two cases of IN and 23 cases of SP were followed for a minimum of 1 year. We compared radiological and clinical results, surgical parameters, and complications of two techniques.

RESULTS

Bony union was achieved in all cases except one case of IN. Time to union was similar in both groups. None showed mal-union over 10° or limb length discrepancy over 1 cm. None of SP group and 2 in IN group experienced re-operation; one patient had deep infection with nonunion. The other patient sustained mal-rotation. Both patients healed after revision procedure. All patients showed excellent or satisfactory results of Flynn's criteria. The time to full-weight bearing was shorter in IN (IN: 57.3 days, SP: 89.2 days, p<0.05). In surgical parameters, operative time seemed shorter in IN (IN: 94.7 min, SP: 104 min, p=0.095), and fluoroscopy time was shorter in IN (IN: 58s, SP: 109s, p<0.05) than SP group.

CONCLUSION

Although both IN and SP yield good results and minimal complication in adolescent femoral fractures, IN may be advantageous in less need of fluoroscopy, technical easiness in reduction and early weight bearing.

Removal of locking plates: new implant, new challenges and new solutions

Removal of locking plates in many ways poses novel challenges compared to conventional plates. None of the techniques described for the removal of locking plates are adequate for all situations. We report our experience of 27 patients from whom a total of 33 locking plates were removed. We also describe a novel technique for the removal of locking plates which in our experience could be used in most of these patients because it is appropriate for all situations and, from a technical point of view, is easy to use. Our new technique consists of removing the problematic locking screw by cutting the plate on both sides of the screw hole and using the screw head-plate hole unit for removal. We analyzed all these patients for the location of the plate, number of locking screws, time of implant removal since the initial surgery, reason for removal of the plate, nature of the difficulties encountered during surgery, and any perioperative complications. A total of 43 (17.34%) screws were difficult to remove. Twenty screws were found to be stripped, 15 were jammed and 8 were broken. Fourteen of the 20 stripped screws and all 15 jammed screws were removed using our technique. We found this technique of locking plate removal to be very versatile and useful in most of the cases in which removal was difficult. At the same time, it also causes less damage to the bone compared to other techniques.

Dorsal screw penetration following implant removal after volar locked plating of distal radius fracture

Complications while removing implants are quite common. In rare cases screw shanks must be left in situ. We present a case of a 38-year-old patient who was treated using a palmar locking plate for a distal radius fracture. After implant removal, one of the screw shanks left in situ penetrated the dorsal cortex of the distal radius into the third extensor tendon compartment and led to irritation of the extensor pollicis longus tendon. We report the unexpected complication and analysis of possible errors of this case to avoid this kind of complication.

Removal of locked volar plates after distal radius fractures

PURPOSE

We present our experience with removal of locked volar distal radius plates and screws and note the indications for removal, types of plates removed, completeness of hardware removal, and complications occurring during plate removal.

METHODS

We reviewed all distal radial volar locking plates removed at our institution from 2004 to 2009. A total of 28 patients operated on by 5 hand surgeons were identified. We gathered information regarding the incidence of successful removal of hardware and operative findings in cases of difficult removal of hardware.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients (16 women, 12 men) underwent removal of locked volar distal radius plates from 2004 to 2009. The mean length of implantation was 63 weeks (range, 3-223 wk). Reasons for removal of hardware included tenosynovitis, tendon rupture, pain, and prominent or intra-articular hardware. Of 28 cases of locked volar plate removal, 2 had complications. In the first case, a screw was cross-threaded in an earlier generation DVR Hand Innovations plate implanted in 2003. The plate and screw were removed by rotating them out as 1 unit. In the second case, in which the current generation DVR Hand Innovations plate was implanted in 2007, the recess in the screw head had been stripped on insertion. The plate was cut and the remaining fragment of plate and screw were removed together. Despite these difficulties, hardware was successfully removed completely in 28 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series highlights the result that all removals of locked volar plates were successful. There were 2 complications, and strategies for removal are described.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

A prospective, randomised trial comparing closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous plating in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia

We compared the outcome of closed intramedullary nailing with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a percutaneous locked compression plate in patients with a distal metaphyseal fracture in a prospective study. A total of 85 patients were randomised to operative stabilisation either by a closed intramedullary nail (44) or by minimally invasive osteosynthesis with a compression plate (41). Pre-operative variables included the patients' age and the side and pattern of the fracture. Peri-operative variables were the operating time and the radiation time. Postoperative variables were wound problems, the time to union of the fracture, the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle surgery score and removal of hardware. We found no significant difference in the pre-operative variables or in the time to union in the two groups. However, the mean radiation time and operating time were significantly longer in the locked compression plate group (3.0 vs 2.12 minutes, p < 0.001, and 97.9 vs 81.2 minutes, p < 0.001, respectively).After one year, all the fractures had united. Patients who had intramedullary nailing had a higher mean pain score (40 = no pain, 0 = severe pain), [corrected] but better function, alignment and total American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle surgery scores, although the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.234, p = 0.157, p = 0.897, p = 0.177 respectively). Three (6.8%) patients in the intramedullary nailing group and six (14.6%) in the locked compression plate group showed delayed wound healing, and 37 (84.1%) in the former group and 38 (92.7%) in the latter group expressed a wish to have the implant removed. We conclude that both closed intramedullary nailing and a percutaneous locked compression plate can be used safely to treat Orthopaedic Trauma Association type-43A distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia. However, closed intramedullary nailing has the advantage of a shorter operating and radiation time and easier removal of the implant. We therefore prefer closed intramedullary nailing for patients with these fractures.

The concept of locking plates

After a short historical review of locking bone plates since their inception more than a century ago to the success of the concept less than 15 years ago with today's plates, the authors present the main locking mechanisms in use. In the two broad categories - plates with fixed angulation and those with variable angulation - the screw head is locked in the plate with a locknut by screwing in a threaded chamber on the plate or by screwing through an adapted ring. The authors then provide a concrete explanation, based on simple mechanical models, of the fundamental differences between conventional bone plates and locking plates and why a locking screw system presents greater resistance at disassembly, detailing the role played by the position and number of screws. The advantages of epiphyseal fixation are then discussed, including in cases of mediocre-quality bone. For teaching purposes, the authors also present assembly with an apple fixed with five locking screws withstanding a 47-kg axial load with no resulting disassembly. The principles of plate placement are detailed for both the epiphysis and diaphysis, including the number and position of screws and respect of the soft tissues, with the greatest success assured by the minimally invasive and even percutaneous techniques. The authors then present the advantages of locking plates in fixation of periprosthetic fractures where conventional osteosynthesis often encounters limited success. Based on simplified theoretical cases, the economic impact in France of this type of implant is discussed, showing that on average it accounts for less than 10% of the overall cost of this pathology to society. Finally, the possible problems of material ablation are discussed as well as the means to remediate these problems.