Open arthrolysis and hinged external fixation for posttraumatic ankylosed elbows

Rehabilitation after surgical release of the stiff elbow: A literature review

Background

Elbow stiffness poses a significant challenge for surgeons as well as physiotherapists during and after surgery. To date, there is no consensus regarding the subsequent rehabilitation after surgical release of the stiff elbow.

Objective

The aim is to evaluate the most important therapeutic strategies following open or arthroscopic release of the stiff elbow based on a comprehensive literature review, and to develop a consensus for or against specific therapeutic methods with the help of a survey among elbow experts of the D-A-CH Association for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (DVSE).

Methods

Literature search was performed based on guidelines, the "health technology assessments", systematic reviews and clinical studies that examined rehabilitation after osteocapsular release of the stiff elbow. The databases of the "Guidelines International Network", various national guidelines, PubMed, the "Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials", the "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews", and the "Physiotherapy Evidence Database" were scanned, each for the period from January 1989 to December 2019. As part of an online survey, all active members of the DVSE were asked about their strategies in immediate aftercare and rehabilitation after elbow arthrolysis.

Results

A total of 5 reviews and 55 articles could be identified from 107 articles since 1989, which served as the basis for the preparation of an evidence-based aftercare recommendation. By reviewing all the mentioned paper and evaluation of the survery of DVSE members, a basic concept could be finalized.

Comparative study of open elbow arthrolysis with and without hinge external fixation for the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to compare the functional outcomes of hinged external fixators and non-external fixation in open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) for post-traumatic elbow stiffness (PTES) and to evaluate their applicability and limitations in patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with PTES treated with OEA at our hospital between March 2015 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The assessed variables were the operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, duration of hospitalization, and treatment costs. The elbow range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (Q-DASH) score, Oxford Elbow score (OES), Broberg and Morrey score (BMS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and complications such as pin tract infection and heterotopic ossification were compared between patients with and without hinge external fixation. We also compared the baseline characteristics and functional outcomes of patients with and without hinge external fixation.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients (48 patients with hinged external fixators and 108 patients without external fixators) diagnosed with PTES were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 15.8 ± 3.6 months. Compared with patients without external fixators, those with external fixators showed significantly greater improvements in elbow flexion and extension ROM (59.6° ± 26.1° vs. 46.2° ± 26.2°, p = 0.004) but had a significantly longer duration of hospitalization (p < 0.001), significantly longer operation time (p < 0.001), significantly higher treatment costs (p < 0.001), and significantly greater intraoperative blood loss volume (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of improvement in elbow rotation ROM, MEPS score, VAS score for pain, OES score, Q-DASH score, BMS score, or incidence of complications.

CONCLUSION

The use of a hinged external fixator in open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness may result in short-term improvements in flexion-extension range of motion but is accompanied by increased blood loss, longer operative time, extended hospitalization, and higher costs. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Comparative study of the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis with or without external fixation for severe elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach open arthrolysis with and without hinged external fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of patients with severe elbow stiffness who were treated in our institution from January 2018 to January 2019. All of them were treated with combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis. There were 20 patients who had the hinged external fixation placed and 29 patients without the placement of the external fixation. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 28.4 ± 3.7 months. There were no significant differences in the ROM of the elbow, MEPS, VAS, DASH, or complications between the two groups. The operation time and treatment cost of the patients without external fixation were significantly lower than patients with external fixation.

CONCLUSION

Combined medial-lateral approach open elbow arthrolysis without external fixation is a safe and effective way to treat elbow stiffness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Midterm Outcomes After Open Arthrolysis for Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Open arthrolysis is used for treating elbow stiffness in adults. This study evaluated the midterm outcomes after open arthrolysis in children and adolescents with posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

Data of 31 children and adolescents with posttraumatic elbow stiffness following open arthrolysis with or without hinged external fixation from 2010 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Their mean age was 15 (range: 6 to 19) years. At baseline and the follow-up (>4 y), we evaluated the outcomes (range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Index) and postoperative complications (pain, ulnar nerve symptoms, infections, and instability) and analyzed the association between outcomes and clinical variables.

RESULTS

The Mayo Elbow Performance Index improved from 67.9 (range: 35 to 95 points) to 93.7 points (range: 65 to 100 points; P<0.001). The elbow active flexion/extension arc increased significantly from 49 degrees (range: 0 to 120 degrees) to 108 degrees (range: 0 to 120 degrees; P<0.001), with a mean flexion of 123 degrees (range: 70 to 140 degrees; P<0.001) and mean extension of 15 degrees (range: 0 to 85 degrees; P<0.001) postoperatively. The increasing age at surgery was associated with improved elbow motions (P=0.004). Patients with increased preoperative serum alkaline phosphatase level demonstrated decreased arc of motion (P=0.015). Patients with extra-articular fractures had better outcomes than the other patients. At the final follow-up, 8 patients experienced recurrent contracture in the flexion arc with heterotopic ossification. Two patients had postoperative pain, 1 elbow instability, and 1 ulnar neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients showed satisfactory functional outcomes after arthrolysis, indicating that open release with or without hinged external fixation is an effective and maintained technique for children and adolescents with posttraumatic elbow stiffness. The age at surgery, preoperative alkaline phosphatase level, and injury type should be considered to achieve good outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

Modified Lateral Approach of the Elbow for Surgical Release and Synovectomy

Elbow stiffness is a common reason for consultation. In recent years, arthroscopic techniques in elbow surgery have progressed, but there are still some contraindications to performance of arthroscopic synovectomy and release in this joint (elbows with anatomic deformity after multiple procedures, malunion, presence of osteosynthesis material, severe stiffness of >80 degrees, instability, or previous transposition of the ulnar nerve). Therefore, knowledge of a safe and reliable open approach to achieve elbow release and/or synovectomy is essential. We report the technical details of the modified lateral approach between extensor carpi radialis brevis and longus muscles, as well as the clinical results of 43 elbow release and/or synovectomy procedures, illustrating its feasibility. The modified lateral approach, providing visual control of the radial nerve and good anterior exposure of the elbow joint, is detailed. From 1994 to 2016, this approach was used in 43 release and/or synovectomy procedures of the elbow in 41 patients, 30 men and 11 women, with a mean age of 40.56 years (range, 17 to 84 y). Using this procedure, 38 elbows (93%) recovered full extension and 5 subtotal extension with an average deficit of 11 degrees (range, 5 to 20 degrees). All elbows were stable. No neurological complications were reported. The modified lateral approach preserves the insertion of the lateral epicondyle muscles that are major dynamic stabilizers and reduces the risk of instability. Initially described for the treatment of radial tunnel syndrome, it should also be recommended for elbow release and synovectomy.

A new pathologic classification for elbow stiffness based on our experience in 216 patients

BACKGROUND

Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. This study aimed to develop a new pathologic classification to further understand and standardize elbow arthrolysis from a new perspective, as well as to determine clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Extension-flexion dysfunction was classified into 4 types: EF_I, tethers alone; EF_II, tethers with blocks; EF_III, articular malformation; and EF_IV, bony ankylosis. Forearm rotation dysfunction was classified into 3 types: FR_I, contracture alone; FR_II, radial head malunion or nonunion; and FR_III, proximal radioulnar bony ankylosis. A total of 216 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included and categorized preoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by the same chief surgeon; different types underwent specific procedures. Patient data, elbow motion, and functional scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 40° preoperatively to 118° at final follow-up; 88% of patients regained ROM of 100° or greater. The forearm rotation arc (FRA) with forearm rotation dysfunction increased from a preoperative mean of 76° to 128°; 82% of patients regained an FRA of 100° or greater. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) increased from 63 to 91 points; the proportion of patients with good or excellent results was 95%. EF_I patients had the best ROM (129°) and MEPI (93 points) and EF_IV patients achieved the most-changed ROM (116°), whereas EF_III patients had the worst ROM (104°) and MEPI (84 points) and the least-changed ROM (64°). The FRA was best in FR_I patients (142°), followed by FR_II patients (118°), and worst in FR_III patients (82°); in contrast, the changed FRA was greatest in FR_III patients (82°), followed by FR_II patients (64°), and least in FR_I patients (37°).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the proposed pathologic classification provides a new perspective on the understanding and standardization of elbow arthrolysis, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes.

The use of static external fixation for chronic instability of the elbow

BACKGROUND

Chronic elbow instability after trauma is a challenging problem. Clinical results of external elbow fixation in this setting are limited, with most studies focusing on hinged external fixation. A static fixator is an alternative for maintaining joint reduction. Advantages of a static frame include ease of application, decreased need for special instrumentation, and more secure maintenance of a concentrically reduced joint in the setting of bone or soft tissue instability. The primary limitation of static fixation is the potential for stiffness.

METHODS

This retrospective review represents the largest reported cohort evaluating the use of static elbow external fixation for the treatment of chronic elbow instability. Twenty-seven cases treated by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2015 were identified.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were available for a clinical evaluation, including radiographs and a physical examination at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (range, 1.4-12.4 years). Of note, 19 of 20 were clinically obese or overweight. At final evaluation, range of motion averaged from 20° ± 13° of extension to 134° ± 9° of flexion. All patients had stable elbows, except 1 patient who had valgus and varus laxity on stress examination. Radiographs of this patient showed an incongruous joint. Eight patients required an additional operation after external fixator removal, 3 for infection and 5 for stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

At almost 6 years of follow-up, static elbow external fixator resulted in a congruous joint with adequate functional and clinical outcomes in 95% of patients.

[Treatment of elbow joint stiffness by open release combined with distal radius fixation hinged external fixation]

Objective

To observe the effectiveness of open release combined with distal radius fixation hinged external fixation for the treatment of elbow stiffness.

Methods

A total of 77 patients with elbow stiffness caused by trauma were enrolled in this study between October 2014 and October 2015. The patients were divided into control group (39 cases) and observation group (38 cases) by random number table method. The patients in the observation group were treated with elbow joint opening and release combined with distal radial fixation hinged external fixation, while the control group was treated with traditional release. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease causes, original damage diagnosis, the time from injury to operation, preoperative flexion and extension activity of elbow joint, and preoperative Mayo elbow joint function score between 2 groups ( P>0.05). After operation, the function of elbow joint was evaluated by the flexion and extension activity of the elbow joint and the Mayo elbow joint function evaluation standard.

Results

The incisions healed by first intention in 2 groups. In observation group, there were 1 case infection of nail tract, 2 cases ulnar nerve symptoms, 1 case elbow ossification, and 1 case moderate pain in the elbow; while in control group, there were 2 cases of infection of nail tract, 2 cases of ulnar nerve symptoms, and 3 cases moderate pain in the elbow. The patients in 2 groups were followed up 6 weeks to 12 months, with an average of 6 months. The flexion and extension activity of elbow joint and Mayo elbow joint function score at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05); at last follow-up, the flexion and extension activity of elbow joint and Mayo elbow joint function score in observation group patients were significantly better than those in control group ( P<0.05). According to the Mayo elbow function evaluation standard, the results were excellent in 27 cases, good in 10 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 97.4% in observation group; and the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 21 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.6% in control group; showing no significant difference between 2 groups ( P=0.108).

Conclusion

Open release combined with distal radius fixation hinged external fixation can significantly improve the elbow function of patients with traumatic elbow stiffness, its recovery of elbow function was superior to the traditional release.

The timing of open surgical release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Open release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness is effective in restoring elbow function, but there is no guideline on the optimal time point of surgical release so far. The purpose of this article was to summarize the current available literature reporting on the timing of open release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched with a set of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Manual searches for references were performed to find potential relevant studies. Two authors separately extracted data from all the articles selected.

RESULTS

27 articles published between 1989 and 2017 were included with an overall enrollment of 836 patients. We divided all included studies into 3 groups according to the timing of surgical release: group 1 (6-10 months after injury), group 2 (11-20 months after injury), and group 3(>20 months after injury). The mean postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and recurrence rate were similar among the 3 groups; however, the mean gain in arc of motion in group 1 was the highest with the lowest complication rate among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

There was a trend toward a shorter waiting time from injury to open arthrolysis from 12 months to 6 months. The shorter waiting period of 6 to 10 months yielded better results. Therefore, early surgical release of stiff elbows is recommended for a shorter rehabilitation time and earlier return to work.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Systematic Review.

An X-ray-free method to accurately identify the elbow flexion-extension axis for the placement of a hinged external fixator

PURPOSE

Identifying the elbow flexion-extension (F-E) movement axis is important for placing a hinged elbow external fixator. An X-ray fluoroscopy-based method is widely used in clinical practice, exposing the patient and surgeons to high doses of radiation. Additionally, the accuracy and repeatability of the fluoroscopy-based method are very low and affected by subjective factors.

METHODS

To solve this problem, an X-ray-free method based on kinematics analysis was proposed to identify the elbow F-E movement axis, and a navigation system was built to guide the placement of the elbow external fixator.

RESULTS

Our X-ray-free navigation method is more repeatable than the current X-ray fluoroscopy method used clinically. Both our algorithm and the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) algorithm showed high accuracy and repeatability to identify the axis.

CONCLUSIONS

The method proposed in this study is very promising to avoid a large dose of X-ray radiation and increases the repeatability and performance of identifying the elbow F-E movement axis for the placement of the hinged elbow external fixator.

Effect on muscle strength of the upper extremities after open elbow arthrolysis

Background

Open elbow arthrolysis manipulates tendons and soft tissues surrounding the elbow and may lead to strength decline after the operation. We hypothesized that strength of elbow and wrist motions and handgrip could be compromised after the procedure and that the strength recovery pattern may differ between men and women and between the dominant and nondominant side.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. We monitored 32 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness who underwent open arthrolysis between June 2014 and December 2014. All patients underwent standardized postoperative physical therapy. Preoperative and postoperative isometric strength were measured by a handheld dynamometer. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and arc of motion (AOM) were also analyzed.

Results

Mean follow-up was 26.13 months. Significant improvement was noticed in mean AOM (from 46° to 127°) and MEPS (from 67.97 to 96.86). No significant decline was noted in isometric strength at the last follow-up day. The strength ratios between men and women showed no significant difference from postoperative day 7 to the last follow-up day. At all follow-up assessments, isometric strength showed no significant difference between the dominant and nondominant side.

Conclusions

AOM and MEPS achieved significant enhancement after open elbow arthrolysis. The procedure did not lead to isometric strength decline. Postoperative gain of strength was proportional to the baseline strength level of each muscle group, and men had a more prominent gain of strength than women during the entire follow-up. Dominance had no effect on postoperative strength recovery.

The influence of body mass index on outcome of open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

Being overweight has become a serious public health concern in China. Higher body mass index has been proven to be associated with poor outcome after orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of being overweight on functional outcomes and complications after open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including 122 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness undergoing arthrolysis, including 84 in the normal weight group and 38 in the overweight group. Demographic data, surgical data, and data on preoperative and postoperative functional performance and complications were obtained.

RESULTS

Demographic data and disease characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups at baseline. All patients showed significant improvement after elbow arthrolysis. Postoperatively, the range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the normal weight group were significantly better than those of the overweight group. Sixteen patients developed postoperative complications. No significant differences in complication rates between the 2 groups were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients showed satisfactory functional outcomes after arthrolysis. The postoperative functional outcomes of the overweight group were inferior to those of the normal weight group to a certain extent. This study underlines the importance of detailed rehabilitation instructions in patients with higher body mass index.

Restoring independency with an osteochondral graft of the navicular for coronoid process reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

The coronoid is a crucial element for elbow stability. In case of posttraumatic instability or reduced range of motion, a complex reconstruction might be necessary.

CASE

We present the case of a polytraumatized patient with complex upper extremity injury and initial poor outcome. Subluxation after initial surgery was treated by sublime tubercle reconstruction with a corticocancellous iliac crest graft. Due to massive ossification, the elbow remained stiff and the paraplegic patient was unable to use a manually propelled wheelchair. After arthrolysis, the unstable elbow was treated with an osteocartilaginous graft from the navicular of the foot as well as ulnar and radial collateral ligamentoplasties. At the time of follow-up, the patient had a stable joint and was able to independently perform activities of daily living.

CONCLUSION

An autologous navicular graft seems to be an excellent option for our paraplegic patient as the shape matches the sublime tubercle of the ulna.

Open arthrolysis for elbow stiffness increases carrying angle but has no impact on functional recovery

BACKGROUND

With the exception of normal anatomic changes in the medial collateral ligament and radial head, other factors related to carrying angle changes have not been systematically studied. We reviewed patients who underwent open arthrolysis of the elbow, and evaluated if open arthrolysis could change carrying angle. We then identified factors associated with carrying angle changes.

METHODS

Fifty patients with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up after open arthrolysis were evaluated retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative carrying angles were compared.

RESULTS

The carrying angles of 36 elbows in 36 patients were unchanged after surgery (Group A), while the carrying angles of 14 elbows in 14 patients increased postoperatively (Group B). In Group A, mean postoperative extension and flexion were 7° (range 0-24°) and 125° (range 10-135°) respectively, while mean postoperative pronation and supination were 60° (range 50-80°) and 65° (range 30-85°), respectively. In Group B, mean postoperative extension and flexion were 25° (range 0-40°) and 128° (range 60-138°), while mean postoperative pronation and supination were 65° (range 45-85°) and 60° (range 45-75°), respectively. No significant difference in range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

During open arthrolysis, humeral trochlea debridement and techniques for improving forearm rotation could increase carrying angle. However, this had no impact on elbow functional recovery.

Ulnar neuritis after open elbow arthrolysis combined with ulnar nerve subcutaneous transposition for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: outcome and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Ulnar neuritis (UN) is a common complication of open elbow arthrolysis for elbow stiffness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve during open elbow arthrolysis and to describe the risk factors for UN.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 260 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness who underwent routine ulnar nerve transposition during open elbow arthrolysis. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and incidence and reoperation rate of UN were recorded. UN was defined as new-onset ulnar nerve symptoms and no relief or worsening of pre-existing ulnar nerve symptoms during the period of postoperative rehabilitation. Factors affecting the development of UN were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 9.2% of the patients had UN, 25% of whom required reoperation for progressive neuropathy. The Dellon grade of patients associated with UN at last follow-up improved significantly compared with that preoperatively. The mean arc of motion in patients with UN decreased during follow-up in a time-dependent manner. Univariate analysis showed that male sex, limited preoperative flexion and arc of motion, preoperative heterotopic ossification (HO), and preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms were significantly associated with the development of UN. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that preoperative HO was the only independent risk factor for the development of UN.

CONCLUSIONS

UN is still an important complication, although ulnar nerve subcutaneous transposition was performed during open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Identified risk factors for UN, especially preoperative HO, should be taken into consideration before surgery.

Open arthrolysis with pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon for treating post-traumatic contracture of the elbow

BACKGROUND

Extensive loss of elbow flexion compromises the performance of daily activities. We examined the clinical outcomes of patients with post-traumatic extension contracture of the elbow treated with open arthrolysis and pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 7 patients (5 men and 2 women; mean age, 35 years) who underwent open arthrolysis via a combined lateral and medial approach with pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon for the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness. All the patients had heterotopic ossification that restricted elbow motion and underwent removal of the ossified tissue and capsular release. The triceps tendon was gradually stretched by making multiple stab incisions on the tendon by using a No. 11 surgical blade. The range of motion of the elbow was recorded both preoperatively and at the final postoperative follow-up. Elbow function was assessed with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for a mean of 24 months. After treatment, significant improvement was noted in the total arc of motion (from 44° to 116°, P <.001), mean flexion (from 80° to 124°, P < .001), and mean extension (from 31° to 8°, P = .004). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved significantly from 59 points preoperatively to 92 points at the final evaluation. No major postoperative complications developed in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that open arthrolysis with pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon is an effective and safe treatment approach for post-traumatic extension contracture of the elbow.

The efficacy of celecoxib in preventing heterotopic ossification recurrence after open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness in adults

BACKGROUND

Heterotopic ossification (HO) recurrence after joint surgery is always a disturbing problem for patients and surgeons. Our study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of celecoxib in preventing the recurrence of HO after open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 152 patients with stiff elbows caused by post-traumatic HO. After surgery, 77 patients received celecoxib (200 mg once daily) for 28 days, whereas 75 did not. Radiographic evaluation was performed at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine which factors affected HO recurrence.

RESULTS

HO was both more common and more severe in the no-celecoxib group than in the celecoxib group at 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery. A significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative extension (P = .030), flexion (P = .008), and pronation (P = .005); however, no significant difference in postoperative supination was noted (P = .622). Logistic regression analysis showed that taking celecoxib was the protective factor for HO recurrence, whereas overweight (body mass index > 25) and male gender were the risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

A short course of celecoxib aids in the prevention of HO recurrence after open arthrolysis for elbow stiffness in adults and could be an effective and safe option.

Complications of Open Elbow Arthrolysis in Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness: A Systematic Review

Objective

The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature for a more comprehensive understanding of the complications of open elbow arthrolysis in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness and provide a reference for better prevention and treatment of them.

Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched for therapeutic studies with a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from selected articles, and a statistical analysis was performed to evaluate related factors and management of the complications.

Results

Twenty-eight articles published between 1989 and 2013, involving 810 patients, were included. Most of the complications included in the selected articles were nerve complications, heterotopic ossification, elbow instability, infection, pin-related complications and repeat elbow contracture. The total complication rate was 24.3% ± 3.0%, and the reoperation rate was 34.0%. Furthermore, the statistical analysis revealed that preoperative range of motion (β = -0.004, P = 0.01) and proportion of female (β = 0.336, P = 0.04) were the independent factors affecting the total complication rate.

Conclusions

Various risk factors are related to each of the complications, and we found that patients with less preoperative ROM and a higher proportion of female gender may point to a higher total complication rate. Therefore, to further improve the overall outcomes of this procedure, more and larger prospective studies should be performed to further elucidate the effects of prophylactic interventions targeting the risk factors, thus improving the methods of prevention and treatment of complications.

Stability of severely stiff elbows after complete open release: treatment by ligament repair with suture anchors and hinged external fixator

BACKGROUND

Instability is a crucial issue in severe post-traumatic elbow stiffness during complete-release surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ligament repair using a suture anchor in the operative treatment of severely stiff elbows for which a hinged external fixator was indicated.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 46 cases of severely stiff elbows (flexion arc <60°) undergoing open release. During the operation, all 46 elbows were noted to have instability. Suture anchors were applied to restore the ligament if it was impossible to repair the ligament directly, and a hinged external fixator was simultaneously applied to protect the vulnerable ligament and facilitate rehabilitation. No allograft or autograft was used in any of our cases. The stability, arc of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, ulnar nerve symptoms, and radiographs were evaluated.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 24.3 months, the postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 91 points, as compared with 63 points preoperatively. The mean flexion arc improved from 25° to 126°. Three patients presented with moderate elbow instability when the hinged external fixator was removed; however, all of them regained stability by the last follow-up. Furthermore, 7 cases of new-onset nerve palsy were noted; however, all of them resolved with conservative management. None of the patients required secondary surgery for any reason.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of an avulsed collateral ligament with suture anchors and hinged external fixation was effective in restoring functional mobility in patients with severe post-traumatic elbow stiffness after complete release. This could be an option for treating ankylosed, severely or very severely stiff elbows.

Is routine ulnar nerve transposition necessary in open release of stiff elbows? Our experience and a literature review

PURPOSE

Prophylactic release of the ulnar nerve to reduce the incidence of postoperative nerve symptoms in stiff elbows has been recommended. However, the necessity for routine anterior transposition remains unclear. In this study, we aim to gain an insight into the value of routine transposition in open release of stiff elbows.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 94 patients suffering from elbow stiffness with no pre-operative ulnar nerve symptoms. Simple decompression (with in situ decompression or epicondylectomy) and subcutaneous anterior transposition were chronologically performed in 53 and 37 patients, respectively. Another four patients were treated by a single lateral approach with no intervention of the ulnar nerve. Pre- and postoperative range of motion and incidence of ulnar nerve symptoms were recorded. The function of ulnar nerve was measured by Amadio rating scale.

RESULTS

The incidence of ulnar nerve dysfuction was 18.9% (ten of 53) and 8.1% (three of 37) in the simple decompression and transposition groups, respectively. The mean Amadio scores were 7.62 and 8.22, respectively. All these data showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). In the lateral approach group, 50 % (two of four) of patients developed nerve symptoms with a mean Amadio score of 6.50.

CONCLUSIONS

The transposition group exhibited a superior nervous outcomes compared with the simple decompression group. No comparison was conducted between the transposition and lateral approach groups because of too few patients in the latter. According to related literature and our experience, we conclude that routine transposition is necessary to prevent postoperative nerve symptoms.

Heterotopic ossification of the elbow treated with surgical resection: risk factors, bony ankylosis, and complications

BACKGROUND

Heterotopic ossification is the most common extrinsic cause of elbow contracture and may lead to clinically important stiffness, and rarely, complete bony ankylosis. Surgery sometimes is performed to treat this problem, and published reports differ regarding the factors that are associated with success or failure after this operation and whether the procedure is effective for patients with elbow ankylosis.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We wished (1) to identify potential patient characteristics and modifiable risk factors that are associated with improvements in ROM after surgery for heterotopic ossification of the elbow; (2) to compare ROM gains between patients with complete ankylosis and partially restricted ROM; and (3) to characterize the complications of elbows treated by surgical release and excision of heterotopic ossification followed by a standardized rehabilitation program.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of all patients treated operatively for heterotopic ossification of the elbow from September 1999 to February 2012 at one institution by one surgeon. General indications for the surgery were clinically symptomatic or debilitating heterotopic ossification of the elbow. Each patient received prophylaxis postoperatively consisting of indomethacin (or single-shot radiation for patients with sensitivity to antiinflammatory medications). All patients received a physical therapy regimen and used a continuous passive motion machine for 6 weeks. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, time between injury and surgery, and medical history were reviewed for comparison. Followup was at a mean of 13 months (range, 3-106 months); no patients were lost to followup. Thirty-nine patients (46 elbows) with heterotopic ossification treated with excision were identified: 10 patients (16 elbows) had burns, 28 patients (29 elbows) had trauma, and one patient (one elbow) had a closed head injury. Eight of the 39 patients (12 of 46 elbows [26%]) had complete ankylosis at the time of surgery.

RESULTS

Hypertension, obesity, and absence of intraoperative anterior ulnar nerve transposition were associated with an adverse effect on change from preoperative to final arc of motion. The group with ankylosis had greater preoperative to postoperative gain in arc compared with the group with partial restriction (96°, 95% CI, 84°-107° and 59°, 95% CI, 46°-72°, respectively). For the entire cohort there was an overall improvement in mean flexion-extension arc of motion from 35° to 103° at final followup (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 57°-80°), with a 17% rate of complications (three patients [three elbows] with heterotopic ossification, three patients [three elbows] with nerve palsies, one patient [one elbow] with deep wound infection, and one patient [one elbow] with an unstable elbow).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with partially and completely restricted ROM showed substantial improvement in postoperative ROM. Hypertension, obesity, and absence of intraoperative anterior ulnar nerve transposition were negative predictors of outcome in our series. Surgery combined with postoperative prophylaxis and a regimented rehabilitation program are feasible modalities to treat patients with heterotopic ossification of the elbow.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Improvements in elbow motion after resection of heterotopic bone: a systematic review

Complex elbow trauma, severe burn, or a closed head injury render patients at risk for developing heterotopic ossification around the elbow. When heterotopic ossification restricts elbow motion, some patients request surgical resection. We performed a systematic review of the literature to analyze improvement in elbow motion after resection of heterotopic ossification around the elbow. We found that, on average, etiology had little impact on outcome after resection of heterotopic ossification. Resection of heterotopic bone generally leads to improvement of elbow function.

Intrawound application of vancomycin reduces wound infection after open release of post-traumatic stiff elbows: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

With the improvements in wound healing through the use of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics and technical refinements, postoperative elbow infections have become less common but still occur in certain elective elbow surgeries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic application of vancomycin into the operative site to reduce the incidence of infection after the open release of post-traumatic stiff elbows.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 272 such patients during a 4-year period was performed. In the control group (93 patients), simple prophylaxis with standard intravenous antibiotics was performed; in the vancomycin group (179 patients), vancomycin powder was applied directly into the wound before closure along with standard intravenous prophylaxis.

RESULTS

After a follow-up of at least 6 months, the control group was found to have 6 infections (6.45%; confidence interval: 2.40%-13.52%) compared with none (0%; confidence interval: 0-2%.04%) in the vancomycin group, which was a statistically significant difference (P = .0027). No adverse effects were documented from the direct use of the vancomycin powder.

CONCLUSIONS

The local application of vancomycin powder may be a promising means of preventing postoperative elbow infections after elbow release in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

Sliding external fixator "a product design and cadaveric experiment"

BACKGROUND

External fixation spanning a joint like the elbow, while maintaining joint mobility, is a well-established practice, and it could be done with a variety of external fixation systems. In current systems, correct identification of the elbow center of rotation under X-ray guidance with lateral views is mandatory. If the center of rotation of the fixator is not aligned with that of the elbow joint, the assembly will not work. This new design idea aims to propagate the principle of sliding external fixation applied on the extensor side of a joint, with the limbs of the fixator being able to slide in and out during joint extension and flexion, respectively, without hindering the joint movement, without the need to use X-ray guidance to identify the center of rotation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cadaveric experiment was carried on using a sliding fixator prototype applies on two cadaveric elbow specimens, which were tested though the arc of movement.

RESULTS

Assembling the fixator over the intact elbows without identifying the center of rotation did not impede the joint movement. Furthermore, after surgical dislocation of the elbow, the external fixator was able to keep the joint congruent, throughout the movement arc.

CONCLUSION

It was possible to apply a sliding external fixator on the extensor surface of a joint without identifying the center of rotation, and that does not seem to impede the joint movement, while can still keep the dislocated joint congruent despite attempted distraction.

Arthrolysis combined with reconstruction for treatment of terrible triad injury with a poor outcome after surgical as well as conservative intervention

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of terrible triad injury with a poor outcome after intervention has not been successful thus far. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of arthrolysis and reconstruction in the treatment of terrible triad injury with a poor outcome after surgical as well as conservative intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve patients (12 elbows) with the diagnosis of terrible triad injury were respectively reviewed. All the 12 patients had elbow dysfunction after conservative and surgical treatment of the terrible triad injury. Preoperatively, the flexion arc and forearm rotation were 36.7° ± 28.5° and 51.3° ± 43.4°, respectively, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 56.3 points. The mean interval between the primary injury and our surgical treatment was 6.6 months. Our surgical intervention included elbow arthrolysis, ulnar nerve transposition, radial head replacement, coronoid process and ligament repair, and hinged external fixation. Patients were encouraged to participate in rehabilitation training 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 20.1 months; the flexion arc and forearm rotation were 122° ± 18° and 140° ± 20°, respectively, and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 94.6 points (9 excellent, 3 good). Concentric stability was restored in all elbows. Complications included superficial pin tract infection (1), heterotopic ossification (3), and ulnar nerve palsy (1); the ulnar nerve symptoms had improved at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of open arthrolysis and reconstruction performed at a mean interval of 6-month posttrauma can restore functional mobility in cases of terrible triad injury with a poor outcome after surgical as well as conservative intervention. Thus, it may be an effective alternative for the treatment of the poor outcome terrible triad injury. We recommend early functional rehabilitation with adherence to the guidelines for hinged external fixation.