Arthroscopic knotless suprapectoral tenodesis of the long head of biceps: clinical and structural results

Reliable Clinical and Sonographic Outcomes of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using an All-Suture Anchor Onlay Technique

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and structural integrity of primary subpectoral biceps tenodesis using an all-suture anchor onlay technique for long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon pathology.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case series with prospectively collected data of patients who underwent primary, isolated subpectoral biceps tenodesis with a single all-suture anchor onlay fixation between March 2017 and March 2019. Outcomes were recorded at a minimum follow-up of 12 months based on assessments of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, LHB score, and elbow flexion strength and supination strength measurements. The integrity of the tenodesis construct was evaluated using ultrasound.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were available for clinical and ultrasound examination at a mean follow-up of 18 ± 5 months. The mean ASES score significantly improved from 51.0 ± 14.2 points preoperatively to 89.8 ± 10.5 points postoperatively (P < .001). The minimal clinically important difference for the ASES score was 8.7 points, which was exceeded by 31 patients (91.2%). The mean postoperative LHB score was 92.2 ± 8.3 points. Regarding subcategories, an average of 47.2 ± 6.3 points was reached for "pain/cramps"; 26.4 ± 6.1 points, "cosmesis"; and 18.6 ± 2.6 points, "elbow flexion strength." Both elbow flexion strength and supination strength were similar compared with the nonoperated side (P = .169 and P = .210, respectively). In 32 patients, ultrasound examination showed an intact tenodesis construct, whereas 2 patients (5.9%) sustained failure of the all-suture anchor fixation requiring revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary subpectoral biceps tenodesis using an all-suture anchor onlay technique for pathology of the LHB tendon provides reliable clinical results and a relatively low failure rate (5.9%).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

The Loop Tenodesis Procedure-From Biomechanics to First Clinical Results

(1) Introduction: Several surgical therapy options for the treatment of pathologies of the long biceps tendon (LHB) have been established. However, tenotomy, as well as established tenodesis techniques, has disadvantages, such as cosmetic deformities, functional impairments and residual shoulder pain. This study presents the first clinical and structural results of the recently introduced loop tenodesis procedure for the LHB, developed to overcome these issues. (2) Methods: 37 patients (11 women, 26 men, mean age 52 years), who underwent loop tenodesis of the LHB were examined six months after surgery. For the clinical evaluation the Constant score, as well as the LHB score, were used, complemented by elbow flexion and supination strength measurements. The integrity of the tenodesis construct was evaluated indirectly by sonographic detection of the LHB in the bicipital groove. (3) Results: Both, the overall Constant score as well as the LHB score showed significant improvements six months postoperatively, as compared to the preoperative value. Fourteen patients (38%) presented an examiner-dependent upper arm deformity, although only five patients (13%) reported subjective cosmetic deformities. Both, flexion and supination strength were preserved compared to the preoperative level. In 35 patients (95%), the tenodesis in the bicipital groove was proofed sonographically. (4) Conclusion: The loop tenodesis of the LHB provides good-to-excellent overall clinical results after a short-term follow-up of six month. The incidence of cosmetic deformities was inferior compared to conventional therapy options (tenotomy and anchor tenodesis).

Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy in isolated LHB lesions: a prospective randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Currently there exists no clear evidence concerning the surgical treatment of LHB lesions with either tenotomy or tenodesis. The aim of the study is therefore to evaluate elbow flexion and forearm supination force as well as the biceps muscle distalization according to both techniques in isolated LHB lesions.

METHODS

Consecutive patients aged 40-70 years with shoulder arthroscopies for isolated SLAP or biceps pulley lesions were prospectively randomized to arthroscopic suprapectoral intraosseous LHB tenodesis or tenotomy. Pre-, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the SST, ASES, Constant-Murley and LHB scores were recorded. The elbow flexion force was measured in 10°/90° flexion, the supination force in neutral/pronation position. In addition, the maximum upper-arm circumference and its position relative to the radial epicondyle of the humerus were evaluated preoperatively and in follow-up.

RESULTS

20/22 patients (mean age 52.0 ± 8.5; range 36-63 years, 11 male) completed the follow-up. 9/20 were treated with LHB tenodesis (mean age 51.5 ± 9.5; range 37-63 years, 7 male) and 11/20 with tenotomy (mean age 52.8 ± 8.0; range 36-62 years, 4 male). The force measurements and scores showed no significant difference after 12 months. Tenodesis achieved a significant increase in force 6 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively. One tenodesis patient and three tenotomy patients showed a postoperative popeye-sign deformity.

CONCLUSION

This prospective randomized study comparing LHB tenodesis and tenotomy in isolated LHB lesions has shown no significant difference in elbow flexion and forearm supination force and clinical scores after 12 months. After LHB tenotomy, there was a non-significant trend for a higher rate of popeye-sign deformities of the upper arm and biceps muscle cramps.

Clinical and sonographic evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis with a dual suture anchor technique demonstrates improved outcomes and a low failure rate at a minimum 2-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and integrity of an open subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a dual suture anchor construct.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with at least 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively evaluated for simple shoulder test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, function and satisfaction. A physical exam assessed shoulder range of motion and elbow strength. Ultrasonography visualized construct integrity.

RESULTS

Of 43 eligible patients, 36 completed questionnaire evaluation and 22 completed an additional physical examination. Indications included superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions (4), partial thickness tears (6), instability (6), and tenosynovitis of the biceps tendon (20). Eighteen patients (50%) had an associated rotator cuff tear. Patient-reported outcomes improved pre- vs postoperatively: ASES score (45.4 vs 78.6, P < 0.001), SST (5.1 vs 9.6, P < 0.001), pain-VAS (4.8 vs 2.0, P < 0.001), and function-VAS (4.9 vs 2.3, P < 0.001). Satisfaction-VAS was 8.3 postoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes did not differ for patients with an associated rotator cuff tear compared to those without (P ≥ 0.427). None of the physical exam measures were lower on the operative side compared to the healthy side (P ≥ 0.516). Sonographic evaluation revealed preserved integrity of the tenodesis construct in all cases. No complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Subpectoral biceps tenodesis utilizing a dual suture anchor technique is a treatment option for SLAP lesions, partial thickness tears, subluxation, and tenosynovitis of the long head of the biceps with high rates of postoperative patient satisfaction, a low failure rate, and improved outcome scores. The presence of a concomitant rotator cuff tear did not influence clinical outcomes.

[Arthroscopic tenodesis or tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon in preselected patients : Does it make a difference?]

BACKGROUND

Are there clinical, cosmetic and/or structural differences between tenotomy and tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHB) in patients selected according to commonly used indication criteria?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 85 patients were included in this study. An LHB tenodesis (LHB-TD) was performed in 49 patients and a tenotomy (LHB-TT) in 36 patients. In addition to a standardized examination, the age and gender adjusted Constant score (aCS), the LHB score and the subjective shoulder value (SSV) were assessed. The cosmetic result was evaluated by both patient and examiner. In all patients the elbow flexion and supination strength were measured and compared between sides and sonography of the affected shoulder was performed.

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant differences concerning age, body mass index (BMI) and requirements for shoulder function. The aCS and the LHB score showed good to excellent results without any significant differences between the groups and the SSV also did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups. In 34 patients of the LHB-TD group and 25 patients of the LHB-TT group a mild upper arm asymmetry could be detected (n. s.). Only three patients of the LHB-TD group and two patients of the LHB-TT group confirmed the presence of a subjective popeye deformity (n. s.). Both flexion and supination strength showed significantly better results for the LHB-TD group in comparison to the LHB-TT group. The LHB could not be sonographically detected in the bicipital groove in five patients of the LHB-TD group and in one patient of the LHB-TT group.

CONCLUSION

In patients preselected according to routinely used indication parameters (e.g. age, BMI and functional requirements of the shoulder) both LHB-TD and LHB-TT can achieve good to very good functional and cosmetic results with high patient satisfaction.

Elbow flexion and forearm supination strength in a healthy population

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Despite the lack of representative data of a healthy population, many clinical trials concerning the measurement of postoperative elbow flexion or forearm supination strength use the contralateral side as a control. We hypothesized that there are no differences in elbow flexion and supination strength between the dominant and nondominant sides in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

The study was performed on a cross-sectional cohort of healthy subjects without any prior injuries or surgical interventions of the upper extremities. Isometric elbow flexion strength and supination strength were measured on both the dominant and nondominant sides. The results were analyzed for the entire group and subanalyzed for female vs. male, for different age groups, and according to handedness and regular practice of overhead sports.

RESULTS

A total of 150 subjects (75 female and 75 male subjects; mean age, 44 ± 15 years [range, 18-72 years]) were included in this study. Within the entire collective, no significant differences concerning the elbow flexion strength between the dominant and nondominant sides could be detected, whereas the supination strength was 7% higher on the dominant side (P = .010). Women, right-hand-dominant subjects, and subjects who do not regularly practice overhead sports have a significant 8% higher supination strength on the dominant side compared with the nondominant side (P < .05). Left-hand-dominant subjects have an 8% higher elbow flexion strength on the nondominant right side (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Elbow flexion strength and forearm supination strength differ between the dominant and nondominant sides. The contralateral upper extremity cannot be used as a matched control without some adjustments.

Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis using a suture plate: clinical results after 2 years

PURPOSE

Several techniques for performing a tenodesis of the long head of biceps (LHB) are described. Only few outcome studies are published. This note describes a unicortical fixation via a suture plate-comparable to a distal biceps refixation-performed arthroscopically or mini-open via standard suprapectoral approach. The aim of this study is to show the clinical outcome after 6, 12, and 24 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 50 (35 male, 15 female) patients at the mean age of 49 years (range 23-75) who underwent tenodesis of the LHB were followed for 2 years. All patients were operated by a single surgeon (CS). The clinical evaluation included Constant score, Scheibel LHB score and VAS. Structural integrity of the tenodesis was checked by ultrasound control. Integrity of the tenodesis was evaluated indirectly by detecting the LHB-tendon up to the ultrasound-reflex of the button. No tendon at the button-reflex was considered as failure of the tenodesis. An independent examiner who was not the operating surgeon performed all evaluations. (MG evaluated the patients operated by CS).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 29.5 (range 22-32) months. The mean pre-operative Constant Murley score (CMS) was 67.4 points (range 45-78) and increased to 84.7 points (range 51-99) after 2 years. LHB Score was 90.8 after 24 months. We identified 2 failed biceps fixations (4%). Pain relief was achieved in most patients within the first 12 weeks. After 2 years, the mean biceps flexion strength averaged 84% of the healthy arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Tenodesis of the LHB with a unicortical suture plate is a safe fixation technique with good-to-excellent clinical results after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Long-term follow-up is needed.