Ultrasound is as reliable as plain radiographs in the diagnosis of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement

Association of Chondrolabral Lesions with Ultrasound-Guided Detection of Pathological Head-Neck Contour

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether the asphericity of the neck-head junction of the femur confirmed via ultrasound is associated with further pathology due to femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI).

METHODOLOGY

After a clinical examination with positive FAI tests, an ultrasound examination of the hip was performed. In the case of asphericity, a quantitative ultrasound-assisted assessment of the hip was performed, followed by contrast-enhanced arthro-MRI with the question of cartilage or labral damage.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We included 51 patients with a mean age of 35.25. According to the examination algorithm, asphericity was present in all patients via ultrasonography. The average anterior alpha angle (AAA) determined in ultrasonography was 43.49°. The average AAA on the arthro-MRI was 44.19°. The mean anterior head neck offset (AHNO) in ultrasound was 5.27 mm, and in arthro-MRI, it was 5.36 mm. Arthro-MRI confirmed a bump in 47 patients and a talization disorder in 4 patients. In 49 patients, a labral lesion was found, with one being a re-rupture. Furthermore, in one patient, labral degeneration was identified. Cartilage damage to the hip joint was found in 25 patients. Two patients had neither labral nor cartilage damage in the arthro-MRI. In our study, sonographically confirmed asphericity of the head-neck junction was found in 49 cases, which was associated with further pathology and, according to the current doctrine, was attributable to the FAI and required surgical intervention. This study shows that the detection of a pathologic head and neck contour via ultrasound in combination with positive clinical signs, as present in FAI, is associated with chondrolabral lesions detected via arthro-MRI in 96.1% of cases.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Hip Pain: 2022 Update

Chronic hip pain is a frequent chief complaint for adult patients who present for evaluation in a variety of clinical practice settings. Following a targeted history and physical examination, imaging plays a vital role in elucidating the etiologies of a patient's symptoms, as a wide spectrum of pathological entities may cause chronic hip pain. Radiography is usually the appropriate initial imaging test following a clinical examination. Depending on the clinical picture, advanced cross-sectional imaging may be subsequently performed for further evaluation. This documents provides best practice for the imaging workup of chronic hip pain in patients presenting with a variety of clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Sonography-Based Determination of Hip Joint Anterior Alpha-Angle: A Reliable and Reproducible Method

PURPOSE

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a known risk factor for hip osteoarthritis. The gold standard for diagnostics is X-ray and MRI. The accuracy of hip joint alpha angle measurements obtained using sonography is equal to measurements in MRI for patients with cam impingement of the hip joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with hip pain and MRI and sonography were evaluated between January 2015 and December 2019 in a single center. Musculoskeletal sonography was performed according to the DEGUM guidelines by ultrasound-certified specialists. Measurements were repeated three times by two independent investigators.

RESULTS

285 patients were screened, and 110 patients (49 females, 61 males) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at time of investigation of 54 left and 56 right hip joints was 54.2 years. 1320 measurements were performed. The mean alpha angle was 50.7° in MRI and 50.4° in sonography with a mean difference of 0.28° (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Determining hip alpha angle using sonography is a safe and reproducible method. No statistically significant differences between results in MRI and sonography could be seen. Although this is a retrospective, single-center study including only Caucasian mid-Europeans and with the known limitations of ultrasound imaging, it nevertheless shows that sonography can be used as a simple, cheap, and fast technique to assess the hip alpha angle without losing diagnostic quality.

EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM Dynamic Ultrasound Protocols for (Adult) Hip

ABSTRACT

In this dynamic scanning protocol, ultrasound assessment of the adult hip is described using different maneuvers for various conditions. Real-time patient examination and ultrasound scanning videos are coupled for convenience as well as for better insight. The text covers the common conditions around the hip where especially dynamic ultrasound scanning provides valuable information in addition to static imaging. The protocol is prepared by an international consensus of several experts in the field of musculoskeletal ultrasound.

The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound - Part II: Joint Pathologies, Pediatric Applications, and Guided Procedures

The second part of the Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (MSUS), produced under the auspices of EFSUMB, following the same methodology as for Part 1, provides information and recommendations on the use of this imaging modality for joint pathology, pediatric applications, and musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided procedures. Clinical application, practical points, limitations, and artifacts are described and discussed for every joint or procedure. The document is intended to guide clinical users in their daily practice.

The Role of Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: History, Current Practices, and Future Applications

»

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is one of the most common causes of early hip articular cartilage wear and labral damage, and subsequently leads to the onset of hip osteoarthritis.

»

Cam-type FAI impingement lesions can be best identified with a 90° Dunn lateral radiograph and a cross-table lateral radiograph with 15° of internal rotation; the alpha angle and the femoral head-neck offset are the most used predictive radiographic markers.

»

FAI lesions with pincer impingement are associated with acetabular retroversion and are more difficult to identify on traditional radiographic imaging; however, the presence of a crossover sign, an ischial spine sign, and/or a posterior wall sign can be useful radiographic markers.

»

Advanced imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) can also be beneficial in the evaluation of FAI and labral pathology; MRA is more sensitive than MRI in detecting intra-articular pathology.

»

Computer-assisted navigation for preoperative planning and intraoperative surgical assistance are promising technologies; however, additional studies are needed before they can be utilized safely and effectively.

Sonographic evaluation of anterior inferior iliac spine morphology demonstrates excellent accuracy when compared to false profile view

PURPOSE

To compare ultrasound examination to false profile radiographs in identification and classification of AIIS morphology. The study hypothesis stated that sonographic imaging of the AIIS correlates well to AIIS morphology seen on false profile radiographs.

METHODS

Fifty-three hips in 30 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. A single, fellowship trained, orthopedic surgeon performed an ultrasound on all of the patients to evaluate the AIIS morphology. The patients underwent standing false profile radiographs. The US and radiographic images were independently reviewed and classified according to Hetsroni classification of AIIS morphology by two senior, fellowship trained, orthopedic surgeons. Agreement between the two raters was calculated for each imaging modality (inter-rater agreement) as well as the agreement between the rating in each modality by the same rater ("inter-method" agreement).

RESULTS

 The agreement between the raters (inter-rater agreement) for morphologic evaluation of the AIIS by means of FP view was 88.8% (p < 0.001) and that by means of US was 81.5%(p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of the US compared to the FP view was 92.3% (48/52) for both rater 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

 This study showed near-perfect agreement in analyzing the morphology of the AIIS in a group of patients with hip pathology. Office sonographic evaluation of the AIIS is reliable and, therefore, may be routinely utilized in the clinic setting avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure to the patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Editorial Commentary: Ultrasound-Guided Injection With Dynamic Assessment Could Improve Outcomes in Atypical and Revision Hip Arthroscopy Patients: But Today, Few Are Trained to Hear at Such High Frequencies

Imaging modalities for hip disorders all have their strengths and weaknesses. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior for evaluating soft tissue pathology, computerized tomography best characterizes osseous morphology, and plain radiographs can accurately depict 2-dimensional anatomy and are familiar to most clinicians. Ultrasound-guided injections have become commonplace in the musculoskeletal arena. Ultrasound evaluation of musculoskeletal anatomy has received increased attention, has the ability to image soft tissue and osseous structures, and more importantly, has the ability to dynamically evaluate these structures in real time. A noninvasive dynamic assessment of the hip region could be an absolute game changer for the hip preservation/sports medicine community in the diagnosis of atypical hip pain, femoroacetabular impingement, and labral tears. Widespread ability and expertise to perform these dynamic ultrasound assessments, however, is not in place at this time. We need more training and studies to best harness the potential benefits of these sound waves.

Ultrasound and Ultrasound-Guided Hip Injection Have High Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Femoroacetabular Impingement With Atypical Symptoms

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasound and ultrasound-guided hip injection in the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with atypical symptoms.

METHODS

We evaluated consecutive patients diagnosed with FAI and with atypical symptoms who underwent ultrasound-guided hip injection between January 2017 and February 2019. All patients underwent systematic physical examination, ultrasound examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination, and ultrasound-guided injection before surgery. Patients with positive response to ultrasound-guided hip injection were recommended to undergo arthroscopic surgery to treat intra-articular pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) of ultrasound and MRI were calculated by using arthroscopic surgery as the gold standard. The accuracy of ultrasound-guided hip injection was recorded. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes included visual analog scale for pain and modified Harris Hip Score.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients with atypical symptoms were diagnosed with FAI. Among these 78 patients, 50 patients had positive responses to injection and 28 patients had negative responses to injection. A total of 36 patients finally underwent arthroscopic surgery. Response to the ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection was 91.7% accurate for detecting the presence of intra-articular abnormality. There were no complications of injection in any of the patients. The sensitivity, PPV, and accuracy by ultrasound diagnosis of cam impingement were 82.9%, 96.7%, and 80.6%, respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy by ultrasound diagnosis of anterosuperior labral tear were both 72.2%. For MRI diagnosis of cam impingement, the sensitivity, PPV and accuracy were 72.2%, 96.3%, and 74.3%, respectively. For MRI diagnosis of labral tear, the sensitivity and accuracy were both 88.9%. Thirty-four patients (94.4%) surpassed the minimal clinically important difference, and 33 patients (91.7%) achieved the patient acceptable symptomatic state.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound and ultrasound-guided hip injection have high accuracy in the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement with atypical symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

Current advances and research in ultrasound imaging to the assessment and management of musculoskeletal disorders

Currently evidence-based practice has given scientific weight to the physical therapist profession; it is essential that all medical professional and physical therapists know the usefulness of new tools that optimize the effectiveness of their interventions and allow the growing of the scientific knowledge base. The use of ultrasound imaging (USI) by physiotherapists has evolved in recent years, consolidating as an increasingly standardized technique, low cost compared to other imaging techniques, quickly of execution, feasible and reliable tool. USI offers a wide range of opportunities in clinical practice as well as in different research areas. Therefore, ultrasound has been currently used as a diagnostic tool by physicians and in recent years there has been an expansion of the use of ultrasound equipment by non-physicians professionals such as physical therapist or physical trainers, who incorporates USI as a means of assessing musculoskeletal system architecture and composition, musculoskeletal changes in dysfunction, pain or injury conditions, as an interventional technique assisting echo-guided procedures or using the visual real-time information as a biofeedback in control motor approaches, as guiding tool in clinical decisions as well as to improve the understanding of tissue adaptations to exercise or movement. The purpose of this article is to review and provide an overview about the currently research of the USI applications and their benefits for the diagnosis and management in individuals with musculoskeletal conditions.

The Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound in Anterosuperior Acetabular Labral Tear

PURPOSE

To investigate diagnostic value of ultrasound in acetabular labral tears compared with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, using arthroscopic surgery as the gold standard in a relatively large sample size.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who attended the sports medicine clinic of our department and underwent arthroscopic surgery for the diagnosis of an anterosuperior acetabular labral tear between June 2014 and April 2018. All the patients received hip joint ultrasound examination and MR imaging evaluation before arthroscopic surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ultrasound and MR imaging were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 184 had arthroscopically confirmed anterosuperior acetabular labral tear. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and accuracy by ultrasound were, respectively, 68.5%, 81.8%, 98 4%, 13.4%, and 69.2%, retrospectively. For MR imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 84.8%, 63.6%, 97.5%, 20.0%, and 83.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ultrasound had a slightly lower sensitivity for detecting anterosuperior acetabular labral tear, it had a higher specificity and PPV than MR imaging. With the advantages of being inexpensive, relatively quick, noninvasive, and having dynamic evaluation, ultrasound could be used as a feasible method to evaluate anterosuperior acetabular labral tear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Ultrasound Findings in Patients With Femoracetabular Impingement Without Radiographic Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess ultrasound (US) abnormalities in patients with clinical and radiographic features of femoracetabular impingement (FAI) without radiologic osteoarthritis.

METHODS

This study included patients aged 50 years or younger with hip pain and clinical and radiographic signs suggestive of FAI but without radiographic hip osteoarthritis. Demographic characteristics, the symptom duration, and the radiologic type of FAI were recorded. Ultrasound examinations assessed for anterior labral abnormalities, osteophytes, bone cortex irregularities, capsular distension, and acetabulofemoral and femoral head-to-neck distances. A balanced group of healthy volunteers was used as control participants.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients with FAI were evaluated. Ultrasound changes were found in 93.2% of patients, with 63.6% showing some kind of labral abnormality, 40.9% showing articular cartilage abnormalities, 38.6% showing bone contour irregularities, and 29.5% showing osteophytes. The cartilage width and symptom duration were inferior in patients with a damaged articular surface compared with those without (P = .005 and .012, respectively). Patients showing osteophytes on US examinations were slightly older (P = .048). Patients with cam-type FAI were more frequently male (P = .0001) and younger (P = .022) compared with those who had pincer-type FAI and also had a shorter symptom duration (P < .05). Patients with symptoms for 2 years or less had a shorter femoral cartilage width (P = .027). Femoral head-to-neck distances were shorter in patients compared with controls (P = .0005). Only 1 patient in the control group showed some US abnormality.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound showed detected abnormalities in a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic FAI in early phases of the disease. Additional longitudinal studies are warranted to establish the prognostic importance of these US changes.© 2018 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Assessment of cam morphology of the hip with ultra sound imaging by physical therapists is reliable and valid

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is considered present when a combination of clinical symptoms, signs and morphological features of the hip co-exist. Imaging is increasingly popular in primary health care settings with physical therapists performing ultrasound (US).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound in determining presence of cam morphology.

DESIGN

A concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability study.

METHODS

The presence of cam morphology of the hip was determined by α angle measures using Kinovea software. A cam was defined present when the α angle >60°. The index test was US and radiographs served as a gold standard.

RESULTS

Correlation between the radiographic α angle and ultrasound measures was r = 0.82 (p < 0.01). Inter-rater reliability was high with an ICC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.61-0.84). The predictive value for presence of cam morphology had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 94%. The positive predictive value was 79% whereas the negative predictive value was 94%. Total accuracy was 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound conducted by trained physical therapists is a valid, reliable, specific and sensitive diagnostic tool to assess the presence of cam morphology.