Unicondylar vs. total knee arthroplasty in medial osteoarthritis: a retrospective analysis of registry data and functional outcome

Comparing Complication Rates, Costs, and Length of Stay between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Insights from a Big Data Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample Dataset

Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is increasingly used for knee osteoarthritis due to faster recovery, better range of motion, and lower costs compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While TKA may offer longer-lasting results with lower revision rates, this study compares the relative benefits and limitations of UKA and TKA using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Methods: This retrospective analysis examined outcomes of elective UKA and TKA procedures from 2016 to 2019, identifying 2,606,925 patients via ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching based on demographics, hospital characteristics, and comorbidities resulted in a balanced cohort of 136,890 patients. The present study compared in-hospital mortality, length of stay, postoperative complications, and hospitalization costs. Results: The results showed that UKA procedures increased significantly over the study period. Patients undergoing UKA were generally younger with fewer comorbidities. After matching, both groups had low in-hospital mortality (0.015%). UKA patients had shorter hospital stays (1.53 vs. 2.47 days) and lower costs (USD 55,976 vs. USD 61,513) compared to TKA patients. UKA patients had slightly higher rates of intraoperative fracture and pulmonary edema, while TKA patients had higher risks of blood transfusion, anemia, coronary artery disease, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury. Conclusions: UKA appears to be a less-invasive, cost-effective option for younger patients with localized knee osteoarthritis.

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data.

METHODS

Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs.

RESULTS

One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

Advantages of Simultaneous Cementless Bilateral Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Staged Surgery

Background

Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective procedure, which reduces pain, increases range of motion, and improves function. UKA could be performed simultaneously or in staged sessions. This study aimed to compare bilateral cementless UKA performed simultaneously and in staged sessions in terms of complications, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, and functional outcomes.

Methods

Patients undergoing bilateral UKA for symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 73 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 40 underwent surgery simultaneously and 33 underwent surgery in separate sessions. Operative time, length of hospital stay, change in hemoglobin, need for blood transfusion, complications, and functional outcomes were assessed.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in demographic data. Simultaneously operated patients had a significantly shorter hospital stay and shorter operative time. Statistically significant improvements in clinical scores were noted in both groups. The degree of improvement in functional scores did not differ between the groups. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of complication rates, but the number of periprosthetic tibial fractures was higher in the simultaneous group.

Conclusions

Simultaneous bilateral cementless UKA was more advantageous in terms of cumulative hospital stay and total operation time with similar clinical results when compared to a staged procedure. While the overall complication rate was similar, the rate of periprosthetic fractures was 5% in the simultaneous group.

Effects of Surgeon Handedness on the Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Single Center's Experience

OBJECTIVE

Surgeon handedness has been widely discussed in operative surgery, and could cause clinical discrepancy. However, few studies have reported the effect of handedness on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Based on our clinical observation and case analysis, we aimed to find out the effects of surgeon handedness on UKA.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 94 UKA procedures performed by one right-handed surgeon from January 2017 to December 2018 at a single medical center. The cases were divided into two groups by operation side (49 L-UKAs and 45 R-UKAs). Preoperative demographic data were collected. Imaging parameters (femorotibial and hip-knee-ankle angles and tibial-plateau retroversion) and joint function scores (Knee Society Score [KSS] and Oxford Knee Score [OKS]) were recorded. Patients were followed up regularly and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) was calculated at the last follow-up. All data were compared between the two groups with independent-samples t-test, and paired t-test was used for intragroup comparisons.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 26.7 ± 3.2 months. The average patient age was 63.5 ± 9.0 years and the average body mass index was 26.89 ± 3.43 kg/m² . There was no significant group difference in any preoperative characteristic. Both the KSS and OKS improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.05). No significant group difference was found between the KSS or OKS at any follow-up visit. The varus or valgus of tibial component was 3.57 ± 1.42° on the left side and 3.19 ± 1.56° on the right side (p = 0.45). The varus or valgus of femoral component was 7.81 ± 2.43° in patients undergoing L-UKA and 7.05 ± 2.90° in those undergoing R-UKA (p = 0.04). No statistical differences were found in outliers of component orientation on both sides. The femorotibial and hip-knee-ankle angles improved significantly in both groups, and there was no significant group difference in either lower limb alignment or tibial-plateau retroversion. The complication rate was 8.16% (4/49) in the L-UKA group and 6.67% (3/45) in the R-UKA group. There was no correlation between prosthesis orientation and early joint function score.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon handedness may cause a worse prosthetic orientation on femoral side during surgeon's non-dominant UKA, and surgeons should be cautious of bone resection and prosthesis implantation. However, radiographic difference did not bring variations on short-term clinical outcomes or lower limb alignment.

Intraoperative rotational kinematics and its influence on postoperative clinical outcomes differ according to age in Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty

Background

Although Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is used in patients of wide age ranges, there is no clear information regarding the age differences in terms of intraoperative femorotibial rotational kinematics and its influence on clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study was conducted to examine the age differences in terms of intraoperative rotational kinematics and postoperative clinical outcomes and to analyze their relationship with classification according to the age group.

Methods

We investigated 111 knees of patients who underwent Oxford UKA using a navigation system and divided them into two groups: elderly (aged ≥75 years; 48 knees) and nonelderly (aged < 75 years; 63 knees). Intraoperative tibial internal rotational angles relative to the femur during passive knee flexion were measured using a navigation system, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using knee range of motion, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Knee Society Functional Score at 2 years postoperatively. The relationships between intraoperative tibiofemoral rotational angles and clinical outcomes were also evaluated in the two groups.

Results

The intraoperative tibial internal rotational angle relative to the femur during knee flexion was significantly larger in the nonelderly group (13.5°) than in the elderly group (9.0°). The intraoperative tibial internal rotational angle showed a positive correlation with the pain subscale of KOOS only in the nonelderly group.

Conclusion

Intraoperative rotational kinematics and its influence on clinical outcomes were different between elderly and nonelderly patients, and the tibial internal rotational angle could be a more important factor for successful UKA in nonelderly patients.

Better short-term function after unicompartmental compared to total knee arthroplasty

Background

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an established treatment option for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA). However, strict patient selection is crucial for its success. The proposed advantages include nearly natural knee kinematics, faster rehabilitation and better functional outcomes. Despite the aforementioned facts and it’s proven cost-effectiveness, there are still hesitations for the use of UKA as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Key objectives of this study were therefore to assess clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) as well as patient’s satisfaction after medial UKA in comparison to TKA.

Methods

To assess the outcome after UKA we conducted a prospective multi-center study. 116 patients with unicompartmental OA and indication for UKA were included. Overall 54 females and 62 males with an average age of 62.7 years (±9.8) and an average body mass index (BMI) of 29.2 (± 3.7) were recruited. Clinical results and PRO were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Follow-ups took place 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery including clinical examination, radiographs, assessment of PRO and adverse events. Pain and satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 (worst) to 10 (best)).

For comparison with TKA a propensity score matched-pair analysis was performed to eliminate confounders. Matching criteria were gender, patient’s age, BMI and comorbidities. A total of 116 matched-pairs were analysed.

Results

There was no revision in the UKA group until 2 years after surgery. Revision rates were higher in the TKA group (0.6%).

Preoperative KSS-Scores were higher within the UKA cohort (p <  0.001). After surgical treatment, PROMs displayed a significant improvement (p <  0,001) in both cohorts. Regarding the Knee-Score (Pain, Alignment, ROM) we observed no differences between cohorts after 12 months. The Function-Score demonstrated significantly better results in the UKA cohort (UKA vs. TKA 95 vs 80, p <  0.001). Patient satisfaction was also higher in UKA patients (UKA vs TKA 9.0 vs 8.8, p = 0.019).

Conclusion

Patients of both cohorts showed high satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. UKA resulted in higher function scores compared to TKA without increased revision rate during short-term follow-up. Therefore, UKA is a good treatment option for unicompartmental OA.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04598568. Registered 22 October 2020 - Retrospectively registered.