Injury patterns following simple elbow dislocation: radiological analysis implies existence of a pure valgus dislocation mechanism

A Novel Surgical Treatment Management Algorithm for Elbow Posterolateral Rotatory Instability (PLRI) Based on the Common Extensor Origin Integrity

Background: Here, we introduce a comprehensive treatment algorithm for posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow, a condition affecting elbow mobility. We outline a diagnostic approach and a novel surgical management plan through the arthroscopic surgeon's point of view. Methods: The central focus of this management approach is the integrity of common extensor origin (CEO). High clinical suspicion must be evident to diagnose PLRI. Special clinical and imaging tests can confirm PLRI but sometimes the final confirmation is established during the arthroscopic treatment. The most appropriate treatment is determined by the degree of CEO integrity. Results: The treatment strategy varies with the CEO's condition: intact or minor tears require arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament imbrication, while extensive tears may need plication reinforced with imbrication or, in cases of retraction, a triceps tendon autograft reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament alongside CEO repair. These approaches aim to manage residual instability and are complemented using a tailored rehabilitation protocol to optimize functional outcomes. Conclusion: PLRI is a unique clinical condition and should be treated likewise. This algorithm offers valuable insights for diagnosing and treating PLRI, enhancing therapeutic decision-making.

Posterior Translation of the Radial Head in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lateral Epicondylitis

Background

Posterolateral rotatory instability is produced by disruption of the lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC); it is commonly induced by trauma, with few cases reported due to lateral epicondylitis. We examined the amount of posterior transition of the radial head with or without LCLC injury, common extensor tendon (CET) injury, and Baker classification in lateral epicondylitis.

Methods

We retrospectively studied patients with lateral epicondylitis of the humerus who underwent surgery between April 2016 and July 2021. Fifteen elbows with coronal and sagittal images on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. We investigated the amount of posterior transition of the radial head in sagittal MRI images of the elbow, which were compared based on LCLC and CET lesion.

Results

The mean age of patients was 49 years. The lesions in four, nine, and two patients were classified as LCLC0, LCLC1, and LCLC2, respectively. The mean radio-humeral distance values among the LCLC lesions were 0.65, 2.46, and 2.22 mm in LCLC0, LCLC1, and LCLC2, respectively, with the RHD between LCLC0 and LCLC1 differing significantly. In five, six, and four patients, the lesions were classified as CET1, CET2, and CET3, respectively. The mean RHD values among the CET lesions were 1.33, 2.68, and 1.48 mm in CET1, CET2, and CET3, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results showed that posterior transition of the radial head is greater in patients with lateral epicondylitis with LCLC lesions on MRI than those with normal findings of LCLC.

Variant of the terrible triad of the elbow, a CASE report with a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The terrible triad described by Hotchkiss in 1996 is a complex lesion of the elbow, following a trauma combining forced valgus and external rotation. It is a lesion that puts the elbow at risk of developing complications such as instability, stiffness, or synostosis of the proximal radio-cubital joint.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a patient who suffered a closed trauma to the right elbow following a fall onto the palm of the hand with a valgus lateral rotation mechanism. The lesion assessment showed a B2 fracture of the distal humerus (AO classification) with a line splitting the capitulum in the frontal plane, a type 3 coronoid process fracture (Morrey/Odriscoll classification), and a posterolateral elbow dislocation. The surgical treatment followed the same principles as for the terrible triad, with a reconstruction of the lateral column by osteosynthesis of the humeral palate, followed by an internal approach for osteosynthesis of the coronoid process, with the restoration of a stable elbow without laxity in the frontal plane.

DISCUSSION

On the basis of the lesion mechanism, column theory, and the schematization of the constituent elements of elbow stability in a ring, certain lesions can be placed in the same box as the terrible triad of the elbow, which also complies with the same therapeutic implications.

CONCLUSION

Our observation underlines the possibility of the existence of lesions other than those described by Hotchkiss, which would have the same consequences: an unstable elbow with the risk of evolving into chronic instability or stiffness and whose management accepts the same management.

Simple lateral elbow dislocation: A case report

BACKGROUND

Simple lateral elbow dislocation (SLED) is a rare type of elbow dislocation; however, its treatment may be complicated by accompanying soft tissue or neurovascular damage. Herein, we report a rare case of SLED managed secon-darily with open reduction and soft tissue repair following failure of closed reduction.

CASE SUMMARY

A 67-year-old woman suffered SLED after falling on her outstretched left hand with her elbow extended. She developed pain, swelling, and movement restriction in the elbow; there were no neurovascular symptoms, except for numbness in the 4^th and 5^th digits. Radiologic investigation confirmed the SLED, and a closed reduction under anesthesia was performed. The follow-up radiographs at 1-wk revealed failure of reduction; accordingly, open reduction with lateral collateral ligament and common extensor origin repair were carried out. The patient regained full elbow range of motion by six weeks.

CONCLUSION

Adequate concentric reduction for SLED, conservatively or surgically, reduces complications and provides a more functional joint.

Dual Bracing for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries Restores Native Valgus Laxity and Native Medial Joint Gapping of the Elbow

Background

Despite growing evidence on the role of the posterior ulnar collateral ligament (pUCL) in elbow stability, current ligament bracing techniques are mainly focused on the anterior ulnar collateral ligament (aUCL). A dual-bracing technique combines the repair of the pUCL and aUCL with a suture augmentation of both bundles.

Purpose

To biomechanically assess a dual-bracing approach addressing aUCL and pUCL for humeral-sided complete UCL lesions to restore medial elbow laxity without overconstraining.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 21 unpaired human elbows (11 right, 10 left; 57.19 ± 11.7 years) were randomized into 3 groups to compare dual bracing with aUCL suture augmentation and aUCL graft reconstruction. Laxity testing was performed with 25 N applied 12 cm distal to the elbow joint for 30 seconds at randomized flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°) for the native condition and then for each surgical technique. A calibrated motion capture system was used for assessment, allowing the 3-dimensional displacement during the complete valgus stress cycle between the optical trackers to be quantified as joint gap and laxity. The repaired constructs were then cyclically tested through a materials testing machine starting with 20 N for 200 cycles at a rate of 0.5 Hz. The load was increased stepwise by 10 N for 200 cycles until displacement reached 5.0 mm or complete failure occurred.

Results

Dual bracing and aUCL bracing resulted in significantly (P = .045) less joint gapping at 120° of flexion compared with aUCL reconstruction. No significant differences in valgus laxity were found among the surgical techniques. Within each technique, there were no significant differences between the native and the postoperative state in valgus laxity and joint gapping. No significant differences between the techniques were observed in cycles to failure and failure load.

Conclusion

Dual bracing restored native valgus joint laxity and medial joint gapping without overconstraining and provided similar primary stability regarding failure outcomes as established techniques. Furthermore, it was able to restore joint gapping in 120° of flexion significantly better than aUCL reconstruction.

Clinical Relevance

This study provides biomechanical data on the dual-bracing approach that may help surgeons to consider this new method of addressing acute humeral UCL lesions.

Acute and Chronic Elbow Disorders

Elbow pain is very common and can be due to many pathologic conditions. After radiographs are obtained, advanced imaging is often necessary. Both ultrasonography and MR imaging can be used to evaluate the many important soft-tissue structures of the elbow, with each modality having advantages and disadvantages in certain clinical scenarios. Imaging findings between the two modalities often correlate. It is important for musculoskeletal radiologists to understand normal elbow anatomy and how best to use ultrasonography and MR imaging to evaluate elbow pain. In this way, radiologists can provide expert guidance to referring clinicians and best guide patient management.

[Augmented primary sutures "internal bracing" following ligamentous elbow dislocation]

OBJECTIVE

Aim of surgical treatment is the primary stabilization of the unstable elbow following a ligamentous elbow dislocation.

INDICATIONS

Ligamentous elbow dislocations are typically accompanied by injuries to the surrounding musculature and collateral ligaments of the elbow joint. Surgical treatment is indicated in case of failure of nonoperative therapy, i.e., when a dislocation can only be prevented in immobilization > 90° and pronation of the elbow or an active muscular centering of the elbow fails after 5-7 days.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Contraindications for a solely "internal bracing" augmented primary suture are generally in the case of accompanying bony injuries in elbow dislocations, extensive soft-tissue injuries, and septic arthritis of the elbow.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The augmented primary suture of the elbow is performed using both a lateral (Kocher or Kaplan) and medial (FCU split) approach to the elbow. After reduction of the elbow, the collateral ligaments are first augmented with high-strength polyethylene suture and fixed in the distal humerus together with another high-strength polyethylene augmentation suture. The extensors and flexors are then fixed to the medial and lateral epicondyle, respectively, using suture anchors.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

The aim of the postoperative management is early functional exercise of the elbow. The elbow is placed in an elbow brace to avoid varus and valgus load.

RESULTS

Between August 2018 and January 2020, a total of 12 patients were treated with an augmented primary suture following unstable ligamentous elbow dislocation. After a mean follow-up of 14 ± 12.7 months, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 98.5 points with a mean functional arc of 115°. None of the patients reported a recurrent dislocation or persistent instability of the elbow.

Combined simple elbow dislocation and forearm joint injuries. A systematic review of the literature with injury patterns and current treatment rationale

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have allowed a great improvement in understanding elbow and forearm traumatic injuries. Simple elbow dislocations combined with forearm injuries have been occasionally reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to detect the possible patterns of simple elbow dislocations and forearm fracture-dislocations, providing a classification scheme to guide surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed search was performed to find combination of simple elbow dislocation and forearm joint injury, between 2000 and 2020, including clinical studies and case report. All articles related to pediatric patient or with complex elbow dislocation were excluded. After identification, articles were analyzed for the description of injury patterns reported according to locker-based classification system of forearm joint injuries.

RESULTS

Finally, 15 articles were included. Most of the patients sustained high-energy trauma. According to locker-based classification system, simple elbow dislocation was combined with: MRUJ and DRUJ Galeazzi injury (2IR.3), PRUJ and MRUJ injury (1.2I), PRUJ and MRUJ injury with radial shaft fracture (1.2IR), PRUJ and MRUJ injury with ulnar shaft fracture (1.2 IU), PRUJ and MRUJ injury with radial and ulnar shaft fracture (1.2IRU), PRUJ MRUJ DRUJ Essex-Lopresti injury (1.2I.3), and PRUJ MRUJ DRUJ injury with radial shaft fracture (1.2IR.3). Thirteen out of 15 patients undergo surgical treatment. Clinical results were overall favorable.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple elbow dislocation combined with forearm joint injury is an uncommon traumatic pattern usually secondary to high-energy trauma. A thorough knowledge of elbow and forearm biomechanics, and classification of anatomical lesion is mandatory for a successful treatment.