Risk factors and preventive strategy for excessive coronal inclination of tibial plateau following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Preoperative Joint Line Convergence Angle as an Indicator of Clinical Outcomes and Accuracy of Alignment Correction After Double-Level Osteotomy

Background

The relationship between postoperative alignment and clinical outcomes after double-level osteotomy (DLO) has not been clarified.

Purpose

To examine the radiological and clinical outcomes after DLO and specifically evaluate the influence of the joint-line convergence angle (JLCA) on the accuracy of alignment correction and surgical outcomes.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were 74 knees in 51 patients (mean age, 61.0 years) who underwent DLO for varus osteoarthritic knees and who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The target hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) for the intended limb alignment was set to 1° valgus. The lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, JLCA, and HKAA were measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Outliers in alignment correction were defined as a deviation of ≥3° from the originally intended HKAA. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). In the data analysis, the influence of the radiological parameters on the postoperative outcomes was statistically assessed.

Results

Radiological and clinical evaluation at 2-year follow-up showed significant improvement from preoperative values (P < .001). The HKAA was corrected from 13.4°± 3.0° varus preoperatively to 0.5°± 2.8° varus at 2 years, indicating a slight undercorrection. Regarding clinical outcomes, significant pre- to postoperative improvement was found on the KOOS (from 185.0 ± 71.2 to 387.9 ± 70.5; P < .001). Overall, 22 of the 74 knees (29.7%) were deemed to be outliers at the 2-year follow-up (19 knees [25.7%] in undercorrection, 3 knees [4.1%] in overcorrection). Postoperative KOOS values were significantly worse in the outliers than in the nonoutliers (344.4 ± 77.7 vs 405.8 ± 59.3; P < .001), and both pre- and postoperative JLCA was significantly larger in the outlier group. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated a preoperative cutoff JLCA of 6.0° for predicting postoperative alignment outliers.

Conclusion

A preoperative JLCA of ≥6° was found to be a significant prognostic factor affecting the radiological and clinical outcomes after DLO for varus osteoarthritic knees by compromising the accuracy of deformity correction, resulting in suboptimal postoperative alignment.

Joint-line obliquity angle is significantly affected by hip abduction and adduction: A simulated analysis

PURPOSE

Different methods for quantifying joint-line obliquity (JLO) have been described, including joint-line obliquity angle (JLOA), Mikulicz joint-line angle (MJLA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). The goal of the present study was to quantify the variation of JLOA based on the position of the hip. The hypothesis of our study is that JLO is significantly influenced by the abduction/adduction of the limb, unlike MJLA.

METHODS

One hundred long-leg-weightbearing X-rays were used. At time 0 and after 30 days, two observers performed different measurements, including (1) distance between pubic symphysis and center of the femoral head, (2) distance between center of the femoral head and center of the ankle joint, (3) distance between center of the ankle and medial malleolus, (4) hip-knee-ankle angle, (5) MPTA, (6) lateral distal femoral angle, (7) joint-line congruency angle, (8) JLOA, (9) MJL and (10) angle between Mikulicz line and line perpendicular to the ground. The changes of the JLOA based on the position of the hip (abducted, neutral, bipedal stance adduction and monopodal stance adduction) were calculated with trigonometric formulas and with simulation on an orthopaedic planning digital software.

RESULTS

The JLOA change between adducted and abducted positions was on average 12.8° (SD 0.9 mm). The MJL did not vary significantly based on hip position.

CONCLUSIONS

The adduction/abduction of the lower limb has a considerable impact on JLOA. Methods like MJLA which are not affected by hip position should be preferred for JLO evaluation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, level III.

No clinical outcome difference between varus phenotypes after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy at 2 years follow-up

PURPOSE

Clinical studies regarding medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) often analyse a large group of mechanical varus knees rather than differentiating for its primary varus-inducing component. This study aims to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of the most prevalent varus malalignment phenotypes using the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification.

METHODS

MOWHTO cases with minimal 2-year clinical follow-up were retrospectively selected from a knee osteotomy database (2016-2020). Based on the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), subjects were allocated to the correct CPAK phenotype pre- and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were the numeric rating scale (NRS), the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and the therapeutic response rate (TRR) at 2-year follow-up. Inter-observer correlation coefficient (ICC) and unpaired student t test were performed for cross-phenotype comparison.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five (135) subjects were found eligible (53.0 years old ±9.6 [19-77], 72% male, 53% left-sided). The most prevalent preoperative phenotype was CPAK 1 (n = 70 (52%)) and the postoperative phenotype was CPAK 6 (n = 66 (49%)). All CPAK phenotypes improved significantly relative to baseline but cross-phenotype comparison yielded no significant differences in clinical outcome. The TRR at 2 years was 67% for CPAK 1, 69% for CPAK 2 and 87% for CPAK 4. The TRR for CPAK 6 was 64% compared with 80% for CPAK 9, which was not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

At 2-year follow-up, no clinically significant differences are observed between different CPAK phenotypes. Accurate MOWHTO corrections provide significant clinical improvement even in the femoral-driven varus knee and the constitutional varus knee dominated by intra-articular wear. The clinical indication for MOWHTO performance should not be reduced to the medial arthritic varus knee with underlying tibial varus alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective comparative study.

Development of a machine learning model for identifying the optimal situation favoring double-level osteotomy over single-level high tibial osteotomy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to identify the optimal situation wherein double-level osteotomy (DLO) is favored for severe varus knees by analyzing unfavorable outcomes. This study hypothesized that there are the most favorable algorithms and contributing factors for identifying the optimal situation favoring DLO over opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO).

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent OWHTO (505 knees). Unfavorable outcome parameters were defined as follows: (1) medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) > 95°, (2) joint line convergence angle (JLCA) > 4° (insufficient medial release), (3) JLCA < 0° (medial instability), (4) recurrence of varus deformity, and (5) lateral hinge fracture. The input data for the ML model included demographic data and preoperative radiological and intra-operative factors. The ML model was used to evaluate overall and to evaluate each unfavorable outcome. Interpretation by the model was performed by SHapley Additive exPlanations.

RESULTS

The unfavorable group had a larger JLCA and MPTA preoperatively than the favorable group in the conventional comparison. The light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.66 and F-1 score of 0.72 among the ML algorithms. In the overall assessment, the preoperative weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR) was the factor that contributed the most, followed by the preoperative JLCA and the ΔWBLR. ΔWBLR and the preoperative JLCA were the contributing factors for each outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The LGBM model was superior in predicting the optimal situations favoring DLO over OWHTO. Preoperative WBLR, preoperative JLCA, and ΔWBLR significantly contributed to the unfavorable outcomes overall and for each outcome in the ML model.

Joint line obliquity after lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy does not adversely affect clinical and radiological outcome: a 5-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

To analyze the association between change in knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) and patient-reported outcome, radiological progression of osteoarthritis, and surgical survival after lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

METHODS

A cohort of 180 patients treated in one single hospital with lateral closing-wedge HTO was examined. KJLO was defined by the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). To assess the association between KJLO and patient-reported outcome, radiological progression of osteoarthritis, and surgical survival, patient groups were defined: I, postoperative MPTA < 95.0°; II, postoperative MPTA ≥ 95.0°; A, MPTA change < 8.0°; B, MPTA change ≥ 8.0°. Propensity score matching was used for between-groups (I and II, A and B) covariates matching, including age, gender, preoperative lower limb alignment, preoperative medial joint space width (mJSW), preoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, wedge size, and postoperative follow-up time. Patient-reported outcome was assessed by the WOMAC questionnaire, radiological progression of osteoarthritis by mJSW and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade progression (≥ 1) preoperatively and at follow-ups (> 2 years). Failure was defined as revision HTO or conversion to knee arthroplasty.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, groups I and II contained 58 pairs of patients and groups A and B contained 50 pairs. There were no significant differences in postoperative WOMAC score or surgical failure rate between groups I and II or between groups A and B (p > 0.05). However, the postoperative mJSW was significantly lower in group I than group II (3.2 ± 1.6 mm vs 3.9 ± 1.8 mm; p = 0.018) and in group A than group B (3.0 ± 1.7 mm vs 3.7 ± 1.5 mm; p = 0.040). KL grade progression rate was significantly higher in group I than group II (53.4% vs 29.3%; p = 0.008) and in group A than group B (56.0% vs 28.0%; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Increased KJLO (postoperative MPTA ≥ 95.0°) or MPTA change ≥ 8.0° after lateral closing-wedge HTO does not adversely affect patient-reported outcome, radiological progression of osteoarthritis, or surgical survival at an average 5-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Clinical relevance of joint line obliquity after high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis remains controversial: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature on the association between knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) and clinical outcome after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial knee osteoarthritis and summarize the KJLO cut-off value used when studying this association.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) on September 2022, updated on February 2023. Eligible studies describing postoperative KJLO in relation to clinical outcome after HTO for medial knee osteoarthritis were included. Nonpatient studies and conference abstracts without full-text were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed title, abstract and full-text based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The modified Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of each included study.

RESULTS

Of the seventeen studies included, three had good methodological quality, thirteen fair quality, and one had poor quality. Conflicting findings were shown on the associations between postoperative KJLO and patient-reported outcome, medial knee cartilage regeneration, and 10-year surgical survival in sixteen studies. Three good-quality studies found no significant differences in lateral knee cartilage degeneration between postoperative medial proximal tibial angle > 95° and < 95°. Joint line orientation angles by the tibial plateau of 4° and 6°, joint line orientation angle by the middle knee joint space of 5°, medial proximal tibial angles of 95° and 98°, and Mikulicz joint line angle of 94° were KJLO cut-off values used in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

Based on current evidence, the actual association between postoperative KJLO and clinical consequences after HTO for medial knee osteoarthritis cannot be ascertained. The clinical relevance of KJLO after HTO remains controversial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Assessment of joint line obliquity and its related frontal deformity using long-standing radiographs

Purpose

To investigate how radiographic techniques and osteoarthritis grade influence measurements of knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) and KJLO-related frontal deformity, and to propose preferable KJLO measurement methods.

Methods

Forty patients with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis indicated for high tibial osteotomy were assessed. Measurements were compared between single-leg and double-leg standing radiographs for KJLO measurement methods including joint line orientation angle by femoral condyles (JLOAF), joint line orientation angle by middle knee joint space (JLOAM), joint line orientation angle by tibial plateau (JLOAT), Mikulicz joint line angle (MJLA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), as well as KJLO-related frontal deformity parameters including joint line convergence angle (JLCA), knee ankle joint angle (KAJA) and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). Influences of bipedal distance in double-leg standing and osteoarthritis grade on the above measurements were analysed. Measurement reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results

From single-leg to double-leg standing radiographs MPTA and KAJA did not change significantly, whereas the other measurements showed significant changes: JLOAF, JLOAM and JLOAT decreased 0.88°, 1.24° and 1.77°, MJLA and JLCA decreased 0.63° and 0.85°, and HKA increased 1.11° (p < 0.05). Bipedal distance in double-leg standing radiographs moderately correlated with JLOAF, JLOAM and JLOAT (rp = -0.555, -0.574 and -0.549). Osteoarthritis grade moderately correlated with JLCA in single-leg and double-leg standing radiographs (rs = 0.518 and 0.471). All measurements had at least good reliability.

Conclusion

In long-standing radiographs, measurements of JLOAF, JLOAM, JLOAT, MJLA, JLCA and HKA are all influenced by single-leg/double-leg standing; JLOAF, JLOAM and JLOAT are also affected by bipedal distance in double-leg standing; and JLCA is affected by osteoarthritis grade. Knee joint obliquity as assessed by MPTA measurement is independent of single-leg/double-leg standing, bipedal distance or osteoarthritis grade, and has excellent measurement reliability. We therefore propose MPTA as the preferable KJLO measurement method for clinical practice and future research.

Level of evidence

III, cross-sectional study.

Influence of lateral hinge fractures on biplanar medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy for valgus knee: a new classification of lateral hinge fracture

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of lateral hinge fractures in medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) on bone union.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were followed-up for more than 1 year after MCWDFO. The incidence and type of hinge fracture, as well as the course of bone healing, were investigated. Slow healing was defined as bone union was not obtained until 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Hinge fractures were observed in 12 cases (57%). There were three types of hinge fractures. Type 1: the lateral cortex was completely cut through (4 cases), type 2: the osteotomy line was too proximal (6 cases), and type 3: the hinge point was significantly medial (2 cases). There was a significant difference in the mean correction angles between hinge fracture and no-fracture cases, with the mean angles being 13.8 ± 4.0° and 9.6 ± 3.1°, respectively. Sixty-seven percent (8/12) of cases with hinge fractures developed slow healing. Among the hinge fracture cases, when there was no displacement of the hinge fracture and good contact with the anterior flange, 40% (2/5) of cases developed slow healing. If there was displacement of the hinge or no contact of the anterior flange, 86% (6/7) of cases developed slow healing. In contrast, only 11% (1/9) of subjects who did not have a hinge fracture, developed slow healing. In 67% (6/9) of cases with slow healing, a correction loss of 2° or greater (average: 4.3 degrees valgus) was observed. There were no cases of non-union. Clinical outcomes at 1 year showed no significant difference between the groups with and without hinge fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a very high risk of hinge fracture in patients undergoing MCWDFO. Hinge fractures often lead to slow healing and a loss of correction. We recommend the endpoint of the distal lateral cortex of the femur as the ideal hinge point for the prevention of hinge fractures. Bone union is obtained slowly in even all hinge fracture cases without revision surgery. Consequently, surgical results are not affected by the occurrence of hinge fracture at 1 year.

An artificial intelligence based on a convolutional neural network allows a precise analysis of the alignment of the lower limb

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to develop a numeric tool to automate the analysis of deformity from lower limb telemetry and assess its accuracy. Our hypothesis was that artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm would be able to determine mechanical and anatomical angles to within 1°.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, 1175 anonymized patient telemetries were extracted from a database of more than ten thousand telemetries. From this selection, 31 packs of telemetries were composed and sent to 11 orthopaedic surgeons for analysis. Each surgeon had to identify on the telemetries fourteen landmarks allowing determination of the following four angles: hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA). An algorithm based on a machine learning process was trained on our database to automatically determine angles. The reliability of the algorithm was evaluated by calculating the difference of determination precision between the surgeons and the algorithm.

RESULTS

The analysis time for obtaining 28 points and 8 angles per image was 48 ± 12 s for the algorithm. The average difference between the angles measured by the surgeons and the algorithm was around 1.9° for all the angles of interest: 1.3° for HKA, 1.6° for MPTA, 2.1° for LDFA, and 2.4° for JLCA. Intraclass correlation was greater than 95% for all angles.

CONCLUSION

The algorithm showed high accuracy for automated angle measurement, allowing the estimation of limb frontal alignment to the nearest degree.

Influence of hindfoot alignment on postoperative lower limb alignment in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

INTRODUCTION

We have experienced unexpected under-correction after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). Although the tibia was corrected accurately, the postoperative mechanical axis (MA) was less than 57%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between hindfoot alignment and postoperative lower limb alignment, and to reveal whether hindfoot alignment affects lower limb alignment after MOWHTO. Our hypothesis was that hindfoot alignment influences the postoperative MA in MOWHTO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective comparative study. The study cohort comprised 43 knees in 43 patients who underwent MOWHTO and had standing long-leg anteroposterior view and hindfoot alignment view radiographs taken preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. To evaluate the hindfoot alignment, the absolute value of the ankle joint line orientation relative to the ground was added to the absolute value of the hindfoot angle. We defined a postoperative MA of 57-67% as acceptable correction (A group) and a MA of < 56% as under-correction (U group). The two groups were analyzed to identify factors that affected postoperative limb alignment.

RESULTS

The preoperative hindfoot alignment angle was significantly larger in the U group than the A group. The preoperative hindfoot alignment angle was a significant predictive factor of the postoperative MA, and the cut-off value that distinguished under-correction from acceptable correction was 15.9 degrees.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal hindfoot alignment is one of the causes of under-correction after MOWHTO. Attention should be paid to the preoperative ankle joint line orientation relative to the ground and hindfoot angle. If the preoperative hindfoot alignment angle is ≥ 15.9 degrees, surgeons should reconsider the operative procedure and correction angle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III, retrospective study.

Femoral morphology affects postoperative alignment of the lower extremities in hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine correction error predictors of lower extremitiy alignment after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HCWHTO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2011 to 2015, 102 knees in 75 patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis of the knee and varus knee deformities who underwent HCWHTO were evaluated in this retrospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Preoperative radiological parameters including weight-bearing line ratio (WBL ratio), mechanical leg axis angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and JLCA under varus or valgus stress were measured. The knees were divided into the following three groups based on the WBL ratio on average 54 months after procedure: acceptable (WBL crossing the tibial plateau between 50 and 70%), under-correction (< 50%), and overcorrection (> 70%). A multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors that could influence postoperative WBL ratio and cut-off values of predictive preoperative factors was analysed.

RESULTS

Significant differences in pre- and postoperative WBL ratios and mechanical leg axis angles were found. Preoperative mLDFA in the under-correction group (89.4° ± 2.1°) was significantly higher than that in the overcorrection group (87.4° ± 2.2°) (p = 0.015), while other preoperative parameters revealed no significant differences. The postoperative MPTA in the under-correction group (92.1° ± 3.7°) was significantly lower than that in the other two groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0001, respectively), while there was no significant change between the acceptable (94.6° ± 3.4°) and the overcorrection (96.7° ± 3.2°) groups. Multiple regression analysis revealed that mLDFA (β =  - 0.316; p = 0.010) had a significant impact on postoperative WBLR. The cut-off value for under-correction of mLDFA was 89.5°and sensitivity and specificity were 53.6 and 71.6%, respectively (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative mLDFA is significantly associated with postoperative alignment in HCWHTO. While postoperative MPTA is important, disregarding the preoperative mLDFA may bears a high risk of malcorrection. Varus alignment of the knee with larger mLDFA may be an indication for not only HCWHTO, but also for distal femoral osteotomy.

Factors Associated With Unfavorable Radiological Outcomes After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Knees

BACKGROUND

Corrective osteotomy around the knee is based on deformity profiles of the femoral and tibial sides. Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) can be favored if the outcomes are not different, even if there is a certain degree of abnormal parameters after correction.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to identify the factors associated with unfavorable radiological outcomes after OWHTO for varus knees. Our hypothesis was that there would be an optimal situation in which double-level osteotomy (DLO) has advantages over isolated OWHTO and an optimal cutoff value of structural parameters for which DLO should be considered in patients with severe varus knees.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The radiological and clinical outcomes of 337 patients who underwent OWHTO were retrospectively evaluated. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the weightbearing line ratio (WBLR) (group 1: <25th percentile; group 2: 25th-75th percentile; and group 3: >75th percentile) and factors associated with unfavorable radiological outcomes. For the assessment of cutoff values of the parameters favoring DLO, unfavorable radiological outcomes were categorized as follows: (1) medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) >95°, (2) joint-line convergence angle (JLCA) >4° (insufficient medial release), (3) JLCA <0° (medial instability), (4) recurrence of a varus deformity, and (5) lateral hinge fracture.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 66.2 ± 19.1 months. A low preoperative WBLR was related to a larger preoperative to postoperative change (Δ) in the WBLR, a larger reduction in coronal translation, a larger ΔMPTA, a wide preoperative lateral joint space, and a narrow preoperative medial joint space (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .016, and P = .003, respectively). However, only an MPTA >95° was significantly related to a low WBLR in the subgroup analysis according to unfavorable radiological outcomes (P = .038). The cutoff value of ΔWBLR causing an MPTA >95° was 46.5%, which showed a good area under the curve of 0.800, with a sensitivity of 74.4% and a specificity of 82.7%. The clinical outcomes significantly improved at the final follow-up compared with those preoperatively, with no significant differences between the WBLR groups.

CONCLUSION

A ΔWBLR ≥46.5% led to an MPTA >95°. However, clinical outcomes were not affected. DLO should be considered if the surgeon desires a postoperative MPTA ≤95°.

Changes in joint space width over time and risk factors for deterioration of joint space width after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in joint space width (JSW) over time after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and identify risk factors for deterioration of JSW using anteroposterior (AP) and Rosenberg views.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed changes in JSW of 104 MOWHTO patients whose preoperative osteoarthritis (OA) grade was K-L grade 3 or less on AP and Rosenberg views. Serial changes in JSW were assessed from preoperatively to at least 3 years postoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups according to JSW change patterns on each of AP and Rosenberg views: non-deterioration group had either unchanged or increased JSW, and deterioration group had decreased JSW. Clinical outcomes were compared using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) score between groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for deterioration of JSW.

RESULTS

JSW on average for all patients increased 0.5 mm and 0.8 mm on AP and Rosenberg views, respectively (p < 0.05). Non-deterioration group showed significant improvement based on patient-reported outcomes (WOMAC) than deterioration group (all p < 0.05). Undercorrection was an independent risk factor for failure to achieve maintained or increased JSW on both AP (OR 6.885, 95% CI 1.976-23.986, p = 0.002) and Rosenberg (OR 12.756, 95% CI 2.952-55.129, p = 0.001) views.

CONCLUSION

JSW increased gradually and continuously on standing AP and Rosenberg views until postoperative 3 years after MOWHTO. Deterioration of JSW following MOWHTO was closely related to the undercorrection and affected clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case control study.

Iatrogenic ischiofemoral impingement due to high tibial osteotomy with overvalgization: a case report

Background

Open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a standard procedure for frontal realignment. It is indicated in varus knee with reduced mechanical medial proximal tibia angle. Overcorrection producing a mechanical medial proximal tibia angle out of the normal range (85–90°) is not recommended because this would lead to unphysiological joint-line orientation. Osteotomies around the knee also influence the adjacent ankle and hip joints. For the hip, it is known that frontal alignment of the leg influences the ischiofemoral space. A decreased ischiofemoral space can lead to painful impingement between the ischial bone and the lesser trochanter.

Case presentation

A 53-year-old German woman presented with severe ischiofemoral impingement symptoms and valgus malalignment of the left leg after open wedge high tibial osteotomy, which was indicated and performed by an orthopedic surgeon with intention to treat medial knee pain due to degenerative arthritis of the medial compartment years after medial meniscectomy. The mechanical medial proximal tibia angle was 100.5°. We performed closed wedge high tibial osteotomy producing a mechanical medial proximal tibia angle of 90.0° and normal joint-line orientation. The hip pain was gone immediately after the surgery, and the patient had no signs of ischiofemoral impingement or hip pain at last follow-up 12 months after closed wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Conclusions

Frontal realignment osteotomy around the knee can create problems at adjacent joints. Overvalgization of the proximal tibia made the patient compensate by hyperadduction of the hip to enable full foot sole contact with the floor. Hyperadduction of the hip decreased the ischiofemoral space, leading to severe impingement. Therefore, meticulous planning of osteotomies is important not to produce unphysiological situations or unwanted negative effects at the level of an adjacent joint.

Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction

INTRODUCTION

In absence of deformity or injury of the contralateral leg, the contralateral leg length is used to plan limb lengthening. Length variability on long-leg weight-bearing radiographs (LLR) can lead to inaccurate deformity correction. The aim of the study was to (1) examine the variability of the measured limb length on LLR and (2) to examine the influence of the position of the magnification device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The limb lengths of 38 patients during deformity correction with a taylor-spatial-frame were measured retrospectively on 7.3 ± 2.6 (4-13) LLR per patient. The measured length of the untreated limb between LLR were used to determine length variability between LLR in each patient. To answer the secondary aim, we took LLR from a 90 cm validation distance. A magnification device was placed in different positions: at the middle of the 90 cm distance (z-position), 5 cm anterior and 5 cm posterior from the z-position, at the bottom and top of the validation distance as well as 5 cm medial and 15 cm lateral from the z-position.

RESULTS

The measured length variability ranged within a patient from 10 to 50 mm. 76% of patients had a measured limb length difference of ≥ 2 cm between taken LLR. Compared to length measurement of the 90 cm test object with the magnification device in the z-position (90.1 cm), positioning the device 5 cm anterior led to smaller (88.6 cm) and 5 cm posterior led to larger measurements (91.7 cm). The measured length with the magnification device at the bottom, top, medial or lateral (90.4; 89.9; 90.2; 89.8 cm) to the object differed not relevantly.

CONCLUSIONS

High variability of limb length between different LLR within one patient was observed. This can result from different positions of the magnification device in the sagittal plane. These small changes in positioning the device should be avoided to achieve accurate deformity correction and bone lengthening. This should be considered for all length and size measurements on radiographs.

Early results with a bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a match-paired study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to compare 2 groups of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs): the bicruciate-retaining (BCR-group) and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-group), evaluating the functional results in the short-term follow-up.

METHODS

24 BCR were included in the study and were compared with a group of 24 TKAs performed with the same implant, but with sacrifice of the ACL and retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. For preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluation, the visual analogue score (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were used. Radiological evaluation included weight-bearing long-leg view, a Rosemberg view, lateral view of the knee and tangential view of the patella. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was recorded pre and postoperatively. Radiolucent lines (RLLs) were evaluated according the Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation System (KSRES).

RESULTS

At last follow-up the mean VAS score was 1.81 for BCR group and 1.43 for CR group (p = 0.61). The mean WOMAC score was 8.68 for BCR group and 12.81 for CR group (p = 0.33). As for the radiological evaluation, preoperative HKA angle was 0.53° varus for BCR group and 3.14° varus for CR group (p = 0.24); postoperative HKA was 0.72° valgus for BCR group and 0.38° valgus for CR group (p = 0.75). The percentage of RLLs was similar between the two groups (12% versus 15%).

CONCLUSIONS

BCR-TKA has showed to give similar functional and radiographic outcomes compared to conventional CR-TKA in a similar cohort of patients. An higher operative times and higher number of complications respect were found in BCR group. These results can be explained by the early learning curve experiences. Future randomized controlled trials should be performed to support new implant designs such as BCR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level of evidence Case-control study, level III.