Vitamin E-enriched polyethylene bearings are not inferior to Arcom bearings in primary total knee arthroplasty at medium-term follow-up

Vitamin E-enriched medium cross-linked polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty (VIKEP): clinical outcome, oxidation profile, and wear analysis in comparison to standard polyethylene-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The gliding surface of total knee endoprostheses is exposed to high loads due to patient weight and activity. These implant components are typically manufactured from ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Crosslinking of UHMWPE by ionizing radiation results in higher wear resistance but induces the formation of free radicals which impair mechanical properties after contact with oxygen. Medium-crosslinked UHMWPE enriched with vitamin E (MXE) provides a balance between the parameters for a sustainable gliding surface, i.e., mechanical strength, wear resistance, particle size, and oxidation stability. Therefore, a gliding surface for knee endoprostheses made up from this material was developed, certified, and launched. The aim of this study is to compare this new gliding surface to the established predecessor in a non-inferiority design.

METHODS

This multicenter, binational randomized controlled trial will enroll patients with knee osteoarthritis eligible for knee arthroplasty with the index device. Patients will be treated with a knee endoprosthesis with either MXE or a standard gliding surface. Patients will be blinded regarding their treatment. After implantation of the devices, patients will be followed up for 10 years. Besides clinical and patient-related outcomes, radiological data will be collected. In case of revision, the gliding surface will be analyzed biomechanically and regarding the oxidative profile.

DISCUSSION

The comparison between MXE and the standard gliding surface in this study will provide clinical data to confirm preceding biomechanical results in vivo. It is assumed that material-related differences will be identified, i.e., that the new material will be less sensitive to wear and creep. This may become obvious in biomechanical analyses of retrieved implants from revised patients and in radiologic analyses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04618016. Registered 27 October 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04618016?term=vikep&checkSpell=false&rank=1 . All items from the World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set can be found in Additional file 1.

Tibial implant design in primary TKA: retrospective comparison of two designs for the occurrence of radiolucent lines and aseptic loosening

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this retrospective study was to study the effect of tibial implant design on the occurrence of radiolucent lines (RLLs) and aseptic loosening (AL) by comparing two different total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two types of total knee arthroplasty, different for tibial shape, size and keel design were compared, 255 for the first and 774 for the second. The occurrence of RLLs and radiological signs of micro- and macro-mobility and aseptic loosening was analyzed. Demographic data were compared, as well as the type and rate of RLLs, occurrence of aseptic loosening and the presence of potential risk factors.

RESULTS

The first implant design is morphometric and has a squarer keel than the second implant TKA. The overall rate of RLLs was similar (21% vs 23%), despite of a significantly lower rates of radiological signs of macro-mobility of the tibial component with the first implant (2% vs 17%). Survivorship of both designs was overall comparable (99.6% vs 98.8 %) the first implant group had more potential risk factors for poor bone quality than the second group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A morphometric design is more anatomic and offers better bone coverage of the epiphyseal tibial surface. RLLs, as a sign of implant micro-mobility, were equally present in both designs. Radiological signs of macro-mobility at the metaphysis were less frequently observed in squared keel design. The morphometric implant did not show improved survivorship compared with a symmetric implant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A Review of Early In Vivo Performance of Antioxidant Stabilized Polyethylene for Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The incorporation of antioxidants into highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has emerged as an alternative to postirradiation thermal treatments for improving oxidation resistance. Currently, use of antioxidant stabilized HXLPE (AO-XLPE) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing. In this literature review, we asked: (1) How does the clinical performance of AO-XLPE compare to conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) or HXLPE for TKA? (2) What material changes occur in vivo for AO-XLPE in TKA? and (3) What is the risk of revision for AO-XLPE in TKA?

METHODS

We performed a search of the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed and Embase. Included studies reported the in vivo behavior of vitamin E-doped polyethylene in TKA. We reviewed 13 studies.

RESULTS

Across the studies, clinical results including revision rates, patient-reported outcome measurement scores, and the occurrence of osteolysis or radiolucent lines tended to be similar for AO-XLPE as compared to conventional UHMWPE or HXLPE controls. In retrieval analyses, AO-XLPE exhibited excellent resistance to oxidation and typical surface damage. Survival rates were positive and not significantly different from conventional UHMWPE or HXLPE. There were no cases of osteolysis for AO-XLPE and no revision due to polyethylene wear reported.

CONCLUSION

The purpose of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature regarding the clinical effectiveness of AO-XLPE in TKA. Overall, the results of our review indicated positive early-to mid-term clinical performance for AO-XLPE in TKA and similar outcomes as compared to conventional UHMWPE and HXLPE.

Cup positioning and its effect on polyethylene wear of vitamin E- and non-vitamin E-supplemented liners in total hip arthroplasty: radiographic outcome at 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening remains a challenging problem after total hip arthroplasty. Accurate cup placement and supplementation of antioxidants in acetabular liners might reduce material failure rates. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the cup position on the wear behaviour of UHMWPE-XE and UHMWPE-X liners in vivo using virtual radiographs.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. Clinical data of 372 probands were analyzed. Anteroposterior pelvic X-rays of 324 patients immediately postoperatively and after 1 and 5 years were evaluated by the RayMatch® analysis software regarding cup position and wear behaviour.

RESULTS

Mean cup anteversion was 20.3° (± 7.4) and inclination was 41.9° (± 7.0) postoperatively. 62.3% of all patients had an anteversion and inclination within the Lewinnek safe zone. Anterior and anterolateral approaches led to significantly higher cup anteversion compared to lateral approaches (27.3° ± 5.5; 20.9° ± 7.2; 17.5° ± 6.6; p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Mean anteversion increased to 24.6° (± 8.0) after 1 year (p < 0.001). Only one revision occurred because of implant dislocation. Wear rates from UHMWPE-X and UHMWPE-XE did not differ significantly. Anteversion angles ≥ 25° correlated to increased polyethylene wear (23.7 µm/year ± 12.8 vs. 31.1 µm/year ± 22.8, p = 0.012) and this was amplified when inclination angles were ≥ 50° (23.6 µm/year ± 12.8 vs. 38.0 µm/year ± 22.7, p = 0.062).

CONCLUSION

Anterior approaches lead to the highest inaccuracy of cup placement, but cup positioning outside the Lewinnek safe zone does not necessarily cause higher dislocation rates. Moreover, mean anteversion increased by approximately four degrees within the first year after operation, which is expected to be functional due to a regularization of pelvic tilt after intervention. Mid-term wear rates of UHMWPE-X and UHMWPE-XE liners are comparable, but steep cup positions lead to significantly increased polyethylene wear. In summary, a re-evaluation of target zones for intraoperative cup positioning might be considered. In the long-term reduced oxidative embrittlement could lead to superior wear behaviour of vitamin E-blended liners.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) is equivalent to conventional polyethylene (CPE) in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefits of HXLPE in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have not been as evident as total hip arthroplasty (THA). A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of highly-crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) on TKA outcomes compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE) is described.

METHODS

All studies comparing HXLPE with CPE for primary TKA were included for analysis. The minimum dataset included revision rates, indication for revision, aseptic component loosening and follow-up time. The primary outcome variables were all-cause revision, aseptic revision, revision for loosening, radiographic component loosening, osteolysis and incidence of radiolucent lines. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative functional knee scores. A random-effects meta-analysis allowing for all missing data was performed for all primary outcome variables.

RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, there were 2,234 knees (1,105 HXLPE and 1,129 CPE). The combined mean follow-up for all studies was 6 years. The aseptic revision rate in the HXLPE group was 1.02% compared to 1.97% in the CPE group. There was no difference in the rate of all-cause revision (p = 0.131), aseptic revision (p = 0.298) or revision for component loosening (p = 0.206) between the two groups. Radiographic loosening (p = 0.200), radiolucent lines (p = 0.123) and osteolysis (p = 0.604) was similar between both groups. Functional outcomes were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of HXLPE in TKA yields similar results for clinical and radiographic outcomes when compared to CPE at midterm follow-up. HXLPE does not confer the same advantages to TKA as seen in THA.