Dissociation of liner from cup in THA: does liner damage affect the risk of dissociation?

Polyethylene liner dissociation in cementless total hip arthroplasty: Ensuring accurate diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Uncemented acetabular components are widely used in modern total hip arthroplasty (THA). Modularity has numerous advantages including the ability to use supplementary screw fixation for the shell, and allow to switch from ceramic to polyethylene (PE) bearings and vice versa, and the use of lipped and face-changing liners.

OBJECTIVE

Despite these advantages, a problem with modular PE liners is dissociation. This is a rare complication in modern implants. The rate of liner dissociation is reported to be very low between 0.17% and 0.8%. Typical symptoms are sudden onset of groin pain in a previously well-functioning hip joint, followed by grinding or clicking sensations during hip joint motions indicating, that the femoral head is articulating with the metal acetabular shell rather than with the PE liner. Any newly observed noise or squeaking from a THA should undergo radiographic investigation to exclude liner dissociation.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of an 88-yearold male patient who developed PE liner dissociation in a cementless THA with a Pinnacle acetabular component six years after the index operation. We recommended revision of the left hip, which was performed two days later. In the interim, the patient was advised to use a pair of crutches. During revision surgery, it was observed that the metal head made contact with the cementless cup shell without damaging it from a macroscopic standpoint. Consequently, a simple exchange of the PE liner was conducted, and a 36 mm metal head was implanted due to scratches on the original head.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis facilitates a straightforward exchange of the liner along with the head, potentially preserving the osseous integrated cup shell and stem integrity. Routine radiologic follow-up allows to distinguish between PE liner dissociation and severe PE wear.

Impingement testing of total hip replacements according to ASTM F2582 - Implant wear, resistance to damage and acceptance criteria

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the resistance to impingement damage of three different artificially aged UHMWPE materials used for total hip joint replacement. The results obtained can be used as a basis for an acceptance criterion for testing according to ASTM F2582-20.

METHODS

Three different polyethylene liner materials, standard polyethylene (UHMWPE), moderately crosslinked (XLPE) and vitamin E stabilized crosslinked (XLPE-VE) polyethylene of the same design and manufacturer were tested up to one million impingement cycles according to ASTM F2582-20. The liners were artificially oxygen aged for two and three weeks according to ASTM F2003-02. The wear volumes of the liner, acetabular shells, and hip endoprosthesis stems were determined. Each of the six impingement test groups consisted of three samples. For each test group, a reference group was subjected to the same conditioning and loading conditions but without impingement between the hip stem and the liner. The force needed to disassemble the liner from the acetabular shell (push-out force) was determined according to ASTM F1820-22 for the test and the reference groups.

RESULTS

XLPE and XLPE-VE polyethylene groups showed less impingement wear when compared to the standard UHMWPE material. Similarly, the protective function of the liner against direct metal-on-metal contact was greater, resulting in less wear on the acetabular shell and the stem neck. The three weeks aged standard UHMWPE group showed early onset of fatigue delamination wear. The push-out values remained unchanged for all XLPE liners and the 3-week aged XLPE-VE liners. The aged UHMWPE liners showed low push-out strength due to component shrinkage caused by aging in combination with the tapered fixation used for this specific design.

SIGNIFICANCE

The largest polyethylene wear volume measured of XLPE and XLPE-VE polyethylene aged for two and three weeks was 15.05 mm³ (SD 0.56 mm³). The corresponding metal wear volume was 1.23 mm³ (SD 0.19 mm³) for the acetabular cup and 1.33 mm³ (SD 0.20 mm³) for the stem neck. Those values can support the definition of an acceptance criteria for impingement testing. The results of the push-out test required by ASTM F2582-20 should be evaluated with respect to geometry changes caused by aging. The protective effect of the polyethylene liner against metal-on-metal contact should be considered in the implant design phase in order to avoid implant failure due to metal debris.