The fate of missed atlanto-axial rotatory subluxation in children

Unexpected postoperative atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation after excision of melanocytic nevi of the head and neck in older children: two case reports and literature review

Postoperative atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation (AARS) is a rare complication that develops almost exclusively in children following oropharyngeal and otologic surgeries, proposing that oropharyngeal inflammatory responses and excessive head rotation are responsible factors. However, there have been no reports of AARS after excision of a nevus on the head and neck. Here, we present two cases of AARS following limited head rotation during simple nevus excision. Patient 1, a 9-year-old girl, complained of neck pain and limited range of motion after excision of the nevus on the neck. After 2 months, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging finally revealed AARS with a ruptured transverse atlantal ligament. A month of halo traction was required for the treatment. Patient 2, an 11-year-old girl, presented with immediate pain and limited neck extension after tissue expander insertion under the upper chest and excision of the nevus on her left cheek. The diagnosis was promptly made using cervical spine radiography. A cervical collar was applied for 1 month. Both patients recovered without any complications after treatment. This report highlights the importance of suspicion for AARS after surgery regardless of surgical duration or amount of head rotation.

Torticollis in childhood-a practical guide for initial assessment

Torticollis is encountered often in the paediatric setting and should be considered a presenting symptom, rather than a diagnosis. Aetiologies of torticollis are numerous, and the nomenclature describing underlying diagnosis can be confusing. Furthermore, children with torticollis typically present in the first instance to primary or secondary care rather than to the subspecialist. These factors can contribute to erroneous treatment of this patient-group which could be time critical in some instances. In this review, we discuss the common causes for torticollis and propose a simple clinical assessment tool and early management scheme that will assist in the differential-diagnosis and treatment pathway of this challenging condition.Conclusion: Torticollis can be the initial presentation of various conditions. The diagnosis and management tools provided in this article can aid in guiding paediatricians as to the correct initial management, imaging, and specialist referral. What is Known: • Torticollis in childhood is a very common presenting symptom with numerous aetiologies. • Management is complex, requires multiple clinical and imaging examinations, and is usually performed by non-specialized professionals. What is New: • A new, simple clinical-assessment tool under the acronym PINCH designed to aid paediatric general practitioners in diagnosing correctly the aetiology of torticollis. • A practical management scheme to aid in the treatment pathway of children with torticollis.

Halter Traction for the Treatment of Atlantoaxial Rotatory Fixation

BACKGROUND

Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) comprises a spectrum of abnormal rotational relationships between C1 (atlas) and C2 (axis). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and long-term clinical outcomes of halter traction in treating patients diagnosed with primary AARF.

METHODS

We included patients <18 years of age who presented with new-onset painful torticollis, neck pain, and sternocleidomastoid muscle spasm, had an AARF diagnosis confirmed by use of 3-dimensional dynamic computed tomography, received in-hospital cervical halter traction under our treatment protocol, and were followed for ≥12 months. Radiographic and long-term clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients (31 male and 12 female; average age of 7.9 years) satisfied the inclusion criteria. There were 5 acute, 6 subacute, and 32 chronic cases. The mean duration of initial symptoms prior to treatment was 12.1 weeks. Thirty-seven (86.0%) of the patients experienced previous minor trauma, and 6 (14.0%) had a recent history of upper-respiratory infection (Grisel syndrome). The mean duration of in-hospital traction was 17.6 days. The mean follow-up period was 8.5 years. Forty-two (97.7%) of the patients achieved normal cervical alignment after treatment. One patient (2.3%) had recurrence and received a second course of halter traction, with cervical alignment restored without any surgical intervention. No neurological deficits were noted during or after the treatment. No major complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Normal anatomy and restoration of cervical alignment can be achieved by cervical halter traction in most cases of AARF.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in childhood: a staged management strategy incorporating manipulation under anaesthesia

AIMS

The aims were to evaluate the safety of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) for atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) and the relative efficacy of rigid collar vs halo-body orthosis (HBO) in avoiding relapse and the need for open surgery.

METHODS

Cases of CT-verified AARF treated by MUA were identified from a neurosurgical operative database. Demographic details, time to presentation and aetiology of AARF were ascertained through case note review. Cases were divided according to method of immobilisation after successful reduction, either rigid collar (group 1) or HBO (group 2). The primary outcome measure was relapse requiring open surgical arthrodesis.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (2.2-12.7 years) satisfied inclusion criteria. Time to presentation varied from 1 day to 18 months. There were 19 patients in group 1 and 14 in group 2. There were no adverse events associated with MUA. 9/19 (47%) patients in group 1 resolved without need for further treatment compared with 10/14 (71%) in group 2 (p = 0.15). Of the 10 patients who failed group 1 treatment, four resolved after HBO. A total of ten patients (30%) failed treatment and required open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

MUA is a safe procedure for AARF where initial conservative measures have failed. MUA followed by immobilisation avoids the need for open surgery in over two thirds of cases. Immobilisation by cervical collar appears equally effective to HBO as an initial management, and so a step-wise approach may be reasonable. Delayed presentation may be a risk factor for relapse and need for open surgery.

Systematic review of the nonsurgical management of atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in childhood

OBJECTIVE

Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) is an acquired fixed abnormality of C1-2 joint rotation associated with torticollis in childhood. If the condition is left uncorrected, patients are at risk for developing C1-2 fusion with permanent limitation in the cervical range of movement, cosmetic deformity, and impact on quality of life. The management of AARF and the modality of nonsurgical treatment are poorly defined in both primary care and specialized care settings, and the optimal strategy is not clear. This systematic review aims to examine the available evidence to answer key questions relating to the nonsurgical management of AARF.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Healthcare Management Information Consortium (HMIC), EMCare, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), British Nursing Index (BNI), and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED). Search criteria were created and checked independently among the authors. All articles with a radiological diagnosis of AARF and primary outcome data that met the study inclusion criteria were included and analyzed by the authors.

RESULTS

Search results did not yield any level I evidence such as a meta-analysis or randomized controlled trial. The initial search yielded 724 articles, 228 of which were screened following application of the core exclusion criteria. A total of 37 studies met the full criteria for inclusion in this review, consisting of 4 prospective studies and 33 retrospective case reviews. No articles directly compared outcomes between modalities of nonsurgical management. Six studies compared the outcome of AARF based on duration of symptoms before initiation of treatment. Comparative analysis of studies was hindered by the wide variety of treatment modalities described and the heterogeneity of outcome data.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors did not identify any level I evidence comparing different nonsurgical management approaches for AARF. There were few prospective studies, and most studies were uncontrolled, nonrandomized case series. Favorable outcomes were often reported regardless of treatment methods, with early treatment of AARF tending to yield better outcomes independent of the treatment modality. There is a lack of high-quality data, and further research is required to determine the optimal nonsurgical treatment strategy.

Atlantoaxial Rotatory Subluxation: A Rare Complication of Craniofacial Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Neck pain is common in the post-operative period after craniofacial procedures. If patients present with neck pain and torticollis, it could be a manifestation of atlantoaxial rotatory subluxlation (AARS), which describes a rare condition in which there is lateral displacement of C1 relative to C2. When this occurs in the post-operative patient, it is termed Grisel syndrome. In this case series, we report on 3 patients diagnosed with Grisel syndrome after a craniofacial procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of a single craniofacial surgeon at a pediatric hospital was conducted over the last 3 decades. Demographics, procedures performed, and management strategies of AARS were included for review.

RESULTS

Three patients were identified who were diagnosed with Grisel syndrome after a craniofacial procedure and required inpatient cervical traction. All patients presented with torticollis within 1 week of their operation. Conservative management was ineffective, and all 3 patients were admitted for inpatient cervical traction, for an average of 13 days followed by an average of 47 days of outpatient therapy. No patients showed any signs of recurrence after removal of outpatient traction device.

CONCLUSION

Grisel syndrome is a rare, but serious complication of craniofacial procedures. Physicians caring for these patients must have a high degree of suspicion if a patient with a recent craniofacial procedure presents with torticollis. Delaying the initiation of therapy has been shown to lead to higher rates of recurrence and increases the likelihood that patients will require surgical intervention.

Interventional magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic and therapeutic method in treating acute pediatric atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation

Atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation or fixation (AARF) is a rare condition, usually occurring in pediatric patients. It mimics benign torticollis but may result in permanent disability or death. The condition requires prompt diagnosis by thorough examination to avoid any treatment delays. Spiral computed tomography (CT) with three-dimensional reconstruction CT is recommended for identifying incongruence between C1 and C2 vertebrae, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be performed to exclude ligamentous injuries. In addition to static imaging, dynamic CT involves the reduction between C1 and C2 being confirmed using CT with the head turned maximally to the left and right. The present report (level of evidence, III) provides a method for treating AARF that has similar advantages as dynamic CT but avoids ionizing radiation by replacing CT with interventional MRI. The new method comprised simultaneous axial traction and manual closed reduction, performed under general anesthesia, and the use of interventional MRI to ensure that reduction was achieved and held. The head is turned maximally to the right and left during the manual reduction. A rigid cervical collar was used following reduction. Dynamic CT was not required but prior diagnostic static CT was performed in preparation. No further CT was required. There appears to be no previous studies on interventional MRI in AARF care. Being superior in its diagnostic soft-tissue visualization performance and lacking ionizing radiation, interventional MRI is a potential option for investigating and treating acute AARF in non-syndromic patients with no trauma history.

Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation: a serious potential complication of paediatric ENT surgery that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND

Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation is a persistent deformity of the C1-2 vertebral relationship caused by subluxation of the articular surfaces, and can occur after positioning for ENT procedures where the head is rotated - for example to access the ear or posterior triangle of the neck. If promptly recognised, it can usually be managed successfully with conservative methods, without long-lasting sequelae, but delayed or inappropriate management may lead to permanent neck deformity, neurological problems and pain.

METHOD

Case review.

CASE REPORT

Two children with atlanto-axial rotatory fixation following ENT surgery; one child was referred early and managed successfully, and one had delayed referral resulting in permanent severe positional deformity.

CONCLUSION

Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation is easily missed; there are significant clinical and medicolegal implications if it is not promptly recognised. A suggested management algorithm is presented.

Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation as a rare complication from head positioning in otologic surgery: Report of two cases in young children

BACKGROUND

Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation is a condition in which the first and second vertebrae of the cervical spine become interlocked in a rotated position. This condition can result in serious consequences and thus have a significant impact on patients, especially when diagnosis and treatment are delayed. Some cases of atlantoaxial rotatory fixation have been described in association with otologic surgery or plastic surgery involving the ear. We present the cases of two pediatric patients who developed atlantoaxial rotatory fixation following otologic surgery and we review the relevant literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

One patient was a 7-year-old boy who underwent tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma. The other patient was a 5-year-old girl with profound sensorineural hearing loss who underwent cochlear implantation. Both patients developed atlantoaxial rotatory fixation on the day after surgery, and they were treated conservatively. Our literature search using relevant terms identified 12 similar published cases. Thus, a total of 14 patients, including our 2 patients, were evaluated. Most of the patients were children and typically they complained of painful torticollis and exhibited a characteristic posture called the "cock-robin" position on the day after surgery. Mostly, the direction of torticollis was opposite to the side of surgery. Most of the patients received conservative treatment alone, but three underwent surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

The correlation between the direction of torticollis and the side of surgery suggests that rotation of the head during surgery has an impact on development of postoperative atlantoaxial rotatory fixation. Thus, children undergoing otologic surgery are thought to be at a risk of postoperative atlantoaxial rotatory fixation. Although rare, the surgical team needs to be aware of this adverse event and pay close attention to this possibility throughout the perioperative period. Perioperative management should include informed consent, preoperative assessment of the range of head and neck motion, proper intraoperative positioning and monitoring of the position, and postoperative follow-up. Postoperative atlantoaxial rotatory fixation is not completely preventable, but good perioperative management can minimize the damage resulting from this condition.

Efficacy of nonfusion treatment for subacute and chronic atlanto-axial rotatory fixation in children

BACKGROUND

Historical guidelines suggest limited efficacy for nonfusion treatment of chronic atlanto-axial rotatory subluxation/fixation (AARF). Surgical fusion has potential side effects; therefore, it is important to understand the role for nonfusion treatment of chronic AARF. This case series examines the success rate of nonfusion treatment.

METHODS

A key word search was used to identify all patients with AARF with delayed presentation of ≥ 4 weeks. Fifteen patients met study inclusion criteria and had adequate clinical information for review. Data collected included age, sex, delay in presentation, mechanism of injury, severity of subluxation (Fielding classification), treatment, follow-up, and clinical information at latest follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 11 girls and 3 boys with an average age of 7.2 years (range, 1.5 to 12 years). Initial treatment of 3 patients included fusion. Eleven patients were initially treated without fusion. Eight of these 11 patients were successfully reduced with either halter traction, halo gravity traction, and noninvasive halo or halo vest, and reduction was maintained without fusion (73%) at 10.3 years follow-up. Three patients (27%) experienced recurrence of AARF at an average time of 2 weeks (range, 0 to 4 wk) and were treated with fusion. Average delay in presentation for all patients was 18 weeks (range, 4 to 92 wk), whereas it was 6 weeks and 9.3 weeks in those successfully treated without fusion and in those who failed nonfusion treatment, respectively. Age, delay in presentation, and underlying diagnosis were similar for fusion and nonfusion groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AARF may recur after a trial of reduction and nonfusion treatment, pediatric patients with delayed presentation (>1 month) of AARF may be treated with an initial trial of nonfusion treatment. Parents should be counseled about the risk of recurrence and possible need for ultimate fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic retrospective comparative study.

Successful conservative treatment for neglected rotatory atlantoaxial dislocation

BACKGROUND

Rotatory atlantoaxial subluxation (RAS) is a rare condition that is often misdiagnosed and therefore incorrectly managed. We describe our experience and propose an algorithm for treating neglected RAS nonoperatively.

METHODS

All consecutive children with neglected (>6 wk) RAS were treated in our department between 2005 and 2010 by cervical traction using a Gleason traction device and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants. When reduction was not achieved, the Gleason device was replaced by a halo device without manipulative reduction, and weight was added as necessary until reduction was successful. Fixation of reduction was either by a sternooccipital mandibular immobilizer or a halo vest for 3 to 4 months.

RESULTS

All 5 children (4 boys and 1 girl, aged 4 to 11 y) were successfully treated for neglected RAS. The mean duration from symptom onset (eg, limited neck range of motion, discomfort) to treatment initiation was 11.6 weeks (range, 6 to 16 wk). Closed reduction was achieved by a Gleason or a noninvasive halo device within 1 to 2 weeks in 4 cases. The fifth case was reduced after 5 weeks of traction using a halo with a 5 kg weight. All children had symmetrical full range of motion, normal neurological examination, and were fully engaged in educational and sports activities without recurrent dislocations at final follow-up (mean, 30 mo; range, 18 to 49 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative treatment by gradual and prolonged traction without manipulative reduction in neglected RAS might be a successful method. Reduction can often be achieved within 2 weeks of treatment onset.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV (retrospective case series).

Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation--a cause of torticollis

BACKGROUND

A rare, but important cause of torticollis in children is atlantoaxial rotatory fixation. If the patient remains undiagnosed for more than three months, surgery is generally the only therapeutic alternative. In this article we present our experiences of surgical treatment of late-diagnosed atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in children.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This article is based on a review of the case notes of patients who underwent surgery for atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in the Department for Neurosurgery at Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, during the period 2004-10.

RESULTS

The material sample consists of six children aged from seven to 14 years. Five had suffered minor trauma to the upper neck region, while one had had an upper respiratory tract infection. The diagnosis was made 5-36 months after the onset of symptoms. In three of the patients, an attempt was made at closed reduction without success. A CT scan one year postoperatively showed a normal position of the atlantoaxial joint in two patients and partial reduction in three. In the sixth patient there was bone fusion at the time of the operation, and open reduction was unsuccessful. All six patients had reduced rotational movement of the neck at the one-year check-up.

INTERPRETATION

All our patients were diagnosed more than five months after the onset of symptoms. Full or partial reduction was achieved in five of the six.

Atlantoaxial Rotatory Fixation

OBJECTIVE

Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) remains a recondite entity. Our normative study using CT motion analysis shows that there is a high degree of concordance for rotational behavior of C1 and C2 in children 0 to 18 years. C1 always crosses C2 at or near 0 degree. The predictable relationship between C1 and C2 is depicted by 3 distinct regions on the motion curve: when C1 rotates from 0 to 23 degrees, it moves alone while C2 remains stationary at 0 (the single-motion phase). When C1 rotates from 24 to 65 degrees, C1 and C2 move together (the double-motion phase), but C1 always moves faster as C2 is being pulled by yoking ligaments. From 65 degrees onward, C1 and C2 move in unison (the unison-motion phase) with a fixed, maximal separation angle of approximately 43 degrees, the head rotation being carried exclusively by the subaxial segments. Because of this high concordance among patients and a relatively narrow variance from the mean, the physiological composite motion curve can be used as a normal template for the diagnosis and classification of AARF.

METHODS

Using a 3-position CT protocol to obtain the diagnostic motion curve, we identified 3 distinct types of AARF. Type I AARF patients show essentially unaltered (“locked”) C1–C2 coupling regardless of corrective counterrotation, with curves that are horizontal lines in the upper 2 quadrants of the template. Type II AARF patients show reduction of the C1–C2 separation angle with forced correction, but C1 cannot be made to cross C2. Their curves slope downward from the right to left upper quadrants but never traverse the x axis. Type III AARF patients show C1–C2 crossover but only when the head is cranked far to the opposite side. Their motion curves traverse the x axis far left of 0 degree ( C1 &lt; −20). Thus, type I, II, and III AARF are in descending degrees of pathological stickiness. A fourth group of patients showing motion curve features between normal and type III AARF are designated as belonging to a diagnostic gray zone (DGZ). The AARF patients are further classified as acute if treatment is started less than 1 month from the onset of symptoms, as subacute if the delay in treatment is 1 to 3 months, and chronic if treatment delay exceeds 3 months. The treatment protocol for AARF consists of reduction using either halter or caliper traction and then immobilization with brace or halo, depending on the AARF type and chronicity. Recurrent slippage and irreducibility are treated with C1–C2 fusion.

RESULTS

The treatment course and outcome of AARF are analyzed according to the AARF type and chronicity. The difficulty and duration of treatment, the number of recurrent slippage, the rate of irreducibility, the need for halo and fusion, and the percentage ultimately losing normal C1–C2 rotation are significantly greater in type I patients than type III patients, with type II patients somewhere in between. Likewise, all parameters are much worse in patients with any type of chronic AARF than acute AARF. The worse subgroup is chronic type I versus the best subgroup of acute type III. Recurrent AARF patients do much worse than nonrecurrent AARF patients. Recurrence is, in turn, adversely influenced by both the severity (type) and chronicity of AARF. The symptoms of most DGZ patients will resolve with analgesics, but a few remain symptomatic or deteriorate to true AARF requiring the full treatment.

CONCLUSION

Thus, children with painful torticollis should undergo the 3-position CT protocol not only to confirm the diagnosis of AARF but also to grade its severity. Closed reduction with traction should be instituted immediately to avoid the serious consequences of chronicity. Proper typing and reckoning of the pretreatment delay are requisites for selecting treatment modalities. Recurrent dislocation and incomplete reduction should be treated with posterior C1–C2 fusion in the best achievable alignment.

Movement disorder emergencies

Movement disorder emergencies include any movement disorder which evolves over hours to days, in which failure to appropriately diagnose and manage can result in patient morbidity or mortality. It is crucial that doctors recognize these emergencies with accuracy and speed by obtaining the proper history and by being familiar with the phenomenology of frequently encountered movements. These disorders will be discussed based on the most common associated involuntary movement, either parkinsonism, dystonia, chorea, tics or myoclonus, and, when available, review the workup and treatment options based on the current literature.

Pathognomonic radiological signs for predicting prognosis in patients with chronic atlantoaxial rotatory fixation

OBJECT

The authors conducted a study to assess the correlation between radiological features and clinical courses in patients with chronic atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) and to determine diagnostic imaging signs for predicting prognosis.

METHODS

There were 24 patients (eight boys and 16 girls) whose mean age was 7.8 years (range 4-14 years) and in whom AARF was diagnosed. The mean follow-up duration was 3.7 years (range 5 weeks-12 years). There were two groups of patients: 15 patients who visited the hospital less than 8 weeks after symptom (torticollis) onset comprised the acute group, and nine patients in whom the diagnosis of AARF was established later than 3 months after symptom onset comprised the chronic group. The chronic group was divided into two subgroups: those in whom the closed reduction could be achieved and those in whom it could not. Clinical data and radiographic studies, including plain radiographs and plain and three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) reconstructions, were reviewed retrospectively. A deformity of the superior C-2 facet joint was frequently observed in the group of patients with chronic AARF (p < 0.0001). This sign represented a risk factor for recurrent dislocation (p = 0.0003, Fisher exact test). Prominent lateral inclination of C-1 was an impeding factor for reduction of chronic AARF (p < 0.0001, analysis of variance with Fisher post hoc test). Greater than 20 degrees of lateral inclination of the atlas indicated an irreducible subluxation (p = 0.0023, Fisher exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

Both facet joint deformity and lateral inclination observed on 3D CT reconstructions can be useful signs to predict the prognosis and the treatment of choice in patients with chronic AARFs.

AtlantoAxial Rotatory Fixation: Part 3—A Prospective Study of the Clinical Manifestation, Diagnosis, Management, and Outcome of Children with AlantoAxial Rotatory Fixation

OBJECTIVE:

This is a prospective study of the clinical manifestations, diagnostic motion analysis, management, and outcome of children with atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF).

METHODS:

Fifty children presenting with painful torticollis were subjected to the three-head positions diagnostic computed tomographic scanning protocol described in Part II of our AARF study. Twenty-nine children qualified as having AARF (8 Type I, 11 Type II, and 10 Type III), and six children were classified in the diagnostic gray zone (DGZ). The AARF patients were given either halter or calipers traction depending on the type and chronicity of pretreatment delay. Upon reduction, patients were immobilized with either a cervicothoracic brace or a halo. Recurrence of AARF on halo and patients whose deformity was not reducible were given posterior C1C2 fusion at the best achievable alignment. The difficulty and results of treatment were measured according to the following: duration of traction, number of reduction slippage, percent not reducible by traction, percent needing halo, percent needing fusion, total duration of treatment, total number of treatment procedures, and percent who lost normal C1C2 dynamics. Results were compared between groups stratified by AARF types, by chronicity of pretreatment delay (acute ≪ 1 mo, subacute = 1–3 mo, chronic ≥ 3 mo) and by the presence or absence of recurrence (recurrent AARF defined as having two or more slippages). DGZ patients were treated with only comfort measures for 2 weeks and then restudied. Only those children with persistent symptoms and DGZ or worse motion dynamics were given traction and bracing.

RESULTS:

Neither age nor etiology significantly influenced the severity of AARF. There was only a slight tendency for children younger than 5 years, and for trauma, to associate with severe C1C2 interlock. Delay of treatment up to 11 months did not result in improvement of the neck restriction or in abatement of pain. In fact, there are strong suggestions that prolonged delay could lead to worsening of the rotatory dynamics: Type I AARF are highly correlated with delays longer than 3 months and Type III with delays less than 1 month. Also, four patients who had serial motion studies during the delay period showed clear worsening in the pathological stickiness in C1C2 rotation. In addition, chronic rotatory deformity led to progressive occiput −C1 separation or laxity teleologically to compensate for a skewed visual axis. The mean occiput −C1 separation angle for chronic patients was 31.2° versus 5° for acute patients and less than 3° for normal children. The difficulty and duration of treatment, the number of reslippage after reduction, the rate of irreducibility, the need for halo and fusion, and the percentile of patients ultimately loosing normal C1C2 rotation were significantly greater with Type I patients than Type III patients, with Type II patients being intermediate. Likewise, chronic patients of all AARF types were much worse in all parameters than acute patients; subacute patients were closer to chronic patients in complexity and outcome. Severity and chronicity exerted independent effects on outcome, and the worse identifiable subgroup were the chronic Type I patients versus the best subgroup of acute Type III patients.

Thirteen patients developed recurrent AARF; they had much worse prognosis in all aspects measured than nonrecurrent patients. Recurrence was adversely influenced by both the severity (type) and chronicity of AARF. Half of the DGZ patients resolved with analgesics, but two of six remained symptomatic and in DGZ dynamics, and one deteriorated to Type III AARF. Two of those three patients responded easily to traction and bracing, and one was lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION:

Children with painful torticollis should be subjected to the three-position computed tomographic diagnostic protocol, not only to secure the diagnosis of AARF but also to grade the severity of the condition by virtue of the dynamic motion curve. Closed reduction with traction should be instituted immediately to avoid the serious consequences of chronic AARF. Proper typing and reckoning of the pretreatment delay are requisites for selecting treatment modalities. Recurrent dislocation and incomplete reduction should be treated with posterior C1C2 fusion in the best achievable alignment. Open reduction and halo immobilization to avoid permanent fixation can be tried with select cases.

Successful reduction for a pediatric chronic atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (Grisel syndrome) with long-term halter traction: case report

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical case report of atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) in a girl presenting with torticollis and neck pain.

OBJECTIVE

To report this rare case that was successfully treated with long-term traction and a brace.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

AARF is a rare kind of subluxation that is a pathologic fixation of the atlas on the axis. It is most common in pediatric patients and is usually reduced easily with conservative treatments only in the acute stage. However, previously reported chronic AARFs have usually been treated with operative reductions. Although high success rates have been achieved with operative reduction in chronic cases of AARF, even successful operative reduction may result in significant neck motion limitation.

METHODS

A 9-year-old girl had torticollis of more than 3 months duration develop as a result of an upper respiratory infection. Dynamic computerized tomography showed consistent fixation of the atlantoaxial joint consistent with type 1 AARF according to the classification of Li and Pang. The patient was treated with halter traction of 5-lb weight for 6 weeks, and with a brace for 4 months and collar for 2 months.

RESULTS

We successfully treated this patient with chronic AARF only with cervical traction. She had full recovery of neck motion and normal atlantoaxial angle on follow-up computerized tomography after 6 months.

CONCLUSION

From this case, we suggest that long-term traction could be another treatment method for chronic AARF, especially in children.

Movement disorder emergencies

For the past 4 years, Dr. Stanley Fahn and I have given a course at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting on the topic of movement disorder emergencies. The purpose of this review article is to summarize the topic and to present it to readers of this journal. The text of this article has appeared in nearly the same form as the Academy syllabus accompanying our course. It is being presented here so that readers of the journal may review the material.

Grisel's syndrome in head and neck practice

Grisel's syndrome is a rare condition of uncertain etiology characterized by a non-traumatic atlanto-axial subluxation, secondary to an infection in the head and neck region. The authors discuss the history, pathogenesis, terminology, classification, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and prevention of this syndrome.

Movement disorder emergencies in the perioperative period

Movement disorder emergencies are uncommon in the perioperative period; however, when they occur, then carry significant morbidity. By paying attention to the phenomenology of the movement disorder, the effects of medications administered in the operating room, and unusual sequelae of surgery, neurologists can have a positive impact on the outcome of these patients.

Open reduction of pediatric atlantoaxial rotatory fixation: long-term outcome study with functional measurements

OBJECT

Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) is an uncommon disorder of childhood in which resolution usually occurs spontaneously or after traction therapy. In a minority of children irreducible or chronic fixation develop, and the natural history then usually involves restriction of head on neck movement, abnormal head position, and progressive facial asymmetry. The conventional management in these cases has been a posterior fusion.

METHODS

The authors performed an open reduction via the extreme-lateral approach without adjunctive fixation surgery in 13 children who ranged in age from 4 to 11 years. Postoperatively, halo jacket therapy was undertaken for 8 to 12 weeks. There were no neurological complications despite damage to one vertebral artery and one wound infection. Functional outcome was assessed after a minimum of 24 months (range 29-72 months). Facial asymmetry markedly improved. Sagittal movements were similar to those observed in control individuals. Axial rotation, although reduced compared with that in controls, was present but usually asymmetrical.

CONCLUSIONS

In the authors' opinion, open reduction provides the best possibility of normal facial development and return of axial movement in cases of AARF.

Acute atlanto-axial post-operative subluxation following posterior C1/2 fusion

Two cases referred with acute post-operative C1/2 subluxation following posterior fusion are reported. Both cases had initial treatment for atlanto-axial instability with posterior cable (Brooks and interspinous) and graft techniques, and placed immediately in a Philadelphia collar. One case was found to have subluxed immediately post-operatively when failing to breathe following reversal of anaesthetic agents, and despite immediate realignment and reoperation was left with a significant quadriparesis. The other patient was noted to have subluxed on routine X-ray on day 4, and had no neurological deficit before or after reoperation. Risk factors for this dangerous complication are discussed and the techniques of C1/2 posterior fusion and stabilization are reviewed in detail. Surgeons performing atlanto-axial stabilization procedures should be familiar with and have expertize in the complete range of techniques described and choose the one most appropriate for the patient's individual requirements.

Management of pediatric cervical spine and spinal cord injuries

DIAGNOSTIC

STANDARDS

There is insufficient evidence to support diagnostic standards.

GUIDELINES

In children who have experienced trauma and are alert, conversant, have no neurological deficit, no midline cervical tenderness, and no painful distracting injury, and are not intoxicated, cervical spine x-rays are not necessary to exclude cervical spine injury and are not recommended. In children who have experienced trauma and who are either not alert, nonconversant, or have neurological deficit, midline cervical tenderness, or painful distracting injury, or are intoxicated, it is recommended that anteroposterior and lateral cervical spine x-rays be obtained.

OPTIONS

In children younger than age 9 years who have experienced trauma, and who are nonconversant or have an altered mental status, a neurological deficit, neck pain, or a painful distracting injury, are intoxicated, or have unexplained hypotension, it is recommended that anteroposterior and lateral cervical spine x-rays be obtained. In children age 9 years or older who have experienced trauma, and who are nonconversant or have an altered mental status, a neurological deficit, neck pain, or a painful distracting injury, are intoxicated, or have unexplained hypotension, it is recommended that anteroposterior, lateral, and open-mouth cervical spine x-rays be obtained. Computed tomographic scanning with attention to the suspected level of neurological injury to exclude occult fractures or to evaluate regions not seen adequately on plain x-rays is recommended. Flexion/extension cervical x-rays or fluoroscopy may be considered to exclude gross ligamentous instability when there remains a suspicion of cervical spine instability after static x-rays are obtained. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine may be considered to exclude cord or nerve root compression, evaluate ligamentous integrity, or provide information regarding neurological prognosis.

TREATMENT

STANDARDS

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards.

GUIDELINES

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines.

OPTIONS

Thoracic elevation or an occipital recess to prevent flexion of the head and neck when restrained supine on an otherwise flat backboard may allow for better neutral alignment and immobilization of the cervical spine in children younger than 8 years because of the relatively large head in these younger children and is recommended. Closed reduction and halo immobilization for injuries of the C2 synchondrosis between the body and odontoid is recommended in children younger than 7 years. Consideration of primary operative therapy is recommended for isolated ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine with associated deformity.

A pictorial review of atlanto-axial rotatory fixation: key points for the radiologist

Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation (AARF) is a rare condition which occurs more commonly in children than in adults. The terminology can be confusing and the condition is also known as 'atlanto-axial rotatory subluxation' and 'atlanto-axial rotary dislocation'. Rotatory fixation is the preferred term, however, as in most cases the fixation occurs within the normal range of rotation of the joint. By definition, therefore, the joint is neither subluxed nor dislocated. AARF is a cause of acquired torticollis. Diagnosis can be difficult and is often delayed. The radiologist plays a key role in confirming the diagnosis. The classification system proposed by Fielding in 1977 is most frequently used and will be discussed in detail. Given that this classification system was devised in the days before computed tomography (CT), as well as the fact that combined atlanto-axial and atlanto-occipital rotatory subluxation (AORF) is omitted from the classification, we propose a modification to the classification of this rare but significant disorder. The radiological findings in six cases of AARF will be illustrated, including a case with associated atlanto-occipital subluxation. The pertinent literature is reviewed and a more comprehensive classification system proposed. The imaging approach to diagnosis and the orthopaedic approach to management will be discussed.