The long-term efficacy and safety of new biological therapies for psoriasis

Short-term risk and long-term incidence rate of infection and malignancy with IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors in adult patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The risk of infection and malignancy may be a concern for patients with psoriasis receiving interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors, particularly with long-term treatments. We aimed to estimate the short-term risks and long-term incidence rates of infection and malignancy with IL-17 or IL-23 antagonists in adult patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis through this comprehensive meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022363127). We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov until May 17, 2023 for randomized placebo-controlled trials and long-term (≥ 52 weeks) open-label extension studies. The estimates of short-term risk ratios (RRs) and long-term exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) were pooled using R software 4.1.1 and STATA 16.0. This review included 45 randomized placebo-controlled studies and 27 open-label extension studies. Short-term RRs of serious infection, overall infection and malignancy were 1.45 (95% confidence intervals, 95% CI: 0.81-2.59), 1.20 (95% CI: 1.06-1.35), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.41-1.71) with IL-17 inhibitors; and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.38-1.22), 1.13 (95% CI: 1.00-1.28), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.37-2.04) with IL-23 inhibitors. Increased short-term risks of nasopharyngitis and Candida infection with IL-17 inhibitors were found. Long-term EAIRs of serious infection, overall infection, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), malignancies excluding NMSC, nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection were 1.11/100 patient-years (PYs), 57.78/100PYs, 0.47/100PYs, 0.24/100PYs, 15.07/100PYs, 8.52/100PYs, 3.41/100PYs with IL-17 inhibitors; and 1.09/100PYs, 48.50/100PYs, 0.40/100PYs, 0.43/100PYs, 10.75/100PYs, 5.84/100PYs with IL-23 inhibitors. Long-term EAIR of Candida infection was 3.41/100PYs with IL-17 inhibitors. No active or reactivated tuberculosis was ever reported in all the trials, and only a few cases of latent tuberculosis, hepatitis, and herpes zoster were reported during the long-term extension periods. No evidence of increased EAIRs of infection and malignancy with longer durations was found. Our study suggested that short-term risk and long-term incidence of infections and malignancies in psoriasis patients receiving IL-17 inhibitors and IL-23 inhibitors are generally low. However, close monitoring is required for nasopharyngitis and Candida infection with IL-17 inhibitors.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022363127.

The Role of Regulatory T Cells in the Onset and Progression of Primary Sjögren's Syndrome

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a key role in maintaining immune balance and regulating the loss of self-tolerance mechanisms in various autoimmune diseases, including primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). With the development of pSS primarily in the exocrine glands, lymphocytic infiltration occurs in the early stages, mainly due to activated CD4⁺ T cells. Subsequently, in the absence of rational therapy, patients develop ectopic lymphoid structures and lymphomas. While the suppression of autoactivated CD4⁺ T cells is involved in the pathological process, the main role belongs to Tregs, making them a target for research and possible regenerative therapy. However, the available information about their role in the onset and progression of this disease seems unsystematized and, in certain aspects, controversial. In our review, we aimed to organize the data on the role of Tregs in the pathogenesis of pSS, as well as to discuss possible strategies of cell therapy for this disease. This review provides information on the differentiation, activation, and suppressive functions of Tregs and the role of the FoxP3 protein in these processes. It also highlights data on various subpopulations of Tregs in pSS, their proportion in the peripheral blood and minor salivary glands of patients as well as their role in the development of ectopic lymphoid structures. Our data emphasize the need for further research on Tregs and highlight their potential use as a cell-based therapy.

Innate Immunity and Biological Therapies for the Treatment of Sjögren's Syndrome

Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder affecting approximately 3% of the population in the United States. This disease has a female predilection and affects exocrine glands, including lacrimal and salivary glands. Dry eyes and dry mouths are the most common symptoms due to the loss of salivary and lacrimal gland function. Symptoms become more severe in secondary SS, where SS is present along with other autoimmune diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, or rheumatoid arthritis. It is known that aberrant activation of immune cells plays an important role in disease progression, however, the mechanism for these pathological changes in the immune system remains largely unknown. This review highlights the role of different immune cells in disease development, therapeutic treatments, and future strategies that are available to target various immune cells to cure the disease.

Number needed to treat and costs per responder among biologic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefits of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe psoriasis are well established, but wide variations exist in patient response.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve a 75% and 90% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75/90) with FDA-approved agents and evaluate the incremental cost per PASI-75 or PASI-90 responder.

METHODS

The relative probabilities of achieving PASI-75 and PASI-90, as well as NNTs, were estimated using a network meta-analysis. Costs (2017 USD) included drug acquisition and administration. The incremental cost per PASI-75 or PASI-90 responder for each treatment was estimated for the clinical trial period, and annually.

RESULTS

Compared with supportive care, the NNT to achieve PASI-75 was 1.18 for ixekizumab, 1.29 for secukinumab 300 mg, 1.37 for infliximab, 1.48 for adalimumab, 1.53 for secukinumab 150 mg, 1.58 for ustekinumab, 2.25 for etanercept, and 3.71 for apremilast. The one-year incremental cost per PASI-75 responder relative to supportive care was $59,830 for infliximab, $88,775 for secukinumab 300 mg, $91,837 for adalimumab, $95,898 for ixekizumab, $97,363 for ustekinumab, $105,131 for secukinumab 150 mg, $129,665 for apremilast, and $159,328 for etanercept. Results were similar for PASI-90.

CONCLUSION

The NNT and incremental cost per responder are meaningful ways to assess comparative effectiveness and cost effectiveness among psoriasis treatments.

Number needed to treat and costs per responder among biologic treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Japan

BACKGROUND

Biologics have been shown to improve the outcomes of patients with psoriasis but their cost is an issue.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve a 75%/90% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75/90) and evaluate the incremental cost per PASI-75/90 responder (CPR) relative to placebo in Japan.

METHODS

A network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the relative probabilities of achieving PASI-75/90 and NNTs. Drug costs were assessed based on Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Agency-approved dosing. The CPR was estimated for a short-term induction period and first year of treatment.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, the PASI-75 NNT was 1.27 for adalimumab 80 mg, 1.29 for secukinumab 150 mg, 1.36 for secukinumab 300 mg, 1.57 for adalimumab 40 mg, 1.68 for ustekinumab 90 mg, 1.97 for ustekinumab 45 mg and 2.00 for infliximab 5 mg/kg. The short-term PASI-75 CPR relative to placebo was $5,062 for secukinumab 150 mg, $8209 for adalimumab 40 mg, $10,654 for secukinumab 300 mg, $11,754 for adalimumab 80 mg, $15,407 for ustekinumab 45 mg, $19,147 for infliximab 5 mg/kg and $26,257 for ustekinumab 90 mg. A similar ranking was observed for one-year PASI-75 CPRs and PASI-90 NNTs and CPRs.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab 40 mg/80 mg and secukinumab 150 mg/300 mg were the most efficacious and cost-efficient for patients with psoriasis in Japan.

Present and future of biologic drugs in primary Sjögren's syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Primary Sjögren's (pSS) syndrome is a chronic, autoimmune, and systemic disease characterized by xerostomia, xerophthalmia, muscle pain and fatigue. The disease may be complicated by a systemic involvement, such as a pulmonary fibrosis or the development of lymphoma which severely worsens the prognosis. Actually, there are no recommendations for the management of pSS. However, recent advances in the understanding of its pathogenesis have uncovered some pathways that have potential as therapeutic targets. Areas covered: In this review, the authors present the biologic drugs potentially valuable to the treatment of pSS in light of its physiopathology with a 'bird's eye' view of future prospects. The authors took into account relevant studies published from 2004 to 2016. Expert opinion: Biological treatment in pSS is a promising opportunity to potentially control disease activity and prevent its complication. Currently, inhibition of B-cell and IL-17 pathways seem to be the most promising avenues. New achievements in the knowledge of pSS pathophysiology are necessary in order to try to simultaneously predict the predominant pathogenic pathway, the kind of patients at major risk to develop a more severe disease, and the appropriate biological therapy to use.

Comparative efficacy and incremental cost per responder of methotrexate versus apremilast for methotrexate-naïve patients with psoriasis

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, no clinical trials directly compare apremilast with methotrexate (the standard of care for initial systemic treatment of psoriasis).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare apremilast's relative efficacy with that of methotrexate for moderate to severe psoriasis.

METHODS

An anchor-based indirect comparison was conducted for 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score from baseline to week 16 (PASI 75) rates for systemic-naïve patients from Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of apreMilast in psoriasis (ESTEEM) 1 and 2 (apremilast vs placebo) and Comparative study of HumirA vs. Methotrexate vs Placebo In psOriasis patieNts (CHAMPION) (adalimumab vs methotrexate vs placebo) trials. The difference-in-difference in PASI 75 response rates was calculated as the difference between the ESTEEM apremilast and placebo rates and the CHAMPION methotrexate versus placebo rates. Number needed to treat and incremental drug cost per responder were also estimated.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between apremilast and methotrexate in PASI 75 (risk difference 13.1%; 95% confidence interval -1.8% to 28.0%; P = .09). Number needed to treat with apremilast versus methotrexate to gain 1 additional PASI 75 responder was 7.6. Annual incremental drug cost of this responder was estimated at $187,888.33.

LIMITATIONS

Few trials compare systemic-naïve patients. Only direct medication costs were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistical evidence of greater efficacy for apremilast versus methotrexate. The $187,888 incremental cost per PASI 75 may exceed what payers are willing to pay.

Itolizumab provides sustained remission in plaque psoriasis: a 5-year follow-up experience

There is an unmet need for psoriasis therapies that provide long-term remission. Itolizumab is a humanized recombinant anti-CD6 monoclonal antibody shown to be effective in psoriasis. We report a patient who received itolizumab in a phase 2 clinical trial, and experienced long-term remission. At baseline, the patient's Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was 12.2, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score was 3. After 8 weeks of treatment, the patient achieved 97% improvement in PASI. She continued to have ≥ 90% improvement, initially for 4 weeks (follow-up phase), and later for 20 weeks (follow-up extension phase). She continued to visit the hospital after the final study visit; her most recent visit was on 10 May 2013. PGA results during the visits revealed sustained response for 4 years and 5 months after stopping itolizumab. Itolizumab could be therefore an important treatment option for moderate to severe psoriasis, with potential to provide long-lasting remission.

The efficacy of a health-related quality-of-life intervention during 48 weeks of biologic treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Interest in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcome research in dermatology is increasing, especially in the systemic treatment of psoriasis with biologic agents. In other specialties, such as oncology, the application of a HRQoL intervention is considered to be an aid for monitoring disease and treatment over time, for the communication with the patient, and for improving treatment outcome. However, in dermatology practice, the application of this intervention is relatively new. Moreover, evidence on the effectiveness of a HRQoL intervention in dermatology is missing. It is hypothesized that the application of a HRQoL intervention in dermatology practice will have a positive impact on patients' HRQoL as well as on doctor-patient communication.

METHODS/DESIGN

In a prospective multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial, patients diagnosed with moderate to severe psoriasis who receive biologic treatment, will be followed for 48 weeks. The study sites, and not the patients, will be randomly allocated via a computer-based randomization system to either the intervention (treatment with etanercept and standardized HRQoL assessment and communication) or the control group (treatment with etanercept alone). The HRQoL intervention will include 1) the electronic assessment of the Skindex-29, a well-studied dermatology-specific HRQoL questionnaire, and 2) the communication of the resulting Skindex-29 data with the patient. Prior to study start, dermatologists in the intervention group will be educated and trained in standardized HRQoL assessment and communication using the Skindex-29. At six consecutive visits, patients at study sites in the intervention group will be asked to complete the Skindex-29 on a desk-top pc at the clinic, just before their consultation with the dermatologist. A print-out of the completed questionnaire will be made and, guided by this print-out, feedback on the HRQoL scores will be given during the consultation. Primary outcome parameters are the impact of the HRQoL intervention on patients' HRQoL, and the effect of the HRQoL intervention on doctor-patient communication. Secondary outcomes include health status and disease severity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR): NTR1364.

Clinical and Therapeutic Evaluation of Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis in Spain: The Secuence Study

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of disease severity is considered essential in the optimal management of psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical characteristics and therapeutic profile of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis in Spain and to assess the impact of the disease on the patients' quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional study carried out in 90 dermatology units in Spain in 2009. We included 442 patients diagnosed with moderate to severe psoriasis who had started treatment with systemic agents, phototherapy, and/or topical treatments between 2004 and 2006. RESULTS: More severe psoriasis was significantly associated with the following: longer disease duration; higher prevalence of concomitant disease; greater involvement of the nails, scalp, flexures, palms, and soles; and poorer quality of life. In the 5 years before the start of the study, 68% of the patients had received conventional systemic treatments, 39.1% biologic agents, and 22.3% phototherapy. At present, 57.5% of the patients are being treated with biologic agents, 32.6% with conventional systemic treatments, and 11% with phototherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of psoriasis was associated with a marked impact on quality of life. Regardless of disease severity, psychiatric comorbidity was the strongest predictor of poor quality of life. On average, patients had received other treatments, such as conventional systemic treatments or phototherapy, for more than 2 years before switching to biologic agents for the first time.

Ustekinumab: a review of its use in the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis

Ustekinumab (Stelara™) is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the p40 subunit common to both interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23. It is indicated in the US for use in adult patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy. In the EU, it is indicated for those who failed to respond to, have a contraindication to or are intolerant of other systemic therapies or phototherapy. This article reviews the efficacy and tolerability of ustekinumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties. Ustekinumab attenuates the immune cell activation properties of IL-12 and IL-23. It interrupts the abnormal activation of signalling and cytokine cascades that underlie the pathology of psoriasis by reducing the expression of IL-12- and IL-23-induced cell surface markers that mediate skin homing, activation and cytokine release. In well designed, randomized clinical trials, regimens of subcutaneous ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg provided a rapid and durable improvement in psoriasis area severity index (PASI) scores for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving ustekinuman 45 or 90 mg compared with those receiving placebo achieved a ≥75% improvement from baseline in PASI score following 12 weeks' treatment (primary endpoint). Improvements in PASI scores were evident following 2 weeks' treatment with ustekinumab and were sustained for up to 3 years. Treatment with ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg also improved health-related quality-of-life scores from baseline. Following 12 weeks' treatment, ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg was more effective than etanercept 50 mg twice weekly in providing symptomatic relief for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Furthermore, ustekinumab treatment provided effective symptomatic improvement for almost half of the patients who showed no response to 12 weeks' treatment with etanercept. More limited data indicate that ustekinumab also improves the symptoms of arthritis in patients with plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Subcutaneous ustekinumab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; most adverse events were mild in intensity and did not require dosage adjustment. A pooled analysis of clinical trial data indicated no specific patterns of infection for recipients of ustekinumab and that infection rates remained stable following cumulative exposure to the agent. In conclusion, subcutaneous ustekinumab provides an effective and well tolerated alternative for the symptomatic treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Treating psoriasis with adalimumab

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, inflammatory skin disease that can have a significant impact on the quality of life of those who are afflicted. Recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of psoriasis have led to the development of new, genetically engineered, targeted therapies for this disease. Among the most successful strategies for treatment has been the use of biologic immunotherapies targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF). Recent research has evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new anti-TNF agent, adalimumab. Adalimumab is a human monoclonal antibody that is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Recently released data from large, randomized clinical trials suggests that adalimumab has significant efficacy for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis and is well tolerated. Thus, adalimumab seems to be a promising therapeutic approach for patients who suffer from moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Biological drugs targeting the immune response in the therapy of psoriasis

Chronic plaque psoriasis affects more than 2% of world population, has a chronic recurrent behavior, gives a heavy burden to the patients’ quality of life, and hence remains a huge medical and social problem. The clinical results of conventional therapies of psoriasis are not satisfactory. According to the current knowledge of the molecular and cellular basis of psoriasis, it is defined as an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory and hyperproliferative skin disease. A new generation of biological drugs, targeting molecules and cells involved into perturbed pro-inflammatory immune response in the psoriatic skin and joints, has been recently designed and applied clinically. These biological agents are bioengineered proteins such as chimeric and humanized antibodies and fusion proteins. In particular, they comprise the antitumor necrosis factor-α agents etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab, with clinical efficacy in both moderate-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, and the anti-CD11a efalizumab with selective therapeutic action exclusively in the skin. Here, we overview recent findings on the molecular pathways relevant to the inflammatory response in psoriasis and present our clinical experience with the drugs currently employed in the dermatologic manifestations, namely etanercept, infliximab, and efalizumab. The growing body of clinical data on the efficacy and safety of antipsoriasis biological drugs is reviewed as well. Particular focus is given to long-term safety concerns and feasibility of combined therapeutic protocols to ameliorate clinical results.

Adverse events during biological therapy – focusing on dermatological side-effects

Biological response modifiers, especially tumour necrosis factor inhibitors have been proved to be very effective in the treatment of various immune mediated rheumatological, gastroenterological and dermatological diseases in the last 15 years. With their increasing use, the incidence of their adverse effects are more precisely defined. The aim of this cohort study was to analyse the adverse effects occurred within the study period in patients receiving biological therapy for rheumatological and dermatological autoimmune diseases. Methods: 324 patients within a 3 years study period were treated with biological response modifiers (adalimumab: 92, etanercept: 107, infliximab: 125). The primary diagnoses were rheumotoid arthritis (n = 174), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 60), psoriatic arthritis (n = 11), and psoriasis vulgaris (79). Results: Hypersensitive reactions were observed in 11 of the patients (3.4%), 7 of which were serious and needed treatment termination. Infections constituted the majority of side effects, which were localised to skin in 10 (3.1%) and to respiratory tract in 9 (2.8%). However, most of these were mild or moderate reactions. Malignant skin tumour developed in 1 case (0.3%) only. Drug induced inflammatory disorders occurred in some cases: onset of new psoriasis was observed in 1 and flares of the existing disease were detected in additional three. Lichenoid exanthema developed in one. (n = 5, 1.5%) Conclusion: The use of TNF-α blockers may provoke a broad spectrum of dermatological side effects. Our results suggest that the majority of these are infectious and inflammatory disorders, the latter may relatively often appear as drug induced psoriasis. The occurrence of malignancies was very low in our series. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 212–220.

Ustekinumab: an evidence-based review of its effectiveness in the treatment of psoriasis

Introduction:

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting approximately 2% to 3% of the population worldwide. Discoveries over the past 3 to 5 years have significantly altered our view of psoriasis as primarily a T-cell mediated condition. The most recent research has demonstrated the essential role of specific cytokines in the development of this complex disease, including TNF-α, interleukin-23 (IL-23), and potentially, IL-22. These are all part of a newly defined autoimmune pathway directed by specialized T cells called Th17 helper T cells. Ustekinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets IL-12 and IL-23, thus targeting both Th1 and Th17 arms of immunity. It has a promising efficacy and safety profile that not only represents a valuable treatment alternative, but also a continuation in our constantly evolving understanding of this disorder.

Aims:

To review the emerging evidence supporting the use of ustekinumab in the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Evidence review:

There is clear evidence that ustekinumab is effective in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Phase III trials (PHOENIX 1 and 2) demonstrated a statistically significant difference between Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 responses achieved by patients receiving ustekinumab, given as a 45 mg or 90 mg subcutaneous injection every 12 weeks, than their placebo counterparts. Treatment with this novel agent resulted in a rapid onset of action, with over 60% of treated patients attaining Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) scores of “cleared” or “minimal” by week 12. Quality of life assessments paralleled clinical improvements.

Clinical potential:

Ustekinumab is an effective and efficient therapeutic option for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Although further studies are required to establish ustekinumab’s place in the therapy of psoriasis, with its convenient dosing schedule and rapid onset of action, this drug could provide a great addition to the current therapeutic armamentarium available for psoriatic patients.

Immune mechanisms of psoriasis. New strategies of biotherapy

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease - according to numerous studies, about 2% of the population suffer from it. Psoriasis degrades the life quality, and such concomitant pathologies as metabolic disorders, cardiovascular diseases and depression shorten the life expectancy of psoriasis patients. Substantial progress has been achieved today in understanding the mechanisms of the disease, searching for new treatment techniques and standardizing the disease severity According to the recent studies, psoriasis belongs to immune-dependent diseases with genetic predisposition to its development. Dendritic cells and T lymphocytes play an important part in psoriasis development. Their interaction launches a number of mechanisms ultimately leading to the inflammatory process development and formation of psoriatic skin affections. Such cytokines as IL-12, IL-23, IFN-y and TNF-a secreted by immunocompetent cells serve as mediators during such processes. An advanced therapeutic approach to the treatment of psoriasis means creating pathogenetically important cytokine specific monoclonal antibodies and placing them into the body Today there are drugs successfully blocking the development of psoriatic skin affections by means of specific binding of IL-12, IL-23 and TNF-a cytokines. Drugs called ustekinumab and ABT-874 confirmed their therapeutic activity with regard to psoriasis at Phases 2 and 3 of clinical trials. In the course of further trials, ustekinumab also demonstrated a safety profile comparable to that of placebo.

Long-term efficacy of biologics in the treatment of psoriasis: what do we really know?

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition that often requires life-long treatment. Conventional therapies have not fully met the needs of psoriatic patients, because of limited efficacy, adverse effects with cumulative use, and patient inconvenience. In the past decade, biologic immunotherapies have become accepted treatments for psoriasis as a result of perceived efficacy and safety on the part of patients and practitioners. However, most data on these medications come from relatively limited short-term trials. In this review, we will focus on the available long-term data on the efficacy of the biologic agents. We will emphasize the strengths and weakness of the available data of the biologic agents that are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis (alefacept, efalizumab,* etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab), with the inclusion of a newer agent currently under FDA evaluation (ustekinumab).

Humanized anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody treatment of plaque psoriasis: efficacy and pharmacodynamic results of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of intravenous and subcutaneous siplizumab

New biologic therapies focused primarily on cytokine pathways, some targeting T cell-mediated immune responses, are being developed for the treatment of psoriasis. Siplizumab is a humanized anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody that interferes with costimulation necessary for T cell activation and proliferation. We assessed the biological activity, serum concentrations, and pharmacodynamic effects of siplizumab in patients with plaque psoriasis. Two multicenter, phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted: one study randomized 124 patients to one of two intravenous (IV) doses (0.012 and 0.04 mg/kg) of siplizumab, given every 2 weeks x 8 doses; the other study randomized 420 patients to one of three subcutaneous (SC) dose regimens of siplizumab given weekly (5 mg for 12 weeks, 5 mg for 6 weeks, and 7 mg for 4 weeks) or placebo for 12 weeks. Adults with plaque psoriasis involving > or =10% of the body surface area and who were not receiving psoriasis therapy were eligible. Treatment with siplizumab resulted in reductions in psoriasis severity, but most of the effects were not statistically significant compared with placebo. Statistically significant differences among IV siplizumab-treated and placebo groups were observed at study day 28, with greater psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score reductions from baseline in the siplizumab groups. The difference in PASI50 response rates between the 0.04 mg/kg siplizumab and placebo groups was also statistically significant at day 28. A trend toward clinical improvement was observed in SC siplizumab-treated groups. Significant reductions in circulating absolute lymphocyte counts and CD2+ (CD3+, CD8+, and CD16+/56+), but not CD2- (CD19+ and CD14+), lymphocyte populations were observed. These changes were not accompanied by concomitant reductions in infiltrating CD3+ lymphocytes in psoriatic lesions, epidermal thickness, or keratin 16 (K16) and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) expression. The effect of siplizumab did not differentially affect CD45RO+ and CD45RA+ lymphocytes. Low or undetectable mean trough serum concentrations of siplizumab following IV or SC treatment were observed. Pharmacokinetic data coupled with higher-than-expected placebo clinical response rates may partly explain siplizumab's marginal clinical activity. Higher doses of siplizumab may be required to detect significant improvements in psoriasis; however, further development of this agent was not planned.

Practical understanding of mean percent psoriasis area and severity index reduction for biologics

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis in clinical trials is often measured by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). This measurement is well understood by clinical trialists and many dermatologists but rarely by patients and some clinicians. Patients may not understand their chance of improvement based on a PASI-50 or PASI-75 value (50 or 75% improvement in PASI score). They would better understand a PASI average presented as the mean percent improvement in the PASI score from baseline.

OBJECTIVE AND CONCLUSION

This article simplifies these terms of reduction from baseline in PASI scores as related to treatment with biologic agents. This may be more meaningful for patients and clinicians when discussing their average chance of improvement.

Use of biologic therapeutics in difficult-to-treat psoriasis

BACKGROUND

A need for improved psoriasis management drove the development of four biologicals now approved for use in moderate to severe psoriasis: alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, and infliximab.

OBJECTIVE

This review compares the recommended and practical use of biologicals in "difficult-to-treat" psoriasis. Difficult-to-treat patients, a subpopulation of particular interest to caregivers and regulators, are those for whom conventional options are unavailable, contraindicated, intolerable, or ineffective.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite guidance recommending that biologicals be considered among first-line antipsoriasis treatments, formulary inclusion may be influenced by the biologicals' success in controlling difficult-to-treat psoriasis. Findings from the Clinical Experience Acquired with Raptiva (CLEAR) randomized controlled trial (RCT) established efalizumab's equal efficacy in difficult-to-treat and moderate to severe psoriasis. The CLEAR data were cited in support of a regulatory recommendation to include efalizumab in Canadian provincial formularies. For some other biologicals, evidence regarding efficacy in difficult-to-treat psoriasis remains equivocal. Additional RCTs are needed to define appropriate roles for specific biologicals in difficult-to-treat patients.

Long-term efficacy of biologics in dermatology

Chronic dermatologic diseases affect millions of people. The long-term nature of these diseases creates psychological and financial burden as well as substantially impacts patients' quality of life. Biologics, including adalimumab, etanercept, alefacept, efalizumab, and infliximab, are the newest therapeutic agents in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and have been used in a variety of other dermatologic diseases. These agents act relatively quickly and effectively in 12-week clinical trials. Because these agents are used to treat patients for longer than 12 weeks, there is a need to review the safety and efficacy of these agents over longer periods of time. Many levels of evidence are available for biologics including high level of evidence from large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies. This review focuses on the available data for efficacy and safety for greater than 24 weeks of therapy. The studies supporting the use of rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmune blistering diseases are also presented in this review.

Manifestation of palmoplantar pustulosis during or after infliximab therapy for plaque-type psoriasis: report on five cases

Infliximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against TNF-α. It has been approved for use in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis and plaque-type psoriasis. In case reports, positive effects on pustular variants of psoriasis have also been reported. However, paradoxically, manifestation of pustular psoriasis and plaque-type psoriasis has been reported in patients treated with TNF antagonists including infliximab for other indications. Here, we report on 5 patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis who developed palmoplantar pustulosis during or after discontinuation of infliximab therapy. In two of the five cases, manifestation of palmoplantar pustulosis was not accompanied by worsening of plaque-type psoriasis. Possibly, site-specific factors or a differential contribution of immunological processes modulated by TNF inhibitors to palmoplantar pustulosis and plaque-type psoriasis may have played a role.

Autoantibody production in anti-TNF-alpha-treated patients

Targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) has offered an additional therapeutic strategy against several rheumatic inflammatory disorders. The current use of TNF-alpha inhibitors allows physicians who manage these diseases and patients themselves to testify to an extraordinary efficacy, even though caution for possible adverse events must be maintained. Among these, the occurrence of autoimmune phenomena, encompassing new autoantibody formation and triggering of clinical manifestations, continues to be noted in published reports. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding the autoimmune phenomena linked to anti-TNF-alpha therapy in patients with rheumatic inflammatory disorders.

Cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life of alefacept in the treatment of psoriasis

Although alefacept was the first biologic agent approved to treat psoriasis, it is used less frequently than other biologic therapies. Alefacept decreases the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score and enhances the quality of life of patients with psoriasis. Unlike other biologics, alefacept can also induce remission of psoriasis. If reports in Pubmed and the package insert are considered to be surrogates for side effects, alefacept appears to be safer than other biologics. Alefacept can be effective against psoriatic arthritis, especially in combination with methotrexate. The response of psoriatics to alefacept, however, is inconsistent and often incomplete. Alefacept also has the highest cost of any biologic agent as measured by patients achieving PASI-75 and cost per patient achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index Minimal Important Difference. Traditional systemic therapies such as spriatane, ciclosporine, as well as phototherapy and TNF-alpha, possess firmer and superior pharmacoeconomic foundations, although some of these apparent cost-benefit disadvantages may take into account the ability of alefacept to induce remission after cessation of treatment.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and use of infliximab

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) is a key proinflammatory cytokine involved in chronic inflammatory diseases. Infliximab, a chimeric (human-murine) monoclonal IgG1 anti-TNFalpha antibody, is used in the treatment of Crohn's disease (including fistulising disease) and rheumatoid arthritis (in combination with methotrexate) if standard treatments have failed. The indications for infliximab have recently been expanded to include ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and ulcerative colitis. The biological agent infliximab is given by multiple intravenous infusions in a dosage of 3-5 mg/kg (initially at weeks 0, 2 and 6; subsequently in intervals of 4-8 weeks). In controlled trials, clinical response rates of 20-40% have been achieved with such regimens in Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. However, the therapeutic benefits must be balanced against the risks of a variety of severe adverse events (e.g. severe infections including tuberculosis, hepatotoxicity, infusion reactions, serum sickness-like disease and lymphoma). Following single and multiple infusions of infliximab, no relevant differences in median concentration-time profiles have been observed between patients with Crohn's disease, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients with psoriasis. The apparent volume of distribution of the high-molecular-weight infliximab (149.1 kDa) is low (3-6L) and represents the intravascular space. The long persistence in this compartment (elimination half-life 7-12 days, mean residence time 12-17 days) is due to the very low systemic clearance of about 11-15 mL/hour (0.18-0.25 mL/minute). Elimination of infliximab is most probably accomplished through degradation by unspecific proteases. During multiple infusions (every 4-8 weeks), no accumulation was observed, and serum concentrations and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of infliximab increased in proportion to the infused dose, indicating linear pharmacokinetics. Co-medication with methotrexate delayed the decline in the serum concentrations of infliximab. When relating serum concentrations to the clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients with Crohn's disease, it can be assumed that trough concentrations above 1 microg/mL could be used as a kind of therapeutic target. In the future, identification of biomarkers for (non-)response and risk factors for adverse drug reactions would be very helpful. Furthermore, combined biological, pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenomic and clinical studies have not yet been performed and are needed to optimise the therapeutic potential of infliximab, which is currently established as a rescue treatment in refractory patients.