Effects of a three-session skin rejuvenation treatment using stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of non-animal origin on skin elasticity: a pilot study

The efficacy of intradermal hyaluronic acid filler as a skin quality booster: A prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot study

BACKGROUND

The use of "skin boosters" comprised of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers to improve skin quality has gained popularity recently, especially in individuals interested in skin rejuvenation.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intradermal micropuncture injections of HA-based gel filler combined with lidocaine (BYRYZN® SKINBOOSTER HA, ACROSS Co., Ltd., Gangwon-do, Korea).

PATIENTS/METHODS

A prospective, single-arm, open-label pilot study was conducted with study subjects who were aged between 30 and 60 years old and exhibited evidence of skin aging, such as wrinkles and loss of elasticity. They received three injections at 2-week intervals and were followed up for a total of 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty subjects with a mean age of 54.1 years were included. The mean Lemperle wrinkle scale demonstrated a 40% decrease from 2.60 ± 0.60 at baseline to 1.55 ± 0.51 at week 8. The improvement rate was maintained at about 33% until week 12. The average maximum height of the wrinkle (Rz, μm), average skin roughness (Ra, μm), skin elasticity (R2, AU), facial curved length (mm), skin pore size (mm2 ), skin hydration (AU), TEWL (g/hm2 ), and skin glossiness (gloss value, AU) exhibited statistically significant improvements over time compared with the baseline measurements. No serious adverse effects or persistent adverse effects were reported, except for a transient subcutaneous nodule in one subject.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that multiple microinjections of HA-based gel filler for facial skin aging are safe and effective in improving facial skin quality.

Needleless laser injector versus needle injection for skin enhancement and rejuvenation effect of dermal filler

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A needleless laser-induced microjet injector is a novel transdermal drug delivery system that can rapidly inject a very small and precise drug dose into the skin with minimal pain and downtime. In this study, we aimed to compare the laser-induced microjet injection versus needle injection of polylactic acid/hyaluronic acid filler for skin enhancement and rejuvenation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 24-week prospective, single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, split-face study was conducted. The enrolled patients underwent one treatment session of dermal filler injection using a laser-induced microjet injector on one half of the face or a traditional needle injection on the other half of the face. Evaluation was conducted at baseline before treatment and at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

A single treatment of filler injection with a laser-induced microjet injector resulted in similar improvements in skin hydration and elasticity as a single treatment of filler injection by using manual needle injection, with reduced pain, side effects, and decreased treatment time.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser-induced microjet injector enabled not only the application of a controlled dose and filler depth but also even distribution, improved clinical efficacy, reduced pain and side effects, and sufficient time for clinicians to perform treatment.

Anti-Aging and Depigmentation Effect of a Hyaluronic Acid Mechanically Stabilized Complex on Human Skin Explants

Solar radiation and environmental pollutants are factors that cause changes in the skin that trigger skin aging. The objective of the study is to evaluate the rejuvenating effects of a complex formed by hyaluronic acid supplemented with vitamins, amino acids and oligopeptides in explants of human skin. For this, surplus skin samples have been obtained from donors that have been resected and cultivated on slides with membrane inserts. The complex was administered to some skin explants and the percentage of cells with low, medium and high levels of melanin was evaluated as an indicator of the degree of pigmentation. Other skin segments were irradiated with UVA/UVB, then the product was administered on several slides and the levels of collagen, elastin, sulfated GAG and MMP1 were evaluated. The results show that the administration of the complex significantly reduces the percentage of skin cells with a high melanin content by 16%, and that in skin irradiated with UVA/UVB, there is a decrease in the content of collagen, elastin and sulfate GAGs, and the complex reverses this reduction without changing MMP1 levels. This suggests that the compound has anti-aging and depigmentation effects on the skin, giving a skin rejuvenation appearance.

The Effectiveness of Injectable Hyaluronic Acid in the Improvement of the Facial Skin Quality: A Systematic Review

Background

Several studies have evaluated the role of various injectable formulations of hyaluronic acid (HA) in the improvement of the quality of facial skin. It is important to systematically summarize the available evidence in this regard.

Methods

Relevant databases were searched for clinical studies that evaluated the therapeutic role of any injectable formulation of HA in improving the quality of facial skin in adult humans until 31 December 2022. The available studies were critically analyzed and the data were extracted.

Results

A total of 2996 articles were screened and 13 studies were finally included. Eight studies evaluated the effect of various formulations of HA alone, while five evaluated the effect of various formulations of HA along with other active ingredients (cocktails) on the quality of facial skin. All types of HA formulations cause a significant improvement in facial skin quality, in terms of hydration, firmness, skin-tiring effect/fatigue, brightness, texture, radiance, and elasticity. The effect of HA monotherapy was more pronounced than that of the cocktail ingredients. HA treatment was quite safe and the patient satisfaction level was high.

Conclusion

The clinical evidence on the use of injectable HA alone in the improvement of the quality of facial skin, in terms of hydration, firmness, skin-tiring effect/fatigue, brightness, texture, radiance, and elasticity, is quite promising. Large randomized controlled trials are required in this regard.

Employing hyaluronic acid-based mesotherapy for facial rejuvenation

BACKGROUND

Mesotherapy is a method of treatment in which biocompatible substances are injected in small aliquots into different levels of skin. This technique can be used for facial rejuvenation.

AIM

To comprehensively evaluate efficacy of different hyaluronic acid (HA) materials for skin rejuvenation, and discuss longevity of these products, potential adverse effects, and different injection techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Scopus, Web of science, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Science direct until April of 2022. Thirty-four articles were selected including 23 articles about non-cross-linked HA and 11 articles about cross-linked HA.

RESULTS

Eleven and five different non-cross-linked HA and cross-linked HA materials were utilized, respectively. Treatment sessions for non-cross-linked HA were between 1 and 6 at weekly-to-bimonthly interval, and for cross-linked HA were 1-3 at 4-36 weeks apart. In most of the studies, serial micropuncture technique with 23-32 gauge needles was used for injection. Other injection techniques were Nappage (picotage), depot and micro-linear.

CONCLUSION

Mesotherapy with HA-based fillers is a favorable method for restoring youthful appearance, rejuvenation, and revitalization of skin. Proper selection and precise placement of HA in desired level of dermis is an essential key to optimize improvement and minimize side effects including skin irregularities and Tyndall effect. Adjuvant therapy with additional rejuvenation procedures to enhance esthetic results is required especially in elderly individuals with severe photodamaged skin. Moreover, preservation of esthetic results requires maintenance therapy every few months.

Cell-Free Blood Cell Secretome (BCS) Counteracts Skin Aging: Multi-Center Prospective Regenerative Aesthetic Medicine Study Using Exokine®

Background

The “Inflammation Theory of Ageing” identifies pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative damage as one cause of cellular and mitochondrial deterioration and aging. Cell-free blood cell secretome (BCS) also known as autologous conditioned serum (ACS) has shown anti-inflammatory and regenerative mode of action in musculoskeletal disorders and radicular compression.

Aim

To confirm that BCS can improve signs of skin aging from a previous study in a multi-center setting.

Methods

Prospective, one-armed, multi-center interventional therapeutic study. Ninety-five women with skin firmness loss were treated with four intra-dermal injection sessions in both cheeks at 0, 2, 4 and 6 weeks. BCS was processed with Exokine® medical device according to manufacturer’s instructions. Primary endpoints were cutometric R0 and R3 at 12 and 24 weeks. GAIS, FACE-Q^TM, Patient Attractivity Self-Assessment and safety were evaluated.

Results

Mean skin firmness (R0) improved significantly from baseline 0.40 mm to 0.38 mm at week 12 and to 0.36 mm at week 24. Mean skin tiring (R3) improved significantly from baseline 0.45 mm to 0.42 mm at week 12 and to 0.40 at week 24. FACE-Q^TM “Satisfaction with Skin” significantly improved from baseline to weeks 12, 24 and 48. So did “Satisfaction with Facial Appearance” and “Psychological and Social Function”. “Satisfaction with Decision” and “Satisfaction with Outcome” were stable at week 24 and 48. At week 48 patients assessed their age 1.68 years younger vs Baseline. FACE-Q^TM aging appraisal improves from Baseline 52.94 to 65.23 at week 48. GAIS, by both physicians and patients, confirm improvement of skin.

Conclusion

For up to 48 weeks four intra-dermal injections with cell-free BCS increase facial skin firmness and resilience to tiring and patients’ satisfaction with their facial appearance and skin. Patients perceive their face as younger. BCS has the ability to sustainably rejuvenate facial skin safely.

Study Registration

Registration on German clinical trials register: DRKS00013014.

Microinjections with hyaluronic acid in combination with glycerol: How do they influence biophysical viscoelastic skin properties?

BACKGROUND

Skin quality improvement with hyaluronic acid microinjections is increasing as a clinical treatment indication and as a scientific issue. This present study assessed changes in biomechanical viscoelastic skin properties after microinjections with the skin quality booster CPM-HA20G (Belotero Revive).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen subjects have been randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either three treatments (total 3 ml per side) or a single-dose treatment (total 1.5 ml per side) with CPM-HA20G at dermal level into the lower cheeks via microinjections. Treatments were provided 4 weeks apart. Biophysical measurements were performed describing the viscoelastic skin properties and the underlying skin structure. The measurements were performed before injection (week 0) and on follow-up visits 4, 8, 16, 24, and 36 weeks after the last injection treatment.

RESULTS

One (p = 0.028) as well as three (p = 0.003) consecutive treatments with CPM-HA20G improved statistically significant skin firmness (R0). For the multiple-treatment group improved significant differences were observed for skin fatigue (R3; p = 0.007) and skin density (p = 0.017) with stable skin thickness levels (p > 0.05), too. There were zero-to-weak correlations between skin thickness and biomechanical skin properties (R0, r_s  = 0.084; R3, r_s  = 0.093).

CONCLUSION

Overall, microinjections with CPM-HA20G improved biomechanical viscoelastic skin properties with a stronger and more pronounced effect in the multiple-treatment group. The observed changes may explain some of the skin quality improvements observed after treatment with CPM-HA20G.

[Skin quality and ways to improve skin quality]

BACKGROUND

Skin quality has a significant impact on the perception of attractiveness. Procedures to improve skin quality, whose quality is assured, should have sufficiently documented scientific evidence of in vivo and in vitro efficacy and significant effects proven in studies.

OBJECTIVES

This paper will present findings from recent studies and experience of experts on skin quality and treatments to improve skin quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed database search was conducted in February 2021 on the terms skin quality and minimally invasive skin quality improvement procedures. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, resulting in the selection of 30 papers.

RESULTS

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is the most commonly studied agent for skin rejuvenation treatments. The efficacy and safety of the superficially injected HA products are excellently proven on the basis of current data. According to these findings, they ensure an improvement of skin quality without significant volume changes. The skin is hydrated, its elasticity increased, the skin surface smoothened, the complexion (skin redness, glow) improved and fine lines and wrinkles are reduced. They are injected intradermally and have a clinically proven effect duration of up to 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyaluronic acid is outstandingly suitable for deep hydration of the skin, and its effect is long-term and safe. Natural treatment results fulfil the needs of the patients and increase the patient-practitioner relation. Superficially injected HA products are currently the criterion standard to increase skin quality.

The Effects of Subcutaneously Injected Novel Biphasic Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Filler: In Vivo Study

BACKGROUND

Biphasic hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers have been used extensively to improve facial skin. However, in some cases, the skin surface is irregular because of the premature loss of HA solution. We propose a new biphasic filler (G-filler) to overcome this problem by using small particles of HA hydrogel instead of HA solution, which can provide a smooth skin surface and good durability.

METHOD

We evaluated the rheologic properties of G-filler and its physiologic effects after subcutaneous injection in a mouse model by histologic analysis.

RESULTS

The G-filler showed a similar elastic modulus (G') and complex viscosity (η*) as the conventional biphasic filler, but had a higher viscous modulus (G″) than the conventional monophasic filler. The highest material elasticity (tan δ) value and the lowest percentage elasticity value indicate the rheologic properties of G-filler are closer to those of liquids. After subcutaneous injection of G-filler, collagen content (~ 2-fold) and elastin fibers (~ 6.5-fold) were significantly increased at 12 weeks compared to those of the saline group. Fibronectin (~ 2.6-fold) and the laminin-immunolabeled cell number (~ 6-fold) were also significantly increased at 12 weeks. Significant increases in the CD31-immunoreactive cell numbers of the G-filler groups were observed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks (~ 3.7-fold) compared to those of the saline groups. There were no significant differences between the G-filler and saline groups in patterns of skin thickness and inflammatory cell numbers around loading sites.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that the injection of a new biphasic filler with improved rheologic properties can effectively stimulate extracellular matrix production and angiogenesis without safety concerns.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors - www.springer.com/00266 .

Biorevitalization of the skin with skin boosters: Concepts, variables, and limitations

Aging leads to diminished capacity in the functionality of all the skin layers, which in turn leads to a structurally weak and esthetically unappealing skin which is dull, dehydrated, and inelastic. Skin boosters can be defined as biological materials or bio-actives that help or encourage the skin to increase or improve its function. Boosters have been used in treating skin structural changes associated with aging as well as other factors such as corticosteroid-induced skin atrophy. Restoring the loss in skin nourishment and vital components is the concept involved in biorevitalization of the skin. The authors aim to present an update and a short review of skin boosters in this commentary.

Topographic computer analysis for acne scar treatment on face accompanying biopsy study after dermal injection of hydrotoxin mixture

Background

Acne during youth can leave permanent facial scarring. The depressed acne scars can be treated by injection of stabilized hyaluronic acid (S‐HA) into the dermis. Due to the large number of acne scars, manual injection methods are technically difficult and bear high risk of lump formation in the dermis. Therefore, the author designed a specific injection method to solve the two abovementioned problems.

Aims

This research aims to assess the effect of the intradermal injection of S‐HA and aboborulinumtoxinA mixture in the treatment of all types of acne scars.

Materials/Methods

A total of 102 patients who suffered from acne scars were treated with a mixture of S‐HA (Restylane Vital®) and abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport^®). Using an automatic injector, micro‐droplets of the mixture (0.001 cc of S‐HA and 0.125 U abobotulinumtoxinA) were delivered into 1000 intradermal sites on whole face except eyelids. This instrument radically reduced injection amounts per site (0.001 cc), lessened manual operator efforts, and ensured consistent injection depth (from 0.8 to 1.2 mm depending on individual dermal thickness) into the facial dermis. The changes in each depression site of acne scars were evaluated by topographic computer analysis (point roughness), based on the 40 magnification microscopic photographs generated. Depth measurements of each small acne scar point were taken one by one at the exact same point before and after the treatments. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) was measured for improvement of acne scars at 1‐ and 6‐month posttreatment. Additionally, serial histologic examinations of the biopsy specimens evaluated neocollagenesis, neoelastinogenesis, and longevity state of the S‐HA.

Results

A total of 78 patients showed improvements of depressed acne scars in physical examinations, medical photographs, and dermascopic photographs.

Using topographic computer analysis, the average point roughness decreased 27.48% (at 1 month) from 29.042 ± 6.85 (baseline) to 21.05 ± 6.30 µm (P < .0001), corresponding with scar improvements observed in physical examinations, and 3.02 ± 0.66 of GAIS at 1‐month posttreatment. Using an injector allowed the hydrotoxin mixture into the deep dermal layer. Biopsy study proved that the injection depth was exactly in the dermis, and showed evidence of neocollagenesis and neoelastinogenesis. Also, the S‐HA particles remained after 1 year, which proved its longevity of at least 1 year.

Conclusion

The topographic computer analysis using point roughness showed improvement of all subtype acne scars at 1‐month posttreatment. The improvement may have resulted from dermal expansion due to the neocollagenesis and neoelastinogenesis. S‐HA lasted more than 1 year in human dermis.

Effect of mesotherapy with nanochip in the treatment of facial rejuvenation

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of mesotherapy with nanochip for facial rejuvenation.Methods: 24 volunteers with aging skin were treated with a polycomponent formulation - NCTF® BOOST 135 HA for 5 times (once weekly for 3 times and successively biweekly for 2 times). Photographs were taken by VISIA at baseline, and after 1, 4, 10 weeks, while global scores for photoaging (GSP), improvement scores, volunteers' satisfaction, parameters describing the properties of the skin, and adverse effects were assessed during each follow-up period.Results: Total 20 volunteers completed the treatment. Evaluation of the whole face showed that GSP, skin texture (ophthalmic wrinkles, dermal thickness, and intensity of collagen fibers of skin), and skin brightness (Lab value) significantly improved at 4 weeks compared to baseline, while the difference between 4 and 10 weeks was not statistically significant. No evident improvement was observed in pigmented spots, telangiectasia, skin tightening, trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL), and skin hydration. Slight erythema, pain was the most common side effect.Conclusion: Mesotherapy with nanochip can improve skin texture and brightness, but the effect is not permanent. It is recommended that the treatment be used as a complementary method for patients with facial rejuvenation needs.

Facial skin revitalization with CPM®-HA20G: an effective and safe early intervention treatment

Background

Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are popular for the treatment of signs of facial skin aging.

Objective

The objective of this study was to confirm the performance and safety of a new cohesive polydensified matrix HA filler ([CPM^®-HA20G, Belotero Revive^®, lidocaine-free], Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany) for the treatment of early signs of facial skin aging by use of biophysical measurements as well as subject and investigator satisfaction.

Methods

Twenty-five healthy female subjects with signs of facial skin aging were enrolled in this open-label, rater-blinded, observational post-market clinical follow-up study, and received 20 micropuncture treatments of 50 µL CPM^®-HA20G each into the lower cheek area at three injection visits 4 weeks apart. Objective biophysical assessments were conducted to demonstrate effects on viscoelastic properties of the skin, surface roughness, tone and radiance, and hydration, at baseline and at all follow-up visits up to 36 weeks.

Results

CPM^®-HA20G significantly increased gross elasticity of the skin (at weeks 9 and 12), skin firmness (up to week 24), skin tone and radiance and skin hydration (all up to 36 weeks). Significant reduction of skin fatigue (up to 9 weeks), skin roughness (up to 28 weeks), and redness (up to 36 weeks) was also observed. Subjects and blinded investigator were highly satisfied with the treatment outcomes. The treating investigator reported a high level of satisfaction with the ease of injection and the clinical performance of the device. Moreover, data demonstrated a good safety profile of the device.

Conclusion

CPM^®-HA20G is considered to be an effective and safe HA injectable for skin revitalization in patients suffering from signs of skin aging and loss of skin elasticity. It seems to be a perfect early intervention approach in patients that do not need volumizing treatment and a combination approach in older patients with more pronounced aging.

Consensus Recommendations for Optimal Augmentation of the Asian Face with Hyaluronic Acid and Calcium Hydroxylapatite Fillers

BACKGROUND

Although the use of filling agents for soft-tissue augmentation has increased worldwide, most consensus statements do not distinguish between ethnic populations. There are, however, significant differences between Caucasian and Asian faces, reflecting not only cultural disparities, but also distinctive treatment goals. Unlike aesthetic patients in the West, who usually seek to improve the signs of aging, Asian patients are younger and request a broader range of indications.

METHODS

Members of the Asia-Pacific Consensus group-comprising specialists from the fields of dermatology, plastic surgery, anatomy, and clinical epidemiology-convened to develop consensus recommendations for Asians based on their own experience using cohesive polydensified matrix, hyaluronic acid, and calcium hydroxylapatite fillers.

RESULTS

The Asian face demonstrates differences in facial structure and cosmetic ideals. Improving the forward projection of the "T zone" (i.e., forehead, nose, cheeks, and chin) forms the basis of a safe and effective panfacial approach to the Asian face. Successful augmentation may be achieved with both (1) high- and low-viscosity cohesive polydensified matrix/hyaluronic acid and (2) calcium hydroxylapatite for most indications, although some constraints apply.

CONCLUSION

The Asia-Pacific Consensus recommendations are the first developed specifically for the use of fillers in Asian populations.

CLINCIAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Bio-Revitalization: Effects of NASHA on Genes Involving Tissue Remodeling

BACKGROUND

The "non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid" (NASHA) is a widely used product in bio-revitalization injective procedures in esthetic medicine. The present research aimed to quantitatively evaluate the therapeutic effect of one of the more used bio-revitalization products on cultured dermal fibroblasts. RT-PCR was used for gene expression profiling of some proteins known to be relevant in skin homeostasis.

METHODS

Human dermal fibroblasts were seeded on a culture medium enriched with a product for dermal bio-revitalization, consisting of stabilized hyaluronic acid gel 20 mg/ml. After 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure, the cDNA was amplified by real-time PCR. Gene expression was quantified with the delta/delta calculation method.

RESULTS

In this study, the gene of metalloproteinase (MMP)-13 is strongly expressed after NASHA incubation. The MMP-2 encoding gene instead is less expressed, but both evidence the same temporal trend, being progressively up-regulated after 24 and 48 h, thereafter the expression decreases, whereas MMP-3 maintains the same up-regulation at 72 h. Hyaluronan synthase 1 and desmoplakin are progressively up-regulated and increase at 24, 48, and 72 h. Hyaluronidase 1 and neutrophil elastase genes are overexpressed, but at 72 h they both exhibit the same behavior as the other degradative enzymes MMP-13 and MMP-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin bio-revitalization by injecting the tested NASHA gel produces an enhancement in the expression of some genes involved in extracellular matrix degradation and organization. In this study, a time-dependent behavior, different for genes encoding degradative compared to synthesis proteins, was demonstrated.

Clinical and biometrological efficacy of a hyaluronic acid-based mesotherapy product: a randomised controlled study

Data demonstrating the efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based mesotherapy for skin rejuvenation are scarce. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of non-reticulated HA-based mesotherapy on skin elasticity and complexion radiance. 55 women with cutaneous ageing signs included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) population blindly received intradermal micro-injections (50 × 0.02 mL) of non-cross-linked HA filler with mannitol (Glytone 1, HA concentration: 14 mg/g) in one cheek and saline physiological solution in the other according to hemifacial randomisation in 3 monthly sessions. Elasticity (E1 and E2 stiffness parameters) and dermis thickness were measured by cutometry and 20 MHz echography, before (D0) treatment and 1 (1M) and 3 months (3M) after the last injection. A trained panel blindly scored skin complexion radiance from standardised and calibrated photographs, using 100 mm analogue scales. In the FAS population, only HA filler significantly decreased E1 at 1M (−10.9 %, p = 0.026) and 3M (−10.5 %, p = 0.035) compared with D0; its effect versus the control tended to be more persistent, with a difference between treatments at 3M close to significance (p = 0.063). E2 also decreased at 1M (−8.2 %, p = 0.027 in the per protocol population, n = 53) and 3M after HA-treatment only. Dermis thickness significantly increased after HA-treatment at 1M (+3.4 %, p = 0.028) and 3M (+4 %, p = 0.008), and after control-treatment at 1M only (+2.5 %, p = 0.015). The HA filler significantly improved complexion radiance at 3M compared with the control (p = 0.012) and for 51 % of subjects, their skin status. Non-reticulated HA-based mesotherapy significantly and sustainably improves skin elasticity and complexion radiance.

A Study on the Alterations in Skin Viscoelasticity before and after an Intradermal Administration of Growth Factor

Background:

While photo-aging is believed to be preventable by the complete blockage of ultraviolet rays, there is no epoch-making method except sing fillers or autologous fat injection, for rejuvenating the skin once it has aged.

Objective:

Our group developed a new method for rejuvenating aged skin by the direct intradermal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor, the first method of its kind in the world. In this paper we report the results of long-term follow-up observations and alterations in skin viscoelasticity before and after this treatment.

Materials and Methods:

A single dose of growth factor was injected directly into aged skin of the dorsal surface of the hand intradermally. The skin viscoelasticity of 50 treated cases was measured by a cutometer just before the treatment and at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment, respectively.

Results:

We observed the following rejuvenating effects: improved skin softness, gradual improvement of turgor, improved thickness of atrophied skin, and greatly improved viscoelasticity which reveals the improvement of biomechanical properties of the treated aged skin. According to the comparisons of viscoelasticity between pre- and post-treatment, the rejuvenated changes of R2 and R7 values were comparable to an age difference of more than 20 years.

Conclusion:

This method was confirmed to have excellent effects in rejuvenating aged skin safely and reliably including biomechanical properties. With this advance, we expect conventional non-physiological skin rejuvenating treatments to be replaced by a much more fundamental method using one-time injections of the growth factor.

Neck skin rejuvenation: histological and clinical changes after combined therapy with a fractional non-ablative laser and stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of non-animal origin

BACKGROUND

The laser Affirm™ (LA) is a microthermal, non-ablative fractional laser used for skin rejuvenation. Restylane Vital™ Light (RVL) in the Restylane® Injector, a formulation of stabilized hyaluronic acid-based gel of non-animal origin, is indicated for rejuvenation of delicate skin.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the interaction between the LA and RVL in aging skin of the neck using clinical and histological parameters, and to determine whether combined therapy is effective.

METHODS

Nine female patients aged 42-62 years received four treatments, each comprising RVL followed immediately by LA treatment. Photographs and skin biopsies were taken before treatment, after the fourth session and 1 month later.

RESULTS

Improvements in fine wrinkles, tightness and skin texture were observed. Histologic evaluations showed favourable changes in cellularity, collagen and elastic fibres. Laser-induced effects (400 μm) and an inflammatory reaction (1000 μm) were seen. RVL was present at the mid-deep dermis (1000-1500 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined treatment with the LA and RVL improved skin appearance and structure as assessed, for the first time, with histology. The LA produced epidermal and superficial dermal changes whereas RVL acted deeper, together treating the full skin thickness.