Evaluation of secondary causes that may lead to bone loss in women with osteoporosis: a retrospective study

The value of hypercalciuria in patients with osteopenia versus osteoporosis

The aim of this study was to analyze the presence of lithogenic metabolic factors in the blood and urine of patients with osteopenia versus osteoporosis. This is a cross-sectional study including 67 patients who were divided into two groups according to the presence of either osteopenia or osteoporosis as measured by bone densitometry: group 1-40 patients with osteopenia (22 men and 18 women) and group 2-27 patients with osteoporosis (13 men and 14 women). Metabolic studies were performed on the blood and urine; statistical analysis was performed comparing means and conducting linear correlation and multivariate analyses with SPSS. Statistical significance was considered to be p ≤ 0.05. The mean age of patients in group 1 was 52.9 ± 12.8 years versus 50.3 ± 11.4 in group 2; the difference was not statistically significant. In group 2, higher levels of osteocalcin, β-crosslaps, urinary calcium, fasting urine calcium/creatinine, 24 h urine calcium/creatinine and 24 h oxaluria were observed compared to group 1. In the multivariate analysis, only the β-crosslaps and urinary calcium were independently associated with osteoporosis. It would be advisable to determine the urinary calcium levels in patients with osteoporosis since altered levels may necessitate modifying the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to osteoporosis.

Prevalence of subclinical contributors to low bone mineral density and/or fragility fracture

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of subclinical contributors to low bone mineral density (BMD) and/or fragility fracture is debated. We evaluated the prevalence of subclinical contributors to low BMD and/or fragility fracture in the presence of normal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHVitD) levels.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

Among 1095 consecutive outpatients evaluated for low BMD and/or fragility fractures, 602 (563 females, age 65.4±10.0 years) with apparent primary osteoporosis were enrolled. A general chemistry profile, phosphate, 25OHVitD, cortisol after 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test, antitissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibodies and testosterone (in males) were performed. Serum and urinary calcium and parathyroid hormone levels were also evaluated after 25OHVitD levels normalization. Vertebral deformities were assessed by radiograph.

RESULTS

In total, 70.8% of patients had low 25OHVitD levels. Additional subclinical contributors to low BMD and/or fragility fracture were diagnosed in 45% of patients, with idiopathic hypercalciuria (IH, 34.1%) and primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT, 4.5%) being the most frequent contributors, apart from hypovitaminosis D. Furthermore, 33.2% of IH and 18.5% of PHPT patients were diagnosed only after 25OHVitD levels normalization. The subclinical contributors to low BMD and/or fragility fracture besides hypovitaminosis D were associated inversely with age (odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% CI 1-1.04, P=0.04) and BMI (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.05-1.17, P=0.0001) and directly with fragility fractures (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.31-2.73, P=0.001), regardless of BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical contributors to low BMD and/or fragility fracture besides hypovitaminosis D are present in more than 40% of the subjects with apparent primary osteoporosis. Hypovitaminosis D masks a substantial proportion of IH and PHPT patients.

Secondary osteoporosis in men and women: clinical challenge of an unresolved issue

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and etiological factors of osteoporosis. We also tested the FRAX algorithm to compare the assessment of fracture risk in patients with primary or secondary osteoporosis.

METHODS

A prospective study carried out in a large sample of 123 men and 246 women. All subjects had a biochemical, densitometric, and radiological examination of thoracic and lumbar spine.

RESULTS

The prevalence of primary (men 52.9% vs women 50%; p = nonsignificant) and secondary (men 21.1% vs women 17.5%; p = nonsignificant) osteoporosis did not differ between the sexes. In contrast, the prevalence of primary osteoporosis was significantly higher than secondary causes (p < 0.0001) in both men and women. While women came to our attention for prevention of osteoporosis, men sought help because of clinical symptoms or disease-related complications, such as fractures. As evaluated by the FRAX tool, patients with osteopenia do not need treatment, in agreement with Italian guidelines. The estimated risk of major osteoporotic and hip fractures was significantly higher in women with secondary osteoporosis compared to men and also compared to women with primary osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of secondary osteoporosis in men is similar to that in women and it is less frequent than commonly reported. In patients with secondary osteoporosis, FRAX calculation may provide an estimate of a particularly high fracture risk in patients whose bone fragility is usually attributed to another disease.

Markers of autoimmune liver diseases in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a common complication of chronic liver diseases. However, there is limited information about autoimmune liver diseases as a factor of secondary osteoporosis. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the autoantibodies of autoimmune liver diseases in patients with osteoporosis.

METHODS

One hundred fifty female patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis were included. Bone mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. We analysized autoantibodies including antinuclear antibodies, liver membrane antibodies, anti-liver/kidney microsomal autoantibodies1, liver-specific protein, antismooth muscle antibodies, and anti-mitochondrial antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence. Serum was assayed for the levels of aminotransferases.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 63,13 ± 8,6 years. The mean values of L1-L4 T-scores and femur total T-scores were -3,08 ± 0,58 and -1,53 ± 0,81, respectively. Among the 150 patients with osteoporosis, 14 (9.3%) were antinuclear antibodies, four (2.7%) were liver membrane antibodies, three (2.0%) were anti-liver/kidney microsomal autoantibodies1, and two (1.3%) were liver-specific protein positive. None of the patients had anti-mitochondrial antibodies or smooth muscle antibodies positivity. The mean values of levels of aminotransferases were within normal range.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of liver membrane antibodies, liver-specific protein, and anti-liver/kidney microsomal autoantibodies1 has permitted us to see that there may be some suspicious clues of autoimmune liver diseases in patients with osteoporosis as a secondary risk factor. On the other hand, there is a need for comprehensive studies with a larger sample size and studies designed to compare the results with a normal population to understand the clinical importance of our findings.