Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with unresectable, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a single centre experience

Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction

Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has remained the only treatment of ovarian cancer with survival advantage since its development in the 1970s. However, survival advantage is only observed in patients who are optimally resected. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative for patients in whom optimal resection is unlikely and/or patients with comorbidities at high risk for perioperative complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence to date for PDS and NACT in the treatment of stage III/IV ovarian carcinoma. We systematically searched the PubMed database for relevant articles. Prior to 2010, NACT was reserved for non-surgical candidates. After publication of EORTC 55971, the first randomized trial demonstrating non-inferiority of NACT followed by interval debulking surgery, NACT was considered in a wider breadth of patients. Since EORTC 55971, 3 randomized trials-CHORUS, JCOG0602, and SCORPION-have studied NACT versus PDS. While CHORUS supported EORTC 55971, JCOG0602 failed to demonstrate non-inferiority and SCORPION failed to demonstrate superiority of NACT. Despite conflicting data, a subset of patients would benefit from NACT while preserving survival including poor surgical candidates and inoperable disease. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the role of NACT.

Overall Survival and Related Factors of Advanced-stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients Underwent Debulking Surgery in Jakarta, Indonesia: A Single-center Experience

AIM: The worrisome prognosis of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) needs a new perspective from developing countries. Thus, we attempted to study the 5-year overall survival (OS) of advanced-stage EOC patients who underwent debulking surgery in an Indonesian tertiary hospital. METHODS: A retrospective study recruited forty-eight subjects between 2013 and 2015. We conducted multiple logistic regression analyses to predict risk factors leading to unwanted disease outcomes. The OS was evaluated through the Kaplan–Meier curve and Log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression examined prognostic factors of patients. RESULTS: Prominent characteristics of our patients were middle age (mean: 51.9 ± 8.9 years), obese, with normal menarche onset, multiparous, not using contraception, premenopausal, with serous EOC, and FIGO stage IIIC. The subjects mainly underwent primary debulking surgery (66.8%), with 47.9% of all individuals acquiring optimal results, 77.1% of patients treated had the residual disease (RD), and 52.1% got adjuvant chemotherapy. The risk factor for serous EOC was menopause (odds ratio [OR] = 4.82). The predictors of suboptimal surgery were serous EOC (OR = 8.25) and FIGO stage IV (OR = 11.13). The different OS and median survival were observed exclusively in RD, making it an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio = 3.50). 5-year A five year OS and median survival for patients with advanced-stage EOC who underwent debulking surgery was 37.5% and 32 months, respectively. Optimal versus suboptimal debulking surgery yielded OS 43.5% versus 32% and median survival of 39 versus 29 months. Both optimal and suboptimal debulking surgery followed with chemotherapy demonstrated an OS 40% lower than those not administered (46.2% and 20%, respectively). The highest 5-year OS was in serous EOC (50%). Meanwhile, the most extended median survival was with mucinous EOC (45 months). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy following optimal and suboptimal debulking surgery has the best OS among approaches researched in this study. RD is a significant prognostic factor among advanced-stage EOC. Suboptimal surgery outcomes can be predicted by stage and histological subtype.

Red blood cell transfusions and the survival in patients with cancer undergoing curative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Allogenic red blood cell transfusions exert a potential detrimental effect on the survival when delivered to cancer patients undergoing surgery with curative intent. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between perioperative allogenic red blood cell transfusions and risk of death as well as relapse after surgery for localized solid tumors. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2019 for studies reporting the outcome of patients receiving transfusions during radical surgery for non-metastatic cancer. Risk of death and relapse were pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval [hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval {CI})]. Mortality and relapse associated with perioperative transfusion due to cancer surgery were evaluated among participants (n = 123 studies). Overall, RBC transfusions were associated with an increased risk of death [HR = 1.50 (95% CI 1.42-1.57), p < 0.01] and relapse [HR = 1.36 (95% CI 1.26-1.46), p < 0.01]. The survival was reduced even in cancer at early stages [HR = 1.45 (1.36-1.55), p < 0.01]. In cancer patients undergoing surgery, red blood cell transfusions reduced the survival and increased the risk of relapse. Transfusions based on patients' blood management policy should be performed by applying a more restrictive policy, and the planned preoperative administration of iron, if necessary, should be pursued.

Infection, thrombosis, and oncologic outcome after interval debulking surgery: Does perioperative blood transfusion matter?

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether perioperative red blood cell transfusion (PRBCT) affects infection, thrombosis, or survival rates in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS).

METHODS

Demographics, operative characteristics, and outcome data were abstracted from records of stage IIIC-IV EOC patients managed with NACT-IDS from 01/2010-07/2015. Associations of PRBCT with morbidity and oncologic outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 270 patients, 136 (50.4%) received PRBCT. Patients with preoperative anemia and higher estimated blood loss (EBL) were more likely to undergo PRBCT (OR,95%CI 1.80, 1.02-3.17) and (OR,95%CI 1.00, 1.002-1.004), respectively. There were no significant differences in PRBCT based on patient age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or stage. When compared to low complexity operations, patients with moderate and high complexity surgeries were more likely to receive PRBCT (OR,95%CI 1.81, 1.05-3.09) and (OR,95%CI 2.25, 1.13-4.50), respectively. On univariate analysis, PRBCT was associated with intraabdominal infection (OR,95%CI 8.31, 1.03-67.41), but not wound complications (OR,95%CI 1.57, 0.76-3.23) or venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism (VTE/PE) (OR,95%CI 2.02, 0.49-8.23). After adjusting for surgical complexity and preoperative anemia, PRBCT was not independently associated with intraabdominal infection (OR,95%CI 7.66, 0.92-63.66), wound complications (OR,95%CI 1.70, 0.80-3.64), or VTE/PE (OR,95%CI 2.15, 0.51-9.09). When comparing patients undergoing PRBCT versus those who did not, there were no significant differences in median progression-free survival (PFS) or median overall survival (OS) on univariate analysis after adjusting for age, stage and residual disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing NACT-IDS, intraabdominal infection, wound complication and VTE/PE rates are similar, regardless of PRBCT. PRBCT does not impact PFS or OS.

Peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion is associated with poor overall survival in advanced epithelial ovarian Cancer; potential impact of patient blood management on Cancer outcomes

BACKGROUND

Transfusion related immune modulation associated with red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is thought to result in decreased cancer survival. Results in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have been mixed however most suggest worse oncologic outcomes in patients who were transfused at the time of debulking surgery. The impact of restrictive transfusion strategies on this patient population is currently not known.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of women with EOC. The study population was divided into two groups based on whether they were transfused RBCs during the peri-operative period or not. Clinical characteristics and prognosticators were compared between groups. Overall survival was compared between groups based on transfusion status and other known prognostic factors. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to examine the association between the prognostic factors and the study endpoint.

RESULTS

Sixty-six percent of women were transfused. Transfusion was associated with CA125, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), surgical blood loss, and anemia. The mean pre-transfusion Hgb was 7.8 + 0.6 g/dL and 94% had a hemoglobin level greater than the transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL. RBC transfusion, suboptimal debulking, anemia, and NACT were associated with decreased survival. Only RBC transfusion and suboptimal debulking status remained significant in a multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-operative RBC transfusion compromises survival in ovarian cancer supporting the need to minimize the use of transfusion at the time of debulking surgery. Adherence to evidence-based transfusion guidelines offers an opportunity to reduce transfusion rates in this population with a resulting positive influence on survival.

Potential risk factors associated with prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in stage IIIc-IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients

AIM

No consensus has been achieved on the prognostic factors for patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for the patients diagnosed as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIc-IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HG-SOC).

METHODS

A total of 200 patients histologically diagnosed as IIIc-IV stage HG-SOC were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent platinum-NAC followed by IDS treatment between January 2003 and December 2013. The potential predictive factors (including preoperative ascites volume, cancer antigen 125 [CA-125] and CA-125 decreasing kinetics, NAC and adjuvant chemotherapy cycle number as well as tumor characteristics) for optimal cytoreduction by IDS and for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

Optimal cytoreduction by IDS was achieved in 78% of HG-SOC patients who underwent NAC. The median number of NAC cycle was 3 (range 1-8). No ascites regression (P < 0.01, odds ratio [OR] = 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-3.69), and worse CA-125 decreasing kinetics (P < 0.01, OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.37-2.93) were independent predictive factors for suboptimal cytoreduction by IDS. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that PFS and OS were independently associated with preoperative ascites (P < 0.01, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.38-3.28 and P < 0.01, HR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.27-4.26, respectively) and CA-125 decreasing kinetics (P = 0.01, HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.18 and P < 0.01, HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.08-1.37, respectively). PFS of patients who underwent more than four NAC cycles was shorter than those of patients who received four or less number of NAC cycles; however, no difference was observed for OS.

CONCLUSION

Ascites regression and CA-125 decreasing kinetics were independently associated with the optimal cytoreduction rate and survival of patients diagnosed with advanced stage HG-SOC and treated with NAC/IDS.

Ovarian cancer patients at high risk of BRCA mutation: the constitutional genetic characterization does not change prognosis

Ovarian neoplasms secondary to germline BRCA mutations had been described to have a more favourable survival. There is only few data concerning the prognosis of non mutated patients presenting clinical features evocative of BRCA alterations. We retrospectively collected data from patients treated in our institution for an invasive ovarian carcinoma between 1995 and 2011. Patients considered at high risk of BRCA mutation were tested for BRCA1/2 germline mutations. We described clinical, pathological and therapeutic features and compared prognosis of BRCA mutation carriers and non-mutated patients. Out of 617 ovarian cancer patients, we identified 104 patients who were considered at high risk of mutation. The 33 mutated patients were more likely to present a personal (33 vs. 10 %, p = 0.003) or a family (42 vs. 24 %, p = 0.06) history of breast/ovarian cancers. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and wild type patients displayed similar prognosis: median progression-free survival (PFS) of 20.9 versus 37.7 months (p = 0.21); median overall survival (OS) of 151.2 versus 122.5 months (p = 0.52). Personal history of breast cancer increased both PFS [HR = 0.45 (95CI 0.25-0.81)] and OS [HR = 0.35 (95CI 0.16-0.75)]. In multivariate analysis, this parameter was an independent prognostic feature, whereas the identification of a BRCA1/2 mutation was not. In our cohort, all patients at high risk of BRCA mutation share a similar prognosis, whatever is their germline mutation status. Prognosis seems to be more influenced by clinical history than by germline mutations identification. If it is confirmed in larger and independent series, this result suggests that the hypothesis of other BRCA pathway alterations (BRCAness phenotype) deserves to be deeply explored.

The number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with prognosis of stage IIIc-IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

No consensus exists on the number of chemotherapy cycles to be administered before and after interval debulking surgery (IDS) in patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. The present study aims to explore the optimal number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and post-operation chemotherapy to treat the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIc-IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HG-SOC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 129 IIIc-IV stage HG-SOC cases were retrospectively analyzed. Cases were comprised of patients who underwent NAC followed by IDS and who achieved clinical complete response (CCR) at the end of primary therapy. Patients were recruited from the Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research between 1993 and 2013. Optimal IDS-associated factors were explored with logistic regression. The association between progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) duration, and covariates was assessed by Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank test.

RESULTS

The median number of NAC cycle was 3 (range 1-8). CA-125 decreasing kinetics (p = 0.01) was independently associated with optimal IDS. CA-125 decreasing kinetics, optimal IDS, and NAC cycles was independently associated with OS (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p = 0.03, respectively) and PFS (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p = 0.04, respectively). The PFS of patients who underwent ≥5 NAC cycles was shorter than those of patients who underwent <5 NAC cycles (12.3 versus 17.2 months). The PFS and OS of patients who underwent <5 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy post-IDS were shorter than those of patients who underwent ≥5 cycles (14.2 and 20.3 versus 21.2 and 28.8 months).

CONCLUSION

NAC cycles, CA-125 decreasing kinetics, and optimal debulking are independently associated with the prognosis of patients with advanced stage HG-SOC who underwent NAC/IDS and achieved CCR. The number of administered NAC cycles should not exceed 4.

Recurrence Patterns of Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancers After Complete Cytoreduction During Interval Debulking Surgery

Objectives

Similar to primary debulking surgery, complete resection of all macroscopic diseases during interval debulking surgery (IDS) is the primary objective while using neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by IDS for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers. However, most patients develop recurrent disease even after complete cytoreduction during IDS. This study aims to identify recurrence patterns of the ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in patients who underwent complete cytoreduction during IDS.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with stage III or IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers who were treated at our hospital from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2011.

Results

In this study, 105 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by IDS and achieved complete cytoreduction. The median follow-up period was 42.1 months. Recurrence was documented in 70 patients (66.7%), and 35 (33.3%) showed no evidence of disease. Peritoneal dissemination was the most common recurrence (60.0%) observed. In multivariate analysis, positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.0003) and elevated pre-IDS serum CA125 levels (P = 0.046) were independent risk factors for recurrence.

Conclusions

After complete cytoreduction during IDS in patients with stage III or IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers, positive peritoneal cytology at IDS and elevated pre-IDS CA125 levels are associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence. Positive peritoneal cytology during IDS is a particularly strong predictive factor for poor outcomes in these patients.

Interval debulking surgery in patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the outcome in patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIIC and IV ovarian cancer were assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

67 patients undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS) and ≥ 4 courses of platinum-based NAC were analyzed for survival, perioperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 30 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months, the overall survival (OS) 34 months. The PFS of patients without residual disease (n = 23; 34.3%) was 31 months (p = 0.003), the OS 65 months (p = 0.001). PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients with no residual disease than in patients with 1-10 mm (n = 34; 47.9%) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0001, respectively) residual disease. No survival benefit was seen for patients with 1-10 mm compared to > 1 cm (n = 12; 16.9%) residual disease (PFS p = 0.518; OS p = 0.077). 1 patient (1.4%) died; 12 patients needed interventional treatment or operation (16.9%) within the first 30 days postoperatively. Out of these, 5 patients (7.0%) had residual or lasting disability.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC and IDS are safe and feasible in this series of patients with unfavorable prognosis. IDS does not change the goal of complete cytoreduction and therefore does not compensate for a less radical surgical approach.

New emerging drugs targeting the genomic integrity and replication machinery in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer is a difficult to treat cancer entity with a high relapse rate. After initial surgery and chemotherapy, only a few options for therapeutic treatment remain in case of cancer recurrence. New treatment options with improved efficacies to circumvent acquired or pre-existing drug resistance are needed.

MATERIALS

This survey focuses on new prospective drugs for ovarian cancer treatment that either cause direct damage to the nuclear DNA or inhibit chromosome segregation by acting as mitotic spindle inhibitors.

RESULTS

Among a plethora of currently tested and proposed new drugs for ovarian cancer treatment, only a few appear to meet the criteria of sufficient and reliable efficacy with tolerable toxicity. These include the naturally occurring DNA-alkylating alkaloid trabectedin, the nitrogen mustard prodrug canfosfamide, and the synthetic kinase inhibitor ON-01910. The latter inhibits mitotic spindle formation without a direct tubulin interaction, avoiding adverse neurotoxic reactions common to the taxanes. Further, epothilones and oxaliplatin, already approved drugs for other cancer entities, show promising activity against ovarian cancer; they are even of interest as a first-line treatment option.

DISCUSSION

Although the current focus and interest of modern cancer drug design tends to be more specific and targeted therapies, including therapeutic antibodies and specific small molecules to inhibit growth-, apoptosis-, and angiogenesis-regulating signalling cascades, the main target for ovarian cancer treatment appears to remain its basic, though uncontrolled working proliferation machinery. This includes the current gold standard for ovarian cancer chemotherapy, carboplatin, and taxanes, as well as the few remaining alternatives, such as topotecan, doxorubicin, and gemcitabine, which all rely on their ability to bind to or to modify the DNA or the chromosome-separating spindle apparatus. Thus, the genomic integrity and replication machinery of ovarian cancer cells prove to represent an established, and obviously still effective target to be tackled for ovarian cancer treatment.