Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies: evaluation of the surgical approach and outcomes over a seven-year experience

Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Oncology-Significance of Anatomical Variations

Pelvic lymphadenectomy is a common surgical procedure in gynecologic oncology. Pelvic lymph node dissection is performed for all types of gynecological malignancies to evaluate the extent of a disease and facilitate further treatment planning. Most studies examine the lymphatic spread, the prognostic, and therapeutic significance of the lymph nodes. However, there are very few studies describing the possible surgical approaches and the anatomical variations. Moreover, a correlation between anatomical variations and lymphadenectomy in the pelvic region has never been discussed in medical literature. The present article aims to expand the limited knowledge of the anatomical variations in the pelvis. Anatomical variations of the ureters, pelvic vessels, and nerves and their significance to pelvic lymphadenectomy are summarized, explained, and illustrated. Surgeons should be familiar with pelvic anatomy and its variations to safely perform a pelvic lymphadenectomy. Learning the proper lymphadenectomy technique relating to anatomical landmarks and variations may decrease morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, accurate description and analysis of the majority of pelvic anatomical variations may impact not only gynecological surgery, but also spinal surgery, urology, and orthopedics.

Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: Technique and surgical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection is an important part of staging surgery. Aim of this study is to evaluate perioperative outcomes of patients, who underwent laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gynecological cancer in a single center over a period of 7 years, based on body mass index (BMI), and to present the surgical technique in steps.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy at gynecological oncology department of a tertiary center in between March 2013 and July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were evaluated in two groups according to their BMI (< 30 kg/m² as non-obese and ≥ 30 kg/m² as obese groups). Surgical technique is described in steps. Perioperative outcomes of the two groups were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients were included in the study. BMI was ≥30 at 58.46 % of the patients. Peri-operative features were not significantly affected by the patient's BMI with the presented surgical technique, however, collected para-aortic lymph node numbers were higher in the group with BMI < 30, though sufficient number of lymph nodes were achieved in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Although some technical difficulties may be encountered, laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy is feasable in gynecologic oncological surgery independent of BMI. However, surgical experience is important.

Prognostic factors influencing pelvic, extra-pelvic, and intraperitoneal recurrences in lymph node-negative early-stage cervical cancer patients following radical hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic factors influencing pelvic, extra-pelvic, and intraperitonal recurrences and survival in patients with lymph node-negative early-stage cervical cancer treated with abdominal/laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy (ARH/LRH/RRH).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathologic data of 342 patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer (2018 FIGO staging) treated with RH and retroperitonal lymphadenectomy between February 2000 and November 2018. Several clinicopathologic factors such as surgical methods including LRH/RRH-vaginal colpotomy (VC) and LRH/RRH-intracorporeal colpotomy (IC), surgical resection margin, and parametrial/endomyometrial infiltration were selected. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression and logistic regression models were used to determine prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 54 months (range, 6-202 months). In multivariate analysis, positive endomyometrial infiltration (HR, 13.576; 95 % CI, 2.917-63.179; P = 0.001), positive parametrial resection margin (HR, 32.648; 95 % CI, 2.774-384.181; P = 0.006), and LRH/RRH-IC (HR, 4.752; 95 % CI, 1.154-19.578; P = 0.031) were significantly related to overall survival. Six (26.3 %) out of 21 patients with endomyometrial infiltration showed extra-pelvic recurrences associated with lung, liver, and brain. Three (50.0 %) out of 6 patients with positive parametrial margin showed both pelvic and extra-pelvic metastases, such as pelvis and supraclavicular/paratracheal lymph nodes. Five (62.5 %) out of the eight relapsed patients who received LRH/RRH-IC showed intraperitoneal recurrences including omentum, liver surface, colon serosa, and splenic hilum.

CONCLUSIONS

Three risk factors including parametrial margin, endomyometrial infiltration, and laparoscopic IC appear to be involved in pelvic, extra-pelvic, and intraperitoneal recurrences in node-negative early-stage cervical cancer patients following RH. In particular, endomyometrial infiltration may be one of the strongest independent prognostic factors for extra-pelvic recurrence. Adjuvant systemic therapy may be indicated for lymph node-negative early-stage cervical cancer patients with endomyometrial infiltration.

Systemic Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy to the Left Renal Vein

Background

No large-scale clinical study has been done to show the standard surgical boundary and efficacy of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LPAL).

Objectives

Therfore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and standard surgical boundary of LPAL performed up to the left renal vein level in gynecological malignancies.

Methods

Medical records of 333 patients were retrospectively reviewed. All cases had gynecologic malignancies and had an operation including LPAL by a single surgical team between November 2003 and May 2018.

Results

Three hundred twenty-six patients underwent LPAL as part of their staging, restaging, or debulking surgery. Seven patients with isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence underwent a repeat LPAL. The median age and body mass index were 54 years (range, 28-81 years) and 26.0 kg/m² (range, 20.3-37.2 kg/m²), respectively. The median operating time was 60 minutes (range, 24-135 minutes), and the median number of harvested para-aortic lymph nodes was 12 (range, 6-49). There were 11 cases of complications: 5 of major vessel injuries (3 inferior vena cava, 1 aorta, and 1 common iliac vein), 2 lymphocysts, 2 cases of chylous ascites, a cisterna chyli rupture, and 1 case of ureteric injury. There were 2 conversions to laparotomy: 1 left common iliac vein laceration that needed to be repaired and removal of an enlarged para-aortic lymph node completely.

Conclusion

It is feasible and efficient to perform LPAL to the left renal vein level for women with gynecologic malignancies by well-trained gynecologic oncology surgeons according to our suggested standard surgical boundary.

Learning curve analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for gynecologic oncologists without open counterpart experience

Objective

To evaluate the learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for gynecologic oncologists who underwent residency- and fellowship-training on laparoscopic surgery without previous experience in performing abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 84 patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IB cervical cancer who underwent LRH (Piver type III) between April 2006 and March 2014. The patients were divided into two groups (surgeon A group, 42 patients; surgeon B group, 42 patients) according to the surgeon with or without ARH experience. Clinico-pathologic data were analyzed between the 2 groups. Operating times were analyzed using the cumulative sum technique.

Results

The operating time in surgeon A started at 5 to 10 standard deviations of mean operating time and afterward steeply decreased with operative experience (Pearson correlation coefficient=-0.508, P=0.001). Surgeon B, however, showed a gentle slope of learning curve within 2 standard deviations of mean operating time (Pearson correlation coefficient=-0.225, P=0.152). Approximately 18 cases for both surgeons were required to achieve surgical proficiency for LRH. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size (>4 cm) was significantly associated with increased operating time (P=0.027; odds ratio, 4.667; 95% confidence interval, 1.187 to 18.352).

Conclusion

After completing the residency- and fellowship-training course on gynecologic laparoscopy, gynecologic oncologists, even without ARH experience, might reach an acceptable level of surgical proficiency in LRH after approximately 20 cases and showed a gentle slope of learning curve, taking less effort to initially perform LRH.

A cohort study evaluating paraaortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer

The current study sought to assess the role of paraaortic lymphadenectomy (LNE) in females with endometrial cancer. A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer of stage IA to II preoperatively, between 2009 and 2011 was conducted. Patients were included who had suffered from endometrial cancer without preoperative adjuvant therapy and who underwent hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic LNE and paraaortic LNE by laparoscopy or laparotomy. A total of 54 patients who underwent surgery for preoperative endometrial cancer were selected. All patients underwent LNE. The incidences of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastases were 11.1% (6/54) and 7.4% (4/54), with a total positive lymph node rate of 14.8% (8/54). In addition, among the 8 positive cases, 5 patients underwent laparotomy and 3 underwent laparoscopy; 3 cases were classified as stage I and 5 as stage II preoperatively. Of these, 7 patients were identified with pathology-related risk factors, including low differentiation or clear cell adenocarcinoma postoperatively. Discordance of pathological differentiation between the pre- and postoperative stages reached 57.1% (4/7). The results revealed the high occurrence of positive lymph nodes in endometrial cancer which demonstrate the importance of systematic LNE. Additonally, no severe complications were caused by LNE besides lymph cysts. In summary, it is neccesary to perform LNE, particularly the removal of the paraaortic lymph node, in patients with endometrial cancers in order to improve postoperative therapy. Laparoscopy has similar surgical effects as laparotomy, but has a number of advantages.

Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?

OBJECTIVES

To determine if laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) can be substituted for radical abdominal hysterectomy for women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of cervical cancer patients who underwent LRH with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy (LPL) and/or laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LPAL) from March 2003 to December 2011.

RESULTS

Of 118 enrolled patients, six were in FIGO stage IA2, 66 were in IB1, 41 were in IB2, one was in IIA1, and four were in IIA2. The median operating time, perioperative hemoglobin change, the number of harvested pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes were 270 min (range, 120-495), 1.7 g/dL (range, 0.1-5), 26 (range, 9-55), and 7 (range, 1-39), respectively. There was no unplanned conversion to laparotomy. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in 16 (13.5%) and 8 (6.7%) patients, respectively. In a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 1-89), 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 90% and 89%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that cervical stromal invasion (P=0.023) and lymph node metastasis (P=0.018) affected survival rate. Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis showed that lymph node metastasis was the only independent factor for poor prognosis (hazard ratio=7.0, P=0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

LRH with LPL and/or LPAL in women with stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer is safe and feasible in terms of survival and morbidity. Our data suggest the need for larger prospective trials which could support this approach as a new standard of care for stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer.