Letrozole ovulation induction: an effective option in endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer

Letrozole ovulation regimen for frozen-thawed embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are usually selected to undergo an ovulation induction regimen or a programmed regimen for endometrial preparation in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) during their IVF/ICSI treatment. The programmed regimen permits flexible scheduling of embryo transfer but requires long-term usage of exogenous estrogen and higher dosages of luteal support while the letrozole ovulation regimen needs lower dosages of luteal support only. Recently, multiple studies have shown that the letrozole ovulation regimen can improve pregnancy outcomes of FET in women with PCOS compared with the programmed regimen. However, most of these studies are retrospective, and prospective studies are urgently needed the evidence from the perspective study is insufficient.

METHODS/DESIGN

We are undertaking a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial of an endometrial preparation regimen for FET in women with PCOS. The eligible women are randomly assigned to either the letrozole ovulation regimen or the programmed regimen for endometrial preparation. The primary outcome is the clinical pregnancy rate.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will provide evidence for whether the letrozole ovulation regimen for endometrial preparation could improve pregnancy outcomes in PCOS women undergoing FET.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200062244. Registered on 31 July 2022.

Effect of different endometrial preparation methods on pregnancy outcome of FET in women with a normal menstrual cycle

Objective

This study aims to explore the relationship between different endometrial preparations and pregnancy outcomes among patients with regular ovulatory cycles in order to find the best endometrial preparation methods in the freeze-thaw embryo transfer (FET) cycle.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective study to investigate FET pregnancy outcomes in women who had a regular menstrual cycle, were younger than 35 years old, and underwent a modified natural cycle (mNC), ovulation induction (OI), or a hormone replacement treatment (HRT) cycle. A total of 1071 frozen cycles were included for analysis.

Results

The implantation rate and live birth rate (LBR) in the OI group show a significant difference when compared to the mNC and HRT groups (P < 0.01). After adjusting for confounding factors, the logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of embryos transferred, the embryo stage, and quality were significantly associated with clinical pregnancy rate and LBR. The LBR was additionally affected by the mode of the endometrial preparation; the OI cycle could increase LBR.

Conclusions

Endometrial preparation methods affect the LBR in women with a regular menstrual cycle. The OI cycle had an advantage in the LBR of FET.

Letrozole During Frozen Embryo Transfer in Women With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare live-birth rates between letrozole application and artificial cycle for endometrium preparation during frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle among women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Women with PCOS were randomized to letrozole application for ovulation induction compared with artificial cycle for endometrial preparation during FET. The primary outcome was live-birth rate per embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy-related outcomes, perinatal outcomes, and maternal complication rates. Assuming α=0.05 and 80% power, 186 patients per group were required to demonstrate a difference of 15% in live-birth rate: 205 patients (at least) per group were randomized to allow for a 10% dropout rate.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty patients were enrolled from 2018 to 2021. Two hundred ten patients were assigned to the letrozole application group, and 210 were assigned to the artificial cycle group. There was no difference in the live-birth rate (42.4% vs 42.9%, P =>.99). There was no difference in secondary outcomes, including clinical pregnancy rate (51.4% vs 56.2%, P =.378), implantation rate (51.8% vs 55.8%, P =.401), and miscarriage rate (8.6% vs 11.0%, P =.511). For perinatal outcomes, singleton birth weight was significantly higher in the artificial cycle group (3,108±56 g vs 3,301±58, P =.018), and the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was significantly higher in letrozole application group (14.6% vs 5.6%, P =.050). The other outcome was no difference in maternal complications.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in pregnancy outcomes between letrozole application compared with artificial cycle for endometrial preparation in women with PCOS who underwent FET. The risk of GDM was higher in the letrozole application group, and the singleton birth weight was lower in the artificial cycle group.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800014746.

Assisted Reproductive Technology and Disease Management in Infertile Women with Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) predominantly affects women of fertile age. Various aspects of MS could impact on fertility, such as sexual dysfunction, endocrine alterations, autoimmune imbalances, and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). The proportion of women with MS (wMS) requesting infertility management and assisted reproductive technology (ART) is increasing over time. In this review, we report on data regarding ART in wMS and address safety issues. We also discuss the clinical aspects to consider when planning a course of treatment for infertility, and provide updated recommendations to guide neurologists in the management of wMS undergoing ART, with the goal of reducing the risk of disease activation after this procedure. According to most studies, there is an increase in relapse rate and magnetic resonance imaging activity after ART. Therefore, to reduce the risk of relapse, ART should be considered in wMS with stable disease. In wMS, especially those with high disease activity, fertility issues should be discussed early as the choice of DMT, and fertility preservation strategies might be proposed in selected cases to ensure both disease control and a safe pregnancy. For patients with stable disease taking DMTs compatible with pregnancy, treatment should not be interrupted before ART. If the ongoing therapy is contraindicated in pregnancy, then it should be switched to a compatible therapy. Prior to beginning fertility treatments in wMS, it would be reasonable to assess vitamin D serum levels, thyroid function and its antibody serum levels; start folic acid supplementation; and ensure smoking and alcohol cessation, adequate sleep, and food hygiene. Cervico-vaginal swabs for Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, and Chlamydia trachomatis, as well as serology for viral hepatitis, HIV, syphilis, and cytomegalovirus, should be performed. Steroids could be administered under specific indications. Although the available data do not clearly show a definite raised relapse risk associated with a specific ART protocol, it seems reasonably safe to prefer the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists for ovarian stimulation. Close clinical and radiological monitoring is reasonably recommended, particularly after hormonal stimulation and in case of pregnancy failure.

Association between duration of progesterone supplementation and clinical outcomes in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

Objective

The administration of progesterone before transfer in hormone replacement treatment (HRT) is crucial for the clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), but the optimal duration of progesterone remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the duration of progesterone administration on the clinical outcomes of FET cycles.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included 353 artificial FET cycles conducted at a reproductive medicine center between April and October 2021. The FET cycles were stratified into four groups based on the duration of progesterone supplementation before the procedure and the embryonic development stage: group P3 (73 patients) received intramuscular progesterone for 3 days and group P4 (87 patients) for 4 days before Day 3 frozen embryo transfer, group P5 (70 patients) for 5 days and group P6 (123 patients) for 6 days before frozen blastocyst transfer. This trial was performed using one or two vitrified embryo(s) when the endometrial thickness reached 7 mm after estrogen supplementation in an artificial cycle. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy, and secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, implantation, early pregnancy loss, and live births.

Results

There were no significant differences in the demographic and clinical characteristics between the groups. No significant difference was observed in the clinical pregnancy rates between groups: 23/73 (31.5%) in group P3 vs 28/87 (32.2%) in group P4 (P = 0.927). Compared to group P5 (41/70, 58.6%), the clinical pregnancy rate was not significantly different in group P6 (77/123, 62.6%, P = 0.753). There was no significant difference in the implantation rates between groups: 33/136 (24.3%) in group P3 vs 34/166 (20.5%) in group P4 (P = 0.431), and 62/133 (46.6%) in group P5 vs 107/231 (46.3%) in group P6 (P = 0.956). The duration of progesterone supplementation (mean: 3.5 ± 0.5 days; range:3-4 days) before Day 3 frozen embryo transfer did not impact clinical pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 1.048; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.518-2.119). The duration of progesterone administration (mean: 5.6 ± 0.5 days; range:5-6 days) before frozen blastocyst transfer may not affect clinical pregnancy (OR 1.339; 95% CI, 0.717-2.497).

Conclusion

There may be no significant correlation between the duration of progesterone supplementation and pregnancy outcomes in artificial FET cycles, although the clinical pregnancy rate was higher when progesterone supplementation was extended for one day before FET.

Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of letrozole versus natural cycle frozen embryo transfer of autologous euploid blastocyst

PURPOSE

To investigate the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of letrozole-stimulated frozen embryo transfer (LTZ-FET) cycles compared with natural FET cycles (NC-FET).

METHODS

Our retrospective cohort included all LTZ-FET (n = 161) and NC-FET (n = 575) cycles that transferred a single euploid autologous blastocyst from 2016 to 2020 at Stanford Fertility Center. The LTZ-FET protocol entailed 5 mg of daily letrozole for 5 days starting on cycle day 2 or 3. Outcomes were compared using absolute standardized differences (ASD), in which a larger ASD signifies a larger difference. Multivariable regression models adjusted for confounders: maternal age, BMI, nulliparity, embryo grade, race, infertility diagnosis, and endometrial thickness.

RESULTS

The demographic and clinical characteristics were overall similar. A greater proportion of the letrozole cohort was multiparous, transferred high-graded embryos, and had ovulatory dysfunction. The cohorts had similar pregnancy rates (67.1% LTZ vs 62.1% NC; aOR 1.31, P = 0.21) and live birth rates (60.9% LTZ vs 58.6% NC; aOR 1.17, P = 0.46). LTZ-FET neonates on average were born 5.7 days earlier (P < 0.001) and had higher prevalence of prematurity (18.6% vs. 8.0%NC, ASD = 0.32) and low birth weight (10.4% vs. 5.0%, ASD = 0.20). Both cohorts' median gestational ages (38 weeks and 1 day for LTZ; 39 weeks and 0 day for NC) were full term.

CONCLUSION

There were similar rates of pregnancy and live birth between LTZ-FET and NC-FET cycles. However, there was a higher prevalence of prematurity and low birth weight among LTZ-FET neonates. Reassuringly, the median gestational age in both cohorts was full term, and while the difference in gestational length of almost 6 days does not appear to be clinically significant, this warrants larger studies.

The future of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in hormone replacement therapy cycles

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the efficacy of letrozole stimulated frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) compared to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) FET in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and/or oligo-anovulation. Further, obstetric and perinatal risks in HRT FET are summarized.

RECENT FINDINGS

The presence of a corpus luteum seems to reduce the risk of pregnancy-related hypertension and preeclampsia after FET. As a natural cycle (NC) FET is not an option for women with oligo-/amenorrhea these women may benefit from FET with mild stimulation compared to HRT FET. The intention of mild stimulation in anovulatory women is to induce (mono) ovulation to mimic the endocrine profiles of the natural cycle and the early pregnancy after natural conception. Mild stimulation by letrozole is patient friendly and cheap compared to gonadotropin stimulated FET and has been increasingly used in recent years. Although the quality of evidence is low, the pregnancy outcomes after letrozole FET seems similar or even better compared to HRT FET in women with PCOS and/or oligo-anovulation.

SUMMARY

Natural and modified NC FET should be used whenever possible to mitigate adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes after HRT FET. For anovulatory women, whenever ovulation can be induced, we advocate the use of mild stimulation FET to create a corpus luteum awaiting results from RCTs limited to oligo-anovulatory women.

Agonist long protocol improves outcomes of vitrified-warmed embryo transfer in repeatedly thin endometrium

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does follicular stimulation using human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) after pituitary down-regulation by a GnRH agonist improve endometrial thickness (EMT) and clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET; using vitrified-warmed embryos) in women with thin endometrium after intensified oestrogen administration (IOA)?

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study. A total of 627 patients attempted 683 FET cycles with at least one previous history of thin endometrium. None of the cycles reached over 7 mm EMT after using oral and vaginal oestradiol for more than 21 days (IOA protocol). A total of 129 cycles proceeded with FET, 305 cycles were cancelled, and 249 cycles involved administration of HMG following GnRH agonist pituitary down-regulation (GnRH agonist + HMG protocol) for further endometrial preparation.

RESULTS

EMT became significantly greater (7.18 ± 1.14 mm versus 6.13 ± 0.63 mm, P < 0.001) using GnRH agonist + HMG compared with previous IOA cycles, but this was not related to serum oestrogen concentrations. A total of 213 cycles after the GnRH agonist + HMG protocol proceeded with FET, showing a significantly increased clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live birth rate compared with those after IOA.

CONCLUSIONS

The GnRH agonist + HMG protocol for endometrial preparation in FET cycles improves EMT in women with a thin endometrium after IOA and showed significantly better clinical outcomes than IOA. The authors suggest that the GnRH agonist + HMG protocol should be used for EMT that is less than 7 mm after there has been no optimal response to IOA.

Letrozole-induced endometrial preparation improved the pregnancy outcomes after frozen blastocyst transfer compared to the natural cycle: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Letrozole treatment is considered an effective option in endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfers in patients with ovulation disorders or irregular menstruation; however, the effectiveness of letrozole-induced endometrial preparation remains unclear in ovulatory patients. Furthermore, there is no comparative study reporting on pregnancy complications and congenital anomalies after frozen embryo transfers comparing natural and letrozole-assisted cycles. This study examined whether letrozole-induced endometrial preparation affected pregnancy outcomes, perinatal outcomes, and congenital anomalies after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers (SVBTs) in ovulatory patients, as compared with the natural cycle.

Methods

This historic cohort study included only patients with unexplained infertility. Overall, 14,611 patients who underwent SVBTs between July 2015 and June 2020, comprising both natural and letrozole-assisted cycles, were included. Multiple covariates that impact outcomes were used for propensity score matching; 1,911 patients in the letrozole group were matched to 12,700 patients in the natural group, and the clinical records of 1,910 patients in each group were retrospectively analysed. Cycle characteristics, pregnancy outcomes (clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth), and incidence of pregnancy complications and congenital anomalies were statistically compared between the two groups.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that letrozole administration during SVBT cycles significantly improved the live birth rate (P = 0.0355). Gestational age, birth length, birth weight, and infant sex, as well as the incidence of pregnancy complications and birth defects, were statistically comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the perinatal outcomes were not affected by letrozole-induced endometrial preparation.

Conclusions

Letrozole-induced endometrial preparation improved the live birth rate compared with the natural cycle, without adverse effects on perinatal outcomes and congenital anomalies after SVBTs. Therefore, letrozole-induced endometrial preparation might be a safe and more effective strategy, especially for patients with insufficient luteal function.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05174-0.

Pregnancy outcomes after frozen-thawed embryo transfer using letrozole ovulation induction, natural, or programmed cycles

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare pregnancy outcomes between letrozole ovulation induction, natural, and programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in a population based in the United States.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single university-affiliated infertility practice.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 3,148 FET cycles consisting of patients aged ≤45 years transferring blastocysts that were created from autologous oocytes between January 2015 and July 2021.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) or live birth rate (LBR). The secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy and clinical loss rates (CLRs).

RESULT(S)

The OPR/LBR was higher among letrozole FETs than among programmed FETs (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.21) but comparable to natural FETs (aRR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96-1.14). The OPR/LBR was comparable between natural and programmed FETs (aRR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.13). The CLR was lower in the natural FET group than in the programmed FET group (aRR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.84). There were no differences in CLRs between letrozole and programmed FETs and between letrozole and natural FETs. Among ovulatory women, the OPR/LBR among letrozole FETs was higher than that among programmed FETs (aRR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28). The CLR among ovulatory women was significantly lower in both letrozole FETs (aRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.87) and natural FETs (aRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.80) than in programmed FETs. Among anovulatory women, the OPR/LBR in the letrozole FET group was similar to that in the programmed FET group (aRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.79-1.13).

CONCLUSION(S)

Letrozole and natural FET clinical outcomes were improved compared with programmed FET outcomes.

Live birth after letrozole as an adjunct to follicle-stimulating hormone versus follicle-stimulating hormone alone for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilisation cycles-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is an effective infertility treatment but the live birth rate remains unsatisfactory. Ovarian stimulation by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is routinely used in IVF and the resulting high serum estradiol levels may impair oocyte/embryo quality and endometrial receptivity. Letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, can reduce serum estradiol levels following ovarian stimulation. We aim to test the hypothesis that co-treatment with letrozole reduces supraphysiological serum estradiol levels and improves endometrial receptivity, leading to a higher live birth rate of IVF. We are conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate whether letrozole as an adjunct to FSH in IVF is superior to FSH alone in the live birth rate of fresh embryo transfer.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is an open-label randomised controlled superiority trial being performed in two assisted reproduction centres in China. Infertile women who have antral follicle count (AFC) before ovarian stimulation or on day 5 of ovarian stimulation ≥15 are randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either letrozole and FSH or FSH alone in a GnRH antagonist protocol. Recruited women follow the standard operating procedures of the two centres. The primary outcome is the live birth rate of the fresh embryo transfer. Stimulation parameters, maternal side effects and obstetric and perinatal complications are secondary outcomes. The planned sample size is 900, i.e. 450 per group.

DISCUSSION

The present study is the first multicentre randomised study to compare the live birth rate of the fresh embryo transfer following ovarian stimulation by letrozole and FSH versus FSH alone in women with anticipated high ovarian responses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02912988 . Registered on September 23, 2016. This trial protocol is version 2.0.

Ovulation induction regimens are associated with a higher rate of livebirth after frozen single-blastocyst transfer among women with polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimen was suggested to be associated with a decreased rate of livebirth and a higher risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) after frozen cleavage stage embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). With the dramatically increased use of elective single embryo transfer, there is great need to explore the impacts of different endometrial preparation regimens on frozen single-blastocyst transfer in women with PCOS.

METHODS

In this study, a total of 3941 women who diagnosed with PCOS and underwent single-blastocyst transfer during their first cycles of frozen embryo transfer (FET) between March 2012 and December 2020 were included. We retrospectively compared the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen single-blastocyst transfer with endometrial preparation by HRT regimen (n = 3540), ovulation induction by human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) regimen (n = 226), and ovulation induction by letrozole regimen (n = 175).

RESULTS

After adjustment for confounders with multivariable logistic regression, the hMG regimen group [(58.4% vs. 49.6%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.89)] and letrozole regimen group (58.9% vs. 49.6%; aOR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.04-1.93) were associated with a higher rate of livebirth (primary outcome), compared with the group with HRT regimen. As to the secondary outcomes, the rate of pregnancy loss in the hMG regimen group (22.8% vs. 30.3%; aOR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.48-1.00) and letrozole regimen group (16.9% vs. 30.3%; aOR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30-0.78) was also lower than that in the HRT regimen group. The pregnancy outcomes between the hMG regimen group and the letrozole regimen group were similar. We did not observe significant difference in the incidences of maternal and neonatal complications among these three groups.

CONCLUSION

Ovulation induction regimen with letrozole or hMG for endometrial preparation was associated with a higher livebirth rate and a lower pregnancy loss rate in frozen single-blastocyst transfer cycles among women with PCOS.

Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes of Letrozole-Induced Ovulation and Hormone Replacement Therapy Protocols in Patients With Abnormal Ovulation Undergoing Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of frozen embryo transfer (FET), the best endometrial preparation protocol is continuously being discussed. The hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycle and letrozole-induced ovulation (L-OI) cycle are available protocols for patients with abnormal ovulation. Previous comparisons of the two protocols have focused on pregnancy outcomes, with less attention to perinatal outcomes, and population heterogeneity was large; thus, convincing conclusions about which protocol is more appropriate could not be drawn.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis for a population of patients undergoing FET cycles in the reproductive center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2016 to September 2020. The main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, very preterm delivery (VPTD), preterm delivery (PTD), low birth weight (LBW), macrosomia, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), premature rupture of membranes (PROM), placenta previa, and congenital abnormality.

RESULTS

A total of 8010 women were enrolled. Due to the large heterogeneity among the patients, we conducted 1:1 PSM, and 1461 women matched in each group. Compared with the HRT group, the L-OI group had a smaller proportion of thin endometrium (27.38% vs. 41.07%) and thicker endometrium on the day of embryo transfer (9.63 ± 1.82 vs. 8.91 ± 1.38). There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate, early abortion rate or live birth rate between the groups. There was no significant difference in perinatal outcomes of singleton live birth, including VPTD, PTD, postterm delivery, LBW, macrosomia, SGA, LGA, GDM, HDP, placenta previa, and congenital malformation.

CONCLUSION

For women with abnormal ovulation, the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of HRT and L-OI protocols are reassuring. It seems that both protocols are safe and effective for endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer in the clinic.

The impact of estradiol on pregnancy outcomes in letrozole-stimulated frozen embryo transfer cycles

Objective

To assess the impact of low estradiol (E2) levels in letrozole-stimulated frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

University-affiliated fertility center.

Patients

All patients who underwent letrozole-stimulated FET cycles from January 2017 to April 2020 (n = 217). The "Low E2" group was defined as those with E2 serum levels on the day of trigger <10th percentile level (E2 <91.16 pg/mL, n = 22) and the "Normal E2" group was defined as those with E2 serum levels ≥10th percentile level (E2 ≥91.16 pg/mL, n = 195).

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Pregnancy outcomes including rates of clinical pregnancy, clinical miscarriage, and live birth. Neonatal outcomes including gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and Apgar score.

Results

The mean ± SD estradiol level was 66.8 ± 14.8 pg/mL for the "Low E2" group compared with 366.3 ± 322.1 pg/mL for the "Normal E2" group. There were otherwise no substantial differences in cycle characteristics such as endometrial thickness on the day of ovulation trigger and progesterone levels in early pregnancy. The "Low E2" group had a significantly higher clinical miscarriage rate (36.4% vs. 8.8%, adjusted odds ratio 8.06) and lower live birth rate (31.8% vs. 57.9%, adjusted odds ratio 0.28). Neonatal outcomes such as gestational age at delivery, mean birth weight, Apgar scores, and incidence of newborn complications were not clinically different between the groups.

Conclusion

Low E2 levels were associated with a significantly higher miscarriage rate and lower live birth rate, suggesting that E2 levels in the follicular phase may have an effect on cycle outcomes. Given the rise in use of FET, further studies are needed to confirm our findings and understand the mechanisms.

Clinical pregnancy rates among anovulatory and oligoovulatory women after letrozole versus hormone replacement therapy in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

This cohort study investigated whether letrozole versus hormone replacement therapy (HRT) results in higher live birth rate among anovulatory and oligoovulatory women in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. It was conducted from 1st February 2018 to 31st January 2019 and included 261 anovulatory and oligoovulatory women. Since letrozole has become an effective alternative to HRT cycles, 121 patients received letrozole in 121 cycles from 1st February 2018 to 31st January 2019 and were compared to 140 HRT FET cycles among 140 women from 1st February 2017 to 31st January 2018. The primary outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy and miscarriage rates. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of transferred cleavage embryos were higher in the letrozole compared to the HRT group (36/65 (55.3%) vs. 20/110 (18.1%), p < 0.001) and (25/65 (38.4%) vs. 17/110 (15.4%), p < 0.001) respectively, whilst these rates were similar for transferred blastocyst embryos. Miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates were similar between groups. The letrozole group was older than the HRT group (31.8 ± 5.1 vs. 29.9 ± 5.1 years, p = 0.002) and more smoked cigarettes (p = 0.035). Groups were similar regarding BMI, male versus non-male indication for fertility treatment, peak oestradiol levels, and numbers of oocytes retrieved, blastocysts, frozen and transferred embryos. Letrozole compared to HRT might improve live birth and clinical pregnancy rates among anovulatory and oligoovulatory women undergoing FET cycles.

Comparison of frozen-thawed embryo transfer protocols in patients with previous cycle cancellation due to uterine peristalsis: a pilot study

Background/aim

To investigate the optimal protocol for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in patients who previously had a cycle cancellation due to uterine peristalsis (UP).

Materials and methods

Thirty-four patients with previous embryo transfer (ET) cancellation due to UP during artificial cycle (AC) were included retrospectively. In the proceeding cycle, endometrium was prepared with AC (n: 23) in AC-FET group or with stimulated cycle that contains letrozole (L) (n: 11) in L-FET group. Intravenous bolus dose of 6.75 mg atosiban (Tractocile; Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Switzerland) injection was performed to all patients of AC-FET group due to UP ≥ 4/min on the planned ET day of proceeding cycle. Atosiban was not used in L-FET group. Primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR) per ET. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per ET, implantation rate (IR), cycle cancellation rate.

Results

The baseline characteristics such as age, body mass index, antral follicle count, duration of infertility, and the number of prior in vitro fertilization attempts of each group were similar. The IR, CPR per ET, LBR per ET, CPR per cycle and LBR per cycle were significantly higher; cycle cancellation rates were significantly lower in L-FET group as compared to the AC-FET group.

Conclusion

Endometrial preparation with letrozole significantly improves CPR and LBR in FET cycles of patients with previous cycle cancellations due to UP.

Stimulated cycle versus artificial cycle for frozen embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes between the mild ovarian stimulation cycle versus an artificial cycle (AC) for frozen embryo transfer (FET) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

METHODS

We systematically searched the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 2020. The outcomes were live birth rate (LBR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), embryo implantation rate (IR) and miscarriage rate (MR). The mild ovarian stimulation cycle and AC were compared according to risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals using a fixed or random effects model.

RESULTS

Four retrospective studies describing the clinical outcomes were included. We found no significant difference in LBR, OPR, CPR, IR or MR between the mild ovarian stimulation cycle and AC protocols, whereas a lower MR was found for the letrozole-stimulated cycle than the AC.

CONCLUSIONS

The letrozole-stimulated cycle for endometrial preparation in PCOS patients undergoing FET may lower the MR more than the AC. PCOS patients using the mild ovarian stimulation cycle for endometrial preparation undergoing FET had similar LBR, OPR, CPR and IR compared with the AC. The letrozole-stimulated protocol may be a reasonable choice for endometrial preparation before FET for women with PCOS.

Effect of transdermal estrogen dose regimen for endometrial preparation of frozen-thawed embryo transfer on reproductive and obstetric outcomes

PURPOSE

Previous studies have reported different methods of estrogen administration during endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). This study aimed to investigate a beneficial regimen of transdermal estrogen administration for FET.

METHODS

We investigated the reproductive and obstetric outcomes of FET by comparing the increasing dose (ID) group that mimics changes in serum estradiol during the menstrual cycle and the constant dose (CD) group. Transdermal patches were used for estrogen administration in both groups. In our hospital, we targeted 315 cycles of the ID group in which FET was performed in 2017 and 324 cycles of the CD group in which FET was performed in 2018. In all cases, single embryo transfer was performed.

RESULTS

All were singleton pregnancies. There was no difference in clinical pregnancy rate (28.9% vs 28.2%, P =.837) and live birth rate (17.3% vs 21.4%, P =.201) between the ID and CD groups. Spontaneous abortion rate was significantly lower in the CD group than in the ID group (37.2% vs 23.0%, P =.041). There was no difference in obstetrical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

It was considered that the simple CD regimen may be more beneficial than the complicated ID regimen.

Live birth rate of twin pregnancies after frozen embryo transfer: natural cycle versus ovulation induction regimens

PURPOSE

Ovulation induction (OI) using letrozole or human menopausal hormone (hMG) is recently developed for endometrium preparation in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. The purpose of this study is to compare the live birth rate of twin pregnancies between modified natural and OI regimens for endometrium preparation in FET cycles.

STUDY DESIGN

This study included all consecutive twin pregnancies following FET with modified natural cycle (mNC-FET) or OI (OI-FET) regimen for endometrium preparation between January 2015 to June 2019. Primary outcome was the live birth of at least one twin per pregnancy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the potential association of endometrium preparation regimen and live birth. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 269 twin pregnancies after mNC-FET and 177 twin pregnancies after OI-FET were included. The live birth rate of at least one twin per pregnancy was not significantly different between mNC-FET and OI-FET groups, 92.2% vs 90.4%; aOR 0.65; 95%CI 0.32-1.34. The multivariable regression analysis showed that twin pregnancies after OI-FET had decreased odds for gestational diabetes mellitus (aOR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16-0.87) in comparison to twin pregnancies after mNC-FET. In subgroup analysis, we found that the rate of live birth of at least one twin per pregnancy was significantly higher in OI-FET cycles using letrozole compared to those using hMG (94% vs 83.3%; aOR 3.45; 95%CI 1.24-9.57).

CONCLUSION

The live birth rate in twin pregnancies after FET is comparable between mNC or OI regimens for endometrium preparation.

Ovulatory-Based FET Cycles May Achieve Higher Pregnancy Rates in the General Population and among Anovulatory Women

This study evaluated which endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles provides the best results for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients and the general population. This retrospective study of 634 FET cycles was conducted 2016-2018. Cycles were divided into Group A: Artificial endometrial preparations for FET (aFET; n = 348), Group B: Ovulatory cycle (n = 286) to compare two methods of endometrial preparation for FET. Artificial endometrial preparation with exogenous estrogen and progesterone versus natural ovulation cycles, modified natural cycles using hCG for the final triggering and letrozole-induced ovulation with hCG. Anovulatory patients were analyzed separately. Anovulatory PCOS patients had significantly higher pregnancy rates with letrozole treatment compared with aFET cycles (44% vs. 22.5%; p = 0.044). For the entire cohort, ovulatory cycles and aFET were similar in terms of patient characteristics, demographics, infertility causes, treatment protocols and number of embryos transferred. Although the mean ESHRE score of the transferred embryos was higher in the aFET group, we found higher clinical pregnancy rate in the ovulatory cycle FET (41.3% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.0001). A better pregnancy rate was found after ovulatory cycle FET. In the ovulatory cycles, the outcome of letrozole-induced and non-induced cycles were comparable. PCOS patients, as well as the general population, may benefit from ovulation induced FET cycles, with significantly better outcomes in FET in ovulatory cycles.

Comparison of Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes of Single Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Between Letrozole-Induction and HRT Cycles in Patients With Abnormal Ovulation

BACKGROUND

The use of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles has dramatically risen. The optimal endometrial preparation method for women undergoing FET is of utmost importance to provide the optimal chances of pregnancy. For patients with abnormal ovulation in particular, there have been few studies on FET protocols; notably, most of these studies focus only on the clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate (LBR) and pay little attention to the regimen's safety for offspring.

METHODS

It was a retrospective cohort study. First FET cycle with a single blastocyst from whole embryo frozen IVF/ICSI at the Reproductive Center of Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2016 and January 2020. The LBR was the primary outcome of interest. The secondary outcome measures were miscarriage rate and offspring safety, including preterm birth, low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), macrosomia and large-for-gestational age (LGA).

RESULTS

In total, 2782 FET cycles met the eligibility criteria for analysis. Additionally, there were 1178 singleton births from FET cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate was 58.4% in the L-FET group and 54.5% in the HRT group, with no statistical significance (P=.116). The miscarriage rate was higher in the HRT group than in the L-FET group (21.7% vs. 14.3%, P=.005). The LBR was significantly higher in the L-FET group than in the HRT group (49.6% vs. 41.7%, P=.001). Neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups. After adjustments for confounding factors, the LBR was higher in the L-FET group (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.58). The rate of miscarriage was lower in the L-FET group (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90).

CONCLUSION

For patients with abnormal ovulation, the L-FET regimen has a higher LBR and lower miscarriage rate than HRT. The neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups.

Letrozole for Female Infertility

Letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor that blocks estrogen synthesis by inhibiting the final step of the estrogen biosynthetic pathway, has been used in the applications of a wide range of infertility settings. It has been more than 20 years since the initial clinical trial of letrozole for ovulation induction. In light of the accumulating clinical and basic evidence, the efficacy and safety of letrozole have been identified. This mini review focuses on our current knowledge of the applications and mechanisms of letrozole for female infertility and various questions are put forward about how letrozole could be more effectively used.

The effect of letrozole versus artificial hormonal endometrial preparation on pregnancy outcome after frozen-thawed embryos transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Considering that clinical trial studies are limited in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients, and there is no consensus on an optimum endometrial preparation protocol for frozen embryo transfer (FET), the present study was designed as a randomized clinical trial to compare the reproductive outcomes following stimulated cycles with letrozole plus human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for endometrial preparation compared with routine AC-FET.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial was carried out on infertile PCOS patients who underwent IVF/ICSI and FET cycles in Arash Women's Hospital affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences between September 2018 and January 2020. PCOS diagnosis was based on the Rotterdam criteria. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into two groups: stimulated cycle with letrozole plus (HMG) (intervention group) and routine artificial hormonal endometrial preparation (control group).

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-seven infertile patients were recruited for participation in the study. Of these, 57 women were excluded due to non-eligibility for entering the study, and a total of 120 patients were randomly assigned to two study groups. After follow up, the cycle outcomes of 57 patients in the intervention group and 59 patients in the control group were compared. The data analysis showed that the two groups did not have significant differences in fundamental and demographic characteristics. After the intervention, there were no significant differences in implantation rate, chemical, ectopic, and clinical pregnancy rates between groups. Moreover, the rates of miscarriage and ongoing pregnancy were similar between groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found similar pregnancy outcomes with two endometrial preparation methods. Noting that each treatment centre should select the most beneficial and cost-effective method with the least adverse effects for patients, letrozole preparations for FET could be incorporated into possible options; however, establishing this approach as first-line treatment is premature in light of current evidence, and future randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are required for widespread application.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was also registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials on March 20th, 2020. ( IRCT20090526001952N12 at www.irct.ir , registered retrospectively).

Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes

BACKGROUND

A frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle is when one or more embryos (frozen during a previous treatment cycle) are thawed and transferred to the uterus. Some women undergo fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles with embryos derived from donated oocytes. In both situations, the endometrium is primed with oestrogen and progestogen in different doses and routes of administration.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the most effective endometrial preparation for women undergoing transfer with frozen embryos or embryos from donor oocytes with regard to the subsequent live birth rate (LBR).

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, LILACS, trials registers and abstracts of reproductive societies' meetings were searched in June 2020 together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating endometrial preparation in women undergoing fresh donor cycles and frozen embryo transfers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. We analysed all available interventions versus placebo, no treatment, or between each other. The primary review outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes were clinical and multiple pregnancy, miscarriage, cycle cancellation, endometrial thickness and adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-one RCTs (5426 women) were included. Evidence was moderate to very low-quality: the main limitations were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of methods, and serious imprecision. Stimulated versus programmed cycle We are uncertain whether a letrozole-stimulated cycle compared to a programmed cycle, for endometrial preparation, improves LBR (odds ratio (OR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 3.26; 100 participants; one study; very low-quality evidence). Stimulating with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), letrozole or clomiphene citrate may improve clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.38; 656 participants; five studies; I² = 11%; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if they reduce miscarriage rate (MR) (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.71; 355 participants; three studies; I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence). Endometrial thickness (ET) may be reduced with clomiphene citrate (mean difference(MD) -1.04, 95% CI -1.59 to -0.49; 92 participants; one study; low-quality evidence). Other outcomes were not reported. Natural versus programmed cycle We are uncertain of the effect from a natural versus programmed cycle for LBR (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.28; 1285 participants; four studies; I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence) and CPR (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.01; 1249 participants; five studies; I² = 60%; very low-quality evidence), while a natural cycle probably reduces the cycle cancellation rate (CCR) (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.82; 734 participants; one study; moderate-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect on MR and ET. No study reported other outcomes. Transdermal versus oral oestrogens From low-quality evidence we are uncertain of the effect transdermal compared to oral oestrogens has on CPR (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.25; 504 participants; three studies; I² = 58%) or MR (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.09; 414 participants; two studies; I² = 0%). Other outcomes were not reported. Day of starting administration of progestogen When doing a fresh ET using donated oocytes in a synchronised cycle starting progestogen on the day of oocyte pick-up (OPU) or the day after OPU, in comparison with recipients that start progestogen the day prior to OPU, probably increases the CPR (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.08; 282 participants; one study, moderate-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect on multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) or MR. It probably reduces the CCR (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.74; 282 participants; one study; moderate-quality evidence). No study reported other outcomes. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist versus control A cycle with GnRH agonist compared to without may improve LBR (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.19 to 5.78; 234 participants; one study; low-quality evidence). From low-quality evidence we are uncertain of the effect on CPR (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.43; 1289 participants; eight studies; I² = 20%), MR (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.00; 828 participants; four studies; I² = 0%), CCR (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.17; 530 participants; two studies; I² = 0%) and ET (MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.16; 697 participants; four studies; I² = 4%). No study reported other outcomes. Among different GnRH agonists From very low-quality evidence we are uncertain if cycles among different GnRH agonists improves CPR or MR. No study reported other outcomes. GnRH agonists versus GnRH antagonists GnRH antagonists compared to agonists probably improves CPR (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.90; 473 participants; one study; moderate-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect on MR and MPR. No study reported other outcomes. Aspirin versus control From very low-quality evidence we are uncertain whether a cycle with aspirin versus without improves LBR, CPR, or ET. Steroids versus control From very low-quality evidence we are uncertain whether a cycle with steroids compared to without improves LBR, CPR or MR. No study reported other outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence on the use of any particular intervention for endometrial preparation in women undergoing fresh donor cycles and frozen embryo transfers. In frozen embryo transfers, low-quality evidence showed that clinical pregnancy rates may be improved in a stimulated cycle compared to a programmed one, and we are uncertain of the effect when comparing a programmed cycle to a natural cycle. Cycle cancellation rates are probably reduced in a natural cycle. Although administering a GnRH agonist, compared to without, may improve live birth rates, clinical pregnancy rates will probably be improved in a GnRH antagonist cycle over an agonist cycle. In fresh synchronised oocyte donor cycles, the clinical pregnancy rate is probably improved and cycle cancellation rates are probably reduced when starting progestogen the day of or day after donor oocyte retrieval. Adequately powered studies are needed to evaluate each treatment more accurately.

Pregnancy Outcomes Following Letrozole Use in Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

While widely used for ovulation induction in assisted reproductive technology, the clinical efficacy of letrozole for endometrial preparation prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles remains yet to be elucidated. We performed a meta-analysis to compare pregnancy outcomes after letrozole use with those of other endometrial preparation protocols in patients undergoing FET. PubMed, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR) and birth defect rate (BDR) were analysed using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 10 studies representing 75 968 FET cycles were included. Comparable CPR and LBR were observed when comparing letrozole administration with natural cycle (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.69 – 2.24; OR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.60 – 2.32), artificial cycle (OR 1.46, 95% CI: 0.87 – 2.44; OR 1.39, 95% CI: 0.77 – 2.52), and artificial cycle with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression (OR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.78 – 1.59; OR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.82 – 1.68). Pooled results of the limited studies comparing letrozole with human menopausal gonadotropin demonstrated a similar CPR between groups (OR 1.46, 95% CI: 0.29 – 7.21, two studies), but the letrozole group had a statistically lower LBR (OR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52 – 0.86, one study). No increased BDR was observed in the letrozole group compared to natural cycles or artificial cycles (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.60 – 1.61; OR 1.39, 95% CI; 0.84 – 2.28). This pooled analysis supports the use of letrozole as an efficacious and safe alternative to mainstream regimens for endometrial preparation in FET cycles.

Pregnancy And Neonatal Outcomes Of hMG Stimulation With Or Without Letrozole In Endometrial Preparation For Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer In Ovulatory Women: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

Frozen–thawed embryo transfer enables surplus embryos derived from IVF or IVF-ICSI treatment to be stored and transferred in subsequent cycles into a more “physiologic environment”. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of letrozole use or hMG stimulation on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in ovulatory patients undergoing FET.

Methods

This study includes a total of 5901 FET cycles with letrozole use (n = 1569), HMG (n =1827) or letrozole + HMG (n = 2505). In the letrozole group, 2.5 mg of letrozole was administered on menstrual cycle day 3 to 5 for 3 days for patients, and then follicle growth was monitored beginning on day 10. If the follicular diameter was ≥14 mm on the 10th day, no other ovarian stimulation drugs were needed. If the follicular diameter was <14 mm on the 10th day, 150 IU human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) was added to stimulate follicle growth every two days (hMG + letrozole group). In hMG stimulation group, a total of 150 IU of hMG was injected every two days to stimulate development of follicles from cycle day 10 to 12.

Results

Compared with the patients undergoing hMG stimulation, the group receiving letrozole or letrozole+HMG stimulation exhibits significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates per transfer (hMG: 47.02% vs letrozole: 52.07% vs letrozole+HMG: 52.26%) and implantation rates (hMG: 31.76% vs letrozole: 34.36% vs letrozole+HMG: 34.24%). In addition, the letrozole group was associated with a statistically significantly lower incidence of miscarriage (hMG: 14.78% vs letrozole: 10.53% vs letrozole+HMG: 14.13%) and ectopic pregnancies (hMG: 1.83% vs letrozole: 0.97% vs letrozole+HMG: 1.58%) than the letrozole + HMG and HMG groups. Neonatal outcomes are similar among the three groups.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrate that the letrozole use may improve clinical pregnancy outcomes and decrease the risk of ectopic pregnancies and miscarriage in ovulatory patients who receive FET cycles.

Letrozole use during frozen embryo transfer cycles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether live birth rate (LBR) following frozen-thawed embryo transfer in letrozole-stimulated cycles (L-FET) differs from LBR after artificial-cycle frozen-thawed embryos transfers (AC-FET) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 2,664 patients with PCOS who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the period from 2011 to 2016.

INTERVENTIONS(S)

Letrozole use versus hormone replacement therapies during FET.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

LBR per embryo transfer was the primary outcome. The secondary end points included ongoing and clinical pregnancy rate, cancellation rate, endometrial thickness, and pregnancy loss rate. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULT(S)

In our crude analysis, LBR per embryo transfer was similar between groups (54.4% in the L-FET vs. 50.7% for the AC-FET). The crude odds of pregnancy loss was significantly lower in L-FET compared with AC-FET (9.1% vs. 17%). Nonetheless, after adjusting for possible confounding factors, LBR was significantly higher in L-FET compared with AC-FET. Moreover, the rates of pregnancy loss remained consistently lower in the L-FET group than in the AC-FET group.

CONCLUSION(S)

In patients with PCOS undergoing FET, letrozole use for endometrial preparation was associated with higher LBR compared with artificial cycles, albeit after statistical adjustment for confounding factors. Future prospective randomized studies are needed to verify our findings.

Mid-luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist support in frozen-thawed embryo transfers during artificial cycles: A prospective interventional pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of an additional single mid-luteal dose of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in hormonally substituted frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective interventional pilot study. Women scheduled for FET were randomly selected to receive standard hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) for endometrial preparation or HRT with a single additional subcutaneous dose of 0.1mg triptorelin at the time of implantation. If FET was not followed by a pregnancy, women with surplus embryos were scheduled for a single second attempt in a crossover setting. Altogether, 144 FET cycles were analyzed. The carryover effect was tested using a logistic regression model. Logistic regression analysis for binary variables was applied with generalized estimation equation extension to account for dependence among repeated treatments.

RESULTS

The live birth rate (LBR) was 9.8 percentage points higher and the miscarriage rate 14.7 percentage points lower in the intervention group (n=72) than in the control group (n=72), but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were comparable between the groups. No congenital malformations or differences in the median birth weight of newborns were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Observable but statistically insignificant difference in LBR and miscarriage rate favoring luteal phase GnRHa support was detected. Further, no malformations or effect on fetal growth were observed. Larger studies are needed to confirm the results of this pilot study.

Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following letrozole use in frozen-thawed single embryo transfer cycles

STUDY QUESTION

Are pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following letrozole use comparable with natural and HRT cycles in patients undergoing single frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Letrozole use was significantly associated with higher rates of clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy with fetal heart beat and live birth, and with a lower rate of miscarriage, compared with natural and HRT cycles.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Letrozole is the most commonly used aromatase inhibitor for mild ovarian stimulation in ART. However, the effect of letrozole on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in FET are not well known.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Japanese national ART registry between 2012 and 2013.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

A total of 110 722 single FET cycles with letrozole (n = 2409), natural (n = 41 470) or HRT cycles (n = 66 843) were included. The main outcomes were the rates of clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy with fetal heart beat, miscarriage and live birth. Adjusted odds ratios and relative risks (RRs) were calculated using a generalized estimating equation adjusting for correlations within clinics.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The rates of clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy with fetal heart beat, and live birth were significantly higher, while the rate of miscarriage was significantly lower in the letrozole group compared with the natural and HRT groups. In blastocyst stage transfers, the adjusted RRs for clinical pregnancy with fetal heart beat of letrozole compared with natural and HRT cycles were 1.48 (95% CI: 1.41-1.55) and 1.62 (95% CI: 1.54-1.70), respectively. Similarly, the adjusted RRs of letrozole for miscarriage compared with natural and HRT cycles were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.87), respectively. Neonatal outcomes were mostly similar in letrozole, natural and HRT cycles.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

Important limitations of this study included the lack of information concerning the reasons for selecting the specific FET method, parity, the number of previous ART failures, embryo quality and the dose and duration of letrozole intake.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These results suggest that letrozole use may improve clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy with fetal heart beat, and live births and reduce the risk of miscarriage in patients undergoing single FET cycles.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funding was used for this study. There are no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

A successful live birth with in vitro fertilization and thawed embryo transfer after conservative treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer

Estrogen-dependent early stage endometrial cancer is relatively common in young women of reproductive age. The standard treatment is hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), even in early stage well-differentiated endometrial cancer patients. This surgical option results in permanent loss of fertility. There have been some reports of live births using in vitro fertilization after conservative management of endometrial cancer with high-dose progestin for the purpose of fertility preservation. However, most were not recurrent cases and pregnancy was achieved through conventional in vitro fertilization, which usually raises serum estradiol levels and may lead to the recurrence of endometrial cancer. To date, it is hard to find a case that can be referred for any possible different approach needed for the patients who experience recurrence. Here we report a successful live birth with in vitro fertilization using letrozole to maintain physiological levels of estradiol, and subsequent thawed embryo transfer after elective cryopreservation of embryos in a patient with recurrent endometrial cancer. There has been no evidence of disease recurrence at one year after delivery.

No increased risk of major congenital anomalies or adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes following letrozole use in assisted reproductive technology

STUDY QUESTION

Does letrozole use increase the risk of major congenital anomalies and adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in fresh, single-embryo transfer?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Letrozole significantly decreases the risk of miscarriage and does not increase the risk of major congenital anomalies or adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes compared with natural cycles in patients undergoing ART.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Letrozole is the most commonly used aromatase inhibitor for mild ovarian stimulation in ART. However, its safety in terms of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes is unclear.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japanese national ART registry from 2011 to 2013.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 3136 natural cycles and 792 letrozole-induced cycles associated with fresh, single-embryo transfer and resulting in a clinical pregnancy were included in the analysis. The main pregnancy outcomes were miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and still birth, and the neonatal outcomes were preterm delivery, low birth weight, small/large for gestational age and major congenital anomalies. Terminated pregnancies were included in the analysis of major congenital anomalies. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for maternal age and calendar year.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The risk of miscarriage was significantly lower in women administered letrozole (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.37, 95% CI, 0.30-0.47, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the overall risk of major congenital anomalies between the two groups (natural cycle 1.5% vs letrozole 1.9%, aOR, 1.24, 95% CI, 0.64-2.40, P = 0.52), and no increased risk for any specific organ system. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the risk of major congenital anomalies was not increased in patients who underwent either in vitro fertilization or ICSI, or in those who received early cleavage stage or blastocyst embryo transfer. All other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

Despite the large sample size, we were only able to rule out the possibility that letrozole might cause large increases in birth-defect risks in ART patients.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The results suggest that letrozole stimulation reduces the risk of miscarriage, with no increase in the risk of major congenital anomalies or adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes compared with natural cycles in women undergoing ART. Letrozole may thus be a safe option for mild ovarian stimulation.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Pregnancy outcome following frozen embryo transfer after artificial cycle or treatment by clomiphene citrate

The optimal method to prepare endometrium before frozen embryo transfer (FET) is not yet established. We retrospectively studied 4496 FET and detailed pregnancy and miscarriage rates in three groups of patients according to the endometrium preparation they have followed before their successive FET: clomifene citrate (CC, group 1), artificial cycle (AC, group 2) or switch between CC and AC (group 3). The overall pregnancy rates per transfer were 24.3, 20.8 and 17.3% while the miscarriage rates reached 23.2, 29.8 and 42.5%, respectively. Group 1 experienced the highest ongoing pregnancy rate (18.6%), the lowest being observed in group 3 (10.0%, p < 0.001). Here we propose several alternatives to improve our AC protocol (group 2) that seemed less effective than CC (group 1) and we consider the use of a gonadotrophin-stimulated treatment for patients with the lowest reproductive outcomes (group 3).

Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best protocol to prepare endometrium for frozen embryo replacement (FER) cycles.

METHODS

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Following PubMed and OvidSP search, a total of 1166 studies published after 1990 were identified following removal of duplicates. Following exclusion of studies not matching our inclusion criteria, a total of 33 studies were analyzed. Primary outcome measure was live birth. The following protocols, including true natural cycle (tNC), modified natural cycle (mNC), artificial cycle (AC) with or without suppression, and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) with gonadotropin (Gn) or aromatase inhibitor (AI), were compared.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference for both clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted between tNC and mNC groups. When tNC and AC without suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate in favor of tNC, whereas it failed to reach statistical significance for live birth. When tNC and AC with suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in live birth rate favoring the latter. Similar pregnancy outcome was noted among mNC versus AC with or without suppression groups. Similarly, no difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted when ACs with or without suppression groups are compared.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consistent superiority of any endometrial preparation for FER. However, mNC has several advantages (being patient-friendly; yielding at least equivalent or better pregnancy rates when compared with tNC and AC with or without suppression; may not require LPS). Mild OS with Gn or AI may be promising.