1
|
Sockel K, Neu A, Goeckenjan M, Ditschkowski M, Hilgendorf I, Kröger N, Ayuk FA, Stoelzel F, Middeke JM, Eder M, Bethge W, Finke J, Bertz H, Kobbe G, Kaufmann M, Platzbecker U, Beverungen D, Schmid C, von Bonin M, Egger-Heidrich K, Heberling L, Trautmann-Grill K, Teipel R, Bug G, Tischer J, Fraccaroli A, Fante M, Wolff D, Luft T, Winkler J, Schäfer-Eckart K, Scheid C, Holtick U, Klein S, Blau IW, Burchert A, Wulf G, Hasenkamp J, Schwerdtfeger R, Kaun S, Junghanss C, Wortmann F, Winter S, Neidlinger H, Theuser C, Beyersmann J, Bornhaeuser M, Schmeller S, Schetelig J. Hope for motherhood: pregnancy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (a national multicenter study). Blood 2024; 144:1532-1542. [PMID: 39007722 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024024342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Improved long-term survival rates after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) make family planning for young adult cancer survivors an important topic. However, treatment-related infertility risk poses challenges. To assess pregnancy and birth rates in a contemporary cohort, we conducted a national multicenter study using data from the German Transplant Registry, focusing on adult women aged 18 to 40 years who underwent alloHCT between 2003 and 2018. Of 2654 women who underwent transplantation, 50 women experienced 74 pregnancies, occurring at a median of 4.7 years after transplant. Fifty-seven of these resulted in live births (77%). The annual first birth rate among HCT recipients was 0.45%, which is >6 times lower than in the general population. The probability of a live birth 10 years after HCT was 3.4%. Factors associated with an increased likelihood of pregnancy were younger age at alloHCT, nonmalignant transplant indications, no total body irradiation or a cumulative dose of <8 Gy, and nonmyeloablative/reduced-intensity conditioning. Notably, 72% of pregnancies occurred spontaneously, with assisted reproductive technologies used in the remaining cases. Preterm delivery and low birth weight were more common than in the general population. This study represents the largest data set reporting pregnancies in a cohort of adult female alloHCT recipients. Our findings underscore a meaningful chance of pregnancy in alloHCT recipients. Assisted reproductive technologies techniques are important and funding should be made available. However, the potential for spontaneous pregnancies should not be underestimated, and patients should be informed of the possibility of unexpected pregnancy despite reduced fertility. Further research is warranted to understand the impact of conditioning decisions on fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Sockel
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Annika Neu
- Altona Children's Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maren Goeckenjan
- Department for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Markus Ditschkowski
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Inken Hilgendorf
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung für Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Jena, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Kröger
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francis A Ayuk
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Friedrich Stoelzel
- Division of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Immunotherapy, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jan Moritz Middeke
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Matthias Eder
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Bethge
- Department of Medicine II, Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Finke
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Bertz
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Guido Kobbe
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Kaufmann
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology, and Hematology, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Uwe Platzbecker
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy and Hemostaseology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - David Beverungen
- Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy and Hemostaseology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christoph Schmid
- Augsburg University Hospital and Medical Faculty and Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Malte von Bonin
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katharina Egger-Heidrich
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lisa Heberling
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Karolin Trautmann-Grill
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Raphael Teipel
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gesine Bug
- Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Johanna Tischer
- Department of Medicine III, Ludwig Maximilian University, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alessia Fraccaroli
- Department of Medicine III, Ludwig Maximilian University, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Fante
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wolff
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Hematology, and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Luft
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology/Oncology/Rheumatology), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Winkler
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Nuremberg Hospital North, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Udo Holtick
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Klein
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Igor Wolfgang Blau
- Department of BMT, Clinic of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Charite-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Burchert
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology, Carreras Leukemia Center, Philips University Marburg and University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Gerald Wulf
- Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Justin Hasenkamp
- Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Rainer Schwerdtfeger
- Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik Helios Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Stephan Kaun
- Hematology, Oncology und Infectiology, Clinic Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Christian Junghanss
- Department of Medicine, Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Friederike Wortmann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Center, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Susann Winter
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Helga Neidlinger
- German Registry of Stem Cell Transplantation (DRST), Ulm, Germany
| | - Catrin Theuser
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Martin Bornhaeuser
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Johannes Schetelig
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chan LS, Cochon KL, Li TC, Chung JPW, Kim JH. Knowledge and intentions to use fertility preservation among urban Chinese cancer patients: A study from Hong Kong. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0307715. [PMID: 39259733 PMCID: PMC11389933 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the knowledge levels and fertility preservation (FP) intentions of urban Chinese cancer patients. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted on Hong Kong Chinese male and female cancer patients aged 18-54 years (N = 325) who were recruited by a local non-governmental organization for cancer patients between July 2020 to January 2021. Patients completed a self-administered questionnaire on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions to use FP services/seek FP-related information. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the correlates of intention to seek additional FP information and intention to undergo FP treatments. RESULTS Although cancer patients demonstrated a good knowledge of the available FP treatment options, they were less knowledgeable about the legal restrictions of these procedures. Only one in seven cancer patients first became aware of FP through a health provider and the majority of cancer patients felt they did not have adequate knowledge about FP to make informed FP decisions at the current time. Yet, over one-third of cancer patients would consider FP options even if their cancer or cancer treatment had < 5% chance of causing infertility, and 13.4% of females and 14.6% of males would delay their cancer treatment by ≥ 3 months to undergo FP procedures. However, for both sexes, the main perceived barrier to obtaining FP was its financial cost. Patients with older-aged spouses were less likely to seek FP treatments or seek more information about FP. CONCLUSION There is an unmet need for more FP information and FP services for reproductive-aged cancer patients in East Asian populations. Greater integration of FP services into cancer treatment requires a reduction of cost barriers, greater provision of timely FP information, and improved referral systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis S. Chan
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Kim L. Cochon
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines - Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Tin C. Li
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Jacqueline P. W. Chung
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Jean H. Kim
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Immediata V, Cirillo F, Baggiani A, Zanagnolo MF, Ronchetti C, Morenghi E, Cesana A, Specchia C, Levi-Setti PE. Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte's storing for fertility preservation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1054123. [PMID: 36561560 PMCID: PMC9763445 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1054123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oocyte cryopreservation is a valid option for female cancer patients to preserve fertility. The number of patients undergoing fertility preservation (FP) cycles has increased over the past years. Nevertheless, the rates of patients returning to use their cryopreserved material have shown to be considerably low, ranging from 5-8%, but significant data regarding the reasons of such low return rates are scarce. METHODS This study is a single-center follow-up retrospective study evaluating the return rate of oncological women who underwent FP at a tertiary care Fertility Center and assessing the reasons influencing the patients who did not return. Data about patients who returned to attempt pregnancy were retrieved from internal registries. Non-returned patients were assessed with a standardized phone survey investigating health condition, marital status and family projects, spontaneous conceptions, and the reasons why they had not returned to use their gametes. A univariate analysis between returned and non-returned patients was performed. RESULTS Of the 397 patients who received counseling about FP, 171 (43.1%) underwent oocyte cryopreservation between 2001 and 2017. Nine (5%) died, and 17 (10%) were lost at follow-up. A total of 20 patients (11.7%) returned and 125 did not. In the non-returned group, 37 (29.6%) did not have a partner, 10 (8%) had a previous spontaneous conception, and 15 (12%) had recurrent malignancy at the time of follow-up. In the univariate analysis, younger age at freezing (31.8±6.2 vs. 35.2±4.7; p 0.018), lack of a partner (p 0.002), type of cancer (other than breast cancer; p 0.024) were the significant factors in the non-returned group. As for the personal reason for not coming back, patients mainly answered as follows: lack of a partner (29, 23.2%), the desire for spontaneous motherhood (24, 19.2%), previous spontaneous pregnancies after FP procedures (16, 12.8%), and still ongoing hormonal therapy for breast cancer (13, 10.4%). All patients confirmed their will to keep the storage of their oocytes. DISCUSSION The impact of a cancer diagnosis on a woman's maternal desire, sentimental status and life priorities should be studied more thoroughly. Studies investigating hormonal therapy suppression in breast cancer patients seeking pregnancy should be encouraged. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05223764.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Immediata
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Cirillo
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Annamaria Baggiani
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Federica Zanagnolo
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Ronchetti
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Morenghi
- Biostatistics Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Amalia Cesana
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Specchia
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mehedintu C, Frincu F, Carp-Veliscu A, Barac R, Badiu DC, Zgura A, Cirstoiu M, Bratila E, Plotogea M. A Warning Call for Fertility Preservation Methods for Women Undergoing Gonadotoxic Cancer Treatment. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 57:medicina57121340. [PMID: 34946285 PMCID: PMC8709408 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57121340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant hematological conditions have recognized an increased incidence and require aggressive treatments. Targeted chemotherapy, accompanied or not by radiotherapy, raises the chance of defeating the disease, yet cancer protocols often associate long-term gonadal consequences, for instance, diminished or damaged ovarian reserve. The negative effect is directly proportional to the types, doses, time of administration of chemotherapy, and irradiation. Additionally, follicle damage depends on characteristics of the disease and patient, such as age, concomitant diseases, previous gynecological conditions, and ovarian reserve. Patients should be adequately informed when proceeding to gonadotoxic therapies; hence, fertility preservation should be eventually regarded as a first-intention procedure. This procedure is most beneficial when performed before the onset of cancer treatment, with the recommendation for embryos or oocytes’ cryopreservation. If not feasible or acceptable, several options can be available during or after the cancer treatment. Although not approved by medical practice, promising results after in vitro studies increase the chances of future patients to protect their fertility. This review aims to emphasize the mechanism of action and impact of chemotherapy, especially the one proven to be gonadotoxic, upon ovarian reserve and future fertility. Reduced fertility or infertility, as long-term consequences of chemotherapy and, particularly, following bone marrow transplantation, is often associated with a negative impact of recovery, social and personal life, as well as highly decreased quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Mehedintu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.M.); (F.F.); (A.C.-V.), (R.B.); (A.Z.); (M.C.); (E.B.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Nicolae Malaxa” Clinical Hospital, 022441 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Francesca Frincu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.M.); (F.F.); (A.C.-V.), (R.B.); (A.Z.); (M.C.); (E.B.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Nicolae Malaxa” Clinical Hospital, 022441 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Andreea Carp-Veliscu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.M.); (F.F.); (A.C.-V.), (R.B.); (A.Z.); (M.C.); (E.B.)
| | - Ramona Barac
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.M.); (F.F.); (A.C.-V.), (R.B.); (A.Z.); (M.C.); (E.B.)
| | - Dumitru-Cristinel Badiu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.M.); (F.F.); (A.C.-V.), (R.B.); (A.Z.); (M.C.); (E.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +40-723226346
| | - Anca Zgura
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.M.); (F.F.); (A.C.-V.), (R.B.); (A.Z.); (M.C.); (E.B.)
| | - Monica Cirstoiu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.M.); (F.F.); (A.C.-V.), (R.B.); (A.Z.); (M.C.); (E.B.)
| | - Elvira Bratila
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.M.); (F.F.); (A.C.-V.), (R.B.); (A.Z.); (M.C.); (E.B.)
| | - Mihaela Plotogea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Nicolae Malaxa” Clinical Hospital, 022441 Bucharest, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|