Perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with severe COVID-19 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a case series and literature review

[Pregnant women with COVID-19 ARDS on the intensive care unit]

BACKGROUND

Pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at increased risk of severe disease progression. Comorbidities, such as chronic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, advanced maternal age and high body mass index, may predispose to severe disease. The management of pregnant COVID-19 patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and requires careful consideration of maternal, fetal and ethical issues.

OBJECTIVE

Description and discussion of intensive care treatment strategies and perinatal anesthesiological management in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the demographic data, maternal medical history, clinical intensive care management, complications, indications and management of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and infant survival of all pregnant patients treated for severe CARDS in the anesthesiological ICU of a German university hospital between March and November 2021.

RESULTS

The cohort included 9 patients with a mean age of 30.3 years (range 26-40 years). The gestational age ranged from 21 + 3 weeks to 37 + 2 weeks. None of the patients had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV‑2. Of the nine patients seven were immigrants and communication was hampered by inadequate Central European language skills. Of the patients five had a PaO2/FiO2 index < 150 mm Hg despite escalated invasive ventilation (FiO2 > 0.9 and a positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] of 14 mbar) and were therefore treated with repeated prolonged prone positioning maneuvers (5-14 prone positions for 16 h each, a total of 47 prone positioning treatments) and 2 required treatment with inhaled nitric oxide and venovenous ECMO. The most common complications were bacterial superinfection of the lungs, urinary tract infection and delirium. All the women and five neonates survived. All newborns were delivered by cesarean section, two patients were discharged home with an intact pregnancy and two intrauterine fetal deaths were observed. None of the newborns tested positive for SARS-CoV‑2 at birth.

CONCLUSION

High survival rates are possible in pregnant patients with CARDS. The peripartum management of pregnant women with CARDS requires close interdisciplinary collaboration and should prioritize maternal survival in early pregnancy. In our experience, prolonged prone positioning, an essential evidence-based cornerstone in the treatment of ARDS, can also be safely used in advanced stages of pregnancy. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and ECMO should be considered as life-saving treatment options for carefully selected patients. For cesarean section, neuraxial anesthesia can be safely performed in patients with mild CARDS if well planned but the therapeutic anticoagulation recommended for COVID-19 may increase the risk of bleeding complications, making general anesthesia a more viable alternative, especially in severe disease.

Pregnancy-Associated Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the United States

OBJECTIVE

 The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy has increased in the adult population. Studies from the H1N1 influenza pandemic suggest that ECMO deployment in pregnancy is associated with favorable outcomes. With increasing numbers of pregnant women affected by COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) and potentially requiring this life-saving therapy, we sought to compare comorbidities, costs, and outcomes between pregnancy- and nonpregnancy-associated ECMO therapy among reproductive-aged female patients.

STUDY DESIGN

 We used the 2013 to 2019 National Readmissions Database. Diagnosis and procedural coding were used to identify ECMO deployment, potential indications, comorbid conditions, and pregnancy outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality during the patient's initial ECMO stay. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and hospital charges/costs, occurrence of thromboembolic or bleeding complications during ECMO hospitalization, and mortality and readmissions up to 330 days following ECMO stay. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to model the associations between pregnancy status and outcomes.

RESULTS

 The sample included 324 pregnancy-associated hospitalizations and 3,805 nonpregnancy-associated hospitalizations, corresponding to national estimates of 665 and 7,653 over the study period, respectively. Pregnancy-associated ECMO had lower incidence of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.75) and bleeding complications (aOR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.93). Length of stay was significantly shorter (adjusted rate ratio (aRR): 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.96) and total hospital costs were less (aRR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93). Differences in the incidence of thromboembolic events (aOR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.78-1.38) were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

 Pregnancy-associated ECMO therapy had lower incidence of in-hospital death, bleeding complications, total inpatient cost, and length of stay when compared with nonpregnancy-associated ECMO therapy without increased thromboembolic complications. Pregnancy-associated ECMO therapy should be offered to eligible patients.

KEY POINTS

· Pregnancy-related ECMO use was compared with nonpregnant use.. · Outcomes were equal or favored pregnancy-related deployment.. · These data may be useful when considering ECMO use in pregnancy..

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pregnant and Postpartum Women With Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the maternal survival and live-birth rates in pregnant women with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who are treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

From database inception through August 2023, we explored MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies reporting maternal survival and live-birth rates in pregnant women with critical COVID-19 undergoing ECMO were included.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers separately ascertained studies, obtained data, and evaluated study quality. Summary estimates of maternal survival and live-birth rates were measured, and 95% CIs were calculated.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Nine retrospective case series and 12 retrospective cohort studies were identified with 386 pregnant women with critical COVID-19 who underwent ECMO. Studies evaluated women that were treated from January 2020 to October 2022. Four studies were from the United States; three were from Turkey; two were from France; two were from Israel; and one each was from Columbia, Germany, Italy, Kuwait, Poland, Republic of Srpska, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, a consortium from Belgium, France, Switzerland, and an international registry. The pooled estimate of the maternal survival rate among pregnant patients who were initiated on ECMO was 75.6% (95% CI, 66.0-84.1%, I2 =72%). The pooled estimate of the live-birth rate among pregnant patients who were initiated on ECMO was 83.7% (95% CI, 76.8-89.6%, 153 neonates, I2 =11%). When the case series and cohort studies were examined separately, the results were similar.

CONCLUSION

Among pregnant women with acute respiratory distress syndrome attributable to critical COVID-19 who were managed with ECMO, maternal survival and live-birth rates were high.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42023442800.

SARS-CoV-2-Infected Pregnant Woman Requiring 38 Days of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Experiences Rectal Ulcer Bleeding: A Case Report

Pregnancy has been shown to be associated with an adverse clinical course and symptomatic patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is rarely used in pregnant or postpartum women with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we report the rare case of a pregnant woman diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection placed on ECMO postpartum who subsequently received treatment for active rectal ulcer bleeding. Despite being placed on ECMO for 38 days and receiving a massive transfusion of 95 packs of red blood cells, she recovered and was discharged on hospital day 112. ECMO can be used in most patients with severe COVID-19, including pregnant patients, although potential coagulopathy complications must be considered.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): A Lifeline for Pregnant and Postpartum Women

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving technology that temporarily supports the heart and lungs in critical care situations. This review article examines the role of ECMO as a lifeline for pregnant and postpartum women facing severe maternal and fetal conditions. The review begins with an overview of the physiology and pathophysiology of ECMO, including its procedure and how it supports cardiopulmonary function. Unique considerations specific to pregnant and postpartum women, such as physiological changes during pregnancy, risks and complications associated with ECMO, and the need to balance maternal and fetal considerations, are discussed. The indications for ECMO in this population are explored, including common maternal indications such as cardiogenic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary embolism, and eclampsia, as well as fetal indications such as fetal distress, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), and twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). The challenges and considerations in ECMO for pregnant and postpartum women, including ethical considerations and the decision-making process, are highlighted. The review further explores the multidisciplinary care and collaborative approach required, emphasizing the importance of a specialized ECMO team and collaboration between obstetricians, neonatologists, cardiologists, and other specialists. Additionally, patient selection, pre-ECMO assessment, and planning strategies are discussed. The review evaluates existing literature and studies on ECMO in pregnant and postpartum women, analyzing survival rates and maternal and fetal outcomes and comparing different ECMO modalities and strategies. Future directions and research opportunities are presented, including emerging technologies, areas for further research and clinical trials, and improved patient selection and management strategies. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of ECMO as a lifeline for pregnant and postpartum women and the potential impact on maternal and fetal health. The review highlights the need for ongoing research and advancements in ECMO to optimize outcomes and improve care for this unique and vulnerable patient population.

COVID-19 and Pregnancy: An Updated Review about Evidence-Based Therapeutic Strategies

The COVID-19 pandemic posed a significant challenge for clinicians in managing pregnant women, who were at high risk of virus transmission and severe illness. While the WHO declared in May 2023 that COVID-19 is no longer a public health emergency, it emphasized that it remains a global health threat. Despite the success of vaccines, the possibility of new pandemic waves due to viral mutations should be considered. Ongoing assessment of the safety and effectiveness of pharmacological therapies is crucial in clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes the evidence-based therapeutic strategies for pregnant women with COVID-19, considering over three years of pandemic experience. The review discusses the safety and effectiveness of various drug regimens (antivirals, anticoagulants, corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, monoclonal antibodies, and therapeutic gases) and procedures (prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). Drugs with contraindications, inefficacy during pregnancy, or unknown adverse effects were excluded from our evaluation. The aim is to provide healthcare professionals with a comprehensive guide for managing pregnant women with COVID-19 based on lessons learned from the pandemic outbreak.

Extracorporeal life support in pregnant and postpartum women with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an intervention used for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from COVID-19 who have failed conventional ventilatory strategies. Very few studies have given insight into the outcomes of pregnant and postpartum patients requiring ECMO support.

METHODS

Single center, retrospective, observational study of female pregnant and postpartum patients suffering COVID-19 ARDS and requiring ECMO.

RESULTS

Eight SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were identified. The average age was 31 ± 4 years, with Body Mass Indices (BMI) and SOFA scores ranging between 32-49 and 8-11, respectively. Two patients were pregnant at the time of ECMO initiation, two were peripartum, and four were postpartum. Five patients (63%) had bleeding, and one patient had a hysterectomy. Seven patients (88%) were supported by V-V ECMO and one with V-A ECMO. Patients had between one and three circuit exchanges due to oxygenator failure or clots in the circuit. All patients were in ICU between 7 and 74 days, with hospital length of stay between 8 and 81 days. All patients were weaned off ECMO and were successfully discharged from the hospital. All newborns were born via cesarean section, and all survived to discharge.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows a 100% neonatal and maternal survival rate demonstrating that ECMO in this patient population is safe. These patients should be transferred to experienced high-volume ECMO centers with the ability to perform emergent cesarean sections. ECMO should be considered a life-saving therapy for pregnant women with severe COVID-19 with an overall excellent maternal and neonatal survival rate.

Outcome predictors and patient progress following delivery in pregnant and postpartum patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonitis in intensive care units in Israel (OB-COVICU): a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

A key unresolved controversy in severe COVID-19 pneumonitis in pregnancy is the optimum timing of delivery and whether delivery improves or worsens maternal outcomes. We aimed to assess clinical data on every intensive care unit (ICU) day for pregnant and postpartum women admitted to the ICU with COVID-19, with a particular focus on the days preceding and following delivery.

METHODS

In this multicentre, nationwide, prospective and retrospective cohort study, we evaluated all pregnant women who were admitted to an ICU in Israel with severe COVID-19 pneumonitis from the 13th week of gestation to the 1st week postpartum. We excluded pregnant patients in which the ICU admission was unrelated to severe COVID-19 pneumonitis. We assessed maternal and neonatal outcomes and longitudinal clinical and laboratory ICU data. The primary overall outcome was maternal outcome (worst of the following: no invasive positive pressure ventilation [IPPV], use of IPPV, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO], or death). The primary longitudinal outcome was Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and the secondary longitudinal outcome was the novel PORCH (positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], oxygenation, respiratory support, chest x-ray, haemodynamic support) score. Patients were classified into four groups: no-delivery (pregnant at admission and no delivery during the ICU stay), postpartum (ICU admission ≥1 day after delivery), delivery-critical (pregnant at admission and receiving or at high risk of requiring IPPV at the time of delivery), or delivery-non-critical (pregnant at admission and not critically ill at the time of delivery).

FINDINGS

From Feb 1, 2020, to Jan 31, 2022, 84 patients were analysed: 34 patients in the no-delivery group, four in postpartum, 32 in delivery-critical, and 14 in delivery-non-critical. The delivery-critical and postpartum groups had worse outcomes than the other groups: 26 (81%) of 32 patients in the delivery-critical group and four (100%) of four patients in the postpartum group required IPPV; 12 (38%) and three (75%) patients required ECMO, and one (3%) and two (50%) patients died, respectively. The delivery-non-critical and no-delivery groups had far better outcomes than other groups: six (18%) of 34 patients and two (14%) of 14 patients required IPPV, respectively; no patients required ECMO or died. Oxygen saturation (SpO₂), SpO₂ to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) ratio (S/F ratio), partial pressure of arterial oxygen to FiO₂ ratio (P/F ratio), ROX index (S/F ratio divided by respiratory rate), and SOFA and PORCH scores were all highly predictive for adverse maternal outcome (p<0·0001). The delivery-critical group deteriorated on the day of delivery, continued to deteriorate throughout the ICU stay, and took longer to recover (ICU duration, Mantel-Cox p<0·0001), whereas the delivery-non-critical group improved rapidly following delivery. The day of delivery was a significant covariate for PORCH (p<0·0001) but not SOFA (p=0·09) scores.

INTERPRETATION

In patients who underwent delivery during their ICU stay, maternal outcome deteriorated following delivery among those defined as critical compared with non-critical patients, who improved following delivery. Interventional delivery should be considered for maternal indications before patients deteriorate and require mechanical ventilation.

FUNDING

None.

Successful Outcome of Mother and Baby in a Woman With Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy Who Required Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy

Some studies have reported increased severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection in the third trimester of pregnancy. Therefore, prenatal care in the third trimester requires careful judgment. It has been reported that extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy is useful for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia; however, the optimal timing for the initiation of ECMO is controversial because the risks and benefits to the mother and fetus require careful consideration. We report a good outcome for mother and baby in a pregnant woman with severe COVID-19 pneumonia at 29 weeks gestation, who underwent urgent delivery and required ECMO therapy. A 34-year-old woman tested positive for COVID-19 at 27 weeks gestation. Despite treatment with remdesivir and prednisolone, her respiratory condition worsened. Consequently, she underwent emergent endotracheal intubation at 28 weeks and 2 days. Although the PaO₂/FiO₂ (P/F ratio) improved temporarily after endotracheal intubation, her respiratory condition progressively worsened. At 29 weeks gestation, an emergency cesarean section was performed and ECMO was initiated the next day. Although hematoma was observed after ECMO initiation, her respiratory condition improved. She was discharged home 54 days after the cesarean delivery without any complications. The neonate was intubated and transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit and was ultimately discharged home without any complications. Considering the risks and benefits of ECMO for the mother and fetus in the third trimester, ECMO should be initiated after delivery for better outcomes. The P/F ratio may be useful for an appropriate decision regarding delivery and the initiation of ECMO.