Cochlear implantation in a Mandarin Chinese-speaking child with auditory neuropathy

Systematic Literature Review and Early Benefit of Cochlear Implantation in Two Pediatric Auditory Neuropathy Cases

Approximately 1 in 10 children with hearing loss is affected by auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). People who have ANSD usually have great difficulty understanding speech or communicating. However, it is possible for these patients to have audiograms that may indicate profound hearing loss up to normal hearing. This disorder is prognosed with positive, intact or present otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and/or cochlear microphonics (CM) as well as abnormal or absent auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Treatment methods include conventional hearing aids as well as cochlear implants. Cochlear implants (CI) usually promise better speech understanding for ANSD patients. We performed a systematic literature review aiming to show what improvements can effectively be achieved with cochlear implants in children with ANSD and compare this with our experience with two cases of ANSD implanted at our clinic. The retrospective review of two young CI patients diagnosed with ANSD during infancy demonstrated improvements over time in speech development communicated by their parents.

Language Outcomes Using Hearing Aids in Children with Auditory Dys-Synchrony

There is a considerable debate on the use of hearing aid in children with auditory dys-synchrony (AD). To current date there are no similar Studies which show the effect of acoustic amplification on outcomes on speech and language development in children with AD are found in the literature. Thus, in the present study three children diagnosed to have AD were recruited and subjected to hearing aid trial and fitting based on the late latency response thresholds. Ranging from 7 months to 41 months of intervention period, each child's language age was reassessed and compared with that of their pre-therapy language age. The comparison showed a good improvement in receptive age, though the children had moderate to severe degree of hearing loss. But their expressive age was significantly delayed irrespective of their age of identification and duration of intervention. Thus the delay in expression with a good amount of improvement in reception can be a characteristic of an AD child with amplification.

Audiologic management of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder in children: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

This review summarizes current evidence related to the audiologic management of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD).

METHOD

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in 25 electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, and ERIC) using key words such as auditory neuropathy, auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony, and hearing loss. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria by addressing 1 or more of 8 clinical questions. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality, and data regarding participant, intervention, and outcome variables are reported.

RESULTS

Fifteen of the 18 studies addressed the use of cochlear implantation, and 4 addressed conventional acoustic amplification. All participants demonstrated improved auditory performance; however, all 18 studies were considered exploratory, and many had methodological limitations.

CONCLUSION

The clinical evidence related to intervention for ANSD is at a very preliminary stage. Additional research is needed to address the efficacy of acoustic amplification and cochlear implantation in children with ANSD and the impact of this disorder on developmental outcomes.

Auditory neuropathy: endocochlear lesion or temporal processing impairment? Implications for diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony, characterized by absent auditory brainstem responses, normal otoacoustic emissions or cochlear microphonics, and word discrimination disproportional to the pure-tone audiogram, may be accompanied by perceptual consequences that could jeopardize language acquisition in affected children. However, the related evidence is constantly changing leading to a serious debate. The aim of the present paper is to review the current knowledge on auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony, and to present the therapeutic strategies that can be employed in its management, taking into account the potentially underlying pathophysiology.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Literature review from Medline and database sources. Related books were also included.

STUDY SELECTION

Controlled clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, nested-based case-control and analytical family studies, laboratory and electrophysiological studies, animal models, case-reports, joint statements and review articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony, in contrast to what is widely believed, is a very frequent disease, responsible for approximately 8% of newly diagnosed cases of hearing loss in children per year. Hyperbilirubinemia and hypoxia represent major risk factors, whereas generalized neuropathic disorders, or a genetic substrate involving the otoferlin gene, are responsible for the phenotype of auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony in certain cases. Auditory nerve myelinopathy and/or desynchrony of neural discharges are the most probable underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Genetic testing may be helpful in cases of non-syndromic prelingual children. Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony management aims at restoring the compromised processing of auditory information, either through conventional amplification and/or alternative forms of communication, or by cochlear implantation (combined with intensive speech and language therapy).

CONCLUSION

Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony is more frequent than considered in the past, especially amongst hearing-impaired children. Accurate diagnosis, based on subjective and objective hearing assessment techniques (including the various electrophysiological assessment measures), and timely treatment of the affected children is of paramount importance, with hearing aids, intensive speech and language therapy (and sign language when indicated) providing the mainstay of habilitation, and cochlear implantation representing a valid therapeutic alternative.

OTOF mutations revealed by genetic analysis of hearing loss families including a potential temperature sensitive auditory neuropathy allele

INTRODUCTION

The majority of hearing loss in children can be accounted for by genetic causes. Non-syndromic hearing loss accounts for 80% of genetic hearing loss in children, with mutations in DFNB1/GJB2 being by far the most common cause. Among the second tier genetic causes of hearing loss in children are mutations in the DFNB9/OTOF gene.

METHODS

In total, 65 recessive non-syndromic hearing loss families were screened by genotyping for association with the DFNB9/OTOF gene. Families with genotypes consistent with linkage or uninformative for linkage to this gene region were further screened for mutations in the 48 known coding exons of otoferlin.

RESULTS

Eight OTOF pathological variants were discovered in six families. Of these, Q829X was found in two families. We also noted 23 other coding variant, believed to have no pathology. A previously published missense allele I515T was found in the heterozygous state in an individual who was observed to be temperature sensitive for the auditory neuropathy phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Mutations in OTOF cause both profound hearing loss and a type of hearing loss where otoacoustic emissions are spared called auditory neuropathy.