Incapacitating hypersensitivity to one's own body sounds due to a dehiscence of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal. A case report

Hearing Results after Transmastoid Superior Semicircular Canal Plugging for Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The transmastoid plugging of a superior semicircular canal is considered a safe and effective technique for the management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the postoperative hearing outcomes after the transmastoid plugging of the superior semicircular canal. Search method and data sources: A systematic database search was performed on the following databases until 30 January 2023: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, ICTRP, and clinicaltrials.gov. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the pooled data were conducted. We also included a consecutive case series with SCDS for those who underwent transmastoid plugging treatment at our clinic.

RESULTS

We identified 643 citations and examined 358 full abstracts and 88 full manuscripts. A total of 16 studies were eligible for the systematic review and 11 studies for the meta-analysis. Furthermore, 159 ears (152 patients) were included. The postoperative mean air conduction threshold remained unchanged (mean difference, 2.89 dB; 95% CI: -0.05, 5.84 dB, p = 0.58), while the mean bone conduction threshold was significantly worse (mean difference, -3.53 dB; 95% CI, -6.1, -0.95 dB, p = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

The transmastoid plugging technique for superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome, although minimally worsening the inner ear threshold, is a safe procedure in terms of hearing preservation and satisfactory symptom relief.

Biomechanics of Third Window Syndrome

Third window syndrome describes a set of vestibular and auditory symptoms that arise when a pathological third mobile window is present in the bony labyrinth of the inner ear. The pathological mobile window (or windows) adds to the oval and round windows, disrupting normal auditory and vestibular function by altering biomechanics of the inner ear. The most commonly occurring third window syndrome arises from superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD), where a section of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal is absent or thinned (near-dehiscence). The presentation of SSCD syndrome is well characterized by clinical audiological and vestibular tests. In this review, we describe how the third compliant window introduced by a SSCD alters the biomechanics of the inner ear and thereby leads to vestibular and auditory symptoms. Understanding the biomechanical origins of SSCD further provides insight into other third window syndromes and the potential of restoring function or reducing symptoms through surgical repair.

Ambient Pressure Tympanometry Wave Patterns in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

Importance: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a treatable condition, but current diagnostic modalities have numerous limitations. Clinicians would benefit from an additional tool for diagnostic workup that is both rapid and widely available. Objective: To assess the utility of ambient pressure tympanometry (APT) in the diagnostic workup of SSCD by determining the sensitivity and specificity of APT for SSCD in comparison to other diagnostic modalities. Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent APT and temporal bone computerized tomography (CT) scans from May 2017 to July 2018. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Participants: APT was performed as part of routine audiological testing on adult patients. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who received both APT and temporal bone CT scans, and divided ears into SSCD and non-SSCD groups based on the presence or absence of radiographic SSCD. Ears with other radiographic findings that could affect tympanic membrane compliance were excluded. Exposures: All patients in this study underwent APT and temporal bone CT scans. Some patients also underwent pure tone audiometry and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and risk ratio of APT for SSCD. Secondary outcome measures include sensitivity of VEMPs and supranormal hearing thresholds. Results: We describe 52 patients (70 ears) who underwent APT and CT imaging (mean age 47.1 years, 67.1% female). APT detected SSCD with 66.7% sensitivity and 72.1% specificity. In symptomatic patients, sensitivity was 71.4% and specificity was 75%. VEMPs performed best at detecting SSCD when defining a positive test as oVEMP amplitude >17 μV, with a sensitivity of 68.2%, similar to APT (p > 0.99). The combination of APT and VEMPs increased sensitivity to 88.9%, better than APT alone (p = 0.031) and trending toward better than VEMPs alone (p = 0.063). Conclusions and Relevance: Rhythmic wave patterns on APT are associated with SSCD and may raise suspicion for this condition in conjunction with consistent results on other diagnostic modalities. Although clinical utility requires confirmation in a larger prospective study, APT is a simple, rapid, and widely available tool warranting further study.

Hearing eyeball and/or eyelid movements on the side of a unilateral superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Hearing of eyeball movements has been reported in superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD), but not hearing of eyelid movements. Our main objective was to report the hearing of eyeball and/or eyelid movements in unilateral SSCD. Our secondary objective was to access its specificity to SSCD and discuss the underlying mechanism. Six patients with SSCD who could hear their eyeball and/or eyelid movements were retrospectively reviewed. With the aim of comparisons, eight patients with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA), who share the same mechanism of an abnormal third window, were questioned on their ability to hear their eyeball and/or eyelid movements. Three patients with SSCD could hear both their eyeball and eyelid movements as a soft low-pitch friction sound. Two patients with SSCD could hear only their eyelid movements, one of whom after the surgery of a traumatic chronic subdural hematoma. The latter remarked that every gently tapping on the skin covering the burr-hole was heard in his dehiscent ear as the sound produced when banging on a drum, in keeping with a direct transmission of the sound to the inner ear via the cerebrospinal fluid. One patient with SSCD, who could hear only his eyeball movements, had other disabling symptoms deserving operation through a middle fossa approach with an immediate relief of his symptoms. None of the eight patients with EVA could hear his/her eyeball or eyelid movements. Hearing of eyeball and/or eyelid movements is highly suggestive of a SSCD and do not seem to occur in EVA. In case of radiological SSCD, clinicians should search for hearing of eyeball and/or eyelid movements providing arguments for a symptomatic dehiscence. The underlying mechanism is discussed particularly the role of a cerebrospinal fluid transmission.

Outcomes of middle fossa craniotomy for the repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a rare defect of the arcuate eminence that causes an abnormal connection between the superior semicircular canal and middle cranial fossa. Patients often present with a variety of auditory and vestibular symptoms. Trigger avoidance is the initial strategy, but surgery may be necessary in debilitating cases. We retrospectively reviewed SSCD patients undergoing repair via a middle fossa craniotomy between March 2011 and September 2015. Forty-nine patients undergoing 58 surgeries were identified. Autophony was the most common symptom at presentation (n=44; 90%). Mean follow-up was 10.9months, with 100% of patients reporting resolution of at least one symptom. Aural fullness was the most commonly resolved symptom following surgical repair (n=19/22; 86%). Hearing loss (n=11/25; 44%) and tinnitus (n=11/38; 29%) were the most common symptoms to persist following surgery. The most common symptom to develop after surgery was disequilibrium (n=4/18; 22%). Upon comparing the overall pre-operative and post-operative groups, the number of patients with autophony (p<0.0001), aural fullness (p=0.0006), hearing loss (p=0.0119), disequilibrium (p=0.0002), sound- and pressure-induced vertigo (p<0.0001), and tinnitus (p<0.0001) were significantly different. Improved clinical outcomes were demonstrated in patients undergoing SSCD repair through a middle cranial fossa approach. The most common presenting symptom (autophony) was also most likely to resolve after surgery. Hearing loss is less amenable to surgical correction. Disequilibrium developed in a small number of patients after repair.

Clinical outcomes of middle fossa craniotomy for superior semicircular canal dehiscence repair

OBJECTIVE Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a rare disorder characterized by the formation of a third opening in the inner ear between the superior semicircular canal and the middle cranial fossa. Aberrant communication through this opening causes a syndrome of hearing loss, pulsatile tinnitus, disequilibrium, and autophony. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes of a single-institution series of patients with SSCD undergoing surgical repair by the same otolaryngologist and neurosurgeon. METHODS All patients who underwent SSCD repair at the University of California, Los Angeles, between March 2011 and November 2014 were included. All patients had their SSCD repaired via middle fossa craniotomy by the same otolaryngologist and neurosurgeon. Outcomes were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. RESULTS A total of 18 patients with a mean age of 56.2 years (range 27-84 years) and an average follow-up of 5.0 months (range 0.2-21.8 months) underwent 21 cases of SSCD repair. Following treatment, all patients (100%) reported resolution in ≥ 1 symptom associated with SSCD. Autophony (p = 0.0005), tinnitus (p = 0.0059), and sound- and/or pressure-induced dizziness (p = 0.0437) showed significant symptomatic resolution. Following treatment, 29% (2/7) of patients developed imbalance, 20% (1/5) of patients developed sound- and/or pressure-induced dizziness, and 18% (2/11) of patients developed aural fullness. Among patients with improved symptoms following surgical repair, none reported recurrence of symptoms at subsequent follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS SSCD remains an underdiagnosed and undertreated condition. Surgical repair of SSCD using a middle fossa craniotomy is associated with a high rate of symptom resolution. Continued investigation using a larger patient cohort and longer-term follow-up could further demonstrate the effectiveness of using middle fossa craniotomy for SSCD repair.

Otologic disorders causing dizziness, including surgery for vestibular disorders

This chapter will focus on vertigo/dizziness due to inner-ear malformations, labyrinthine fistula, otosclerosis, infectious processes, and autoimmune inner-ear disorders. Inner-ear malformation due to dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal is the most recently described inner-ear malformation. Vertigo/dizziness is typically induced by sound and pressure stimuli and can be associated with auditory symptoms (conductive or mixed hearing loss). Labyrinthine fistula, except after surgery for otosclerosis, in the context of trauma or chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma, still remains a challenging disorder due to multiple uncertainties regarding diagnostic and management strategies. Otosclerosis typically manifests with auditory symptoms and conductive or mixed hearing loss on audiometry. Vertigo/dizziness is rare in nonoperated otosclerosis and should draw clinical attention to an inner-ear malformation. Computed tomography scan confirms otosclerosis in most cases and should rule out an inner-ear malformation, avoiding needless middle-ear surgical exploration. Labyrinth involvement after an infectious process is unilateral when it complicates a middle-ear infection but can be bilateral after meningitis. Labyrinth involvement due to an inflammatory disease is a challenging issue, particularly when restricted to the inner ear. The diagnosis relies on the bilateral and rapid aggravation of audiovestibular symptoms that will not respond to conventional therapy but to immunosuppressive drugs.

Quantification of hearing loss associated with superior semi-circular canal dehiscence

INTRODUCTION

Superior semi-circular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a known cause of hearing loss. This study quantifies hearing loss in SSCD ears in a frequency-specific fashion.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of English language literature pertaining to SSCD was performed, with extraction and evaluation of available human audiometric data. Our own institution's case series of SSCD patients was also similarly analysed. Hearing loss in SSCD ears was compared to same patient control ears and to age-matched normative audiometric data.

RESULTS

Ears with SSCD had statistically significant worse hearing as compared to both normative data and to own normal ear controls at 2000 Hz and below. The effect appears to diminish with increasing frequency.

DISCUSSION

The presence of statistically significant conductive hearing loss in the low frequencies was confirmed for SSCD ears. SSCD may also predispose ears to high frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Characteristics and management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Objectives To review the characteristic symptoms of superior semicircular canal dehiscence, testing and imaging of the disease, and the current treatment and surgical options. Results and Conclusions Symptoms of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) include autophony, inner ear conductive hearing loss, Hennebert sign, and sound-induced episodic vertigo and disequilibrium (Tullio phenomenon), among others. Potential etiologies noted for canal dehiscence include possible developmental abnormalities, congenital defects, chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma, fibrous dysplasia, and high-riding jugular bulb. Computed tomography (CT), vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, Valsalva maneuvers, and certain auditory testing may prove useful in the detection and evaluation of dehiscence syndrome. Multislice temporal bone CT examinations are normally performed with fine-cut (0.5- to 0.6-mm) collimation reformatted to the plane of the superior canal such that images are parallel and orthogonal to the plane. For the successful alleviation of auditory and vestibular symptoms, a bony dehiscence can be surgically resurfaced, plugged, or capped through a middle fossa craniotomy or the transmastoid approach. SSCD should only be surgically treated in patients who exhibit clinical manifestations.

Semicircular canal dehiscence in HR multislice computed tomography: distribution, frequency, and clinical relevance

The literature about bony defects in the semicircular canal system is highly inconsistent. Therefore, we analyzed a series of 700 high-resolution multislice CT examinations of the temporal bone for semicircular canal dehiscencies. An unselected group of ENT patients with different clinical symptoms and variable age was chosen. We found semicircular canal dehiscence in 9.6% of temporal bones, superior semicircular canal was affected mostly (8%), less common posterior semicircular canal (1.2%); only in 3 cases (0.4%), lateral semicircular canal showed dehiscence. In 60% of SSC dehiscence, we registered bilateral manifestation. The so-called "third mobile window" in semicircular canal dehiscence causes a great variety of clinical symptoms like vertigo, nystagmus, oscillopsies, hearing loss, tinnitus and autophonia. Comparison with anatomic studies shows that CT examination implies the risk of considerable overestimation; this fact emphasizes the important role of clinical and neurophysiological testing.

Superior Canal Dehiscence Effect on Hearing Thresholds

Objective. Superior semicircular dehiscence syndrome is associated with vestibular symptoms and an air–bone gap component in the audiogram, apparently caused by the creation of a pathological bony “third window” in the superior semicircular canal. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in auditory air- and bone-conduction thresholds to low- and high-frequency stimuli in an animal model of a bony fenestration facing the aerated mastoid cavity.

Study Design. Anatomic, audiological.

Setting. Tertiary university-affiliated medical center.

Animals. A small hole was drilled in the bony apical portion of the superior semicircular canal facing the mastoid bulla/cavity, with preservation of the membranous labyrinth, in 5 adult-size fat sand rats.

Main Outcome Measures. Auditory brain stem responses to clicks and 1-kHz tone bursts delivered by air and bone conduction before surgery, after opening the bulla, and after fenestration.

Results. After fenestration, a significant air–bone gap was measured in response to clicks (mean ± standard deviation, 37 ± 5.8 dB) and bursts (mean ± standard deviation, 34 ± 14.5 dB). The gap was attributable solely to the significant deterioration in air-conduction thresholds, in the absence of a significant change in bone conduction thresholds. The pattern of auditory brain response changes closely resembled that reported for middle ear dysfunction, namely, an increase in absolute latency of waves I, III, and V without significant alterations in interpeak latency differences.

Conclusions. Bony fenestration of the superior semicircular canal toward an aerated cavity in a rodent model mimics the auditory loss pattern of patients with superior semicircular dehiscence syndrome. The dehiscent membrane accounts for the auditory changes.

Superior canal dehiscence in a patient with three failed stapedectomy operations for otosclerosis: a case report

INTRODUCTION

This case illustrates that superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome can be associated with a "pseudo"-conductive hearing loss, a symptom that overlaps with the clinical appearance of otosclerosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 48-year-old German Caucasian woman presenting with hearing loss on the left side and vertigo. She had undergone three previous stapedectomies for hearing improvement. Reformatted high-resolution computed tomographic scanning and the patient's history confirmed the diagnosis of concurrent canal dehiscence syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Failure of hearing improvement after otosclerosis surgery may indicate an alternative underlying diagnosis which should be explored by further appropriate evaluation.

Vestibular pathology presenting as behavioral problems in a child with Down Syndrome: a case report

Here we present a case of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) in a non-verbal 17-year-old male patient with trisomy 21 that presented with behavioral problems, instead of the more typical symptoms of episodic noise-induced vertigo. SSCD syndrome is characterized by sound-, or pressure-induced vertigo. Patients often complain of vertigo or oscillopsia evoked by loud noises, which may be either external sounds or those elicited by the patients themselves when they are speaking. In cases of SSCD, auditory testing will typically reveal a conductive hearing loss on the affected side while high-resolution temporal bone computed-tomography will demonstrate bony dehiscence overlying the ipsilateral superior semicircular canal. Here we present a report of SSCD in a patient with Down Syndrome who was without speech and reacted to noise stimulation with behavioral outbursts. In this case, simple modifications, such as noise avoidance and hearing protection were able to effect positive changes in behavior and improve social interactions. This case underscores the importance of a broad differential diagnosis, and the need to consider alternate presentations, in children with Down Syndrome or any child who is otherwise unable to express himself.

Transmission pathways of vibratory stimulation as measured by subjective thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions

To clarify the contribution of the skull contents to the transmission of bone vibratory stimuli, and to examine the characteristics of such stimuli, we compared auditory thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels with a bone vibrator placed on various sites of the head, including the eye. The best audiometric thresholds and the highest DPOAE levels were obtained with the vibrator placed on the mastoid of the measuring side, or on the "ultrasound-window" of the temple. The audiometric thresholds obtained with the bone vibrator on the eye were similar to those of the forehead, and about 10 dB higher than at the best sites. DPOAEs were clearly present when elicited by a combination of air-conducted stimuli presented through an insert earphone and with the bone vibrator placed on the eye. These results indicate that vibratory sounds can be transmitted through the skull contents to the inner ear. The intracranial transmission pathway of the vibratory stimuli may play a significant role, particularly at low frequencies, and possibly also when the vibratory stimuli are applied on the skull bone.

Conductive hearing loss caused by third-window lesions of the inner ear

BACKGROUND

Various authors have described conductive hearing loss (CHL), defined as an air-bone gap on audiometry, in patients without obvious middle ear pathologic findings. Recent investigations have suggested that many of these cases are due to disorders of the inner ear, resulting in pathologic third windows.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of lesions of the inner ear resulting in a CHL due to a third-window mechanism. The mechanism of the CHL is explained along with a classification scheme for these disorders. We also discuss methods for diagnosis of these disorders.

DATA SOURCES

The data were compiled from a review of the literature and recent published research on middle and inner ear mechanics from our laboratory.

CONCLUSION

A number of disparate disorders affecting the labyrinth can produce CHL by acting as a pathologic third window in the inner ear. The common denominator is that these conditions result in a mobile window on the scala vestibuli side of the cochlear partition. The CHL results by the dual mechanism of worsening of air conduction thresholds and improvement of bone conduction thresholds. Such lesions may be anatomically discrete or diffuse. Anatomically discrete lesions may be classified by location: semicircular canals (superior, lateral, or posterior canal dehiscence), bony vestibule (large vestibular aqueduct syndrome, other inner ear malformations), or the cochlea (carotid-cochlear dehiscence, X-linked deafness with stapes gusher, etc.). An example of an anatomically diffuse lesion is Paget disease, which may behave as a distributed or diffuse third window. Third-window lesions should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CHL in patients with an intact tympanic membrane and an aerated, otherwise healthy, middle ear. Clues to suspect such a lesion include a low-frequency air-bone gap with supranormal thresholds for bone conduction, and presence of acoustic reflexes, vestibular evoked myogenic responses, or otoacoustic emission responses despite the CHL. Imaging studies can help confirm the diagnosis.

Clinical and Diagnostic Characterization of Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

OBJECTIVE:: To identify otologic and audiologic characteristics of superior (and posterior) semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD). STUDY DESIGN:: Retrospective case review. SETTING:: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS:: Sixty-five adult patients were evaluated for SCD; 26 of 65 (35 ears) had dehiscence. INTERVENTION(S):: Otologic examination, high-resolution computerized tomography (CT), air and bone audiometry, tympanometry, acoustic reflex, and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):: Imaging demonstrating canal dehiscence, preferentially including Poschel and Stenvers reconstructions. Audiologic findings of pseudoconductive loss, intact ipsilateral stapedial reflex, and abnormally low VEMP thresholds. RESULTS:: The most common presenting complaints were autophony of voice and a "blocked ear" (94%), mimicking patulous eustachian tube, including relief with Valsalva or supine position (50%), but without autophony of nasal breathing. Pseudoconductive loss was found in 86% of dehiscence ears, and 60% (21 of 35) of these ears had better than 0-dB-hearing-loss bone conduction thresholds at 250 and/or 500 Hz. Acoustic reflex was present in 89%. Assuming CT as the criterion standard, VEMP resulted in 91.4% sensitivity and 95.8% specificity. One false-positive CT, with abnormal VEMP, resulted in surgical explorations negative for superior SCD but positive for posterior SCD. CONCLUSION:: Semicircular canal dehiscence may present with various symptoms such as autophony, ear blockage, and dizziness/vertigo. A combination of high-resolution CT and audiologic testing is recommended for diagnosis. Low-frequency conductive loss with better than 0 dB hearing level (HL) bone conduction threshold and normal tympanometry, with intact acoustic reflexes, are audiologic signs of SCD. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential is highly sensitive and specific for SCD, possibly better than CT.