Partial withdrawal of deeply inserted cochlear electrodes: observations of two patients

Relationship between electrode position and temporal modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users: Are close electrodes always better?

Temporal modulation sensitivity has been studied extensively for cochlear implant (CI) users due to its strong correlation to speech recognition outcomes. Previous studies reported that temporal modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) vary across the tonotopic axis and attributed this variation to patchy neural survival. However, correlates of neural health identified in animal models depend on electrode position in humans. Nonetheless, the relationship between MDT and electrode location has not been explored. We tested 13 ears for the effect of distance on modulation sensitivity, specifically targeting the question of whether electrodes closer to the modiolus are universally beneficial. Participants in this study were postlingually deafened and users of Cochlear Nucleus CIs. The distance of each electrode from the medial wall (MW) of the cochlea and mid-modiolar axis (MMA) was measured from scans obtained using computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The distance measures were correlated with slopes of spatial tuning curves measured on selected electrodes to investigate if electrode position accounts, at least in part, for the width of neural excitation. In accordance with previous findings, electrode position explained 24% of the variance in slopes of the spatial tuning curves. All functioning electrodes were also measured for MDTs. Five ears showed a positive correlation between MDTs and at least one distance measure across the array; 6 ears showed negative correlations and the remaining two ears showed no relationship. The ears showing positive MDT-distance correlations, thus benefiting from electrodes being close to the neural elements, were those who performed better on the two speech recognition measures, i.e., speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and recognition of the AzBio sentences. These results could suggest that ears able to take advantage of the proximal placement of electrodes are likely to have better speech recognition outcomes. Previous histological studies of humans demonstrated that speech recognition is correlated with spiral ganglion cell counts. Alternatively, ears with good speech recognition outcomes may have good overall neural health, which is a precondition for close electrodes to produce spatially confined neural excitation patterns that facilitate modulation sensitivity. These findings suggest that the methods to reduce channel interaction, e.g., perimodiolar electrode array or current focusing, may only be beneficial for a subgroup of CI users. Additionally, it suggests that estimating neural survival preoperatively is important for choosing the most appropriate electrode array type (perimodiolar vs. lateral wall) for optimal implant function.

Investigation of the effect of cochlear implant electrode length on speech comprehension in quiet and noise compared with the results with users of electro-acoustic-stimulation, a retrospective analysis

Objectives

This investigation evaluated the effect of cochlear implant (CI) electrode length on speech comprehension in quiet and noise and compare the results with those of EAS users.

Methodes

91 adults with some degree of residual hearing were implanted with a FLEX²⁰, FLEX²⁴, or FLEX²⁸ electrode. Some subjects were postoperative electric-acoustic-stimulation (EAS) users; the other subjects were in the groups of electric stimulation-only (ES-only).

Speech perception was tested in quiet and noise at 3 and 6 months of ES or EAS use. Speech comprehension results were analyzed and correlated to electrode length.

Results

While the FLEX²⁰ ES and FLEX²⁴ ES groups were still in their learning phase between the 3 to 6 months interval, the FLEX²⁸ ES group was already reaching a performance plateau at the three months appointment yielding remarkably high test scores. EAS subjects using FLEX²⁰ or FLEX²⁴ electrodes outscored ES-only subjects with the same short electrodes on all 3 tests at each interval, reaching significance with FLEX²⁰ ES and FLEX²⁴ ES subjects on all 3 tests at the 3-months interval and on 2 tests at the 6- months interval. Amongst ES-only subjects at the 3- months interval, FLEX²⁸ ES subjects significantly outscored FLEX²⁰ ES subjects on all 3 tests and the FLEX²⁴ ES subjects on 2 tests. At the-6 months interval, FLEX²⁸ ES subjects still exceeded the other ES-only subjects although the difference did not reach significance.

Conclusions

Among ES-only users, the FLEX²⁸ ES users had the best speech comprehension scores, at the 3- months appointment and tendentially at the 6 months appointment. EAS users showed significantly better speech comprehension results compared to ES-only users with the same short electrodes.

A new software tool to optimize frequency table selection for cochlear implants

HYPOTHESIS

When cochlear implant (CI) users are allowed to self-select the "most intelligible" frequency-to-electrode table, some of them choose one that differs from the default frequency table that is normally used in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

CIs reproduce the tonotopicity of normal cochleas using frequency-to-electrode tables that assign stimulation of more basal electrodes to higher frequencies and more apical electrodes to lower frequency sounds. Current audiologic practice uses a default frequency-to-electrode table for most patients. However, individual differences in cochlear size, neural survival, and electrode positioning may result in different tables sounding most intelligible to different patients. No clinical tools currently exist to facilitate this fitting.

METHODS

A software tool was designed that enables CI users to self-select a most intelligible frequency table. Users explore a 2-dimensional space that represents a range of different frequency tables. Unlike existing tools, this software enables users to interactively audition speech processed by different frequency tables and quickly identify a preferred one. Pilot testing was performed in 11 long-term, postlingually deaf CI users.

RESULTS

The software tool was designed, developed, tested, and debugged. Patients successfully used the tool to sample frequency tables and to self-select tables deemed most intelligible, which for approximately half of the users differed from the clinical default.

CONCLUSION

A software tool allowing CI users to self-select frequency-to-electrode tables may help in fitting postlingually deaf users. This novel approach may transform current methods of CI fitting.

Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus

This study examines patterns of neural activity in response to single biphasic electrical pulses, presented alone or following a forward masking pulse train, delivered by a cochlear implant. Recordings were made along the tonotopic axis of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) in ketamine/xylazine anesthetized guinea pigs. The partial tripolar electrode configuration was used, which provided a systematic way to vary the tonotopic extent of ICC activation between monopolar (broad) and tripolar (narrow) extremes while maintaining the same peak of activation. The forward masking paradigm consisted of a 200 ms masker pulse train (1017 pulses per second) followed 10 ms later by a single-pulse probe stimulus; the current fraction of the probe was set to 0 (monopolar), 1 (tripolar), or 0.5 (hybrid), and the fraction of the masker was fixed at 0.5. Forward masking tuning profiles were derived from the amount of masking current required to just suppress the activity produced by a fixed-level probe. These profiles were sharper for more focused probe configurations, approximating the pattern of neural activity elicited by single (non-masked) pulses. The result helps to bridge the gap between previous findings in animals and recent psychophysical data.

Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of a threshold measure, made with a restricted electrode configuration, to identify channels exhibiting relatively poor spatial selectivity. With a restricted electrode configuration, channel-to-channel variability in threshold may reflect variations in the interface between the electrodes and auditory neurons (i.e., nerve survival, electrode placement, and tissue impedance). These variations in the electrode-neuron interface should also be reflected in psychophysical tuning curve (PTC) measurements. Specifically, it is hypothesized that high single-channel thresholds obtained with the spatially focused partial tripolar (pTP) electrode configuration are predictive of wide or tip-shifted PTCs.

DESIGN

Data were collected from five cochlear implant listeners implanted with the HiRes90k cochlear implant (Advanced Bionics Corp., Sylmar, CA). Single-channel thresholds and most comfortable listening levels were obtained for stimuli that varied in presumed electrical field size by using the pTP configuration for which a fraction of current (sigma) from a center-active electrode returns through two neighboring electrodes and the remainder through a distant indifferent electrode. Forward-masked PTCs were obtained for channels with the highest, lowest, and median tripolar (sigma = 1 or 0.9) thresholds. The probe channel and level were fixed and presented with either the monopolar (sigma = 0) or a more focused pTP (sigma > or = 0.55) configuration. The masker channel and level were varied, whereas the configuration was fixed to sigma = 0.5. A standard, three-interval, two-alternative forced choice procedure was used for thresholds and masked levels.

RESULTS

Single-channel threshold and variability in threshold across channels systematically increased as the compensating current, sigma, increased and the presumed electrical field became more focused. Across subjects, channels with the highest single-channel thresholds, when measured with a narrow, pTP stimulus, had significantly broader PTCs than the lowest threshold channels. In two subjects, the tips of the tuning curves were shifted away from the probe channel. Tuning curves were also wider for the monopolar probes than with pTP probes for both the highest and lowest threshold channels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that single-channel thresholds measured with a restricted stimulus can be used to identify cochlear implant channels with poor spatial selectivity. Channels having wide or tip-shifted tuning characteristics would likely not deliver the appropriate spectral information to the intended auditory neurons, leading to suboptimal perception. As a clinical tool, quick identification of impaired channels could lead to patient-specific mapping strategies and result in improved speech and music perception.

Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes

HYPOTHESIS

Suboptimal cochlear implant (CI) electrode array placement may reduce presentation of coded information to the central nervous system and, consequently, limit speech recognition.

BACKGROUND

Generally, mean speech reception scores for CI recipients are similar across different CI systems, yet large outcome variation is observed among recipients implanted with the same device. These observations suggest significant recipient-dependent factors influence speech reception performance. This study examines electrode array insertion depth and scalar placement as recipient-dependent factors affecting outcome.

METHODS

Scalar location and depth of insertion of intracochlear electrodes were measured in 14 patients implanted with Advanced Bionics electrode arrays and whose word recognition scores varied broadly. Electrode position was measured using computed tomographic images of the cochlea and correlated with stable monosyllabic word recognition scores.

RESULTS

Electrode placement, primarily in terms of depth of insertion and scala tympani versus scala vestibuli location, varies widely across subjects. Lower outcome scores are associated with greater insertion depth and greater number of contacts being located in scala vestibuli. Three patterns of scalar placement are observed suggesting variability in insertion dynamics arising from surgical technique.

CONCLUSION

A significant portion of variability in word recognition scores across a broad range of performance levels of CI subjects is explained by variability in scalar location and insertion depth of the electrode array. We suggest that this variability in electrode placement can be reduced and average speech reception improved by better selection of cochleostomy sites, revised insertion approaches, and control of insertion depth during surgical placement of the array.