Long-term results of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy

Endoscopic dacrocystorhinostomy: Reasons for failure and possible solutions

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy is a well-established procedure with high success rate. There are multiple causes of failure of this procedure which affect surgical success.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze causes of failure in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and ascertain methods to overcome causes of failure.

METHODS

After approval from the Institutional Review Board a retrospective review of 119 patients was undertaken over an 11-year period from 2008 to 2018.

SETTING

A tertiary care hospital in North India.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients presenting to the Otorhinolaryngology out-patient department and diagnosed as failed endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy cases.

INTERVENTION

After thorough preoperative workup consisting of history, examination and diagnostic nasal endoscopy, patients underwent revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

RESULTS

After exclusion of 2 cases, 117 patients were included in the study. The mean age at presentation was 31.4 years. Number of previous surgeries: 92 patients had had one surgery, 20 patients had had two surgeries, 5 patients had had three surgeries and 9 patients had had multiple surgeries before presentation. All patients (100%) had epiphora, 75 (64.1%) patients had associated discharge and 4 (3.4%) had persistent medial canthal swelling. Duration of symptoms following previous surgery was 1-6 weeks. Commonest cause of failure was incomplete sac exposure in 117/117 cases (100%). Other causes were cicatricial closure of ostium in 47 (40.1%), synechiae in 20 (17%), canalicular obstruction in 4(3.4%), lacrimal sac diverticulum in 3 (2.5%), nasal polyps in 2 (1.7%), concha with adhesion in 2 (1.7%), septal deviation in 2 (1.7%) cases.

CONCLUSION

Meticulous and thorough sac exposure is the most important factor affecting surgical success. Comprehensive preoperative assessment of cases, meticulous surgical technique, and postoperative follow up are needed for successful outcomes.

Regression course of ostium granulomas under topical intranasal steroids coverage after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

This study aimed to elucidate the regression process of ostium granulomas under the usage of intranasal steroid after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). The authors retrospectively reviewed 57 patients (a total of 72 ostia) who had ostium granulomas after primary endoscopic DCR between 2011 and 2015. Topical intranasal steroid spray was applied in all the patients since postoperative day 1. Adjunctive intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injections were administered for extensive and large-sized granulomas that caused impending ostium blockage. Sequential regression of the ostium granulomas and success rates of DCR were assessed using endoscopic photos. The granulomas completely disappeared in 69 (95.8%) ostia, and the average time interval from the surgery to the disappearance was 6.9 ± 2.8 months. Anatomical and functional surgical success rates were 90.3% and 84.7%, respectively. Intralesional steroid injections for ostium granulomas did not alter the outcomes compared to topical intranasal steroid usage significantly (p = 0.445). In conclusion, we observed that, by continuing the usage of intranasal steroids, ostium granulomas disappear gradually at postoperative 6 months. The intranasal surgical manipulation of granulomas, which results in more mucosal cicatricial change and impedes patient satisfaction, can be successfully avoided.

Primary transcanalicular diode laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy: long-term success rates and risk factors for recurrence

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the long-term success rates of transcanalicular endolaser dacryocystorhinostomy (TC-DCR) surgery along with the factors that possibly affect surgical success.

METHODS

Patients (n = 300) who underwent unilateral TC-DCR operations in the department of ophthalmology of our university hospital between January 2011 and June 2021 were included in the study. The subjects were divided into 2 groups, with group 1 showing no recurrence (n = 205) and group 2 showing recurrence (n = 95).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period for the 300 patients was 26.7 ± 7.0 months (range, 11-33 months). The overall success rate was 205 of 300 (∼68%). Although, based on the univariate risk analysis, age, operative time, total laser power, tube removal time, septum deviation, fistulisation, and intraoperative hemorrhage were found to be risk factors, in multivariate risk analysis, only total laser power, septum deviation, and intraoperative bleeding were determined to be the main risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The success rate of TC-DCR was lower than that of traditional external DCR, but because TC-DCR is a minimally invasive aesthetic surgery with a short operative time, it may become a preferred option by more ophthalmologists, especially for young patients without intranasal pathology and coagulation disorders and elderly patients at risk for general anaesthesia. It should be taken into account that the chances of success are relatively lower among patients with total laser power applied during surgery, intraoperative hemorrhage, fistulization, and septum deviation. In TC-DCR, bleeding control, short operative time, and low laser power are important to achieve a high success rate. Also, 1 year after TC-DCR, even the presence of anatomic drainage may lower the functional success of patients, so follow-up should be continued.

Endoscopic "retrograde" dacryocystorhinostomy: A fast route to the lacrimal sac

Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is an established surgical technique for the management of peripheral nasolacrimal duct (NLD) obstruction. Its main points are the correct identification of the lacrimal sac and the execution of surgical procedures that allow a rapid and accurate healing of the surgical field. The main endoscopic landmarks used for the identification of the lacrimal sac are the middle turbinate and the maxillary line. However, in some cases, this procedure can be difficult due to several factors (e.g. anatomical variations, former surgery). In the present study, a variation of "classic" endoscopic DCR, named "retrograde" endoscopic endonasal DCR (rDCR), is described. rDCR is performed through the quick identification of the NLD at the level of the most anterior insertion of the inferior turbinate in the lateral nasal wall. In most cases, at this level only a very thin shell of bone is present (crack point), easily fractured by using blunt angled dissector. The duct is then followed upward along its course by removing the overlying bone in order to correctly identify the lacrimal sac and unequivocally drill along the lacrimal pathway. This technique proved to be a safe, quick and effective procedure, even in patients with difficult anatomy.

Factors involved in the success and failure of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy from our experience

INTRODUCTION

Chronic dacryocystitis is the condition secondary to permanent lacrimonasal duct stenosis (LNDS) that generates epiphora and recurrent conjunctivitis. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) is a more natural route than the external route and offers higher success rates than the laser technique. We value this centre's experience in this procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out in our centre of the medical records of adult patients undergoing EDCR due to LNDS between 1995 and 2019. The minimum follow-up period required after surgery was 6 months.

RESULTS

Over 297 months, 167 EDCR procedures were performed on 156 patients, with an average age of 65.7 ± 11.6 years and a male/female ratio of 1/1.98. The functional improvement was 86%, with an anatomical success rate of 87%. Lack of clinical improvement statistically significantly correlated with the age of the patient and the time since onset of the LNDS, the presence of concomitant systemic (especially diabetes mellitus) or ophthalmological disease, the intraoperative finding of a thickened tear sac and absence of drainage of the tear sac when marsupialised. Longer-term stent carriers in the rhinostomy had poorer outcomes. There were no postoperative complications of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

EDCR is an effective and safe technique, based on stable anatomical references. Failure rate seems to be multifactorial and should be considered in older, multipathological patients, with a long duration of the condition.

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy among the old and oldest-old populations - A case control study

OBJECTIVE

Despite increased risks of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) with age, and the continuous growth of the old population proportion, data on endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (eDCR) among the old is lacking. This study aims to evaluate long-term eDCR efficacy and safety in the old and oldest-old population.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study of patients aged 80 ≤ (oldest-old) and 65-79 (old) compared with younger controls who underwent eDCR, between 2002 and 2017. Pre-, intra- and postoperative factors were collected using an integrated hospital-community system. Success rates were analyzed and measured at the first visit following surgery (immediate success), and after five years. Demographics, comorbidities, complications rates, and outcomes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The study groups included 52 oldest-old patients (mean age 83.4 ± 3.6), 127 old patients (72.3 ± 4.14) and 142 control patients (57.8 ± 18.0). The immediate and success rates were 94.2%, 93.7% and 90.8% and five-year success rates were 80.0%, 76.6% and 80% among oldest-old, old and controls, respectively. No significant differences in success rates were found, even despite higher comorbidity rates among the study's group (96 and 92.8% vs. 63.2%, among oldest-old, old and controls respectively, p <0.001). Intra- and postoperative complications rates were low in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older population, including oldest-old and old, eDCR safety and long-term outcomes are comparable with younger patients, suggesting that eDCR should be offered to NLDO patients, regardless of age.

Applying the Exoscope to Lacrimal Surgery: Preliminary Experience

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to investigate the role of the exoscope as an assisting tool in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (e-DCR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this observational retrospective study, the application of the VITOM® exoscope was studied in a group of 21 patients undergoing mono- or bilateral DCR. The primary endpoint was to evaluate resolution of symptoms (epiphora/dacryocystitis) at the 6-month follow-up and time for surgery. Qualitative features of the exoscope (intraoperative view of the surgical field) and comparison with the typical setting for DCR were analyzed as secondary endpoints. A questionnaire was administered to surgical team members (ENT surgeon, ophthalmologist, and scrub nurse) to evaluate the perceived quality of this new technology (12 items valued as "good" = 2, "acceptable" = 1, and "not acceptable" = 0). A questionnaire score of 24 out of 24 was valued as "completely approved," score 20-23 as "moderately approved," and score ≤19 as "weakly approved." Patients were divided into 3 consecutive groups, and questionnaire scores by each team member were analyzed for tendencies. Statistical analysis was performed to test significance at p < 0.05. Local Ethical Committee approval was obtained.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between exoscope-set DCR and classic setting for concerned patient outcomes (failure rate: 3.2 vs. 3.8%, respectively, p = 0.896) and mean time for surgery (20' vs. 23', respectively, p = 0.091). The exoscope was valued by surgical team members as "completely approved" in 55.5% of cases, "moderately approved" in 39.7%, and "weakly approved" in 4.8%. Questionnaire scores by the ENT, ophthalmologist, and scrub nurse showed an average increase in the 3 consecutive groups (p = 0.119, p = 0.024, and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The exoscope is a new tool that may support e-DCR. It has no effects on symptom outcomes (epiphora/dacryocystitis) and time for surgery compared to classic DCR. Based on self-perception, this new technology was accepted by all team members.

Preliminary experience with exoscope in lacrimal surgery

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (e-DCR) is the mainstay for lacrimal sac/duct conditions. The purpose is to investigate the role of the exoscope as assisting tool in e-DCR.

METHODS

Primary endpoint were symptoms resolution (epiphora/dacryocystitis) and time for surgery. Qualitative features of the exoscope were analyzed: a questionnaire administered to the surgical team allowed to evaluate the perceived quality of this technology.

CONCLUSIONS

The exoscope is a new tool that may support e-DCR. It has comparable results on symptoms outcomes and time for surgery than classic e-DCR. This new technology was accepted by all team members and showed great teaching potential.

Infection After Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: Incidence and Implications

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is an increasingly common procedure performed by otolaryngologists. While EN-DCR has a high rate of success at relieving blockage of the lacrimal system, little is known regarding associated postoperative infection (POI) rates and risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the occurrence of postoperative orbital and rhinologic infection in a large cohort of patients undergoing EN-DCR.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 582 patients who underwent EN-DCR was performed. All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis as a single intraoperative intravenous administration and a ten-day postoperative oral course. Clinical and demographic information was reviewed, including the occurrence of acute orbital or rhinologic infection within 30 days of surgery. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with POI.

RESULTS

Fifteen of 582 patients (2.6%) developed POI following EN-DCR. The most common POI was acute rhinosinusitis (10/15, 66.7%), followed by acute dacryocystitis (2/15, 13.3%), preseptal cellulitis (2/15,13.3%), and acute bacterial conjunctivitis (1/15, 6.7%). The majority of patients (464/582, 79.7%) underwent concurrent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). In most cases (302/464, 65.1%), ESS was performed to address comorbid rhinosinusitis, whereas 7.8% (36/464) of patients underwent surgery to enhance surgical access to the lacrimal sac. Patients who underwent concurrent ESS were less likely to develop POI (OR: 0.17, CI: 0.04-0.80, p < 0.05). Evidence of mucopurulence at surgery increased the likelihood of POI (OR: 6.24, CI: 1.51-25.84, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Mucopurulence at the time of surgery significantly increased the risk of POI, whereas concurrent ESS, performed most commonly to address comorbid rhinosinusitis, significantly decreased the risk of POI. Awareness of risk factors for POI and appropriate surgical management of concurrent rhinosinusitis can lead to reduced infectious complications after EN-DCR.

Surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: analysis of age effect

There is limited evidence in literature determining age effect on outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) in adult patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). We aimed to analyze the outcomes of EDCR according to age in primary acquired NLDO. A retrospective study was performed on consecutive adult patients and patients were divided into two age groups; group 1 (aged to 61 years) and group 2 (aged 62 to 89 years) based on the average value. The minimum required follow-up period was 6 months. A total of 441 EDCRs performed in 342 patients were enrolled. The anatomical success rate was not significantly different between the two groups (91.8% and 88.2%, P = 0.209). However, the functional success rate was significantly lower in the group 2 (85.1% and 76.9%; P = 0.036). Functional failure was associated with old age and a history of diabetes mellitus (P  = 0.024 and P  = 0.008). In subgroup analysis of patients with anatomical success but functionally failed EDCR, group 2 had significantly more comorbid conditions such as eyelid laxity (P = 0.026). In conclusion, the comorbid conditions which increase with age may affect functional outcome, especially eyelid laxity, careful preoperative examination of the eyelid and conjunctiva should be emphasized to lacrimal surgeons before performing EDCR.

The Fibrin Glue Application Enhances Surgical Success Rate in Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy With Lacrimal Sac Preservation

The purpose of this study to compare lacrimal sac flap preserving techniques with or without fibrin glue in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. A retrospective study included 132 patients who underwent unilateral endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy between February 2011 and March 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the nonfibrin glue group (n = 66) and fibrin glue anastomosis group (n = 66). Surgical success was defined as the patients' subjective report of relief of epiphora and objective endoscopic confirmation of ostium patency confirmed by a positive functional dye test. These parameters were compared between the 2 groups. Both groups were similar, in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. The surgical success rate was significantly higher in the fibrin glue anastomosis group (95.5%) than in the nonfibrin glue group (84.8%; P = .041). Complication rate was 6.1% in the nonfibrin glue group, whereas in the fibrin glue anastomosis group, it was 4.5%. The complication rate was similar in both groups (P = .99). Creation of an anastomosis between the lacrimal sac flaps and the nasal mucosa using fibrin glue improves the outcome of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Dacryocystorhinostomy: Evolution of endoscopic techniques after 498 cases

Introduction:

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy is a well-known surgical practice used to treat nasolacrimal duct obstruction and widely considered as a valid alternative to external approaches.

Purpose:

We present a retrospective case series of 498 endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomies on 401 patients, from July 2004 to May 2018, at the Department of Otolaryngology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Methods:

Of the 498 procedures, 426 were unilateral and 72 were bilateral dacryocystorhinostomy. All patients underwent routine preoperative workup including fluorescein test (Jones test 1–2), probing and irrigation of the lacrimal way, nasal endoscopy, and maxilla-facial computed tomography scan. Surgical technique was based on nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy followed by positioning of a Catalano’s silicone stent, which was left in place for about 3 months. Anatomical success was defined as a patent ostium on irrigation, whereas functional success was defined as free lacrimal flow on functional test and resolution of epiphora.

Results:

Anatomic success was achieved in 91.54% cases in primary dacryocystorhinostomy and in 89.36% after revision, whereas functional success was obtained in 90.4% in primary and 85.1% in secondary dacryocystorhinostomies. After a second revision of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, anatomical success was achieved in 90.1% and functional success in 88.7% of procedures.

Conclusion:

Our results confirm that endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy can be considered as a valid surgical approach to primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction and revision cases. The key aspects in achieving functional and anatomical results are meticulous surgical procedure and precise follow-up.

Effects of ostium granulomas and intralesional steroid injections on the surgical outcome in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of granuloma formation in the ostium and intralesional steroid injections (ISIs) on the surgical outcome after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO).

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-three cases involving 142 patients were enrolled. The ostium granulomas were classified according to their location relative to the internal common opening (superior, anterior, and posterior positions) and to the vicinity of the ostium (inner, edge, and extra types). If an ostium granuloma was observed during the follow-up and its size increased, ISIs were performed using 0.3 ml of 40 mg/ml triamcinolone acetonide. The surgical outcomes were compared between cases with and without ostium granulomas and also between each granuloma position and type.

RESULTS

Ostium granulomas occurred in 71 (38.8%) of the 183 cases, and an ISI was applied in 65 cases with a mean of 2.1 injections. All of the granulomas regressed successfully after ISIs, with the success rate not differing between the cases with (85.9%) and without (83.9%) granuloma. There was no association between granuloma location and surgical outcome. However, the functional outcome was worse (60%) for inner granulomas (which are located within the ostial base) than for extra (87.8%) and edge (98%) granulomas.

CONCLUSIONS

ISIs can be easily applied by a surgeon to help regress an ostium granuloma and improve the ostial patency after DCR. Inner ostium granulomas are associated with a worse functional outcome, and the initiation of an early corrective intervention such as an ISI should be considered.

Endoscopic-Powered Dacryocystorhinostomy Without Stenting: Long-term Outcomes of 120 Procedures

Background The necessity of silicone stenting in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) procedures is a controversial subject in the literature. Objective The purpose of the present study is to assess the long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of endoscopic-powered DCR (EP-DCR) without stenting or mucosal flaps. Methods One hundred twenty EP-DCR procedures were performed in 107 patients. Anatomical success was defined as a patent ostium on irrigation and functional success as free flow of dye from the ostium and resolution of epiphora. Results The mean follow-up was 46.5 months (range: 24-87). Of the 120 procedures, 13 were bilateral and 94 were unilateral. Anatomical and functional success rates of 92.5% were obtained. Conclusion EP-DCR without stenting is a safe and economic technique that provides satisfactory long-term results and could be considered as the treatment of choice for patients with postsaccal nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Factors associated with rhinostomy shape after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the factors associated with rhinostomy shape after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and two cases in 70 patients were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

All cases were classified into three groups according to the healed appearance of the rhinostomy: flat, ladle and ice scoop type. The flat shape was characterised by an opening with a flat surrounding and no clear border between the lacrimal sac and the nasal mucosa. The ladle shape had a depressed base without markings of a lacrimal sac. The ice scoop shape had a depressed base with a clear border between the lacrimal sac and the nasal mucosa. Anatomic success was defined as patency with syringing and endoscopic evidence of ostial patency. Functional success was defined as visualisation of fluorescein dye at the ostium and relief from epiphora. Clinical information and intra- and postoperative endoscopic video findings were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

Of the 102 cases, 19 flat, 37 ladle and 46 ice scoop type rhinostomies were observed during the follow-up examinations. Among the variables studied, patient demographics and rhinostomy size and location did not differ between the three groups. However, intraoperative lacrimal sac findings (sac size, wall thickness and mobility), postoperative ostial shrinkage and rhinostomy movement were associated with postoperative rhinostomy shape (all P < 0.05). With regard to surgical outcomes, there were no differences in anatomical patency between the three groups. However, the flat group had a worse functional success rate (73.7%) than the ladle (91.9%) and ice scoop (97.8%) groups (P = 0.008). A higher degree of ostial shrinkage and poor rhinostomy movement was observed with the flat shape appearance, which had a small, thick and poorly mobile lacrimal sac.

CONCLUSIONS

Lacrimal sac characteristics play a prominent role in determining rhinostomy shape after endoscopic DCR. The rhinostomy shape, along with the degree of ostial shrinkage and rhinostomy movement, is predictive of functional success after endoscopic DCR.

Anatomical and subjective success rates of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy over a seven-year period

PurposeEndonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (END-DCR) is a relatively novel approach that has recently been shown in some studies to provide similar success rates to the more traditional external approach for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). However, a range of success rates using this approach are reported within the literature and the majority of oculoplastic surgeons are still favouring the external approach. The purpose of this study was to review the anatomical and subjective success rates of END-DCRs performed over a 7-year period.Patients and methodsWe provide a review of the success rates of 288 END-DCRs for the treatment of acquired NLDO performed over a 7-year period by a single oculoplastic surgeon in Sydney, Australia. We describe the operative technique used and define anatomical success as demonstrated patency of the nasolacrimal drainage system at 10 weeks postoperatively while subjective success is defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of symptoms as reported by patients at the same time point.ResultsIn our study, we were able to demonstrate that out of 288 END-DCRs, an average anatomical success rate of 89.6% and an average subjective success rate of 81.3% were achievable.ConclusionsWe conclude that the success rates using our endonasal approach remain similar to those obtained using the external approach, as reported within the literature, and may be considered as a primary treatment option for acquired NLDO.

Long-term outcomes of powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in acute dacryocystitis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is rapidly gaining recognition as a primary modality of management in acute dacryocystitis and lacrimal abscess. The purpose of the present study is to report long-term outcomes of powered endoscopic DCR in cases of acute dacryocystitis.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective interventional case series.

METHODS

Twenty-one powered endoscopic DCRs were performed in 21 patients presenting with acute dacryocystitis. All cases were operated by a single surgeon (m.j.a.) using earlier published techniques. All lacrimal systems were intubated for 6 weeks. A minimum follow-up of 1 year after stent removal was considered for final analysis. Main outcome measures were the anatomical and functional success of the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients at presentation was 31.8 years. A total of 14.3% (3/21) were pediatric patients with known history of persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO), and 9.5% (2/21) had a history of external DCR in the past. All patients received postoperative antibiotics. Additional procedures included distal canalicular trephination, septoplasty, and middle turbinoplasty in one patient each. All cases showed resolution of pain and swelling at 1 week follow-up. At the mean follow-up of 15.4 months, anatomical success was achieved in 85.7% of the patients (18/21), and functional success was achieved in 80.9% (17/21).

CONCLUSION

Powered endoscopic DCR is a useful modality in the management acute dacryocystitis, with good outcomes that are maintained over a long duration of time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 126:551-553, 2016.

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy as treatment for lower lacrimal pathway obstructions in adults: Review article

Obstruction of the lacrimal pathway is manifested by epiphora, infection, and blurred vision as well as ocular and facial pain. Conservative treatments only achieve temporary relief of symptoms, thus surgery is the treatment of choice. Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is recognized as the most suitable treatment for patients with obstructions of the lacrimal system at the level of the sac or in the nasolacrimal duct. The aim of this operation is to create a bypass between the lacrimal sac and the nasal cavity. During the past 2 decades, advances in rigid endoscopic equipment and other instruments have made it possible to obtain more information about the anatomic landmarks of the nasolacrimal system, which led to the development of less-invasive and safer endoscopic techniques. However, many parts of the treatment process related to endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) still remain controversial. This article reviews the published literature about the technical issues associated with the success of EN-DCR, and clarifies the pros and cons of different pre- and postoperative procedures in adults with lower lacrimal pathway obstructions.

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone, polypropylene, and T-tube stents; randomized controlled trial of efficacy and safety

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) with different stent materials for lacrimal sac intubation in primary nasolacrimal ductal obstructions.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled study with three parallel groups. Level of evidence is 1b.

METHODS

A total of 91 patients (five bilateral) with primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) at a tertiary referral center scheduled for En-DCR were to allocated into three stent groups with a sealed envelope and were randomized into three treatments: silicone, Prolene (polypropylene), and otologic T-tube. Ophthalmology and otolaryngology clinics evaluated the patients preoperatively and postoperatively with endoscopes, lacrimal system syringing, and dacryocystography. The success of the stents was evaluated 12 months after surgery with symptom relief and ostial patency. Complications were also noted.

RESULTS

The overall success rate of the En-DCR in the stent groups was 78.1% (75/96); specifically, 87.5% (28/32) with silicone, 84.4% (27/32) with Prolene, and 62.5% (20/32) with T-tube. The efficacy of the procedures with the T-tube was significantly lower than that of the Prolene and silicone (p = .031, χ(2) test). There were no significant differences between the silicone and Prolene (p = .718, χ(2) test). Prolene was found to be related with orbital complications. Spontaneous loss is a particular complication of otologic T-tube and highly portends to failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study suggest that efficacy, defined as anatomic and functional success, is equally high for silicone and Prolene stents and lower for otologic T-tube in En-DCR.

Lacrimal outflow mechanisms and the role of scintigraphy: current trends

Lacrimal outflow can be compromised by anatomical obstructions or stenoses (nonfunctional epiphora) or by defective lacrimal “pump” function (functional epiphora). Although classic imaging modalities, such as X-ray dacryocystography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging can effectively evaluate the former, their success is much less in the evaluation of the latter. This is largely due to the fact that forced diagnostic injection of fluid into the canalicular system can overcome partial obstruction sites. On the other hand, lacrimal scintigraphy mimicks “physiological” lacrimal outflow, being performed under pressure gradients present in everyday life. This is why it is considered more suitable for the study of functional epiphora. Furthermore, quantitative lacrimal scintigraphy (with time-activity curves) enables the accurate measurement of lacrimal clearance from the conjunctival fornices and may be used to study the physiology of the lacrimal “pump.” Data obtained from the scintigraphic study of lacrimal outflow may be used to design more effective procedures in the management of functional and nonfunctional epiphora. This is a review article, based on a literature search with emphasis on recent publications and on those supporting interdisciplinary cooperation between ophthalmology and nuclear medicine.

Endonasal nasolacrimal duct surgery: a comparative study of two techniques

Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is performed in patients with saccal or postsaccal lacrimal duct obstruction. Focusing on the endonasal approach, we compared success rates, clinical outcome, complications and patient satisfaction of endoscopic vs. non-endoscopic techniques in endonasal DCR. We analyzed the results of 173 patients who underwent an endonasal DCR either utilizing a non-endoscopic (Group I) or an endoscopic technique (Group II) between 2006 and 2011. Irrigation tests followed the first day and at least 3 months after surgery. Postoperative patients' satisfaction and the occurrence of symptoms were documented and evaluated in a follow-up questionnaire. The minor complication rates of both endonasal DCR techniques were similarly low (10%) without severe adverse events. The use of the endoscope prolonged the operating time significantly (28 ± 9 min Group I vs. 34 ± 14 min Group II, p = 0.003). The success rate was 90.2% in Group II compared to only 57.9% in Group I (p < 0.000). Further, we determined the absence of reflux during the irrigation test 1 day after surgery as a significant predictor for the later outcome (R = 1.598, p = 0.005). The follow-up questionnaire revealed a significant improvement in subjectively perceived symptoms by the surgical intervention for both endonasal techniques (p < 0.000). The endoscopically assisted DCR is a safe and successful endonasal technique for patients with saccal or postsaccal lacrimal duct obstructions. The use of the endoscope led to significant higher success rates compared to non-endoscopic techniques in our collective.

Patient satisfaction following endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a quality of life study

PURPOSE

To assess the subjective success and quality of life of adult patients post endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EE-DCR) for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

DESIGN

Retrospective, questionnaire study performed at least 6 months post EE-DCR.

PARTICIPANTS

Hundred and ten of the 282 consecutive patients who underwent EE-DCR.

METHODS

A standardised questionnaire (Glasgow Benefit Inventory, GBI) was used to analyse the quality of life. The questionnaire examines four parameters, providing total, subscale, social, and physical scores.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We aimed to assess patient experience following EE-DCR surgery. Total GBI scores range from -100 to +100, the former reflecting maximal negative benefit and corresponding to subjective worsening of tearing and impact on quality of life. Any positive score reflects a satisfactory surgical outcome and +100 represents maximal positive benefit. A score of zero is no perceived benefit.

RESULTS

The average age was 62 years, 63% were female. In three of the parameters measured, there was a subjective improvement post surgery: subscale score 22.16 (95% CI: 15.23-29.09), total score 15.04 (95% CI: 9.74-20.35), and social support score 4.67 (95% CI: 0.93-8.42). Physical health scored -4.47 (95% CI: -10.25 to 1.32). Secondary analyses demonstrate no statistical significance with respect to outcome whether a trainee or consultant performed the procedure. Younger patients (under split median of 63.5) had a better total score 19.04 (95% CI: 11.35-27.74) than those older than 63.5 years (11.04, 95% CI: 3.61-18.47).

DISCUSSION

This study shows that EE-DCR gave patients improvement in quality of life, proven by a validated questionnaire. The mean total score of 15.04 found in our study compares with the 18.7 recorded by Feretis et al in 2009. Results were irrespective of the grade of surgeon, similar to the findings of Fayers et al for functional successes.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of EE-DCR for the improvement of quality of life in adult patients.

Factors associated with outcome of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy

PURPOSE

To identify factors associated with outcome of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-four cases of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in 111 patients performed for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction by a single surgeon between March 12, 2002 and November 10, 2008 were included in a retrospective, noncomparative case series. Variables assessed during the surgery included intranasal view, difficulty of bone removal, size of the lacrimal sac, presence of lacrimal sac stones, orbital fat prolapse and degree of bleeding. Successful outcome was defined as patency to lacrimal irrigation at final follow up.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one of the 134 cases (90%) were patent to irrigation at final follow up (mean 8.8 ± 8.6 months). A small lacrimal sac opening intraoperatively was associated with higher risk of failure (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 5.7 [1.6, 20] [p = 0.0072]). Orbital fat prolapse had a trend toward higher risk of failure that approached statistical significance (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 5.3 [0.87, 32] [p = 0.0698]). A narrow intranasal view, difficult bony opening, lacrimal sac stones, and bleeding were not associated with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A small lacrimal sac opening intraoperatively was associated with failure of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Chronic inflammation: a poor prognostic factor for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) success can be affected by many factors. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of chronic inflammation on the surgical outcome of En-DCR. A series of 25 primary En-DCR cases and their lacrimal sac specimens were involved in the study. The surgical outcomes were assessed subjectively (satisfied and unsatisfied) and objectively (successful and unsuccessful). All the specimens were examined for the chronic inflammation related histopathological features (inflammatory cell infiltration, fibrosis and capillary proliferation) and graded according to their severity. Moreover, a "chronic inflammation score" was established to determine the intensity of chronic inflammation using the grade of histopathological features. A quantitative and statistical analysis of histopathological features and chronic inflammation were performed between patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory outcome; and patients with successful and unsuccessful outcome. The overall success rate according to subjective and objective assessment was 60%. However, 9 of 10 patients with unsatisfactory and/or unsuccessful outcome (90%) had severe chronic inflammation of lacrimal sac. In subjective assessment, inflammatory cell infiltration (p = 0.050), fibrosis (p = 0.037), capillary proliferation (p = 0.007) and chronic inflammation (p = 0.003) had a statistically significant difference between patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory outcome. In objective assessment, statistically significant differences were detected between patients with successful and unsuccessful outcome when they compared according to inflammatory cell infiltration (p = 0.027), capillary proliferation (p = 0.007) and chronic inflammation (p = 0.003). Chronic inflammation related histopathological features of variable degree may have a role on En-DCR outcome. Chronic inflammatory score can be used as an indicator of En-DCR success.

Effects of Merogel coverage on wound healing and ostial patency in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for primary chronic dacryocystitis

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of Merogel coverage on ostial patency in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EES-DCR) for primary chronic dacryocystitis (PCD).

METHODS

In all, 260 patients with unilateral PCD were randomized into two groups: the Merogel group and the control group. All patients underwent EES-DCR. The Merogel group received Merogel covering the wound 1-2 mm around the ostium and the control group received no treatment. Patients were followed up for 9 months. The mucosal epithelialization of the wound, the proliferation of fibrosis tissue, and the success rate of ostial patency were compared.

RESULTS

Our study included 112 patients in the Merogel group and 115 patients in the control group. At the 2-week review, intact mucosal epithelium lined the ostia in 96 Merogel patients compared with 80 control patients (ITT analysis: χ(2)=4.502, P=0.034). At the 9-month review, scars were present in 18 patients in the Merogel group compared with 39 patients in the control group (ITT analysis: χ(2)=9.909, P=0.002, ITT analysis). No differences were observed in the granulation formation between the two groups. The success rate of ostial patency reached 94.6% (106/112) in the Merogel group compared with 80% (92/115) in the control group (ITT analysis: χ(2)=4.151, P=0.042).

CONCLUSION

Merogel coverage may enhance the success rate of EES-DCR for PCD by promoting mucosal epithelial healing and preventing excessive scarring.

Watery eye following patent external DCR: an MR dacryocystography study

PURPOSE

To examine patients with persistent watery epiphora following patent external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with magnetic resonance imaging dacryocystography (MR-DCG).

METHODS

Patients with unobstructed nasolacrimal irrigation following external DCR were included. Five patients with watery epiphora constituted the study group (SG). Five patients without epiphora constituted the control group (CG). All patients underwent MR-DCG following the instillation of artificial tears in the conjunctival fornix. The osteotomy site was identified in T1-weighted coronal images. Lacrimal flow was assessed with modified T2-weighted (True Fast Imaging Steady State Pulse, "TrueFISP") coronal images before and 10 min after repeated blinking. Signal intensities at three regions of interest (ROIs), corresponding to the eyeball (ROI-1), conjunctival sac (ROI-2), and anastomotic site (ROI-3) were measured.

RESULTS

Differences in the diameter of both osseous and soft tissue ostia between SG and CG were statistically not significant. A post-blink increase in signal intensity at ROI-3 was noted in both groups, whereas differences in signal intensity for ROI-1 and ROI-2 were statistically not significant. The post-blink signal intensity increase in ROI-3 was significantly more pronounced in the CG, compared with the SG.

CONCLUSIONS

The fact that signal intensity increase at ROI-3 was less pronounced in the SG, compared with CG, implies a compromised "lacrimal pump" mechanism in the former group. The methodology presented may be used for the evaluation of post-DCR epiphora.