1
|
Wald T, Koppe TJ, Pirlich M, Zebralla V, Kunz V, Dietz A, Stoehr M, Wichmann G. Outcome Disparities in Patients with Early-Stage Laryngeal Cancer Depending on Localization, Tobacco Consumption, and Treatment Modality. Biomedicines 2024; 12:2136. [PMID: 39335649 PMCID: PMC11428932 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12092136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2024] [Revised: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is among most frequent malignancies of the head and neck. Recent oncologic research focusses on advanced rather than on early stages. Thus, we aimed to improve the knowledge concerning prognostic factors and survival in early glottic (GC) and supraglottic cancer (SGC). Methods: We retrospectively investigated patients diagnosed in 2007 to 2020 with stage I or II GC (ICD-10-C32.0) or SGC (ICD-10-C32.1, C32.8 or C32.9). For precise discrimination of GC and SGC, pathology reports about biopsy and definitive excision were closely examined and information on clinical characteristics and risk factors were collected before analyzing patterns of risk factors for overall survival (OS) in multivariate Cox regression analyses (mvCox). Results: The cohort included 220 patients with early GC (n = 183) and SGC (n = 37). The GC patients showed significantly improved 5-year OS compared to SGC patients (83.6% vs. 64.9%; p = 0.004), whereas survival according to UICC stage (I vs. II) was not different (p = 0.177). Surgical resection was superior to definitive radiotherapy (RT) for 5-year OS (p < 0.001). Cumulative tobacco consumption of greater than 10 pack years drastically impaired OS (p = 0.024), especially in patients receiving RT (p < 0.001). Supraglottic localization, smoking, and re-resection after initial R1 status consistently were independent prognostic factors in mvCox. Conclusions: Our cohort of early LSCC patients demonstrates significant negative impact of supraglottic localization, older age, tobacco consumption, poor tumor differentiation, and re-resection on OS. Further research is required as there is still lack of evidence on optimal decision-making and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Wald
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (T.-J.K.); (M.P.); (V.Z.); (V.K.); (A.D.); (M.S.); (G.W.)
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tim-Jonathan Koppe
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (T.-J.K.); (M.P.); (V.Z.); (V.K.); (A.D.); (M.S.); (G.W.)
| | - Markus Pirlich
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (T.-J.K.); (M.P.); (V.Z.); (V.K.); (A.D.); (M.S.); (G.W.)
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Veit Zebralla
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (T.-J.K.); (M.P.); (V.Z.); (V.K.); (A.D.); (M.S.); (G.W.)
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Viktor Kunz
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (T.-J.K.); (M.P.); (V.Z.); (V.K.); (A.D.); (M.S.); (G.W.)
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Dietz
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (T.-J.K.); (M.P.); (V.Z.); (V.K.); (A.D.); (M.S.); (G.W.)
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matthaeus Stoehr
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (T.-J.K.); (M.P.); (V.Z.); (V.K.); (A.D.); (M.S.); (G.W.)
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Gunnar Wichmann
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (T.-J.K.); (M.P.); (V.Z.); (V.K.); (A.D.); (M.S.); (G.W.)
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 10–14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Talbot R, Higham R, Croft J, Ainsworth G, Brown S, Kelly R, Stocken D, Thomson S, Rousseau N. Rapid qualitative analysis of recruitment obstacles in the FORVAD (Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy surgery versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy surgery in the treatment of cervical brachialgia) randomised, controlled trial. Trials 2024; 25:546. [PMID: 39152476 PMCID: PMC11330054 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08391-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of surgical trials is increasing but such trials can be complex to deliver and pose specific challenges. A multi-centre, Phase III, RCT comparing Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Cervical Brachialgia (FORVAD Trial) was unable to recruit to target. A rapid qualitative study was conducted during trial closedown to understand the experiences of healthcare professionals who participated in the FORVAD Trial, with the aim of informing future research in this area. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 healthcare professionals who had participated in the FORVAD Trial. Interviews explored participants' experiences of the FORVAD trial. A rapid qualitative analysis was conducted, informed by Normalisation Process Theory. RESULTS Four main themes were generated in the data analysis: (1) individual vs. community equipoise; (2) trial set-up and delivery; (3) identifying and approaching patients; and (4) timing of randomisation. The objectives of the FORVAD trial made sense to participants and they supported the idea that there was clinical or collective equipoise regarding the two FORVAD interventions; however, many surgeons had treatment preferences and lacked individual equipoise. The site which had most recruitment success had adopted a more structured process for identification and recruitment of patients, whereas other sites that adopted more "ad hoc" screening strategies struggled to identify patients. Randomisation on the day of surgery caused both medico-legal and practical concerns at some sites. CONCLUSIONS Organisation and implementation of a surgical trial in neurosurgery is complex and presents many challenges. Sites often reported low recruitment and discussed the logistical issues of conducting a complex surgical RCT. Future trials in neurosurgery may need to offer more flexibility and time during set-up to maximise opportunities for larger recruitment numbers. Rapid qualitative analysis informed by Normalisation Process Theory was able to quickly identify key issues with trial implementation so rapid qualitative analysis may be a useful approach for teams conducting qualitative research in trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN reference: 10,133,661. Registered 23rd November 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Talbot
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ruchi Higham
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Julie Croft
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Gemma Ainsworth
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachel Kelly
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Deborah Stocken
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Simon Thomson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beard DJ, Davies L, Cook JA, Stokes J, Leal J, Fletcher H, Abram S, Chegwin K, Greshon A, Jackson W, Bottomley N, Dodd M, Bourke H, Shirkey BA, Paez A, Lamb SE, Barker KL, Phillips M, Brown M, Lythe V, Mirza B, Carr A, Monk P, Areia CM, O'Leary S, Haddad F, Wilson C, Price A. Comparison of surgical or non-surgical management for non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury: the ACL SNNAP RCT. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-97. [PMID: 38940695 PMCID: PMC11228690 DOI: 10.3310/vdkb6009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee is common and leads to decreased activity and risk of secondary osteoarthritis of the knee. Management of patients with a non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury can be non-surgical (rehabilitation) or surgical (reconstruction). However, insufficient evidence exists to guide treatment. Objective(s) To determine in patients with non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury and symptoms of instability whether a strategy of surgical management (reconstruction) without prior rehabilitation was more clinically and cost-effective than non-surgical management (rehabilitation). Design A pragmatic, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial with two-arm parallel groups and 1:1 allocation. Due to the nature of the interventions, no blinding could be carried out. Setting Twenty-nine NHS orthopaedic units in the United Kingdom. Participants Participants with a symptomatic (instability) non-acute anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Interventions Patients in the surgical management arm underwent surgical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as soon as possible and without any further rehabilitation. Patients in the rehabilitation arm attended physiotherapy sessions and only were listed for reconstructive surgery on continued instability following rehabilitation. Surgery following initial rehabilitation was an expected outcome for many patients and within protocol. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 4 at 18 months post randomisation. Secondary outcomes included return to sport/activity, intervention-related complications, patient satisfaction, expectations of activity, generic health quality of life, knee-specific quality of life and resource usage. Results Three hundred and sixteen participants were recruited between February 2017 and April 2020 with 156 randomised to surgical management and 160 to rehabilitation. Forty-one per cent (n = 65) of those allocated to rehabilitation underwent subsequent reconstruction within 18 months with 38% (n = 61) completing rehabilitation and not undergoing surgery. Seventy-two per cent (n = 113) of those allocated to surgery underwent reconstruction within 18 months. Follow-up at the primary outcome time point was 78% (n = 248; surgical, n = 128; rehabilitation, n = 120). Both groups improved over time. Adjusted mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 4 scores at 18 months had increased to 73.0 in the surgical arm and to 64.6 in the rehabilitation arm. The adjusted mean difference was 7.9 (95% confidence interval 2.5 to 13.2; p = 0.005) in favour of surgical management. The per-protocol analyses supported the intention-to-treat results, with all treatment effects favouring surgical management at a level reaching statistical significance. There was a significant difference in Tegner Activity Score at 18 months. Sixty-eight per cent (n = 65) of surgery patients did not reach their expected activity level compared to 73% (n = 63) in the rehabilitation arm. There were no differences between groups in surgical complications (n = 1 surgery, n = 2 rehab) or clinical events (n = 11 surgery, n = 12 rehab). Of surgery patients, 82.9% were satisfied compared to 68.1% of rehabilitation patients. Health economic analysis found that surgical management led to improved health-related quality of life compared to non-surgical management (0.052 quality-adjusted life-years, p = 0.177), but with higher NHS healthcare costs (£1107, p < 0.001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the surgical management programme versus rehabilitation was £19,346 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Using £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year thresholds, surgical management is cost-effective in the UK setting with a probability of being the most cost-effective option at 51% and 72%, respectively. Limitations Not all surgical patients underwent reconstruction, but this did not affect trial interpretation. The adherence to physiotherapy was patchy, but the trial was designed as pragmatic. Conclusions Surgical management (reconstruction) for non-acute anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients was superior to non-surgical management (rehabilitation). Although physiotherapy can still provide benefit, later-presenting non-acute anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients benefit more from surgical reconstruction without delaying for a prior period of rehabilitation. Future work Confirmatory studies and those to explore the influence of fidelity and compliance will be useful. Trial registration This trial is registered as Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10110685; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02980367. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/140/63) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 27. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Loretta Davies
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan A Cook
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Jamie Stokes
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Jose Leal
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Heidi Fletcher
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon Abram
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Katie Chegwin
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Akiko Greshon
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - William Jackson
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicholas Bottomley
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew Dodd
- Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Henry Bourke
- Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Slough, UK
| | - Beverly A Shirkey
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Arsenio Paez
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Karen L Barker
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Vanessa Lythe
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Burhan Mirza
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Carr
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Monk
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Carlos Morgado Areia
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Sean O'Leary
- Royal Berkshire Hospital, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
| | - Fares Haddad
- University College Hospitals, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Wilson
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Andrew Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tang S, Akers C, Alnajjar H, Ayres B, Baldini C, Embleton-Thirsk A, Gurusamy K, Hadway P, Kumar V, Lau M, Nigam R, Pang K, Parnham A, Pizzo E, Ranieri V, Rees R, Sangar V, Wadke A, Williams N, Muneer A. A study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial investigating videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer (VELRAD). Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:61. [PMID: 38600541 PMCID: PMC11005199 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01474-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penile cancer is a rare male genital malignancy. Surgical excision of the primary tumour is followed by radical inguinal lymphadenectomy if there is metastatic disease detected by biopsy, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or following sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with impalpable disease. However, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy is associated with a high morbidity rate, and there is increasing usage of a videoendoscopic approach as an alternative. METHODS A pragmatic, UK-wide multicentre feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), comparing videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. Patients will be identified and recruited from supraregional multi-disciplinary team meetings (sMDT) and must be aged 18 or over requiring inguinal lymphadenectomy, with no contraindications to surgical intervention for their cancer. Participants will be followed up for 6 months following randomisation. The primary outcome is the ability to recruit patients for randomisation across all selected sites and the rate of loss to follow-up. Other outcomes include acceptability of the trial and intervention to patients and healthcare professionals assessed by qualitative research and obtaining resource utilisation information for health economic analysis. DISCUSSION There are currently no other published RCTs comparing videoendoscopic versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. Ongoing study is required to determine whether randomising patients to either procedure is feasible and acceptable to patients. The results of this study may determine the design of a subsequent trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov PRS registry, registration number NCT05592639. Date of registration: 13th October 2022, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley Tang
- University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Akers
- University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Ben Ayres
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Paul Hadway
- Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
| | - Vivekanandan Kumar
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Maurice Lau
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Raj Nigam
- Royal Surrey County Hospital, Surrey, UK
| | - Karl Pang
- University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Arie Parnham
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Rowland Rees
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Vijay Sangar
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Asif Muneer
- University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ninomiya MM, Hiemstra J, Nicholson E, Isaac KV. Methods of Recruitment for Surgical and Perioperative Randomized Controlled Trials: A Rapid Review. World J Surg 2023; 47:2659-2667. [PMID: 37589794 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07124-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Due to the complex nature of surgical randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reaching target recruitment can be challenging. The primary objective was to report on characteristics of successful pilot surgical and perioperative RCTs and the methodological strategies implemented to optimize recruitment. The secondary objective was to provide recommendations for successful recruitment strategies for future surgical RCTs. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Web of Science (via Ovid) databases were searched from 2012 to 2022. This review included surgical and perioperative pilot studies that met their recruitment targets. Study and recruitment characteristics were summarized, and potential relationships between study design and recruitment rate were assessed. Optimized recruitment strategies were extracted when reported. Of 4156 total articles identified, 255 underwent full-text screening, and 52 articles were included. Of the included pilot studies, 21% (n = 11) did not indicate a target sample size or recruitment rate. Recruitment methods were minimally reported in pilot studies for perioperative or surgical RCTs. Strategies to optimize recruitment included internal iterative evaluations of the recorded recruitment appointments and staged introduction of the study. Recruitment rate was not associated with invasiveness of intervention or burden of participation. Patient involvement is absent from current reports on methodological design and offers valuable opportunity to optimize recruitment. Recruitment strategies in perioperative and surgical RCTs can be optimized with iterative qualitative evaluation of the recruitment methods with input from the interdisciplinary research team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Morton Ninomiya
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Jenna Hiemstra
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Emma Nicholson
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, 2221 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Kathryn V Isaac
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, 2221 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thomson S, Ainsworth G, Selvanathan S, Kelly R, Collier H, Mujica-Mota R, Talbot R, Brown ST, Croft J, Rousseau N, Higham R, Al-Tamimi Y, Buxton N, Carleton-Bland N, Gledhill M, Halstead V, Hutchinson P, Meacock J, Mukerji N, Pal D, Vargas-Palacios A, Prasad A, Wilby M, Stocken D. Posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy for Cervical Brachialgia: the FORVAD RCT. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-228. [PMID: 37929307 PMCID: PMC10641711 DOI: 10.3310/otoh7720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Posterior cervical foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy are routinely used operations to treat cervical brachialgia, although definitive evidence supporting superiority of either is lacking. Objective The primary objective was to investigate whether or not posterior cervical foraminotomy is superior to anterior cervical discectomy in improving clinical outcome. Design This was a Phase III, unblinded, prospective, United Kingdom multicentre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled superiority trial comparing posterior cervical foraminotomy with anterior cervical discectomy. A rapid qualitative study was conducted during the close-down phase, involving remote semistructured interviews with trial participants and health-care professionals. Setting National Health Service trusts. Participants Patients with symptomatic unilateral cervical brachialgia for at least 6 weeks. Interventions Participants were randomised to receive posterior cervical foraminotomy or anterior cervical discectomy. Allocation was not blinded to participants, medical staff or trial staff. Health-care use from providing the initial surgical intervention to hospital discharge was measured and valued using national cost data. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was clinical outcome, as measured by patient-reported Neck Disability Index score 52 weeks post operation. Secondary outcome measures included complications, reoperations and restricted American Spinal Injury Association score over 6 weeks post operation, and patient-reported Eating Assessment Tool-10 items, Glasgow-Edinburgh Throat Scale, Voice Handicap Index-10 items, PainDETECT and Numerical Rating Scales for neck and upper-limb pain over 52 weeks post operation. Results The target recruitment was 252 participants. Owing to slow accrual, the trial closed after randomising 23 participants from 11 hospitals. The qualitative substudy found that there was support and enthusiasm for the posterior cervical FORaminotomy Versus Anterior cervical Discectomy in the treatment of cervical brachialgia trial and randomised clinical trials in this area. However, clinical equipoise appears to have been an issue for sites and individual surgeons. Randomisation on the day of surgery and processes for screening and approaching participants were also crucial factors in some centres. The median Neck Disability Index scores at baseline (pre surgery) and at 52 weeks was 44.0 (interquartile range 36.0-62.0 weeks) and 25.3 weeks (interquartile range 20.0-42.0 weeks), respectively, in the posterior cervical foraminotomy group (n = 14), and 35.6 weeks (interquartile range 34.0-44.0 weeks) and 45.0 weeks (interquartile range 20.0-57.0 weeks), respectively, in the anterior cervical discectomy group (n = 9). Scores appeared to reduce (i.e. improve) in the posterior cervical foraminotomy group, but not in the anterior cervical discectomy group. The median Eating Assessment Tool-10 items score for swallowing was higher (worse) after anterior cervical discectomy (13.5) than after posterior cervical foraminotomy (0) on day 1, but not at other time points, whereas the median Glasgow-Edinburgh Throat Scale score for globus was higher (worse) after anterior cervical discectomy (15, 7, 6, 6, 2, 2.5) than after posterior cervical foraminotomy (3, 0, 0, 0.5, 0, 0) at all postoperative time points. Five postoperative complications occurred within 6 weeks of surgery, all after anterior cervical discectomy. Neck pain was more severe on day 1 following posterior cervical foraminotomy (Numerical Rating Scale - Neck Pain score 8.5) than at the same time point after anterior cervical discectomy (Numerical Rating Scale - Neck Pain score 7.0). The median health-care costs of providing initial surgical intervention were £2610 for posterior cervical foraminotomy and £4411 for anterior cervical discectomy. Conclusions The data suggest that posterior cervical foraminotomy is associated with better outcomes, fewer complications and lower costs, but the trial recruited slowly and closed early. Consequently, the trial is underpowered and definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. Recruitment was impaired by lack of individual equipoise and by concern about randomising on the day of surgery. A large prospective multicentre trial comparing anterior cervical discectomy and posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical brachialgia is still required. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN10133661. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 21. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Thomson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Gemma Ainsworth
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Rachel Kelly
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Howard Collier
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Talbot
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Tess Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Julie Croft
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ruchi Higham
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Yahia Al-Tamimi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Neil Buxton
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Martin Gledhill
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Peter Hutchinson
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - James Meacock
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nitin Mukerji
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Debasish Pal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Anantharaju Prasad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Martin Wilby
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Deborah Stocken
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ikeda AK, Suarez-Goris D, Reich AJ, Pattisapu P, Raol NP, Randolph GW, Shin JJ. Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Part 16: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods-Contrasting and Complementary Approaches. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023. [PMID: 37668182 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
Qualitative methods have been increasingly applied in our literature, providing richness to data and incorporating the nuances of patient and family perspectives. These qualitative research techniques provide breadth and depth beyond what can be gleaned through quantitative methods alone. When both quantitative and qualitative approaches are coupled, their findings provide complementary information which can further substantiate study conclusions. We thus aim to provide insight into qualitative and quantitative methods in comparison and contrast to each other, as well as guidance on when each approach is most apt. In relation, we also describe mixed methods and the theory supporting their framework. In doing so, we provide the foundation for an ensuing, more detailed exposition of qualitative methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison K Ikeda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Dany Suarez-Goris
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Prasanth Pattisapu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University and Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Nikhila P Raol
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Gregory W Randolph
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer J Shin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tang S, Pang KH, Alnajjar HM, Ayres B, Kumar V, Parnham A, Muneer A. Videoendoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Versus Radical Open Dissection (VELRAD) in Patients with Male Genital Cancer: A Clinical Trial Update. Eur Urol Focus 2023:S2405-4569(23)00034-2. [PMID: 36797170 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
VELRAD is the first multicentre feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open dissection for male genital cancer. We have randomised nine patients so far in our attempt to identify the best approach to inguinal lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley Tang
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Karl H Pang
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hussain M Alnajjar
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ben Ayres
- St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Vivekanandan Kumar
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Arie Parnham
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Asif Muneer
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK; Department of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hamilton DW, O'Hara J, Rajgor A, Selby G, Anderson M, Keltie K, Parker R, Teare D, Patterson J, Jones TM, Sharp L. Precision medicine in laryngeal cancer: protocol of the laryngeal cancer cohort (LARCH). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067561. [PMID: 36639211 PMCID: PMC9843189 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laryngeal cancer disproportionately affects socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. Treatment can render a patient nil by mouth or in need of a permanent tracheostomy. In the past 30 years, survival has remained at best static and at worst it has declined. Currently, there is no method of prognosticating how a patient will respond to treatment.The LARyngeal Cancer coHort (LARCH) aims to establish how survival and quality-of-life outcomes compare between surgery and (chemo)radiotherapy in early and advanced laryngeal cancer and how the presenting features of laryngeal cancer influence oncological, functional and quality-of-life outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is the first enhanced laryngeal cancer disease cohort. In the initial phase, we aim to deliver a prospective cohort study of 150 patients in 8 centres over a 3-year period.Patient, tumour, quality-of-life and laryngeal functional data will be collected from patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Multiple logistic regression analyses will be used to quantify locoregional control and identify factors associated with control overall and by treatment modality and identify factors associated with quality of life overall and by treatment modality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Most interventions take place as part of routine care, with LARCH providing a mechanism for recording this data centrally. When successfully recruiting in the North of England, we plan to roll out LARCH nationwide; in the future, LARCH can be used as a trial platform in the disease. The results will be submitted for publication in high-impact international peer-reviewed journals and presented to scientific meetings. Access to the anonymised LARCH dataset by other researchers will be publicised and promoted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN27819867.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Winston Hamilton
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- ENT, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - James O'Hara
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- ENT, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Amarkumar Rajgor
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- ENT, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Mhairi Anderson
- Newcastle Joint Research Office, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kim Keltie
- Northern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rosalyn Parker
- Northern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dawn Teare
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Joanne Patterson
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Terry M Jones
- Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Paddock K, Woolfall K, Kearney A, Pattison N, Frith L, Gamble C, Welters I, Trinder J, Young B. Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066149. [PMID: 36375987 PMCID: PMC9664286 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Obtaining informed consent from patients in intensive care units (ICUs) prior to enrolment in a study is practically and ethically complex. Decisions about the participation of critically ill patients in research often involve substitute decision makers (SDMs), such as a patient's relatives or doctors. We explored the perspectives of different stakeholder groups towards these consent procedures. DESIGN AND METHODS Mixed-methods study comprising surveys completed by ICU patients, their relatives and healthcare practitioners in 14 English ICUs, followed by qualitative interviews with a subset of survey participants. Empirical bioethics informed the analysis and synthesis of the data. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics of Likert responses, and analysis of interview data was informed by thematic reflective approaches. RESULTS Analysis included 1409 survey responses (ICU patients n=333, relatives n=488, healthcare practitioners n=588) and 60 interviews (ICU patients n=13, relatives n=30, healthcare practitioners n=17). Most agreed with relatives acting as SDMs based on the perception that relatives often know the patient well enough to reflect their views. While the practice of doctors serving as SDMs was supported by most survey respondents, a quarter (25%) disagreed. Views were more positive at interview and shifted markedly depending on particularities of the study. Participants also wanted reassurance that patient care was prioritised over research recruitment. Findings lend support for adaptations to consent procedures, including collaborative decision-making to correct misunderstandings of the implications of research for that patient. This empirical evidence is used to develop good practice guidance that is to be published separately. CONCLUSIONS Participants largely supported existing consent procedures, but their perspectives on these consent procedures depended on their perceptions of what the research involved and the safeguards in place. Findings point to the importance of explaining clearly what safeguards are in place to protect the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Paddock
- Department of Childhood, Youth and Education Studies, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kerry Woolfall
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anna Kearney
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Natalie Pattison
- East and North Hertfordshire National Health Service Trust, Hertfordshire, UK
- School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Lucy Frith
- Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Carrol Gamble
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ingeborg Welters
- Department of Critical Care, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - John Trinder
- Ulster Hospital, Belfast, South Eastern Health & Social Services Trust, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Bridget Young
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Farrar N, Elliott D, Houghton C, Jepson M, Mills N, Paramasivan S, Plumb L, Wade J, Young B, Donovan JL, Rooshenas L. Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Trials 2022; 23:883. [PMID: 36266700 PMCID: PMC9585862 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06818-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recruiting patients to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often reported to be challenging, and the evidence base for effective interventions that could be used by staff (recruiters) undertaking recruitment is lacking. Although the experiences and perspectives of recruiters have been widely reported, an evidence synthesis is required in order to inform the development of future interventions. This paper aims to address this by systematically searching and synthesising the evidence on recruiters’ perspectives and experiences of recruiting patients into RCTs. Methods A qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) following Thomas and Harden’s approach to thematic synthesis was conducted. The Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ORRCA and Web of Science electronic databases were searched. Studies were sampled to ensure that the focus of the research was aligned with the phenomena of interest of the QES, their methodological relevance to the QES question, and to include variation across the clinical areas of the studies. The GRADE CERQual framework was used to assess confidence in the review findings. Results In total, 9316 studies were identified for screening, which resulted in 128 eligible papers. The application of the QES sampling strategy resulted in 30 papers being included in the final analysis. Five overlapping themes were identified which highlighted the complex manner in which recruiters experience RCT recruitment: (1) recruiting to RCTs in a clinical environment, (2) enthusiasm for the RCT, (3) making judgements about whether to approach a patient, (4) communication challenges, (5) interplay between recruiter and professional roles. Conclusions This QES identified factors which contribute to the complexities that recruiters can face in day-to-day clinical settings, and the influence recruiters and non-recruiting healthcare professionals have on opportunities afforded to patients for RCT participation. It has reinforced the importance of considering the clinical setting in its entirety when planning future RCTs and indicated the need to better normalise and support research if it is to become part of day-to-day practice. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42020141297 (registered 11/02/2020). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06818-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Farrar
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Daisy Elliott
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Áras Moyola, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Marcus Jepson
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Nicola Mills
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Sangeetha Paramasivan
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Lucy Plumb
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.,UK Kidney Association, UK Renal Registry, Bristol, UK
| | - Julia Wade
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - Jenny L Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Elfeky A, Treweek S, Hannes K, Bruhn H, Fraser C, Gillies K. Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e055521. [PMID: 35437247 PMCID: PMC9016401 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review published pretrial qualitative research studies and explore how their findings were used to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale trials. DESIGN Qualitative evidence synthesis using thematic analysis. DATA SOURCES AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We conducted a comprehensive search of databases; Dissertation Abstracts International, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Sociological Abstracts and PsycINFO. We included all reports of pretrial qualitative data on recruitment and retention in clinical trials up to March 2018. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two authors independently extracted data using a predefined data extraction form that captured study aims, design, methodological approach and main findings, including barriers and facilitators to recruitment and or retention. The synthesis was undertaken using Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis method and reported following the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research guidelines. Confidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach. RESULTS Thirty-five papers (connected to 31 feasibility studies) from three different countries, published between 2010 and 2017 were included. All studies were embedded in pilot or feasibility studies to inform design aspects in preparation for a subsequent full-scale trial. Twelve themes were identified as recruitment barriers and three as recruitment facilitators. Two themes were identified as barriers for retention and none as retention facilitators. The findings from qualitative research in feasibility or pilot trials are often not explicitly linked to proposed changes to the recruitment and retention strategies to be used in the future or planned full-scale trial. CONCLUSIONS Many trial teams do pretrial qualitative work with the aim of improving recruitment and retention in future full-scale trials. Just over half of all reports of such work do not clearly show how their findings will change the recruitment and retention strategy of the future trial. The scope of pretrial work needs to expand beyond looking for problems and also look for what might help and spend more time on retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adel Elfeky
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Karin Hannes
- Research Group SoMeTHin'K, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hanne Bruhn
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Donovan JL, Jepson M, Rooshenas L, Paramasivan S, Mills N, Elliott D, Wade J, Reda D, Blazeby JM, Moghanaki D, Hwang ES, Davies L. Development of a new adapted QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI-Two) for rapid application to RCTs underway with enrolment shortfalls—to identify previously hidden barriers and improve recruitment. Trials 2022; 23:258. [PMID: 35379301 PMCID: PMC8978173 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06187-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) struggle to recruit, despite valiant efforts. The QRI (QuinteT Recruitment Intervention) uses innovative research methods to optimise recruitment by revealing previously hidden barriers related to the perceptions and experiences of recruiters and patients, and targeting remedial actions. It was designed to be integrated with RCTs anticipating difficulties at the outset. A new version of the intervention (QRI-Two) was developed for RCTs already underway with enrolment shortfalls. Methods QRIs in 12 RCTs with enrolment shortfalls during 2007–2017 were reviewed to document which of the research methods used could be rapidly applied to successfully identify recruitment barriers. These methods were then included in the new streamlined QRI-Two intervention which was applied in 20 RCTs in the USA and Europe during 2018–2019. The feasibility of the QRI-Two was investigated, recruitment barriers and proposed remedial actions were documented, and the QRI-Two protocol was finalised. Results The review of QRIs from 2007 to 2017 showed that previously unrecognised recruitment barriers could be identified but data collection for the full QRI required time and resources usually unavailable to ongoing RCTs. The streamlined QRI-Two focussed on analysis of screening/accrual data and RCT documents (protocol, patient-information), with discussion of newly diagnosed barriers and potential remedial actions in a workshop with the RCT team. Four RCTs confirmed the feasibility of the rapid application of the QRI-Two. When the QRI-Two was applied to 14 RCTs underway with enrolment shortfalls, an array of previously unknown/underestimated recruitment barriers related to issues such as equipoise, intervention preferences, or study presentation was identified, with new insights into losses of eligible patients along the recruitment pathway. The QRI-Two workshop enabled discussion of the newly diagnosed barriers and potential remedial actions to improve recruitment in collaboration with the RCT team. As expected, the QRI-Two performed less well in six RCTs at the start-up stage before commencing enrolment. Conclusions The QRI-Two can be applied rapidly, diagnose previously unrecognised recruitment barriers, and suggest remedial actions in RCTs underway with enrolment shortfalls, providing opportunities for RCT teams to develop targeted actions to improve recruitment. The effectiveness of the QRI-Two in improving recruitment requires further evaluation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06187-y.
Collapse
|
14
|
Tans L, Al-Mamgani A, Kwa SLS, Elbers JBW, Keskin-Cambay F, Sewnaik A, Dorr M, Nout R, Heemsbergen W. Single vocal cord irradiation for early-stage glottic cancer: Excellent local control and favorable toxicity profile. Oral Oncol 2022; 127:105782. [PMID: 35276637 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To validate the earlier reported promising oncologic outcomes and favorable toxicity profile following single vocal cord irradiation (SVCI) in an expanded cohort of patients with early-stage glottic cancer treated at our institute with longer follow-up time. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between February 2011 and January 2020, 111 consecutive patients with early-stage glottic cancer were treated with SVCI to the whole involved vocal cord (58.08 Gy, given in 16 fractions of 3.63 Gy). Setup verification was done using cone-beam CT, prior to each fraction. The endpoints were local control (LC), overall survival (OS), grade ≥ 3 toxicity and voice quality assessment using voice-handicap index (VHI) questionnaires. RESULTS Median follow-up was 41 months (range; 8-84). Two patients developed in-field local failure (LF). The 3- and 5-year LC rates were 99.1% and 97.1%, respectively. As both patients with LF were successfully salvaged with total laryngectomy, the 5-year ultimate LC-rates was 99%. The 5-years OS was 80.6%. All patients finished treatment without any interruption. No patients developed acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Late grade 3 toxicity was reported in 7 patients (6.5%) out of 108 patients evaluable for late toxicity; 2 because of severe hoarseness and 5 because of laryngeal radionecrosis (4.5%). The 5-years laryngectomy-free survival was 98.1%. The VHI-scores improved over time, only 22% of patients had VHI > 30 at 3-years post-radiotherapy, compared to 38% at baseline. CONCLUSIONS Local control rate and laryngectomy-free survival of SVCI are excellent with favorable toxicity profile and good VHI-score. These results validate our early results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Tans
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Abrahim Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Stefan L S Kwa
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jos B W Elbers
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Fatma Keskin-Cambay
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Aniel Sewnaik
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maarten Dorr
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Remi Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wilma Heemsbergen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
A randomized clinical trial of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor mouthwash for oral mucositis in head and neck cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2022; 56:102093. [PMID: 35026498 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Revised: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oral mucositis (OM) is a significant problem for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). The purpose of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to evaluate the effectiveness of the granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) mouthwash compared to Salt and Soda mouthwash for both the prevention (prior to onset of OM) and treatment (beginning at the onset of OM to its healing) of radiation therapy (RT)-induced OM. METHODS A total of 91 patients with HNC were randomized to receive: GM-CSF throughout both the prevention and treatment phases (GG group); Salt and Soda throughout both phases (SS group) or Salt and Soda during the prevention phase followed by GM-CSF at the onset of OM (SG group). Three groups were compared on the occurrence and grades of OM, functional status, pain, chewing, and swallowing during and after RT. RESULTS No significant differences were found in the occurrence and grades of OM in the patients who used GM-CSF vs. Salt and Soda in the prevention phase. In addition, no differences were seen among the three groups in functional status, pain, chewing, and swallowing during and after RT. CONCLUSION Given that GM-CSF was no more effective than Salt and Soda mouthwash for the prevention or treatment of OM, the readily available and cheaper mouthwash can be used at considerable cost savings.
Collapse
|
16
|
Davies L, Beard D, Cook JA, Price A, Osbeck I, Toye F. The challenge of equipoise in trials with a surgical and non-surgical comparison: a qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnography. Trials 2021; 22:678. [PMID: 34620194 PMCID: PMC8495989 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05403-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised controlled trials in surgery can be a challenge to design and conduct, especially when including a non-surgical comparison. As few as half of initiated surgical trials reach their recruitment target, and failure to recruit is cited as the most frequent reason for premature closure of surgical RCTs. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis was to identify and synthesise findings from qualitative studies exploring the challenges in the design and conduct of trials directly comparing surgical and non-surgical interventions. METHODS A qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography was conducted. Six electronic bibliographic databases (Medline, Central, Cinahl, Embase and PsycInfo) were searched up to the end of February 2018. Studies that explored patients' and health care professionals' experiences regarding participating in RCTs with a surgical and non-surgical comparison were included. The GRADE-CERQual framework was used to assess confidence in review findings. RESULTS In total, 3697 abstracts and 49 full texts were screened and 26 published studies reporting experiences of patients and healthcare professionals were included. The focus of the studies (24/26) was primarily related to the challenge of recruitment. Two studies explored reasons for non-compliance to treatment allocation following randomisation. Five themes related to the challenges to these types of trials were identified: (1) radical choice between treatments; (2) patients' discomfort with randomisation: I want the best treatment for me as an individual; (3) challenge of equipoise: patients' a priori preferences for treatment; (4) challenge of equipoise: clinicians' a priori preferences for treatment and (5) imbalanced presentation of interventions. CONCLUSION The marked dichotomy between the surgical and non-surgical interventions was highlighted in this review as making recruitment to these types of trials particularly challenging. This review identified factors that increase our understanding of why patients and clinicians may find equipoise more challenging in these types of trials compared to other trial comparisons. Trialists may wish to consider exploring the balance of potential factors influencing patient and clinician preferences towards treatments before they start recruitment, to enable issues specific to a particular trial to be identified and addressed. This may enable trial teams to make more efficient considered design choices and benefit the delivery of such trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loretta Davies
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.
| | - David Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Jonathan A Cook
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Andrew Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| | | | - Francine Toye
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Malik A, Panda S, Sakthivel P. Treatment of early glottic carcinoma: Is it a paradox of choices? Oral Oncol 2021; 124:105516. [PMID: 34503919 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Smriti Panda
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Pirabu Sakthivel
- KMCH Institute of Health Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, India.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wu O, McCartney E, Heggie R, Germeni E, Paul J, Soulis E, Dillon S, Ryan C, Sim M, Dixon-Hughes J, Agarwal R, Bodenham A, Menne T, Jones B, Moss J. Venous access devices for the delivery of long-term chemotherapy: the CAVA three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-126. [PMID: 34318743 DOI: 10.3310/hta25470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous access devices are used for patients receiving long-term chemotherapy. These include centrally inserted tunnelled catheters or Hickman-type devices (Hickman), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and centrally inserted totally implantable venous access devices (PORTs). OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of these devices for the central delivery of chemotherapy. DESIGN An open, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to inform three comparisons: (1) peripherally inserted central catheters versus Hickman, (2) PORTs versus Hickman and (3) PORTs versus peripherally inserted central catheters. Pre-trial and post-trial qualitative research and economic evaluation were also conducted. SETTING This took place in 18 UK oncology centres. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) receiving chemotherapy (≥ 12 weeks) for either a solid or a haematological malignancy were randomised via minimisation. INTERVENTIONS Hickman, peripherally inserted central catheters and PORTs. PRIMARY OUTCOME A composite of infection (laboratory confirmed, suspected catheter related and exit site infection), mechanical failure, venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, inability to aspirate blood and other complications in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS Overall, 1061 participants were recruited to inform three comparisons. First, for the comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters (n = 212) with Hickman (n = 212), it could not be concluded that peripherally inserted central catheters were significantly non-inferior to Hickman in terms of complication rate (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.71). The use of peripherally inserted central catheters compared with Hickman was associated with a substantially lower cost (-£1553) and a small decrement in quality-adjusted life-years gained (-0.009). Second, for the comparison of PORTs (n = 253) with Hickman (n = 303), PORTs were found to be statistically significantly superior to Hickman in terms of complication rate (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.77). PORTs were found to dominate Hickman with lower costs (-£45) and greater quality-adjusted life-years gained (0.004). This was alongside a lower complications rate (difference of 14%); the incremental cost per complication averted was £1.36. Third, for the comparison of PORTs (n = 147) with peripherally inserted central catheters (n = 199), PORTs were found to be statistically significantly superior to peripherally inserted central catheters in terms of complication rate (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.83). PORTs were associated with an incremental cost of £2706 when compared with peripherally inserted central catheters and a decrement in quality-adjusted life-years gained (-0.018) PORTs are dominated by peripherally inserted central catheters: alongside a lower complications rate (difference of 15%), the incremental cost per complication averted was £104. The qualitative work showed that attitudes towards all three devices were positive, with patients viewing their central venous access device as part of their treatment and recovery. PORTs were perceived to offer unique psychological benefits, including a greater sense of freedom and less intrusion in the context of personal relationships. The main limitation was the lack of adequate power (54%) in the non-inferiority comparison between peripherally inserted central catheters and Hickman. CONCLUSIONS In the delivery of long-term chemotherapy, peripherally inserted central catheters should be considered a cost-effective option when compared with Hickman. There were significant clinical benefits when comparing PORTs with Hickman and with peripherally inserted central catheters. The health economic benefits were less clear from the perspective of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained. However, dependent on the willingness to pay, PORTs may be considered to be cost-effective from the perspective of complications averted. FUTURE WORK The deliverability of a PORTs service merits further study to understand the barriers to and methods of improving the service. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN44504648. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NHIR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 47. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Wu
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Elaine McCartney
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Robert Heggie
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Evi Germeni
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - James Paul
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Eileen Soulis
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Susan Dillon
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Caoimhe Ryan
- School of Social Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Moira Sim
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Judith Dixon-Hughes
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Tobias Menne
- Haematology, Newcastle Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Brian Jones
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jonathan Moss
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fletcher JM, Saunders-Smith T, Manns BJ, Tsuyuki R, Hemmelgarn BR, Tonelli M, Campbell DJT. Pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:270. [PMID: 33129278 PMCID: PMC7603682 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01140-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although recruitment is a major challenge for most randomized controlled trials, few report on the difficulties of recruitment, or how it might be enhanced. The objective of our study was to qualitatively explore the experiences of both patients and pharmacists related to recruitment for ACCESS, a large trial involving low-income seniors, given that two of our most successful recruitment strategies were direct patient recruitment materials and use of community pharmacists. METHODS Using qualitative descriptive methods, we collected data from pharmacists and study participants. Pharmacists were asked about their impressions of the study, as well as challenges they faced and methods they used to recruit potential participants. Focus groups with trial participants centered on the patient recruitment materials. Interviews and focus groups were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Pharmacists noted that their first impressions of the study were positive as they described being enticed to help the study team by the potential benefit of copayment elimination for their patients and the low time commitment. Pharmacists noted they were more likely to recruit if they were well informed on the study, as they could answer their patients' questions. Participants noted that their primary motivations for participating were the tangible benefits of free medications and the intrinsic value of participating in research. CONCLUSIONS We noted that recruitment through pharmacies was an effective method as most patients have trusting relationships with their pharmacist. To optimize recruitment through pharmacies, study procedures should be straightforward, and pharmacists need to be equipped with good knowledge of the study. When promoting a study to potential participants, messaging should ensure the individuals are aware of the tangible benefits of participation while still presenting a full overview of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial Registration Number: NCT02579655 - initially registered Oct 19, 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M Fletcher
- Department of Ecosystem and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Terry Saunders-Smith
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Braden J Manns
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Ross Tsuyuki
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, 2J2.00 WC Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, 8440 112 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R7, Canada
| | - Brenda R Hemmelgarn
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Marcello Tonelli
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - David J T Campbell
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kim KN, Dyer MA, Qureshi MM, Shah NK, Grillone GA, Faden DL, Jalisi SM, Truong MT. Hypofractionated radiotherapy and surgery compared to standard radiotherapy in early glottic cancer. Am J Otolaryngol 2020; 41:102544. [PMID: 32505989 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early-stage glottic laryngeal cancer is treated with surgery or radiotherapy (RT), but limited randomized data exists to support one modality over the other. This study evaluates survival differences in early glottic cancer patients treated with either surgery or RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS 14,498 patients with early glottic cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 and treated with surgery or RT were identified in the National Cancer Database. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze differences in overall survival (OS) by treatment (surgery vs. RT) and radiation dose fractionation. Cox regression modeling and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis were performed. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed. RESULTS Median follow-up and median OS for all patients were 49.5 and 118 months, respectively. The estimated 5-year OS for surgery and RT was 77.5% and 72.6%, respectively (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, aHR (95% CI) for surgery compared to RT was 0.87 (0.81-0.94, P = 0.0004). Compared to RT regimen 63-67.5 Gray (Gy) in 28-30 fractions, worse survival was noted for RT regimen 66-70 Gy in 33-35 fractions (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23, P = 0.0003). When compared with hypofractionated RT (63-67.5 Gy in 28-30 fractions), patients undergoing surgery no longer showed improved OS (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.86-1.02, P = 0.154). The finding was confirmed on PSM analysis (surgery aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.05, P = 0.322). CONCLUSION In early glottic tumors, patients treated with surgery demonstrated improved survival compared to RT, but when hypofractionation was considered, there were no significant differences in OS between patients undergoing surgery or RT.
Collapse
|
21
|
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Wade J, Noble S, Garfield K, Young G, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Blazeby J, Bryant R, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Gnanapragasam V, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Paez E, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario D, Rowe E, Neal D. Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-176. [PMID: 32773013 PMCID: PMC7443739 DOI: 10.3310/hta24370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the UK. Prostate-specific antigen testing followed by biopsy leads to overdetection, overtreatment as well as undertreatment of the disease. Evidence of treatment effectiveness has lacked because of the paucity of randomised controlled trials comparing conventional treatments. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional treatments for localised prostate cancer (active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy) in men aged 50-69 years. DESIGN A prospective, multicentre prostate-specific antigen testing programme followed by a randomised trial of treatment, with a comprehensive cohort follow-up. SETTING Prostate-specific antigen testing in primary care and treatment in nine urology departments in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Between 2001 and 2009, 228,966 men aged 50-69 years received an invitation to attend an appointment for information about the Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study and a prostate-specific antigen test; 82,429 men were tested, 2664 were diagnosed with localised prostate cancer, 1643 agreed to randomisation to active monitoring (n = 545), radical prostatectomy (n = 553) or radical radiotherapy (n = 545) and 997 chose a treatment. INTERVENTIONS The interventions were active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy. TRIAL PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE Definite or probable disease-specific mortality at the 10-year median follow-up in randomised participants. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Overall mortality, metastases, disease progression, treatment complications, resource utilisation and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for 17 prostate cancer-specific (p = 0.48) and 169 all-cause (p = 0.87) deaths. Eight men died of prostate cancer in the active monitoring group (1.5 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.0); five died of prostate cancer in the radical prostatectomy group (0.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 2.2 per 1000 person years) and four died of prostate cancer in the radical radiotherapy group (0.7 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 2.0 per 1000 person years). More men developed metastases in the active monitoring group than in the radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy groups: active monitoring, n = 33 (6.3 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 4.5 to 8.8); radical prostatectomy, n = 13 (2.4 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 4.2 per 1000 person years); and radical radiotherapy, n = 16 (3.0 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 4.9 per 1000 person-years; p = 0.004). There were higher rates of disease progression in the active monitoring group than in the radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy groups: active monitoring (n = 112; 22.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 19.0 to 27.5 per 1000 person years); radical prostatectomy (n = 46; 8.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 6.7 to 11.9 per 1000 person-years); and radical radiotherapy (n = 46; 9.0 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 6.7 to 12.0 per 1000 person years; p < 0.001). Radical prostatectomy had the greatest impact on sexual function/urinary continence and remained worse than radical radiotherapy and active monitoring. Radical radiotherapy's impact on sexual function was greatest at 6 months, but recovered somewhat in the majority of participants. Sexual and urinary function gradually declined in the active monitoring group. Bowel function was worse with radical radiotherapy at 6 months, but it recovered with the exception of bloody stools. Urinary voiding and nocturia worsened in the radical radiotherapy group at 6 months but recovered. Condition-specific quality-of-life effects mirrored functional changes. No differences in anxiety/depression or generic or cancer-related quality of life were found. At the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the probabilities that each arm was the most cost-effective option were 58% (radical radiotherapy), 32% (active monitoring) and 10% (radical prostatectomy). LIMITATIONS A single prostate-specific antigen test and transrectal ultrasound biopsies were used. There were very few non-white men in the trial. The majority of men had low- and intermediate-risk disease. Longer follow-up is needed. CONCLUSIONS At a median follow-up point of 10 years, prostate cancer-specific mortality was low, irrespective of the assigned treatment. Radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy reduced disease progression and metastases, but with side effects. Further work is needed to follow up participants at a median of 15 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20141297. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 37. See the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - J Athene Lane
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter Holding
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julia Wade
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian Noble
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Grace Young
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Davis
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emma L Turner
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mary Robinson
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Eleanor Walsh
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Prasad Bollina
- Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Doble
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Gillatt
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Howard Kynaston
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Philip Powell
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Prescott
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Derek Rosario
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - David Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Davidson B, Gurusamy K, Corrigan N, Croft J, Ruddock S, Pullan A, Brown J, Twiddy M, Birtwistle J, Morris S, Woodward N, Bandula S, Hochhauser D, Prasad R, Olde Damink S, Coolson M, Laarhoven KV, de Wilt JH. Liver resection surgery compared with thermal ablation in high surgical risk patients with colorectal liver metastases: the LAVA international RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-38. [PMID: 32370822 DOI: 10.3310/hta24210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although surgical resection has been considered the only curative option for colorectal liver metastases, thermal ablation has recently been suggested as an alternative curative treatment. There have been no adequately powered trials comparing surgery with thermal ablation. OBJECTIVES Main objective - to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of thermal ablation versus liver resection surgery in high surgical risk patients who would be eligible for liver resection. Pilot study objectives - to assess the feasibility of recruitment (through qualitative study), to assess the quality of ablations and liver resection surgery to determine acceptable standards for the main trial and to centrally review the reporting of computed tomography scan findings relating to ablation and outcomes and recurrence rate in both arms. DESIGN A prospective, international (UK and the Netherlands), multicentre, open, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial with a 1-year internal pilot study. SETTING Tertiary liver, pancreatic and gallbladder (hepatopancreatobiliary) centres in the UK and the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS Adults with a specialist multidisciplinary team diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases who are at high surgical risk because of their age, comorbidities or tumour burden and who would be suitable for liver resection or thermal ablation. INTERVENTIONS Thermal ablation conducted as per local policy (but centres were encouraged to recruit within Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe guidelines) versus surgical liver resection performed as per centre protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Pilot study - patients' and clinicians' acceptability of the trial to assist in optimisation of recruitment. Primary outcome - disease-free survival at 2 years post randomisation. Secondary outcomes - overall survival, timing and site of recurrence, additional therapy after treatment failure, quality of life, complications, length of hospital stay, costs, trial acceptability, and disease-free survival measured from end of intervention. It was planned that 5-year survival data would be documented through record linkage. Randomisation was performed by minimisation incorporating a random element, and this was a non-blinded study. RESULTS In the pilot study over 1 year, a total of 366 patients with colorectal liver metastases were screened and 59 were considered eligible. Only nine participants were randomised. The trial was stopped early and none of the planned statistical analyses was performed. The key issues inhibiting recruitment included fewer than anticipated patients eligible for both treatments, misconceptions about the eligibility criteria for the trial, surgeons' preference for one of the treatments ('lack of clinical equipoise' among some of the surgeons in the centre) with unconscious bias towards surgery, patients' preference for one of the treatments, and lack of dedicated research nurses for the trial. CONCLUSIONS Recruitment feasibility was not demonstrated during the pilot stage of the trial; therefore, the trial closed early. In future, comparisons involving two very different treatments may benefit from an initial feasibility study or a longer period of internal pilot study to resolve these difficulties. Sufficient time should be allowed to set up arrangements through National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Networks. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52040363. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 21. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Davidson
- Royal Free Campus, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kurinchi Gurusamy
- Royal Free Campus, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Neil Corrigan
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Julie Croft
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sharon Ruddock
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alison Pullan
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Julia Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Maureen Twiddy
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Institute of Clinical and Applied Health Research, Faculty of Health Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | | | - Stephen Morris
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Raj Prasad
- Surgery and Transplantation, Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Marielle Coolson
- General Surgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - K van Laarhoven
- Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Phelps EE, Tutton E, Griffin X, Baird J. Facilitating trial recruitment: A qualitative study of patient and staff experiences of an orthopaedic trauma trial. Trials 2019; 20:492. [PMID: 31399134 PMCID: PMC6688236 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3597-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Qualitative research has been used to explore patients’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences of surgical randomised controlled trials (RCTs). From this research, reasons why patients accept or decline participation and barriers to engaging clinicians in trials have been identified. In a trauma setting, recruitment to surgical trials can be particularly difficult as patients may require urgent treatment and their ability to consider their options, ask questions and reach a decision may be hindered by the impact of their injury. Little research, however, has explored patients’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences of surgical RCTs in a trauma setting. This study aimed to understand patients’ and staff’s experiences of an orthopaedic trauma trial. Methods We carried out semi-structured interviews with 11 patients and 24 staff (10 surgeons and 14 research associates) participating in a UK multi-centre feasibility trial comparing intramedullary nails versus distal locking plates for fractures of the distal femur (TrAFFix). Interviews explored patients’ experience of TrAFFix and their reason for participating and staffs' experience of recruiting to TrAFFix and trauma trials more generally. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Three themes were identified. These were i) navigating research with patients after orthopaedic trauma, ii) knowing that it is the right decision and iii) making it work. These themes reflect: i) how research associates supported and guided patients through the consent process enabling them to participate, ii) the difficulty in engaging surgeons in a trial when individual equipoise and experience of the interventions are low despite the presence of community equipoise and iii) the way in which research teams worked together and encouraged the development of a research culture within the clinical teams in order to facilitate recruitment. Conclusions Our findings highlight the pivotal role of research associates (RAs) in facilitating trial recruitment. RAs supported patients to enable them to make a decision about participation and assisted in developing a research culture within the team by promoting studies and communicating research to clinical staff. Our findings also reinforce surgeons’ difficulty with equipoise and suggest that accepting community equipoise could facilitate recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Elizabeth Phelps
- NDORMS, Kadoorie Centre, level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Elizabeth Tutton
- NDORMS, Kadoorie Centre, level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. .,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. .,Warwick Research in Nursing, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
| | - Xavier Griffin
- NDORMS, Kadoorie Centre, level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Janis Baird
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mather M, Hamilton D, Robalino S, Rousseau N. Going where other methods cannot: A systematic mapping review of 25 years of qualitative research in Otolaryngology. Clin Otolaryngol 2018; 43:1443-1453. [DOI: 10.1111/coa.13200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2017] [Revised: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M.W. Mather
- Institute of Cellular Medicine; Newcastle University; Newcastle-upon-Tyne UK
- Freeman Hospital; Newcastle-upon-Tyne UK
| | - D. Hamilton
- Freeman Hospital; Newcastle-upon-Tyne UK
- Institute of Health & Society; Newcastle University; Newcastle-upon-Tyne UK
| | - S. Robalino
- Institute of Health & Society; Newcastle University; Newcastle-upon-Tyne UK
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center; Center for Health Research; Portland Oregon
| | - N. Rousseau
- Institute of Health & Society; Newcastle University; Newcastle-upon-Tyne UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhu X, Zhu R. Curcumin suppresses the progression of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma through the upregulation of miR-145 and inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Onco Targets Ther 2018; 11:3521-3531. [PMID: 29950857 PMCID: PMC6016259 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s159236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Curcumin is a polyphenol extracted from the rhizomes of Curcuma longa with extensive biological and pharmacological effects. The present study aimed to investigate the mechanisms of curcumin in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Methods Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was performed to detect the expressions of miR-145 in LSCC tissues and cells. The effects of miR-145 and curcumin on cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle, migration and invasion were explored by MTT assay, flow cytometry analysis, Transwell migration and invasion assay, respectively. The effects of miR-145 combined with curcumin on the phosphoinositol 1,3 kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway were detected by Western blot analysis. Results miR-145 was significantly downregulated in LSCC tissues and cells. Curcumin administration upregulated miR-145 expression in LSCC cells in a dose-dependent manner. miR-145 overexpression and curcumin treatment both markedly suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion and induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in LSCC cells. Moreover, curcumin treatment reversed the enhanced effects on cell viability, migration and invasion and the inhibitory effects on apoptosis conferred by anti-miR-145 in LSCC cells. Curcumin treatment dramatically aggravated miR-145-induced inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and reversed anti-miR-145-mediated activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in LSCC cells. Conclusion Curcumin suppressed LSCC progression through the upregulation of miR-145 and inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofeng Zhu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ronghua Zhu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250013, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gurusamy K, Corrigan N, Croft J, Twiddy M, Morris S, Woodward N, Bandula S, Hochhauser D, Napp V, Pullan A, Jakowiw N, Prasad R, Damink SO, van Laarhoven CJHM, de Wilt JHW, Brown J, Davidson BR. Liver resection surgery versus thermal ablation for colorectal LiVer MetAstases (LAVA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:105. [PMID: 29439711 PMCID: PMC5811975 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2499-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although surgical resection has been considered the only curative option for colorectal liver metastases (CLM), thermal ablation has recently been suggested as an alternative curative treatment. A prospective randomised trial is required to define the efficacy of resection vs ablation for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Methods Design and setting: This is a multicentre, open, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial design with internal pilot and will be performed in tertiary liver centres in UK and The Netherlands. Participants: Eligible patients will be those with colorectal liver metastases at high surgical risk because of their age, co-morbidities or tumour burden and who would be suitable for liver resection or thermal ablation. Intervention: Thermal ablation as per local policy. Control: Surgical liver resection performed as per centre protocol. Co-interventions: Further chemotherapy will be offered to patients as per current practice. Outcomes Pilot study: Same as main study and in addition patients and clinicians’ acceptability of the trial to assist in optimisation of recruitment. Primary outcome: Disease-free survival (DFS) at two years post randomisation. Secondary outcomes: Overall survival, timing and site of recurrence, additional therapy after treatment failure, quality of life, complications, length of hospital stay, costs, trial acceptability, DFS measured from end of intervention. Follow-up: 24 months from randomisation; five-year follow-up for overall survival. Sample size: 330 patients to demonstrate non-inferiority of thermal ablation. Discussion This trial will determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of thermal ablation vs surgical resection for high-risk people with colorectal liver metastases, and guide the optimal treatment for these patients. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN52040363. Registered on 9 March 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2499-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurinchi Gurusamy
- Royal Free Campus, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, NW3 2PF, London, UK
| | - Neil Corrigan
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Julie Croft
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Maureen Twiddy
- Institute of Clinical and Applied Health Research, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nick Woodward
- Department of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Steve Bandula
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Vicky Napp
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alison Pullan
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nicholas Jakowiw
- Royal Free Campus, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, NW3 2PF, London, UK
| | - Raj Prasad
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Steven Olde Damink
- Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Royal Free Campus, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, NW3 2PF, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Metcalfe C, Avery K, Berrisford R, Barham P, Noble SM, Fernandez AM, Hanna G, Goldin R, Elliott J, Wheatley T, Sanders G, Hollowood A, Falk S, Titcomb D, Streets C, Donovan JL, Blazeby JM. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) feasibility study and pilot trial. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-68. [PMID: 27373720 DOI: 10.3310/hta20480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Localised oesophageal cancer can be curatively treated with surgery (oesophagectomy) but the procedure is complex with a risk of complications, negative effects on quality of life and a recovery period of 6-9 months. Minimal-access surgery may accelerate recovery. OBJECTIVES The ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) study aimed to establish the feasibility of, and methodology for, a definitive trial comparing minimally invasive and open surgery for oesophagectomy. Objectives were to quantify the number of eligible patients in a pilot trial; develop surgical manuals as the basis for quality assurance; standardise pathological processing; establish a method to blind patients to their allocation in the first week post surgery; identify measures of postsurgical outcome of importance to patients and clinicians; and establish the main cost differences between the surgical approaches. DESIGN Pilot parallel three-arm randomised controlled trial nested within feasibility work. SETTING Two UK NHS departments of upper gastrointestinal surgery. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged ≥ 18 years with histopathological evidence of oesophageal or oesophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma, squamous cell cancer or high-grade dysplasia, referred for oesophagectomy or oesophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. INTERVENTIONS Oesophagectomy, with patients randomised to open surgery, a hybrid open chest and minimally invasive abdomen or totally minimally invasive access. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The primary outcome measure for the pilot trial was the number of patients recruited per month, with the main trial considered feasible if at least 2.5 patients per month were recruited. RESULTS During 21 months of recruitment, 263 patients were assessed for eligibility; of these, 135 (51%) were found to be eligible and 104 (77%) agreed to participate, an average of five patients per month. In total, 41 patients were allocated to open surgery, 43 to the hybrid procedure and 20 to totally minimally invasive surgery. Recruitment is continuing, allowing a seamless transition into the definitive trial. Consequently, the database is unlocked at the time of writing and data presented here are for patients recruited by 31 August 2014. Random allocation achieved a good balance between the arms of the study, which, as a high proportion of patients underwent their allocated surgery (69/79, 87%), ensured a fair comparison between the interventions. Dressing patients with large bandages, covering all possible incisions, was successful in keeping patients blind while pain was assessed during the first week post surgery. Postsurgical length of stay and risk of adverse events were within the typical range for this group of patients, with one death occurring within 30 days among 76 patients. There were good completion rates for the assessment of pain at 6 days post surgery (88%) and of the patient-reported outcomes at 6 weeks post randomisation (74%). CONCLUSIONS Rapid recruitment to the pilot trial and the successful refinement of methodology indicated the feasibility of a definitive trial comparing different approaches to oesophagectomy. Although we have shown a full trial of open compared with minimally invasive oesophagectomy to be feasible, this is necessarily based on our findings from the two clinical centres that we could include in this small preliminary study. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN59036820. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 48. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kerry Avery
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Berrisford
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Paul Barham
- Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian M Noble
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - George Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Goldin
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jackie Elliott
- Gastro-Oesophageal Support and Help Group, Kingswood, Bristol, UK
| | - Timothy Wheatley
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Grant Sanders
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Andrew Hollowood
- Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Stephen Falk
- Bristol Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Dan Titcomb
- Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Christopher Streets
- Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jenny L Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Leighton PA, Brealey SD, Dias JJ. Interventions to improve retention in a surgical, clinical trial: A pragmatic, stakeholder-driven approach. J Evid Based Med 2018; 11:12-19. [PMID: 29356437 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 07/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore stakeholder perspectives upon participant retention in clinical trials, and to generate strategies to support retention in a surgical, clinical trial. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING The SWIFFT trial is a multicenter study comparing treatments for the fracture of the waist of the scaphoid bone in adults. Here we report upon a multistage, iterative consultative process with SWIFFT stakeholders, these include workshops with members of the public, with nurses involved in data collection, and with consultant clinicians. Structured discussions were digitally recorded and transcribed, data were handled and analyzed following a framework approach to qualitative data analysis. RESULTS Removing practical barriers were identified as important factors in supporting retention. Stakeholders also identified that (i) how well a study is understood and (ii) how much it is valued are important factors in an individual's willingness to maintain their involvement. A number of strategies resulted from this consultation, these include: in-clinic data collection, co-ordinated clinical and research appointments, a SWIFFT website, and newsletter. CONCLUSION A participatory approach to trial retention might engage all relevant stakeholders in the delivery of a clinical trial, it might also support the generation of specific and contextually relevant solutions to the challenge of participant retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Leighton
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stephen D Brealey
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Joseph J Dias
- Clinical Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Treatment options for early laryngeal cancer are well established with good local control and 5-year survival. The commonest treatments are radiotherapy or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). There are advantages and disadvantages of the different modalities, but debate continues regarding the voice outcomes posttreatment. This review will focus on early glottic carcinoma and voice outcomes following the different treatments. RECENT FINDINGS TLM and radiotherapy are both likely to affect voice quality, but the extent of voice change depends on different factors. These factors can be divided into patient, tumour and treatment factors. Recent meta-analyses data show similar voice outcomes for either modality in the treatment of early glottic carcinoma. However, larger tumours and those involving the anterior commissure are associated with worse voice outcomes. SUMMARY There are various considerations for the patient and clinician before deciding on the preferred treatment for early glottic carcinoma. Although both TLM and radiotherapy will affect voice outcomes, the recent meta-analyses show similar voice outcomes for either modality in the treatment of early glottic carcinoma. There are numerous variables in the published studies hindering direct comparisons. These include heterogeneous patient groups, different treatment standardization and methods of voice analysis.
Collapse
|
30
|
Understanding and Improving Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Qualitative Research Approaches. Eur Urol 2017; 72:789-798. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
31
|
Mou S, Zhou Z, He Y, Liu F, Gong L. Curcumin inhibits cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells through Bcl-2 and PI3K/Akt, and by upregulating miR-15a. Oncol Lett 2017; 14:4937-4942. [PMID: 29085504 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Accepted: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Curcumin is a natural compound extracted from the dried rhizomes of Curcuma (curcuma root or zedoary) that exhibits extensive pharmacological effects and low toxicity. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether curcumin inhibits cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis of laryngeal cancer through Bcl-2 and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt), and by upregulating microRNA-15a (miR-15a). It was demonstrated that curcumin inhibits cell proliferation, and promotes apoptosis and increased caspase-3 activity of human laryngeal cancer cells. Furthermore, curcumin decreased Bcl-2 and PI3K protein expression, and decreased the phospho (p)-Akt protein expression of human laryngeal cancer cells. Furthermore, curcumin activated miR-15a expression by human laryngeal cancer cells. Suppression of miR-15a expression reversed the anticancer effect of curcumin on cell proliferation of human laryngeal cancer cells and increased Bcl-2 and PI3K/Akt protein expression in AMC-HN-8 cells treated with 40 µM of curcumin. The results of the present study suggest that curcumin inhibits cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells through Bcl-2 and PI3K/Akt, and by upregulating miR-15a.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaofeng Mou
- Department of Otolaryngology, Liaocheng City People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, P.R. China
| | - Zhongxin Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology, Liaocheng City People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, P.R. China
| | - Yukai He
- Department of Infection, Liaocheng City People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, P.R. China
| | - Fuxing Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Liaocheng City People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, P.R. China
| | - Lili Gong
- Department of Otolaryngology, Liaocheng City People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong 252000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kjær TK, Mellemgaard A, Stensøe Oksen M, Andreassen Rix B, Karlsen R, Johansen C, Dalton SO. Recruiting newly referred lung cancer patients to a patient navigator intervention (PACO): lessons learnt from a pilot study. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:335-341. [PMID: 28094601 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1267871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The incidence of and survival from lung cancer are associated with socioeconomic position, and disparities have been observed in both curative and palliative treatment for lung cancer. 'Patient navigation' is valuable in addressing health disparity, with timely treatment and transition to care. We conducted a pilot study to test the feasibility of a patient navigator program (PAtient COach) for newly diagnosed lung cancer. We present the trial, the findings from the pilot study and discuss factors that might have affected recruitment rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS We invited 24 lung cancer patients referred for chemotherapy to the Oncology Department at Herlev University Hospital, Denmark, to participate in the pilot study. To be eligible, patients had to live alone, have no formal education beyond secondary school, have one or more comorbid conditions, have a performance status of 1 or 2 or be over 65 years of age. The patient navigators targeted four phases of treatment: planning, initiation, compliance and end of treatment. RESULTS Six months after the start of the study, we had recruited only six patients, due mainly to inherent patient resistance and because only 50% of eligible patients were invited. Of the 18 patients who did not wish to participate, 13 agreed to fill in a baseline questionnaire. The most frequent reason given for not wanting to participate was a belief that a patient navigator would be of no benefit. CONCLUSIONS The pilot study met a number of internal and external obstacles to patients' recruitment. The study provides insight into the barriers to recruitment of socially disadvantaged cancer patients to clinical trials and will inform future trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trille Kristina Kjær
- Unit of Survivorship, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Mellemgaard
- Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Bo Andreassen Rix
- Department of Patient Support and Community Activities, Danish Cancer Society, Denmark
| | - Randi Karlsen
- Unit of Survivorship, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Unit of Survivorship, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prettyjohns M, Winter S, Kerawala C, Paleri V. Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiation therapy in the management of T1 and T2 laryngeal glottic carcinoma: which modality is cost-effective within the UK? Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42:404-415. [PMID: 27966287 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the most cost-effective treatment strategy in patients with early stage (T1 and T2) cancers of the laryngeal glottis. DESIGN A Markov decision model populated using data from updated systematic reviews and meta-analyses, with attributable costs from NHS sources. Data on local control and mortality were obtained from updates of existing systematic reviews conducted for the NICE guideline on cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract. Procedure costs were sourced from NHS reference costs 2013/14 by applying tariffs associated with the appropriate health resource group code SETTING: The UK National Health Service. POPULATION Patients with early stage (T1 and T2) cancers of the laryngeal glottis. INTERVENTIONS Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and radiation therapy (RT). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Total costs, incremental costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 10-year time horizon. RESULTS Radiation therapy as the initial treatment strategy was found to be more expensive (£2654 versus £623) and less effective (QALY reduction of 0.141 and 0.04 in T1a and T1b-T2 laryngeal cancers, respectively) than TLM. The dominance of TLM for T1a cancers was unchanged in most scenarios modelled in sensitivity analysis. For T1b-T2 laryngeal cancers, the result changed in numerous scenarios. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, TLM was found to have a 71% and 58% probability of being cost-effective in T1a and T1b-T2 laryngeal cancers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Transoral laser microsurgery is a cost-effective strategy to adopt in the management of T1a laryngeal cancers. Uncertainty remains over the optimal strategy to adopt in T1b-T2 laryngeal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Prettyjohns
- National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Winter
- Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | | | - V Paleri
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wiegand S. Evidence and evidence gaps of laryngeal cancer surgery. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2016; 15:Doc03. [PMID: 28025603 PMCID: PMC5169076 DOI: 10.3205/cto000130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer has been established for decades. In addition to total laryngectomy, which was first performed in 1873, a large number or organ preservation surgical techniques, like open partial laryngectomy, transoral laser microsurgery, and transoral robotic surgery have been developed. Studies on laryngeal cancer surgery are mainly retrospective case series and cohort studies. The evolution of chemoradiation protocols and their analysis in prospective randomized trials have led to an increasing acceptance of non-surgical treatment procedures. In addition to an improvement of prognosis, in recent years the preservation of function and maintenance of life quality after primary therapy of laryngeal cancer has increasingly become the focus of therapy planning. Significant late toxicity after chemoradiation has been identified as an important issue. This leads to a reassessment of surgical concepts and initiation of studies on laryngeal cancer surgery which was additionally stimulated by the advent of transoral robotic surgery in the US. Improving the evidence base of laryngeal cancer surgery by successful establishment of surgical trials should be the future goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Wiegand
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Warner L, Lee K, Homer JJ. Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiotherapy for T2 glottic squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of local control outcomes. Clin Otolaryngol 2016; 42:629-636. [PMID: 27863075 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews comparing treatment of early glottic cancer with transoral surgery or radiotherapy demonstrate similar oncological outcomes. Most studies of 'early-stage' laryngeal cancer include Tis, T1a, T1b and T2 cases. The data are dominated by patients with T1 and Tis tumours, although extrapolating these results and applying them for T2 cases may be inappropriate. No previous systematic reviews have focused on T2 cancers as a separate group. OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW This review compares local control outcomes for T2 glottic squamous cell carcinoma, treated with transoral microsurgery or external beam radiotherapy. TYPE OF REVIEW This is a systematic review of case series and comparison studies, focusing on oncological outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY Independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database were conducted by two authors, using the search terms: laryngeal/glottic/vocal cord combined with carcinoma/cancer/tumour and laser/microsurgery or radiotherapy. Studies of adult patients treated for primary T2N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with laser surgery or curative radiotherapy were included. EVALUATION METHOD Full text of studies satisfying the inclusion criteria were reviewed with extraction of local control and survival data and laryngeal preservation rates. The primary endpoint is local control at 5 years. RESULTS Initial searches identified 3252 studies. Following full-text review of 183 papers, 59 studies met the inclusion criteria, all level IV evidence. A total of 48 studies specified 5-year local control for 1156 patients treated with transoral laser surgery and 3191 patients treated with radiotherapy. Weighted averages of local control at 5 years demonstrated similar results: 75.81% for radiotherapy versus 77.26% for transoral laser surgery. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review indicate no difference in 5-year local control between radiotherapy and transoral surgery for T2 glottic SCC. The data demonstrated higher rates of local failure for T2b compared with T2a cases, although outcomes were similar between laser excision and radiotherapy for each substage. Further research focusing upon functional outcomes for T2 glottic tumours is imperative to guide decision-making, ideally with subgroup analysis of T2a and T2b cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Warner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Head and Neck Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - K Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Head and Neck Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - J J Homer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Head and Neck Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Thomas KS, Batchelor JM, Bath-Hextall F, Chalmers JR, Clarke T, Crowe S, Delamere FM, Eleftheriadou V, Evans N, Firkins L, Greenlaw N, Lansbury L, Lawton S, Layfield C, Leonardi-Bee J, Mason J, Mitchell E, Nankervis H, Norrie J, Nunn A, Ormerod AD, Patel R, Perkins W, Ravenscroft JC, Schmitt J, Simpson E, Whitton ME, Williams HC. A programme of research to set priorities and reduce uncertainties for the prevention and treatment of skin disease. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar04180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundSkin diseases are very common and can have a large impact on the quality of life of patients and caregivers. This programme addressed four diseases: (1) eczema, (2) vitiligo, (3) squamous cell skin cancer (SCC) and (4) pyoderma gangrenosum (PG).ObjectiveTo set priorities and reduce uncertainties for the treatment and prevention of skin disease in our four chosen diseases.DesignMixed methods including eight systematic reviews, three prioritisation exercises, two pilot randomised controlled trials (RCTs), three feasibility studies, two core outcome initiatives, four funding proposals for national RCTs and one completed national RCT.SettingSecondary care, primary care and the general population.ParticipantsPatients (and their caregivers) with eczema, vitiligo, SCC and PG, plus health-care professionals with an interest in skin disease.InterventionsOur three intervention studies included (1) barrier enhancement using emollients from birth to prevent eczema (pilot RCT); (2) handheld narrowband ultraviolet light B therapy for treating vitiligo (pilot RCT); and (3) oral ciclosporin (Neoral®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) compared with oral prednisolone for managing PG (pragmatic national RCT).ResultsSystematic reviews included two overarching systematic reviews of RCTs of treatments for eczema and vitiligo, an umbrella review of systematic reviews of interventions for the prevention of eczema, two reviews of treatments for SCC (one included RCTs and the second included observational studies), and three reviews of outcome measures and outcome reporting. Three prioritisation partnership exercises identified 26 priority areas for future research in eczema, vitiligo and SCC. Two international consensus initiatives identified four core domains for future eczema trials and seven core domains for vitiligo trials. Two pilot RCTs and three feasibility studies critically informed development of four trial proposals for external funding, three of which are now funded and one is pending consideration by funders. Our pragmatic RCT tested the two commonly used systemic treatments for PG (prednisolone vs. ciclosporin) and found no difference in their clinical effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. Both drugs showed limited benefit. Only half of the participants’ ulcers had healed by 6 months. For those with healed ulcers, recurrence was common (30%). Different side effect profiles were noted for each drug, which can inform clinical decisions on an individual patient basis. Three researchers were trained to PhD level and a dermatology patient panel was established to ensure patient involvement in all aspects of the programme.ConclusionsFindings from this programme of work have already informed clinical guidelines and patient information resources. Feasibility studies have ensured that large national pragmatic trials will now be conducted on important areas of treatment uncertainty that address the needs of patients and the NHS. There is scope for considerable improvement in terms of trial design, conduct and reporting for RCTs of skin disease, which can be improved through wider collaboration, registration of trial protocols and complete reporting and international consensus over core outcome sets. Three national trials have now been funded as a result of this work. Two international initiatives to establish how best to measure the core outcome domains for eczema and vitiligo are ongoing.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials Barrier Enhancement for Eczema Prevention (BEEP) (ISRCTN84854178 and NCT01142999), Study of Treatments fOr Pyoderma GAngrenosum Patients (STOP GAP) (ISRCTN35898459) and Hand Held NB-UVB for Early or Focal Vitiligo at Home (HI-Light Pilot Trial) (NCT01478945).FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 4, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Joanne R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tessa Clarke
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Finola M Delamere
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Nicholas Evans
- Trust Headquarters, West Hertfordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Hemel Hempstead, UK
| | - Lester Firkins
- Strategy and Development Group, James Lind Alliance, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicola Greenlaw
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Louise Lansbury
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sandra Lawton
- Dermatology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Carron Layfield
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jo Leonardi-Bee
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - James Mason
- School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Eleanor Mitchell
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Helen Nankervis
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrew Nunn
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ramesh Patel
- Radcliffe-on-Trent Health Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - William Perkins
- Dermatology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jane C Ravenscroft
- Dermatology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Eric Simpson
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Maxine E Whitton
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hilton P, Buckley BS, McColl E, Howel D, Tincello DG, Brennand C. Understanding variations in patient screening and recruitment in a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial: a vignette-based study. Trials 2016; 17:522. [PMID: 27782847 PMCID: PMC5080689 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1652-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The INVESTIGATE-I study was designed to inform a future definitive randomised trial of invasive urodynamic testing, compared to basic clinical assessment with noninvasive tests prior to surgical treatment, in women with stress urinary incontinence or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence. In a pilot randomised controlled trial, women from seven participating sites were screened, consented and randomised. Overall, 771 patients were identified from clinic notes and correspondence as being potential recruits and were sent the Patient Information Leaflet. Of those screened, 284 were deemed eligible, giving an overall 'screen positive' rate of 37 %. The numbers screened at individual centres varied between 14 and 399; the 'screen positive' rate varied between 22 and 79 % and the percentage of eligible women recruited varied between 55 and 100 %. The aim of this additional substudy was to explore why 'screen positive' rates may have varied so widely between apparently similar sites. RESULTS All 11 trial staff involved in screening in the seven recruiting sites were asked to evaluate a series of 20 identical vignettes, mainly based on actual general practitioner referral letters. Of the vignettes, 16 mentioned one or more definite inclusion criteria; the remainder had possible inclusions. Four had definite exclusions; 12 had possible exclusions. Free-text comments were sought to clarify the screeners' decisions. For six vignettes everyone agreed that the patient was eligible; for one all agreed she was not eligible; the breakdown for the remainder was mixed. Free-text comments illuminated uncertainties that may have led to variability in judging potential eligibility. CONCLUSIONS Variability in judgements about potential trial eligibility highlights the importance of explicit and objective inclusion and exclusion criteria, and of agreed strategies for making judgements when information is missing. During the development and planning of trials, vignettes might be a valuable tool for training those involved in screening and recruiting patients, for identifying potential problems and ensuring greater consistency in the application of eligibility criteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISTCTN registry: ISRCTN71327395 , registered on 7 June 2010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Hilton
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH UK
| | - Brian S. Buckley
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland UK
- Department of Surgery, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
| | - Elaine McColl
- Institute for Health and Society, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH UK
| | - Denise Howel
- Institute for Health and Society, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH UK
| | - Douglas G. Tincello
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH UK
| | - Catherine Brennand
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Health and Society, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE UK
| | - on behalf of the INVESTIGATE studies group
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH UK
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland UK
- Department of Surgery, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
- Institute for Health and Society, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH UK
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH UK
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Institute for Health and Society, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AE UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rooshenas L, Elliott D, Wade J, Jepson M, Paramasivan S, Strong S, Wilson C, Beard D, Blazeby JM, Birtle A, Halliday A, Rogers CA, Stein R, Donovan JL. Conveying Equipoise during Recruitment for Clinical Trials: Qualitative Synthesis of Clinicians' Practices across Six Randomised Controlled Trials. PLoS Med 2016; 13:e1002147. [PMID: 27755555 PMCID: PMC5068710 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 09/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for evidence-based medicine and increasingly rely on front-line clinicians to recruit eligible patients. Clinicians' difficulties with negotiating equipoise is assumed to undermine recruitment, although these issues have not yet been empirically investigated in the context of observable events. We aimed to investigate how clinicians conveyed equipoise during RCT recruitment appointments across six RCTs, with a view to (i) identifying practices that supported or hindered equipoise communication and (ii) exploring how clinicians' reported intentions compared with their actual practices. METHODS AND FINDINGS Six pragmatic UK-based RCTs were purposefully selected to include several clinical specialties (e.g., oncology, surgery) and types of treatment comparison. The RCTs were all based in secondary-care hospitals (n = 16) around the UK. Clinicians recruiting to the RCTs were interviewed (n = 23) to understand their individual sense of equipoise about the RCT treatments and their intentions for communicating equipoise to patients. Appointments in which these clinicians presented the RCT to trial-eligible patients were audio-recorded (n = 105). The appointments were analysed using thematic and content analysis approaches to identify practices that supported or challenged equipoise communication. A sample of appointments was independently coded by three researchers to optimise reliability in reported findings. Clinicians and patients provided full written consent to be interviewed and have appointments audio-recorded. Interviews revealed that clinicians' sense of equipoise varied: although all were uncertain about which trial treatment was optimal, they expressed different levels of uncertainty, ranging from complete ambivalence to clear beliefs that one treatment was superior. Irrespective of their personal views, all clinicians intended to set their personal biases aside to convey trial treatments neutrally to patients (in accordance with existing evidence). However, equipoise was omitted or compromised in 48/105 (46%) of the recorded appointments. Three commonly recurring practices compromised equipoise communication across the RCTs, irrespective of clinical context. First, equipoise was overridden by clinicians offering treatment recommendations when patients appeared unsure how to proceed or when they asked for the clinician's expert advice. Second, clinicians contradicted equipoise by presenting imbalanced descriptions of trial treatments that conflicted with scientific information stated in the RCT protocols. Third, equipoise was undermined by clinicians disclosing their personal opinions or predictions about trial outcomes, based on their intuition and experience. These broad practices were particularly demonstrated by clinicians who had indicated in interviews that they held less balanced views about trial treatments. A limitation of the study was that clinicians volunteering to take part in the research might have had a particular interest in improving their communication skills. However, the frequency of occurrence of equipoise issues across the RCTs suggests that the findings are likely to be reflective of clinical recruiters' practices more widely. CONCLUSIONS Communicating equipoise is a challenging process that is easily disrupted. Clinicians' personal views about trial treatments encroached on their ability to convey equipoise to patients. Clinicians should be encouraged to reflect on personal biases and be mindful of the common ways in which these can arise in their discussions with patients. Common pitfalls that recurred irrespective of RCT context indicate opportunities for specific training in communication skills that would be broadly applicable to a wide clinical audience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Rooshenas
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Daisy Elliott
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Wade
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Marcus Jepson
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sangeetha Paramasivan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Strong
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Wilson
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - David Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jane M. Blazeby
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
| | | | - Chris A. Rogers
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Stein
- University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny L. Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fogarty GB, Hong A, Gondi V, Burmeister B, Jacobsen K, Lo S, Paton E, Shivalingam B, Thompson JF. Debate: adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy or not? More data is the wiser choice. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:372. [PMID: 27370683 PMCID: PMC4930567 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2433-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Every year 170,000 patients are diagnosed with brain metastases (BMs) in the United States. Traditionally, adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy (AWBRT) has been offered following local therapy with neurosurgery (NSx) and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to BMs. The aim is to increase intracranial control, thereby decreasing symptoms from intracranial progression and a neurological death. There is a rapidly evolving change in the radiation treatment of BMs happening around the world. AWBRT is now being passed over in favour of repeat scanning at regular intervals and more local therapies as more BMs appear radiologically, BMs that may never become symptomatic. This change has happened after the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) in Item 5 of its “Choosing Wisely 2014” list recommended: “Don't routinely add adjuvant whole brain radiation therapy to SRS for limited brain metastases”. The guidelines are supposed to be based on the highest evidence to hand at the time. This article debates that the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to this recommendation consistently showed AWBRT significantly increases intracranial control, and avoids a neurological death, what it is meant to do. It also points out that, despite the enormity of the problem, only 774 patients in total had been randomised over more than three decades. These trials were heterogeneous in many respects. This data can, at best, be regarded as preliminary. In particular, there are no single histology AWBRT trials yet completed. A phase two trial investigating hippocampal avoiding AWBRT (HAWBRT) showed significantly less NCF decline compared to historical controls. We now need more randomised data to confirm the benefit of adjuvant HAWBRT. However, the ASTRO Guideline has particularly impacted accrual to trials investigating this, especially the international ANZMTG 01.07 WBRTMel trial. This is an RCT investigating AWBRT following local treatment in patients with one to three BMs from melanoma. WBRTMel has accrued 196 of a required 220 to date but accrual has slowed. HAWBRT may now never be tested in a randomised setting. Encouraging more data in AWBRT is the wiser choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald B Fogarty
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Poche Centre, North Sydney, Australia. .,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. .,Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group (ANZMTG), North Sydney, Australia. .,Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), Newcastle, Australia. .,Mater Sydney Radiation Oncology, PO Box 1003, Crows Nest, 1585, Australia.
| | - Angela Hong
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Poche Centre, North Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group (ANZMTG), North Sydney, Australia
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Central Dupage Hospital Cancer Center, Warrenville, IL, USA.,University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Bryan Burmeister
- Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group (ANZMTG), North Sydney, Australia.,Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), Newcastle, Australia.,Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kari Jacobsen
- Oslo University Hospital HF, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Serigne Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Poche Centre, North Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group (ANZMTG), North Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Paton
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group (ANZMTG), North Sydney, Australia
| | | | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Poche Centre, North Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group (ANZMTG), North Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Donovan JL, Rooshenas L, Jepson M, Elliott D, Wade J, Avery K, Mills N, Wilson C, Paramasivan S, Blazeby JM. Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI). Trials 2016; 17:283. [PMID: 27278130 PMCID: PMC4898358 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1391-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2015] [Accepted: 05/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered essential to determine effective interventions for routine clinical practice, but many fail to recruit participants efficiently, and some really important RCTs are not undertaken because recruitment is thought to be too difficult. The ‘QuinteT Recruitment Intervention’ (QRI) aims to facilitate informed decision making by patients about RCT participation and to increase recruitment. This paper presents the development and implementation of the QRI. Methods The QRI developed iteratively as a complex intervention. It emerged from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) ProtecT trial and has been developed further in 13 RCTs. The final version of the QRI uses a combination of standard and innovative qualitative research methods with some simple quantification to understand recruitment and identify sources of difficulties. Results The QRI has two major phases: understanding recruitment as it happens and then developing a plan of action to address identified difficulties and optimise informed consent in collaboration with the RCT chief investigator (CI) and the Clinical Trials Unit (CTU). The plan of action usually includes RCT-specific, as well as generic, aspects. The QRI can be used in two ways: it can be integrated into the feasibility/pilot or main phase of an RCT to prevent difficulties developing and optimise recruitment from the start, or it can be applied to an ongoing RCT experiencing recruitment shortfalls, with a view to rapidly improving recruitment and informed consent or gathering evidence to justify RCT closure. Conclusions The QRI provides a flexible way of understanding recruitment difficulties and producing a plan to address them while ensuring engaged and well-informed decision making by patients. It can facilitate recruitment to the most controversial and important RCTs. QRIs are likely to be of interest to the CIs and CTUs developing proposals for ‘difficult’ RCTs or for RCTs with lower than expected recruitment and to the funding bodies wishing to promote efficient recruitment in pragmatic RCTs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1391-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny L Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK. .,Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West at University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
| | - Marcus Jepson
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
| | - Daisy Elliott
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
| | - Julia Wade
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
| | - Kerry Avery
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
| | - Nicola Mills
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
| | - Caroline Wilson
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
| | - Sangeetha Paramasivan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Exploring Attitudes towards a Randomised Controlled Trial of Venous access Devices – a Nested Pre-trial Qualitative Study. J Vasc Access 2015; 16:407-12. [DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This pre-trial qualitative research study was carried out to explore patient and clinical staff attitudes to central venous access devices (CVADs). In addition, views about participation in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) were explored with the aim of maximising recruitment to an imminent RCT of three CVADs. Methods Three patient focus groups (each comprising three patients) and 23 interviews with clinical staff were conducted. Interviews and focus group discussions were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised, uploaded to the QSR NVivo10 qualitative software programme and thematically analysed. Results Analysis of focus group interviews revealed the added challenges that a CVAD poses to patients with cancer. Four key themes emerged: continuity of daily life, pain and discomfort, stigma (a mark of disgrace associated with certain conditions) and self-preservation. The findings show the impact of a CVAD on patients’ ability to manage their condition. Clinical staff interviews highlighted several potential barriers to recruitment; a lack of equipoise (genuine clinical uncertainty as to which intervention is the most beneficial), concerns about the logistics of device insertion and a perceived requirement for education and training. Conclusions This qualitative study raises awareness of key areas of concern to patients who need a CVAD for chemotherapy delivery. It was identified that there is a need for clearer patient information around CVADs. Additionally it allows investigators to identify barriers to recruitment in a timely manner in order to minimise the potential for conflict between the roles of carer and researcher and consequently, maximise recruitment to the RCT.
Collapse
|
42
|
Treweek S, Altman DG, Bower P, Campbell M, Chalmers I, Cotton S, Craig P, Crosby D, Davidson P, Devane D, Duley L, Dunn J, Elbourne D, Farrell B, Gamble C, Gillies K, Hood K, Lang T, Littleford R, Loudon K, McDonald A, McPherson G, Nelson A, Norrie J, Ramsay C, Sandercock P, Shanahan DR, Summerskill W, Sydes M, Williamson P, Clarke M. Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform. Trials 2015; 16:261. [PMID: 26044814 PMCID: PMC4475334 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0776-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2015] [Accepted: 05/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Randomised trials are at the heart of evidence-based healthcare, but the methods and infrastructure for conducting these sometimes complex studies are largely evidence free. Trial Forge ( www.trialforge.org ) is an initiative that aims to increase the evidence base for trial decision making and, in doing so, to improve trial efficiency.This paper summarises a one-day workshop held in Edinburgh on 10 July 2014 to discuss Trial Forge and how to advance this initiative. We first outline the problem of inefficiency in randomised trials and go on to describe Trial Forge. We present participants' views on the processes in the life of a randomised trial that should be covered by Trial Forge.General support existed at the workshop for the Trial Forge approach to increase the evidence base for making randomised trial decisions and for improving trial efficiency. Agreed upon key processes included choosing the right research question; logistical planning for delivery, training of staff, recruitment, and retention; data management and dissemination; and close down. The process of linking to existing initiatives where possible was considered crucial. Trial Forge will not be a guideline or a checklist but a 'go to' website for research on randomised trials methods, with a linked programme of applied methodology research, coupled to an effective evidence-dissemination process. Moreover, it will support an informal network of interested trialists who meet virtually (online) and occasionally in person to build capacity and knowledge in the design and conduct of efficient randomised trials.Some of the resources invested in randomised trials are wasted because of limited evidence upon which to base many aspects of design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials. Trial Forge will help to address this lack of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Doug G Altman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedics Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.
| | - Peter Bower
- Medical Research Council North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Marion Campbell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | | | - Seonaidh Cotton
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Peter Craig
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB, UK.
| | - David Crosby
- Medical Research Council, Methodology Research Programme (MRC MRP), London, UK.
| | - Peter Davidson
- Consultant in Public Health and Head of Health Technology Assessment, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials, and Studies Coordinating Centre, University of Southampton, Alpha House, Enterprise Road, Southampton, SO16 7NS, UK.
| | - Declan Devane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Lelia Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU), Nottingham Health Science Partners, C Floor, South Block, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Janet Dunn
- Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
| | - Diana Elbourne
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
| | - Barbara Farrell
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Carrol Gamble
- North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Liverpool, 1st floor Duncan Building, Daulby Street, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK.
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Kerry Hood
- South East Wales Trials Unit (SEWTU), School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
| | - Trudie Lang
- The Global Health Network, Oxford University Centre for Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | | - Kirsty Loudon
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Alison McDonald
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Gladys McPherson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Annmarie Nelson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4YS, UK.
| | - John Norrie
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Peter Sandercock
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| | | | | | - Matt Sydes
- Medical Research Council, Clinical Trials Unit (MRC CTU), London, UK.
| | - Paula Williamson
- North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research and Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, 1st floor Duncan Building Daulby Street, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK.
| | - Mike Clarke
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Block B, Queens University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Audit of transoral laser-assisted microsurgical resection of early laryngeal cancer. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2015; 129:372-6. [PMID: 25804366 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215115000626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to report our current practice of transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer against the standards outlined by the ENT UK Head and Neck Group and assess the oncological outcome. METHOD A retrospective review of case notes of patients diagnosed with early glottic cancer (tumour stages Tis, T1 and T2) who underwent transoral laser microsurgery as a primary curative treatment. The minimum follow-up period was two years. RESULTS Thirty-one patients had transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer during the study period. Eighty-four per cent of cases were discussed by a multidisciplinary team prior to transoral laser microsurgery. Complete circumferential excision was achieved in 77 per cent of cases. Sixty-five per cent of specimens were subjected to histological analysis; they complied with standard pathology reporting for margins. Within 12 months of transoral laser microsurgery, there were 10 residual cases and 2 recurrences. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis gave disease-free survival rates of 96.8 per cent at 18 months and 93.5 per cent at 24 months. The laryngectomy-free survival rate was 96.8 per cent at two years. CONCLUSION The findings of this audit are encouraging and have highlighted areas for further discussions, recommendations, training and education.
Collapse
|
44
|
Adams M, Caffrey L, McKevitt C. Barriers and opportunities for enhancing patient recruitment and retention in clinical research: findings from an interview study in an NHS academic health science centre. Health Res Policy Syst 2015; 13:8. [PMID: 25971302 PMCID: PMC4429658 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2014] [Accepted: 12/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, the recruitment of patients into clinical research is a national health research and development policy priority. There has been limited investigation of how national level factors operate as barriers or facilitators to recruitment work, particularly from the perspective of staff undertaking patient recruitment work. The aim of this study is to identify and examine staff views of the key organisational barriers and facilitators to patient recruitment work in one clinical research group located in an NHS Academic Health Science Centre. METHODS A qualitative study utilizing in-depth, one-to-one semi-structured interviews with 11 purposively selected staff with particular responsibilities to recruit and retain patients as clinical research subjects. Thematic analysis classified interview data by recurring themes, concepts, and emergent categories for the purposes of establishing explanatory accounts. RESULTS The findings highlight four key factors that staff perceived to be most significant for the successful recruitment and retention of patients in research and identify how staff located these factors within patients, studies, the research centre, the trust, and beyond the trust. Firstly, competition for research participants at an organisational and national level was perceived to undermine recruitment success. Secondly, the tension between clinical and clinical research workloads was seen to interrupt patient recruitment into studies, despite national funding arrangements to manage excess treatment costs. Thirdly, staff perceived an imbalance between personal patient burden and benefit. Ethical committee regulation, designed to protect patients, was perceived by some staff to detract from clarification and systematisation of incentivisation strategies. Finally, the structure and relationships within clinical research teams, in particular the low tacit status of recruitment skills, was seen as influential. CONCLUSIONS The results of this case-study, conducted in an exemplary NHS academic research centre, highlight current systematic challenges to patient recruitment and retention in clinical studies more generally as seen from the perspective of staff at the 'sharp end' of recruiting. Staff experience is that, beyond individual clinical research design and protocol factors, wider organisational and extra-organisational norms, structures, and processes operate as significant facilitators or hindrances in the recruitment of patients as research subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Adams
- King's College London, Division of Health and Social Care Research, and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London, SE1 3QD, UK.
| | - Louise Caffrey
- King's College London, Division of Health and Social Care Research, and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London, SE1 3QD, UK.
| | - Christopher McKevitt
- King's College London, Division of Health and Social Care Research, and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London, SE1 3QD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Paramasivan S, Strong S, Wilson C, Campbell B, Blazeby JM, Donovan JL. A simple technique to identify key recruitment issues in randomised controlled trials: Q-QAT - Quanti-Qualitative Appointment Timing. Trials 2015; 16:88. [PMID: 25873096 PMCID: PMC4359435 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0617-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recruitment to pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is acknowledged to be difficult, and few interventions have proved to be effective. Previous qualitative research has consistently revealed that recruiters provide imbalanced information about RCT treatments. However, qualitative research can be time-consuming to apply. Within a programme of research to optimise recruitment and informed consent in challenging RCTs, we developed a simple technique, Q-QAT (Quanti-Qualitative Appointment Timing), to systematically investigate and quantify the imbalance to help identify and address recruitment difficulties. Methods The Q-QAT technique comprised: 1) quantification of time spent discussing the RCT and its treatments using transcripts of audio-recorded recruitment appointments, 2) targeted qualitative research to understand the obstacles to recruitment and 3) feedback to recruiters on opportunities for improvement. This was applied to two RCTs with different clinical contexts and recruitment processes. Comparisons were made across clinical centres, recruiters and specialties. Results In both RCTs, the Q-QAT technique first identified considerable variations in the time spent by recruiters discussing the RCT and its treatments. The patterns emerging from this initial quantification of recruitment appointments then enabled targeted qualitative research to understand the issues and make suggestions to improve recruitment. In RCT1, presentation of the treatments was balanced, but little time was devoted to describing the RCT. Qualitative research revealed patients would have considered participation, but lacked awareness of the RCT. In RCT2, the balance of treatment presentation varied by specialists and centres. Qualitative research revealed difficulties with equipoise and confidence among recruiters presenting the RCT. The quantitative and qualitative findings were well-received by recruiters and opportunities to improve information provision were discussed. A blind coding exercise across three researchers led to the development of guidelines that can be used to apply the Q-QAT technique to other difficult RCTs. Conclusion The Q-QAT technique was easy to apply and rapidly identified obstacles to recruitment that could be understood through targeted qualitative research and addressed through feedback. The technique’s combination of quantitative and qualitative findings enabled the presentation of a holistic picture of recruitment challenges and added credibility to the feedback process. Note: both RCTs in this manuscript asked to be anonymised, so no trial registration details are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangeetha Paramasivan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Sean Strong
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Caroline Wilson
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Bruce Campbell
- Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital and University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK.
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Jenny L Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Quality of reporting on patient and public involvement within surgical research: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2015; 261:243-50. [PMID: 24950279 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment difficulties are a well-reported concern in surgical literature, which may be improved by patient and public involvement (PPI). PPI within research has been defined as being conducted "with" or "by" patients or members of the public rather than being "about" or "for" them. However, the extent to which PPI is used within surgical research is unknown. METHODS Surgical literature was systematically reviewed using EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed. Search terms related to (i) patients, (ii) involvement, (iii) perioperative care, and (iv) impact. Quality of PPI reporting was evaluated using the GRIPP (Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and Public checklist and the guidelines developed by Wright and Foster. A patient representative advised on the purpose and analysis of this systematic review. RESULTS Eight articles described PPI in surgical trials to improve the identification of research topics, study design, recruitment, retention, and data collection. Quality of PPI reporting was suboptimal, as none of the articles provided a clear account of how PPI was conceptualized. Training and support for patients, their involvement in dissemination, and a critique of the limitations of PPI were not reported. However, it was not clear whether this represents an underutilization of PPI or purely suboptimal reporting in surgery. CONCLUSIONS There is a paucity of surgical research reporting upon PPI, and the quality of reporting is low. Further research to define appropriate standards for reporting on PPI activities may facilitate broadening the utilization and impact of PPI in surgical research.
Collapse
|
47
|
Warner L, Chudasama J, Kelly CG, Loughran S, McKenzie K, Wight R, Dey P. Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD002027. [PMID: 25503538 PMCID: PMC6599864 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002027.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 2, 2002 and previously updated in 2004, 2007 and 2010.Radiotherapy, open surgery and endolaryngeal excision (with or without laser) are all accepted modalities of treatment for early-stage glottic cancer. Case series suggest that they confer a similar survival advantage, however radiotherapy and endolaryngeal surgery offer the advantage of voice preservation. There has been an observed trend away from open surgery in recent years, however equipoise remains between radiotherapy and endolaryngeal surgery as both treatment modalities offer laryngeal preservation with similar survival rates. Opinions on optimal therapy vary across disciplines and between countries. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of open surgery, endolaryngeal excision (with or without laser) and radiotherapy in the management of early glottic laryngeal cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2014, Issue 8); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the most recent search was 18 September 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing open surgery, endolaryngeal resection (with or without laser) and radiotherapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS We identified only one randomised controlled trial, which compared open surgery and radiotherapy in 234 patients with early glottic laryngeal cancer. The overall risk of bias in this study was high.For T1 tumours, the five-year survival was 91.7% following radiotherapy and 100% following surgery and for T2 tumours, 88.8% following radiotherapy and 97.4% following surgery. There were no significant differences in survival between the two groups.For T1 tumours, the five-year disease-free survival rate was 71.1% following radiotherapy and 100.0% following surgery, and for the T2 tumours, 60.1% following radiotherapy and 78.7% following surgery. Only the latter comparison was statistically significant (P value = 0.036), but statistical significance would not have been achieved with a two-sided test.Data were not available on side effects, quality of life, voice outcomes or cost.We identified no randomised controlled trials that included endolaryngeal surgery. A number of trials comparing endolaryngeal resection and radiotherapy have terminated early because of difficulty recruiting participants. One randomised controlled trial is still ongoing. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is only one randomised controlled trial comparing open surgery and radiotherapy but its interpretation is limited because of concerns about the adequacy of treatment regimens and deficiencies in the reporting of the study design and analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Warner
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery,North Manchester General Hospital, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Delaunays Road, Manchester, M8 5RB, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Current treatment of T1N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 272:1821-4. [PMID: 25381098 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3388-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
49
|
Donovan JL, de Salis I, Toerien M, Paramasivan S, Hamdy FC, Blazeby JM. The intellectual challenges and emotional consequences of equipoise contributed to the fragility of recruitment in six randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67:912-20. [PMID: 24811157 PMCID: PMC4067744 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2013] [Revised: 01/29/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Objective The aim of the study was to investigate how doctors considered and experienced the concept of equipoise while recruiting patients to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Study Design and Setting In-depth interviews with 32 doctors in six publicly funded pragmatic RCTs explored their perceptions of equipoise as they undertook RCT recruitment. The RCTs varied in size, duration, type of complex intervention, and clinical specialties. Interview data were analyzed using qualitative content and thematic analytical methods derived from grounded theory and synthesized across six RCTs. Results All six RCTs suffered from poor recruitment. Doctors wanted to gather robust evidence but experienced considerable discomfort and emotion in relation to their clinical instincts and concerns about patient eligibility and safety. Although they relied on a sense of community equipoise to justify participation, most acknowledged having “hunches” about particular treatments and patients, some of which undermined recruitment. Surgeons experienced these issues most intensely. Training and support promoted greater confidence in equipoise and improved engagement and recruitment. Conclusion Recruitment to RCTs is a fragile process and difficult for doctors intellectually and emotionally. Training and support can enable most doctors to become comfortable with key RCT concepts including equipoise, uncertainty, patient eligibility, and randomization, promoting a more resilient recruitment process in partnership with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny L Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Isabel de Salis
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Merran Toerien
- Department of Sociology, Wentworth College, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Sangeetha Paramasivan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Donovan JL, Paramasivan S, de Salis I, Toerien M. Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials. Trials 2014; 15:5. [PMID: 24393291 PMCID: PMC3892115 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2013] [Accepted: 12/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recruitment of sufficient participants in an efficient manner is still widely acknowledged to be a major challenge to the mounting and completion of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Few recruitment interventions have involved staff undertaking recruitment. This study aimed i) to understand the recruitment process from the perspective of recruiters actively recruiting RCT participants in six pragmatic RCTs, and ii) to identify opportunities for interventions to improve recruitment. Methods Interviews were undertaken with 72 individuals (32 doctors or RCT Chief investigators (CIs); 40 nurses/other health professionals) who were actively recruiting participants in six RCTs to explore their experiences of recruitment. The RCTs varied in scale, duration, and clinical contexts. Interviews were fully transcribed and analysed using qualitative content and thematic analytic methods derived from grounded theory. For this analysis, data were systematically extracted from each RCT and synthesised across all six RCTs to produce a detailed and nuanced understanding of the recruitment process from the perspectives of the recruiters. Results Recruiters readily identified organisational difficulties, fewer than expected eligible patients, and patients’ treatment preferences as the key barriers to recruitment. As they described their experiences of recruitment, several previously hidden issues related to their roles as researchers and clinicians emerged, imbued with discomfort and emotion. The synthesis across the RCTs showed that doctors were uncomfortable about aspects of patient eligibility and the effectiveness of interventions, whereas nurses were anxious about approaching potential RCT participants and conflicts between the research and their clinical responsibilities. Recruiters seemed unaware that their views contributed to recruitment difficulties. Their views were not known to RCT CIs. Training and support needs were identified for both groups of staff. Conclusions The synthesis showed that recruitment to these RCTs was a complex and fragile process. Clear obstacles were identified but hidden challenges related to recruiters’ roles undermined recruitment, unbeknown to RCT CIs. Qualitative research can elicit and identify the hidden challenges. Training and support are then needed for recruiters to become more comfortable with the design and principles of RCTs, so that they can engage more openly with potentially eligible participants and create a more resilient recruitment process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny L Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|