Cochlear obliteration after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery

Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation and Salvage Translabyrinthine Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma after Radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To report on the novel use of simultaneous cochlear implantation (CI) during salvage translabyrinthine resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS) after failed stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

PATIENT

A 52-year-old woman presented with a medium-sized right VS. She experienced continued tumor growth despite previous SRS, resulting in medial extension beyond the internal auditory canal into the cerebellopontine angle. Associated symptoms included asymmetrical right moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss, poor word recognition, tinnitus, and dizziness.

INTERVENTION

Simultaneous CI with translabyrinthine VS resection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

CI-aided pure-tone averages.

RESULTS

After 4 months of device use, CI-aided speech audiometry revealed hearing thresholds in the normal range, with a four-tone pure-tone, average of 16.3 dB. Speech perception with consonant-nucleus-consonant testing in the CI-only condition was 46%, representing a 12% improvement compared with preoperatively. Tinnitus and dizziness burden were subjectively reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite challenges inherent to second procedures after radiotherapy failure, successful CI outcomes can be achieved. The current study demonstrates the feasibility of simultaneous CI during salvage VS resection after SRS. A larger study should be undertaken to further substantiate these preliminary findings.

Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring in Cochlear Implantation after Vestibular Schwannoma Resection

BACKGROUND

The use of a cochlear implant (CI) for hearing rehabilitation after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection is widely spreading. The procedure is usually performed simultaneously to tumor resection with a translabyrinthine approach. To ensure the best device function, assessing the integrity of the cochlear nerve is of primary importance.

METHODS

A narrative review of the literature on the present topic was carried out up to June 2022. Finally, nine studies were considered.

RESULTS

Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (eABR) is the most widely used method of intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve (CN) during VS resection, although its limits are known. It can be assessed through the CI electrode array or through an intracochlear test electrode (ITE). Variations of the graph are evaluated during the surgical procedure, in particular the wave V amplitude and latency. As tumor dissection progresses, the parameters may change, informing of the CN status, and the surgical procedure may be modulated.

CONCLUSION

An eABR positive result seems to be reliably correlated with a good CI outcome in those cases in which a clear wave V is recorded before and after tumor removal. On the contrary, in those cases in which the eABR is lost or altered during the surgical procedure, the positioning of a CI is still debatable.

[Cochlear nerve continuity preservation during retrosigmoid ablative osteotomy of the internal auditory canal for advanced vestibular schwannomas]

The data of 86 patients with retrosigmoid microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma in tumor stage Koos II-IV were evaluated. In more than two thirds of the cases it was shown that the cochlear nerve followed the facial nerve, which is easily identified by electroneurography, in recurrent similar patterns in the region of the internal auditory canal. Starting from the fundus, this facilitated early identification and thus preservation of continuity of the cochlear nerve in the course of the internal auditory canal. This was of particular importance when safe functional preservation could not be guaranteed due to tumor size or formation despite intraoperative derivation of somatosenoric potentials, but when the possibility of subsequent hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant should be granted. Preoperative MRI sequences gave an indication of the possible nerve courses in some cases, but intraoperative imaging in the internal auditory canal was superior to MRI.

Challenges of Cochlear Implantation in Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma Patients: Surgical Procedures and Auditory Outcome

Intralabyrinthine schwannoma (ILS) is a rare benign tumor of the inner ear potentially causing unilateral sensorineural hearing loss and vertigo. This study evaluated the outcome of one surgical session comprising microsurgical ILS resection and cochlear implantation in terms of surgical feasibility, complications, and auditory outcome. Ten clinically and histologically confirmed ILS patients included in this study (three women and seven men; mean age 56.4 ± 8.6) underwent surgery between July 2015 and February 2020. Eight patients had intracochlear tumor location; the remaining two had vestibulocochlear and intravestibular ILS. One of the three following methods was used for tumor removal: an extended cochleostomy, subtotal cochleoectomy, or a translabyrinthine approach. Although negligible improvement was observed in two of the patients, two patients were lost to follow-up, and one opted out from using CI, the speech perception of the five remaining ILS patients improved as per the Freiburg Monosyllable Test (FMT) from 0% before surgery to 45– 50% after the implantation. Our study supports the presented surgical approach’s feasibility and safety, enabling tumor removal and hearing restoration shortly after surgery.

Neuromonitoring of the cochlear nerve during vestibular schwannoma resection and simultaneous cochlear implantation

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors that originate from the nerve sheath of one of the two vestibular nerves. VS can have a severe impact on everyday life of the patient and may lead to symptoms such as vertigo, hearing loss (e.g., as sudden deafness), deafness, and tinnitus. Treatment concepts include observational waiting with regular imaging control ("wait and scan"), radiotherapy, or surgical resection. Depending on the size of the tumor and status of functional hearing, the surgical approach may be retrosigmoidal, transtemporal, retrolabyrinthine, or translabyrinthine. The translabyrinthine approach always results in complete deafness due to opening of the bony labyrinth. If the nerve structure of the cochlear nerve is preserved, hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant (CI) may be successful. In this article the surgical technique for microsurgical resection of VS using a translabyrinthine approach with simultaneous cochlear implantation under intraoperative monitoring of the cochlear nerve by electrical stimulation is presented.

Cochlear Implantation in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma and Other Retrocochlear Pathology: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

To describe outcomes with cochlear implantation (CI) for rehabilitation of hearing loss in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) and other retrocochlear pathologies.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary-care center.

PATIENTS

Twenty three cases in 19 patients (53% men, mean age 55.8 yr) with non-neurofibromatosis type 2 related retrocochlear pathology.

INTERVENTIONS

Unilateral or bilateral CI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Word recognition score, device usage.

RESULTS

Etiology of deafness included sporadic VS (n = 9, 39%), radiation after head and neck or central nervous system (CNS) malignancy (n = 8, 35%), superficial siderosis (n = 3, 13%), neurosarcoidosis (n = 2, 9%), and pontine stroke (n = 1, 4%). Mean follow-up duration was 2.3 years (standard deviation [SD] 3.0; range, 0.2-9.4). Auditory perception was achieved in 20 out of 22 patients (91%) who have been activated. Mean WRS in patients with sporadic VS was 18% (SD 20; range, 0-44). Mean WRS in patients with non-VS retrocochlear pathology was 55% (SD 30; range, 0-94). Data logs showed 7.0 h/d of average use (SD 4.3; range, 0-13).

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriately selected patients with retrocochlear pathology may benefit from CI so long as the patient has a cochlear fluid signal and an intact cochlear nerve. Patients with sporadic VS patients and normal contralateral hearing exhibited guarded outcomes with CI, whereas most patients with non-VS retrocochlear pathologies demonstrated open-set speech understanding scores comparable to or slightly worse than conventional CI candidates. Since variable performance benefit is observed with CI in patients with retrocochlear pathology, counseling is imperative to align patient expectations with realistic outcomes.

[Neuromonitoring of the cochlear nerve during vestibular schwannoma resection and simultaneous cochlear implantation. German version]

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors that originate from the nerve sheath of one of the two vestibular nerves. VS can have a severe impact on everyday life of the patient and may lead to symptoms such as vertigo, hearing loss (e.g., as sudden deafness), deafness, and tinnitus. Treatment concepts include observational waiting with regular imaging control ("wait and scan"), radiotherapy, or surgical resection. Depending on the size of the tumor and status of functional hearing, the surgical approach may be retrosigmoidal, transtemporal, retrolabyrinthine, or translabyrinthine. The translabyrinthine approach always results in complete deafness due to opening of the bony labyrinth. If the nerve structure of the cochlear nerve is preserved, hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant (CI) may be successful. In this article the surgical technique for microsurgical resection of VS using a translabyrinthine approach with simultaneous cochlear implantation under intraoperative monitoring of the cochlear nerve by electrical stimulation is presented.

Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Single-sided Deafness After the Translabyrinthine Resection of the Vestibular Schwannoma-Presented at the Annual Meeting of ADANO 2016 in Berlin

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effectiveness of the cochlear implant (CI) to facilitate single-sided deafness (SSD) rehabilitation following translabyrinthine resection of the vestibular schwannoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective patient review.

SETTING

Single center, University hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with SSD who underwent translabyrinthine resection of a vestibular schwannoma with anatomical preservation of the cochlear nerve and subsequent CI on the same ear.

INTERVENTIONS

CI at post-translabyrinthine resection of the acoustic neuroma to treat SSD, and evaluation by retrospective individual case review in a period from 2009 to 2016.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Individual patients' clinical outcome and speech understanding.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were provided CI. In all cases, complete removal of the tumor was achieved and the cochlear nerve was preserved; in one case, the CI was implanted simultaneously. In most cases, the follow-up interval was 2 years. In 9 of 13 cases, the implanted ear achieved capability to understand and discriminate monosyllabic words at 65 dB. Level of speech understanding of over 50% at 65 dB was possible in 7 patients at 12 months after the first fitting of CI.

CONCLUSIONS

Under certain conditions, CI was an effective solution to restore hearing in patients with SSD following translabyrinthine access to the skull base. Study with prospective design is required to provide more significant results.

Cochlear Patency after Translabyrinthine and Retrosigmoid Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence and onset of cochlear obliteration after translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid vestibular schwannoma surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified a consecutive series of eighty ears in eighty vestibular schwannoma patients who were treated via a translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approach by a single neuro-otological surgical team in a tertiary referral center from May 2011 to January 2018. Postoperative, high- resolution T2-weighted turbo spin echo three-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) images of the posterior fossa were evaluated at the level of the membranous labyrinth and internal auditory canal. Perilymphatic patency of the vestibule, basal, and apical cochlear turns were scored and classified as patent, hypointense, partially obliterated, or completely obliterated.

RESULTS

Twenty-five vestibular schwannomas were treated with surgery via a translabyrinthine approach, and fifty-five were treated using a retrosigmoid approach; of these, 8% and 65%, respectively, showed no signs of perilymphatic alterations in the basal or apical turns, while 84% and 20%, respectively, showed partial or complete obliteration in the basal or apical turns with a mean postoperative interval of 127 and 140 days, respectively. All the patients who underwent multiple MR scans and had a completely patent perilymphatic system on the first postoperative scan remained patent during subsequent scans; 16% of the patients showed worsened perilymphatic appearance. The onset of cochlear obliteration occurred within 2-7 months in most translabyrinthine patients.

CONCLUSION

These findings may support the need for simultaneous cochlear electrode or dummy implantation in translabyrinthine surgery. Second-stage implantation could be feasible in cases where a retrosigmoid approach is used; however, the implantation should be considered within the initial months to avoid cochlear obliteration. Findings on the first postoperative MR could indicate the need for intensified MR follow-up and may even predict the occurrence of cochlear obliteration.

Cochlear patency following translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma resection: implications for hearing rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

To examine when cochlear fibrosis occurs following a translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma resection, and to determine the safest time window for potential cochlear implantation in cases with a preserved cochlear nerve.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed the post-operative magnetic resonance imaging scans of patients undergoing a translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma resection, assessing the fluid signal within the cochlea. Cochleae were graded based on the Isaacson et al. system (from grade 0 - no obstruction, to grade 4 - complete obliteration).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The cochleae showed no evidence of obliteration in: 75 per cent of patients at six months, 38.5 per cent at one year and 27 per cent beyond one year. Most changes happened between 6 and 12 months after vestibular schwannoma resection, with cases of an unobstructed cochlear decreasing dramatically, from 75 per cent to 38.5 per cent, within this time.

CONCLUSION

The progress of cochlear obliteration that occurred between 6 and 12 months following vestibular schwannoma resection indicates that the first 6 months provides a safer time window for cochlear patency.

[Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants. German version]

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and the cochlea is of central importance in neurotology. The artefacts and visibility of the different types of active auditory implants in MRI vary, due to their specific ferromagnetic components. Knowledge of the size of MRI artefacts and the options for handling these is important for the auditory rehabilitation of specific diseases (e. g., vestibular schwannoma).

METHODS

The current paper is a literature review RESULTS: MRI assessment of the IAC and cochlea after surgical placement of an active auditory implant is feasible only with a percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, Ponto). When specific factors (implant position and MRI sequence) are taken into consideration, these structures can be visualized even after cochlear implantation. Complications such as magnet dislocation and pain may occur.

CONCLUSION

The possibility of assessing the IAC and cochlea by MRI is an important aspect that needs to be taken into consideration when planning the auditory rehabilitation of patients after acoustic neuroma surgery.

Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour

Disregarding the widely used division of skull base into anterior and lateral, since the skull base should be conceived as a single anatomic structure, it was to our convenience to group all those approaches that run from the antero-lateral, pure lateral and postero-lateral side of the skull base as “Surgery of the lateral skull base”. “50 years of endeavour” points to the great effort which has been made over the last decades, when more and more difficult surgeries were performed by reducing morbidity. The principle of lateral skull base surgery, “remove skull base bone to approach the base itself and the adjacent sites of the endo-esocranium”, was then combined with function preservation and with tailoring surgery to the pathology. The concept that histology dictates the extent of resection, balancing the intrinsic morbidity of each approach was the object of the first section of the present report. The main surgical approaches were described in the second section and were conceived not as a step-by-step description of technique, but as the highlighthening of the surgical principles. The third section was centered on open issues related to the tumor and its treatment. The topic of vestibular schwannoma was investigated with the current debate on observation, hearing preservation surgery, hearing rehabilitation, radiotherapy and the recent efforts to detect biological markers able to predict tumor growth. Jugular foramen paragangliomas were treated in the frame of radical or partial surgery, radiotherapy, partial “tailored” surgery and observation. Surgery on meningioma was debated from the point of view of the neurosurgeon and of the otologist. Endolymphatic sac tumors and malignant tumors of the external auditory canal were also treated, as well as chordomas, chondrosarcomas and petrous bone cholesteatomas. Finally, the fourth section focused on free-choice topics which were assigned to aknowledged experts. The aim of this work was attempting to report the state of the art of the lateral skull base surgery after 50 years of hard work and, above all, to raise questions on those issues which still need an answer, as to allow progress in knowledge through sharing of various experiences. At the end of the reading, if more doubts remain rather than certainties, the aim of this work will probably be achieved.

Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and cochlea is of central importance in neurotology. The artefacts and visibility of active auditory implants on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vary because of their specific magnetic components. Knowledge of the size of MRI artefacts and the options for handling them is important for the auditory rehabilitation of specific diseases (e. g., vestibular schwannoma).

METHODS

The current article is a literature review.

RESULTS

MRI assessment of the IAC and cochlea after surgical placement of an active auditory implant is feasible only with a percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, Ponto). When specific factors (implant position and MRI sequence) are taken into consideration, these structures can be visualized even after cochlear implantation. Complications such as magnet dislocation and pain may occur.

CONCLUSION

The possibility of assessing the IAC and cochlea by MRI is an important aspect that needs to be taken into consideration when planning the auditory rehabilitation of patients after acoustic neuroma surgery.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 1.5 T In Vivo

Objective

Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging with the magnet of the cochlear implant receiver/stimulator in place causes artifacts and hinders evaluation of intracerebral structures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal auditory canal and the labyrinth in a 1.5T MRI with the magnet in place.

Study Design

Observational study.

Setting

Tertiary referral center.

Subjects and Methods

The receiver/stimulator unit was placed and fixed onto the head of three volunteers at three different angles to the nasion-outer ear canal (90°-160°) and at three different distances from the outer ear canal (5-9 cm). T1 and T2 weighted sequences were conducted for each position.

Results

Excellent visibility of the internal auditory canal and the labyrinth was seen in the T2 weighted sequences with 9 cm between the magnet and the outer ear canal at every nasion-outer ear canal angle. T1 sequences showed poorer visibility of the internal auditory canal and the labyrinth.

Conclusion

Aftercare and visibility of intracerebral structures after cochlear implantation is becoming more important as cochlear implant indications are widened worldwide. With a distance of at least 9 cm from the outer ear canal the artifact induced by the magnet allows evaluation of the labyrinth and the internal auditory canal.

Postoperative Cochlear Obliteration after Retrosigmoid Approach in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma

Objective  Vestibular schwannomas (VSNs) account for the vast majority of lesions located in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). The goals of VSN surgery are possible total tumor removal, intact facial nerve function, and preservation of cochlear nerve function. In cases of pre- or postoperative deafness, restoration of hearing with auditory brainstem implant (ABI) or cochlear implant (CI) is a promising treatment option with normally better results in CI than in ABI. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate cochlear ossification or obliteration secondary to a retrosigmoid approach, which is important for later CI, especially in single-sided deafness. Materials and Methods  We retrospectively reviewed data from our suboccipital retrosigmoid operation database for the period from January 2008 to February 2015. A total of 65 patients with VSN could be analyzed retrospectively. The patient's data (age, gender, side of operation, tumor entities, and the duration of follow-up) were evaluated. The most recent T2-weigted MRI exams were taken into account for the evaluation of cochlea. To compare left and right sides, the coronal reformatted images were reconstructed in a symmetrical way. Results  Twenty-two out of 65 (33%) patients had cochlear obliteration in our survey. The cochlear obliteration was more common in females (44 vs. 20% in males). The median follow-up was 28 months. The size and the intrameatal extension of tumors could not be considered as factors influencing the cochlear obliteration rate. According to our survey, 33% of suboccipital approaches manifested cochlear obliteration to some extent. It was more common in females. The intrameatal extension of tumors played statistically no role in the occurrence of postoperative cochlear obliteration. Whether the prohibition of cochlear ossification can be best achieved by retrosigmoid approaches, compared to other approaches to the CPA, or not could be a subject of future studies.

Cochlear Patency After Translabyrinthine Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine the temporal occurrence of fluid signal changes on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T2MRI) that occur in the cochlear lumen after translabyrinthine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case control study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral neurotology center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients were identified who underwent translabyrinthine removal of a vestibular schwannoma between 2010 and 2014; of these 49 were included as they had postoperative T2 MRI at 6, 18, and 48 months available postsurgery. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were scored base on fluid signal changes within the cochlea.

RESULTS

In total, 147 magnetic resonance imaging scans were reviewed on 49 patients. In the cohort analysis 86% of patients showed evidence of fluid signal changes 48 months postoperatively. Ninety-five percent of patients who went on to demonstrate loss of fluid signal at 48 months had already shown changes at 6 months postsurgery. The majority of cochlea signal changes identified at 6 months were minor (72% Grade 1) while at 48 months this had progressed to severe (71% Grade 2 or 3). Of the patients with a normal cochlea at 6 months 78% maintained a normal cochlea to the 48-month scan.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear signal changes suggestive of fibrosis occurred in most patients following translabyrinthine removal of vestibular schwannoma. Given the early onset of cochlear fluid signal changes on T2MRI, and the progression of these changes on subsequence imaging, cochlear implantation would ideally need to be performed either simultaneous to translabyrinthine surgery or as an early second-stage procedure to maximize the chance of a successful electrode insertion, or one can consider a placeholder as well.

Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Receiver Position and Its Temporal Changes

HYPOTHESIS

It was the aim of this study to establish normative data regarding intended changes in cochlear implants (CI) receiver positioning by one surgeon over time.

BACKGROUND

With the increasing number of CI patients, the probability of needing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases. The accessibility of cerebral structures is limited by MRI artifacts caused by CI. New studies show a dependence of the visibility of intracranial structures by the MRI sequences and the position of the CI receiver itself.

METHODS

Retrospective and interindividual investigation of topograms with regard to the nasion-external auditory canal-internal magnet angle and the distance between the internal magnet and the external auditory canal. We evaluated scans of 150 CI recipients implanted from 2008 until 2015.

RESULTS

The most common implant position in the years 2008 to 2015 was a nasion-external auditory canal-internal magnet angle between 121 and 140 degrees (mean, 127 degrees) and an internal magnet-external auditory canal distance between 61 and 80 mm (mean, 70 mm). Over time the nasion-external auditory canal-internal magnet angle increased and the internal magnet-external auditory canal distance decreased, both to a statistically significant degree. A difference between the manufacturers was not observed.

CONCLUSION

The CI receiver position is important for an artifact-free examination of the internal auditory canal and the cochlea. The realization of the position over a time course supports awareness of artifact-related visibility limitations.

Cochlear obliteration following a translabyrinthine approach and its implications in cochlear implantation

The most frequent sequelae following a translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma resection is complete hearing loss on the affected side. Such patients could benefit from a cochlear implant, provided that two essential requisites are met before surgery: a preserved cochlear nerve and a patent cochlea to accommodate the electrode array. The goal of our study is to determine the prevalence and extent of cochlear ossification following a translabyrinthine approach. Postoperative MRI of 41 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified according to the degree of cochlear obliteration into three groups (patent cochlea, partially obliterated cochlea and totally obliterated cochlea). The interval between surgery and the first MRI was studied as well as its relationship with the rate of cochlear ossification. At first postoperative MRI (mean interval of 20 months), 78% of patients showed some degree of cochlear ossification. Differences were found in the time interval between surgery and first MRI for each group, showing a smaller interval of time the patent cochlea group (p > 0.05). When MRI was performed before the first year after surgery, a larger rate of patent cochlea was found (p > 0.05). The present study suggests that cochlear ossification is a time-depending process, whose grounds are still to be defined.

[Treatment and auditory rehabilitation of intralabyrinthine schwannoma by means of cochlear implants - German Version]

BACKGROUND

To date, the therapy of intralabyrinthine schwannoma consists mainly of a wait-and-see approach, completely ignoring auditory rehabilitation. Only a few single-case reports are as yet available on treatment with cochlear implants (CI).

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study aimed to assess the results of auditory rehabilitation after treatment with CI in a series of cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The demographic findings, symptoms, and results of surgical therapy in 8 patients were evaluated in a retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Prior to surgery, all patients presented with profound hearing loss and tinnitus. Episodic dizziness was reported by 3 patients. Among the patients, 4 had an intracochlear and 3 an intravestibular schwannoma, and a transmodiolar schwannoma was found in 1 patient. A total of 6 patients underwent treatment with CI. The results of auditory rehabilitation are favorable with open-set speech comprehension.

DISCUSSION

CI treatment following resection of an intralabyrinthine schwannoma is a promising option for auditory rehabilitation, even in single-sided deafness. This is a new treatment concept in contrast to the wait-and-scan policy. Expectant management appears justified only if the patient still has usable hearing.

Cochlear Patency After Transmastoid Labyrinthectomy for Ménière's Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Labyrinthectomy is considered the "gold standard" in the treatment of intractable vertigo attacks because of Ménière's Disease (MD) but sacrifices all residual hearing. Interest in auditory rehabilitation has lead to cochlear implantation in some patients. Concern remains that the cochlear lumen may fill with tissue or bone after surgery. This study sought to determine the incidence of obliteration of the cochlea after transmastoid labyrinthectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Eighteen patients with intractable vertigo from MD who underwent surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Transmastoid labyrinthectomy between 2008 and 2013. Cochleas were imaged with unenhanced, heavily T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Presence of symmetrical cochlear fluid signals on MRI.

RESULTS

There was no loss of fluid signal in the cochleas of operated ear compared with the contralateral, unoperated ear in any subject an average of 3 years (standard deviation [SD]: 1.2) after surgery. Five of 18 patients had the vestibule blocked with bone wax at the time of surgery. Blocking the vestibule with bone wax did not change the cochlear fluid signal.

CONCLUSION

The risk of cochlear obstruction after labyrinthectomy for MD is very low. The significance of this finding is that patients with MD who undergo labyrinthectomy will likely remain candidates for cochlear implantation in the labyrinthectomized ear long after surgery if this becomes needed. Immediate cochlear implantation or placement of a cochlear lumen keeper during labyrinthectomy for MD is probably not necessary.

Intralabyrinthine schwannomas : Surgical management and hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants

Intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILS) are a rare differential diagnosis of sudden hearing loss and vertigo. In an own case series of 12 patients, 6 tumors showed an intracochlear, 3 an intravestibular, 1 a transmodiolar including the cerebellopontine angle (CPA), 1a transotic including the CPA, and 1 a multilocular location. The tumors were removed surgically in 9 patients, whereas 3 patients decided for a "wait-and-test-and-scan" strategy. Of the surgical patients, 3 underwent labyrinthectomy and cochlear implant (CI) surgery in a single-stage procedure; 1 patient had extended cochleostomy with CI surgery; 3 underwent partial or subtotal cochleoectomy, with partial cochlear reconstruction and CI surgery (n = 1) or implantation of electrode dummies for possible later CI after repeated MRI follow-up (n = 2); and in 2 patients, the tumors of the internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle exhibiting transmodiolar or transmacular growth were removed by combined translabyrinthine-transotic resection. For the intracochlear tumors, vestibular function could mostly be preserved after surgery. In all cases with CI surgery, hearing rehabilitation was successful, although speech discrimination was limited for the case with subtotal cochleoectomy. Surgical removal of intracochlear schwannomas via partial or subtotal cochleoectomy is, in principle, possible with preservation of vestibular function. In the authors' opinion, radiotherapy of ILS is only indicated in isolated cases. Cochlear implantation during or after tumor resection (i. e., as synchronous or staged surgeries) is an option for hearing rehabilitation in cartain cases and represents a therapeutic approach in contrast to a "wait-and-test-and-scan" strategy.

Factors Influencing Cochlear Patency after Translabyrinthine Surgery

Objective

To determine predictive factors for cochlear obliteration after translabyrinthine surgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Neurotology referral center.

Subjects and Methods

In total, 345 charts were reviewed, resulting in 103 patients who underwent translabyrinthine surgery between January 2010 and July 2015 and had postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for review. Surveillance MRI performed after translabyrinthine resection of vestibular schwannomas was reviewed. Heavily T2-weighted MRI obtained an average of 21.8 months after surgery was reviewed to assess cochlear patency. Tumor size, preoperative audiograms, and MRI cochlear fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) intensity were compared between patients with retained cochlear patency and those without.

Results

Fifty-four percent of patients retained cochlear patency after translabyrinthine surgery. Tumor size did not differ statistically between the 2 groups. There was no statistically significant difference in speech reception thresholds, pure-tone average, or word recognition scores between patent and nonpatent groups. Preoperative MRI FLAIR intensity did not differ between groups.

Conclusions

More than half of patients retain cochlear patency after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery. Cochlear patency is required for cochlear implant in patients with unilateral deafness. Preoperative tumor size, hearing performance, and intensity on MRI FLAIR do not predict cochlear patency. To prevent loss of opportunity for cochlear implantation, simultaneous implantation and cochlear lumen keeper placement are options.

MRI Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 3 T In Vivo

HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the assessment of the internal auditory canal and the labyrinth in relation to different CI magnet positions and MRI sequences at 3 T.

BACKGROUND

The indication criteria for cochlear implantation have been changed over the years and the growing number of implantations in patients after acoustic neuroma resections underline the importance of a postoperative MR imaging to assess the internal auditory canal (IAC) and the labyrinth. The MRI artifact induced by the cochlear implant magnet is a known problem that should be further observed by this investigation.

METHODS

We compared the artifacts of Cochlear 512 magnets at different head positions in vivo at 3 T. The observed positions varied with a nasion-external ear canal angle of 90, 120, and 160 degrees and a variable distance of 5, 7, and 9 cm in relation to the external ear canal and different MRI sequences.

RESULTS

The complete assessment of the internal auditory canal and labyrinth was possible with a magnet positioned at 90 degrees and 9 cm and 160 degrees and 9 cm. Evaluation of the IAC alone was possible with magnet positions at 90 degrees and 7 cm and 9 cm, 120 degrees and 9 cm, and 160 degrees and 7 cm and 9 cm. A high-resolution 3D T2w Drive sequence decreased the visibility of the structures significantly. A high-resolution TSE 2D T2w sequence together with one of the above-described positions allowed sufficient visualization of the structures.

CONCLUSION

The position of the implant and the MRI sequence used determine the assessment of the IAC and the labyrinth at 3 T MRI. A position of the implant magnet at a nasion-external auditory canal angle which is more horizontal and posterior than so far commonly used allows a better visualization of the IAC and the labyrinth at 3 T.